Search

International audience; BACKGROUND:Rituximab plus chemotherapy has been shown to be effective in patients with advanced-stage, previously untreated follicular lymphoma; nevertheless, most patients will have a relapse. Combination immunotherapy with lenalidomide and rituximab is an immunomodulatory regimen that has shown promising activity in patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.METHODS:We conducted this multicenter, international, phase 3 superiority trial to evaluate rituximab plus lenalidomide, as compared with rituximab plus chemotherapy, in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the two regimens, followed by maintenance monotherapy with rituximab. Treatment with rituximab plus lenalidomide consisted of 18 cycles of the two drugs, followed by rituximab maintenance therapy every 8 weeks for 12 cycles (six additional doses). Treatment with rituximab plus chemotherapy consisted of the investigator's choice of one of three rituximab-based regimens, followed by maintenance monotherapy with rituximab every 8 weeks for 12 cycles. The primary end points were complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) at 120 weeks and progression-free survival.RESULTS:A total of 1030 patients were randomly assigned to receive rituximab plus lenalidomide (513 patients) or rituximab plus chemotherapy (517 patients). The rate of confirmed or unconfirmed complete response at 120 weeks was similar in the two groups: 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44 to 53) in the rituximab-lenalidomide group and 53% (95% CI, 49 to 57) in the rituximab-chemotherapy group (P=0.13). The interim 3-year rate of progression-free survival was 77% (95% CI, 72 to 80) and 78% (95% CI, 74 to 82), respectively. A higher percentage of patients in the rituximab-chemotherapy group had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (32% vs. 50%) and febrile neutropenia of any grade (2% vs. 7%), and a higher percentage of patients in the rituximab-lenalidomide group had grade 3 or 4 cutaneous reactions (7% vs. 1%).CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma, efficacy results were similar with rituximab plus lenalidomide and rituximab plus chemotherapy (with both regimens followed by rituximab maintenance therapy). The safety profile differed in the two groups. (Funded by Celgene; RELEVANCE ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01476787 and NCT01650701 , and EudraCT number, 2011-002792-42 .).

7517 Background: The Phase 3 ALCANZA study showed significant, durable responses with CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate BV vs PC of methotrexate (MTX) or bexarotene (Bex) for CD30-positive (CD30+) cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL). Uniform CD30 expression is characteristic of primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (pcALCL), but is variable among other subtypes including mycosis fungoides (MF). We examined activity of BV and MTX / Bex by CD30 expression in pts treated on the ALCANZA study. Methods: Adults with previously treated CD30+ MF or pcALCL were enrolled. MF pts had ≥2 skin biopsies from separate lesions, pcALCL had ≥1. Patients were scored CD30+ if ≥1 biopsy had ≥10% CD30+ lymphoid cells using an investigational Ventana diagnostic test, centrally assessed by one pathologist. We compared the proportion of MF subgroup pts (n=50 per treatment arm) with objective response lasting ≥4 months (ORR4; ALCANZA primary endpoint) and PFS in pts with all biopsies ≥10% CD30+ (CD30min ≥10%) vs ≥1 biopsy min min ≥10% vs min min 20%, 76% vs 7%, respectively). Conclusions: Notable inter-patient or inter-lesional variability in CD30 expression was seen in MF pts. Highly superior ORR4 and PFS endpoints were seen with BV over PC regardless of CD30min expression level. Clinical trial information: NCT01578499. [Table: see text]

The clinical value of imaging is well established for the follow-up of many lymphoid malignancies but not for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). A meta-analysis was performed with the dataset of 3 German CLL Study Group phase 3 trials (CLL4, CLL5, and CLL8) that included 1372 patients receiving first-line therapy for CLL. Response as well as progression during follow-up was reassessed according to the National Cancer Institute Working Group1996 criteria. A total of 481 events were counted as progressive disease during treatment or follow-up. Of these, 372 progressions (77%) were detected by clinical symptoms or blood counts. Computed tomography (CT) scans or ultrasound were relevant in 44 and 29 cases (9% and 6%), respectively. The decision for relapse treatment was determined by CT scan or ultrasound results in only 2 of 176 patients (1%). CT scan results had an impact on the prognosis of patients in complete remission only after the administration of conventional chemotherapy but not after chemoimmunotherapy. In conclusion, physical examination and blood count remain the methods of choice for staging and clinical follow-up of patients with CLL as recommended by the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 2008 guidelines. These trials are registered at http://www.isrctn.org as ISRCTN 75653261 and ISRCTN 36294212 and at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00281918.

Extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas constitute 20-25% of overall non-Hodgkin's lymphomas cases and can be managed with very different therapeutic strategies. Therefore, the Italian Society of Hematology and the two affiliate societies (the Italian Society of Experimental Hematology and the Italian Group of Bone Marrow Transplantation) appointed a panel of experts to produce clinical practice-guidelines for the management of these conditions. Primary lung and mediastinal lymphomas were the objective of this part of the project. The panel of experts produced the following key recommendations that were graded according to the strength of evidence and clinical judgement. The first-line therapy for non-MALT primary lung non-Hodgkin's lymphomas should include anthracycline-based chemotherapy with CHOP or CHOP-like, MACOP-B or MACOP-B-like regimens (grade D). Rituximab association with chemotherapy needs to be evaluated within approved clinical trials. Second-line therapy with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation is recommended (grade B). In patients with MALT primary lung non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, the recommended first-line therapy should include chlorambucil, CHOP, CHOP-like or fludarabine-containing regimens (grade B). Radiotherapy is to be reserved for patients with a unique, small lesion in a poorly mobile site and with contraindication to surgery (grade D). Rituximab should be administered only within approved clinical trials. For treatment of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphomas, the recommended first-line therapy is a chemotherapy and radiotherapy association (grade B). An anthracycline-based chemotherapy with CHOP, MACOP-B or VACOP-B is recommended (grade B). Rituximab combination with chemotherapy is highly suggested but only for patients enrolled into approved clinical trials. Patients with an inadequate early response should be candidates for early intensification with high-dose chemotherapy (grade C). Patients with refractory or relapsed disease should undergo rescue programs including intensive, non-cross-resistant debulking treatment followed, in chemosensitive patients, by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (grade B).

