Search

Dry eyes is one of the most common complications after laser vision correction. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a flapless procedure with a smaller corneal incision, less corneal nerves are transected during, making it theoretically less prone to dry eyes. Both SMILE and femtosecond-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) induce a transient worsening in dry eye parameters, but there is evidence showing that SMILE holds promises to have fewer negative impacts on the ocular surface parameters and allow an earlier recovery. SMILE-treated eyes may also have shown less corneal denervation and better corneal sensitivity compared with FS-LASIK eyes. This review summarizes the mechanisms of dry eyes after laser vision correction, the short-term (≤6 months) and long-term (>6 months) results in changes to dry eyes signs and symptoms, and corneal sensitivity of SMILE, as compared with FS-LASIK. Limitation of the studies and reasons accounting for their discrepancies will be discussed. Future randomized controlled trials with standardized postoperative regime are needed for better evaluation of dry eyes after SMILE.

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) was introduced in the recent decade for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. This flap-free technique has a high efficacy and safety profile and also carries potential advantages over laser in situ keratomileusis such as a better corneal biomechanical stability, reduction in dry eyes rate, and the avoidance of flap complications. However, there have been concerns regarding the precision of astigmatism correction that undercorrection has been reported to be apparent. Various factors that affect astigmatism correction have been identified in the literature. The purpose of this review is to discuss the factors that affect astigmatism correction in SMILE and several techniques to improve the refractive outcomes.

Background: Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is the most common refractive surgery in young patients, which aims at providing a clear distance vision without the use of spectacles. With time, these patients develop symptomatic cataract, which affects activities of daily living, and to improve visual acuity, intraocular lens (IOL) implantation can be considered. In post-myopic LASIK patients, to allow continuation of spectacle independence, the implantation of presbyopia-correcting IOLs is a suitable option. The purpose of this retrospective case series is to report the visual outcome and quality in post-myopic LASIK eyes after the implantation of AT LISA tri839MP IOL., Method: Twenty eyes of 13 patients with history of myopic LASIK within 20 years underwent phacoemulsification by one single surgeon. All eyes were implanted with AT LISA tri839PMP IOL, and their outcomes were evaluated at 6 months postoperation., Results: The mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (VA) is 0.28 ± 0.29, while the corrected distance VA is 0.06 ± 0.14. The mean postoperative uncorrected near VA is 0.02 ± 0.05, while the corrected near VA is 0.01 ± 0.02. The mean postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (SE) is - 0.92 ± 0.76D. There is a statistically significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative refraction (p = 0.02), which shows a postoperative myopic shift. There is also a statistically significant difference between the mean targeted SE and postoperative manifest refraction SE (p = 0.00). Only one out of 20 eyes (5%) reported halo and glare symptoms. Ten out of 20 eyes (50%) are able to achieve spectacles independence., Conclusion: In conclusion, in post-myopic LASIK eyes, AT LISA tri839MP provides a good visual outcome at both near and distance, but is more predictable at near than at distance. There is a myopic shift in the postoperative SE. Visual quality is satisfactory and has not been exacerbated. Most patients can remain to be spectacles free at all distances.

Purpose: To determine the association between anterior corneal curvature and optical zone centration as well as its impact on aberration profiles in small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)., Methods: Seventy-eight eyes of 78 patients treated with SMILE (45 eyes) and LASIK (33 eyes) were included. The centration of the optical zone was evaluated on the instantaneous curvature difference map between the preoperative and 3-month postoperative scans using a superimposed set of concentric circles. The correlation between optical zone decentration and anterior keratometry values was evaluated. The effect of optical zone decentration on vector components of astigmatic correction and induction of higher-order aberrations (HOA) was assessed., Results: The mean decentration distance was 0.21 ± 0.11 mm for SMILE and 0.20 ± 0.09 mm for LASIK (p = 0.808). There was a significant correlation between anterior keratometric astigmatism and decentration distance (r = 0.653, p < 0.001) for SMILE but not for LASIK (r = - 0.264, p = 0.138). Astigmatic correction was performed in 67 eyes. Optical zone decentration and the vector components of astigmatic correction were not correlated (p ≥ 0.420). Significant correlation was demonstrated between the decentration distance and the induced total coma (SMILE: r = 0.384, p = 0.009; LASIK: r = 0.553, p = 0.001) as well as the induced total HOA (SMILE: r = 0.498, p = 0.001; LASIK: r = 0.555, p = 0.001)., Conclusion: Anterior cornea astigmatism affected the treatment centration in SMILE but not LASIK. Subclinical decentration was associated with the induction of total coma and total HOA, but it did not affect the lower-order astigmatic correction.

