Search

Objectives Cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease, such as systemic sclerosis (SSc), are excluded from clinical trials, so the data on tolerability and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in these patients are limited. This study investigated the tolerability and efficacy of anti–programmed death ligand 1 (PD (L)1) immunotherapies in patients with pre-existing SSc. Methods Scleronco-01 was a multicentre, nationwide, open-label, phase IV observational study, from 2019 to 2021. Results Seventeen SSc patients receiving treatment for lung carcinoma (n = 13, 77%), head and neck cancer (n = 2, 12%), melanoma (n = 1, 6%), and colorectal carcinoma (n = 1, 6%) were included. The median (interquartile range) patient age was 60 (34–82) years. Fifteen (88%) patients received anti-PD1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and two (12%) anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab). The median follow-up duration was 12 (range, 2–38) months. Four patients (24%) experienced flare-up of SSc symptoms. Ten patients (59%) developed an immune-related adverse event (grade I–II in 11 patients [65%], grade III–IV in one [6%]) without grade V. The overall response rate was 41% (7/17 patients). The median overall survival was 15.8 (95% confidence interval: 7.3 to not reached) months. Conclusion Anti-PD1 or PD-L1 immunotherapies are suitable options for cancer patients with pre-existing SSc. Longer follow-up periods are required for long-term safety analyses.

The French Sarcoma Group assessed the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) of trabectedin versus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS).This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III study included adults with STS who progressed after 1-3 prior treatment lines. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive trabectedin 1.5 mg/mBetween 26 January 2015 and 5 November 2015, 103 heavily pre-treated patients (60.2% with L-STS) from 16 French centers were allocated to receive trabectedin (n = 52) or BSC (n = 51). Median PFS was 3.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-5.9 months] in the trabectedin arm versus 1.5 months (0.9-2.6 months) in the BSC arm (hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.64, P0.001) with benefits observed across almost all analyzed subgroups, but particularly in patients with L-STS (5.1 versus 1.4 months, P = 0.0001). Seven patients (13.7%) in the trabectedin arm (all with L-STS) achieved a partial response, while no objective responses were observed in the BSC arm (P = 0.004). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (44.2% of patients), leukopenia (34.6%), and transaminase increase (32.7%). Health-related 30-item core European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire evidenced no statistical differences between the arms for any domain and at any time point. After progression, 91.8% of patients crossed over from BSC to trabectedin.Trabectedin demonstrates superior disease control to BSC without impairing QoL in patients with recurrent STS of multiple histologies, with greater impact in patients with L-STS.

Background This multi-cohort trial explored the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with advanced sarcomas of bone origin; this report details the cohort of patients with metastatic or locally advanced chondrosarcoma (CS), progressing after prior chemotherapy. Patients and methods Patients with CS, progressing despite prior standard therapy, were randomised (2:1) to receive regorafenib or placebo. Patients on placebo could crossover to receive regorafenib after centrally confirmed progressive disease. The primary endpoint was progression-free rate (PFR) at 12 weeks. With one-sided α of 0.05, and 80% power, at least 16/24 progression-free patients at 12 weeks were needed for success (P0 = 50%, P1 = 75%). Results From September 2014 to February 2019, 46 patients were included in the CS cohort, and 40 patients were evaluable for efficacy: 16 on placebo and 24 on regorafenib. Thirteen patients (54.2%; 95% CI [35.8%-[) were non-progressive at 12 weeks on regorafenib versus 5 (31.3%; 95% CI [13.2%-[);) on placebo. Median PFS was 19.9 weeks on regorafenib, and 8.0 on placebo. Fourteen placebo patients crossed over to regorafenib after progression. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events on regorafenib included hypertension (12%), asthenia (8%), thrombocytopenia (8%) and diarrhoea (8%). One episode of fatal liver dysfunction occurred on regorafenib. Conclusion Although the primary endpoint was not met statistically in this small randomised cohort, there is modest evidence to suggest that regorafenib might slow disease progression in patients with metastatic CS after the failure of prior chemotherapy. Clinical trial registration The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02389244 ).

Objectives Continuous chemotherapy has been used to treat patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (mESCC), despite weak evidence supporting a clinical benefit, associated side effects for the patients, and unjustified medical costs. In the French setting, we conducted a cost-utility analysis alongside the randomized E-DIS trial (NCT01248299), which compared first-line fluorouracil/platinum-based chemotherapy continuation (CT-CONT) to CT discontinuation (CT-DISC) in progressive-free patients after an initial 6-week treatment phase. Methods A partitioned survival analysis was performed using patient-level data collected during the trial for survival outcomes, quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), and medical costs. The mean quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and medical costs were estimated over an 18-month period to assess the incremental net monetary benefit and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Uncertainty was handled using the nonparametric bootstrap and univariate analysis. Sixty-seven patients with mESCC were randomized and included in the cost-utility analysis. Results On average, CT-CONT slightly decreased the number of QALYs (-0.038) and increased the cost per patient (+ €1177). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50 000/QALY, the incremental net monetary benefit was negative (-€3077 [95% confidence interval: -6564; 4359]), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was -30 958€/QALY (CT-CONT dominated). The probability of the CT-CONT treatment option being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50 000/QALY, compared to CT-DISC, was 29%. Conclusions CT-DISC may be considered as an alternative therapeutic option to CT-CONT in patients with mESCC who have stable disease after an initial chemotherapy treatment phase. A continuous chemotherapy could indeed reduce the number of QALYs because of the disutility associated with the continuous treatment.

Resume La prise en charge de patients oncologiques, notamment hospitalises, peut amener a discuter, quasi quotidiennement les « Limitation et/ou Arret des Therapeutiques » (LAT). Nous proposons ici l’historique et la synthese des textes encadrant la notion de limitation des therapeutiques actives en oncologie en France. Cette decision est encadree par la Loi Claeys-Leonetti du 2 fevrier 2016 qui recommande une reflexion collegiale et la tracabilite de l’information dans le dossier medical. La decision de LAT est l’objet d’une discussion avec le patient, ses medecins et ses proches qui peut avoir lieu a tout moment de sa prise en charge. Les travaux de nos collegues reanimateurs fournissent de nombreuses recommandations, utiles, dans des situations aigues observees en milieu oncologique. Cependant il y a peu d’articles specifiques a la pratique oncologique . Il s’agit d’une thematique dont doivent s’emparer les oncologues.

