1. Treatment patterns and outcomes of unresectable pancreatic cancer patients in real-life practice: a region-wide analysis
- Author
-
Takeshi Urabe, Manabu Yonejima, Hiroshi Kawai, Akito Sakai, Tatsuya Yamashita, Yoshinobu Hinoue, Daisyu Toya, Hajime Ohta, Takeshi Terashima, Yatsugi Noda, Eishiro Mizukoshi, and Shuichi Kaneko
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,endocrine system diseases ,FOLFIRINOX ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Gastroenterology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Japan ,Internal medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Practice Patterns, Physicians' ,Adverse effect ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Retrospective cohort study ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Chemotherapy regimen ,Gemcitabine ,Discontinuation ,Radiation therapy ,Pancreatic Neoplasms ,Treatment Outcome ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,business ,medicine.drug ,Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - Abstract
Background FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have recently been available for treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We investigated trends in characteristics, treatment and outcomes of unselected patients with unresectable PDAC in real-life practice in Japan. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1085 patients diagnosed as having unresectable or recurrent PDAC in multiple centers in the Hokuriku area between January 2009 and July 2015. Results The incidence of pathologically proven PDAC had increased from 18.7% in 2009 to 56.2% in 2015. Oncological therapy was administered to 779 patients (71.8%): chemotherapy (n = 675), chemo-radiotherapy (n = 92) or radiotherapy (n = 12); the remaining patients were treated with best supportive care. Of 100 patients diagnosed in 2009, 62.0% received GEM as first-line chemotherapy; whereas 30.7% of the 75 patients diagnosed in 2015 received FFX, 25.3% GnP, 22.7% GEM and 17.3% S-1. The objective response rates of patients treated with FFX, GnP and GEM were 14.9%, 35.0% and 5.5%, respectively and the OS 10.3, 9.9 and 7.5 months after FFX, GnP and GEM, respectively. Grade 3 or greater any hematological toxicity occurred in 70.2%, 70.0% and 18.8% of the patients treated with FFX, GnP and GEM, respectively. The reasons for treatment discontinuation were adverse events in 9.8%, 26.7% and 24.1% of the patients treated with FFX, GnP and GEM, respectively. Conclusion Chemotherapeutic protocols changed dramatically between 2009 and 2015. Continuous collection and analysis for our cohort with longer follow-up provides useful information about treatment selection and prediction of outcome.
- Published
- 2018