Search

Introduction: Factor VIII inhibitor development is currently the most serious complication of the treatment of haemophilia A. Differences in manufacturing and the molecular structure of brands of recombinant factor VIII have led to speculation that concentrates may differ in immunogenicity. This has led to a regulatory focus on the immunogenicity of factor VIII concentrates both before and after licensure., Aim: To investigate the immunogenicity of ReFacto AF post licensure in a real-world setting in previously untreated patients (PUPs) treated exclusively with this product until at least 50 exposure days (EDs)., Methods: The United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO) National Haemophilia Database (NHD) identified a consecutive cohort of patients with severe haemophilia A (<0.01 IU/L) whose first treatment was with ReFacto AF, monitored time to inhibitor development and described associated risk factors., Results: One hundred and three boys reached 50 EDs within the study period, of whom 35 developed an inhibitor (P(t ≤ 50) = 0.33, [95% CI: 0.25-0.43]), of which 15 (P(t ≤ 50) = 0.16, [95% CI: 0.10-0.25]) were high titre. Inhibitors arose after a median (interquartile range) 11 (7-16) EDs. Inhibitors were significantly associated with high-risk mutations and non-significantly associated with non-white ethnicity. Inhibitors were negatively associated with a family history of haemophilia A. High-titre inhibitors were significantly associated with a family history of inhibitors., Conclusion: Inhibitor incidence in a single country population of ReFacto AF PUPs was similar to that previously described. Low- and high-titre inhibitors were detected after a similar number of EDs, contrasting with previous data, probably reflecting standardized inhibitor monitoring within the United Kingdom., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Enhanced half-life factor VIII and IX products are being introduced into routine clinical practice. Published data report on clinical trials and there are limited data available on how to use these products in routine clinical practice. Many patients, for example, those with a past history of an inhibitor, have been excluded from clinical trials and there are limited data published on children. This guidance document is a consensus statement from the UK Haemophilia Centres Doctors' Organisation and aims to give pragmatic advice on the use of these products in routine practice., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Although it has been suggested that switching of factor VIII (FVIII) products may increase inhibitor formation this is disputed. Half of UK patients changed rFVIII brands because of national contracting in 2010, presenting an opportunity to compare inhibitor incidence of switchers with non-switchers. Centres were requested to test all the patients for inhibitors prior to the switching date and 6-monthly thereafter. Positive and negative inhibitor test data were also collected to analyse for testing bias. A total of 1198 patients with severe haemophilia A and treated with Advate, Kogenate/Helixate or Refacto AF preswitch were included in the analysis, of whom 516 switched to Refacto-AF and 682 did not switch products. Five new inhibitors were reported amongst previously treated patients (>50 exposure days) with a median titre at the time of detection of 1.25 BU mL(-1) (IQR 0.7-23.05). One inhibitor occurred in a non-switcher using Kogenate, an incidence of 1.5 per 1000 treatment-years (95% CI 0.2-10.5). Four inhibitors arose in patients who had switched from Kogenate (two) or Advate (two) to ReFacto-AF, an incidence of 7.8 per 1000 treatment-years (95% CI 2.9-20.8). These incidence rates did not differ significantly from one another (incidence rate ratio 5.3 (95% CI 0.5-260.3) or from the historical rate of 6.05 inhibitors/1000 treatment-years (95% CI 5.18-7.06). Only one inhibitor (non-switcher) persisted. Non-switchers were significantly older (P = 0.03), and used significantly less FVIII per year (P = 0.005) prior to switching. Following switching, factor usage increased similarly (P = 0.53) in both groups. Switching from FLRFVIII to Refacto-AF (BDDRFVIII) was not associated with an increased inhibitor development., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The objective of this study was to examine the association of the intensity of treatment, ranging from high-dose intensive factor VIII (FVIII) treatment to prophylactic treatment, with the inhibitor incidence among previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. This cohort study aimed to include consecutive patients with a FVIII activity < 0.01 IU/mL, born between 2000 and 2010, and observed during their first 75 FVIII exposure days. Intensive FVIII treatment of hemorrhages or surgery at the start of treatment was associated with an increased inhibitor risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-3.0). High-dose FVIII treatment was associated with a higher inhibitor risk than low-dose FVIII treatment (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0-4.8). Prophylaxis was only associated with a decreased overall inhibitor incidence after 20 exposure days of FVIII. The association with prophylaxis was more pronounced in patients with low-risk F8 genotypes than in patients with high-risk F8 genotypes (aHR, 0.61, 95% CI, 0.19-2.0 and aHR, 0.85, 95% CI, 0.51-1.4, respectively). In conclusion, our findings suggest that in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A, high-dosed intensive FVIII treatment increases inhibitor risk and prophylactic FVIII treatment decreases inhibitor risk, especially in patients with low-risk F8 mutations.