Purpose: The role of resection of the primary tumour in management of patients with OMBC is controversial. Loco-regional treatment (LRT) with curative intent could be discussed considered for OMBC patients, who experience good response to systemic therapy. We retrospectively studied the impact of resection of the primary tumour on overall survival (OS) for de novo OMBC treated at Oscar Lambret Center in Lille.Patients and methods: Between 2005 and 2017, all consecutive patients were selected. De novo OMBC was defined by 1 to 5 metastases in 1 or 2 organs, diagnosed within three months after primary tumor. Clinical data, tumor characteristics, metastatic sites, locoregional treatment, systemic first line treatment were recorded retrospectively. We set up 2 groups according to therapeutic strategy. Group 1 patients were managed with a prior planned curative intent surgery and systemic treatments and group 2 included patients with systemic therapy alone, without plan of surgery.Results: 116 patients were included in our analysis; 78 patients in group 1 and 38 patients in group 2. Median age was 54,9 years (25,2-86,2) with no difference between both groups (p=0,08). TNM stage, cancer histologies were comparable in both groups, excluding that there were more HER2+ tumour in Group 2 (p=0.003). 81 patients underwent LRT, 69 patients in group 1 and 12 patients in group 2. 59% of them had radical mastectomy and 89% had axillary surgery. For 29% of them, surgery was performed before knowledge of metastatic disease. The other main indications of breast surgery included stable disease (50%), local progression (9%), palliation (5%), single metastasis (5%) and complete metastatic response after chemotherapy (2%). 59 of 81 patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. Regarding systemic first line treatment, patients in group 1 received more chemotherapy (63% vs 86%, p=0.01), anti-HER2 treatment was appropriate except for 6 patients because of heart disease and 69% of patients had hormone therapy with no difference in both groups. Regarding metastases at diagnosis, the mean number of metastases was 2,1 (SD=1,2), 103 patients (89%) had one metastatic site, and 13 patients (11%) had two metastatic sites, with no difference between both groups. Secondary bone involvement was most prevalent site (69%). There was no difference between both groups in metastasis distribution. Median OS was 70,2 months in our cohort. LRT did not improve OS (HR 1,23; 95% CI [0,75-2,00] p=0,41), even after adjustment on age and HER2 status. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 30,2 months in our cohort. LRT did not improve PFS in comparison with systemic treatment alone (HR 1,38; 95% CI [0,91- 2,11] p=0,13).Conclusion: We found that LRT did not improve outcome (PFS or OS) in OMBC patients. This is in line with recently issued large randomized phase III trial. LRT is not a standard of care in OMBC, nevertheless, further clinical studies are needed to better identify the subgroup of OMBC patients that could benefit from LRT, at least in term of quality of life. Citation Format: Charlotte Debuquoy, Claudia Regis, Jennifer Wallet, David Pasquier, Nicolas Penel, Marie-Cecile Le Deley, Marie-Pierre Chauvet, Emilie Kaczmarek. The role of resection of the primary tumour in patients with de novo oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-58.

Purpose: Overall prognosis of advanced sarcoma remains poor, optimization of systemic treatment is urgently needed in this setting. Materials and methods: We systematically reviewed fully published English-speaking literature about maintenance therapy and drug holiday in sarcoma patients management. Results: We found that switch maintenance therapy with cyclophosphamide/vinorelbine improves the outcome of localized high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma. There is no other maintenance therapy recommended in sarcoma patients. After classical chemotherapy, maintenance therapy with immune-stimulating agents for localized osteosarcoma, bevacizumab for advanced angiosarcoma or pediatric advanced sarcoma, or mTOR inhibitors for metastatic sarcoma does not improve the outcome. Drug holiday has been assessed for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with imatinib as the first-line therapy or for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma treated with trabectedin. Drug holiday has been found to lead to rapid disease progression and should be avoided. Conclusions: Data about both maintenance and drug holiday are spare in sarcoma management.

BackgroundOlanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that has affinity for many central nervous system receptors. Its efficacy is supported by several studies in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. No recommendations exist on the antiemetic use of olanzapine in the palliative care setting. The aim of this work is to complete the initial work of Fonte et al. published in 2015, to determine whether the literature supports the use of olanzapine as an antiemetic in palliative situations and, in practice, to propose a therapeutic schema adapted to the palliative setting.MethodsSystematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA criteria. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, RefDoc, EMBase databases and the gray literature databases. The bibliographic search was conducted between November 2016 and August 2017.ResultsThirteen articles were included: 2 case studies, 3 case series, 3 retrospective studies, 2 prospective studies, 2 literature reviews. All studies concluded on the efficacy of olanzapine as an antiemetic in the palliative care setting. No serious adverse effects were reported. Based on the data from the literature review, we propose a therapeutic scheme adapted to the palliative care context.ConclusionAction of olanzapine on many receptors and its tolerance profile make it an interesting antiemetic treatment in palliative medicine. But to date, studies are scarce and have a low statistical power. Further investigation is therefore needed to determine the benefit of this treatment in palliative care patients, compared to usual treatments.

Background: Approximately 10%-20% of breast cancers (BCs) are classified as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC lacks targeted treatment options and has a poor prognosis. Bintrafusp alfa (M7824) is an innovative first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGF-βRII receptor (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking PD-L1. We report interim results in patients with advanced TNBC treated with bintrafusp alfa in an expansion cohort of an ongoing, open-label, phase 1 trial (NCT02517398). Methods: Eligible patients had confirmed TNBC (ER: IHC Results: As of August 24, 2018, 33 patients with heavily pretreated TNBC (54.5% of patients had ≥4 prior regimens) were enrolled in this study of bintrafusp alfa. Patients received a median of 3 doses of bintrafusp alfa (range, 1-24). Confirmed responses as assessed by IRC and investigator occurred in 3 patients (1 complete response and 2 partial responses as assessed by IRC; ORR, 9.1% [95% CI, 1.9%-24.3%]); disease control was achieved in a total of 5 patients (15.2% [95% CI, 5.1%-31.9%]) by both IRC and investigator read. The median progression-free survival per IRC was 1.3 months (95% CI, 1.2-1.4 months), and the median overall survival was 7.8 months (95% CI, 2.1-12.8 months). Importantly, a biomarker related to TGF-β biology was identified via RNAseq analysis of tumor samples with 32.0-fold higher expression in patients who experienced disease control (response or stable disease) compared with those who had progressive disease (biomarker results for this expansion cohort are presented in a separate abstract). PD-L1 expression was not associated with response to treatment. In the entire cohort, 6 patients (18.2%) experienced ≥1 grade 3 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), including anemia (n=3), asthenia, decreased appetite, generalized rash, hypophysitis, and increased transaminases (all n=1). No grade 4 TRAEs were reported. Three patients discontinued treatment due to TRAEs, including 1 death that was assessed by the investigator as related to treatment. Dyspnea, hemolysis, and thrombocytopenia were reported as grade 5 TRAEs in this patient, who had extensive disease at trial entry and was noted to have multiple pulmonary emboli, progressive disease, and expanding pleural effusion after 3 doses. No autoantibodies mediating hemolysis or thrombocytopenia were identified on workup. Conclusions: In summary, bintrafusp alfa was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with expectations in this heavily pretreated, advanced TNBC cohort. We identified high expression of a potential predictive biomarker of response in patients with advanced TNBC treated with bintrafusp alfa. Detailed biomarker data are presented in the separate abstract and warrant further investigation of bintrafusp alfa in TNBC. Citation Format: Alexander Spira, Ahmad Awada, Nicolas Isambert, David Lorente Estellés, John Nemunaitis, Nicolas Penel, Laureen S Ojalvo, Christoph Helwig, Christian Borel. Bintrafusp alfa (M7824), a bifunctional fusion protein targeting transforming growth factor-β and programmed death ligand 1, in advanced triple-negative breast cancer: Preliminary results from a phase 1 cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-06.

Background Metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) management remains an unmet medical need. We assessed the activity and safety of regorafenib in patients with metastatic non-adipocytic STS who were previously treated with both chemotherapy and pazopanib. Patients and methods This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter comparative randomized phase II trial included patients with histologically proven advanced and inoperable STS. Patients receiving placebo were offered optional cross-over for centrally confirmed disease progression. Primary end-point was centrally reviewed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours–based progression-free survival (PFS), analysed on the intent-to-treat data set. In total, 24 events were required for 90% power, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.33 (median PFS, 3.6 versus 1.2 months), and 1-sided α = 0.1 ( ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01900743 ). Results From December 2015 to October 2017, 37 patients were randomized; 18 to regorafenib and 19 to placebo. Thirteen patients assigned to placebo switched to regorafenib after progression. Median follow-up was 27.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.4–not reached). We observed a significant PFS benefit of regorafenib compared with placebo (adjusted HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.15–0.74; p = 0.0007 median PFS = 2.1 versus 1.1 months, respectively), and a large and nearly significant overall survival (OS) benefit despite the cross-over (adjusted HR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.23–1.06; p = 0.007; median OS = 17.8 versus 8.2 months). Before cross-over, the most common grade III or higher adverse events were lymphopenia (5 versus 1, respectively), diarrhoea (4 versus 0), dyspnoea (3 versus 1), skin toxicity (3 versus 0), arterial hypertension (2 versus 0), and increased transaminases (2 versus 0). Conclusion The present study demonstrated a meaningful clinical anti-tumour activity with regorafenib in heavily pre-treated patients with non-adipocytic STS.

Metastatic phyllodes tumors have poor prognosis with median overall survival of 11.5 months. The objective of this study is to identify prognostic factors and the best options for management of metastatic malignant phyllode tumors (MMPTs). A multicentric retrospective study, including cases of MMPT from 10 sarcoma centers, was conducted. The primary end-point was overall survival (OS), and the secondary end-point was the clinical benefit of chemotherapy (CBCT) rate. 51 MMPT patients were included. Median time from diagnosis to metastatic recurrence was 13 months. Management of MMPT consisted in surgery of the metastatic disease for 16 patients (31.3%), radiation therapy of the metastatic disease for 15 patients (31.9%), and chemotherapy for 37 patients (72.5%). Median follow-up was 62.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 31–80 months]. Median OS was 11.5 months (95% CI 7.5–18.7 months). On multivariate analysis, two or more metastatic sites [hazard ratio (HR) 2.81, 95% CI 1.27–6.19; p = 0.01] and surgery of metastasis (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14–0.78; p = 0.01) were independently associated with OS. The CBCT rate was 31.4% and 16.7% for the first and second lines. Polychemotherapy was not superior to single-agent therapy. Alkylating-agent-based chemotherapy, possibly associated with anthracyclines, was associated with a better CBCT rate than anthracyclines alone (p = 0.049). The results of this study emphasize the impact of the number of metastatic sites on survival of MMPT patients and the leading role of metastasis surgery in MMPT management. If systemic therapy is used, it should include alkylating agents, which are associated with a better clinical benefit.

We review the role of hormonal therapy in the management of different conjunctive tumors. Progestin and aromatase inhibitors seem active in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, but larger case-series are needed. There is no evidence to support the use of hormonal therapy as an adjuvant treatment for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. We did not find relevant data on the use of hormonal therapy for other uterine sarcomas (e.g., high-grade endometrial sarcoma, undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, and adenosarcoma). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, anti-estrogens and aromatase inhibitor seem active in advanced aggressive angiomyxoma, but larger studies are warranted. The use of aromatase inhibitor in estrogen-receptor-positive uterine leiomyosarcoma requires further clinical investigation. There is no evidence supporting the use of hormonal therapy in desmoid-type fibromatosis. International collaboration efforts are warranted to better explore the role of hormonal therapies in management of estrogen-receptor-positive uterine leiomyosarcoma, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and aggressive angiomyxoma.

BackgroundRecurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) disease develops in approximately 65% of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and is associated with a poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have proven effective in multiple tumor types, including R/M SCCHN. We report the efficacy and safety of avelumab (antiprogrammed death ligand 1 antibody) in an expansion cohort of patients with platinum-refractory/ineligible R/M SCCHN enrolled in the phase I JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial (NCT01772004).MethodsEligible patients with R/M SCCHN were aged ≥18 years and had received ≥1 line of platinum-based chemotherapy with disease progression or recurrence within 6 months of the last dose or were ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy. All patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Tumor assessments were carried out by a blinded independent review committee (IRC) and investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Key endpoints included best overall response, duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by IRC and investigator per RECIST 1.1, overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsBetween April 24, 2015, and November 13, 2015, 153 patients were enrolled. Patients had a median of two prior lines of therapy for metastatic or locally advanced disease (range 0–6); 12 patients (7.8%) were not eligible for platinum-based chemotherapy. At data cut-off (December 31, 2017), the confirmed objective response rate was 9.2% (95% CI 5.1% to 14.9%) assessed by IRC and 13.1% (95% CI 8.2% to 19.5%) assessed by investigator. Median DOR was not reached (95% CI 4.2 to not estimable) based on IRC assessment. Median PFS was 1.4 months (95% CI 1.4 to 2.6) assessed by IRC and 1.8 months (95% CI 1.4 to 2.7) assessed by investigator; median OS was 8.0 months (95% CI 6.5 to 10.2). Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 83 patients (54.2%) and were grade ≥3 in 10 patients (6.5%). The most common TRAEs were fatigue (n=19, 12.4%), fever (n=14, 9.2%), pruritus (n=12, 7.8%), and chills (n=11, 7.2%), and there were no treatment-related deaths.ConclusionAvelumab showed clinical activity and was associated with a low rate of grade ≥3 TRAEs in heavily pretreated patients with platinum-refractory/ineligible R/M SCCHN.

