Search

Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common healthcare-associated infection with limited treatment options. Omadacycline, an aminomethylcycline tetracycline, has potent in vitro activity against C difficile and a low propensity to cause CDI in clinical trials. We aimed to assess fecal pharmacokinetics and gut microbiome effects of oral omadacycline compared to oral vancomycin in healthy adults. Methods This was a phase 1, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial conducted in healthy volunteers aged 18–40 years. Subjects received a 10-day course of omadacycline or vancomycin. Stool samples were collected at baseline, daily during therapy, and at follow-up visits. Omadacycline and vancomycin stool concentrations were assessed, and microbiome changes were compared. Results Sixteen healthy volunteers with a mean age of 26 (standard deviation [SD], 5) years were enrolled; 62.5% were male, and participants' mean body mass index was 23.5 (SD, 4.0) kg/m2. Omadacycline was well tolerated with no safety signal differences between the 2 antibiotics. A rapid initial increase in fecal concentrations of omadacycline was observed compared to vancomycin, with maximum concentrations achieved within 48 hours. A significant difference in alpha diversity was observed following therapy in both the omadacycline and vancomycin groups (P <.05). Bacterial abundance and beta diversity analysis showed differing microbiome changes in subjects who received omadacycline versus vancomycin. Conclusions Subjects given omadacycline had high fecal concentrations with a distinct microbiome profile compared to vancomycin. Clinical Trials Registration NCT06030219. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study was the first human validation of the gram-positive bacterial DNA polymerase IIIC target in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection. The primary objectives were to assess clinical cure rates and adverse events (AEs). Secondary objectives were to evaluate plasma/fecal pharmacokinetics, microbiologic eradication, microbiome and bile acid effects, and sustained clinical cure (SCC) with ibezapolstat. Methods This single-arm, open-label, phase 2a study enrolled adults with C. difficile infection at 4 US centers. Patients received ibezapolstat 450 mg orally every 12 hours for 10 days and followed for an additional 28 days to assess study objectives. Results Ten patients with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 49 [15] years were enrolled. Seven AEs were reported classified as mild-moderate. Plasma levels of ibezapolstat ranged from 233 to 578 ng/mL while mean (SD) fecal levels were 416 (494) µg/g stool by treatment day 3 and >1000 µg/g stool by days 8–10. A rapid increase in alpha diversity in the fecal microbiome was noted after starting ibezapolstat therapy, which was maintained after completion of therapy. A proportional decrease in Bacteroidetes phylum was observed (mean change [SD], −10.0% [4.8%]; P  = .04) with a concomitantly increased proportion of Firmicutes phylum (+14.7% [5.4%]; P  = .009). Compared with baseline, total primary bile acids decreased by a mean (SD) of 40.1 (9.6) ng/mg stool during therapy (P  < .001) and 40.5 (14.1) ng/mg stool after completion of therapy (P  = .007). Rates of both initial clinical cure and SCC at 28 days were 100% (10 of 10 patients). Conclusions In this phase 2a study, 10 of 10 patients achieved SCC, demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetics, minimal AEs, and beneficial microbiome and bile acids results. These results support continued clinical development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Antimicrobial pharmacokinetics is an emerging area of gut microbiome research. • Omadacyline is a tetracycline-class antibiotic with potent activity against Clostridioides difficile and a low propensity to cause C. difficile infection. • This study developed and validated a LC-MS/MS method to quantify omadacycline and its epimerization in stool. • A remarkable epimerization of omadacycline was observed in stool samples. This study developed and validated a new liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to quantify omadacycline and its epimerization in stool to facilitate microbiome studies. Omadacycline was extracted in a methanol-water-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (ETDA) solvent containing deuterated omadacycline as internal standard, followed by dilution. In an optimal gradient elution mode, omadacycline and its C4 epimer were separated within 5 min on reversed-phase C18 column. The method showed a broad working range of 0.1–200 ng/ml with a limitation of detection (LOD) of 0.03 ng/ml, little fecal matrix effect, good intra-day and inter-day accuracy (90–101 %), precision (2–15 %), and recovery rate (99–105 %). The method was sufficiently sensitive to quantify omadacycline in human fecal samples (n = 82) collected during a 10-day therapy course and at follow-up (day 13 and day 30) that ranged from 1 to 4785 µg/g. Further analysis revealed that ∼9 % of omadacycline was epimerized in fecal matrix control while, on average, 37.4 % was epimerized in human fecal samples. This study developed and validated a novel, simple, sensitive, and accurate method utilizing LC-MS/MS to quantify omadacycline its epimerization in the human gut. This has important implications for future studies of omadacycline and other tetracycline-class antibiotics as part of gut microbiome studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Fecal bile acid (BA) analysis is an emerging area of gut microbiome research. • Sample preparation procedures for fecal BA analysis are not standardized. • After correcting for water loss fecal BA analysis from original and lyophilized results were comparable. • A single aliquot or original or lyophilized sample can be used for fecal BA analysis. Fecal bile acid (BA) analysis is an emerging area of gut microbiome research. However, sample preparation procedures for fecal BA analysis are not standardized. Current fecal BA analysis often utilizes either original or lyophilized aliquot, and fecal BA result difference between these two processing steps remains not systematically investigated. Moreover, the distribution pattern of fecal BA in the collected stool sample also remains unclear but affects interpretation of fecal BA for downstream experiments. To address these two questions regarding effect of lyophilization on fecal BA and fecal heterogeneity, fourteen separate BAs were quantified from 60 aliquots obtained from 10 clinical fecal samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). BA concentrations in the lyophilized sample were typically 2–4 folds higher than those in the original sample, but were almost identical using a water-adjusted lyophilized BA concentration. The fecal BA compositional profile and four BA ratios were similar utilizing either the original or lyophilized samples. BA concentrations were similar among different aliquots of differing starting mass except for the relatively trace-level BA. Therefore, it is suggested that fecal BA concentrations should be presented as the original sample concentration or water-adjusted lyophilization concentration to allow comparisons between studies. A single aliquot (20–100 mg) of stool can be used to reflect the concentrations in the entire sample. These results help to standardize analyses in this emerging field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]