Search

Anlotinib is an antiangiogenic drug that shows good efficacy and safety in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for consolidation therapy in patients with stage III locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). This was a randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial of patients with unresectable/nonoperated NSCLC treated with cCRT. The participants were randomized 2:1 to the anlotinib or control group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival. This study was terminated early due to poor recruitment. Nine and two participants were randomly assigned to the anlotinib and control groups, respectively. One participant in the control group was excluded due to taking prohibited medications before the first efficacy evaluation. In the anlotinib group, the median age was 63 (range, 37-74) years. Two participants achieved partial response, six stable disease, and one progressive disease as best response. The DCR was 88.9%. The median PFS was 11.5 months, and the 12-month PFS rate was 33.9%. All related adverse events were grade 1 or 2. Two participants had a dose adjustment during the study. The evaluable data suggest that anlotinib alone was effective and tolerable in consolidation therapy after cCRT in patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC. The results need to be confirmed by a large-sample trial. This clinical trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03743129). Registration date: 6 September 2018., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the clinical impact of plan complexity on the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)., Methods: Data from 123 treatment plans for 113 NSCLC patients were analyzed. Plan-averaged beam modulation (PM), plan beam irregularity (PI), monitor unit/Gy (MU/Gy) and spherical disproportion (SD) were calculated. The γ passing rates (GPR) were measured using ArcCHECK 3D phantom with 2 %/2mm criteria. High complexity (HC) and low complexity (LC) groups were statistically stratified based on the aforementioned metrics, using cutoffs determined by their significance in correlation with survival time, as calculated using the R-3.6.1 packages. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and Random Survival Forest (RSF) models were employed for the analysis of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Propensity-score-matched pairs were generated to minimize bias in the analysis., Results: The median follow-up time for all patients was 25.5 months (interquartile range 13.4-41.2). The prognostic capacity of PM was suggested using RSF, based on Variable Importance and Minimal Depth methods. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year LRFS rates in the HC group were significantly lower than those in the LC group (p = 0.023), when plan complexity was defined by PM. However, no significant difference was observed between the HC and LC groups when defined by other metrics (p > 0.05). All γ passing rates exceeded 90.5 %., Conclusions: This study revealed a significant association between higher PM and worse LRFS in NSCLC patients treated with SBRT. This finding offers additional clinical evidence supporting the potential optimization of pre-treatment quality assurance protocols., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immunotherapy has made significant advances in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but data in combination with radiotherapy are scarce. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC., Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed patients with ES-SCLC who received standard platinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with atezolizumab or durvalumab immunotherapy as induction treatment, followed by consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (CTRT) before disease progression in the first-line setting. Adverse events during radiotherapy with or without maintenance immunotherapy and survival outcomes were assessed., Results: Between December 2019 and November 2021, 36 patients with ES-SCLC were identified to have received such treatment modality at one hospital. The number of metastatic sites at diagnosis was 1-4. The biological effective dose of CTRT ranged from 52 to 113 Gy. Only two patients (6%) developed grade 3 toxic effect of thrombocytopenia, but none experienced grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Four patients developed immune-related pneumonitis during the induction treatment period but successfully completed later CTRT. The rate of radiation-related pneumonitis was 8% with grades 1-2 and well tolerated. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months, but the median overall survival (OS) was not determined. The estimated 1-year OS was 80.2% and 1-year PFS was 53.4%., Conclusions: Immunotherapy combined with CTRT for ES-SCLC is safe and has ample survival benefit., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Anatomical changes occurred during the treatment course of radiation therapy for lung cancer patients may introduce clinically unacceptable dosimetric deviations from the planned dose. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) can compensate these dosimetric deviations in subsequent treatments via plan adaption. Determining whether and when to trigger plan adaption during the treatment course is essential to the effectiveness and efficiency of ART. In this study, we aimed to develop a prediction model as an auxiliary decision-making tool for lung ART to identify the patients with intrathoracic anatomical changes that would potentially benefit from the plan adaptions during the treatment course., Methods: Seventy-one pairs of weekly cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT) and planning CT (pCT) from 17 advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients were enrolled in this study. To assess the dosimetric impacts brought by anatomical changes observed on each CBCT, dose distribution of the original treatment plan on the CBCT anatomy was calculated on a virtual CT generated by deforming the corresponding pCT to the CBCT and compared to that of the original plan. A replan was deemed needed for the CBCT anatomy once the recalculated dose distribution violated our dosimetric-based trigger criteria. A three-dimensional region of significant anatomical changes (region of interest, ROI) between each CBCT and the corresponding pCT was identified, and 16 morphological features of the ROI were extracted. Additionally, eight features from the overlapped volume histograms (OVHs) of patient anatomy were extracted for each patient to characterize the patient-specific anatomy. Based on the 24 extracted features and the evaluated replanning needs of the pCT-CBCT pairs, a nonlinear supporting vector machine was used to build a prediction model to identify the anatomical changes on CBCTs that would trigger plan adaptions. The most relevant features were selected using the sequential backward selection (SBS) algorithm and a shuffling-and-splitting validation scheme was used for model evaluation., Results: Fifty-five CBCT-pCT pairs were identified of having an ROI, among which 21 CBCT anatomies required plan adaptions. For these 21 positive cases, statistically significant improvements in the sparing of lung, esophagus and spinal cord were achieved by plan adaptions. A high model performance of 0.929 AUC (area under curve) and 0.851 accuracy was achieved with six selected features, including five ROI shape features and one OVH feature. Without involving the OVH features in the feature selection process, the mean AUC and accuracy of the model significantly decreased to 0.826 and 0.779, respectively. Further investigation showed that poor prediction performance with AUC of 0.76 was achieved by the univariate model in solving this binary classification task., Conclusion: We built a prediction model based on the features of patient anatomy and the anatomical changes captured by on-treatment CBCT imaging to trigger plan adaption for lung cancer patients. This model effectively associated the anatomical changes with the dosimetric impacts for lung ART. This model can be a promising tool to assist the clinicians in making decisions for plan adaptions during the treatment courses., (© 2022 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background: A substantial proportion of patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cannot either tolerate or access concurrent chemoradiotherapy, so sequential chemoradiotherapy is commonly used. We assessed the efficacy and safety of sugemalimab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, in patients with stage III NSCLC whose disease had not progressed after concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy., Methods: GEMSTONE-301 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, stage III NSCLC, done at 50 hospitals or academic research centres in China. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 who had not progressed after concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy. We randomly assigned patients (2:1, using an interactive voice-web response system) to receive sugemalimab 1200 mg or matching placebo, intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 24 months. Stratification factors were ECOG performance status, previous chemoradiotherapy, and total radiotherapy dose. The investigators, trial coordination staff, patients, and study sponsor were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of assigned study treatment. The study has completed enrolment and the results of a preplanned analysis of the primary endpoint are reported here. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03728556., Findings: Between Aug 30, 2018 and Dec 30, 2020, we screened 564 patients of whom 381 were eligible. Study treatment was received by all patients randomly assigned to sugemalimab (n=255) and to placebo (n=126). At data cutoff (March 8, 2021), median follow-up was 14·3 months (IQR 6·4-19·4) for patients in the sugemalimab group and 13·7 months (7·1-18·4) for patients in the placebo group. Progression-free survival assessed by BICR was significantly longer with sugemalimab than with placebo (median 9·0 months [95% CI 8·1-14·1] vs 5·8 months [95% CI 4·2-6·6]; stratified hazard ratio 0·64 [95% CI 0·48-0·85], p=0·0026). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22 (9%) of 255 patients in the sugemalimab group versus seven (6%) of 126 patients in the placebo group, the most common being pneumonitis or immune-mediated pneumonitis (seven [3%] of 255 patients in the sugemalimab group vs one [<1%] of 126 in the placebo group). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 38 (15%) patients in the sugemalimab group and 12 (10%) in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths were reported in four (2%) of 255 patients (pneumonia in two patients, pneumonia with immune-mediated pneumonitis in one patient, and acute hepatic failure in one patient) in the sugemalimab group and none in the placebo group., Interpretation: Sugemalimab after definitive concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy could be an effective consolidation therapy for patients with stage III NSCLC whose disease has not progressed after sequential or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm this conclusion., Funding: CStone Pharmaceuticals and the National Key Research and Development Program of China., Translation: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Y-LW reports advisory services for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Takeda; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Beigene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Hengrui, and Roche, outside of the submitted work. QZ reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. NC, JW, QW, RZ, and JY are employed by CStone Pharmaceuticals and NC, JW, QW, and JY declare stock ownership in the company. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is no consensus on the therapeutic approach to ECOG 2 patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), despite the sizable percentage of these patients in clinical practice. This study focused on the efficacy, toxicity and the optimal chemotherapy regimen of CCRT in ECOG 2 patients in a phase III trial., Methods: Patients capable of all self-care with bed rest for less than 50% of daytime were classified as ECOG 2 subgroup. A subgroup analysis was performed for ECOG 2 patients recruited in the phase III trial receiving concurrent EP (etoposide + cisplatin)/PC (paclitaxel + carboplatin) chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy (3D-CRT)., Results: A total of 71 ECOG 2 patients were enrolled into the study. Forty-six (64.8%) patients were treated with IMRT technique. The median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) for ECOG 2 patients were 16.4 months and 9 months, respectively. No difference was observed in treatment compliance and toxicities between ECOG 2 patients and ECOG 0-1 patients. Within the ECOG 2 group (31 in the EP arm and 40 in the PC arm), median OS and 3-year OS were 15.7 months and 37.5% for the EP arm, and 16.8 months and 7.5% for the PC arm, respectively (p = 0.243). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis was higher in the PC arm (17.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.014) with 5 radiation pneumonitis related deaths, while the incidence of grade 3 esophagitis was numerically higher in the EP arm (25.8% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.078)., Conclusions: CCRT provided ECOG 2 patients promising outcome with acceptable toxicities. EP might be superior to PC in terms of safety profile in the setting of CCRT for ECOG 2 patients. Prospective randomized studies based on IMRT technique are warranted to validate our findings., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01494558. (Registered 19 December 2011).

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard care for inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of our study was to investigate whether a prediction model based on cone-beam CT (CBCT) plus pretreatment CT radiomics features could improve the prediction of tumor control and lung toxicity after SBRT in comparison to a model based on pretreatment CT radiomics features alone., Methods: A total of 34 cases of stage I NSCLC patients who received SBRT were included in the study. The pretreatment planning CT and serial CBCT radiomics features were analyzed using the imaging biomarker explorer (IBEX) software platform. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted for the association between progression-free survival (PFS), lung toxicity and features. The predictive capabilities of the models based on CBCT and CT features were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves., Results: Five CBCT features and two planning CT features were correlated with disease progression. Six CBCT features and two planning CT features were related to lung injury. The ROC curves indicated that the model based on the CBCT plus planning CT features might be better than the model based on the planning CT features in predicting lung injury. The other ROC curves indicated that the model based on the planning CT features was similar to the model based on the CBCT plus planning CT features in predicting disease progression., Conclusions: Both pretreatment CT and CBCT radiomics features could predict disease progression and lung injury. A model with CBCT plus pretreatment CT radiomics features might improve the prediction of lung toxicity in comparison with a model with pretreatment CT features alone., Key Points: Significant findings of the study: A model with cone-beam CT radiomics features plus pre-treatment CT radiomics features might improve the prediction of lung toxicity after SBRT in stage I NSCLC patients., What This Study Adds: In the prediction of PFS and lung toxicity in early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT, CBCT radiomics could be another effective method., (© 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: There is no consensus on the definition or recommended radiotherapy treatment of ultracentral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report our institution's experience in treating ultracentral lung cancer patients with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of 60 Gy in eight fractions., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 21 ultracentral NSCLC patients treated with 60 Gy SABR in eight fractions. We defined ultracentral lung cancer as the planning target volume (PTV) directly abutting or overlapping central structures, including the proximal bronchial tree, heart, and great vessels but not the esophagus. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC). Toxicity was scored per the CTCAE v4.03., Results: The median follow-up time was 15 months, and the median OS was 15 months. The one- and two-year OS rates were 87.5% and 76.6%, respectively. The one- and two-year PFS rates were 71.1% and 64.0%, respectively. The one- and two-year LC rates were 92.9% and 92.9%, respectively. The rate of grade 2 treatment-related toxicities was 19.1%. There was no grade ≥ 3 treatment-related toxicity., Conclusion: SABR of 60 Gy in eight fractions is feasible for ultracentral NSCLC., (© 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: The standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy, but the survival was not satisfied. With the development of intensity modulated radiotherapy, simultaneous integrated boost technique (SIB) becomes the research direction of locally advanced NSCLC. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of SIB intensity modulated radiotherapy technique for locally advanced NSCLC., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of locally advanced NSCLC who were treated with radiotherapy by SIB technique in Peking University Cancer Hospital from June 2015 to December 2018. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis., Results: Ninty-three patients were included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 34.23 months, 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local-recurrence free survival (LRFS) and metastasis free survival (MFS) rates were 53.0%, 37.0%, 50.5% and 50.5%, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥3 esophagitis was 5.4%. There were 2 (2.2%) patients experiencing grade ≥3 radiation-related pneumonia., Conclusions: Radiation with SIB intensity modulated radiotherapy technique is effective and safe for patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Purpose: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) represents an exciting, tolerable, and highly effective form of radiotherapy. Ongoing investigations into the interactions between radiotherapy and the immune system have uncovered new mechanisms that can be exploited to improve efficacy. We determined whether baseline or posttreatment immune parameters could predict disease control and toxicity in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with SABR., Patients and Methods: Peripheral blood samples were collected from 62 patients 24 hours before treatment and within 4 weeks after treatment for lymphocyte subset count analysis. All peripheral blood samples were analyzed by flow cytometry. Associated parameters were evaluated to determine their association with progression-free survival (PFS) and symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (grade 2 or higher). The survival rates were estimated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable analyses using binary logistic regression analysis or a Cox proportional hazards model., Results: At a median follow-up time of 36.0 months, the PFS rates for years 1, 2, and 3 were 91.0%, 82.5%, and 48.9%, respectively. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that only proportion of lung receiving 20 Gy of radiotherapy (odds ratio = 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.87; P = .023) and mean lung dose (odds ratio = 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-3.53; P = .016) were associated with symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (grade 2 or higher). Moreover, the immune parameters had no predictive value. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, an elevated posttreatment cytotoxic CD8 + T-cell level was an independent prognostic factor for longer PFS in stage I NSCLC (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.28; P = .01)., Conclusion: A higher posttreatment cytotoxic CD8 + T-cell level was predictive of better PFS in stage I NSCLC patients receiving SABR. Thus, enhancing tumor antigen-specific cellular immunity by combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy might be a crucial strategy for improving survival in these patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Twice-daily radiation concurrent with chemotherapy is one of the standard methods for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. The study was to evaluate the feasibility of chemotherapy concurrent with dose-escalating twice-daily radiotherapy by simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) approach in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer., Methods: Patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer were included, treated with twice-daily radiotherapy by SIB-IMRT concurrent with chemotherapy of etoposide plus cisplatin. Dose escalation was conducted by "classical" 3+3 methods with three patients enrolled in each dose level. The therapeutic gross tumor volume (GTV) was treated according to three consecutive dose levels i.e., 45 Gy at 1.5 Gy twice daily, 50 Gy at 1.67 Gy twice daily and 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy twice daily. The planning target volume (PTV) received a dose of 45 Gy delivered in 30 fractions of 1.5 Gy. The primary endpoints were acute toxicities. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and loco-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS) at 1-year of follow-up., Results: Twenty men and six women were included. The median age was 52 (30-68) months. 12 patients experienced grade 2 acute esophagitis, and 1 patient developed grade 3 acute esophagitis. Only 3 patients developed Grade 2 pneumonitis. Grade 3 or higher radiation-related pneumonia was not observed. None died of treatment-related causes. With median follow-up of 11.2 months (3.2-36.2 months), 1-year OS, PFS and LRFFS were 89.0%, 51.0% and 85.0%, respectively., Conclusions: Dose escalation for twice-daily radiation concurrent with chemotherapy in LS-SCLC has been safely achieved up to 54 Gy for GTV using SIB-IMRT technique.

Background: Concurrent twice-daily radiotherapy with chemotherapy of EP regimen is one of the current standard treatments for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. However, the safely tolerated dose of standard chemotherapy for Chinese patients is not decided. This study was to evaluate the toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of etoposide and cisplatin concurrent with thoracic radiation therapy for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer., Methods: Patients with histologically proven limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) were eligible. The patients underwent thoracic radiotherapy (45 Gy, 1.5 Gy bid, 30 fractions for 3 weeks) delivered concurrently with etoposide (100 mg/m2 iv, days 1-3) and cisplatin dose escalating from the two levels ( 70 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2 on d1). The primary endpoints were hematologic toxicities during treatment. The secondary endpoints were non-hematologic toxicities, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). According to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 (CTC-AE 4.0), maximum tolerant dosage (MTD) was defined as the highest safely tolerated dose at which no more than one patient out of six experiences dose-limiting toxicity (Grades 4 hematologic), with the next higher dose having at least two out of six patients experience dose-limiting toxicity., Results: From January 2013 to August 2016, 20 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 49.5 (30-68). After the first 6 patients were enrolled in Arm 1 (70 mg/m2 on d1), one patient had Grade 4 neutropenia. Another 14 patients were enrolled in Arm 2 (75 mg/m2 on d1), one patient had Grade 4 neutropenia. The MTD was determined to be etoposide (100 mg/m2 iv, d1-d3) and cisplatin dose (75 mg/m2 on d1). 4 patients had ≥Grade 3 neutropenia and 1 patients had ≥Grade 3 acute esophagitis in Arm 1. 10 patients had ≥Grade 3 neutropenia and no patient had ≥Grade 3 acute esophagitis in Arm 2. All patients with a median follow-up time was 9.0 months, median OS and PFS were not achieved, 1-year OS and PFS were 91% and 61%, respectively., Conclusions: The MTD of RT with concurrent chemotherapy of EP regimen for patients with LS-SCLC was etoposide (100 mg/m2 iv, d1-d3) and cisplatin dose (75 mg/m2 on d1).
.

High level evidence from randomized studies comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to surgery is lacking. Although the results of pooled analysis of two randomized trials for STARS and ROSEL showed that SABR is better tolerated and might lead to better overall survival than surgery for operable clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), SABR, however, is only recommended as a preferred treatment option for early stage NSCLC patients who cannot or will not undergo surgery. We, therefore, are waiting for the results of the ongoing randomized studies [Veterans affairs lung cancer surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy in the US (VALOR) and the SABRTooth study in the United Kingdom (SABRTooths)]. Many retrospective and case control studies showed that SABR is safe and effective (local control rate higher than 90%, 5 years survival rate reached 70%), but there are considerable variations in the definitions and staging of lung cancer, operability determination, and surgical approaches to operable lung cancer (open vs video-assisted). Therefore, it is difficult to compare the superiority of radiotherapy and surgery in the treatment of early staged lung cancer. Most studies demonstrated that the efficacy of the two modalities for early staged lung cancer is equivalent; however, due to the limited data, the conclusions from those studies are difficult to be evidence based. Therefore, the controversies will be focusing on the safety and invasiveness of the two treatment modalities. This article will review the ongoing debate in light of these goals.

