1. Cytomegalovirus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplant with CMV‐IG prophylaxis: A monocentric retrospective analysis
- Author
-
Paola Bresciani, Monica Pecorari, Andrea Messerotti, Patrizia Comoli, Federico Banchelli, Corrado Colasante, Laura Galassi, Fabio Forghieri, Rachele Giubbolini, Angela Cuoghi, Francesca Bettelli, Roberto D'Amico, Leonardo Potenza, Tommaso Trenti, William Gennari, Roberto Marasca, Valeria Pioli, Mario Luppi, Francesca Donatelli, Andrea Gilioli, Davide Giusti, and Franco Narni
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Human cytomegalovirus ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Cytomegalovirus ,Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation ,Disease ,CMV ,CMV prophylaxis ,CMV-specific immunoglobulins ,hematopoietic stem cell transplantation ,Antibodies, Viral ,Antiviral Agents ,Gastroenterology ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Recurrence ,Virology ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Retrospective analysis ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Seroconversion ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ,virus diseases ,Hematopoietic stem cell ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Infectious Diseases ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Immunoglobulin G ,Cytomegalovirus Infections ,Cohort ,Female ,Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis ,Virus Activation ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,business - Abstract
Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) represents the most common viral infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), mainly occurring as reactivation from latency in seropositive patients, with a different prevalence based on the extent and timing of seroconversion in a specific population. Here, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients who underwent HSCT at our Institution between 2013 and 2018, all of whom were prophylactically treated with CMV-IG (Megalotect Biotest®), to define the incidence and clinical outcomes of CMV reactivation and clinically significant infection. CMV infection occurred in 69% of our patient series, mainly resulting from reactivation, and CMV clinically significant infection (CS-CMVi) occurred in 48% of prophylactically treated patients. CMV infection and CS-CMVi impacted neither on relapse incidence nor on overall survival nor on relapse-free survival. Moreover, a very low incidence of CMV end-organ disease was documented. CMV-IG used alone as prophylactic therapy after HSCT does not effectively prevent CMV reactivation.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF