Search

Capecitabine is important in breast cancer treatment but causes diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome (HFS), affecting adherence and quality of life. We sought to identify pharmacogenomic predictors of capecitabine toxicity using a novel monitoring tool. Patients with metastatic breast cancer were prospectively treated with capecitabine (2000 mg/m2/day, 14 days on/7 off). Patients completed in-person toxicity questionnaires (day 1/cycle) and automated phone-in assessments (days 8, 15). Correlation of genotypes with early and overall toxicity was the primary endpoint. Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were enrolled (14 institutions). Diarrhea and HFS occurred in 52% (17% grade 3) and 69% (9% grade 3), respectively. Only 29% of patients completed four cycles without dose reduction/interruption. In 39%, the highest toxicity grade was captured via phone. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with diarrhea—DPYD*5 (odds ratio [OR] 4.9; P = 0.0005), a MTHFR missense SNP (OR 3.3; P = 0.02), and a SNP upstream of MTRR (OR 3.0; P = 0.03). GWAS elucidated a novel HFS SNP (OR 3.0; P = 0.0007) near TNFSF4 (OX40L), a gene implicated in autoimmunity including autoimmune skin diseases never before implicated in HFS. Genotype-gene expression analyses of skin tissues identified rs11158568 (associated with HFS via GWAS) with expression of CHURC1, a transcriptional activator controlling fibroblast growth factor (beta = − 0.74; P = 1.46 × 10–23), representing a previously unidentified mechanism for HFS. This is the first cancer pharmacogenomic study to use phone-in self-reporting, permitting augmented toxicity characterization. Three germline toxicity SNPs were replicated, and several novel SNPs/genes having strong functional relevance were discovered. If further validated, these markers could permit personalized capecitabine dosing.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) improves outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) though most patients progress. There are limited data regarding molecular predictors of progression. In particular, there is controversy regarding the role of CDKN2A loss-of-function (LOF) in ICB resistance. We analyzed 139 consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent NGS prior to ICB initiation to explore the association of CDKN2A LOF with clinical outcomes. 73% were PD-L1 positive (≥ 1%). 48% exhibited high TMB (≥ 10 mutations/megabase). CDKN2A LOF was present in 26% of patients and was associated with inferior PFS (multivariate hazard ratio [MVA-HR] 1.66, 95% CI 1.02–2.63, p = 0.041) and OS (MVA-HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.21–3.49, p = 0.0087) when compared to wild-type (WT) patients. These findings held in patients with high TMB (median OS, LOF vs. WT 10.5 vs. 22.3 months; p = 0.069) and PD-L1 ≥ 50% (median OS, LOF vs. WT 11.1 vs. 24.2 months; p = 0.020), as well as in an independent dataset. CDKN2A LOF vs. WT tumors were twice as likely to experience disease progression following ICB (46% vs. 21%; p = 0.021). CDKN2A LOF negatively impacts clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC treated with ICB, even in high PD-L1 and high TMB tumors. This novel finding should be prospectively validated and presents a potential therapeutic target.

Background S1400D is a biomarker-driven therapeutic substudy of Lung-MAP evaluating the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR) inhibitor AZD4547 in patients with FGF pathway-activated squamous cell. This is the first phase II trial to evaluate AZD4547 as a targeted approach in patients with previously treated FGFR-altered squamous cell NSCLC and is the first demonstration of successful implementation and conduct of a national umbrella protocol in this disease setting. Methods Eligible patients had tumoral FGFR alteration or mutation and had progressive disease after at least one line of platinum-based systemic therapy. Patients received AZD4547 80 mg twice daily orally. Primary endpoint was response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and duration of response (DoR). Results Ninety-two patients were assigned to S1400D, 43 were enrolled, and 27 AZD4547-treated patients were evaluable. Evaluable patients were predominantly white (n = 24, 89%), median age 66 years (range, 49–88 years old), and female (n = 7, 26%). FGFR alterations included FGFR1 amplification (n = 23; 85%), FGFR3 amplification (n = 2; 7%), FGFR3 S249C (n = 2; 7%), and FGFR3 fusion (n = 1; 4%). Treatment with ADZ4547 was well tolerated; grade 3 adverse events occurred in six patients, and one patient had grade 4 sepsis. Of 27 response-evaluable patients, 1 patient with FGFR3 S249C had unconfirmed partial response with a DoR of 1.5 months and 1 patient with FGFR1 amplification had a confirmed partial response with a DoR of 2.9 months (7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0%–17%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival for the AZD4547-treated cohort were 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.4– 4.5 months) and 7.5 months (95% CI: 3.7–9.3 months). Conclusions AZD4547 had an acceptable safety profile but minimal activity in this predominantly FGFR1/FGFR3–amplified cohort. Evaluation of other targeted agents in Lung-MAP is ongoing.

Previous studies have evaluated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic patients with NSCLC, including multimodality treatment with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 monotherapy. Questions remain regarding the timing of SBRT and immunotherapy, safety with dual checkpoint blockade, and the utility in widely metastatic patients. This randomized phase 1 trial combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with sequential or concurrent multisite SBRT in patients with stage IV NSCLC to evaluate safety and obtain preliminary activity data.Treatment-naive patients with metastatic NSCLC were randomized to concurrent (SBRT with immunotherapy) or sequential (SBRT followed by immunotherapy) treatment. A maximum of four treatment fields received SBRT. Nivolumab and ipilimumab were continued until clinical progression, development of toxicity, or after 2 years. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as greater than or equal to grade 3 toxicity to the relevant organ system attributed to SBRT and immunotherapy occuring within 3 months.A total of 37 patients were assessable. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred in the concurrent cohort (n = 18). The sequential cohort required a dose reduction in the central lung group owing to two grade 4 pneumonitis events (2 of 19). Overall best response was as follows: 5.4% (2 of 37) complete response, 40.5% (15 of 37) partial response, 16.2% (6 of 37) stable disease, and 37.8% (14 of 37) progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval: 3.6-11.4 mo), with median follow-up of 17.0 months. Median overall survival was not reached.Concurrent nivolumab, ipilimumab, and SBRT were not more toxic than sequential therapy, and multisite SBRT was well tolerated in widely metastatic patients. Multimodality therapy resulted in durable metastasis control and encouraging early overall survival.

This study reviews extensive genetic analysis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in order to: describe how targetable mutation genes interrelate with the genes identified as variants of unknown significance; assess the percentage of patients with a potentially targetable genetic alterations; evaluate the percentage of patients who had concurrent alterations, previously considered to be mutually exclusive; and characterize the molecular subset of KRAS. Thoracic Oncology Research Program Databases at the University of Chicago provided patient demographics, pathology, and results of genetic testing. 364 patients including 289 adenocarcinoma underwent genotype testing by various platforms such as FoundationOne, Caris Molecular Intelligence, and Response Genetics Inc. For the entire adenocarcinoma cohort, 25% of patients were African Americans; 90% of KRAS mutations were detected in smokers, including current and former smokers; 46% of EGFR and 61% of ALK alterations were detected in never smokers. 99.4% of patients, whose samples were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), had genetic alterations identified with an average of 10.8 alterations/tumor throughout different tumor subtypes. However, mutations were not mutually exclusive. NGS in this study identified potentially targetable genetic alterations in the majority of patients tested, detected concurrent alterations and provided information on variants of unknown significance at this time but potentially targetable in the future.

Purpose Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) –tyrosine kinase inhibitors have proven efficacy in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesized that erlotinib would be efficacious in the adjuvant setting. Patients and Methods An international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in patients with completely resected IB to IIIA NSCLC whose tumors expressed EGFR protein by immunohistochemistry or EGFR amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Patients were assigned 2:1 to erlotinib 150 mg once per day or placebo for 2 years. Stratification factors were stage, histology, previous adjuvant chemotherapy, smoking status, EGFR amplification status, and country. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS); key secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and DFS and OS in patients whose tumors had EGFR-activating mutations (EGFRm-positive). Results A total of 973 patients were randomly assigned (November 26, 2007, to July 7, 2010). There was no statistically significant difference in DFS (median, 50.5 months for erlotinib and 48.2 months for placebo; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.10; P = .324). Among the 161 patients (16.5%) in the EGFRm-positive subgroup, DFS favored erlotinib (median, 46.4 v 28.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.98; P = .039), but this was not statistically significant because of the hierarchical testing procedure. OS data are immature. Rash and diarrhea were common adverse events occurring in 528 (86.4%) and 319 (52.2%) patients treated with erlotinib, respectively, versus 110 (32.1%) and 54 (15.7%) patients receiving placebo. The most common grade 3 adverse events in patients treated with erlotinib were rash (22.3%) and diarrhea (6.2%). Conclusion Adjuvant erlotinib did not prolong DFS in patients with EGFR-expressing NSCLC or in the EGFRm-positive subgroup. Further evaluation of erlotinib is warranted in the EGFRm-positive subgroup.

Introduction: Outcomes data treating patients with oligometastatic (⩽5 metastases) non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (HIGRT) are limited. Methods: Consecutive oligometastatic NSCLC patients were reviewed from a prospective database. Patients were included if all active diseases were treated with HIGRT. Lesions that had received prior radiation or had radiographic/metabolic resolution after chemotherapy were not treated with HIGRT. Local control of all treated lesions, distant control, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and control of individual lesions (LeC) were calculated. Results: Twenty-five patients with median of 2 treated oligometastatic lesions were included. Median follow-up was 14 months. Median age was 66 years. Nineteen patients received systemic therapy before HIGRT and 11 had progressive disease after their most recent systemic therapy before HIGRT. Median OS and PFS were 22.7 and 7.6 months. The 18 months local control, distant control, OS, and PFS were 66.1%, 31.7%, 52.9%, and 28.0%. Greater than two sites treated with HIGRT, nonadenocarcinoma histology, prior systemic therapy, and progression after systemic therapy were associated with worse PFS. Sixty-two individual lesions of median size 2.7 cm were treated. For extracranial lesions, median total and fraction dose were 50 and 5 Gy. Median standard equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions for extracranial lesions was 64.6 Gy yielding 18 months LeC of 70.7%. Standard equivalent dose ≥64.6 Gy increased LeC ( p = 0.04). Two patients experienced grade 3 toxicity. Conclusions: HIGRT for oligometastatic NSCLC provides durable LeC and may provide long-term PFS in some patients. Future HIGRT studies should optimize patient selection and integration with systemic therapy.

Introduction Treatment of technically operable, medically fit locoregionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is a controversial therapeutic challenge. Our group routinely uses a trimodality approach. Recent advances in radiotherapy allow for improved tumor targeting and daily patient positioning. We hypothesized that these technologies would improve pathologic response rates. We analyzed consecutively treated stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy before major lung resection, with particular attention paid to the impact of advanced technologies. Methods Locoregionally advanced NSCLC patients (N2) staged in a multidisciplinary forum with mediastinoscopy were planned to receive platinum-based chemotherapy and 60 Gy and major lung resection. Four-dimensional CT (4DCT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) were used as available. Survival endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards models. Results We identified 53 patients from 2/1999 to 2/2010. Median RT dose was 59 Gy. 68% underwent lobectomy. Forty-three patients were downstaged pathologically (81%), 38 experienced mediastinal sterilization (72%), and 21 (40%) had complete pathologic response (pCR). 1 and 2 year OS were 85.5% and 61.6%. Superior OS and DFS were associated with nodal downstaging and mediastinal sterilization (pN0). Treatment with IGRT/4DCT in 10 patients resulted in high rates of nodal downstaging (100% vs 77%, p = 0.0452), mediastinal sterilization (90% vs 67%, p = 0.0769), and pCR (60% vs 35%, p = 0.0728). Conclusions In selected patients, definitive dose CRT followed by major lung resection results in promising DFS and OS. The use of advanced radiotherapy techniques (4DCT and IGRT) appears to result in promising pathologic response rates.

Lung cancer is a heterogenous group of disorders, and a difficult disease to treat. The traditional approach of surgical resection for early-stage disease, potentially followed by chemotherapy, as well chemotherapy (with or without radiation) in later stages of disease is being supplemented with a personalized approach. The personalized approach has classically been used by the oncologist based on clinical/pathological parameters such as the performance status of the patient and histology of lung cancer. As molecular mechanisms have been explored in lung cancer more recently, the personalized approach also has incorporated molecular abnormalities. In particular, EGFR, K-ras, ALK, MET, CBL, and COX2, have come to the forefront as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Thus, we review the various molecular mechanisms in lung cancer and the role of novel therapeutics.

We performed a phase II trial to evaluate a docetaxel-based regimen in locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer. Untreated stage II-IVa esophageal cancer patients with performance status 0-2 were included. Tumor resectability was determined prior to initiation of study. Induction docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) day 1 with prophylactic filgrastim was delivered every 21 days for 3 cycles. Subsequent concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) utilized weekly docetaxel (20 mg/m(2)) and concurrent radiotherapy (2 Gy/day) in resectable/resected patients (50 Gy) and in unresectable patients (66 Gy). A total of 78 patients (15 squamous cell carcinoma, 60 adenocarcinoma, 3 mixed/undifferentiated; 68 men, 10 women; median age 61 years) were accrued. The regimen was administered to 59 (76%) potentially resectable patients and 13 (17%) unresectable patients; 6 patients (8%) received the regimen post-operatively. Response rate in 66 evaluable patients following induction chemotherapy was 30%. Sixty-nine patients underwent CRT. Ten patients had disease progression during CRT. Forty-five out of 59 potentially resectable patients underwent esophagectomy after CRT, and 42 patients had complete tumor resection with negative margins. Eighteen out of 59 patients who were potentially resectable patients had pathologic complete response (pCR-31%). Grade 3/4 toxicity during induction chemotherapy included leucopenia, neutropenia, vomiting, and neuropathy. Esophagitis was the predominant toxicity during CRT. Median overall survival was 11.4 months for unresectable patients, 14.3 months for resectable patients and 10.4 months for patients who received the regimen post-operatively (log-rank P = 0.2492). Docetaxel-based CRT regimen is active and tolerable in esophageal cancer. The observed pCR in the potentially resectable group indicates good local control.

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is most often idiopathic. However, in recent years, AIHA has been noted with increased incidence in patients receiving purine nucleoside analogues for hematologic malignancies; it has also been described as a complication of blood transfusion in patients who have also had alloimmunization. As the technology of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has become more widespread, immune hemolysis in the recipients of ABO-mismatched products has become better recognized. The syndrome is caused by passenger lymphocytes transferred from the donor, and although transient, can be quite severe. A similar syndrome has been observed in recipients of solid organ transplants when there is ABO-incompatibility between donor and recipient. Venous thromboembolism is a little-recognized, though likely common, complication of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), and may in some instances be related to coexistent antiphospholipid antibodies. While AIHA is a well-documented complication of malignant lymphoproliferative disorders, lymphoproliferative disorders may also paradoxically appear as a consequence of AIHA. A number of newer options are available for treatment of AIHA in patients refractory to corticosteroids and splenectomy. Newer immunosuppressives such as mycophenolate may have a role in such cases. Considerable experience has been accumulating in the last few years with monoclonal antibody therapy, specifically rituximab, in difficult AIHA cases; it appears to be a safe and effective option.

