1. Main differences between two highly effective lipid-lowering therapies in subclasses of lipoproteins in patients with acute myocardial infarction
- Author
-
Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar, Francisco Antonio Helfenstein Fonseca, Ana Paula de Queiroz Mello, Amanda Santoro Fonseca Bacchin, Carolina Nunes França, Antônio Martins Figueiredo Neto, Leticia C. S. Pinto, Flavio T. Moreira, Rui Póvoa, Nágila Raquel Teixeira Damasceno, Adriano Caixeta, and Henrique Tria Bianco
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Simvastatin ,RC620-627 ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Lipoproteins ,Clinical Biochemistry ,Hypercholesterolemia ,Gastroenterology ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Endocrinology ,Ezetimibe ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Rosuvastatin ,Myocardial infarction ,Rosuvastatin Calcium ,Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases ,Aged ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Cholesterol ,Research ,Biochemistry (medical) ,Cholesterol, LDL ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Atherosclerosis ,Lipids ,chemistry ,Liver ,ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction ,lipids (amino acids, peptides, and proteins) ,Female ,Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors ,business ,Lipid profile ,medicine.drug ,Lipidology ,Lipoprotein - Abstract
Background Large observational studies have shown that small, dense LDL subfractions are related to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This study assessed the effects of two highly effective lipid-lowering therapies in the atherogenic subclasses of lipoproteins in subjects with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods Patients of both sexes admitted with their first myocardial infarction and submitted to pharmacoinvasive strategy (N = 101) were included and randomized using a central computerized system to receive a daily dose of simvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg or rosuvastatin 20 mg for 30 days. Intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions were analysed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Lipoprint System) on the first (D1) and 30th days (D30) of lipid-lowering therapy. Changes in LDL and IDL subfractions between D1 and D30 were compared between the lipid-lowering therapies (Mann-Whitney U test). Results The classic lipid profile was similar in both therapy arms at D1 and D30. At D30, the achievement of lipid goals was comparable between lipid-lowering therapies. Cholesterol content in atherogenic subclasses of LDL (p = 0.043) and IDL (p = 0.047) decreased more efficiently with simvastatin plus ezetimibe than with rosuvastatin. Conclusions Lipid-lowering therapy with simvastatin plus ezetimibe was associated with a better pattern of lipoprotein subfractions than rosuvastatin monotherapy. This finding was noted despite similar effects in the classic lipid profile and may contribute to residual cardiovascular risk. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02428374, registered on 28/09/2014.
- Published
- 2021