The benefit of chemotherapy (CT) in rare bone sarcomas is not documented in prospective studies. This retrospective study from the French sarcoma network for bone tumors ResOs was performed in adult patients (pts) from 1976 to 2014, with histologically verified diagnosis of leiomyosarcomas (LMS), undifferentiated pleomorphic (UPS), or radiation-associated sarcomas of bone. The median follow-up was 4.7 years (95% CI 3.7-6.5). Clinical features, treatment modalities and outcomes were recorded and analyzed from 145 pts (median age 53 years [range 20-87]). Site of disease was extremities (66%) or axial skeleton (34%), 111 (77%) presented with localized and potentially resectable disease. The most common histological subtypes were UPS (58%) and LMS (33%); 58% were high-grade tumors. Surgery was performed in 127 pts. In the 111 localized pts, 28 pts (25%) underwent upfront surgery or exclusive radiotherapy (RT; > 50 Grays) without CT, whereas 83 pts (75%) received either neo-adjuvant (n = 26) or adjuvant CT (n = 13) or both (n = 44). Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant CT was mostly doxorubicin- (95%/86%) and cisplatin- (67%/63%) based. R0 resection was achieved in 59 pts, and a good histological response in 15 patients (25%). Adjuvant RT was performed in 24 (22%) pts. For the whole cohort (n=145), the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 53% [42; 62]. In univariate analysis, age ≤60 was associated with a longer disease-free survival (DFS)(p = 0.0436). Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant CT tended to be associated with better DFS (p=0.056) with no significant impact on OS in this retrospective series. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Background Uterine leiomyosarcomas (U-LMSs) and soft tissue leiomyosarcomas (ST-LMSs) are rare tumours with poor prognosis when locally advanced or metastatic, and with moderate chemosensitivity. In 2015 we reported very encouraging results of the LMS-02 study (NCT02131480) with manageable toxicity. Herein, we report the updated and long-term results of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients and methods Patients received 60 mg/m2 intravenous doxorubicin followed by trabectedin 1.1 mg/m2 as a 3-h infusion on day 1 and pegfilgrastim on day 2, every 3 weeks, up to six cycles. Surgery for residual disease was permitted. Patients were stratified into U-LMS and ST-LMS groups. Results One-hundred and eight patients were enrolled, mainly with metastatic disease (85%), and 20 patients (18.5%) had surgical resection of metastases after chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 7.2 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.9-8.2 years], the median PFS was 10.1 months (95% CI 8.5-12.6 months) in the whole population, and 8.3 months (95% CI 7.4-10.3 months) and 12.9 months (95% CI 9.2-14.1 months) for U-LMSs and ST-LMSs, respectively. The median OS was 34.4 months (95% CI 26.9-42.7 months), 27.5 months (95% CI 17.9-38.2 months), and 38.7 months (95% CI 31.0-52.9 months) for the whole population, U-LMSs, and ST-LMSs, respectively. The median OS of the patients with resected metastases was not reached versus 31.6 months in the overall population without surgery (95% CI 23.9-35.4 months). Conclusions These updated results confirm the impressive efficiency of the doxorubicin plus trabectedin combination given in first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced/metastatic LMS in terms of PFS and OS. Results of the LMS04 trial (NCT02997358), a randomized phase III study comparing the doxorubicin plus trabectedin combination versus doxorubicin alone in first-line therapy in metastatic LMSs, are pending., Highlights • Long-term results on PFS and OS of doxorubicin and trabectedin in first-line treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma. • The update confirms the impressive efficiency of the doxo+trab in terms of PFS and OS. • Results of a randomized phase-III study comparing dox+trab combination versus doxo alone in first-line therapy in metastatic LMS are pending.

Purpose of review Desmoid-type fibromatosis, a rare locally aggressive fibroblastic proliferation, is a treatment challenge. This review aimed to explore recent data about the management of desmoid-type fibromatosis. Recent findings New data underline the role of kinases and [Latin Small Letter Gamma]-secretase in stimulating cell proliferation and invasiveness in desmoid-type fibromatosis. This explains the proven activity of multikinase inhibitors (sorafenib or pazopanib) in the management of desmoid-type fibromatosis or the emerging role of a [Latin Small Letter Gamma]-secretase inhibitor. An international guideline for management was recently published, and this guideline take into account patient point of view. Lastly, recent studies highlight the multidimensional burden of desmoid-type fibromatosis, particularly health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Summary Active surveillance with planned MRI is the first-line management in desmoid-type fibromatosis. A site-specific and stepwise approach should be considered for progressive desmoid-type fibromatosis. Further, a risk-benefit analysis that considers the side effects and long-term sequelae should be conducted before deciding to start any treatment. A less aggressive approach should be considered. Multikinase inhibitors are effective, but their tolerability and side effects should be discussed with the patients. The symptoms and HRQoL should be integrated in decision-making. Desmoid-type fibromatosis patients should be offered support to address their needs supportive care.

BackgroundSpatial inequalities in cancer management have been evidenced by studies reporting lower quality of care or/and lower survival for patients living in remote or socially deprived areas. NETSARC+ is a national reference network implemented to improve the outcome of sarcoma patients in France since 2010, providing remote access to specialized diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Tumour Board (MTB). The IGéAS research program aims to assess the potential of this innovative organization, with remote management of cancers including rare tumours, to go through geographical barriers usually impeding the optimal management of cancer patients.MethodsUsing the nationwide NETSARC+ databases, the individual, clinical and geographical determinants of the access to sarcoma-specialized diagnosis and MTB were analysed. The IGéAS cohort (n = 20,590) includes all patients living in France with first sarcoma diagnosis between 2011 and 2014. Early access was defined as specialised review performed before 30 days of sampling and as first sarcoma MTB discussion performed before the first surgery.ResultsSome clinical populations are at highest risk of initial management without access to sarcoma specialized services, such as patients with non-GIST visceral sarcoma for diagnosis [OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.78 to 2.15] and MTB discussion [OR 3.56, 95% CI 3.16 to 4.01]. Social deprivation of the municipality is not associated with early access on NETSARC+ remote services. The quintile of patients furthest away from reference centres have lower chances of early access to specialized diagnosis [OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.31] and MTB discussion [OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.40] but this influence of the distance is slight in comparison with clinical factors and previous studies on the access to cancer-specialized facilities.ConclusionsIn the context of national organization driven by reference network, distance to reference centres slightly alters the early access to sarcoma specialized services and social deprivation has no impact on it. The reference networks’ organization, designed to improve the access to specialized services and the quality of cancer management, can be considered as an interesting device to reduce social and spatial inequalities in cancer management. The potential of this organization must be confirmed by further studies, including survival analysis.