Background The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), and determine the phase II dose for the combination of irinotecan-carboplatin-paclitaxel given as induction chemotherapy and with concomitant chest radiotherapy for patients with Stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Methods Patients with Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status of 0 to 2, stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC patients with resectable or unresectable disease were treated with induction chemotherapy (irinotecan 100 mg/m 2 , carboplatin AUC 5, and paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 days 1 and 22) followed by concomitant chemotherapy (irinotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel) and chest radiotherapy (66 Gy for unresectable and 50 Gy for resectable disease) beginning on week 7. The primary objective was to escalate the dose of irinotecan during chemoradiation in sequential cohorts to determine the DLT and MTD of the regimen. Results Thirty-eight patients were enrolled (median age 63 years, 57% male, 41% performance status 0, 30% resectable). Induction chemotherapy was tolerable and active (response rate 26%; stable disease 60%). Eight patients did not receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy because of progressive disease (5), death (1), hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel (1), and withdrawal of consent (1). Twenty-nine patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The concomitant administration of chest radiotherapy with weekly irinotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel was not feasible at the first, second, and third dose levels. DLT was failure to achieve recovery to ≤ grade 1 absolute neutrophil count by the day of scheduled chemotherapy administration. Dose de-escalation to irinotecan 30 mg/m 2 , paclitaxel 40 mg/m 2 (with omission of carboplatin) delivered on weeks 2, 3, 5, and 6 of radiotherapy was the MTD. After induction chemotherapy, partial responses, stable disease, and progressive disease was observed in 26%, 60%, and 14% of patients, respectively. After chemoradiotherapy, partial responses were attained in 16 (55%) patients, whereas 12 patients (41%) attained disease stabilization. Median overall survival was 21 months for the entire cohort. Resectable patients had a median survival of 24 months, whereas unresectable patients had a median survival of 19 months. Differences in overall and progression-free survival rates between resectable and unresectable patients was not statistically significant ( p = 0.52 and p = 0.90, respectively). Discussion Carboplatin, paclitaxel, and irinotecan with concurrent chemoradiotherapy was poorly tolerated as a result of neutropenia. Although dose de-escalation was required for delivery of the regimen, the response rates and survival outcomes were comparable to other similar regimens.

For locally advanced but technically operable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is frequently used. Ideal radiotherapy dose in this context is unclear.Twenty-six NSCLC patients with N2 disease were retrospectively reviewed. All received preoperative concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. Gross tumor volumes received a median of 58 Gy (range, 50-60 Gy).Two patients experienced major complications and died, resulting in a postoperative mortality rate of 7.7%. Three patients (11.5%) had minor complications. Pathologic specimens revealed downstaging in 76.9% of patients. The pathologic complete response (CR) rate was 34.6%. Downstaging of nodes was observed in 20 of 26 patients. With a median follow-up of 18.3 months, the 1- and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 80.2% and 45.7%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 76.9% and 37.3%, respectively. Patients experiencing mediastinal downstaging had better DFS rates, relative to patients that did not (18-month DFS = 79.2% vs. 0%; P = 0.0001). Differences in RT dose (50-60 Gy) and types of chemotherapeutic regimens did not significantly impact pathologic downstaging rates, CR rates, DFS, or survival.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with high-dose concurrent RT is well tolerated and results in favorable outcomes.

Purpose: The primary objective of this phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose for pemetrexed, alone and in combination with carboplatin, with concurrent radiotherapy.Experimental Design: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or esophageal cancer were treated every 21 days for two cycles. Regimen 1 was pemetrexed (200-600 mg/m2); regimen 2 was pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) with escalating carboplatin doses (AUC = 4-6). Both regimens included concurrent radiation (40-66 Gy; palliative-intent doses were lower).Results: Thirty patients (18 locally advanced and 12 metastatic with dominant local symptoms) were enrolled, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1/2 (n = 8/21/1). All dose levels were tolerable for regimen 1 (n = 18: 15 NSCLC and 3 esophageal cancers) and regimen 2 (n = 12: all NSCLC). In regimen 1, one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 esophagitis/anorexia) occurred (500 mg/m2). Grade 3 neutropenia (3 of 18 patients) was the main hematologic toxicity. In regimen 2, one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 esophagitis) occurred (500 mg/m2; AUC = 6); grade 3/4 leukopenia (4 of 12 patients) was the main hematologic toxicity. Four complete responses (2 pathology proven) and eight partial responses were observed. When systemically active chemotherapy doses were reached, further dose escalation was discontinued, and a phase II dose-range was established (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 5-6).Conclusions: The combination of pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC = 5 or 6) with concurrent radiation is well tolerated, allows for the administration of systemically active chemotherapy doses, and shows signs of activity. To further determine efficacy, safety profile, and optimal dosing, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 30407 is currently evaluating this regimen in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Purpose Bcl-2 is expressed in the majority of cases of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and may contribute to chemotherapeutic resistance. Bcl-2 suppression by G3139 (oblimersen sodium), a phosphorothioate oligonucleotide complementary to the bcl-2 mRNA, has the potential to enhance the antitumor efficacy of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. A dose-finding study was performed evaluating the combination of G3139, carboplatin, and etoposide in patients with previously untreated extensive stage SCLC. Patients and Methods Sixteen patients were treated in three consecutive cohorts. Cohort 1 (n = 5) received G3139 5 mg/kg/d on days 1 to 8 of a 21 day cycle, with carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) = 6 on day 6, and etoposide 80 mg/m2/d on days 6 to 8. In cohort 2 (n = 4), carboplatin dose was reduced to AUC = 5. In cohort 3 (n = 7), G3139 dose was escalated to 7 mg/kg/d. G3139 plasma concentrations and Bcl-2 protein levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were evaluated. Results Two of three assessable patients in cohort 1 experienced cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 neutropenia). No cycle 1 dose-limited toxicity was observed in cohorts 2 or 3. Of 14 patients assessable for response, partial response was documented in 12 patients (86%), and stable disease in two. Median time to progression was 5.9 months. Carboplatin and etoposide administration did not appear to alter G3139 pharmacokinetics. No evidence of Bcl-2 suppression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was observed. Conclusion The combination of G3139, carboplatin, and etoposide is well tolerated and results in an encouraging response rate and time to progression in patients with extensive stage SCLC.

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and tolerability of the three-drug combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and carboplatin (TIC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The specific objectives of the study were: (i) to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum-tolerated dose of ifosfamide administered as part of the combination; and (ii) to determine the overall response rate and overall survival of patients treated with this regimen. Patients and methods Patients with untreated, stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled in one of three cohorts. Patients received paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 as a 1-h infusion on day 1 with carboplatin at an area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) of 6 mg·min/ml on day 2. For dose level I, ifosfamide was administered at a dose of 2 g/m2 on days 1 and 2. For dose levels II and III, the dose of ifosfamide was decreased to 1.5 g/m2 on days 1 and 2 and the dose of carboplatin was decreased to AUC 5 mg·ml/min. Therapy for dose levels I and III included filgrastim support (5 µg/kg/day), which was initiated on day 3 and continued until after day 11 or until an absolute neutrophil count >10 000/µl. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days. Once the phase II dose was established, a full cohort of patients received therapy at this dose level to examine further the regimen’s activity and tolerability. Results Neutropenia was the DLT encountered for dose levels I and II. No DLT was encountered inthe initial six patients treated at dose level III, and therefore this dose level was declared the recommended phase II dose. A total of 49 patients were treated at the recommended phase II dose. The predominant non-hematological toxicity encountered with this triplet regimen was cumulative peripheral neuropathy. Of the 65 eligible patients enrolled in this study, 17 (26%) responded. There were 15 patients with partial responses (23%), two with regression, and 26 with stabilization of disease (40%). Median progression-free and overall survival were 4.8 and 9.4 months, respectively. Conclusions The combination TIC is well-tolerated. This triplet regimen produced response and survival rates in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer similar to those of other current combination chemotherapy regimens.

