Search

Background Chest radiation therapy (CRT) for malignant thoracic neoplasms is associated with development of valvular heart disease years later. As previous radiation exposure can complicate surgical treatment, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative. However, outcomes data are lacking for TAVR patients with a history of CRT. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of all patients who underwent a TAVR procedure at a single institution between September 2012 and November 2018. Among 1341 total patients, 50 had previous CRT. These were propensity-matched in a 1:2 ratio to 100 patients without history of CRT. Thirty-day adverse events were analyzed with generalized estimating equation models. Overall mortality was analyzed with stratified Cox regression modelling. Results Median clinical follow-up was 24 months (interquartile range [IQR], 12–44 months). There was no difference between CRT and non-CRT patients in overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84 [0.37–1.90], P = 0.67), 30-day mortality (HR 3.1 [0.49–20.03], P = 0.23), or 30-day readmission rate (HR 1.0 [0.43–2.31], P = 1). There were no differences in the rates of most adverse events, but patients with CRT history had higher rates of postprocedural respiratory failure (HR 3.63 [1.32–10.02], P = 0.01) and permanent pacemaker implantation (HR 2.84 [1.15–7.01], P = 0.02). Conclusions For patients with aortic valve stenosis and previous CRT, TAVR is safe and effective, with outcomes similar to those in the general aortic stenosis population. Patients with history of CRT are more likely to have postprocedural respiratory failure and to require permanent pacemaker implantation.

Graphical abstract, Highlights • Cor triatriatum dexter (CTD) can complicate percutaneous atrial septal interventions. • Clinically silent (forme fruste) CTD is detectable by new echocardiography techniques. • Using these techniques could improve patient selection and guide interventions.

Guidelines have been previously published for the use of echocardiography during each of the various phases of care for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients [1]. This chapter focuses on the use of surveillance echocardiography either before hospital discharge or during routine scheduled follow-up appointments. Surveillance examinations can confirm individual patients’ baseline echo parameters, which can later be used for problem solving if the patient presents with new abnormal signs or symptoms. Also, surveillance examinations can detect abnormalities of the native heart and pump malfunctions that might otherwise remain occult, particularly in less active patients.

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), in partnership with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted a review of common clinical scenarios where noninvasive vascular testing (venous ultrasound and physiological testing) is frequently considered. The indications (clinical

Steven R. Bailey, MD, FACC, FSCAI, FAHA, Moderator Andrea M. Russo, MD, FACC, FHRS, Writing Group Liaison [⁎][1] Suraj Kapa, MD, Writing Group Liaison Michael B. Alexander, MD, FACC[§][2] Steven R. Bailey, MD, FACC, FSCAI, FAHA[∥][3] Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green, MD, FHRS[∥][3] Alan S.

The past several decades have seen rapid and extensive changes in the practice of cardiology, especially in the innovation and utilization practices of imaging, interventional, and electrophysiology procedures. Enhanced radionuclide imaging techniques, evolution of echocardiography, development of

Background The unique findings on transthoracic echocardiography of the HeartWare left ventricular assist device (LVAD) have not been previously described. Methods and Results HeartWare LVADs were implanted in 19 patients from May 2009 through December 2010; 152 comprehensive transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) performed postoperatively on these patients were retrospectively analyzed for device component visualization, inlet cannula/outflow conduit flow velocities, and imaging artifacts. The inlet cannula was adequately visualized in 66% of studies, incompletely visualized in 14%, and not visualized in 20%. Spectral Doppler interrogation of inlet cannula flow velocity was always uninterpretable due to artifact. Standard parasternal long-axis and apical views always included the inlet cannula in the imaging sector, resulting in a prominent “waterfall” color Doppler artifact obscuring the mitral valve. Inclusion of the inlet cannula in the imaging sector also precluded spectral Doppler interrogation of the mitral valve owing to artifact. The outflow conduit was partially visualized and interrogated by spectral Doppler in 68% of studies, and the average measured peak flow velocity was 1.4 m/s (range 1.0–1.9 m/s). Conclusions The HeartWare LVAD inlet cannula and outflow conduit are both readily visualized by TTE in a majority of patients. However, significant color and spectral Doppler artifacts occur when the inlet cannula is visualized in the imaging sector, necessitating routine off-axis Doppler interrogation of the mitral valve.

The American College of Cardiology Foundation, in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted a review of common clinical scenarios where diagnostic catheterization is frequently considered. The indications (clinical scenarios) were derived from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines and results of studies examining the implementation of noninvasive imaging appropriate use criteria. The 166 indications in this document were developed by a diverse writing group and scored by a separate independent technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9, to designate appropriate use (median 7 to 9), uncertain use (median 4 to 6), and inappropriate use (median 1 to 3). Diagnostic catheterization may include several different procedure components. The indications developed focused primarily on 2 aspects of diagnostic catheterization. Many indications focused on the performance of coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease with other procedure components (e.g., hemodynamic measurements, ventriculography) at the discretion of the operator. The majority of the remaining indications focused on hemodynamic measurements to evaluate valvular heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy, and other conditions, with the use of coronary angiography at the discretion of the operator. Seventy-five indications were rated as appropriate, 49 were rated as uncertain, and 42 were rated as inappropriate. The appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization have the potential to impact physician decision making, healthcare delivery, and reimbursement policy. Furthermore, recognition of uncertain clinical scenarios facilitates identification of areas that would benefit from future research. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an update of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization frequently considered. In the initial document, 180 clinical scenarios were developed to mimic patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included information on symptom status, extent of medical therapy, risk level as assessed by noninvasive testing, and coronary anatomy. This update provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios the writing group felt to be affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria. The methodology used in this update is similar to the initial document, and the definition of appropriateness was unchanged. The technical panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate and likely to improve patients' health outcomes or survival. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate revascularization is considered inappropriate and unlikely to improve health outcomes or survival. Scores in the mid-range (4 to 6) indicate a clinical scenario for which the likelihood that coronary revascularization will improve health outcomes or survival is uncertain. In general, as seen with the prior AUC, the use of coronary revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndromes and combinations of significant symptoms and/or ischemia is appropriate. In contrast, revascularization of asymptomatic patients or patients with low-risk findings on noninvasive testing and minimal medical therapy are viewed less favorably. The technical panel felt that based on recent studies, coronary artery bypass grafting remains an appropriate method of revascularization for patients with high burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). Additionally, percutaneous coronary intervention may have a role in revascularization of patients with high burden of CAD. The primary objective of the appropriate use criteria is to improve physician decision making and patient education regarding expected benefits from revascularization and to guide future research.

Recent advances in the field of left ventricular device support have led to an increased use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) in patients with end stage heart disease. The primary imaging modality to monitor patients with LVADs has been echocardiography. The purpose of this review is to highlight the clinical role of echo and other noninvasive imaging modalities in the assessment of cardiac structure and function in patients with pulsatile and continuous flow LVADs. In addition, we discuss the role of imaging with emphasis on echo to detect LVAD dysfunction and device related complications.

Three patients from different centers with pacemaker or ICD leads endocardially implanted in the left ventricle are described. All leads, two ventricular pacing leads and one ICD lead, were inserted through a patent foramen ovale or an atrial septum defect. The diagnosis was made 9 months, 14 months, and 16 years, respectively, after implantation. All patients had right bundle branch block configuration during ventricular pacing. Chest X ray was suggestive of a left-sided positioned lead except in the ICD patient. Diagnosis was confirmed with echocardiography in all patients. One patient with a ventricular pacing lead presented with a transient ischemic attack at 1-month postimplantation. During surgical repair of the atrial septum defect 14 months later, the lead was extracted and thrombus was attached to the lead despite therapy with aspirin. The other patients were asymptomatic without anticoagulation (9 months and 16 years after implant). No thrombus was present on the ICD lead at the time of the cardiac transplantation in one patient. We reviewed 27 patients with permanent leads described in the literature. Ten patients experienced thromboembolic complications, including three of ten patients on antiplatelet therapy. The lead was removed in six patients, anticoagulation with warfarin was effective for secondary prevention in the four remaining patients. In the asymptomatic patients, the lead was removed in five patients. In the remaining patients, 1 patient was on warfarin, 2 were on antiplatelet therapy, and in 3 patients the medication was unknown. After malposition was diagnosed, three additional patients were treated with warfarin. In conclusion, if timely removal of a malpositioned lead in the left ventricle is not preformed, lifelong anticoagulation with warfarin can be recommended as the first choice therapy and lead extraction reserved in case of failure or during concomitant surgery.

