Search

Background Flow-diverting devices (FDDs), such as the Pipeline Embolization Device, have been gaining traction for treating challenging posterior circulation aneurysms. Few previous studies have focused on using FDDs to treat aneurysms of the basilar quadrifurcation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the use of FDDs to treat patients with basilar quadrifurcation aneurysms. Patients were assessed for aneurysm type, previous aneurysm treatment, technical success, periprocedural complications, and long-term aneurysm occlusion. Results 34 patients were assessed; aneurysms of the basilar apex (n=23) or superior cerebellar artery (SCA) (n=7), or both (n=1), and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) (n=3). The mean (SD) largest aneurysm dimension was 8.7 (6.1) mm (range 1.9-30.8 mm). 14 aneurysms were previously surgically clipped or endovascularly coiled. All aneurysms had a saccular morphology. Complete or near-complete occlusion was achieved in 30 of 34 patients (88%) at final angiographic follow-up, a mean (SD) of 6.6 (5.4) months (range 0-19 months) postoperatively. No patient experienced postoperative symptomatic occlusions of the SCA or PCA; 4 patients developed asymptomatic posterior communicating artery occlusions; 28 patients (82%) experienced no complications; whereas 3 (9%) experienced major complications and 3 (9%) experienced minor complications; and 1 patient died as a result of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Conclusion Flow diversion may be a safe and effective option to treat basilar quadrifurcation aneurysms. Previously treated basilar quadrifurcation aneurysms with recurrence or residual lesion may benefit from additional treatment with an FDD. Further prospective studies should be directed toward validating these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the treatment options for blood blister-like aneurysms (BAs) of the internal carotid artery (ICA). The authors conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing bypass versus non-bypass open microsurgical techniques and endovascular therapy for the treatment of ICA BAs. The results showed that bypass and non-bypass techniques had similar rates of complications and outcomes. However, when comparing microsurgical techniques to endovascular therapy, the latter had a higher rate of favorable functional outcomes. The authors note that more research is needed to compare specific variations in microsurgical techniques and to better understand how factors like aneurysmal angioarchitecture and patient comorbidities can guide treatment selection. [Extracted from the article]

Background Basilar artery (BA) fenestration aneurysm (BAFA) is a rare phenomenon commonly accompanying other aneurysms. Treatment is challenging, and few cases have been reported. This review investigated the management outcomes of BAFAs. Methods Publication databases were searched to identify studies evaluating outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) and microsurgical treatment of BAFAs from inception through 2021. Outcomes (clinical, angiographic, postoperative complications, and retreatment rates) were collected and analyzed. The authors present their case of a patient treated for a BAFA. Results Including the authors' case, 184 patients with 209 BAFAs were reported in 68 studies. Most patients (130/175; 74.3%) presented with ruptured aneurysms, most commonly involving the proximal segment of the BA. Most BAFAs were small (52/103, 50.5%) and saccular (119/143, 83.2%). Most patients underwent EVT (143/184, 77.7%); the rest underwent microsurgery. Postoperative complications after EVT occurred in 10 (8.3%) of 120 patients, with 4 of the 10 experiencing strokes. At clinical followup, most EVT patients (74/86, 86.0%) showed good outcomes; 3.9% (2/51) had died. Most aneurysms managed with EVT (56/73, 76.7%) showed complete occlusion at follow-up; 7.3% (8/109) were retreated. Postoperative complications occurred in 62.2% (23/37) of microsurgical patients; 5 (21.7%) of the 23 experienced strokes. All patients showed good clinical outcomes at follow-up. Most aneurysms (22/28, 78.6%) treated microsurgically showed complete occlusion at angiographic follow- up, with no retreatment required. Conclusion BAFAs are often symptomatic; thus, treatment is challenging. By the 2000s, treatment had moved from microsurgical to endovascular modalities, with good clinical and angiographic outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

background This study aims to define the proportion of Medicare neuroendovascular procedures performed by different specialists from 2013 to 2019, map the geographic distribution of these specialists, and trend reimbursement for these procedures. Methods The Medicare Provider Utilization Database was queried for recognized neuroendovascular procedures. Data on specialists and their geographic distribution were tabulated. Reimbursement data were gathered using the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool and adjusted for inflation using the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index Inflation calculator. results The neuroendovascular workforce in 2013 and 2019, respectively, was as follows: radiologists (46% vs 44%), neurosurgeons (45% vs 35%), and neurologists (9% vs 21%). Neurologists increased proportionally (p=0.03). Overall procedure numbers increased across each specialty: radiology (360%; p=0.02), neurosurgery (270%; p<0.01), and neurology (1070%; p=0.03). Neuroendovascular revascularization (CPT 61645) increased in all fields: radiology (170%; p<0.01), neurosurgery (280%; p<0.01), neurology (240%; p<0.01); central nervous system (CNS) permanent occlusion/embolization (CPT61624) in neurosurgery (67%; p=0.03); endovascular temporary balloon artery occlusion (CPT61623) in neurology (29%; p=0.04). In 2019, radiologists were the most common neuroendovascular specialists everywhere except in the Northeast where neurosurgeons predominated. Inflation adjusted reimbursement decreased for endovascular temporary balloon occlusion (CPT61623, -13%; p=0.01), CNS transcatheter permanent occlusion or embolization (CPT61624, -13%; p=0.02), non-CNS transcatheter permanent occlusion or embolization (CPT61626, -12%; p<0.01), and intracranial stent placement (CPT61635, -12%; p=0.05). Conclusions The number of neuroendovascular procedures and specialists increased, with neurologists becoming more predominant. Reimbursement decreased. Coordination among neuroendovascular specialists in terms of training and practice location may maximize access to acute care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Optimal definitive treatment timing for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains controversial. We compared outcomes for aSAH patients with ultra-early treatment versus later treatment at a single large center. Method: Patients who received definitive open surgical or endovascular treatment for aSAH between January 1, 2014, and July 31, 2019, were included. Ultra-early treatment was defined as occurring within 24 h from aneurysm rupture. The primary outcome was poor neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Scale score > 2). Propensity adjustment was performed for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, aneurysm treatment type, aneurysm type, size, and anterior location. Results: Of the 1013 patients (mean [SD] age, 56 [14] years; 702 [69%] women, 311 [31%] men) included, 94 (9%) had ultra-early treatment. Compared with the non-ultra-early cohort, the ultra-early treatment cohort had a significantly lower percentage of saccular aneurysms (53 of 94 [56%] vs 746 of 919 [81%], P <0.001), greater frequency of open surgical treatment (72 of 94 [77%] vs 523 of 919 [57%], P <0.001), and greater percentage of men (38 of 94 [40%] vs 273 of 919 [30%], P =.04). After adjustment, ultra-early treatment was not associated with neurologic outcome in those with at least 180-day follow-up (OR = 0.86), the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia (OR = 0.87), or length of stay (exp(β), 0.13) (P ≥ 0.60). Conclusions: In a large, single-center cohort of aSAH patients, ultra-early treatment was not associated with better neurologic outcome, fewer cases of delayed cerebral ischemia, or shorter length of stay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Liver cirrhosis is associated with an increased risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, large studies analyzing the prognosis of cirrhotic patients after aSAH treatment are lacking. This study explores factors associated with inpatient mortality among aSAH patients with cirrhosis. All patients who underwent open or endovascular treatment for an aSAH at a large quaternary center between January 1, 2003, and July 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into cirrhosis versus noncirrhosis groups. Univariate analysis determined variables associated with inpatient mortality. Variables with P < 0.20 were included in a propensity-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis to predict inpatient mortality. A total of 1419 patients were treated for aSAH; 17 (1.2%) had confirmed cirrhosis. Inpatient mortality was significantly higher among cirrhotic patients than noncirrhotic patients (35.3% vs. 6.8%; P < 0.001). In the univariate analysis for inpatient mortality, the variables cirrhosis, age >65 years, Charlson Comorbidity Index >4, aneurysm size ≥10 mm, Hunt and Hess grade >3, Fisher grade 4, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), and posterior circulation aneurysm had P < 0.20 and were included in the multivariable analysis. The propensity-adjusted stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that cirrhosis (odds ratio [OR]: 12.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3–48.7), Hunt and Hess grade >3 (OR: 3.9, 95% CI: 2.3–6.4), Fisher grade 4 (OR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.3–10.7), and DCI (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.5–3.9) were associated with inpatient mortality (P ≤ 0.01). Cirrhosis was a predictor of inpatient mortality among aSAH patients and was a stronger predictor than DCI or a poor Hunt and Hess grade among patients in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Ruptured anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms can be challenging to treat via an endovascular procedure. This study analyzed retreatment rates and neurological outcomes associated with ruptured ACoA aneurysms treated via endovascular coiling. Methods All patients with a ruptured ACoA aneurysm