Objectives: To compare the various Pentacam-measured K-readings with the clinical history method (CHM) in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)., Methods: In this prospective study, Pentacam examination was performed in 71 eyes 1 month after myopic LASIK. The true net power (TNP) 4 mm, total corneal refractive power (TCRP) 4 mm, equivalent K-reading (EKR) 4.0 mm, and EKR 4.5 mm obtained from the same scan were compared with the K derived from CHM., Results: The average baseline spherical equivalence was -5.44±2.38 D. After LASIK, the mean KCHM was 37.67±2.13 D, TCRP4mm was 37.14±1.79 D, TNP4mm was 36.88±1.76 D, EKR4.0mm was 37.58±1.94 D, and EKR4.5mm was 37.51±1.94 D. TCRP4mm, TNP4mm, and EKR4.5mm showed a statistically significant deviation from the KCHM, with the mean error being 0.53 D, 0.79 D, and 0.16 D, respectively (P<0.05). Only the EKR4.0mm showed no statistically significant difference from the KCHM (mean error 0.09 D, P=0.23). The EKR4.0mm also had the narrowest 95% limits of agreement (LoA) (-1.10 to +1.28 D), whereas both TCRP4mm and TNP4mm had a wider LoA (-0.88 to +1.95 D and -0.62 to +2.20 D, respectively). All four Pentacam K-readings had a strong and statistically significant correlation with the KCHM., Conclusions: Using the CHM as reference, the EKR4.0mm demonstrated the closest agreement when compared with the EKR4.5mm, TNP4mm, and TCRP4mm obtained from the same scan.

Purpose: To compare the astigmatic correction in high myopic astigmatism between small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using vector analysis., Setting: Hong Kong Laser Eye Center, Hong Kong., Design: Retrospective case series., Methods: Patients who had correction of myopic astigmatism of 3.0 diopters (D) or more and had either small-incision lenticule extraction or femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK were included. Only the left eye was included for analysis. Visual and refractive results were presented and compared between groups., Results: The study comprised 105 patients (40 eyes in the small-incision lenticule extraction group and 65 eyes in the femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK group.) The mean preoperative manifest cylinder was -3.42 D ± 0.55 (SD) in the small-incision lenticule extraction group and -3.47 ± 0.49 D in the LASIK group (P = .655). At 3 months, there was no significant between-group difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity (P = .915) and manifest spherical equivalent (P = .145). Ninety percent and 95.4% of eyes were within ± 0.5 D of the attempted cylindrical correction for the small-incision lenticule extraction and LASIK group, respectively (P = .423). Vector analysis showed comparable target-induced astigmatism (P = .709), surgically induced astigmatism vector (P = .449), difference vector (P = .335), and magnitude of error (P = .413) between groups. The absolute angle of error was 1.88 ± 2.25 degrees in the small-incision lenticule extraction group and 1.37 ± 1.58 degrees in the LASIK group (P = .217)., Conclusion: Small-incision lenticule extraction offered astigmatic correction comparable to LASIK in eyes with high myopic astigmatism., (Copyright © 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is safe and effective laser refractive procedures in treating refractive errors. However, regression of treatment and iatrogenic keratectasia remain to be a major concern, especially in treating thin cornea with high ametropia. Collagen cross-linking (CXL) is an effective method in stopping keratoconus progression through increasing the biomechanical strength of the cornea. Adjuvant cross-linking to refractive procedures can theoretically help prevent regression and reduce the risk of keratectasia development by increasing the mechanical stability of cornea. During the procedure, riboflavin is directly applied to the corneal stroma, thereby reducing the need of de-epithelialization as in the conventional protocol for keratoconus. Currently, there is still no consensus regarding the indication of CXL during refractive procedure, nor any standardized treatment protocol. This article aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the use of adjuvant CXL in LASIK., (© 2016 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To longitudinally compare the visual and refractive outcomes and changes in corneal thickness between femtosecond-assisted sub-Bowmen keratomileusis (SBK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with mitomycin C in eyes with high myopia., Methods: Patients with spherical equivalent ≥6 dioptres (D) who underwent femtosecond-assisted SBK or PRK with mitomycin C were recruited. All patients were examined preoperatively and after 1 week, and, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Assessments included uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity , and manifest refraction spherical equivalent. Corneal thickness was measured using swept source optical coherence tomography., Results: A total of 110 eyes were included (68 PRK, 42 SBK). Change in efficacy index and safety index was not significantly different between both groups beyond 1 week postoperatively (p≥0.116). Manifest refraction spherical equivalent changed significantly from -9.02±1.92 D preoperatively to -0.21±0.31 D and from -8.25±1.10 D preoperatively to -0.53±0.55 D at 1 year after PRK and SBK, respectively (p<0.0001). The variance of postoperative refraction was significantly smaller after PRK throughout the 1-year follow-up compared with SBK (p≤0.0024). The central corneal thickness stabilised at 1 week after PRK and 3 months after SBK., Conclusions: Our study showed that femtosecond-assisted SBK and PRK with mitomycin C have comparable safety and efficacy for correction of high myopia. However, better predictability of postoperative refraction was noted after PRK compared with SBK., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)