Background and Objective: Osteosarcoma is the most frequent primary cancer of bone. The incidence is higher in adolescents. Large improvement, though, has been made in the treatment of osteosarcoma under the framework of multidisciplinary team, an important prognostic factor for osteosarcoma is pulmonary metastasis. Surgical resection of lung metastases is widely accepted as the optimal modality in osteosarcoma patients. Undoubtedly, surgical resection of lung metastases is widely accepted as the optimal modality in osteosarcoma patients. However, since current conceptions within the surgical approach to lung metastasectomy involve multidisciplinary collaboration, which are highly variable,there is not neither consensus nor standardized practice patterns. We conduct a survey aiming to reveal areas of consistency in current clinical practice on lung metastasectomy among Chinese osteosarcoma high volume centers., Methods: A questionnaire survey specific to the nationwide high volume centers of osteosarcoma was conducted from September 2015 to November 2015. Analyses were stratified by hospital, working duration, case volume and medical discipline., Results: Of 150 invited physicians, 105 participated, resulting in an overall response rate of 70%. Forty-one percent of the responded physicians agreed with the statement that orthopedic oncology should play a predominant role in the multidisciplinary team. More than 64% of respondents chose metastasectomy as the preferred local control approach, and up to 78.1% of respondents recommended pulmonary metastasectomy for patients. Compared with orthopedic surgeons, other physicians were significantly more likely to report not advocating pulmonary metastasectomy in their practice (OR(others)=0.02; 95%CI: 0.00-0.22; P=0.001), and thoracic surgeons were more likely to decide metastasectomy according to indications rather than the number limit of metastases (OR(thoracic surgeons)=20.93; 95%CI: 2.05-213.64; P=0.001). For the most preferred radiographic evaluation option, approximately 83% of respondents reported diagnostic use of computed tomography (CT). More than 70% of respondents reported that chest CT follow-up should be 3 months after the primary site resection; approximately 68% deemed the diagnostic accuracy of CT about 90%; most respondents (92%) recommended the extrapulmonary imaging evaluation simultaneously. Around 46% of respondents reported that survival duration longer than 6 months after pulmonary metastasectomy is beneficial., Conclusion: This study offers new information about the variability in the reported management of pulmonary metastatic osteosarcoma in China, reflecting the deficiencies in unified practice patterns. The results of this survey also provide baseline data for future research and for the development of international guidelines.

Background and Objective: With the rapid development of technology, stereotactic radiotherapy has been widely used. In a cohort of medically operable non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) survival rates "potentially equivalent to those of surgery" have been reported. Removing the field flattening filter, Clinac is capable of delivering dose rates much higher than conventional linac as well as reducing the treatment time. The goals of this work were to report safety and efficacy of SBRT treatment using a flattening filter-free model for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with small lesions., Methods: From December 2011 to December 2013, 31 NSCLC patients who were T1-2N0M0, solitary pulmonary recurrence after surgery, and stage IV with oligo metastasis were enrolled, receiving SBRT treatment (60 Gy/8 f or 48 Gy/4 f) applying a flattening filter-free model., Results: Compared with conventional technique, flattening filter-free model shortened the treating time with equivalent target dose and normal tissue dose. The median follow-up time is 19.4 mo. The 1-yr local control, regional control, distant control, progression free survival and overall survival rates were 96.8%, 96.8%, 83.9%, 77.4% and 96.8%. The most common side effects were radiation pneumonitis (29% grade 1, 3.2% grade 2) and chest pain (12.9% grade 1, 6.5% grade 2)., Conclusions: The use of flattening filter-free model in SBRT for small lesions of NSCLC patients is safe and effective. Long time follow-up and additional studies are still needed to validate our conclusions.