Retrospective analyses suggest that patients with advanced KIT exon 9-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) receiving imatinib 800 mg (rather than 400 mg) daily have better outcomes. In the adjuvant setting, the question of the optimal dose of imatinib remains unsettled. We aimed to retrospectively assess the activity of imatinib 400 mg in both the adjuvant and the advanced settings. We performed a multicenter study of patients with KIT exon 9-mutated GIST starting imatinib at 400 mg daily. We examined the relapse-free survival (RFS) among high-risk patients either receiving or not receiving adjuvant imatinib. In patients with advanced disease, progression-free survival (PFS, progression under imatinib 400 mg), time to imatinib failure (TIF, progression under imatinib 400, then 800 mg upon first progression), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. In the post-operative setting (n = 37), 20 patients received adjuvant imatinib. Median RFS in high-risk patients receiving adjuvant imatinib (n = 14) was not reached (95% CI 17.5–46.6) versus 13.6 months (95% CI 4.7–13.6) for those who did not (p = 0.37), after a median follow-up of 58 months. RFS at 36 months was 63% (30.3–96.6) versus 40% (95% CI 0–82.9), p = 0.2. In advanced disease (n = 28), median PFS, TIF and OS were 12.7 months (95% CI 6.1–18.2), 21.0 months (95% CI 17.4–28.1) and 47.0 months (95% CI 33.5–69.2), respectively. Despite the limitations of a retrospective analysis and the small number of patients, the benefit of adjuvant imatinib 400 mg daily in high-risk patients appeared relevant. Patients with advanced disease receiving imatinib 400 mg with subsequent dose escalation had a TIF similar to that observed with an initial dose of 800 mg. Intra-patient dose escalation in this setting might be an option.

Background In 2004, we started an intergroup randomized trial of adjuvant imatinib versus no further therapy after R0-R1 surgery in localized, high/intermediate-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) patients. Interim analysis results were published in 2015 upon recommendation from an independent data review committee. We report the final outcome of the study. Patients and methods This was a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III trial carried out at 112 hospitals in 12 countries. Patients were randomized to 2 years of imatinib, 400 mg daily, or no further therapy after surgery. The primary endpoint was imatinib failure-free survival (IFFS), while relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse-free interval (RFI), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Adjusting for the interim analyses, results on IFFS were assessed on a 4.3% significance level; for the other endpoints, 5% was used. Results Nine hundred and eight patients were randomized between January 2005 and October 2008: 454 to imatinib and 454 to observation; 835 patients were eligible. With a median follow-up of 9.1 years, 5 (10)-year IFFS was 87% (75%) in the imatinib arm versus 83% (74%) in the control arm [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87, 95.7% confidence interval (CI) (0.65; 1.15), P = 0.31]; RFS was 70% versus 63% at 5 years and 63% versus 61% at 10 years, [HR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.57; 0.89), P = 0.002]; OS was 93% versus 92% at 5 years and 80% versus 78% at 10 years [HR = 0.88, 95% CI (0.65; 1.21), P = 0.43]. Among 526 patients with high-risk GIST by local pathology, 10-year IFFS and RFS were 69% versus 61%, and 48% versus 43%, respectively. Conclusions With 9.1 years of follow-up, a trend toward better long-term IFFS in imatinib-treated patients was observed in the high-risk subgroup. Although the difference was not statistically significant and the surrogacy value of such an endpoint is not validated, this may be seen as supporting the results reported by the Scandinavian/German trial, showing a sustained small but significant long-term OS benefit in high-risk GIST patients treated with 3 years of adjuvant imatinib.

Summary Background Pre-clinical and clinical evidence suggests that simultaneous blockade of VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and PD-1 or PD-L1 enhances antigen-specific T-cell migration, antitumour activity, and has favourable toxicity. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety and preliminary antitumour activity of ramucirumab (an IgG1 VEGFR-2 antagonist) combined with pembrolizumab (an IgG4 PD-1 antagonist) in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, or urothelial carcinoma. Methods We did a multicohort, non-randomised, open-label, phase 1a/b trial at 16 academic medical centres, hospitals, and clinics in the USA, France, Germany, Spain, and the UK. We enrolled adult patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (cohorts A and B), non-small-cell lung cancer (cohort C), or urothelial carcinoma (cohort D), whose disease had progressed on one or two lines of previous therapy (for those with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma) or one to three lines of previous therapy (for those with non-small-cell lung cancer and urothelial carcinoma) that included platinum (for all tumour types) or fluoropyrimidine or both (for gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma). Eligibility criteria included presence of measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1. Patients with previously untreated gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and non-small-cell lung cancer were also enrolled (in two additional separate cohorts); the results for these cohorts will be reported separately. The first 21-day treatment cycle was a dose-limiting toxicity observation period (phase 1a; safety run-in), followed by a phase 1b cohort expansion stage. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously on day 1, and intravenous ramucirumab was administered at 8 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 for cohort A or at 10 mg/kg on day 1 for cohorts B, C, and D, every 3 weeks, until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of ramucirumab in combination with pembrolizumab assessed by the incidence of adverse events in both phase 1a and 1b and as dose-limiting toxicities during phase 1a. The safety and activity analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02443324 , and is no longer enrolling patients. Findings Between July 30, 2015 and June 24, 2016, we enrolled and treated 92 patients (41 with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, 27 with non-small-cell lung cancer, and 24 with urothelial carcinoma). Median follow-up was 32·8 months (IQR 28·1–33·6). During the first cycle of treatment (phase 1a safety run-in; n=11), one patient with gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who received the 8 mg/kg dose of ramucirumab had grade 3 abdominal pain, colitis, hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, and jaundice, and grade 4 cholestasis, and died on treatment on day 40; the death was deemed related to progressive disease. No additional dose-limiting toxicities occurred and the decision was made to maintain the full planned doses of ramucirumab and pembrolizumab in phase 1b (n=81). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 75 (82%) of 92 patients, the most common of which was fatigue (in 33 patients [36%]), predominantly of grade 1 or 2 severity. 22 patients (24%) had one or more treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse, most commonly hypertension (six patients; 7%) and colitis (five patients; 5%). Serious adverse events occurred in 53 (58%) of 92 patients, and were deemed related to treatment in 22 (24%) patients. The most common treatment-related serious adverse events were abdominal pain in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (in three [7%] of 41 patients); asthenia and myocardial infarction in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (two [7%] of 27 patients), and colitis in patients with urothelial carcinoma (two [8%] of 24 patients). Six (7%) of 92 patients discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events, and one death (from pulmonary sepsis in a patient with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma) was deemed related to treatment. The number of patients achieving an objective response was three (7%; 95% CI 1·5–19·9) of 41 in the gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma cohort, eight (30%; 13·8–50·2) of 27 in the non-small-cell lung cancer cohort, and three (13%, 2·7–32·4) in the urothelial carcinoma cohort. Interpretation Ramucirumab in combination with pembrolizumab showed a manageable safety profile with favourable antitumour activity in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Our results contribute to the growing evidence that supports dual inhibition of the VEGF–VEGFR2 and PD-1–PD-L1 pathways. This combination could be further explored with or without chemotherapy, especially for patients with tumours for which single-agent checkpoint inhibitors have shown no additional benefit over chemotherapy. Funding Eli Lilly and Company, and Merck and Co.