Purpose: To study the differences in early corneal cellular events and biomechanical properties after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK performed using conventional or inverted side-cut angles., Methods: In the laboratory study, left eyes of 24 rabbits underwent LASIK flap creation with a 70° or 115° side-cut. The contralateral eyes served as controls. The corneas were harvested 24 hours postoperatively. In the clinical study, 2 eyes of each patient (n = 29) were randomized to corneal flap creation with 70° or 115° side-cut angles during LASIK. The Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY) was used to assess biomechanical properties of the cornea., Results: In rabbit eyes, epithelial ingrowth was observed more frequently in flaps with 70° side cuts compared to flaps with 115° side-cuts. Corneas with 70° side-cuts showed significantly increased apoptotic cells compared to 115° side-cuts in the central (P = .001) and peripheral (P = .004) regions. Fifty-eight eyes of 29 patients were included in the clinical study. An overall reduction in Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure, corneal-compensated intraocular pressure, corneal resistance factor, corneal hysteresis measurements, p1 area, p2 area, and p1 area 1 and p2 area 1 was noted 37 ± 2 months after surgery (P < .001). No significant difference was observed in the change of any of these parameters between both groups (P ≥ .146)., Conclusions: Significant differences in wound healing were observed in rabbit corneas that underwent LASIK with conventional or inverted side-cuts. Variation in flap side-cut angles did not alter the long-term biomechanical properties measured with the ORA in patients after LASIK. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(2):96-103.]., (Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.)

Purpose: To compare the demarcation line depth after 2 different protocols of simultaneous laser in situ keratomileusis and collagen crosslinking (LASIK Xtra)., Methods: Twenty-three patients receiving bilateral LASIK Xtra were included in this comparative interventional study. The corneal stroma was soaked with 0.22% riboflavin for 90 seconds before flap repositioning. One eye was then randomized to receive either 18 mW/cm of ultraviolet A irradiation for 120 seconds or for 180 seconds, whereas the fellow eye received the other irradiation duration. The demarcation line on anterior-segment optical coherence tomography and grading of corneal haze on slit lamp were compared at postoperative month 1., Results: The average age was 29.0 ± 8.2 years. There was no statistical difference in preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (P > 0.05). At postoperative 1 month, a well-defined demarcation line was visible in 74% and 70% in the 2- and 3-minute groups, respectively. The demarcation line depth was 282 ± 51 μm and 284 ± 43 μm, respectively (P = 1), and the ratio of the demarcation line depth to the postoperative central corneal thickness was 0.69 ± 0.13 and 0.72 ± 0.10 (P = 0.61). There was no difference in the percentage of eyes with grade 1 or 2 corneal haze (P = 0.76)., Conclusions: The depth of the demarcation line was the same after receiving 18-mW/cm irradiation for either 2 or 3 minutes. The amount of early postoperative corneal haze was also similar. We postulate that there was lack of oxygen in the corneal tissue to fuel the photochemical reaction despite given additional time.

Purpose: To present the 1-year outcomes of combining monocular bi-aspheric ablation profile and contralateral monofocal LASIK in hyperopic patients with presbyopia., Methods: In this retrospective case series, 36 consecutive patients (72 eyes) who underwent simultaneous bi-aspheric ablation (PresbyMAX: SCHWIND Eye-Tech-Solutions GmbH and Co KG, Kleinostheim, Germany) in the non-dominant eye and monofocal regular LASIK in the dominant eye for correction of hyperopia and presbyopia were reviewed for 1 year. Binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), near (UNVA), corrected distance (CDVA), and distance corrected near (DCNVA) visual acuity and manifest refraction were analyzed postoperatively., Results: At 1 year, the mean binocular UDVA improved significantly from 0.26 ± 0.25 to 0.039 ± 0.088 logMAR (P < .001). Binocular UNVA also improved from 0.73 ± 0.30 to 0.10 ± 0.22 logRAD (P < .001). Eighty-seven percent of patients achieved UDVA of 20/25 or better and 90% had UNVA of J3 or better. Simultaneous binocular distance and near vision of 20/25 and J2 or better was achieved in 70%. Only 17% of patients had a binocular DCNVA of J2 or better. No patient suffered from a loss of 2 lines of CDVA. Refractive stability was achieved for both eyes from 1 month postoperatively. The re-treatment rate was 14% for improvement of near vision within 6 months to 1 year., Conclusions: Presbyopic correction using monocular PresbyMAX combined with monofocal regular LASIK in the fellow eye is safe and acceptable in hyperopic patients. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(1):37-43.]., (Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.)