Purpose: To analyze the feasibility of omitting clinical target volume (CTV) for limited small cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy., Methods and Materials: 89 patients were treated from January 1, 2008 to August 31, 2011, 54 cases were irradiated with target volume without CTV, and 35 cases were irradiated with CTV. Both arms were irradiated post chemotherapy tumor extent and omitted elective nodal irradiation; dose prescription was 95% PTV56-63 Gy/28-35 F/5.6-7 weeks., Results: In the arm without CTV and arm with CTV, the local relapse rates were 16.7% and 17.1% (p = 0.586) respectively. In the arm without CTV, of the 9 patients with local relapse, 6 recurred in-field, 2 recurred in margin, 1 recurred out of field. In the arm with CTV, of the 6 patients with local relapse, 4 recurred in-field, 1 recurred in margin, 1 recurred out of field. The distant metastases rates were 42.6% and 51.4% (p = 0.274) respectively. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity and radiation esophagitis had no statistically significant, but grade 3-4 radiation pneumonia was observed in only 7.4% in the arm without CTV, compared 22.9% in the arm with CTV (p = 0.040). The median survival in the arm without CTV had not reached, compared with 38 months in the with CTV arm. The l- years, 2- years, 3- years survival rates of the arm without CTV and the arm with CTV were 81.0%, 66.2%, 61.5% and 88.6%, 61.7%, 56.6% (p = 0.517). The multivariate analysis indicated that the distant metastases (p = 0.000) and PCI factor (p = 0.004) were significantly related to overall survival., Conclusions: Target delineation omitting CTV for limited-disease small cell lung cancer received IMRT was feasible. The distant metastases and PCI factor were significantly related to overall survival.

Background and Objective: The presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is predictive of a better response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and initial chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study is to analyze the association between the EGFR mutations and the outcome of combined chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-squamous NSCLC., Methods: Patients with stage III non-squamous NSCLC whose EGFR mutation status had been identified were retrospectively analyzed. The response of 87 patients to combined chemoradiotherapy, the two-year survival rate, and the response of 128 patients to initial chemotherapy were evaluated., Results: The response rate to combined chemoradiotherapy was 84.6% (33/39) in EGFR mutation-positive patients, significantly higher than the 56.3% (27/48) response rate in EGFR mutation-negative patients (P=0.004). Two-year survival rates were 53.8% and 50% in EGFR mutation-positive and mutation-negative patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the overall survival for both patient groups. The overall response rate to initial chemotherapy was 34.5% (19/55) in EGFR mutation-positive patients, compared with the 21.9% (16/73) response rate in EGFR mutation-negative patients., Conclusions: EGFR mutation-positive status can predict better response to combined chemoradiotherapy, but is not associated with overall survival in patients with stage III non-squamous NSCLC.

Background and Objective: Although the guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network of USA recommend that the standard therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LANSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. There is ongoing controversy about the treatment regimen which combines chemotherapy concurrently with radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to compare weekly usage with triple weekly usage of paclitaxel in concurrent radiochemotherapy for patients with LANSCLC, and to obtain the best paclitaxel regimen in the concurrent radiochemotherapy., Methods: From April 2006 to April 2009, some LANSCLC patients in multicenter were randomly divided into weekly usage (45 mg/m², 1 times/week, a total of 270 mg/m² in six weeks) and triple weekly usage (15 mg/m², 3 times/week, a total of 270 mg/m² in six weeks) group of paclitaxel by a random number table. All patients were treated with 3D radiotherapy, and 95% planning target volume (PTV) received a prescription dose of (60-70) Gy/(30-35)times/(6-7)weeks, (1.8-2.0) Gy/fraction. Then the side effects, response and overall survival rate were compared between two groups of patients., Results: Thirty-eight LANSCLC patients were enrolled. Weekly usage and triple weekly usage group were 20 and 18 patients, respectively. In the triple weekly usage group, the side effects were 12 patients had radiation esophagitis of I-II degree, 1 patient had radiation esophagitis of III degree, 2 patients had radiation pneumonitis of I degree, 1 patient had radiation pneumonitis of II degree, 1 patient had radiation pneumonitis of III degree and died of respiratory failure, 2 patients developed weight loss of I degree. In the weekly usage group, the side effects were 11 patients had radiation esophagitis of I-III degree, 6 patients had radiation pneumonitis of II-III degree, 2 patients developed weight loss of I degree, 6 patients developed leucopenia of III-IV degree. The response rate of two groups was 88.8% and 50.0%, respectively (P=0.026). 1-year survival rate of two groups was 79% and 67%, respectively (P=0.607)., Conclusions: Although the preliminary results did not show the merits of survival in triple weekly usage, but preliminary results show that triple weekly usage was more safe and effective than weekly usage of paclitaxel in concurrent radiochemotherapy for patients with LANSCLC.