treated with endovascular coiling from 2003 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed at a single center. Two comparisons were performed: no retreatment versus retreatment and coil embolization versus balloon-assisted coil embolization. Outcomes included retreatment and neurological outcome assessed via modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results During the study period, 186 patients with ruptured ACoA aneurysms underwent coil embolization. Treatment included standard coil embolization (68.3%, n=127), balloon-assisted coiling (28.5%, n=53), and stent-assisted embolization (2.7%, n=5). Angiographic outcomes were as follows: class I, 65.1% (n=121); class II, 28.5% (n=53); and class III, 6.5% (n=12). There were no aneurysm reruptures after the index procedure. The mean (SD) mRS score was 2.7 (2.0) at last follow-up (mortality, 19 (10%)). Retreatment occurred in 9.7% (n=18). Patients with retreatment were younger with lower-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage and more favorable functional status at discharge. Patients with aneurysms >7 mm (n=36) were significantly more likely to have recurrence (22.2% vs 6.7%, P=0.005). Conclusions Endovascular treatment of ruptured ACoA aneurysms is safe and is associated with low mortality and retreatment rates. Younger patients with favorable functional status and larger aneurysm size are more likely to be retreated. Ruptured aneurysms <4 mm, although prevalent in the study (29%), never required retreatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nationwide study results have suggested varying trends in the incidence of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) over time. Herein, trends over time for aSAH treated at a quaternary care center are compared with low-volume hospitals. Cases were retrospectively reviewed for patients with aSAH treated at our institution. Trend analyses were performed on the number of aSAH hospitalizations, treatment type, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Hunt and Hess grade, aneurysm location, aneurysm type, and in-hospital mortality. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried to compare the CCI scores of our patients with those of patients in low-volume hospitals (<20 aSAH/year) in our census division. Some 1248 patients (321 during 2004−2006; 927 during 2008−2018) hospitalized with aSAH were treated with endovascular therapy (489, 39%) or microsurgery (759, 61%). A significant downtrend in the annual aSAH caseload occurred (123 patients in 2004, 75 in 2018, P < 0.001). A linear uptrend was observed for the mean CCI score of patients (R 2 = 0.539, P < 0.001), with no change to in-hospital mortality (R 2 = 0.220, P = 0.24). Mean (standard deviation) CCI for small-volume hospitals treating aSAH within our division was significantly lower than that of our patient population (1.8 [1.6] vs 2.1 [2.0]) for 2012−2015. A decreasing number of patients were hospitalized with aSAH throughout the study. Compared with patients with aSAH admitted in 2004, those admitted more recently were sicker in terms of preexisting comorbidity and neurologic complexity. These trends could be attributable to the increasing availability of neurointerventional services at smaller-volume hospitals capable of treating healthier patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The ideal treatment for unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs) and ruptured dominant VADAs remains controversial. We report our experience in the management and endovascular treatment of patients with VADAs. Methods Patients treated endovascularly for intradural VADAs at a single institution from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Primary neurological outcomes were assessed using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, with mRS >2 considered a poor neurological outcome. Additionally, any worsening (increase) in the mRS score from the preoperative neurological examination was considered a poor outcome. Results Ninety-one patients of mean (SD) age 53 (11.6) years (48 (53%) men) underwent endovascular treatment for VADAs. Fifty-four patients (59%) presented with ruptured VADAs and 44 VADAs (48%) involved the dominant vertebral artery. Forty-seven patients (51%) were treated with vessel sacrifice of the parent artery, 29 (32%) with flow diversion devices (FDDs), and 15 (17%) with stent-assisted coil embolization (stent/coil). Rates of procedural complications and retreatment were significantly higher with stent/coil treatment (complications 4/15; retreatment 6/15) than with vessel sacrifice (complications 1/47; retreatment 2/47) or FDD (complications 2/29; retreatment 4/29) (p=0.008 and p=0.002, respectively). Of 37 patients with unruptured VADAs treated, only two (5%) had mRS scores >2 on follow-up. Conclusion Endovascular FDD treatment of VADAs appears to be associated with lower retreatment and complication rates than stenting/coiling, although further study is required for confirmation. Endovascular treatment of unruptured VADAs was safe and was associated with favorable angiographic and neurological outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Transradial artery (TRA) access for neuroendovascular procedures is associated with fewer complications than transfemoral artery (TFA) access. This study compares hospital costs associated with TRA access to those associated with TFA access for neurointerventions. Methods Elective neuroendovascular procedures at a single center were retrospectively analyzed from October 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019. Hospital costs for each procedure were obtained from the hospital financial department. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean hospital costs after propensity adjustment between patients who underwent TRA compared with TFA access. Results Of the 338 elective procedures included, 63 (19%) were performed through TRA versus 275 (81%) through TFA access. Diagnostic procedures were more common in the TRA cohort (51 of 63, 81%) compared with the TFA cohort (197 of 275, 72%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.48). The TRA cohort had a shorter length of hospital stay (mean (SD) 0.3 (0.5) days) compared with the TFA cohort (mean 0.7 (1.3) days; p=0.02) and lower hospital costs (mean $12 968 ($6518) compared with the TFA cohort (mean $17 150 ($10 946); p=0.004). After propensity adjustment for age, sex, symptoms, angiographic findings, procedure type, sheath size, and catheter size, TRA access was associated with a mean hospital cost of $2514 less than that for TFA access (95% CI -$4931 to -$97; p=0.04). Conclusion Neuroendovascular procedures performed through TRA access are associated with lower hospital costs than TFA procedures. The lower cost is likely due to a decreased length of hospital stay for TRA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment of small ruptured aneurysms (SRAs) remains controversial, with literature reporting difficulty with endovascular versus microsurgical approaches. This paper analyzes outcomes after endovascular coiling and microsurgical clipping among patients with SRAs prospectively enrolled in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial (BRAT). Method: All BRAT patients were included in this study. Patient demographics, aneurysm size, aneurysm characteristics, procedure-related complications, and outcomes at discharge and at 1-year and 6-year follow-up were evaluated. A modified Rankin scale (mRS) score > 2 was considered a poor outcome. Results: Of 73 patients with SRAs, 40 were initially randomly assigned to endovascular coiling and 33 to microsurgical clipping. The rate of treatment crossover was significantly different between coiling and clipping; 25 patients who were assigned to coiling crossed over to clipping, and no clipping patients crossed over to coiling (P < 0.001). Among SRA patients, 15 underwent coiling and 58 underwent clipping; groups did not differ significantly in demographic characteristics or aneurysm type (P ≥ 0.11). Mean aneurysm diameter was significantly greater in the endovascular group (3.0 ± 0.3 vs 2.6 ± 0.6; P = 0.02). The incidence of procedure-related complications was similar for endovascular and microsurgical treatments (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.0 [0.1–10.0], P = 0.98). Both groups had comparable overall outcome (mRS score > 2) at discharge and 1-year and 6-year follow-up (P = 0.48 and 0.73, respectively). Conclusions: Most SRA patients in the BRAT underwent surgical clipping, with a high rate of crossover from endovascular approaches. Endovascular treatment was equivalent to surgical clipping with regard to procedure-related complications and neurologic outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The transradial artery (TRA) approach for neuroendovascular procedures continues to gain popularity, but neurointerventionalists still lag behind interventional cardiologists in the adoption of a TRA-first approach. This study compares the complications and efficiency of the TRA approach to the standard transfemoral artery (TFA) approach at our institution during our initial phase of adopting a TRA-first approach. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on all consecutive neuroangiographic procedures performed at a large cerebrovascular center from October 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. The standard TFA approach was compared with TRA access, with the primary outcome of complications analyzed via a propensity-adjusted analysis. Results A total of 1050 consecutive procedures were performed on 877 patients during this 9-month period; 206 (20%) procedures were performed via TRA and 844 (80%) via TFA. The overall complication rate was significantly higher with the TFA procedures than with the TRA procedures (7% (60/844) vs 2% (4/206), respectively; p=0.003). A propensity-adjusted analysis showed that the TFA approach was a significant risk factor for a complication (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 10.2, p=0.01). However, the propensity analysis showed that fluoroscopy times were on average 4 min less for TFA procedures than for TRA procedures (p=0.003). Conclusion The TRA approach for neuroendovascular procedures appears to be safer than the TFA approach. Although a steep learning curve is initially encountered when adopting the TRA approach, the transition to a TRA-first practice can be performed safely for neurointerventional procedures and may reduce complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite advances in