Introduction: Immune checkpoint blockade of programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor and its ligand (PD-L1) has contributed to efficacy in many tumor types, with clinical responses observed in a proportion of patients (pts) with Hodgkin lymphoma and rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes. A recent study demonstrated that combination treatment with anti-PD-L1 and anti-CD38 agents contributed to a stronger anti-tumor immune response compared with anti-PD-L1 monotherapy. Isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, is approved for use in multiple myeloma. Cemiplimab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, is approved for use in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: This Phase 1/2 open-label study (NCT03769181) was designed to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of isatuximab in combination with cemiplimab (Isa+Cemi) in pts with relapsed and refractory classic Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). The primary objectives of Phase 1 were to characterize the safety and tolerability of Isa+Cemi and to confirm the recommended Phase 2 dose. Phase 2 used a Simon's 2-stage design to assess the complete response rate in Cohort A1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 naïve cHL; n=18; median age, 36 years; 55.6% male; ≥2 prior regimens, 100%) and to assess the objective response rate in Cohorts A2 (cHL progressing after PD-1/PD-L1 therapy; n=12; median age, 33 years; 58.3% male; ≥2 prior regimens, 100%), B (DLBCL; n=17; median age, 64 years; 70.6% male; ≥2 prior regimens, 100%), and C (PTCL; n=11; median age, 69 years; 63.6% male; ≥2 prior regimens, 9.1%). Pts received Isa+Cemi for up to 96 weeks. In Phase 1, the isatuximab dose was 10 mg/kg every week (Cycle 1), every 2 weeks (Cycle 2-6), or every 3 weeks (Cycle 7+). The cemiplimab dose was 250 mg every 2 weeks (Cycle 1-6) or 350 mg every 3 weeks (Cycle 7+). An interim analysis was performed when the last pt in Phase 2 was followed up for 24 weeks. The efficacy evaluation was based on Simon's 2-stage design with 85% power at a 5% 1-sided alpha level for each cohort. At least 8 (44.4%) and 3 (30.0%) responses were required in Cohorts B and C, respectively, in Phase 2 Stage 1 to advance to Phase 2 Stage 2. Results: Isa+Cemi demonstrated a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, confirming the recommended Phase 2 dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 83.3% (Cohort A1) and 100% (Cohorts A2, B, C) of pts. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 5.6%, 8.3%, 70.6%, and 81.8% of pts in Cohorts A1, A2, B, and C, respectively. There were no pts in Cohorts A1 or A2 who reported TEAEs leading to definitive discontinuation; 5.9% and 27.3% of pts in Cohorts B and C experienced TEAEs leading to definitive discontinuation. No Grade 5 TEAEs with fatal outcome were reported in Cohorts A1 or A2. There were 4 deaths reported during the on-treatment period in Cohort B (progressive disease, n=2; intestinal perforation, n=1; urinary tract infection, n=1) and 2 in Cohort C (unknown, n=1; progressive disease, n=1). Infusion reactions were reported in 38.9%, 75.0%, 52.9%, and 72.7% of pts in Cohorts A1, A2, B, and C, respectively; there was 1 (9.1%) Grade ≥3 infusion reaction reported in Cohort C. Pharmacokinetics (PK) analyses suggested no effect of cemiplimab on isatuximab PK, and vice versa. Based on Lugano 2014 criteria, 55.6% (Cohort A1), 33.3% (Cohort A2), 5.9% (Cohort B), and 9.1% (Cohort C) of pts in the all-treated population achieved a complete or partial response. Median progression-free survival was 8.38 months (95% CI: 2.72-not calculable [NC]), 8.28 months (95% CI: 2.6-NC), 2.37 months (95% CI: 0.46-2.69), and 2.66 months (95% CI: 0.43-2.99) in Cohorts A1, A2, B, and C, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, Isa+Cemi had a manageable safety profile. Clinical efficacy was observed in pts with cHL, with increased responses observed in pts who had not previously received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy compared with those who progressed on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. For Cohorts B (DLBCL) and C (PTCL), results of the interim efficacy analysis did not meet prespecified criteria to continue enrollment in Phase 2 Stage 2. Most pts with DLBCL were primary refractory/bulky and discontinued rapidly, which may have contributed to the lack of activity with this combination. Disclosures Carlo-Stella: ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Zinzani: TG Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ImmuneDesign: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Sureda: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; Bluebird: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Casasnovas: TAKEDA: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; ROCHE: Consultancy, Research Funding. Carpio: Regeneron, TAKEDA, Celgene, Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travels and accommodation. Bouabdallah: Abbvie: Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses. Cartron: Roche, Celgene-BMS: Consultancy; Danofi, Gilead, Novartis, Jansen, Roche, Celgene-BMS, Abbvie, Takeda: Honoraria. Kim: Celltrion: Research Funding; Dong-A Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Cordoba: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ADCTherapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Koh: Pfizer: Consultancy; Jassen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Alves: Janssen, Cilag, Gilead, Takeda, Astrazeneca, Roche, Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Chamuleau: Gilead: Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lopez-Guillermo: Roche, Gilead/Kite, Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, AbbVie, Spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Van Der Poel: Roche, Janssen, Abbvie: Honoraria. Abbadessa: Sanofi: Current Employment. Meng: Sanofi: Current Employment. Ji: Sanofi: Current Employment. Lepine: Sanofi: Other: Contractual relationship. Saleem: Sanofi: Current Employment. Ribrag: PharmaMar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Research Funding; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argen-X: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Based on the Phase III ICARIA-MM study, isatuximab (Sarclisa) is approved in a number of countries in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. Based on the Phase III IKEMA study, isatuximab in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone is approved in the United States for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one to three prior lines of therapy, and in the European Union for the treatment of adult patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy. Cemiplimab (Libtayo) is an anti-PD-1 antibody approved for the treatment of the following: 1) patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma who are not candidates for curative surgery or curative radiation; 2) patients with locally advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma previously treated with a hedgehog pathway inhibitor or for whom a hedgehog pathway inhibitor is not appropriate; and 3) patients with NSCLC and high tumor PD-L1 expression as determined by an FDA-approved test, with no EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 aberrations, and is locally advanced where patients are not candidates for surgical resection or definitive chemoradiation or metastatic.

Clinical trial results indicate that brentuximab vedotin brings considerable promise for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on 65 heavily pretreated patients who underwent therapy through a Named Patient Program in Italy (non trial-setting). The primary study endpoint was the objective response rate; secondary endpoints were safety, overall survival and progression-free survival. The best overall response rate (70.7%), including 21.5% complete responses, was observed at the first restaging after the third cycle of treatment. After a median follow up of 13.2 months, the overall survival rate at 20 months was 73.8% while the progression-free survival rate at 20 months was 24.2%. Globally nine patients are in continuous complete response with a median follow up of 14 months (range, 10–19 months). Four patients proceeded to autotransplantation and nine to allotransplantation. The most frequent extra-hematologic toxicity was peripheral neuropathy, observed in 21.5% of cases (9 patients with grade 1/2 and 5 patients with grade 3/4); neurological toxicity led to discontinuation of treatment in three patients and to dose reduction in four. In general the treatment was well tolerated and toxicities, both hematologic and extra-hematologic, were manageable. This report indicates and confirms that brentuximab vedotin as a single agent is effective and safe also when used in standard, everyday clinical practice outside a clinical trial. Best overall responses were recorded after three or four cycles and showed that brentuximab vedotin provides an effective bridge to further therapeutic interventions.

Myeloid sarcoma ( MS) is a rare neoplasm whose knowledge is largely based on case reports and/or technically dated contributions. Ninety-two MSs in adulthood with clinical data available were evaluated both morphologically and immunohistochemically. Seventy-four cases were also studied by fluorescent in situ hybridization on tissue sections and/or conventional karyotyping on bone marrow or peripheral blood. Histologically, 50% of the tumors were of the blastic type, 43.5% either monoblastic or myelomonocytic and 6.5% corresponded to different histotypes. CD68/KP1 was the most commonly expressed marker (100%), followed by myeloperoxidase (83.6%), CD117 (80.4%), CD99 (54.3%), CD68/PG-M1 (51%), CD34 (43.4%), terminal-deoxy-nucleotidyl-transferase (31.5%), CD56 (13%), CD61/linker for activation of T cells (2.2%), CD30 ( 2.2%) and CD4 (1.1%). Foci of plasmacytoid monocyte differentiation were observed in intestinal cases carrying inv16. Chromosomal aberrations were detected in about 54% of cases: monosomy 7(10.8%), trisomy 8(10.4%) and mixed lineage leukemia-splitting (8.5%) were the commonest abnormalities, whereas t(8; 21) was rare ( 2.2%). The behavior was dramatic irrespective of presentation, age, sex, phenotype and cytogenetics. Most if not all, long survivors received bone-marrow transplantation. The present report expands the spectrum of our knowledge showing that MS has frequent monoblastic/myelomonocytic differentiation, displays distinctive phenotypic profile, carries chromosomal aberrations other than t( 8; 21), and requires supra-maximal therapy.

By real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR), we evaluated BCL2/IgH(+) cells in the bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) from 86 patients with follicular lymphoma treated with the sequential administration of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and rituximab. At diagnosis, the amount of BCL2/IgH(+) cells in the BM was low (1 BCL2/IgH(+) cell in 1000-100 000 normal cells) in 43% of patients, intermediate (1 in 100-1000) in 34%, and high (> 1 in 100) in 23%. A 2 log decrease of BCL2/IgH(+) cells was achieved after CHOP and an additional 2 log reduction following rituximab. By multivariate analysis, a low level of BCL2/IgH(+) cells in the BM at diagnosis was the best predictor for the achievement of a complete clinical and molecular response. At 5 years, the event-free survival rates of patients with a low/intermediate or high tumor infiltration in the BM were 59% and 32%, respectively. The freedom from recurrence of patients who achieved a molecular response in the BM, no matter whether after CHOP alone or CHOP and rituximab, was 64% as compared to 32% for patients who did not (P < .006). RQ-PCR performed at presentation on BM samples predicts treatment response and long-term clinical outcome in patients with follicular lymphoma.

Simple Summary CAR T-cell therapies have undoubtedly revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. These therapies represent a valuable new treatment option, yielding impressive complete remission rates and improving survival. The aim of this article is to give an overview of emerging real-world evidence since data from every-day clinical practice are still scarce. We report effectiveness and safety data on 30 patients treated at our Institution. Treatment in this setting with CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapies for relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma showed a manageable safety profile and high objective response rate, confirming the encouraging results of the pivotal clinical trials. Abstract Large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) are the most common types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Although outcomes have improved thanks to the introduction of rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy, certain LBCL still represents a challenge because of initial resistance to therapy or recurrent relapses. Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are second-generation autologous CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies approved for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) LBCL, based on the results of phase II pivotal single-arm trials ZUMA-1 (for axi-cel) and JULIET (for tisa-cel). Here, we report patients outcomes with axi-cel and tisa-cel in the standard of care (SoC) setting for R/R LBCL, treated at our Institution. Data were collected from patients who underwent leukapheresis between August 2019 and February 2021. Toxicities were graded and managed according to the institution’s guidelines. Responses were assessed as per Lugano 2014 classification. Of the 30 patients who underwent leukapheresis, 18 (60%) received axi-cel, while 12 (40%) tisa-cel. Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 10% and 16% patients, respectively. Best objective and complete response rates were 73.3% and 40%, respectively. Treatment in SoC setting with CD19 CAR T-cell therapies for R/R LBCL showed a manageable safety profile and high objective response rate.

