Search

Background Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI is the most sensitive method for detection of breast cancer. However, due to high costs and retention of intravenously injected gadolinium-based contrast agent, screening with DCE-MRI is only recommended for patients who are at high risk for developing breast cancer. Thus, a noncontrast-enhanced alternative to DCE is desirable. Purpose To investigate whether velocity selective arterial spin labeling (VS-ASL) can be used to identify increased perfusion and vascularity within breast lesions compared to surrounding tissue. Study type Prospective. Population Eight breast cancer patients. Field strength/sequence A 3 T; VS-ASL with multislice single-shot gradient-echo echo-planar-imaging readout. Assessment VS-ASL scans were independently assessed by three radiologists, with 3-25 years of experience in breast radiology. Scans were scored on lesion visibility and artifacts, based on a 3-point Likert scale. A score of 1 corresponded to "lesions being distinguishable from background" (lesion visibility), and "no or few artifacts visible, artifacts can be distinguished from blood signal" (artifact score). A distinction was made between mass and nonmass lesions (based on BI-RADS lexicon), as assessed in the standard clinical exam. Statistical tests Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for interobserver agreement. Results The ICC was 0.77 for lesion visibility and 0.84 for the artifact score. Overall, mass lesions had a mean score of 1.27 on lesion visibility and 1.53 on the artifact score. Nonmass lesions had a mean score of 2.11 on lesion visibility and 2.11 on the artifact score. Data conclusion We have demonstrated the technical feasibility of bilateral whole-breast perfusion imaging using VS-ASL in breast cancer patients. Evidence level 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced computed tomography (CT) attenuation values to exclude a pheochromocytoma in the diagnostic work-up of patients with an adrenal incidentaloma and to model the associated difference in diagnostic costs. Methods: The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from indexing to September 27, 2018, and studies reporting the proportion of pheochromocytomas on either side of the 10-Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold on unenhanced CT were included. The pooled proportion of pheochromocytomas with an attenuation value greater than 10 HU was determined, as were the modeled financial costs of the current and alternative diagnostic approaches. Results: Of 2957 studies identified, 31 were included (N=1167 pheochromocytomas). Overall risk of bias was low. Heterogeneity was not observed between studies (Q=11.5, P=.99, I-2=0%). The pooled proportion of patients with attenuation values greater than 10 HU was 0.990 (95% CI, 0.984-0.995). The modeled financial costs using the new diagnostic approach were (sic)55 (similar to$63) lower per patient. Conclusion: Pheochromocytomas can be reliably ruled out in the case of an adrenal lesion with an unenhanced CT attenuation value of 10 HU or less. Therefore, determination of metanephrine levels can be restricted to adrenal tumors with an unenhanced CT attenuation value greater than 10 HU. Implementing this novel diagnostic strategy is cost-saving. (C) 2019 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research

INTRODUCTION: In patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer (EC), the value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) after fluorine-18 labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET/CT) is questionable. Retrospectively, we assessed the impact of EUS after PET/CT on the given treatment in EC patients.METHODS: During the period 2009-2015, 318 EC patients were staged as T1-4aN0-3M0 with hybrid (18)F-FDG-PET/CT or (18)F-FDG-PET with CT and EUS if applicable in a nonspecific order. We determined the impact of EUS on the given treatment in 279 patients who also were staged with EUS. EUS had clinical consequences if it changed curability, extent of radiation fields or lymph node resection (AJCC stations 2-5), and when the performed fine-needle aspiration (FNA) provided conclusive information of suspicious lymph node.RESULTS: EUS had an impact in 80 (28.7%) patients; it changed the radiation field in 63 (22.6%), curability in 5 (1.8%), lymphadenectomy in 48 (17.2%), and FNA was additional in 21 (7.5%). In patients treated with nCRT (n = 194), EUS influenced treatment in 53 (27.3%) patients; in 38 (19.6%) the radiation field changed, in 3 (1.5%) the curability, in 35 (18.0%) the lymphadenectomy, and in 17 (8.8%) FNA was additional. EUS influenced both the extent of radiation field and nodal resection in 31 (16.0%) nCRT patients.CONCLUSIONS: EUS had an impact on the given treatment in approximately 29%. In most patients, the magnitude of EUS found expression in the extent of radiotherapy target volume delineation to upper/high mediastinal lymph nodes.

Background: Clinical nodal (cN) staging is a key element in treatment decisions in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). The reliability of cN status regarding the effect on response and survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with esophagectomy was evaluated in determining the up- and downstaged pathological nodal (pN) status after surgery alone. Material and methods: From a prospective database, we included all 395 EC patients who had surgery with curative intent with or without nCRT between 2000 and 2015. All patients were staged by a standard pretreatment protocol: 16-64 mdCT, 18 F-FDG-PET or 18 F-FDG-PET/CT and EUS ± FNA. After propensity score matching on baseline clinical tumor and nodal (cT/N) stage and histopathology, a surgery-alone and nCRT group (each N = 135) were formed. Clinical and pathological N stage was scored as equal (cN = pN), downstaged (cN > pN) or upstaged (cN p value Results: The surgery-alone and nCRT group did not differ in cT/N status. Pathologic examination revealed equal staging (32 vs. 27%), nodal up (43 vs. 16%) and downstaging (25 vs. 56%), respectively (p p = .002) and lymph-angioinvasion (p = .016) in surgery-alone, and upper abdominal cN metastases (p = .012) and lymph node ratio (p = .034) in the nCRT group. Conclusions: Despite modern staging methods, correct cN staging remains difficult in EC. Nodal overstaging (cN > pN) occurred more often than understaging impeding an adequate assessment of pathologic complete response and prognosis after nCRT. Preoperative assessment of true nodal response after nCRT in EC remains difficult with clinical nodal upstaging (16% vs. 43%) and downstaging (56% vs. 25%) after nCRT and surgery alone, respectively.

BackgroundA substantial proportion of all pheochromocytomas is currently detected during the evaluation of an adrenal incidentaloma. Recently, it has been suggested that biochemical testing to rule out pheochromocytoma is unnecessary in case of an adrenal incidentaloma with an unenhanced attenuation value ≤10 Hounsfield Units (HU) at computed tomography (CT).ObjectivesWe aimed to determine the sensitivity of the 10 HU threshold value to exclude a pheochromocytoma.MethodsRetrospective multicenter study with systematic reassessment of preoperative unenhanced CT scans performed in patients in whom a histopathologically proven pheochromocytoma had been diagnosed. Unenhanced attenuation values were determined independently by two experienced radiologists. Sensitivity of the 10 HU threshold was calculated, and interobserver consistency was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).Results214 patients were identified harboring a total number of 222 pheochromocytomas. Maximum tumor diameter was 51 (39–74) mm. The mean attenuation value within the region of interest was 36 ± 10 HU. Only one pheochromocytoma demonstrated an attenuation value ≤10 HU, resulting in a sensitivity of 99.6% (95% CI: 97.5–99.9). ICC was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75–0.86) with a standard error of measurement of 7.3 HU between observers.ConclusionThe likelihood of a pheochromocytoma with an unenhanced attenuation value ≤10 HU on CT is very low. The interobserver consistency in attenuation measurement is excellent. Our study supports the recommendation that in patients with an adrenal incidentaloma biochemical testing for ruling out pheochromocytoma is only indicated in adrenal tumors with an unenhanced attenuation value >10 HU.

Purpose To investigate whether multiple sclerosis (MS) atrophy can be assessed by SIENA and SIENAX software using other image types from MS research protocols than T1-weighted images without contrast agent, which are not always available. Materials and Methods We selected 46 MS patients with identical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols at two timepoints. We calculated normalized brain volume (NBV) using SIENAX, and percentage brain volume change (PBVC) using SIENA, from T1-weighted images with and without contrast agent, T2-weighted images, and (calculated) pseudo-T1-weighted images. Relative agreement of the results was assessed using variance component estimation. Results Relative agreement with T1-weighted images without contrast agent was good for T1-weighted images with contrast agent (ICC = 0.86 for NBV, ICC = 0.77 for PBVC), and reasonably good for pseudo-T1 and T2-weighted images (T2: ICC = 0.72 for NBV, 0.58 for PBVC; pseudo-T1: ICC = 0.68 for NBV, 0.83 for PBVC). Conclusion Brain atrophy can be studied using SIENA and SIENAX if T1-weighted images without contrast agent are not available. T1-weighted images with contrast agent should be used if available. Otherwise, pseudo-T1 and T2-weighted images seem acceptable and accessible alternatives. The use of these other images will greatly improve research possibilities, especially regarding older datasets. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:559–565. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.