1. Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler COPD Triple Therapy in Spain: IMPACT Trial
- Author
-
Victoria Federico Paly, Laura Amanda Vallejo-Aparicio, Alan Martin, José Luis Izquierdo, Juan Antonio Riesco, Juan José Soler-Cataluña, Catarina Abreu, Chandroday Biswas, and Afisi S Ismaila
- Subjects
Drug Combinations ,Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ,Spain ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Nebulizers and Vaporizers ,Administration, Inhalation ,Humans ,Fluticasone ,General Medicine ,International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ,Chlorobenzenes ,Benzyl Alcohols - Abstract
Victoria Federico Paly,1 Laura Amanda Vallejo-Aparicio,2 Alan Martin,3 José Luis Izquierdo,4 Juan Antonio Riesco,5 Juan José Soler-Cataluña,6 Catarina Abreu,7 Chandroday Biswas,8 Afisi S Ismaila9,10 1ICON plc, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 2GSK, Madrid, Spain; 3GSK, Brentford, UK; 4Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain; 5Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, Spain; 6Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; 7ICON Plc, New York, NY, USA; 8ICON Plc, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India; 9Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA; 10Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaCorrespondence: Afisi S Ismaila, Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, 19426-0989, USA, Tel +1 919 315 8229, Email afisi.s.ismaila@gsk.comPurpose: Given between-country differences in healthcare systems, treatment costs, and disease management guidelines, country-specific cost-effectiveness analyses are important. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI and UMEC/VI among patients with symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at risk of exacerbations from a Spanish healthcare system perspective.Patients and Methods: Baseline data and treatment effects from the IMPACT trial were populated into the validated GALAXY COPD progression model. Utilities were estimated using Spanish observational data. Direct healthcare costs (2019 â¬) were informed by Spanish public sources. A 3% discount rate for costs and benefits was applied. The time horizon and treatment duration were 3 years (base case). One-way sensitivity, scenario, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.Results: FF/UMEC/VI treatment resulted in fewer exacerbations over 3 years (4.130 vs 3.648) versus FF/VI, with a mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) incremental cost of ⬠444 (⬠149, ⬠713) per patient and benefit of 0.064 (0.053, 0.076) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ⬠6887 per QALY gained. FF/UMEC/VI was a dominant treatment strategy versus UMEC/VI, resulting in fewer exacerbations (4.130 vs 3.360), with a mean (95% CI) incremental cost of â⬠450 (â⬠844, â⬠149) and benefit of 0.054 (0.043, 0.064) QALYs. FF/UMEC/VI was cost-effective versus FF/VI and UMEC/VI across all analyses.Conclusion: FF/UMEC/VI was predicted to be a cost-effective treatment option versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI in symptomatic COPD patients at risk of exacerbations in Spain, across all scenarios and sensitivity analyses.Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cost-effectiveness, single-inhaler triple therapy, Spain, triple inhaled therapy
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF