Search

Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors (CNFETs) are highly promising to improve the energy efficiency of digital logic circuits. Here, we quantify the Very-Large-Scale Integrated (VLSI) circuit-level energy efficiency of CNFETs versus advanced technology options (ATOs) currently under consideration [e.g., silicon-germanium (SiGe) channels and progressing from today's FinFETs to gate-all-around nanowires/nanosheets]. We use industry-practice physical designs of digital VLSI processor cores in future technology nodes with millions of transistors (including effects from parasitics and interconnect wires) and technology parameters extracted from experimental data. Our analysis shows that CNFETs are projected to offer 9× energy-delay product (EDP) benefit (∼3× faster while simultaneously consuming ∼3× less energy) compared to Si/SiGe FinFET. The ATOs provide <50% EDP benefits. All analyses are performed at the same off-state leakage current density (≤100 nA per micron of FET width) and power density (≤100 W/cm2of chip area). This analysis provides insights into the sources of CNFET EDP benefits and addresses key questions for deeply-scaled technologies. For instance, while contact resistance is a concern for sub-10 nm nodes, CNFETs still provide up to 6.0× EDP benefit (versus Si/SiGe FinFETs) using CNFET contact resistance values already experimentally achieved for 9 nm contact length. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, lateral gate-all-around nano-sheet transistors (NSH-FETs) are explored from intrinsic performance to dc and ring oscillator (RO) benchmark compared with FinFETs and nanowire transistors (NW-FETs) for sub-7-nm node. The band structure calculated technology computer aided design results show comparable intrinsic performance to FinFETs at same channel cross section. On top of that, dc and RO are evaluated by taking into account electrostatics, parasitic components, and layout configurations. The NSH-FETs show an advantage in drive current with the NSH width but their RO performance is limited by the device capacitance. The multiple narrow NSH-FET shows ~5% higher drive current compared to the NW-FET at similar subthreshold swing, allowing heavier capacitive loaded circuit. In addition, NSH-FETs can provide the device design freedom from aggressive fin pitch scaling. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

For sub-7-nm technology nodes, the gate-all-around (GAA) nanowire-based device structure is a strong candidate to sustain scaling according to Moore’s Law. For the first time, the performance of two GAA device options—lateral FET (LFET) and vertical FET (VFET)—is benchmarked and analyzed at the system level using an ARM core processor, based on realistic compact device models at the 5-nm technology node. Tradeoffs among energy, frequency, leakage, and area are evaluated by a multi- Vth optimization flow. A variety of relevant device configurations, including various number of fins, nanowires, and nanowire stacks, are explored. The results demonstrate that an LFET GAA core has a larger maximum frequency than its VFET counterpart because the channel stress that can be created in the LFETs results in a larger ON current. For fast timing targets, the LFET cores are therefore superior. However, for slow timing targets (e.g., 5 ns), the VFET cores with three nanowires offer a 7% area reduction and a 20% energy saving compared with the LFET cores with 2fin/2stack at the same leakage power. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

For the first time, we present complete device threshold voltage (VT)-targeting methodology for FinFET SRAM in 10-nm technology, considering capacitance due to metal pattering and device variability to set target read current for different variants of SRAM architecture to determine technology high-density (HD) SRAM cell. The VT-targeting methodology brings into play the worst case read and write margins available for SRAM cell to determine nominal device VT by tuning the work function of metal gate. Analysis shows that for minimum leakage current, 112 SRAM cell is optimum, whereas for the same area of 0.0546~\mu \mathrm{m}^{\mathrm {2}} with 50% higher leakage, 122 SRAM outperform by 5% and 20% improved read and write margins, respectively. The 122 SRAM as HD cell reduces the cost of the technology by sharing P-channel field effect transistor (PFET) and N-channel field effect transistor (NFET) VT mask with the high threshold voltage logic devices, whereas the 112 SRAM device shares only NFET VT mask. The 111 SRAM can achieve target performance at lesser area of 0.048~\mu \mathrmm^\mathrm 2 by compromising read stability, which will result in lower yield. At 64-nm pitch, litho-etch litho-etch (LELE) double-patterned gate impacts device performance and alleviates variability; hence the read margin of SRAM cell should consider an additional 1\sigma \mathrm {\mathbf {rsnm}} margin to retain the same yield in 10-nm-technology era. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, we compare the performances of FinFETs, lateral gate-all-around (GAA) FETs, and vertical GAAFETs (VFETs) at 7-nm node dimensions and beyond. Comparison is done at ring oscillator level accounting not only for front-end of line devices but also for interconnects. It is demonstrated that FinFETs fail to maintain the performance at scaled dimensions, while VFETs demonstrate good scalability and eventually outperform lateral devices both in speed and power consumption. Lateral GAAFETs show better scalability with respect to FinFETs but still consume 35% more energy per switch than VFETs if made under 5-nm node design rules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]