Background: Bryostatin-1 is a macrocyclic lactone, which exhibits pleiotropic biological effects via protein kinase C and has shown preclinical synergy with paclitaxel for enhanced tumor cell apoptosis. Patients and Methods: Patients had stage IIIB (pleural effusion)/IV non-small cell lung cancer, measurable disease, performance status 0–2 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, adequate organ function, and no prior chemotherapy. Patients received dexamethasone premedication followed by paclitaxel at a dose of 90 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, and 15 along with bryostatin-1 50 μg/m 2 on days 2, 9, and 16 every 28 days until disease progression. Correlative assays measuring serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and T-lymphocyte numbers were performed based on a previous study showing cytokine induction in vivo by bryostatin-1. Fifteen patients were enrolled. Results: Thirty cycles of the bryostatin-1 and paclitaxel were delivered with a median of 2 per patient (range 1–4). Myalgia was the predominant non-hematologic toxicity encountered as 3 patients developed grade 4 and 1 patient developed grade 3 myalgia. Four patients were removed from the study during cycle 1 for rapid disease progression or myalgia. Eleven patients could be evaluated for response. Five patients had stable disease, two had a mixed response, and four had progressive disease. Ten patients received second-line chemotherapy after leaving the study. Median survival was 31 weeks (95% confidence interval: 5.4–49.3). Correlative data showed a trend towards decreased plasma IL-6 and TNF-α after each cycle of therapy presumably due to the dexamethasone premedication and/or paclitaxel. Conclusions: This drug combination showed no significant clinical response and was associated with reproducible toxicity. The predominance of myalgia in the absence of elevated serum cytokines suggests a non-inflammatory etiology of this toxicity.

In a previous phase II trial of the synthetic topoisomerase I inhibitor, 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC), given as a 72-h infusion, we identified modest single agent activity of 9% in patients with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical studies suggested that a more prolonged continuous infusion of the drug might lead to greater antitumor activity. A phase I study recommended a phase II dose of 25 microg/m2/hr for 120 h (3000 microg/m2 over 5 days), administered for 2 consecutive weeks of a 3-week cycle. We utilized this schedule and enrolled 13 chemotherapy-naïve patients with Stage IIIB and IV NSCLC in this trial: median age 67 (range 57-74); 46% male; 92% stage IV; and median performance status 1. Twelve patients are available for response and toxicity evaluation after 2 cycles of therapy. One patient achieved a partial response. Four patients had stable disease while seven patients had progressive disease. Patients with stable or progressive disease after two cycles received no additional 9-AC, and were offered conventional chemotherapy. The median survival time was 10.2 months and the one-year survival rate 28% (95% confidence interval, 5-58%). Significant toxicities included myelosuppression, fatigue, and anorexia. One patient had grade 4 neutropenia following the first week of cycle 2, and did not receive additional therapy. There were no neutropenia-related infections. These data suggest that this prolonged schedule is unlikely to increase 9-AC's very modest activity in NSCLC above that seen with the simpler 72-h administration schedule. Further evaluation of 9-AC in NSCLC is not recommended.

JM216 is an orally administered platinum analogue. We undertook this study to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of JM216 when administered with concomitant radiotherapy to the chest (200 cGy daily, 5 x/week) in patients with locoregionally advanced non-small cell lung (NSCLC) or esophageal cancer. Patients were excluded for inadequate bone marrow reserve, prior radiotherapy to the primary tumor or previous treatment with platinum drugs. A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) and consisted of gradeor = 2 renal, hepatic, cardiac, or pulmonary toxicity or gradeor = 3 hematologic, neurological, or gastrointestinal toxicity. A total of 23 patients were registered; two never received treatment and are excluded from analyses. Six patients were treated at a dose of 30 mg/m2/day for 5 days with two grade 2 DLT's: cough (1 pt) and elevated trans-aminases (1 pt). Seven evaluable patients were treated at 60 mg/m2/day and seven experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity, five related to myelosuppression. The dose was then reduced to 45 mg/m2/d. Eight patients were evaluable for toxicity, of which 5 experienced DLT: myelosuppression (3 pts), esophagitis (2 pts), dyspnea (1 pt), and elevated creatinine (1 pt). Fourteen patients were evaluable for efficacy, of which 6 had an objective response, including one complete response. The recommended phase II dose of JM216 with concurrent radiation therapy is 30 mg/m2/d for 5 days. The major DLT is myelosuppression with only limited increased toxicity within the field of radiation. This conceivably may limit the use of JM216 as a radiation sensitizer.

PURPOSE The cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen has superior activity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I trial to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of this regimen with concomitant thoracic radiation (RT) in patients with advanced chest malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced chest malignancies that required RT were enrolled onto this phase I study of standard chest radiation (30 daily 2-Gy fractions for a total of 60 Gy) and concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin starting at 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and vinorelbine starting at 20 mg/m2/wk. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients were treated on this study. Two of three patients treated at the maximum-administered dose of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 per cycle and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2/wk experienced acute DLT (neutropenia), which required deescalation. The dose level of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/wk, although tolerated acutely, produced delayed esophagitis, which proved dose-limiting. The recommended phase II dose was cisplatin 80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and vinorelbine 15 mg/m2 given 2 of every 3 weeks with concomitant chest RT. CONCLUSION Concomitant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine is feasible. The recommended phase II dose is cisplatin 80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with vinorelbine 15 mg/m2 given twice over 3 weeks on a day 1/day 8 schedule. Esophagitis is the DLT, with neutropenia occurring at higher dose levels. A Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) phase II trial is currently underway to evaluate further the efficacy and toxicities of this regimen in unresectable stage III NSCLC.

PURPOSE We designed a phase I dose-escalation study of vinorelbine on a novel (daily-times-three) schedule with ifosfamide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support to define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine in this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS Cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no prior chemotherapy received vinorelbine starting at 15 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3, and ifosfamide starting at 2.0 g/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3 with G-CSF support for all patients. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Plasma vinorelbine concentrations were also analyzed. RESULTS Forty-two patients were treated. The median age was 58 years (range, 34 to 75) and 41 had a performance status of 0 or 1. The DLT was neutropenia and sepsis at a maximum-administered vinorelbine dose of 35 mg/m2 for 3 days. The recommended phase II dose was vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.6 g/m2 both given on 3 consecutive days. The overall response rate was 40% (17 of 42; all partial responders). The median survival duration was 50 weeks, with a 1-year survival rate of 48%. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that vinorelbine in this combination and on this schedule is cleared 1.5 to two times faster than in single-agent once-weekly studies. CONCLUSION Myelosuppression is the DLT of this regimen with no major subjective toxicities. With tolerable toxicity and an encouraging 1-year survival rate of 48%, further investigation of this new vinorelbine schedule is warranted in this and other combination regimens.