Screening (secondary prevention) is a public health action aimed at identifying diseases at their earliest stages, before the onset of signs and symptoms and, thus, avoiding or mitigating their negative consequences. The abnormality can be a genetic defect, an infection or the preclinical phase of a chronic disease such as cancer. We discuss elements common to the cancer screening debate: vocabulary about screening, overdiagnosis, and program indication criteria. Finally, we present some significant evolutions on the programs since their implementation in France.

The editorial board of Bulletin du Cancer presents some hot topics published or presented in major oncology meetings in 2018. This selection is related to pediatric oncology and to solid and hemato-malignancies in adults, with immunotherapy approaches (checkpoints or CAR-T) as one of the major breakthroughs. Putative impacts on daily practices are discussed, in order to detail what will really change our practice.

We propose herein a short synthesis of evidence leading to deny organized screening of prostate cancer using PSA plus or minus rectal digital examination. Nevertheless, many scientific societies support opportunistic screening on basis of shared decision. Today, numerous proposals had been made to reduce the overdiagnosis and overtreatreatment.

International audience; PurposeThe objective of this study was to describe the outcome and prognostic factors for adults treated for localized myxofibrosarcoma.Methods and MaterialsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 425 nonmetastatic patients who underwent surgery between January 1996 and December 2015 in French National Group and were enrolled in the Conticabase. Pathologic diagnosis was systematically reviewed by expert pathologists. The endpoints were relapse-free and metastasis-free survival. Log-rank tests and Cox models have been used to identified prognostic factors.ResultsMedian age was 66 years; 53% were males; 85% of cases occurred in limbs or superficial trunk; median size was 60 mm; 47% and 39% were grades 2 and 3, respectively; 66% had R0 resection and 34% R1 resection. Adjuvant radiation therapy was given to 65% of patients, neoadjuvant radiation therapy to 3%, neoadjuvant chemotherapy to 7%, and adjuvant chemotherapy to 13%. The median follow-up was 51 months. The 5-year local relapse–free survival was 67%; independent prognostic factors for local relapse were R1 resection (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.26; P = .001) and adjuvant radiation therapy (HR = 0.35; P = .0001) (ie, R1 resection and no adjuvant radiation therapy increase the hazard ratio). In stratified analysis, adjuvant radiation therapy was beneficial after R0 resection (P = .0020) and after R1 resection (P = .0001). The 5-year overall survival was 80%. The 5-year metastasis-free survival was 83%. Independent prognostic factors for metastatic relapse were grade 3 disease (HR = 1.975; P = .0001) and tumor size (HR = 1.006; P = .001).ConclusionsThis large series of myxofibrosarcoma confirms the high rate of local relapse. Combination of R0 resection and adjuvant radiation therapy provided the best local control. In parallel with an increasing rate of R0 resection and adjuvant radiation therapy, we observed a constant improvement in both metastatic and local relapse–free survival during the study.

[Background] This observational, retrospective effort across Europe, US, Australia, and Asia aimed to assess the activity of systemic therapies in EHE, an ultra-rare sarcoma, marked by WWTR1-CAMTA1 or YAP1-TFE3 fusions., [Methods] Twenty sarcoma reference centres contributed data. Patients with advanced EHE diagnosed from 2000 onwards and treated with systemic therapies, were selected. Local pathologic review and molecular confirmation were required. Radiological response was retrospectively assessed by local investigators according to RECIST. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method., [Results] Overall, 73 patients were included; 21 had more than one treatment. Thirty-three patients received anthracyclines regimens, achieving 1 (3%) partial response (PR), 25 (76%) stable disease (SD), 7 (21%) progressive disease (PD). The median (m-) PFS and m-OS were 5.5 and 14.3 months respectively. Eleven patients received paclitaxel, achieving 1 (9%) PR, 6 (55%) SD, 4 (36%) PD. The m-PFS and m-OS were 2.9 and 18.6 months, respectively. Twelve patients received pazopanib, achieving 3 (25%) SD, 9 (75%) PD. The m-PFS and m-OS were.2.9 and 8.5 months, respectively. Fifteen patients received INF-α 2b, achieving 1 (7%) PR, 11 (73%) SD, 3 (20%) PD. The m-PFS and m-OS were 8.9 months and 64.3, respectively. Among 27 patients treated with other regimens, 1 PR (ifosfamide) and 9 SD (5 gemcitabine +docetaxel, 2 oral cyclophosphamide, 2 others) were reported., [Conclusion] Systemic therapies available for advanced sarcomas have limited activity in EHE. The identification of new active compounds, especially for rapidly progressive cases, is acutely needed.

BackgroundHome hospitalization at the end of life can sometimes be perturbed by unplanned hospital admissions (UHAs, defined as any admission that is not part of a preplanned care procedure), which increase the likelihood of death in hospital. The objectives were to describe the occurrence and causes of UHAs in cancer patients receiving end-of-life care at home, and to identify factors associated with UHAs and death in hospital.MethodsA retrospective, single-center study (performed at a regional cancer center in the city of Lille, northern France) of advanced cancer patients discharged to home hospitalization between January 2014 and December 2017. We estimated the incidence of UHA over time using Kaplan-Meier method and Kalbfleish and Prentice method. We investigated factors associated with the risk UHA in cause-specific Cox models. We evaluated factors associated with death in hospital in logistic regressions.ResultsOne hundred and forty-two patients were included in the study. Eighty-two patients (57.7 %) experienced one or more UHAs, a high proportion of which occurred within 1 month after discharge to home. Most UHAs were related to physical symptoms and were initiated by the patient’s family physician. A post-discharge palliative care consultation was associated with a significantly lower incidence of UHAs. Sixty-five patients (47.8 % of the deaths) died in hospital. In a multivariate analysis, living alone and the presence of one or more children at home were associated with death in hospital.ConclusionsMore than 40 % of cancer patients receiving end of life home hospitalization were not readmitted to hospital, reflecting the effectiveness of this type of palliative care setting. However, over half of the UHAs were due to an acute intercurrent event. Our results suggest that more efforts should be focused on anticipating these events at home – primarily via better upstream coordination between hospital physicians and family physicians.