endovascular techniques, microsurgery continues to play an important role in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. This article reviews the history of surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms and the evolving role of microsurgery in the endovascular era. Although endovascular tools and techniques have changed significantly since the placement of the first Guglielmi coils in 1990, with the development of endoluminal flow-diverting stents and now endosaccular flow-diverting devices, microsurgical treatment of aneurysms has also continued to evolve. Since the first treatment with Hunterian ligation by Horsley in the 1800s, surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms has advanced significantly beginning with the introduction of the microscope and microsurgical techniques in the 1950s. More recent advances in microsurgical treatment of aneurysms include microsurgical adjuncts, such as indocyanine green angiography, adenosine, and the exoscope, as well as tailored craniotomies, retractorless surgery, and novel bypass constructs for complex aneurysms. Microsurgery continues to play an important role in the endovascular era. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) involves minimizing expansion of the thrombus and promoting the recanalization of the venous sinus. While current guidelines include indications of endovascular management and anticoagulation with heparin and warfarin, the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased. In this study, we aim to conduct a network meta-analysis comparing these 3 therapeutic options: standard anticoagulation, DOACs, and endovascular treatments (EVTs). Seventeen of 2265 studies identified from 4 publication databases met inclusion criteria for this network meta-analysis. Outcomes analyzed included modified Rankin Scale score, complications, mortality, and 6-month recanalization rates using a frequentist network meta-analysis approach. For each outcome, the preferential order of each intervention was ranked hierarchically based on P-score calculations used for frequentist network meta-analyses. Modified Rankin Scale outcomes were not significantly different based on the type of treatment modality (i.e., standard anticoagulation, DOACs, or EVT). Evaluation of complications demonstrated that patients treated with EVT were significantly more likely to experience a worse outcome than individuals treated with standard anticoagulation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83, P = 0.04). Other comparisons did not demonstrate a significant difference in adverse events. For all-cause mortality outcomes, EVT demonstrated significantly greater odds of mortality than standard anticoagulation (OR = 1.89, P = 0.02). Mortality between DOACs and standard anticoagulation was not significantly different. When comparing 6-month recanalization rates, DOACs and EVT were significantly more effective than standard anticoagulation (OR = 1.93, OR = 2.2, P < 0.05). EVT followed by DOACs was preferred over standard anticoagulation for 6-month recanalization rates. This network meta-analysis evaluates the outcomes in CVT treatment, comparing standard anticoagulation, DOACs, and EVT, with evidence that DOACs have similar outcomes to standard anticoagulation in the treatment of CVT. EVT resulted in an increased risk of overall mortality but improved 6-month recanalization rates. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fourth-generation bypass techniques are novel constructs that may be useful when standard bypass methods fail. 1-3 They involve the use of an unconventional (i.e., intraluminal) suturing technique (type 4A) or vascular orientation (type 4B). 4 We report the use of a type 4B fourth-generation reimplantation bypass for treatment of a recurrent middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm. A woman in her mid-60s presented with recurrence of a previously treated unruptured MCA aneurysm. Her aneurysm was partially coiled, and recurrence developed at the base of the coil mass. Informed consent was obtained from the patient. The MCA bifurcation was exposed with a pterional-transsylvian approach (Video 1). The aneurysm fundus was mobilized to visualize the origin at the bifurcation between the middle and frontal trunk of the MCA. Clip reconstruction was attempted via a "picket-fence" technique. 5 Indocyanine green videoangiography revealed occlusion of the middle trunk. The middle trunk was transected and reimplanted to the frontal trunk in end-side fashion, with intraluminal suturing (type 4A bypass). Indocyanine green videoangiography showed no flow because of endothelial damage from the endovascular therapy. The middle trunk was transected off the frontal trunk and diverted to the temporal trunk, where a type 4B side-to-side reimplantation bypass was performed using a longer arteriotomy to maximize the anastomotic area. Patency and aneurysm occlusion were confirmed with Yellow 560 fluorescence. The patient tolerated the procedure well, and no postoperative neurologic deficits were noted. The fourth-generation bypass concepts allow the surgeon to conceive atypical constructs, which are especially useful for troubleshooting challenging revascularization scenarios. 3 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]