A combination of oral 13-cis-retinoic acid (cis-RA) and subcutaneous interferon alfa-2a (IFN) has been reported to yield high response rates in patients with squamous cell carcinomas (SCCAs) of the cervix and skin. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin (5-FU/LV) are chemotherapeutic agents commonly used for SCCAs. Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of cisplatin and 5-FU/LV when combined with IFN and cis-RA, and to define a recommended phase II regimen for testing in cervical cancer and other appropriate tumor types. Methods: Phase I cohort design. Cisplatin was administered every 3 weeks. 5-FU and LV were administered together as a weekly 24-h infusion. Cis-RA was given orally twice daily. IFN was initially given subcutaneously at a dose of 3 million units (MU) daily. Results: A total of 31 patients were treated. The IFN dose was reduced to 3 MU three times weekly because of patient intolerance. Cytopenias prevented the administration of weekly 5-FU/LV. Single-agent cisplatin with three times weekly IFN and twice daily cis-RA was tolerable. Four partial responses were observed, in patients with adrenal cancer, bladder cancer, gastric cancer, and adenocarcinoma of unknown primary. Conclusions: The recommended phase II regimen is cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, IFN 3 MU three times weekly, and cis-RA 1 mg/kg daily. This appears to be more toxic than single-agent cisplatin, but the preliminary activity observed warrants further testing.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and combination chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting have both shown promising results.Purpose: To identify a locally and systemically active concomitant chemoradiotherapy regimen incorporating high-dose cisplatin, interferon alfa-2a (IFN), fluorouracil (5-FU), hydroxyurea (HU) and radiotherapy.Methods: Phase I cohort design establishing the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin with and without granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF). For the first six dose levels, a 4-week cycle consisted of escalating doses of cisplatin during weeks 1 and 2, IFN (week 1), and 5-FU and HU (week 2) with single daily radiation fractions of 200 cGy during days 1–5 of weeks 1–3 and no treatment in week 4. When dose-limiting neutropenia was encountered, GCSF was added during weeks 1, 3, and 4. Finally, to decrease esophagitis, the radiotherapy schedule was altered to 150 cGy twice daily during weeks 1 and 2, followed by a 2-week break (level 7).Results: Forty-nine patients with refractory chest malignancies were treated. The MTD of this regimen without GCSF was cisplatin 50 mg/m2 in weeks 1 and 2, IFN 5 million Units (MU)/m2 per day on days 1–5 in week 1, 5-FU 800 mg/m2 per day for 5 days by continuous infusion, and HU 500 mg every 12 h for 11 doses during week 2. The addition of GCSF during weeks 1, 3, and 4 allowed for escalation of cisplatin to 100 mg/m2 during weeks 1 and 2, with a decreased dose of IFN at 2.5 MU/m2 per day to avoid renal toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) included severe neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and esophagitis in 5 of 13 patients. Increased thrombocytopenia in patients receiving GCSF was not observed. During hyperfractionated radiotherapy (level 7) chemotherapy doses were as above except for a reduction of 5-FU to 600 mg/m2 per day. While severe esophagitis was reduced, grade 4 thrombocytopenia became more prevalent and was seen in 6 of 7 patients. In-field tumor responses were observed in 17 of 28 evaluated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. The median times to progression and survival were 4 and 6 months, respectively. When only patients with all known disease confined to the radiotherapy field were considered the corresponding times were 6 and 15 months, respectively. Most treatment failures occurred outside of the irradiated field.Conclusions: (1) This intensive multimodality regimen can be given with aggressive supportive care incorporating GCSF. The recommended phase II doses for a 4-week cycle are cisplatin 50 mg/m2 week 1, and 100 mg/m2 week 2, IFN 2.5 MU, HU 500 mg every 12 h×11 and 5-FU 800 mg/m2 per day with single fraction radiotherapy during weeks 1–3 and GCSF during weeks 1, 3, and 4. (2) GCSF can be safely administered and provides effective support of neutrophils when administered simultaneously with IFN, cisplatin, and chest radiotherapy. (3) There is synergistic renal toxicity when high doses of IFN and cisplatin are given together. (4) Hyperfractionated radiotherapy decreases the severity of esophagitis but increases thrombocytopenia. (5) Although highly toxic, response rates, time to progression and survival figures with this regimen are encouraging and support its investigation in the phase II setting.

Background: We designed a trial of intensive multimodality therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction to assess tumor response and operability after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to determine the impact of trimodality therapy on long-term survival. Methods: Thirty-two patients with resectable (clinical stage IIa, n=17; IIb, n=1; III, n=14) squamous cell cancer (n=15) or adenocarcinoma (n=17) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leukovorin), resection, and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (hydroxyurea, 5-fluorouracil; 50–66 Gy). Results: Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy yielded the following results: a measurable clinical response in 22 patients, stable disease in eight patients, disease progression in one patient, and death in one patient. Thirty-one patients underwent resection, with the following results: two operative deaths (6.5%) and nonfatal morbidity in 17 (59%); the median hospital stay was 13 days. Pathologic staging was stage 0, n=1; I, n=2; IIa, n=11; IIb, n=5; III, n=7; and IV, n=5. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy was completed in 23 patients with one death, for an overall treatment-related mortality rate of 12.5% (four of 32). At a mean follow-up of 22.5 months, median survival is 19.7 months and 14 patients are alive and disease free. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy for cancer of the esophagus and cardia results in good tumor response. Esophagectomy in this setting can be accomplished with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Results of an interim analysis of survival are encouraging and suggest that further investigation of this regimen is warranted.

Preclinical models suggested that activating mutations of the PIK3CA gene are associated with sensitivity to inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). In breast cancers, PIK3CA mutations are associated with estrogen receptor (ER) positivity. We therefore performed an open-label single arm phase II study of the rapamycin analog, temsirolimus, at a dose of 25 mg weekly, in women with pretreated breast cancers that were positive for ER, PR, or HER2. Archived formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor was collected for immunohistochemical evaluation of components of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and PIK3CA mutation analysis. Thirty-one patients were enrolled. There were no major objective responses; however, three patients had stable disease for over 24 weeks. Twenty-three tumor samples were available for mutational analysis. There were five tumors with PIK3CA mutations; no association was found between prolonged stable disease and PIK3CA mutation or any immunohistochemical marker. There was a trend toward improved progression free survival (PFS) for patients with positive nuclear staining for phospho-Akt308. One patient remains on study four and a half years after starting therapy; her tumor did not have a PIK3CA mutation. We conclude that single agent temsirolimus has minimal activity in a population of women with heavily pretreated breast cancer. We found no evidence that either absence of immunohistochemical staining for PTEN or mutations in the hotspot domains of PIK3CA in the primary tumor were associated with clinical benefit.

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients with metastatic cancer in limited organs may benefit from metastasis-directed therapy. The authors investigated whether patients with limited metastases could be safely treated with metastasis-directed radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients with 1 to 5 metastatic cancer sites with a life expectancy of >3 months received escalating stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) doses to all known cancer sites. Patients were followed radiographically with CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis and metabolically with fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, 1 month after treatment, and then every 3 months. Acute toxicities were scored using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0, and late toxicities were scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late toxicity scoring system. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with 113 metastases were enrolled from November 2004 to November 2009 on a prospective radiation dose escalation study. Median follow-up was 20.9 months. Patients tolerated treatment well; the maximal tolerated dose was not reached in any cohort. Eleven patients (18.3%) have not progressed. One and 2-year progression-free survival are 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.8-46.1) and 22.0% (95% CI, 12.8-34.4); 1-year and 2-year overall survival are 81.5% (95% CI, 71.1-91.1) and 56.7% (95% CI, 43.9-68.9). Seventy-two percent of patients whose tumors progressed did so in limited (1-3) metastatic sites. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with 1 to 5 metastases can be safely treated to multiple body sites and may benefit from SBRT. Further investigation should focus on patient selection. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.