The age-adjusted incidence of new factor VIII inhibitors was analyzed in all United Kingdom patients with severe hemophilia A between 1990 and 2009. Three hundred fifteen new inhibitors were reported to the National Hemophilia Database in 2528 patients with severe hemophilia who were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 12 (4-19) years. One hundred sixty (51%) of these arose in patients ≥ 5 years of age after a median (interquartile range) of 6 (4-11) years' follow-up. The incidence of new inhibitors was 64.29 per 1000 treatment-years in patients < 5 years of age and 5.31 per 1000 treatment-years at age 10-49 years, rising significantly (P = .01) to 10.49 per 1000 treatment-years in patients more than 60 years of age. Factor VIII inhibitors arise in patients with hemophilia A throughout life with a bimodal risk, being greatest in early childhood and in old age. HIV was associated with significantly fewer new inhibitors. The inhibitor incidence rate ratio in HIV-seropositive patients was 0.32 times that observed in HIV-seronegative patients (P < .001). Further study is required to explore the natural history of later-onset factor VIII inhibitors and to investigate other potential risk factors for inhibitor development in previously treated patients.

With the advent of modern factor replacement therapy the most important remaining obstacle to successful treatment in haemophilia A is the development of inhibitory antibodies against Facto VIII (FVIII). This retrospective case control study examined genetic variables and early treatment patterns in severe haemophilia A patients who subsequently developed clinically significant inhibitors to FVIII compared with matched controls who did not. Seventy eight inhibitor patients were identified from 13 UK centers over 25 years (1982-2007). For each case an age matched control was selected. Data on potential genetic and treatment related risk factors were collected for cases and controls. Treatment related data was collected for the first 50 exposure days (EDs) for controls or up to inhibitor development for cases. Risk factors were compared for significance by univariate and multivariate analysis. Of the genetic risk factors, major defects in the FVIII gene and non-caucasian ethnicity were each responsible for approximately 5-fold increases in inhibitor risk. When treatment related variables are considered, high intensity treatment increased inhibitor risk around 2.5 fold whether represented by the presence of peak treatment moments or by high overall treatment frequency. This finding was significant regardless of the timing of the high intensity treatment. Periods of intense treatment associated with surgery for porta-cath insertion were however not found to be associated with increased inhibitor risk. No association was shown between inhibitor development and age at first FVIII exposure, type of FVIII product, or the use of regular prophylaxis. This study confirms treatment-related factors as important risks for inhibitor development in Haemophilia A., (© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Consensus-based guidelines supported by the literature are presented on the role of prophylactic administration of factor VIII concentrate in children and adults with severe haemophilia A. The timing of initiation of prophylaxis, the choice of prophylactic regimen, monitoring, management of breakthrough bleeding and education of the patient and family are discussed.

Clinical prediction models for factor VIII inhibitor development may potentially facilitate the identification of patients at high risk of this complication. In particular, recognition of early intensive FVIII replacement therapy as a significant risk factor for inhibitor development has defined a clear clinical decision point that influences patient care. To assess the effect and potential acceptance of a prediction tool for FVIII inhibitor development in clinical practice, a 15-item survey was developed to assess whether these included items were accepted as potential risk factors by the health care providers taking care of these patients. The rating of these items was on a 5-point linear scale, with '1' representing it to be very unlikely and '5' very likely. Responses from 42 centers were available for analysis. These centers were responsible for taking care of 2642 children <18 years with severe hemophilia A. In addition to genetic factors (mean score approximately 4.5), early intensive treatment was considered important for inhibitor development (mean score 4.07). Other factors likely to reduce inhibitor development were early onset of prophylaxis (mean score 3.68) and avoidance of early surgery (mean score 4.05). Physicians also agreed that institution of early prophylaxis and avoidance of elective surgery are important management strategies to reduce inhibitor development (mean scores 3.54 and 4.32, respectively).

Recent reports have suggested that the incidence of inhibitors in haemophilia is the highest in those first exposed to factor VIII under 6 months of age. In this study, we investigated inhibitor development in children first exposed to FVIII as neonates and also examined the effect of other genetic and environmental variables. Three hundred and forty-eight children with severe haemophilia A were investigated. Inhibitors developed in 68 of 348 (20%), with 34 of 348 (10%) high titre inhibitors. The incidence in relation to initial FVIII exposure was: <1 month nine of 35 (26%), 1-6 months 13 of 51 (25%), 6-12 months 27 of 130 (21%), 12-18 months 13 of 66 (20%) and >18 months six of 66 (9%). While we observed a significant difference in inhibitor development and age at first exposure across all age groups (P = 0.018), no significant difference was observed in children treated at different time points during the first year of life (P = 0.44). Similar results were obtained for high titre inhibitors. There was also no difference in the incidence of inhibitors in relation to initial FVIII exposure in a subgroup of 144 children with the intron 22 mutation. Inhibitors developed more frequently in those initially treated with recombinant when compared with plasma-derived FVIII (P = 0.006) and in those with a major molecular defect (P = 0.009). In this study, exposure to FVIII during the neonatal period was not associated with a higher incidence of inhibitors than those treated later during the first year of life. Initial treatment with recombinant FVIII and the presence of a major molecular defect were the most important variables affecting inhibitor development.