International audience; Tradition oblige, les membres du comité de rédaction du Bulletin du Cancer vous font partager leur analyse des points marquants en cancérologie pour l’année passée : qu’a révélé l’an 2020 ? Que le lecteur nous en excuse par avance : nous ne parlerons pas de la COVID-19 ni de ses répercussions sur nos patients, sur leur prise en charge, sur les retards diagnostiques, sur les réorganisations hospitalières, etc. Par ailleurs, peut-être que certains points manquent ou, qu’à l’inverse, nous insistons un peu trop sur des thèmes que vous pourriez trouver anodins ou sans intérêt, mais l’exercice de synthèse n’est pas si simple. Même réalisé avec un peu de recul, il peut toujours être influencé par nos enthousiasmes immédiats. L’objectif reste d’assurer une lecture réfléchie, didactique et pratique

Administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) induces different patterns of response, including the classical complete or partial response and disease progression and new patterns such as h...

Background Since 2010, nationwide networks of reference centers for sarcomas (RREPS/NETSARC/RESOS) collected and prospectively reviewed all cases of sarcomas and connective tumors of intermediate malignancy (TIM) in France. Methods The nationwide incidence of sarcoma or TIM (2013–2016) was measured using the 2013 WHO classification and confirmed by a second independent review by expert pathologists. Simple clinical characteristics, yearly variations and correlation of incidence with published clinical trials are presented and analyzed. Results Over 150 different histological subtypes are reported from the 25172 patients with sarcomas (n = 18712, 74,3%) or TIM (n = 6460, 25.7%), with n = 5838, n = 6153, n = 6654, and n = 6527 yearly cases from 2013 to 2016. Over these 4 years, the yearly incidence of sarcomas and TIM was therefore 70.7 and 24.4 respectively, with a combined incidence of 95.1/106/year, higher than previously reported. GIST, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcomas, undifferentiated sarcomas represented 13%, 13%, 11% and 11% of tumors. Only GIST, as a single entity had a yearly incidence above 10/106/year. There were respectively 30, 64 and 66 different histological subtypes of sarcomas or TIM with an incidence ranging from 10 to 1/106, 1–0.1/106, or < 0.1/106/year respectively. The 2 latter incidence groups represented 21% of the patients with 130 histotypes. Published phase III and phase II clinical trials (p−6) are significantly higher with sarcomas subtypes with an incidence above 1/106 per. Conclusions This nationwide registry of sarcoma patients, with exhaustive histology review by sarcoma experts, shows that the incidence of sarcoma and TIM is higher than reported, and that tumors with a very low incidence (16/year) are less likely to be included in clinical trials.

Meningeal fibrous solitary tumors/hemangiopericytoma are rare and aggressive mesenchymal neoplasms considered as sarcomas. They represent less than 1% of intracranial tumors and derive from the pericytes of Zimmerman which permit capillary contraction. They tend to occur more often in males in the fifth decade. They are often revealed by intracranial hypertension. Some scannographic and MRI characteristics permit to distinguish meningeal fibrous solitary tumor/hemangiopericytoma from other meningeal tumors. Meningeal hemangiopericytoma and fibrous solitary tumors were considered as different entities until 2016. Following the discovery of an identical genetic event, the locus 12q13 chromosome inversion leading to a NAB2-STAT6 fusion with nuclear immunoreactivity for STAT6 protein, the 2016 WHO classification defines these tumors as a single entity. Meningeal fibrous solitary tumors/hemangiopericytoma have a high recurrence rate. Long-term recurrences may occur. Local relapses are more frequent than extracranial metastasis. A multimodal management is recommended to treat a localized disease. It involves a complete resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. When local recurrences occur, surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery permit sometimes a local control. Metastatic disease has a poor prognostic and a weak chimiosensitivity. Targeted therapies, like pazopanib, are a hopeful option.

Regorafenib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in pretreated patients with advanced non-adipocytic sarcoma (HR = 0.46, p &lt, 0.001) in a placebo-controlled, randomized, phase-II trial (NCT01900743). Thus, here, we assessed the prevalence of 57 biomarkers and their prognostic and predictive values for PFS and overall survival (OS). We analyzed 134/182 patients included in this trial, treated with regorafenib (n = 71, 53%) or placebo (n = 63, 47%). Mutational analyses were performed via full coding sequence analysis for 10 genes, and mutation hotspot panel for 50 genes (four genes in common). H19 was studied with RNA in-situ hybridization. The prognostic and predictive biomarkers&rsquo, values were studied only for biomarkers found positive/mutated in at least 10 patients. Overall, 25 out of 57 studied biomarkers, including five out of seven genes involved in angiogenesis, were found mutated/positive in at least one patient, of which 23 biomarkers had low prevalence (fewer than eight out of 134 patients), contrasting with H19 (n = 24, 18%), and TP53 (n = 35, 26%). However, in multivariable models of PFS and OS, including treatment effects and interactions, no significant prognostic or predictive values of the tested biomarkers were observed. Though several promising biomarkers were found to be positive/mutated, none of them were identified as viable predictive and prognostic biomarkers.

Hepatotoxicity is an important concern for nearly 40% of the patients treated with trabectedin for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS). The mechanisms underlying these liver damages have not yet been elucidated but they have been suggested to be related to the production of reactive metabolites. The aim of this pharmacogenetic study was to identify genetic variants of pharmacokinetic genes such as CYP450 and ABC drug transporters that could impair the trabectedin metabolism in hepatocytes. Sixty-three patients with ASTS from the TSAR clinical trial (NCT02672527) were genotyped by next-generation sequencing for 11 genes, and genotype&ndash, toxicity association analyses were performed with R package SNPassoc. Among the results, ABCC2 c.1249A allele (rs2273697) and ABCG2 intron variant c.-15994T (rs7699188) were associated with an increased risk of severe cytolysis, whereas ABCC2 c.3563A allele had a protective effect, as well as ABCB1 variants rs2032582 and rs1128503 (p-value &lt, 0.05). Furthermore, CYP3A5*1 rs776746 (c.6986A &gt, G) increased the risk of severe overall hepatotoxicity (p = 0.012, odds ratio (OR) = 5.75), suggesting the implication of metabolites in the hepatotoxicity. However, these results did not remain significant after multiple analysis correction. These findings need to be validated on larger cohorts of patients, with mechanistic studies potentially being able to validate the functional consequences of these variants.