In this phase I study, we added escalating doses of interferon-alpha 2A (IFN) to cisplatin and twice-daily radiotherapy based on the following rationale. Radiation enhancement has been shown for both interferon and cisplatin; in addition, potentiation of the cytotoxic activity of cisplatin by interferon has been demonstrated. A total of 48 patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with radiotherapy in 2 daily fractions of 125 cGy plus cisplatin at 8-10 mg/m2 per day delivered on 3 different schedules (continuous infusion, daily short-term infusion, and single short-term infusion of 50 mg/m2). IFN was injected s.c. 2 h preceding the first daily fraction of radiation. IFN doses ranged from 0 to 5.0 x 10(6) U/m2 per day. All therapy was given over 5 days of every other week until completion of the radiotherapy. Treatment at all dose levels was well tolerated during cycles 1 and 2, with no instance of acute grade 3 or 4 toxicity being noted. However, cumulative myelosuppression in patients receiving more than two treatment cycles was seen at all dose levels and was attributed to the repeated administration of cisplatin. Alteration of the cisplatin schedule did not allow for further dose escalation of cisplatin. Our recommended doses are cisplatin given at 8 mg/m2 per day as a continuous infusion with IFN at 5.0 x 10(6) U/m2 per day. Among 24 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, 2 had a complete response, 9 had a partial response, and 7 had stable disease. We conclude that this concomitant cisplatin-IFN-radiotherapy regimen is feasible. Activity was seen in non-small-cell lung cancer, and further studies of this regimen in that disease appear indicated.

Forty-nine consecutive patients with pathologic Stage II non-small-cell lung cancer treated over a 15-year period were retrospectively reviewed. The treatment strategy evolved during the period of review. Early patients were treated with surgery alone (S); subsequent patients were treated with adjuvant radiation therapy (SR); and more recent patients were treated with postoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy (SRC). Fifteen patients received S alone, 10 patients received SR, and 24 patients received SRC. The median survival time (MST) of all 49 patients was 20 months, and the estimated 5-year survival was 25%. The MST of patients in each of the three treatment arms was S-6 months; SR-19 months; and SRC-25 months. The majority of patients died from systemic relapses or second primary lung cancers. The addition of adjuvant therapy (SR, SRC) significantly improved the MST of patients compared to surgery alone (S). The overall survival of patients did not change between treatment arms.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods The treatment regimen was given as defined in a phase I investigation in patients with previously treated ovarian cancer. It consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (1-h infusion) and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 (2-h infusion) given every 21 days. Eligible patients had stage IIIB (pleural effusion)/IV NSCLC, measurable disease, no prior chemotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2, and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function. Results A total of 38 patients were enrolled with the following characteristics: 29% male (n = 11); 71% female (n = 27); median age 64.5 years (range 37–78); performance status of 0–1 84% (n = 32); stage IIIB 8% (n = 3); stage IV 92% (n = 35). One hundred and eighty-one cycles were administered, with a median of four per patient (range one to 12). The overall objective response rate for all 38 patients was 34.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.6% to 51.4%]. This response rate includes 13 patients who met criteria for a partial response. No complete responses were observed. Median overall survival time was 9.2 months (95% CI 6–12.4) and median progression-free survival time was 4.3 months (95% CI 2.1–6.5). The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 37% and 21%, respectively. Hematological toxicity included six patients with grade 4 neutropenia. Non-hematological toxicity consisted mainly of grades 1 and 2 neurosensory toxicity. Laryngodysesthesia was observed in two patients following oxaliplatin infusion. No grade 4 non-hematological toxicities were encountered. Conclusion This regimen is well tolerated, and demonstrates activity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is an autoimmune disorder. The pathogenesis is believed to be mediated by an autoantibody directed against the metalloproteinase responsible for the degradation of the very-high-molecular-weight multimers of the vWF. The syndrome can be precipitated by a variety of conditions, and certain medications also have been implicated.The cases of two patients who took a cephalosporin antibiotic, cephalexin (Keflex, Eli Lilly), and then developed TTP are reported. One patient subsequently received a third-generation cephalosporin, ceftriaxone (Rocephin, Roche), without adverse reaction. Of interest, one patient had taken cefaclor (Ceclor, Eli Lilly) 8 years before and had also developed TTP at that time. The other patient also took cefaclor for approximately 3 weeks before taking cephalexin. In addition, she had had a dose of clarithromycin (Biaxin, Abbott Laboratories) the day before the onset of the TTP symptoms.To our knowledge, TTP has not been reported previously after administration of cephalosporin antibiotics. Attention is called to the possibility that this syndrome may occur after exposure to some of these drugs, although the incidence is very rare or, alternatively, underdiagnosed.

This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin when administered in combination with a fixed dose of vinorelbine and concomitant radiation therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chemotherapy was administered on days 1 and 8 of two 21 day cycles. It consisted of vinorelbine at 15 mg/m(2) and carboplatin administered at an initial area under the curve (AUC) of 1.5, and increased by an AUC of 0.5 per dose level to a maximum AUC of 3, corresponding with an AUC of 6 per cycle of chemotherapy. Radiation was administered in daily fractions of 200 cGy over 5-7 weeks. We treated 36 patients, of whom 27 had stage II or III disease, and nine had stage IV disease but required thoracic radiation for palliation. Toxicities included neutropenia (three with Grade 4) and esophagitis (seven with Grade 3 and one with Grade 4). Four patients had radiation pneumonitis 4-7 months after completing therapy, three of whom died. The recommended phase II dose of carboplatin is an AUC of 3 on 2 consecutive weeks. Of 33 patients evaluable for response within the radiation field, 17 (52%) had complete or partial response, and 13 had stable disease. Of seven patients evaluable with distant metastatic disease, three had a complete or partial response, and two had stable disease. The median survival for the entire group and for patients with stage II/III disease was 13.5 months. We conclude that the combination of carboplatin, vinorelbine, and radiotherapy is feasible at these doses. It may be a useful alternative for patients not able to tolerate cisplatin-based therapy.

Lung cancer remains a major worldwide health problem, accounting for more than a sixth of cancer deaths. The proportion of cancers that are adenocarcinomas is increasing in North America and to some degree in Europe, leading to a changing clinical picture characterised by early development of metastases. Newer diagnostic techniques have allowed for more accurate tumour staging and treatment planning. In patients with non-small-cell cancer, surgical resection offers substantial cure rates in early-stage cases. Combined chemotherapy plus radiation therapy has clearly improved the treatment results for patients with locally advanced cancers, and patients with metastatic disease are now candidates for newer chemotherapy regimens with more favourable results than in the past. Small-cell lung cancer is highly responsive to chemotherapy, and recent advances in radiation therapy have improved the prospects for long survival. New techniques for screening, and innovative approaches to both local and systemic treatment offer hope for substantial progress against this disease in the near future.