Background: To evaluate the association between the clinical, dosimetric factors and severe acute radiation pneumonitis (SARP) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LANSCLC) treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)., Methods: We analyzed 94 LANSCLC patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT between May 2005 and September 2006. SARP was defined as greater than or equal 3 side effects and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. The clinical and dosimetric factors were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between clinical, dosimetric factors and SARP., Results: Median follow-up was 10.5 months (range 6.5-24). Of 94 patients, 11 (11.7%) developed SARP. Univariate analyses showed that the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), mean lung dose (MLD), relative volumes of lung receiving more than a threshold dose of 5-60 Gy at increments of 5 Gy (V5-V60), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1) were associated with SARP (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, NTCP value (p = 0.001) and V10 (p = 0.015) were the most significant factors associated with SARP. The incidences of SARP in the group with NTCP > 4.2% and NTCP 50% were 5.7% and 29.2%, respectively (p < 0.01)., Conclusions: NTCP value and V10 are the useful indicators for predicting SARP in NSCLC patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT.

Objective: To evaluate the toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel concurrently with three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LANSCLC) after 2-3 cycles of induction chemotherapy., Research Design and Methods: Patients with histologically proven stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were eligible. Induction chemotherapy regimen included cisplatin (40 mg/m2) on days 1 and 2, and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for 2 or 3 cycles, followed a month later by continual three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions for 6 weeks) delivered concurrently with paclitaxel dose escalating from the lowest level, 15 mg/m2, twice weekly, 6 weeks in all, to the highest level, 15 mg/m2, three times a week, 6 weeks in all., Main Outcome Measures: The MTD was defined as the highest safely tolerated dose at which no more than one patient out of six experiences dose-limiting toxicity, with the next higher dose having at least two out of six patients experience dose-limiting toxicity (DLT)., Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled in this study. The maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel during 3D-conformal radiotherapy was not reached at 15 mg/m2, three times a week, 6 weeks in all, a level which has been recommended for Caucasian patients with LANSCLC without induction chemotherapy. The overall response rate of induction chemotherapy alone was 47.8% (0% complete remission, 47.8% partial remission, 39.1% stable disease, 13% progressive disease) and that of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent treatment was 78.3% (18/23), including 8.7% (2/23) complete remissions. None of the patients died as a result of toxicity. The median survival time was 23.0 months., Conclusions: 15 mg/m2 of paclitaxel, three times a week, concurrently with 3D-conformal radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced NSCLC after 2 or 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy is a safe and effective dose, according to our preliminary study.

Background and objective The presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is predictive of a better response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and initial chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study is to analyze the association between the EGFR mutations and the outcome of combined chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-squamous NSCLC. Methods Patients with stage III non-squamous NSCLC whose EGFR mutation status had been identified were retrospectively analyzed. The response of 87 patients to combined chemoradiotherapy, the two-year survival rate, and the response of 128 patients to initial chemotherapy were evaluated. Results The response rate to combined chemoradiotherapy was 84.6% (33/39) in EGFR mutation-positive patients, significantly higher than the 56.3% (27/48) response rate in EGFR mutation- negative patients (P=0.004). Two-year survival rates were 53.8% and 50% in EGFR mutation-positive and mutation-negative patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the overall survival for both patient groups. The overall response rate to initial chemotherapy was 34.5% (19/55) in EGFR mutation-positive patients, compared with the 21.9% (16/73) response rate in EGFR mutation-negative patients. Conclusion EGFR mutation-positive status can predict better response to combined chemoradiotherapy, but is not associated with overall survival in patients with stage III non-squamous NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]