Purpose: To analyze the visual and refractive outcomes of LASIK with and without simultaneous cross-linking for correction of myopia., Methods: Patients who received femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK with and without adjunctive cross-linking according to patient's preference were examined longitudinally for 6 months. Patients with myopic manifest refraction spherical equivalent of 5.00 diopters (D) or greater and estimated residual stromal thickness of greater than 250 µm were included., Results: Overall, 120 eyes of 60 patients were included (60 eyes of 30 patients for LASIK with cross-linking; 60 eyes of 30 patients with LASIK only). No significant difference was observed in age, preoperative corrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, manifest sphere and cylinder, minimal corneal thickness, and residual stromal bed thickness between both groups (P ≥ .245). The uncorrected distance visual acuity and efficacy index were significantly worse on day 1 in eyes receiving adjunctive cross-linking (P = .0001). At 6 months, 86.7% and 95% of the eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better in LASIK with cross-linking and LASIK only, respectively. The variance of postoperative spherical equivalent and sphere was significantly higher in eyes undergoing LASIK with cross-linking from 1 week up to 6 months compared to LASIK only (P ≤ .002). None of the patients required re-treatment up to 6 months postoperatively., Conclusions: Adjunctive cross-linking during LASIK was associated with worse visual outcomes during the first postoperative week. The variance of spherical equivalent was also high in these patients over a 6-month follow-up. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(10):664-670.]., (Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.)

Aim: To evaluate the performance of a point-of-care test for detection of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) levels in post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) dry eyes., Methods: A comparative study between patients with mild to moderate post-LASIK dry eyes and age-matched normal subjects was conducted. Ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear break-up time (TBUT), and tear film MMP-9 and total protein levels were compared between the two groups. A point-of-care test device (RPS InflammaDry, Sarasota, Florida, USA) was utilised to confirm elevated MMP-9 levels in tear film., Results: Fourteen post-LASIK dry eyes and 34 normal eyes were included. There was no significant difference in age and gender between both groups (p>0.175). The OSDI was significantly higher (25.5±7.7 vs 7.4±2.5; p<0.001) and TBUT levels were significantly lower (5.4±0.9 vs 13.5±2.3; p<0.001) in patients with dry eye compared with normal subjects. The tear film MMP-9 levels were 52.7±32.5 ng/mL in dry eyes and 4.1±2.1 ng/mL in normal eyes (p<0.001). MMP-9 levels were >40 ng/mL in 7/14 (50.0%) post-LASIK dry eyes. The InflammaDry was positive in 8/14 (57.1%) post-LASIK eyes. All positive cases had tear film MMP-9 levels ≥38.03 ng/mL. Agreement between InflammaDry and MMP-9 was excellent with Cohen κ value of 0.857 in post-LASIK dry eyes., Conclusions: Only half of post-LASIK dry eyes were found to have significant inflammation associated with elevated MMP-9. The OSDI is useful to non-specifically identify patients with symptomatic dry eye while the InflammaDry determined which patients with dry eye were associated with significant inflammation that may guide therapeutic management decisions., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/)

Swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the latest advancement in anterior segment imaging. There are limited data regarding its performance after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). We compared the reliability of swept-source OCT and Scheimpflug imaging for evaluation of corneal parameters in refractive surgery candidates with myopia or myopic astigmatism. Three consecutive measurements were obtained preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively using swept-source OCT and Scheimpflug imaging. The study parameters included central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), keratometry at steep (Ks) and flat (Kf) axes, mean keratometry (Km), and, anterior and posterior best fit spheres (Ant and Post BFS). The main outcome measures included reliability of measurements before and after LASIK was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and reproducibility coefficients (RC). Association between the mean value of corneal parameters with age, spherical equivalent (SEQ), and residual bed thickness (RBT) and association of variance heterogeneity of corneal parameters and these covariates were analyzed. Twenty-six right eyes of 26 participants (mean age, 32.7 ± 6.9 yrs; mean SEQ, -6.27 ± 1.67 D) were included. Preoperatively, swept-source OCT demonstrated significantly higher ICC for Ks, CCT, TCT, and Post BFS (P ≤ 0.016), compared with Scheimpflug imaging. Swept-source OCT demonstrated significantly smaller RC values for CCT, TCT, and Post BFS (P ≤ 0.001). After LASIK, both devices had significant differences in measurements for all corneal parameters (P ≤ 0.015). Swept-source OCT demonstrated a significantly higher ICC and smaller RC for all measurements, compared with Scheimpflug imaging (P ≤ 0.001). Association of variance heterogeneity was only found in pre-LASIK Ant BFS and post-LASIK Post BFS for swept-source OCT, whereas significant association of variance heterogeneity was noted for all measurements except Ks and Km for Scheimpflug imaging.This study reported higher reliability of swept-source OCT for post-LASIK corneal measurements, as compared with Scheimpflug imaging. The reliability of corneal parameters measured with Scheimpflug imaging after LASIK was not consistent across different age, SEQ, and RBT measurements. These factors need to be considered during follow-up and evaluation of post-LASIK patients for further surgical procedures.

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of sub-Bowman keratomileusis (100-μm flap) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (120-μm flap) using 150-kHz femtosecond laser., Design: Randomized, double-masked, contralateral clinical trial., Methods: One hundred patients (200 eyes) with myopia or myopic astigmatism were included. Postoperative examinations were performed at week 1 and months 1, 3, 6, and 12. Main outcome measures included postoperative uncorrected (UCVA) and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA); manifest refraction spherical equivalent; efficacy and safety indices; corneal thickness; and complications., Results: The mean age of patients was 33.9 ± 7.9 years. Overall, the preoperative UCVA, BCVA, and manifest refraction spherical equivalent were 1.349 ± 0.332, -0.022 ± 0.033, and -5.81 ± 1.61 diopters, respectively. No significant difference was observed in preoperative (P ≥ .226) or intraoperative parameters (P ≥ .452) between both groups, except residual stromal thickness (P < .001). The UCVA, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, and central corneal thickness stabilized by 1 week, while the thinnest corneal thickness stabilized by 3 months postoperatively. There was no significant difference between both groups for any parameter during all follow-up visits (P ≥ .132) except the 3-month safety index, which was better in the sub-Bowman keratomileusis group (P = .007). Soft opaque bubble layer was noted intraoperatively in 12 cases (7, 100-μm group; 5, 120-μm group; P = .577). No postoperative complications were observed., Conclusions: Our study did not find any differences in the visual and refractive outcomes between femtosecond-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis and LASIK. Both surgeries resulted in quick visual recovery as early as 1 week postoperatively., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the change in posterior corneal elevation up to 1 year after myopic femtosecond-assisted LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)., Design: Prospective, longitudinal, comparative study., Participants: Patients undergoing femtosecond-assisted LASIK or PRK., Methods: Corneal imaging was performed using swept-source optical coherence tomography at baseline and at each postoperative follow-up. A 2-way analysis of variance model with repeated measures and a linear mixed effect model were used to compare the differences in posterior corneal elevation between LASIK and PRK at different points after adjusting for the preoperative spherical equivalent (SEQ), central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), residual bed thickness (RST), and ablation depth (AD)., Main Outcome Measures: The changes in posterior corneal elevation 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery., Results: Ninety-eight eyes of 49 patients (mean age 35.2 ± 8.5 years) (62 LASIK, 36 PRK) were included. The mean change in posterior corneal elevation values after LASIK and PRK were 4.88±0.47 μm versus 3.67±0.48 μm (B-1), 2.42±0.56 μm versus 3.00±0.47 μm (B-3), 3.76±0.46 μm versus 2.76±0.46 μm (B-6), and 2.92±0.46 μm versus 2.72±0.46 μm (B-12), respectively. Significant differences in posterior corneal elevation after LASIK were found from month 1, to month 3, to month 6, to month 12 (P ≤ 0.001), whereas posterior corneal elevation did not change significantly from month 3, to month 6, to month 12 (P ≥ 0.373) after PRK. LASIK and PRK eyes showed significant differences at months 3 and 12 (P ≤ 0.023). A similar pattern was observed for the changes in posterior corneal elevation after LASIK and PRK after adjusting for the effect of SEQ, CCT, TCT, RST, and AD. The adjusted forward displacements of the posterior corneal surface were statistically significant throughout the study period after both refractive surgeries (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: The findings of our study suggested that there was a mild but significant forward protrusion of the posterior cornea after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK and PRK. The posterior cornea fluctuated during the first postoperative year after LASIK, whereas it stabilized as early as 3 months after PRK., (Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)