Background . The increasing incidence of lung cancer among women prompted us to assess whether sex-associated differences exist in the presentation and survival of patients who undergo major lung resection for lung cancer. Methods . We performed a retrospective review of patients who had major lung resection for lung cancer from January 1980 to June 1998. Results . There were 265 men and 186 women. Women were younger (60.7 ± 0.8 versus 63.6 ± 0.6 years; p = 0.005). Adenocarcinoma was more common among women (48% versus 40%; p = 0.001). Pathologic stages for men were: I=43%, II=26%, IIIA=25%, IIIB or IV=6%, and for women: I=52%, II=20%, IIIA=22%, IIIB or IV=6% ( p = 0.146). Median survival was better for women (41.8 versus 26.9 months; p = 0.006). This was due both to a difference in stage at presentation and to a better median survival rate for adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell cancer. The data suggest an association between sex and survival, although this failed to reach statistical significance. Sex influenced survival with a relative risk for women of 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.35 to 1.29; p = 0.231 adjusted for stage, cell type, age, and spirometry). Conclusions . There are sex-associated differences in the presentation and possibly in the survival of patients with lung cancer. This finding has possible implications regarding the selection of patients for therapy and for the design of randomized therapeutic trials.

Background Second- and third-generation cephalosporins have been associated with immune-mediated hemolytic reactions. This report discusses two patients who developed clinically significant extravascular hemolysis while receiving the third-generation cephalosporin ceftizoxime (Ceftizox). This is believed to be the first time hemolysis has been described in patients receiving this drug. Study design and methods Immunologic workup of drug-dependent antibodies was performed on blood samples using drug-coated and immune complex methodologies. Antibody classes and titers were analyzed. Results Both the patients' sera contained anti-ceftizoxime that reacted with red cells only when ceftizoxime was added to the sera ("immune complex" method). The patients recovered without complications following discontinuation of the drug. Each patient had IgM and IgG drug-dependent antibodies. The drug-induced antibodies from each patient cross-reacted with cefotaxime, which is structurally similar to ceftizoxime, but cross-reacted either weakly or not at all with ceftriaxone, which has a more complex side chain. Conclusion This report describes the first cases of immune hemolytic anemia associated with ceftizoxime. In drug-induced hemolytic reactions, prompt recognition and discontinuation of the drug may be important factors in reducing the chance of serious sequelae.

Summary Purpose: To define the activity and toxicity of preoperative chemotherapy and postoperative concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus, and to determine the effect on survival in patients treated with this approach. Patients and methods: Patients were treated with two 21-day cycles of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 on day 1, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m 2 /day continuous infusion on days 1-5, and leucovorin 100 mg/m 2 every four hours on days 1-5. Surgical resection was performed if feasible (and could also be performed prior to chemotherapy). Patients then received radiotherapy (50 to 60 Gy) every other week x five to six weeks, concomitantly with 5-FU 800 mg/m 2 continuous infusion daily and hydroxyurea 1 g twice daily x five days. Results: Forty-six patients were treated. With a minimum follow-up of 58 months, the median survival for the entire group was 16 months; the median survivals for patients with squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma were 29 months and 12 months, respectively. Toxicities of induction chemotherapy were severe neutropenia and mucositis; there was one toxic death. Toxicities of concomitant chemoradiotherapy were neutropenia, mucositis and esophagitis. There were five cases of radiation pneumonitis, one fatal. Conclusion: Induction chemotherapy and postoperative concomitant chemoradiotherapy can be added to surgical resection for carcinoma of the esophagus. Combined modality therapy, as reported here, produces long-term survival benefit, particularly in patients with squamous carcinoma. However, similar outcome results have been reported with less toxic and shorter treatment regimens as tested in randomized studies.

PURPOSE This multicenter phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of a combination of paclitaxel and topotecan in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Plasma levels of paclitaxel and topotecan were obtained during cycle 1 to correlate pharmacokinetic parameters with toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Paclitaxel was administered intravenously (i.v.) at 230 mg/m2 over 3 hours on day 1 followed by topotecan 1.0 mg/m2 i.v. over 30 minutes on days 1 to 5. Patients received an abbreviated premedication regimen that consisted of ranitidine 50 mg, diphenhydramine 50 mg, and a single 20-mg dose of dexamethasone, all administered i.v. 30 minutes before paclitaxel. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) was administered at 5 micrograms/kg/d subcutaneously starting on day 6 and continuing until the absolute granulocyte count (AGC) was greater than 10,000/microL. Plasma paclitaxel and topotecan concentrations were assessed during the first cycle using limited-sampling strategies. RESULTS Seventeen patients were treated. The majority had visceral metastases. Four patients experienced neutropenic fever and one had mild bronchospasm. Only one partial response (PR) was observed. Nadir AGC correlated strongly with both duration of paclitaxel levels greater than 0.05 mumol/L and maximum concentration (Cmax) of paclitaxel. CONCLUSION This regimen does not produce a response rate superior to that expected with single-agent paclitaxel at doses that do not require growth factor support.

BACKGROUND Adozelesin, a synthetic analogue of the antitumor antibiotic CC-1065, is the first of a class of potent sequence-specific alkylating agents to be brought to clinical trial. In preclinical in vitro testing, it has demonstrated antitumor activity at picomolar concentrations. PURPOSE We conducted a phase I study of adozelesin to (a) determine a recommended dose for phase II testing using a 24-hour intravenous infusion, (b) characterize the toxic effects of the drug using this schedule, and (c) document any antitumor activity observed. METHODS Adozelesin was given as a 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion. Treatments were initially scheduled every 3 weeks, but the prolonged myelosuppression observed necessitated a final dosing interval of every 6 weeks. The starting dose of 30 micrograms/m2 was escalated using a modified Fibonacci scheme until dose-limiting toxicity was encountered. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients were entered in the study. Successive dose levels used were 30, 60, 100, 150, 120, and 100 micrograms/m2. Prolonged thrombocytopenia and granulocytopenia were dose limiting. No antitumor responses were observed. CONCLUSION We recommend that the phase II dose of adozelesin given as a continuous 24-hour intravenous infusion be 100 micrograms/m2, repeated every 6 weeks. Other potentially less myelosuppressive schedules could be pursued.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy represents an investigational approach to the treatment of locoregionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The theoretical rationale, and clinical experience are reviewed in brief. Clinical trials conducted at the University of Chicago are summarized.

Increasing evidence supports the investigation of chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Randomized studies in patients with stage IV disease have shown increased survival in chemotherapy-treated patients compared to best supportive care and indicate the ability of chemotherapy to alter the natural history of this disease. Randomized studies involving adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy have also shown encouraging results. These studies and results of recent pilot studies utilizing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy indicate a potential benefit from the use of chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC and call for its continued intensive investigation in clinical trials.

A review of atypical mycobacterial infections complicating cardiac operations is presented. Proven sources of infections at different institutions include contaminated porcine valves and municipal water supply, but the mode of transmission in the great majority of patients remains unclear. There are two principal clinical forms of atypical mycobacterial infections after cardiac operations—endocarditis and sternal osteomyelitis. The latter has characteristics resembling tuberculotic "cold abscess." Specialized laboratory testing is necessary to confirm the diagnosis, and surgeons may have to take the initiative to request special microbiological investigation in cases where infection is clinically suspected but routine cultures are reported as "negative." The prognosis for patients who have any atypical mycobacterial infection after a heart operation is severe. Those infected with the strain chelonei and those whose cardiac chambers were entered during operation fare worse. This dim clinical prognosis may be improved by appropriate and aggressive antibiotic and surgical therapy. Awareness of the urgency of special bacteriological studies is the key to successful management.

