Search

Aim: To systematically compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in children with allergic rhinitis (AR)., Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2, 2023. Outcomes included symptom scores (SSs), medication scores (MSs), symptom and medication scores (SMSs), new sensitizations, development of asthma, improvement, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The quality of the included studies was assessed by the modified Jadad scale and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Meta-regression was carried out to explore the source of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was further conducted in terms of study design [randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies], allergen [house dust mites (HDMs), grass pollen], treatment duration (≥ 24, 12-23 or < 12 months), allergen immunotherapy (AIT) modality (drops or tablets), and AIT protocol [continuous, pre-seasonal, co-seasonal, or after the grass pollen season (GPS)]. Sensitivity analysis was conducted for all outcomes. A Bayesian framework and a Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) model were developed for indirect comparison., Results: Totally 50 studies with 10813 AR children were included, with 4122 treated with SLIT, 1852 treated with SCIT, and 4839 treated with non-SLIT or non-SCIT therapy. For direct comparison, the SLIT group had a similar SS to the SCIT group [pooled standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.46, 1.28, P = 0.353]. Comparable MSs were observed in the SLIT and SCIT groups (pooled SMD: 0.82, 95%CI: -0.88, 2.53, P = 0.344). For indirect comparison, no significant differences were found in SSs (pooled SMD: 1.20, 95% credibility interval (CrI): -1.70, 4.10), MSs (pooled SMD: 0.57, 95%CrI: -1.20, 2.30), SMSs (pooled SMD: 1.80, 95%CrI: -0.005, 3.60), new sensitizations [pooled relative risk (RR): 0.34, 95%CrI: 0.03, 3.58], and development of asthma (pooled RR: 0.68, 95%CrI: 0.01, 26.33) between the SLIT and SCIT groups; the SLIT group illustrated a significantly lower incidence of TRAEs than the SCIT group (pooled RR: 0.17, 95%CrI: 0.11, 0.26)., Conclusion: Considering both efficacy and safety, SLIT might be a more favorable AIT than SCIT in the treatment of pediatric AR, which may serve as a decision-making reference for clinicians., Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023460693)., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Yang and Lei.)

Background: As part of the planning for a future multicenter study, this preliminary clinical trial used serum samples from patients to identify biomarkers for predicting the therapeutic effects of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for Japanese cedar pollinosis (JCP)., Methods: This prospective study included patients undergoing SLIT for JCP at our hospital. All enrolled patients (N = 17) started SLIT between June and November of 2015. With informed consent from the patients, blood samples were obtained in January, March, and June of 2016, and patients completed the Japan rhino-conjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (JRQLQ). On the basis of the JRQLQ results, the 6 patients with the best outcomes were included in the high-response group (HRG), and the 5 patients with the worst outcomes were included in the poor-response group (PRG). We then compared serum data between the two groups, to identify useful biomarkers., Results: IL-12p70 and VEGF levels tended to be higher in the HRG than in the PRG in January, March, and June (0.10 > p > 0.05). In addition, the June IL-17 level was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the HRG than in the PRG., Conclusions: IL-12p70 and VEGF may be useful biomarkers for predicting the effects of SLIT. In addition, although IL-17 does not appear to be useful as a biomarker for evaluating treatment response at the start of SLIT, it may be useful as a biomarker after the beginning phase of SLIT.

Background: In Mexico, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and immunotherapy with hymenoptera venom (VIT) is traditionally practiced combining aspects of the European and American school. In addition, both types of extracts (European and American) are commercially available in Mexico. Moreover, for an adequate AIT/VIT a timely diagnosis is crucial. Therefore, there is a need for a widely accepted, up-to-date national immunotherapy guideline that covers diagnostic issues, indications, dosage, mechanisms, adverse effects and future expectations of AIT (GUIMIT 2019)., Method: With nationwide groups of allergists participating, including delegates from postgraduate training-programs in Allergy/Immunology-forming, the guideline document was developed according to the ADAPTE methodology: the immunotherapy guidelines from European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology, The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology were selected as mother guidelines, as they received the highest AGREE-II score among international guidelines available; their evidence conforms the scientific basis for this document., Results: GUIMIT emanates strong or weak (suggestions) recommendations about practical issues directly related to in vivo or in vitro diagnosis of IgE mediated allergic diseases and the preparation and application of AIT/VIT and its adverse effects. GUIMIT finishes with a perspective on AIT modalities for the future. All the statements were discussed and voted on until > 80 % consensus was reached., Conclusions: A wide and diverse group of AIT/VIT experts issued transculturized, evidence-based recommendations and reached consensus that might improve and standardize AIT practice in Mexico.

Background and Aims: Mast cell activation interferes with the effects of allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT). Galectin-1 (Gal-1) is capable of regulating immune cells' functions. This study tests the hypothesis that administration of Gal-1 promotes and prolongs the efficacy of SIT via suppressing mast cell activation., Methods: An intestinal allergy mouse model was developed. The coadministration of SIT and Gal-1 on suppression of the allergic responses, prevention of mast cell activation, and generation of antigen-specific regulatory T cells (Treg) in the intestine was observed in sensitized mice., Results: The coadministration of Gal-1 and SIT markedly suppressed the allergic responses in the mouse intestine vs the use of either SIT alone or Gal-1 alone. The Gal-1 binds to the IgE/FcɛRI complexes on the surface of mast cells to prevent mast cell activation during SIT. Gal-1 promoted the SIT-generated allergen-specific Tregs in the intestine of sensitized mice. Coadministration of Gal-1 and SIT significantly enhanced the efficacy of immunotherapy in suppressing allergic responses in the intestine, which lasted for at least for 12 months., Conclusions: Long-term effects of specific immunotherapy on intestinal allergy can be achieved with Gal-1/SIT therapy by inhibiting mast cell activation and facilitating Treg development., (© 2017 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.)

Allergic respiratory diseases are major health problems in paediatric population due their high level of prevalence and chronicity, and to their relevance in the costs and quality of life. One of the most important risk factors for the development of airway diseases in children and adolescents is atopy. The mainstays for the treatment of these diseases are avoiding allergens, controlling symptoms, and preventing them through sustained desensitization by allergen immunotherapy (AIT). AIT is a treatment option that consists in the administration of increasing amounts of allergens to modify the biological response to them, inducing long-term tolerance even after treatment has ended. This treatment approach has shown to decrease symptoms and improve quality of life, becoming cost effective for a large number of patients. In addition, it is considered the only treatment that can influence the natural course of the disease by targeting the cause of the allergic inflammatory response. The aim of this publication is to reflect the advances of AIT in the diagnosis and treatment of allergic respiratory diseases in children and adolescents reviewing articles published since 2000, establishing evidence categories to support the strength of the recommendations based on evidence. The first part of the article covers the prerequisite issues to understand how AIT is effective, such as the correct etiologic and clinical diagnosis of allergic respiratory diseases. Following this, the article outlines the advancements in understanding the mechanisms by which AIT achieve immune tolerance to allergens. Administration routes, treatment regimens, dose and duration, efficacy, safety, and factors associated with adherence are also reviewed. Finally, the article reviews future advances in the research of AIT., (Copyright © 2016 SEICAP. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Food allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy (FA-SLIT) has emerged as a novel and successful approach for desensitizing human patients to specific food allergens. It has not been tested in dogs., Objective: To investigate the efficacy, quality of life (QoL), tolerability and safety of FA-SLIT in dogs with adverse food reactions (AFR)., Methods: Dogs with proven AFR were randomized to treatment (T group; n = 7) or placebo (P group; n = 6) to receive either FA-SLIT (based on the results of a food elimination trial) or glycerinated saline, respectively. The treatment was continued daily for 6 months with fortnightly dosage escalations. To evaluate the treatment, pruritus Visual Analog Scale (pVAS), Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI-04), QoL, faecal consistency scores, owner assessment, overall tolerability scores and blood analyses were assessed., Results: Eleven dogs completed the study, two dogs in the T group were withdrawn by the owner after FA-SLIT exacerbated clinical signs of AFR. Statistical tests showed significant protection against food challenge induced clinical signs following FA-SLIT therapy, as indicated by reduced pVAS and CADESI scores (P < 0.05). The QoL did not differ between groups. The treatment was rated as effective or quite effective by 80% of the owners, whereas placebo was rated as ineffective by all owners., Conclusions and Clinical Importance: FA-SLIT was effective, well tolerated and safe. No severe adverse events were recorded; erythema and pruritus were reported in association with only 0.7% of the dispensed doses. Larger clinical trials with more extended maintenance immunotherapy periods will be needed to provide more precise estimates of efficacy and frequency of adverse events., (© 2016 ESVD and ACVD.)

During recent years increasing research has been conducted on casual treatment options for food allergy, with focus on oral immunotherapy (OIT) for hen's egg, cow's milk and peanut allergy. Several studies could show that OIT leads to desensitization or an increase of threshold. However, severe adverse events during this treatment are not uncommon. Whether OIT leads to a sustained, 'robust' development of tolerance in patients has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Besides OIT, some studies on sublingual (SLIT) and epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) were performed, aiming to improve the safety profile. Furthermore, there are some pilot studies investigating a combined treatment of SLIT and OIT or a combined use of anti-IgE treatment or probiotic supplementation with OIT. Further placebo-controlled trials with larger sample size are needed in order to develop standardized protocols before immunotherapy may be used as a therapeutic option for food allergy outside of clinical trials.

Objective: To observe the compliance, efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy(SLIT) and sublingual immunotherapy(SCIT) in patients with allergic rhinitis(AR). Method: One hundred and fifteen patients sensitized to house dust mites were recruited in this study. The standardized extract of house dust mites was used for SLIT in 64 cases, and the standardized extract of dual house dust mites was used for SCIT in the other 51 cases. The compliance, nasal symptom scores, the medication scores, the quality of life and the adverse reaction were evaluated before and 2 years after immunotherapy. SPSS 19.0 was used for data analysis. Result: Forty patients out of 64 completed the 2 years-SLIT, and the compliance rate was 62.50%. Forty three patients out of 51 completed the 2 years-SCIT and the compliance rate was 84.31%.The compliance rate of SLIT was significantly lower than that of SCIT( P <0.05). The nasal symptom scores, the anti-allergic medication, the scores in quality of life decreased significantly after receiving SLIT or SCIT for 2 years（ P <0.05）. However, the changed values of scores between the two groups had no significant differences（ P >0.05）. There was no moderate or severe adverse reactions occurred in SLIT group but a total of 6 moderate or severe adverse reactions occurred in SCIT group. Conclusion: SLIT has same effect compared with SCIT with a lower compliance rate but a significantly higher safety., Competing Interests: The authors of this article and the planning committee members and staff have no relevant financial relationships with commercial interests to disclose., (Copyright© by the Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.)

Allergic diseases are prevalent worldwide. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a current treatment for allergy, leading to modification of the natural course of disease. Mechanisms of efficacy include Treg through release of IL-10 and TGF-β and specific IgG4 blocking antibodies. Subcutaneous and sublingual routes are popular, but uptake is limited by inconvenience and safety concerns. Inclusion criteria limit application to a small proportion of allergic patients. New forms of immunotherapy are being investigated for more efficacious, convenient and safer options with promising advances in recent years. The rationale of reducing vaccine allergenicity to increase safety while improving immunogenicity led to investigation of T-cell epitope-based peptides and recombinant allergen derivatives. Additionally, different routes of administration and adjuvants and adjunct therapies are being explored. This review discusses the current status of AIT and recent advances to improve clinical efficacy, safety and long-term immune tolerance.

Food allergy affects around 10% of the population. As the prevalence of food allergy continues to increase, disproportionately in children, new therapies for food allergy are being investigated. While there are no approved treatments for food allergy, immunotherapy facilitates significant desensitization and protection from accidental exposure. Nevertheless, current immunotherapies do not entirely nor permanently eliminate sensitivity to the food allergen. Since the rates of sustained unresponsiveness are significantly lower than desensitization, future therapies that enhance the rates of long-term tolerance in patients will catalyze progress in this field over the next 5-10 years.

Background: The practices and beliefs of the provider specialties that treat allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) with allergen immunotherapy (AIT) may vary., Methods: A telephone survey of 500 randomly selected health care practitioners in 7 specialties, conducted in 2012., Results: AIT was provided as a subcutaneous injection (SCIT) by 91% of allergist/immunologists, 54% of otolaryngologists, and 18% to 24% of other specialties. Otolaryngologists were the most frequent providers of sublingual drops of AIT (SLIT; 33%), compared to 2% to 10% of other specialties. AIT was recommended for adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis by 100% of allergist/immunologists vs 62% to 84% of the other specialties (p < 0.001). The primary reason for recommending AIT for adults (52%) or children (46%) was that other therapies did not work. Between 48% (nurse practitioners/physician assistants) and 93% (allergist/immunologists) of practitioners always or often decreased symptomatic medications over the course of AIT treatment. Most practitioners in all specialties (82-100%) thought that AIT was appropriate for patients with severe allergy symptoms. Significantly more allergist/immunologists and otolaryngologists than other specialists thought AIT was appropriate for mild allergy symptoms (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively, vs other specialties). Significantly more allergist/immunologists than other specialists thought that AIT was more effective than symptomatic medications (p < 0.001), could reduce the further development of allergies (p = 0.03), and could prevent the development of asthma., Conclusion: SCIT was more frequently provided than SLIT by all the specialties. Otolaryngologists were the most likely to offer SLIT, while very few allergist/immunologists offered SLIT. Allergist/immunologists differed from other specialties in some beliefs about the effectiveness of AIT., (© 2014 ARS-AAOA, LLC.)

Food allergies are increasing in prevalence and present an emerging epidemic for westernized countries. Strict dietary avoidance is the only approved management for food allergy, but accidental exposures regularly occur, leading to significant patient anxiety and decreased quality of life. Over the past decade, oral and sublingual immunotherapies have emerged as potential treatments for food allergy. While several small clinical trials have demonstrated that immunotherapy can desensitize food-allergic individuals, strategies for further enhancing safety and definitively establishing long-term efficacy are needed. This review presents an overview of recent oral and sublingual immunotherapy trials, and provides a glimpse into what the next generation of food immunotherapy may entail., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Since its description by noon in 1911, desensitization, or allergen specific immunotherapy (SIT), has been largely used in respiratory allergic diseases treatment. It remains the only etiologic treatment for allergic diseases. The development of the sublingual route and new forms of medication, as an alternative to subcutaneous injection, has led to large scale clinical trials. Many of them had been performed with allergen tablets, particularly in the field of pollen allergy. These studies have confirmed that SIT is efficient in reducing all respiratory allergic symptoms. Data on long-term benefits and sustained efficacy after stopping treatment have also been published. These show an impact on natural history of allergic disease, in particular, a reduction in the risk of asthma in desensitized rhinitic subjects and in the acquisition of new sensitivities. The basic mechanisms of immunotherapy are becoming better understood and allow us to envisage improvements in this therapeutic method in the future. The sublingual route appears to be safer with a better safety profile. This may lead to an extension of allergen specific immunotherapy indications in patients with respiratory allergic diseases.

Food allergy affects 3.9% of US children and is increasing in prevalence. The current standard of care involves avoidance of the triggering food and treatment for accidental ingestions. While there is no current curative treatment, there are a number of therapeutic strategies under investigation. Allergen specific therapies include oral and sublingual immunotherapy with native food protein as well as recombinant food proteins. Allergen non-specific therapies include a Chinese herbal formula (FAHF-2) and the use of anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy. Although none of these treatments are ready for clinical use, these therapeutic strategies present promising options for the future of food allergy.

Grass pollen is a very common cause of allergic rhinitis and asthma. The only treatment targeting the underlying causes of allergy is immunotherapy (IT). Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been introduced to solve the problem of systemic reactions to subcutaneous IT (SCIT). This article evaluates the characteristics of the allergen extract, Staloral, in terms of practical administration, effectiveness, safety, and mechanism of action. Efficacy data were obtained from double-blind, placebo-controlled studies using Staloral in patients sensitized to grass pollen, while practical administration, cost-effectiveness, and mechanism of action data were provided by well designed studies. The efficacy and safety of Staloral, as demonstrated by review of published studies which used doses up to 1125 times those administered with SCIT, shows that this allergen extract has optimal characteristics for treating patients with seasonal allergies due to grass pollens. The main mechanism of action is the interaction between dendritic cells of the oral mucosa and the subsequent tolerance induced in T-cells.

Sublingual immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid, given according to the standard schedule, was reported to be effective and safe in many clinical trials. However, a long period of time may elapse before achievement of a clinical benefit. This study was thus performed using two different shortened (4-day) induction (= up-dosing) schedules, which allowed a rapid achievement of the maintenance dosage. Overall, 86 patients suffering from rhinitis and oculorhinitis have been recruited, none of whom had received immunotherapy before. The study design was prospective, randomized, with three parallel groups receiving, according to a randomization list, one of the three induction (two up-dosing one no-up-dosing) phase schedules under study. A fourth group of patients served as controls, and did not receive any sublingual immunotherapy but only rescue medications if and when necessary. All patients were evaluated to assess their baseline conditions, and thereafter at 3 and 6 months. The evaluation parameters were: Visual Analogue Scale, symptom-medication scores, nasal provocation test. All three induction schedules under study were well accepted by the patients, with very few adverse reactions. The clinical efficacy, evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale (p < 0.001), symptom-medication scores (p < 0.02) and nasal provocation tests (p < 0.01), was found to be significant in all three sublingual immunotherapy-treated groups of 64 (n86) patients, but was not significant in controls 22 (n86). According to the Authors, with this simplified schedule process, sublingual immunotherapy is a therapeutic option that is becoming increasingly well-accepted not only by allergy specialists but also by patients.

Food allergies are caused by immune responses to food proteins and represent a breakdown of oral tolerance. They can range from mild pruritus to life-threatening anaphylaxis. The only current consensus for treatment is food avoidance, which is fraught with compliance issues. For this reason, there has been recent interest in immunotherapy, which may induce desensitization and possibly even tolerance. Through these effects, immunotherapy may decrease the potential for adverse serious reactions with accidental ingestions while potentially leading to an overall health benefit. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of food allergy and give an overview of the various immunotherapeutic options and current supporting evidence, as well as look towards the future of potential novel therapeutic modalities.

Objective: Asthma is a common chronic condition in children globally. Allergen-specific immunotherapy, such as subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual (SLIT) therapies, are promising by increasing allergen tolerance. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of SLIT and SCIT in pediatric asthma. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase for randomized controlled trials and case–control studies comparing SLIT and SCIT in asthmatic children. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models with calculations via R software version 4.3.2 and RevMan version 5.4. Study quality and bias risk were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Results: The literature search yielded a total of 1787 records, with 7 studies meeting the inclusion criteria after screening and assessments. There was no significant difference in the Total Asthma Symptoms Score between SLIT and SCIT (mean difference −0.05 [95% CI: −0.21; 0.10]). However, asthma improvement rates were higher in the SLIT group (risk ratio 0.77 [95% CI: 0.64; 0.93]). FEV1 improvement showed no significant difference (mean difference −1.60 [95% CI: −6.27; 3.08]). Adverse events were similar between the treatments (risk ratio 0.56 [95% CI: 0.11; 2.82]). Conclusions: SLIT and SCIT were generally similarly effective and safe for treating pediatric asthma. SLIT may be preferred due to its noninvasive administration. More research is needed on long-term effects and tailored treatment approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the past decades, food allergies became increasingly dominant since early childhood, leading to a lower quality of life and to increasing costs addressed by the health care system. Beside standard avoidance of specific allergens and drug treatments following allergen exposure, a great deal of research has lately focused on Food Allergy Allergen Immunotherapy (FA‐AIT). SCIT and EPIT (Subcutaneous and Epicutaneous Immunotherapy), OIT (Oral Immunotherapy), and SLIT (Sublingual Immunotherapy) consist in gradual exposure to allergens to desensitize and achieve tolerance once therapy has ended. Although promising, FA‐AIT may bring acute local and systemic adverse reactions. To enhance efficacy, safety and convenience of AIT, the quest of potential adjuvants to mitigate the adverse reactions becomes crucial. Immunomodulatory activities, such as that of increasing the regulatory T cells and decreasing the IgE, have been observed in specific probiotics' strains and multiple studies elucidated the role of gut microbiota as a major interplayer among the host and its immune system. In this review, the microbiome modulation is shown as potential AIT adjuvant, nevertheless the need of more clinical studies in the near future is pivotal to assess the efficacy of targeted bacterial therapies and faecal microbiota transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: One of the most effective treatments for allergic respiratory diseases is allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). While, mannose targeting has been applied in various immunostimulatory approaches, but it has not been investigated in sublingual allergen-specific immunosuppressive treatment. This study assesses mannose targeting for the ovalbumin (Ova) loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles(NPs). Methods: The emulsion-solvent evaporation method was employed for the synthesis of PLGA NPs containing Ova, and subsequently they attached to D-mannose. Ova-sensitized mice underwent treatment in different ways: subcutaneous administration of 10 µg Ova, sublingual administration of 5 and 10 µg Ova loaded in PLGA NPs, 5 and 10 µg Ova loaded in mannose-targeted PLGA NPs, 10 µg Ova, and 10 µg Ova loaded in dendritic cell-specific aptamer-attached PLGA NPs. Serum Ova-specific IgE and IgG2a levels, as well as IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-17a levels in the supernatant of Ova-stimulated splenocytes were measured. Splenocyte proliferation was assessed using an MTT assay, and also lung histological examinations, and nasal lavage fluid cell counting were performed. Results: Ova-specific IgE, IL-4, IL-17a levels, eosinophil cell count, and splenocyte proliferation were remarkably reduced in the mice treated with mannose or aptamer targeted NPs compared to other groups. Also, IL-10 and IFN-γ levels were remarkably increased in the targeted NPs groups. Conclusion: Our findings indicated that mannose targeting of PLGA NPs could decrease allergen dose and improve immunomodulatory effects of SLIT. However, this approach suggests an effective formulation for SLIT in the mice model, further studies with common allergens are needed for application in humans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Allergic conjunctivitis is the most common type of allergic eye disease, and the incidence in children and adolescents is increasing year by year. Drug therapy can only relieve some symptoms and only in a short period, while allergen immunotherapy is currently a therapy that can significantly improve the symptoms of chronic allergy and the course of the disease. This method has been used abroad for many years but has yet to be reported in China. The author reviews the effective mechanism and clinical efficiency of allergen immunotherapy and provides a reference for the further clinical application in China.

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has received considerable attention as a method for allergen immunotherapy (AIT). However, the mechanism of SLIT, especially its timing, has not been thoroughly investigated. We evaluated therapeutic and prophylactic SLIT in an allergic airway inflammation model and evaluated their efficacies. Mice were intranasally exposed to Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f) extract and received SLIT before (prophylactic model) and after (therapeutic model) intranasal exposure of Der f. We investigated airway responsiveness, airway inflammation, allergen-specific antibodies, lung histology and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and T-cell receptor sequencing were also investigated. SLIT in the therapeutic model was effective; however, the effects of SLIT in the prophylactic model were stronger and immune tolerance was maintained for three months. ScRNA-seq of lung CD4+CD25+ T cells revealed that the expansion of induced T regulatory (iTreg) cells was greater in the prophylactic model than that in the therapeutic model. Additionally, the TCR repertoire of iTregs from the prophylactic model was abundant, sharing many clones with the TCR repertoire of effector T cells. These data suggest that the prophylactic model of AIT is extremely effective and persistent, and may respond to allergen diversity, and provide evidence for the clinical recommendation of preventive AIT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are commonly used for allergic rhinitis (AR), yet limited research has directly compared their effects on quality of life (QoL). We aimed to assess QoL differences between SLIT and SCIT recipients. As both forms of immunotherapy have reported benefits, we hypothesize that patients undergoing SLIT and SCIT will have comparable QoL improvements. Methods: A cohort study included patients with AR treated with immunotherapy from 2018 to 2022. Patients with obstructive sleep apnea, primary ciliary dyskinesia, cystic fibrosis, vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis, or lupus were excluded. QoL was evaluated using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) at multiple time points. Demographics, additional therapies, and allergen sensitivities were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics. Results: A total of 41 participants were eligible for inclusion. Both SLIT and SCIT groups exhibited reductions from baseline RQLQ scores. Within SLIT recipients, 5/7 RQLQ domains significantly improved. SCIT recipients showed significant QoL enhancement in 3/7 domains. The mean difference between SLIT and SCIT cohorts was −0.18 (p = 0.57, d = −0.18, 95% CI [−0.79, 0.43] at a mean treatment time of 18 months. Conclusions: SLIT and SCIT showed comparable RQLQ score reductions after 18 months of therapy, suggesting similar QoL benefits between the two treatment paradigms. Further investigation is needed to explore SLIT vs. SCIT differences in long-term QoL improvements beyond two years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse effects of specific immunotherapy (SIT) in the management of respiratory allergens, including allergic asthma, rhinitis, and related disorders, based on a review of current literature up to November 8, 2022. Methods: We conducted a search of databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing respiratory allergy-specific immunotherapy. We employed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement to select RCTs that adhered to rigorous reporting standards. Specifically, we focused on double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) trials and open studies involving both adults and children, considering factors such as dosage, inclusion criteria, allergens, and primary outcome measurements. Results: A total of 25 meta-analyses were included in this study. Among them, 14 evaluated sublingual-specific allergen immunotherapy (SLIT), 4 assessed subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT), 4 explored both sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy, and 3 investigated intralymphatic immunotherapy. The outcomes of these meta-analyses indicated a reduction in medication scores in 20 cases and a decrease in symptom scores in 23 cases. Additionally, six studies reported on changes in IgE levels, seven studies focused on IgG4, four studies examined FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s), and eight studies reported on symptom and medication scores. Furthermore, 11 studies reported on differences in adverse reactions. Conclusion: The results of our meta-analysis suggest that specific immunotherapy, while associated with some adverse effects, effectively reduces the symptoms of asthma and rhinitis. Therefore, we recommend its use in the treatment of respiratory allergies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Curcumin (CUR) has been considered a potential therapeutic agent for allergic reactions due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. Nanofibers have attracted increasing attention in drug delivery. The aim of this study was to investigate the combined therapeutic effects of curcumin and allergen in nanofiber-based treatments in order to increase the effectiveness of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) efficacy in a mouse model of allergic rhinitis. Nanofibers containing CUR (1.25% and 2.5%) and ovalbumin 2% (OVA) as an allergen were prepared via electrospinning and characterized. BALB/c mice were sensitized with OVA to the induced allergic rhinitis model. SLIT with free and/or nanofibers was carried out. IL-4, INF-γ, and IgE serum levels were measured using ELISA. Splenocyte proliferation was evaluated by the MTT assay. Lung and nasal histological examinations and nasal lavage fluid (NALF) cell counting were carried out. Nanofibers containing 1.25% CUR and 2% OVA were chosen as the optimal formulations. SLIT treatment with the CUR and OVA nanofiber co-administration led to a significantly decreased serum IgE. Nanofiber containing 2.5 µg of CUR/mouse combined with OVA nanofiber showed a significant decrease in IL-4 and an increase in IFN-γ compared to other groups. NALF assessment showed a significant decrease in specific cell and eosinophil counts in the treated nanofiber groups. The histopathological results of NAL in the optimal formulations were near normal, with diminished cellular infiltration and inflammation. Our findings suggest that co-sublingual administration of allergen and CUR nanofibers can be considered as potential immunomodulatory agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Food allergies can pose significant risks and profoundly impactthe quality oflife of children and their families, making them a major public health concern.Allergen avoidance has been the traditional mainstay of treatment; however, recent research has focused on various approaches to food allergen immunotherapy. This review summarizes the recent advancements in oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous immunotherapies, highlighting their respective advantages and disadvantages. The ultimate goal of food allergen immunotherapy is to maximize efficacy while minimizing risks, leading to the exploration of strategies such as lowdose immunotherapy and the use of biologics. When selecting candidates for immunotherapy among patients with food allergies, factors such as allergen characteristics, the likelihood of natural resolution, age, symptom severity, and impact on quality of life require consideration, and an individualized approach should be adopted to determine the most suitable treatment method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Polymerized allergoids conjugated with mannan represent a novel approach of allergen immunotherapy targeting dendritic cells. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal dose of mannan-allergoid conjugates derived from grass pollen (Phleum pratense and Dactylis glomerata) administered via either the subcutaneous or sublingual route. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a doubledummy design was conducted, involving 162 participants across 12 centers in Spain. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of nine different treatment groups, each receiving either placebo or active treatment at doses of 500, 1,000, 3,000, or 5,000 mTU/mL over four months. Each participant received five subcutaneous (SC) doses of 0.5 mL each, every 30 days, and a daily sublingual (SL) dose of 0.2 mL. Participants who received active treatment through SC, received placebo through SL. Participants who received active treatment through SL, received placebo SC. One Group, as control, received bot SC and SL placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the improvement in titrated nasal provocation tests (NPT) at the end of the study compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included specific antibody (IgG4, IgE) and cellular (IL-10 producing and regulatory T cell) responses. All adverse events and side reactions were recorded and assessed. Results: Post-treatment, the active groups showed improvements in NPT ranging from 33% to 53%, with the highest doses showing the greatest improvements regardless of the administration route. In comparison, the placebo group showed a 12% improvement. Significant differences over placebo were observed at doses of 3,000 mTU/mL (p=0.049 for SL, p=0.015 for SC) and 5,000 mTU/mL (p=0.011 for SL, p=0.015 for SC). A dose-dependent increase in IgG4 was observed following SC administration, and an increase in IL-10 producing cells for both routes of administration. No serious systemic or local adverse reactions were recorded, and no adrenaline was required. Conclusion: Grass pollen immunotherapy with mannan-allergoid conjugates was found to be safe and efficacious in achieving the primary outcome, whether administered via the subcutaneous or sublingual routes, at doses of 3,000 and 5,000 mTU/mL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) using dust mites in children with allergic asthma. Methods In a prospective randomized controlled study, 98 children with dust mite-induced allergic asthma were randomly divided into a control group (n=49) and an SCIT group (n=49). The control group received inhaled corticosteroid treatment, while the SCIT group additionally received a standardized three-year SCIT regimen. The two groups were compared based on peripheral blood eosinophil percentage, visual analogue score (VAS), total medication score, Asthma Control Test/Childhood Asthma Control Test scores, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and lung function before treatment, and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after treatment. Adverse reactions were recorded post-injection to evaluate the safety of SCIT. Results Compared with pre-treatment levels, the SCIT group showed a significant reduction in the percentage of peripheral blood eosinophils, VAS, total medication score, and FeNO, while lung function significantly improved, and asthma control levels were better 3 years after treatment (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the SCIT group showed more significant improvement in all evaluated indicators 3 years after treatment (P<0.05). A total of 2 744 injections were administered, resulting in 157 cases (5.72%) of local adverse reactions and 4 cases (0.15%) of systemic adverse reactions, with no severe systemic adverse events. Conclusions SCIT is an effective and safe treatment for allergic asthma in children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The symptoms of house dust mite (HDM)‐induced allergic rhinitis (AR) vary with changes in exposure related to the weather or the domestic environment. In allergen immunotherapy (AIT) studies, a certain level of AR disease activity is necessary to demonstrate treatment efficacy; the latter can be underestimated if a substantial proportion of the patient population is weakly symptomatic. Objective: To better estimate the real treatment effect of a HDM sublingual AIT (SLIT) tablet, we analysed the results of natural field studies in detail by applying a tertile approach. Methods: We used data from three randomised, controlled trials (RCT) in a total of 2585 patients with AR treated with the 300 index of reactivity (IR) HDM SLIT‐tablet or placebo. The study centres were grouped into tertiles according to the level of combined symptom and medication scores in patients in the placebo group. In each tertile, the difference between SLIT and placebo was assessed through an analysis of covariance. Results: In the three RCTs, combined scores were found to be similar in the SLIT and placebo groups in the low tertiles. The treatment effect of the 300 IR HDM tablet increased in the medium and high tertiles, with notably significant differences versus placebo in the highest tertile and greater (ranging from −21% to −39%) than in the entire study population (−13% to −20%). The positive relationship between treatment efficacy and the combined score in each tertile was independent of the RCT and the score used. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance: Application of the tertile approach to AIT studies in a field in which many variables interact strongly might provide more accurate and meaningful measurements of efficacy and benefit for patients, better reflecting their real‐life condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tree nut allergy is a lifelong and potentially life‐threatening condition. The standard of care is strictly avoiding the culprit nut and treating accidental reactions symptomatically. To evaluate potential therapeutic options for desensitizing patients with IgE‐mediated tree nut allergy, we systematically searched three bibliographic databases for studies published until January 2024. We looked for active treatments of IgE‐mediated allergy to tree nuts (walnut, hazelnut, pistachio, cashew, almond, pecan, macadamia nut, and brazil nut). We focused on allergen‐specific immunotherapy (AIT) using oral (OIT), sublingual (SLIT), epicutaneous (EPIT), or subcutaneous (SCIT) delivery, or other disease‐modifying treatments. We found 19 studies that met our criteria: 3 studies investigated sublingual immunotherapy, 5 studied oral immunotherapy to a single tree nut, and 6 used multi‐food oral immunotherapy with or without omalizumab. The remaining studies investigated the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies or IgE‐immunoadsorption in multi‐food allergic patients, including patients with tree nut allergy. The heterogeneity of the studies prevented pooling and meta‐analysis. Oral immunotherapy, single or multi‐nut, with or without omalizumab, was the most studied approach and appears effective in conferring protection from accidental exposures. Omalizumab monotherapy is the only approved alternative management for reducing allergic reactions that may occur with accidental exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore factors influencing the acceptance of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) for the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases by pediatric patients and their families. Methods: A total of 406 children (210 males and 196 females) attending the pediatric outpatient clinics and wards of the Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from June 2020 to April 2022. Those who met the criteria for the AIT treatment, were included in the survey. An online 20-item questionnaire was developed. Data on patient's general characteristics, allergic disease status, family history of allergies, general family information, parental knowledge of allergic diseases, and whether the AIT treatment was recommended by a physician, were collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to their willingness to receive AIT: a reluctant or neutral group (n = 182), and a willing group (n = 224). A univariate analysis of the willingness to undergo AIT was done to detect parameters that significantly differed between the groups, and the identified factors were used as independent variables in the multifactorial logistic regression analysis. Results: The severity of allergic disease, presence of drug allergy, occurrence of severe allergic reactions, mother's education, distance from home to the hospital, parental knowledge of allergic diseases, and whether the doctor recommended AIT were all statistically different between the groups (p < 0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that the degree of allergic rhinitis (AR), or asthma (AS), parental knowledge of allergic diseases, and doctor's recommendation of AIT were the factors that influenced the willingness of pediatric patients to receive AIT. Conclusions: The severity of AR and AS, parental knowledge of allergic diseases, and doctor's recommendation influenced the willingness of pediatric patients to receive AIT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peanut allergy (PA) poses significant clinical challenges due to its potentially life-threatening nature and increasing prevalence, particularly in children. Strict avoidance is difficult due to the widespread presence of peanuts in various foods, leading to high rates of accidental exposure. Traditional management includes education, avoidance, and rescue medication. Recent advances in immunotherapy offer promising avenues for the management of PA. Various methods of immunotherapy have been investigated, including oral immunotherapy (OIT), sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT). Immunotherapy is associated with challenges such as adverse effects, the risk of anaphylaxis, and the long-term persistence of tolerance. Combining immunotherapy with adjuvants such as omalizumab and dupilumab or probiotics is promising, but it raises questions about sustained efficacy and patient response after treatment discontinuation. In addition, the translation of clinical trial results into real-world settings remains a critical issue, as shown by low participation rates in immunotherapy programs. Immunotherapy for peanut allergy has the potential to be a game-changer in the treatment of peanut allergies. However, it is important to note that this treatment is not without its challenges. Further research, collaboration between clinicians and researchers, and addressing patient concerns are needed to establish immunotherapy as a safe and effective treatment option for individuals with peanut allergy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents the findings of a large-scale, multi-center study conducted in China on the safety and risk factors associated with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) using a house dust mite (HDM) formulation. The study included 3,132 patients with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma who underwent SCIT. The results showed a low incidence of systemic reactions (SRs) during SCIT, with the majority of SRs being mild. Risk factors for SRs included asthma, disease duration exceeding five years, and high sensitization. The study emphasizes the importance of personalized therapy, early initiation of immunotherapy, and close monitoring to minimize SR risks. [Extracted from the article]

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) has confirmed its efficacy in improving the symptoms of allergic rhinitis. However, no reliable biomarkers have been identified to predict the efficacy of AIT were found. We aimed to find clinical and immunological markers to predict efficacy in children after 2 years of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). A total of 285 children diagnosed with allergic rhinitis were recruited. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by comparing endpoint and baseline symptom and medication scores (SMS). Baseline clinical and immunological markers (serum total and specific immunoglobulin [Ig]E) and their correlation with clinical efficacy were analyzed. Of the 285 children recruited, 249 completed the 2-year SLIT program. After 2 years of SLIT, 68.3% of the children showed a significant response. Children in the Remarkable Response Group had the highest baseline SMS and most extended disease duration, followed by the Effective Relief and Unresponsive Group. Correlation analysis demonstrated that SMS improvement was positively correlated with baseline SMS (r=0.67) and disease duration (r=0.35). SMS improvement was not correlated with age, body mass index, total or specific IgE levels, or their ratios. Our results show that baseline SMS and disease duration can predict the efficacy of SLIT. Our study can guide the selection of suitable candidates for SLIT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Sweden, allergy immunotherapy (AIT) is available as either subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) injections or sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets and is used to treat moderate-severe allergic rhinitis (AR). This study sought to determine treatment-related CO2 emissions and travel times in Swedish patients receiving either SCIT or SLIT-tablets. A list of specialized Swedish AR clinics that administer AIT was determined, and respective co-ordinates retrieved. Swedish municipality population data were obtained from a national database. The mean distance from each Swedish municipality to the nearest AR clinic was calculated, adjusted using a detour index, and weighted by estimated patient population size. Transport modality data were obtained from a Swedish urban transport study and CO2 emissions were obtained from Government sources. The mean number of annual SLIT-tablets and SCIT doses required were calculated based on product labels and clinical expert input. The annual number of healthcare professional interactions were layered into the model to estimate changes in mean patient travel time, distance, and travel-related CO2 emissions associated with using SCIT versus SLIT-tablets. Mean annual travel-related CO2 emissions were 410 tonnes (to two significant figures [s.f.]; standard deviation [SD] 90) with SLIT-tablets, versus 1700 tonnes (SD 380) for SCIT, resulting in mean annual savings of approximately 1300 tonnes (SD 290) of CO2 if all AIT patients were to receive SLIT-tablets instead of SCIT, over 380 times greater than 2021 average Swedish CO2 emissions per capita. Approximate mean annual travel times for patients taking SLIT-tablets were 66,500 h (three s.f.; SD 14,400), and 278,000 h (SD 60,200) for SCIT, resulting in mean annual savings of 211,000 h (SD 45,800) if all AIT patients were to receive SLIT-tablets instead of SCIT. Compared with SCIT injections, SLIT-tablets led to substantial reductions in treatment-related CO2 emissions and travel times for Swedish patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) is a hereditary pruritic and inflammatory allergic skin disease associated with elevated IgE levels. Although, several treatments for CAD exist, allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) is the only treatment that induces tolerance to pathogenic allergens. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is effective, convenient, and safe. This case report describes the successful treatment of a dog with atopic dermatitis using SLIT, emphasizing the efficacy and safety of SLIT as a long-term management strategy for CAD. Case: A 3-year-old spayed female Dachshund presented with non-seasonal chronic pruritus and generalized alopecia. The onset of pruritus occurred at 6 months of age, and its severity, measured by the pruritus visual analog scale, score was 5 out of 10. Dermatological examination revealed alopecia and scales on the dorsum and tail, and alopecia, lichenification, and crust on the medial side of the forelimbs. Diagnostic tests confirmed superficial pyoderma and Malassezia dermatitis. Initial treatment included amoxicillin/clavulanate, itraconazole, and a shampoo containing chlorhexidine gluconate and miconazole nitrate. An elimination diet trial was performed using a commercial diet to diagnose canine adverse food reaction (CAFR). However, 11 days after treatment initiation, the microbial and fungal skin infections and pruritus did not improve. Prednisolone was subsequently prescribed to alleviate pruritus and evaluate the response to glucocorticoids. At 24 days after the administration of prednisolone, pruritus reduction and lesion improvement were observed. Thereafter, prednisolone was tapered to 0.5 mg/kg EOD and discontinued 38 days after the initial administration. After prednisolone discontinuation, cytology did not reveal any cocci or Malassezia sp. Therefore, treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate and itraconazole was discontinued. Two weeks after the discontinuation of prednisolone, pruritus relapsed, and cytology revealed no infection. The dog was initially treated with oclacitinib and planned to be managed with ASIT following an intradermal skin test at 2 weeks later. A provocative challenge was performed after the pruritus, and the lesions were well managed with oclacitinib. Because the clinical signs did not worsen, CAFR was excluded. The Favrot criteria was used to diagnose CAD by ruling out other skin conditions. An intradermal skin test was performed for 27 allergens, and oclacitinib was administered for SLIT, with allergens showing a positive reaction. After the administration of SLIT and oclacitinib, pruritus was well controlled and no recurrence was observed. At 763 days and 1638 days after the commencement of SLIT, oclacitinib and SLIT were discontinued, respectively. Notably, 9 months after discontinuing SLIT, complete remission of CAD was observed. Discussion: ASIT is used in veterinary medicine to treat CAD. A comprehensive clinical study found that SLIT has a success rate of 55%. The oral mucosa's low pro-inflammatory cell counts underscores SLIT's safety. Considering its efficacy and safety, ASIT was initiated with SLIT. ASIT can take > 12 months to improve CAD. Therefore, oclacitinib was prescribed to control pruritus. Complete remission of CAD was confirmed at the time of writing 9 months after SLIT discontinuation. This case indicates that SLIT could be an effective and safe therapeutic option for the long-term management of CAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In children, indoor allergens play a significant role in the development of asthma. Allergen immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases has traditionally been administrated by subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) injections, with certain precautions in administration. Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) could be an alternative to SCIT. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost of SLIT versus SCIT among asthmatic children. Patients and methods: 46 asthmatic children were divided into two groups. Group 1 received SLIT and group 2 received SCIT with close follow up of the patients every 3 months for 9 months regarding the efficacy and safety of allergen immunotherapy using asthma symptoms score, asthma medication scores and quality of life using a validated questionnaire. A cost-effectiveness analysis was done for both routes at the end of the study. Results: Both routes have nearly equal effects on the course of bronchial asthma. SLIT was the easier route of administration (painless and not needing attendance at the doctor's clinic for each dose). Even though its direct cost was more than SCIT, it eliminates the indirect costs of travel expenses for each dose, stable for a longer time in higher temperatures, with less probability of contamination. Conclusion: Allergen immunotherapy in addition to controller medicines significantly improves both symptoms and medication scores with minimal side effects in atopic asthmatic children with the advantage of SLIT over SCIT in this age group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prevalence of allergic diseases, including food allergy, is increasing, especially in developed countries. Implementation of an elimination diet is not a sufficient therapeutic strategy in patients with food allergy, whose quality of life is significantly impaired. In recent years, new effective therapeutic strategies have been developed, such as the application of oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous immunotherapy. Oral immunotherapy is the most often applied strategy because of its effectiveness and ease of application, with an acceptable safety profile. The effectiveness of oral immunotherapy in patients with egg, cow's milk, and peanut allergy has been proven both in terms of raising of the threshold and the development of tolerance, and in some patients, the development of sustainable unresponsiveness. Although oral immunotherapy is an effective treatment for food allergy, several limitations, including a long duration and a significant rate of reported adverse events, reduces its success. Therefore, new therapeutic options, such as treatment with biologicals, either as combinations with food allergen immunotherapy or as monotherapy with the aim of improving the efficacy and safety of treatment, are being investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The increasing prevalence of food allergies worldwide and the subsequent lifethreatening anaphylactic reactions often have sparse treatment options, providing only symptomatic relief. Great strides have been made in research and in clinics in recent years to offer novel therapies for the treatment of allergic disorders. However, current allergen immunotherapy has its own shortcomings in terms of long-term efficacy and safety, due to the local side effects and the possibility of anaphylaxis. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is an established therapy in treating allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, and allergic conjunctivitis. It acts through the downregulation of T cell, and IgE-mediated reactions, as well as desensitization, a process of food tolerance without any allergic events. This would result in a protective reaction that lasts for approximately 3 years, even after the withdrawal of therapy. Furthermore, allergen-specific immunotherapy also exploits several routes such as oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous immunotherapy. As the safety and efficacy of allergen immunotherapy are still under research, the exploration of newer routes such as intra-lymphatic immunotherapy would address unfulfilled needs. In addition, the existence of nanoparticles can be exploited immensely in allergen immunotherapy, which would lead to safer and efficacious therapy. This manuscript highlights a novel drug delivery method for allergen-specific immunotherapy that involves the administration of specific allergens to the patients in gradual increasing doses, to induce desensitization and tolerance, as well as emphasizing different routes of administration, mechanism, and the application of nanoparticles in allergen-specific immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increasing the efficacy of allergen-specific intranasal immunotherapy (INIT) has recently been the main goal of several studies to establish this route as a safe delivery method through mucosal pathways. In this case, the present study evaluated the potential of INIT using ovalbumin (OVA)- loaded mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC)-derived exosomes (Exo-OVA) in an allergic asthma mouse model. Together with control groups, sensitized Balb/c mice underwent intranasal immunotherapy with Exo-OVA (10 µg OVA per dose) for three consecutive weeks. Serum-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß), interleukin (IL)-4, and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production by cultured spleen cells, lung histopathologic analysis, and nasopharyngeal lavage fluid cellular examinations were then conducted. The results showed that INIT using Exo-OVA significantly increased IFN-γ and TGF-ß secretion, while allergen-specific IgE and IL-4 production were dramatically decreased compared to the control group receiving phosphate-buffered saline. In addition, the eosinophil and total cell counts in the nasopharyngeal lavage fluid were reduced, and inflammatory conditions and cell accumulation in lung tissue were ameliorated. In conclusion, the Exo-OVA improved the INIT efficacy compared to free OVA. Therefore, this formulation could be introduced as an effective approach for immunomodulatory purposes with a shorter treatment duration and reduced side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) describes the establishment of peripheral tolerance through repeated allergen exposure, which qualifies as the only curative treatment for allergic diseases. Although conventional subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) have been approved to treat respiratory allergies clinically, the progress made is far from satisfactory. Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) exploits the skin's immune properties to modulate immunological response, which is emerging as a promising alternative and has shown effectiveness in many preclinical and clinical studies for both respiratory and food allergies. It is worth noting that the stratum corneum (SC) barrier impedes the effective delivery of allergens, while disrupting the SC layer excessively often triggers unexpected Th2 immune responses. This work aims to comprehend the immunological mechanisms of EPIT, and summarize the innovative system for sufficient delivery of allergens as well as tolerogenic adjuvants. Finally, the safety, acceptability, and costeffectiveness of these innovative delivery systems are discussed, which directs the development of future immunotherapies with all desirable characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pediatric allergic rhinoconjunctivitis has become a public concern with an increasing incidence year by year. Conventional subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) has long treatment time, high cost and poor compliance. The novel immunotherapy significantly shortens the course of treatment by directly injecting allergens into cervical lymph nodes, which can perform faster clinical benefits to children. Objective: By comparing with SCIT, this study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of intra-cervical lymphatic immunotherapy (ICLIT). Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled study. A total of 50 allergic rhinoconjunctivitis children with dust mite allergy was randomly divided into ICLIT group and SCIT group, receiving three cervical intralymphatic injections of dust mite allergen or three years of subcutaneous injection, separately. Primary outcomes included total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), total ocular symptom scores (TOSS), total symptom scores (TSS), total medication scores (TMS), and total quality of life score. Secondary outcomes included pain perception and adverse reactions during treatment. Other secondary outcome was change in Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Derp) and Dermatophagoides farina (Derf) -specific IgE level. Results: Both groups had significantly decreased TNSS, TOSS, TSS, TMS, and total quality of life score after 36 months of treatment (p<0.0001). Compared with SCIT, ICLIT could rapidly improve allergic symptoms (p<0.0001). The short-term efficacy was consistent between the two groups (p=0.07), while the long-term efficacy was better in SCIT group (p<0.0001). The pain perception in ICLIT group was lower than that in SCIT group (p<0.0001). ICLIT group was safer. Specifically, the children had only 3 mild local adverse reactions without systemic adverse reactions. The SCIT group had 14 systemic adverse reactions. At last, the serum Derp and Derf-specific IgE levels in ICLIT and SCIT groups decreased 3 years later (p<0.0001). Conclusion: ICLIT could ameliorate significantly the allergic symptoms in pediatric patients with an advantage in effectiveness and safety, besides an improved life quality including shortened period of treatment, frequency of drug use and pain perception. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying therapy for allergic conditions, resulting in a long-lasting tolerance beyond the duration of the treatment. Due to the strong relationship between the effectiveness, its optimal duration (at least three years) and the observation of the correct administration protocol, appropriate adherence to the plan of treatment represents a critical factor for the therapeutical success of AIT. Methods. Analysis of studies about the rate of adherence in subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy, which are the main routes of administration of AIT. Results. There are different causes leading to a premature interruption of the therapy or to it being incorrectly carried out; the most reported include erroneous expectations of the effectiveness and the adverse effects, economic issues, inconvenience and unrelated clinical conditions. Conclusions. An attentive analysis of the main causes of dropouts may be useful to improve the management of these patients and to develop new strategies for a personalized approach. These strategies should be dynamic, involving attentive communication between the physician and the patient about all the possible criticalities, especially in the initial phase of the therapy, and facilitating, as much as possible, access to healthcare providers over the course of the maintenance phase, including by exploiting technological tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coordinated IgG2 and IgE responses as a marker of allergen immunotherapy efficacy. Such coordinated specific IgG2 and IgE responses were not observed in low responders, but were observed in high responders, for both the I Der f i - ( I p i < .01; Figure 1B,C) and the I Der p- i specific responses ( I p i < .05; Figure 2B,C). Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only approach recognized as an etiologic treatment of allergy with long-lasting effects.[1] Numerous studies have shown that AIT is accompanied by changes in cellular (e.g., ILC2, Th2A, B and Treg, Tfh) and humoral (e.g., IgE, IgG4, and IgA) parameters.[2] However, no biomarkers have been established to date that either predict or associate with the outcome of AIT.[3] Recent studies focusing on IgG2 antibodies showed an increase in grass pollen or house dust mite (HDM) allergen-specific IgG2 in the course of AIT with sublingual tablets.[[4]] Particularly, coordinated IgG2 and IgE responses have been observed after 1 year of AIT in European allergic individuals, but only in those exhibiting high clinical benefit (high responders), when compared to low responders.[5] The present study aimed to confirm those results with a cohort of HDM-allergic Japanese individuals, and to assess HDM specific-IgG2 responses as early as 4 months after AIT initiation. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are allergens found in a wide range of plant-foods. Specifically, Pru p 3, the major allergen of peach, is commonly responsible for severe allergic reactions. The need for new alternatives to conventional food allergy treatments, like restrictive diets, suggests allergen immunotherapy as a promising option. It has been demonstrated that sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with synthetic glycodendropeptides, such as D1ManPrup3, containing mannose and Pru p 3 peptides induced tolerance in mice and that the persistence of this effect depends on treatment dose (2nM or 5nM). Moreover, it produces changes associated with differential gene expression and methylation profile of dendritic cells, as well as phenotypical changes in regulatory T cells (Treg). However, there are no works addressing the study of epigenetic changes in terms of methylation in the cell subsets that sustain tolerant responses, Treg. Therefore, in this work, DNA methylation changes in splenic-Treg from Pru p 3 anaphylactic mice were evaluated. Methods: It was performed by whole genome bisulphite sequencing comparing SLIT-D1ManPrup3 treated mice: tolerant (2nM D1ManPrup3), desensitized (5nM D1ManPrup3), and sensitized but not treated (antigenonly), with anaphylactic mice. Results: Most of the methylation changes were found in the gene promoters from both SLIT-treated groups, desensitized (1,580) and tolerant (1,576), followed by the antigen-only (1,151) group. Although tolerant and desensitized mice showed a similar number of methylation changes, only 445 genes were shared in both. Remarkably, interesting methylation changes were observed on the promoter regions of critical transcription factors for Treg function like Stat4, Stat5a, Stat5b, Foxp3, and Gata3. In fact, Foxp3 was observed exclusively as hypomethylated in tolerant group, whereas Gata3 was only hypomethylated in the desensitized mice. Discussion: In conclusion, diverse D1ManPrup3 doses induce different responses (tolerance or desensitization) in mice, which are reflected by differential methylation changes in Tregs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Canine atopic dermatitis and feline atopic skin syndrome are common presentations in small animal practice. Numerous drugs are used for symptomatic therapy. The only definitive treatment based on the cause of the disease is allergen immunotherapy. Classical allergen immunotherapy (AIT) consists of subcutaneous injections of an extract containing offending allergens, with increasing doses and allergen concentrations at short intervals during the induction phase of several weeks to months followed by a maintenance phase, where a fixed dose is typically given at longer intervals. Dose and interval are tailored to the individual patient. Newer types of AIT include rush immunotherapy, where the induction phase is abbreviated, intralymphatic immunotherapy, and oromucosal or sublingual immunotherapy. AIT aims at inducing a regulatory T-cell response and subsequently downregulating the exaggerated immune response to offending allergens leading to clinical signs. This article reviews the published knowledge about allergen immunotherapy in dogs and cats for small animal practitioners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nonrandomized studies (NRS) on allergen immunotherapy (AIT) particularly lend themselves to evaluate outcomes that are insufficiently addressed in randomized controlled studies (RCTs). However, NRS are prone to several sources of bias, which limit their validity. We aimed at comparing AIT effects between RCTs and NRS and evaluate the reasons for discrepancies in study results. In this analysis, we compared NRS on AIT (including subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy, SCIT and SLIT, respectively) with SLIT and SCIT RCTs from published meta‐analyses, assessing the Risk of Bias (RoB) for each study and the certainty of evidence from NRS and RCTs using the GRADE approach. We found: (1) very serious RoB in the 7 NRS included in the meta‐analysis showing a large difference between AIT and controls (standardized mean difference [SMD] for symptom score [SS], −1.77; 95% CI, −2.30, −1.24; p <.001; I2 = 95%) with very low certainty evidence; (2) serious RoB in the 13 SCIT‐RCTs reporting a moderate‐to‐high difference between SCIT and controls (SMD for SS, −0.81; 95% CI, −1.12, −0.49; p <.001; I2 = 88%) with moderate certainty evidence; (3) low RoB in the 13 SLIT‐RCTs reporting a small benefit (SMD for SS, −0.28; 95% CI, −0.37, −0.19; p <.001; I2 = 54.2%) with high certainty evidence. Similar results were reported for medication score. Our evidence is sufficient to conclude that the magnitude of effect estimates of NRS and RCTs directly correlate with the degree of RoB and inversely with the overall evidence certainty. NRS, which are more affected than RCTs by bias resulting in low certainty evidence, showed the largest effect size. Sound NRS are needed to complement RCTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the new guidelines on the management of IgE-mediated food allergy issued by the European Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology (EAACI). These guidelines provide recommendations for the treatment of food allergies, including allergen-specific immunotherapy and the inclusion of tolerated foods in the diet. The guidelines also emphasize the importance of addressing economic issues, health disparities, and mental health needs in food allergy management. The article acknowledges the gaps in evidence and the need for further research to personalize care and optimize treatment options. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a widespread disease with increasing prevalence in developed countries. The only treatment that tackles the underlying causes is allergen immunotherapy (AIT). This treatment is performed through two application routes, the subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) or the sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). However, persistence during the long course of treatment over 3 years is key for the efficacy of this treatment option. The impaired adherence significantly impacts public health resources. The aim of this study was to assess the persistence of AIT for both application routes. Methods: IQVIATM LRx was used to identify patients starting AIT between 2009 and 2018 with grass pollen (GP), early flowering tree pollen (EFTP) and house dust mite (HDM) allergens. Patients were classified within each allergen category by AIT groups (subcutaneous depigmented polymerised allergen AIT [dSCIT], other subcutaneous AIT [oSCIT] and SLIT) and age (5‐11 years, 12‐17 years, 18+ years). Furthermore, they were followed up for up to 3 years until the cessation of treatment. Patients, who were still on treatment after 3 years were deemed to be censored. Kaplan‐Meier curves of persistence were generated and compared by log‐rank tests. Results: The number of patients included in the three allergen categories was 38,717 GP, 23,183 EFTP, and 41,728 HDM AIT. In all allergen categories and for any product group, patient persistence decreased with increasing age class with the difference between 5‐11 years and 12‐17 years greater than between the latter and 18+ years. The percentage of patients completing the first year of AIT was low, particularly for SLIT where 22.2%–27.1% of patients remained persistent after 12 months. The equivalent figures for dSCIT were 52.0%–64.1% and for oSCIT 38.3%–50.3%. Conclusion: Persistence in AIT in AR was low in this retrospective prescription‐based database and was clearly linked to patient age and application route. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]