Ramucirumab (anti-VEGFR2) plus pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) demonstrated promising antitumor activity and tolerability among patients with previously treated advanced cancers, supporting growing evidence that combination therapies modulating the tumor microenvironment may expand the spectrum of patients who respond to checkpoint inhibitors. Here we present the results of this combination in first-line patients with metastatic G/GEJ cancer. Twenty-eight patients (&ge, 18 years) with no prior systemic chemotherapy in the advanced/metastatic setting received ramucirumab (8 mg/kg days 1 and 8) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg day 1) every 3 weeks as part of JVDF phase 1a/b study. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Tumors were PD-L1-positive (combined positive score &ge, 1) in 19 and -negative in 6 patients. Eighteen patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, most commonly hypertension (14%) and elevated alanine/aspartate aminotransferase (11% each), with no grade 4 or 5 reported. The ORR was 25% (PD-L1-positive, 32%, PD-L1-negative, 17%) with duration of response not reached. PFS was 5.6 months (PD-L1-positive, 8.6 months, PD-L1-negative, 4.3 months), and OS 14.6 months (PD-L1-positive, 17.3 months, PD-L1-negative, 11.3 months). Acknowledging study design limitations, ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab had encouraging durable clinical activity with no unexpected toxicities in treatment-na&iuml, ve biomarker-unselected metastatic G/GEJ cancer, and improved outcomes in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors.

Background While the anti-PDGFRA antibody olaratumab failed to confirm an impact on survival in unselected advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients, the level of expression and the prognosis of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors and ligands in STS remain unclear. Patients and methods We analyzed PDGF ligands and receptors' expression levels in a series of 255 patients with different histologies of STS [gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS), sarcoma with complex genomics, synovial sarcoma (SyS)] with Agilent single-color micro-arrays. We explored expression levels as prognostic values in univariate and multivariate analysis using R software (version 3.4.2). Results Complex patterns of correlation of expression between ligands and receptors were observed for each histotype. PDGFA levels were highest in SyS and lowest in MLPS (P < 4 × 10−9), PDGFB and C levels were lower in GIST (P < 2 × 10−15 and P < 3 × 10−9) while PDGFD expression was similar across histological subtypes. PDGF receptor (PDGFR) A expression was lowest in MLPS (P < 0.002), whereas PDGFRB and L expressions were lowest in GIST and SyS (P < 0.0004). Interestingly, high PDGFA expression levels were associated with higher risk of metastasis (P = 0.006), whereas PDGFD levels above average were associated with a reduced risk of metastasis (P = 0.01) in univariate and multivariate analysis. Conclusions The expression of PDGF ligands and receptors varies across sarcoma histological subtypes. PDGFA and D expression levels independently and inversely correlate with the risk of metastatic relapse., Highlights • The expression of PDGF ligands and receptors substantially varies across sarcoma histological subtypes. • PDGFA and D expression levels independently and inversely correlate with the risk of metastatic relapse. • The differential expression of ligands might be used as biomarker of efficacy for PDGFRα antibodies in STS.

We reviewed all fully published clinical trials assessing anti-angiogenic agents in sarcoma patients (last issue, January 13, 2020). Anti-angiogenic macromolecules (e.g., bevacizumab or ombrabulin) provide disappointing results. Many multikinase inhibitors have been assessed with non-randomized phase II trials with limited samples and without stratification according to histological subtypes, therefore interpretation of such trials is very challenging. On the contrary, pazopanib, regorafenib, and sorafenib have been assessed using double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase II or phase III trials. Compared to placebo, sorafenib demonstrates activity in desmoid-type fibromatosis patients. Based on results of phase 3 trial, pazopanib had obtained approval for treatment of pretreated non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma. Regorafenib is currently assessed in several clinical settings and provides significant improvement of progression-free survival in pre-treated non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma and in advanced pretreated osteosarcoma. Multikinase inhibitors are a breakthrough in sarcoma management. Many trials are ongoing. Nevertheless, predictive factors are still missing.

Introduction Data of first-line ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab treatment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)–positive NSCLC (cohort E) are reported (NCT02443324). Methods In this multicenter, open-label phase 1a/b trial, patients received ramucirumab 10 mg/kg and pembrolizumab 200 mg every 21 days for up to 35 cycles. PD-L1 positivity was defined as tumor proportion score (TPS) greater than or equal to 1%. Exploratory NanoString biomarker analyses included three T-cell signatures (T-cell–inflamed, Gajewski, and effector T cells) and CD274 gene expression. Results Cohort E included 26 patients. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 22 patients (84.6%). Treatment-related adverse events of grade greater than or equal to 3 were reported in 11 patients (42.3%); the most frequent was hypertension (n = 4, 15.4%). Objective response rate was 42.3% in the treated population and 56.3% and 22.2% for patients with high (TPS ≥ 50%) and lower levels (TPS 1%–49%) of PD-L1 expression, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the treated population was 9.3 months, and 12-month and 18-month PFS rates were 45% each. Median PFS was not reached in patients with PD-L1 TPS greater than or equal to 50% and was 4.2 months in patients with PD-L1 TPS 1% to 49%. Median overall survival was not reached in the treated population, and 12-month and 18-month overall survival rates were 73% and 64%, respectively. Biomarker data suggested a positive association among clinical response, three T-cell signatures, CD274 gene expression, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. Conclusions First-line therapy with ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab has a manageable safety profile in patients with NSCLC, and the efficacy signal seems to be strongest in tumors with high PD-L1 expression.

We summarize herein the literature data about molecular targeted therapies in sarcomas and conjunctive tissue intermediate malignancies. For each clinical setting, the level of evidence, the mechanism of action and the target are described. The two major axes include (i) identification of subgroups of tumors with druggable alteration irrespective of the histological diagnosis (e.g. NTRK), and (ii) druggable target of pathway related to the physiopathology of the tumor: denosumab and bone giant cell tumor, imatinib and soft tissue giant cell tumor, mTOR inhibitor and PECOMA.

Osimertinib is a third‐generation, irreversible, oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that potently and selectively inhibits both EGFR‐TKI sensitizing and EGFR T790M and has demonstrated efficacy in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) central nervous system metastases. In this phase I study, we assessed the effects of normal renal function (NRF) and severe renal impairment (SRI) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of osimertinib in patients with solid tumors. Part A: patients with NRF (creatinine clearance [CrCL] ≥90 mL/min), and SRI, (CrCL