The records were reviewed of 111 consecutive patients who had lung cancer resected and who were followed with serial postoperative whole-body gallium scans. Scans were obtained preoperatively at intervals of 3-6 months for about 1 year after surgery and subsequently at yearly intervals. The period of follow-up varied from 1 1/2 to 8 years. Of 55 patients who developed tumor recurrence, a gallium scan was the first indicator of recurrence in 11 (20%) and was judged helpful in confirming or localizing a recurrence in another 14 patients (25%). False-positive rates were determined from 175 postoperative scans in the other 56 patients who did not suffer recurrence. Of these 175 scans, 15 (9%) demonstrated abnormalities that were sufficiently suspicious that an additional diagnostic procedure, other than chest radiography, was performed for clarification. However, in no case did the gallium scan result adversely affect the management of the patient. Our data demonstrate that routine postoperative whole-body gallium scanning can facilitate early detection of recurrence in some cases. Judicious use of gallium scanning in cases with clinically suspected recurrence can enable prompt localization, diagnosis, and treatment of recurrent tumor.

Adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung is a rare and poorly described entity. At the University of Chicago between 1974 and 1985, 2.3% (20/873) of patients with lung cancer had well-differentiated adenosquamous carcinoma. As in non-small cell lung cancer, patients with Stage I disease were amenable to operation with 60% (3/5) free from disease between one and six years postoperatively. However, Stage II adenosquamous carcinoma (14 patients) exhibited highly aggressive behavior with rapid progression of disease (mean interval, 2.1 months). Despite combinations of surgery (6 patients), chemotherapy (6 patients, one response), and radiotherapy (10 patients, no response), median survival for patients with Stage III adenosquamous carcinoma was 5.0 months, worse than that for Stage III small cell cancer (9.6 months), adenocarcinoma (9.0 months), and squamous cancer (7.8 months).

IntroductionWe investigated dose-dense docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with measurable non-small cell lung cancer in a randomized phase II study without [A] or with [B] a putative chemoprotective agent, BNP7787.Patients and MethodsChemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB (effusion) or IV, performance status 0 to 1, and adequate organ function were eligible. Treatment with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour day 1 with darbepoetin 200 μg day 1 and pegfilgrastim 6 mg day 2 without/with BNP7787 before cisplatin was repeated every other week for up to 6 cycles. The primary end point was to differentiate between grade ≥2 neurotoxicity rates of 30% on [A] and 10% on [B]. Feasibility was prospectively defined as febrile neutropenia in

Introduction This Phase I trial aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated-dose of erlotinib administered with two standard chemoradiotherapy regimens for non-small cell lung cancer. Methods Unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients were enrolled in this 2-arm dose-escalation study. Erlotinib, given only during chemoradiotherapy, was escalated from 50 to 150 mg/d in 3 to 6 patient cohorts. Arm A: erlotinib with cisplatin (50 mg/m 2 IV days 1, 8, 29, 36), etoposide (50 mg/m 2 IV days 1-5, 29-33) and chest radiotherapy (66 Gy, 2 Gy/d) followed by docetaxel (75 mg/m 2 IV Q21 d) for 3 cycles. Arm B: induction carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m 2 ) for two 21-d cycles then radiotherapy with erlotinib, carboplatin (AUC = 2/wk) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m 2 /wk). Results Seventeen patients were treated in each arm. Patient characteristics: performance status 0 to 24 patients, 1 to 10 patients, median age 63 years, adenocarcinoma 21% and female 14 patients. Dose-escalation of erlotinib to 150 mg/d was possible on both chemoradiotherapy regimens. Grade 3/4 leukopenia and neutropenia were predominant toxicities in both arms. Grade 3 chemoradiotherapy toxicities in arm A were esophagitis (3 patients), vomiting (1), ototoxicity (1), diarrhea (2), dehydration (3), pneumonitis (1); and arm B was esophagitis (6). Seven patients (21%) developed rash (all grade 1/2). Median survival times for patients on Arm A and B were 10.2 and 13.7 months, respectively. Three-year overall survival in patients with and without rash were 53% and 10%, respectively (log-rank P = 0.0807). Epidermal growth factor receptor IHC or FISH positive patients showed no significant overall survival difference. Conclusion Addition of standard-dose erlotinib to chemoradiotherapy is feasible without evident increase in toxicities. However, the survival data are disappointing in this unselected patient population and does not support further investigation of this approach.

Introduction Eribulin mesylate (E7389) is an analog of halichondrin B with a unique mechanism of microtubule binding. The activity and toxicity of eribulin were assessed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with a taxane. Methods An open-label phase II study included patients with NSCLC previously treated with platinum and taxane-based therapy, with up to two prior cytotoxic regimens, given for metastatic disease or as adjuvant therapy. Patients were stratified by taxane-sensitivity: taxane-sensitive (TS, progression >90 days after taxane) or taxane-resistant (TR, progression ⩽90 days after taxane). Patients received an intravenous infusion of eribulin at 1.4 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. The primary end point was objective response rate and secondary end points included progression-free survival and overall survival. Results Sixty-six patients were accrued. The objective response rate was 5% with a median duration of response of 7.8 months. In the TS arm, 3 of 45 patients (7%) achieved a partial response and another 11 of 45 (24%) achieved stable disease for at least 3 months, whereas in the TR arm, no patients achieved a partial response and 4 of 21 (19%) achieved stable disease for at least 3 months. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months in the TS subgroup and 1.2 months in the TR subgroup. The median overall survival was 12.6 months in the TS subgroup and 8.9 months in the TR subgroup. Toxicities were primarily hematologic; only two patients developed grade 3 neuropathy. Conclusions Eribulin mesylate is well tolerated and demonstrates activity in pretreated, TS NSCLC.

Background This study was performed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of temozolomide and irinotecan as a second-line regimen in recurrent/metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Patients with recurrent/metastatic NSCLC, including those with treated brain metastases, following one prior platinum-based regimen received temozolomide 75 mg/m2 daily on days 1 through 15 and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 on days 8 and 15 every 21 days. Results The authors treated 46 patients, of whom more that 90% had a performance status of 0 or 1. Four patients (8.7%) attained partial response and 17 (37.0%) had disease stabilization as their best response. The median time to progression was 1.8 months, median overall survival was 9.8 months, and 1-year overall survival was 34%. Grade 1/2 fatigue (63%), anemia (61%), nausea (52%), and diarrhea (44%) were the most common toxicities. Grade 3/4 leukopenia and diarrhea were each observed in 9% of patients. One unexpected death occurred, possibly related to the regimen. Conclusion Second-line treatment with temozolomide and irinotecan showed tolerable toxicities. The response rates, median survival times, and 1-year survival rates were comparable to other active NSCLC agents.

Two outbreaks of postoperative wound infections due to organisms of the Mycobacterium fortuitum complex (Mycobacterium chelonei and M. fortuitum) occurred among patients who underwent open-heart surgery. In one hospital, 19 of 80 patients who underwent cardiac surgery within a 10-week period developed sternal infection with M. chelonei. In the second hospital, four of nine patients who underwent cardiac surgery within a two-week period developed sternal incisional infection with M. fortuitum. Although epidemiologic investigations uncovered factors that were significantly associated with the development of infection, the source of the infections could not be determined. The results of numerous cultures were negative, but because the investigations were conducted at least two months after many of the patients had had surgery, the materials in use at the time of the surgery were not available for culture. These results emphasize that physicians should be aware that rapidly growing mycobacteria may produce postoperative wound infections.

Nosocomial transmission of influenza has been reported infrequently; however, patients in general hospitals are often among the most susceptible to the complications of influenza infection. Hospital-acquired influenza may occur more often than is reported, but it may be recognized because of lack of diagnostic facilities or the time required for virus isolation and identification. Based on the mode of transmission in the hospital, the established reservoirs of influenza virus, and duration of virus shedding, isolating patients with influenza may occasionally be useful but restricting visitors is probably not required. Vaccinating hospital personnel with influenza vaccine and, if influenza A is prevalent, giving amantadine hydrochloride to high-risk patients or personnel should both be considered.