1. Study of antigen-processing steps reveals preferences explaining differential biological outcomes of two HLA-A2-restricted immunodominant epitopes from human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
- Author
-
Cohen WM, Bianco A, Connan F, Camoin L, Dalod M, Lauvau G, Ferriès E, Culmann-Penciolelli B, van Endert PM, Briand JP, Choppin J, and Guillet JG
- Subjects
- Amino Acid Sequence, Biological Transport, Endopeptidases metabolism, Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte metabolism, Gene Products, gag metabolism, HIV Antigens metabolism, HIV Reverse Transcriptase metabolism, Humans, Immunodominant Epitopes metabolism, Major Histocompatibility Complex, Molecular Sequence Data, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Protein Precursors metabolism, Proteins metabolism, gag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Antigen Presentation immunology, Cysteine Endopeptidases, Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte immunology, Gene Products, gag immunology, HIV Antigens immunology, HIV Infections immunology, HIV Reverse Transcriptase immunology, HIV-1 immunology, HLA-A2 Antigen immunology, Immunodominant Epitopes immunology, Multienzyme Complexes, T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic immunology, Viral Proteins
- Abstract
Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses directed to different human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epitopes vary in their protective efficacy. In particular, HIV-infected cells are much more sensitive to lysis by anti-Gag/p17(77-85)/HLA-A2 than to that by anti-polymerase/RT(476-484)/HLA-A2 CTL, because of a higher density of p17(77-85) complexes. This report describes multiple processing steps favoring the generation of p17(77-85) complexes: (i) the exact COOH-terminal cleavage of epitopes by cellular proteases occurred faster and more frequently for p17(77-85) than for RT(476-484), and (ii) the binding efficiency of the transporter associated with antigen processing was greater for p17(77-85) precursors than for the RT(476-484) epitope. Surprisingly, these peptides, which differed markedly in their antigenicity, displayed qualitatively and quantitatively similar immunogenicity, suggesting differences in the mechanisms governing these phenomena. Here, we discuss the mechanisms responsible for such differences.
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF