Search

Objectives: Despite progress in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, severe complications are common, and the need of supportive care is high. We explored the cumulative prevalence, clinical risk factors, and outcomes of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, on first-line leukemia treatment in the ICUs in Sweden., Design: A nationwide prospective register and retrospective chart review study., Setting: Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia were identified, and demographic and clinical data were obtained from the Swedish Childhood Cancer Registry. Data on intensive care were collected from the Swedish Intensive Care Registry. Data on patients with registered ICU admission in the Swedish Childhood Cancer Registry were supplemented through questionnaires to the pediatric oncology centers., Patients: All 637 children 0-17.9 years old with acute lymphoblastic leukemia diagnosed between June 2008 and December 2016 in Sweden were included., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-eight percent of the children (178/637) were admitted to an ICU at least once. The Swedish Intensive Care Registry data were available for 96% of admissions (241/252). An ICU admission was associated with poor overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.97-5.36; p ≤ 0.0001). ICU admissions occurred often during early treatment; 48% (85/178) were admitted to the ICU before the end of the first month of acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment (induction therapy). Children with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or CNS leukemia had a higher risk of being admitted to the ICU in multivariable analyses, both for early admissions before the end of induction therapy and for all admissions during the study period., Conclusions: The need for intensive care in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, especially for children with T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and CNS leukemia, is high with most admissions occurring during early treatment., Competing Interests: Dr. Ranta’s institution received funding from the Stockholm County Council, the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, and Pediatric Network on haemophilia management; she received support for article research from the Stockholm County Council (ALF project). Drs. Ranta and Heyman received support for article research from the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation. Dr. Broman received funding from Eurosets and Xenios. Dr. Abrahamsson received support for article research from the Children’s Cancer Foundation Sweden. Dr. Heyman’s institution received funding from Servier and Pfizer. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Aim: Risk of treatment-related life-threatening toxicity is high in childhood acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), and access to intensive care units (ICU) is crucial. We explored the ICU admission rate and outcome after intensive care in childhood AML in Sweden. Methods: Patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2016 were identified from the Swedish Childhood Cancer Registry (SCCR), a national quality registry. Data from SCCR was cross-referenced with clinical questionnaire data from paediatric oncology centers and the Swedish Intensive Care Registry (SIR), another national quality registry. Results: According to combined data, 46% of the children (58/126) were admitted to ICU, 17% (21/126) within 1 month from diagnosis. Overall, ICU mortality per admission was 12% and 6% during first-line treatment. There was a discrepancy between admission rate from the clinical questionnaires and SCCR (29%; 36/126 children) and SIR (44%; 55/126) All deaths during first-line treatment occurred at or after ICU care. Conclusion: Although admission rate under AML treatment was high, the treatment-related mortality under first-line treatment was low. No child died under first-line treatment without admission to ICU, suggesting good availability. The discrepancy between the two registries, SCCR and SIR, highlights the need for future validation of registry data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: General selenium supplementation to intensive care unit (ICU) patients in regions with selenium-rich soil does not improve outcomes. Still selenium supplementation may reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with low-serum selenium concentration (S-Se) in selenium-poor areas who respond to treatment. The primary aim of this observational study was to investigate S-Se in a selenium-deficient region at time of intensive care admission, and in addition to monitor S-Se during high-dose selenium supplementation for safety.Methods: We measured S-Se in 100 consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary general ICU. After initial sampling, high-dose intravenous (iv) selenium supplementation was administered up to 20 days.Results: At admission, in 95% of the cases, S-Se was below the saturation level for selenoenzymes, in 91%, below the Swedish reference level, and in 71%, below the level where selenoenzyme function may be impaired. At day 5 of substitution, all patients still remaining in the ICU (n = 26) were within the range for enzyme function, 12% were below reference, and 24% did not reach full enzymatic saturation. At day 10 and forward, all patients were within target for treatment. No patients were at risk for toxic S-Se concentration.Conclusions: S-Se concentration was substantially lower compared to normal values at ICU admission in this cohort of unselected Swedish critical care patients. Selenium supplementation restituted S-Se to levels corresponding to enzymatic saturation and the Swedish reference interval for all subjects remaining in the ICU on day 5. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple prognostic scores have been developed for both veno-arterial (VA) and veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), mostly in single-center cohorts. The aim of this study was to compare and validate different prediction scores in a large multicenter ECMO-population. Methods: Data from five ECMO centers included 300 patients on VA and 329 on VV ECMO support (March 2008 to November 2016). Different prognostic scores were compared between survivors and non-survivors: APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II in all patients; SAVE, modified SAVE and MELD-XI in VA ECMO; RESP, PRESET, ROCH and PRESERVE in VV ECMO. Model performance was compared using receiver-operating-curve analysis and assessment of model calibration. Survival was assessed at intensive care unit discharge. Results: The main indication for VA ECMO was cardiogenic shock; overall survival was 51%. ICU survivors had higher Glasgow Coma Scale scores and pH, required cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) less frequently, had lower lactate levels and shorter ventilation time pre-ECMO at baseline. The best discrimination between survivors and non-survivors was observed with the SAPS II score (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.73 (95% CI 0.67–0.78)). The main indication for VV ECMO was pneumonia; overall survival was 60%. Lower PaCO2, higher pH, lower lactate and lesser need for CPR were observed among survivors. The best discrimination between survivors and non-survivors was observed with the PRESET score (AUC 0.66 (95% CI 0.60–0.72)). Conclusion: The prognostic performance of most scores was moderate in ECMO patients. The use of such scores to decide about ECMO implementation in potential candidates should be discouraged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mechanical power (MP) represents a useful parameter to describe and quantify the forces applied to the lungs during mechanical ventilation (MV). In this multi-center, prospective, observational study, we analyzed MP variations following MV adjustments after veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) initiation. We also investigated whether the MV parameters (including MP) in the early phases of VV ECMO run may be related to the intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Thirty-five patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome were prospectively enrolled and analyzed. After VV ECMO initiation, we observed a significant decrease in median MP (32.4 vs. 8.2 J/min, p < 0.001), plateau pressure (27 vs. 21 cmH2O, p = 0.012), driving pressure (11 vs. 8 cmH2O, p = 0.014), respiratory rate (RR, 22 vs. 14 breaths/min, p < 0.001), and tidal volume adjusted to patient ideal body weight (VT/IBW, 5.5 vs. 4.0 mL/kg, p = 0.001) values. During the early phase of ECMO run, RR (17 vs. 13 breaths/min, p = 0.003) was significantly higher, while positive end-expiratory pressure (10 vs. 14 cmH2O, p = 0.048) and VT/IBW (3.0 vs. 4.0 mL/kg, p = 0.028) were lower in ICU non-survivors, when compared to the survivors. The observed decrease in MP after ECMO initiation did not influence ICU outcome. Waiting for large studies assessing the role of these parameters in VV ECMO patients, RR and MP monitoring should not be underrated during ECMO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a rescue therapy for refractory cardiac arrest, but its high mortality has raised questions about patient selection. No selection criteria have been proposed for patients experiencing in-hospital cardiac arrest. We aimed to identify selection criteria available at the time ECPR was considered for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. We analyzed data of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients undergoing ECPR in our extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) center (March 2007 to March 2019). Intensive care unit (ICU) and 1-year survival post-hospital discharge were assessed. Factors associated with ICU survival before ECPR were investigated. An external validation cohort from a previous multicenter study was used to validate our results. Among the 137 patients (67.9% men; median [IQR] age, 54 [43–62] years; low-flow duration, 45 [30–70] min) requiring ECPR, 32.1% were weaned-off ECMO. Their respective ICU- and 1-year survival rates were 21.9% and 19%. Most 1-year survivors had favorable neurological outcomes (cerebral performance category score 1 or 2). ICU survivors compared to nonsurvivors, respectively, were more likely to have a shockable initial rhythm (53.3% versus 24.3%; P < 0.01), a shorter median (IQR) low-flow time (30 (25–53) versus 50 (35–80) min, P < 0.01) and they more frequently underwent a subsequent intervention (63.3% versus 26.2%, P < 0.01). The algorithm obtained by combining age, initial rhythm and low-flow duration discriminated between patient groups with very different survival probabilities in the derivation and validation cohorts. Survival of ECPR-managed in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in this cohort was poor but hospital survivors' 1-year neurological outcomes were favorable. When deciding whether or not to use ECPR, the combination of age, initial rhythm and low-flow duration can improve patient selection. • This cohort study gathered 137 patients with refractory in-hospital cardiac arrest requiring ECPR. • 1-year survival was 19% and most of survivors had favorable neurological outcome. • An algorithm based on age, initial rhythm (shockable or not) and low-flow duration identifies among patients those with the highest–as well as those with the lowest– probability of survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]