Objectives.This study sought to determine the prognostic yield and utility of transesophageal echocardiography in critically ill patients with unexplained hypotension.Background.Transesophageal echocardiography is increasingly utilized in the intensive care setting and is particularly suited for the evaluation of hypotension; however, the prognostic yield of transesophageal echocardiography in these patients is unknown.Methods.We prospectively studied 61 adult patients in the intensive care unit with sustained (>60 min) unexplained hypotension. Both transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography were performed, and results were immediately disclosed to the primary physician, who reported any resulting changes in management. Patients were classified on the basis of transesophageal echocardiographic findings into one of three prognostic groups: 1) nonventricular (valvular, pericardial) cardiac limitation to cardiac output; 2) ventricular failure; and 3) noncardiac systemic disease (hypovolemia or low systemic vascular resistance, or both). Primary end points were death or discharge from the intensive care unit.Results.A transesophageal echocardiographic diagnosis of nonventricular limitation to cardiac output was associated with improved survival to discharge from the intensive care unit (81%) versus a diagnosis of ventricular disease (41%) or hypovolemia/ low systemic vascular resistance (44%, p = 0.03). Twenty-nine (64%) of 45 transthoracic echocardiographic studies were inadequate compared with 2 (3%) of 61 transesophageal echocardiographic studies (p < 0.001). Transesophageal echocardiography contributed new clinically significant diagnoses (not seen with transthoracic echocardiography) in 17 patients (28%), leading to operation in 12 (20%).Conclusions.Transesophageal echocardiography makes a clinically important contribution to the diagnosis and management of unexplained hypotension and predicts prognosis in the critical care setting.

The American College of Cardiology Foundation, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an appropriate use review of common clinical scenarios where cardiac computed tomography (CCT) is frequently considered. The present document is an update to the original CCT/cardiac magnetic resonance appropriateness criteria published in 2006, written to reflect changes in test utilization, to incorporate new clinical data, and to clarify CCT use where omissions or lack of clarity existed in the original criteria.1 The indications for this review were drawn from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines. Ninety-three clinical scenarios were developed by a writing group and scored by a separate technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9 to designate appropriate use, inappropriate use, or uncertain use. In general, use of CCT angiography for diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with low or intermediate risk or pretest probability for coronary artery disease was viewed favorably, whereas testing in high-risk patients, routine repeat testing, and general screening in certain clinical scenarios were viewed less favorably. Use of noncontrast computed tomography for calcium scoring was rated as appropriate within intermediate- and selected low-risk patients. Appropriate applications of CCT are also within the category of cardiac structural and functional evaluation. It is anticipated that these results will have an impact on physician decision making, performance, and reimbursement policy, and that they will help guide future research. In an effort to respond to the need for the rational use of imaging services in the delivery of high-quality care, the ACCF has undertaken a process to determine the appropriate use of cardiovascular imaging for selected patient indications. Appropriate use criteria publications reflect an ongoing effort by the ACCF to critically and systematically create, review, and categorize clinical situations where diagnostic tests and procedures …

Although the long-term prognosis for patients with a normal dobutamine stress echocardiographic result is good, most studies have focused on men. We assessed the long-term cardiac prognosis for women by reviewing the cases of 100 women who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography for suspected coronary artery disease and found that women with a normal result have an excellent long-term cardiac prognosis.

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) together with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an appropriateness review for stress echocardiography. The review assessed the risks and benefits of stress echocardiography for several indications or clinical scenarios and scored them on a scale of 1 to 9 (based upon methodology developed by the ACCF to assess imaging appropriateness). The upper range (7 to 9) implies that the test is generally acceptable and is a reasonable approach, and the lower range (1 to 3) implies that the test is generally not acceptable and is not a reasonable approach. The midrange (4 to 6) indicates a clinical scenario for which the indication for a stress echocardiogram is uncertain. The indications for this review were drawn from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines. Use of stress echocardiography for risk assessment in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) was viewed favorably, while routine repeat testing and general screening in certain clinical scenarios were viewed less favorably. It is anticipated that these results will have a significant impact on physician decision making and performance, reimbursement policy, and will help guide future research.

Left Atrium (LA) size has prognostic importance in a variety of cardiac conditions [1] and is known to be enlarged with decreased contractile function in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) [2]. Nearly 5 million Americans have CHF [3] and a majority of these patients display diastolic dysfunction, which is an abnormality in the left ventricle (LV) myocardial relaxation and/or compliance that alters the ease with which the blood is accepted into the LV from the LA during diastole [4]. Due to abnormal LV filling, the LA experiences intense stress and elevated pressures. In fact, the left atrium is exposed directly to the LV diastolic pressure through the open mitral valve (MV) and because of its thin wall structure it tends to dilate with increasing pressure [5]. This augmented LA size and increased contractility and booster function are some of the mechanisms compensating for decreased early filling in patients with reduced LV compliance [6]. Over time, the LA compensatory contribution decreases, this may lead to intrinsic left atrium dysfunction [7]. This in turn results in a progressive decline in health unless the hearts’ inadequate blood flow is augmented by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Although LVAD implantation rest the heart, restores function to the ventricle [8], and improve overall function [9], its effects on the left atrium remain unclear. The purpose of the present study was to use 2D and Doppler echocardiography to define the parameters for assessing LVAD unloading and determine its effect on LA diameter, area, volume, and pressure in patients prior to and following LVAD implantation.Copyright © 2007 by ASME

