Search

A rapid, sensitive, robust and specific method was developed for the determination and quantitation of felodipine, in human blood plasma by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry using nimodipine as internal standard. Felodipine was extracted from 0.5 mL human plasma by use of a liquid/liquid procedure using diethyl ether/hexane (80/20, v/v) as eluent. The method included a chromatographic run of 5 min using a C(18) analytical column (100 mm x 4.6 mm i.d.) and the calibration curve was linear over the range from 0.02 to 10 ng mL(-1) (r(2) > 0.994). The between-run precision, determined as relative standard deviation of replicate quality controls, was 5.7% (0.06 ng mL(-1)), 7.1% (0.6 ng mL(-1)) and 6.8% (7.5 ng mL(-1)). The between-run accuracy was +/- 0.0, 2.1 and 3.1% for the above-mentioned concentrations, respectively.

A method based on liquid chromatography with negative ion electrospray ionization and tandem mass spectrometry is described for the determination of nimesulide in human plasma. Liquid-liquid extraction using a mixture of diethyl ether and dichloromethane was employed and celecoxib was used as an internal standard. The chromatographic run time was 4.5 min and the weighted (1/x) calibration curve was linear in the range 10.0-2000 ng x ml(-1). The limit of quantification was 10 ng x ml(-1), the intra-batch precision was 6.3, 2.1 and 2.1% and the intra-batch accuracy was 3.2, 0.3 and 0.1% for 30, 300 and 1200 ng x ml(-1) respectively. The inter-batch precision was 2.3, 2.8 and 2.7% and the accuracy was 3.3, 0.3 and 0.1% for 30, 300 and 1200 ng x ml(-1) respectively. This method was employed in a bioequivalence study of one nimesulide drop formulation (nimesulide 50 mg x ml(-1) drop, Medley S/A Indústria Farmacêutica, Brazil) against one standard nimesulide drop formulation (Nisulid, 50 mg x ml(-1) drop, Astra Médica, Brazil). Twenty-four healthy volunteers (both sexes) took part in the study and received a single oral dose of nimesulide (100 mg, equivalent to 2 ml of either formulation) in an open, randomized, two-period crossover way, with a 2-week washout interval between periods. The 90% confidence interval (CI) for geometric mean ratios between nimesulide and Nisulid were 93.1-109.6% for C(max), 87.7-99.8% for AUC(last) and 88.1-99.7% for AUC(0-infinity). Since the 90% CI for the above-mentioned parameters were included in the 80-125% interval proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration, the two formulations were considered bioequivalent in terms of both rate and extent of absorption., (Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)