Search

Despite the fundamental importance of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to human evolution, there are still large gaps in our understanding of the forces that shape their distribution across the genome. SNPs have been shown to not be distributed evenly, with directly adjacent SNPs found unusually frequently. Why this is the case is unclear. We illustrate how neighboring SNPs that cannot be explained by a single mutation event (that we term here sequential dinucleotide mutations [SDMs]) are driven by distinct processes to SNPs and multinucleotide polymorphisms (MNPs). By studying variation across populations, including a novel cohort of 1,358 Scottish genomes, we show that, SDMs are over twice as common as MNPs and like SNPs display distinct mutational spectra across populations. These biases are not only different to those observed among SNPs and MNPs but are also more divergent between human population groups. We show that the changes that make up SDMs are not independent and identify a distinct mutational profile, CA → CG → TG, that is observed an order of magnitude more often than expected from background SNP rates and the numbers of other SDMs involving the gain and deamination of CpG sites. Intriguingly particular pathways through the amino acid code appear to have been favored relative to that expected from intergenic SDM rates and the occurrences of coding SNPs, and in particular those that lead to the creation of single codon amino acids. We finally present evidence that epistatic selection has potentially disfavored sequential nonsynonymous changes in the human genome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Large-scale gene expression datasets are providing an increasing understanding of the location of cis-eQTLs in the human genome and their role in disease. However, little is currently known regarding the extent of regulatory site-sharing between genes. This is despite it having potentially wide-ranging implications, from the determination of the way in which genetic variants may shape multiple phenotypes to the understanding of the evolution of human gene order. By first identifying the location of non-redundant cis-eQTLs, we show that regulatory site-sharing is a relatively common phenomenon in the human genome, with over 10% of non-redundant regulatory variants linked to the expression of multiple nearby genes. We show that these shared, local regulatory sites are linked to high levels of chromatin looping between the regulatory sites and their associated genes. In addition, these co-regulated gene modules are found to be strongly conserved across mammalian species, suggesting that shared regulatory sites have played an important role in shaping human gene order. The association of these shared cis-eQTLs with multiple genes means they also appear to be unusually important in understanding the genetics of human phenotypes and pleiotropy, with shared regulatory sites more often linked to multiple human phenotypes than other regulatory variants. This study shows that regulatory site-sharing is likely an underappreciated aspect of gene regulation and has important implications for the understanding of various biological phenomena, including how the two and three dimensional structures of the genome have been shaped and the potential causes of disease pleiotropy outside coding regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article explores the structure of the genome within cells in mammals and humans. It notes that between 5% and 15% of the genome in mammals is evolutionarily constrained and is presumably functional. It cites the discovery that the physical organization and structure of the genome within cells casts discernable shadows on the sequence. Researchers also found a large gap between the proportion of the genome thought to be functional.