The experimental calf model is used to assess mechanical circulatory support devices and prosthetic heart valves. Baseline indices of cardiac function have been established for the normal awake calf but not for the anesthetized calf. Therefore, we gathered hemodynamic and echocardiographic data from 16 healthy anesthetized calves (mean age, 189.0 +/- 87.0 days; mean body weight, 106.9 +/- 32.3 kg) by cardiac catheterization and noninvasive echocardiography, respectively. Baseline hemodynamic data included heart rate (65 +/- 12 beats per minute), mean aortic pressure (113.5 +/- 17.4 mm Hg), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (16.3 +/- 38.9 mm Hg), and mean pulmonary artery pressure (21.7 +/- 8.3 mm Hg). Baseline two-dimensional echocardiographic data included left ventricular systolic dimension (3.5 +/- 0.7 cm), left ventricular diastolic dimension (5.6 +/- 0.8 cm), end-systolic intraventricular septal thickness (1.7 +/- 0.2 cm), end-diastolic intraventricular septal thickness (1.2 +/- 0.2 cm), ejection fraction (63 +/- 10%), and fractional shortening (37 +/- 10%). Doppler echocardiography revealed a maximum aortic valve velocity of 0.9 +/- 0.5 m/s and a cardiac index of 3.7 +/- 1.1 L/minute/m2. The collected baseline data will be useful in assessing prosthetic heart valves, cardiac assist pumps, new cannulation techniques, and robotics applications in the anesthetized calf model and in developing calf models of various cardiovascular diseases.

Background The bileaflet valve is currently the mechanical replacement valve of choice. Though durable, it does not closely mimic native valve hemodynamics and remains potentially thrombogenic. Methods Prototype trileaflet valves (T1 and T2) were implanted in the mitral position in calves. Group I calves received either a T1 valve (n = 12) or a control bileaflet valve (n = 5); Group II, either a T2 valve (n = 7) or a control bileaflet valve (n = 5). Valve function, perivalvular leakage, and transvalvular pressure gradients were evaluated. Also, long-term prototype leaflet wear was evaluated in vivo in one Group I calf (502 days) and two Group II calves (385 and 366 days). Calves were euthanized and necropsied at study termination, and major organs weighed and examined. Results Valve function was excellent and hematologic parameters remained normal in all calves that survived to study termination. Mean peak transvalvular pressure gradients were 10 ± 7 mm Hg for T1 valves, 6 ± 3 mm Hg for T2 valves, and 12 ± 4 mm Hg for bileaflet control valves. Clinically insignificant valvular regurgitation was observed in both prototypes. Explanted valves showed no thrombus-impaired leaflet motion, except in two T1-fitted calves and one T2-fitted calf. Major organs showed no evidence of clinically significant thromboembolic events. There were no other significant differences between the results of experimental and control groups. Conclusions Prototype trileaflet valves performed safely and effectively in the mitral position in calves, even without long-term anticoagulation. This warrants their evaluation as an equivalent alternative to bileaflet valves.

A 21-year-old man presented with syncope and a heart murmur. Screening echocardiography revealed severe asymmetric septal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (thickness, 3.7 cm). No resting or provocable left ventricular outflow obstruction was present. Because the patient was not an athlete and performed no regular …

ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to evaluate whether quantitation of thrombus burden with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can help risk-stratify patients undergoing thrombolysis of prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT).BackgroundThrombolytic therapy of PVT has an unpredictable risk of embolization and complications.MethodsAn international registry of patients with suspected PVT undergoing two-dimensional/Doppler and TEE before thrombolysis was established. All TEE studies were reviewed and quantitated by a single observer blinded to all data.ResultsFrom 1985 to 2001, 107 patients (71 females; age 24 to 86 years) from 14 centers (6 in the U.S.) were identified. The majority of cases involved the mitral valve (79 mitral, 13 aortic, and 15 tricuspid). Hemodynamic success rate was achieved in 85% and was similar across valves. Overall complications were observed in 17.8%, and death in 5.6%. Predictors of complications were: New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, presence of shock, sinus tachycardia, hypotension, previous history of stroke, thrombus extension beyond the valve ring, and thrombus area. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that two variables were independent predictors of complications: thrombus area by TEE (odds ratio [OR] 2.41 per 1 cm2increment, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12 to 5.19) and prior history of stroke (OR 4.55, 95% CI 1.35 to 15.38). A thrombus area

A 44-year-old Hispanic man underwent a routine cardiac evaluation for kidney transplantation. He had a history of polycystic kidney disease and had been receiving hemodialysis for 2 years. A 2-dimensional echocardiogram revealed large trabeculations and deep recesses in the endocardial wall of both ventricles (Movie I; see Data Supplement). Cardiac …