Search

The choice of a suitable joining method is of major importance for the performance and durability of structural connections in any type of construction and in other branches of industry, such as the manufacturing of sliding vehicles. In addition to mechanical joints using high-strength bolts as well as welding, adhesive bonding is more and more being considered as a serious alternative. Hybrid joints are the focus of the research, especially to increase load-bearing capacity and reduce deformation. This project specifically aims at the combination of elementary bonded joints and High Strength Friction Grip Bolts to form the so-called pre-loaded hybrid joint. The pre-loaded hybrid joint optimally combines the specific advantages of both elementary joining methods and thus creates an efficient structural joint. This research takes up the findings of a previous project and focuses on the characterisation of the pre-loaded hybrid joint with regard to its application in the field. For this purpose, a comprehensive experimental test programme is carried out, which served for the validation of a numerical model generated for the computational load prediction in a companion paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Strength prediction of bonded joints remains a challenging task made even further complicated for hybrid joints in which adhesive is supplemented by mechanical fasteners. The present paper complements a series of experimental investigations on hybrid joints combining adhesive bonding with pre-tensioned bolts on galvanised and coated steel substrates, and considering two adhesives. The paper starts with modelling the strength of the bonded connection under the simultaneous action of tensile and compressive normal stresses, and shear. It then presents how these data are moulded into appropriate failure criteria and used the latter as input data for a subsequent full probabilistic finite element analysis. Following the paths of Weibull and subsequent researchers, joint capacity is predicted with reasonable accuracy for a dozen different combinations of substrates, adhesive, and pre-tension level – for which, on average, an accuracy slightly below 10% has been achieved. The results deliver meaningful insights into the subtle relationship between adhesive bonding, mechanical fastening, failure criteria, and resulting predictions methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dimensioning adhesively bonded joints remains a challenging task. Their diversity in geometry and material (including combinations thereof), characteristic stress peaks, scatter and brittleness are aspects few practitioners are prepared to handle for dimensioning purposes. As developed in the first part of this two-part paper, direct stress based methods, despite diverse fudging techniques, proved to be unsuitable. This left the field open for fracture mechanics, which, however, departed very much from the engineering reality leading to only lukewarm acceptance from practitioners. Almost unnoticed, probabilistic methods, much closer to classical mechanics, may offer an alternative. Based upon the presentation, in the first part of this series, of the concepts, the authors suggested an implementation in terms of design procedure. The second part of this two-part paper, is dedicated to the presentation of several examples, from available literature, of adhesively bonded joints involving a large variety of typologies (single and double-lap, tubular, and hybrid joints) and materials (fibre-reinforced polymers, steel, wood). The focus therein is set on practitioner oriented aspects, in particular on techniques for implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adhesive bonding is increasingly being considered by engineers for load-bearing joints to complement, or supplement, traditional mechanical fasteners for a large variety of structural materials, including fibre-reinforced polymers, timber, and steel. However, practitioners are still largely applying analysis and design methods, including codes and standards, that rely heavily on fudge factors. This is not due to the relative novelty of the joining technique, and the complexity of the associated mechanics. This paper guides the reader through some of the most important aspects of adhesively bonded joints, and the reasons why classical mechanics can only be applied in conjunction with fudge factors. Subsequently, the principles of fracture mechanics (FM) are presented; it is shown that, despite its conceptual strengths, FM is rather difficult to implement, as it introduces mechanical concepts practitioners are not familiar with. Then probabilistic methods (PM) are introduced; it is shown that PM can be considered as an extension of classical mechanics, as they can be easily implemented as a post-processing routine of the latter. Additionally, it is shown that PM, unlike FM, neither require specific test procedures for characterisation, nor complicated numerical analyses. Lastly, the paper offers a step-by-step guide for the implementation of PM for the dimensioning of adhesively bonded joints. The second part of this paper illustrates the latter analysis and design of adhesively bonded joints on a series of examples involving FRP, timber, and steel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]