1. On Behalf of the SFGM-TC: Retrospective Comparison of Reduced and Higher Intensity Conditioning for High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Treated With Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation
- Author
-
Hélène Labussière-Wallet, Stephanie Nguyen-Quoc, Amandine Luc, Thomas Remen, Jacques-Olivier Bay, Edouard Forcade, Rémi Dulery, Marie-Thérèse Rubio, Célestine Simand, Micha Srour, Maud d'Aveni, Ambroise Marçais, Sabine Furst, Arnaud Campidelli, Patrice Ceballos, Etienne Daguindau, Marie Robin, Pascal Turlure, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy), Hopital Saint-Louis [AP-HP] (AP-HP), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Laboratoire d'Hématologie et d'Immunologie [CHU Saint-Antoine], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-CHU Saint-Antoine [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille), CHU Saint-Eloi, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque [CHU Bordeaux], CHU Bordeaux [Bordeaux], Service d'Hématologie Biologique [CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière], CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], Sorbonne Université (SU)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC), Hôpital Dupuytren [CHU Limoges], CHU Estaing [Clermont-Ferrand], CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), CHU Necker - Enfants Malades [AP-HP], and Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon (CHRU Besançon)
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Transplantation Conditioning ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Conditioning regimen ,Risk Factors ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Transplantation, Homologous ,Overall survival ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ,Hematology ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Survival Analysis ,Allogeneic stem cell transplantation ,3. Good health ,Fludarabine ,Transplantation ,Covariate adjustment using the propensity ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Graft-versus-host disease ,Myelodysplastic Syndromes ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Propensity score matching ,Female ,Bone marrow ,Stem cell ,business ,Myelodysplastic syndrome ,[SDV.MHEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology ,Busulfan ,030215 immunology ,medicine.drug - Abstract
International audience; BackgroundAllogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the best curative option for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome . We retrospectively compared patient outcomes after allo-HSCT according to the intensity of the conditioning regimen.Patients and MethodsThree conditioning regimens were compared in 427 patients allografted for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), fludarabine (150-160 mg/m2) and busulfan (6.4 mg/kg); sequential FLAMSA-RIC, fludarabine, amsacrine, and aracytine followed by RIC; and myeloablative with reduced toxicity (RTC), fludarabine and busulfan (9.6 mg/kg or 12.8 mg/kg).ResultsThe patients in the 3 conditioning groups were different in regards to the number of treatment lines (P< .001), percentage of blasts in bone marrow (P< .001), and disease status at transplantation (P< .001). No significant differences in outcomes (overall survival, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, relapse incidence, and graft versus host disease relapse-free survival) were observed between the 3 groups. Using propensity score analysis to overcome baseline imbalances, we compared 70 patients receiving FLAMSA-RIC to 260 patients receiving RIC, and compared 83 patients receiving RTC to 252 patients receiving RIC. The only factor influencing overall and progression-free survival was cytogenetic risk at transplantation. After the covariate adjustment using propensity score to reduce baseline imbalances, the only factor influencing overall and progression-free survival was still cytogenetic risk at transplantation.ConclusionOverall survival appears to be similar with the 3 conditioning regimens. The only factor influencing survival is cytogenetic risk at transplantation, suggesting that new promising drugs in the conditioning and/or early interventions after transplantation are needed to improve outcomes in these patients.
- Published
- 2022