Purpose: To evaluate the role of F-18-Fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT in lymphoma patients with suspected recurrent or residual disease. Methods: Adult lymphoma patients presenting with positive or equivocal F-18-FDG PET/CT at end-treatment or follow-up were prospectively addressed to an additional F-18-FLT-PET/CT. SUV max and tumour-to-background ratios (TBRs) were recorded for the most avid lesion. Biopsy or, when not available, clinical or imaging assessment were employed as standard of reference. Results: Overall 52 patients were recruited. Histology was available in 20/52 patients (38%), proliferation-index (Ki-67) in 14/20. Disease was excluded in 13/52 patients (25%) (one reactive follicular hyperplasia, five reactive-inflammatory tissues, four reactive nodes, two nodal sarcoid-like and one non-specific peri-caecal finding). FDG and FLT scans were concordant in disease restaging in 34/52 patients (65%), whereas in 18/52 cases (35%) relevant discrepancies were recorded. SUV max and TBR were significantly higher in the disease versus the disease-free group, with both tracers (p = 0.0231 and 0.0219 for FDG; p = 0.0008 and 0.0016 for FLT). FLT-SUVmax demonstrated slightly better performance in discriminating benign from malignant lesions (ROC-AUC: 0.8116 and 0.7949 for FLT-SUV max and TBR; 0.7120 and 0.7140 for FDG). Optimal FLT-SUV max cut-offs were searched: three would lead to 95% sensitivity, 81% accuracy, and 39% specificity, whereas seven led to 100%, 41%, and 56% respectively. No statistically significant correlation was observed between the two FLT indices and Ki-67. Conclusions: According to our results in a clinical setting of recurrent or residual lymphoma, FLT is not significantly superior to FDG and it is unlikely that it will be employed independently. FLT may be restricted to a few specific cases, as complementary to standard FDG imaging, to confirm a diagnosis or to define a better target to biopsy. However, due to FLT suboptimal performance, many findings would remain inconclusive, requiring further diagnostic procedures and reducing the effectiveness of performing an additional FLT scan.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of rare diseases with an aggressive behavior and dismal prognosis. Their classification is complex and still evolving, and several biomolecular markers now help refine the prognosis of specific disease entities, although still have limited impact in tailoring the treatment. First-line treatment strategies can cure only a minority of patients and relapsed-refractory disease still represents the major cause of failure. Frontline autologous transplantation may have an impact in the consolidation of response; however, its role is still questioned as far as complete responses obtained after induction chemotherapy are concerned. Newer drugs are now being evaluated in clinical trials, but effective salvage strategies for those who experience treatment failures are lacking. Here we review and discuss the most controversial aspects of diagnosis and treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphomas.

No abstract available.

Copanlisib, an intravenously administered agent with inhibitory activity that predominantly targets the alpha and delta isoforms of phosphoinositol 3-kinase, was granted accelerated approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration on the basis of its activity in the third-line treatment of follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Copanlisib is associated with several potentially serious adverse conditions, some of which are not shared with other phosphoinositol 3-kinase inhibitors (ie, infusion-related hyperglycemia and hypertension). Education and guidance are needed to help physicians manage adverse effects associated with copanlisib treatment. Therefore, this panel developed recommendations and guidance for the optimal management of adverse events associated with copanlisib treatment in patients with follicular lymphoma. Introduction: Copanlisib is a phosphoinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor approved for the third-line treatment of follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Although the drug is generally well-tolerated, it can be associated with several unique and potentially serious adverse effects (AEs). Two of the most common toxicities not seen with other PI3K inhibitors include hyperglycemia and hypertension, which primarily occur during infusion and resolve shortly thereafter, and likely relate to targeting the PI3K alpha isoform. Other toxicities less commonly observed with copanlisib than with other approved drugs in this class include non-infectious pneumonitis, infections, diarrhea and colitis, and hep-atobiliary toxicity. Materials and Methods: A panel composed of experts in lymphoma, diabetes, and hypertension convened to develop guidance pertaining to the administration of copanlisib and the management of the AEs associated with copanlisib treatment. Results: Recommendations were formulated pertaining to the management of AEs associated with copanlisib treatment, particularly infusion-related hyperglycemia and hypertension, noninfectious pneumonitis, infections, diarrhea, and colitis. The recommendations herein reflect the consensus of the members of this panel, all of whom contributed to these suggested approaches to patient supportive care. Conclusion: There are a number of challenges associated with the use of copanlisib. Infusion-related hypertension and hyperglycemia occur frequently, although they are transient, reversible, and rarely of clinical significance; this report provides guidance as to their management.

No abstract available.

Background: Veno-Occlusive Disease (VOD) or Sinusoidal Obstruction syndrome (SOS), is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication after Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation (HSCT). The clinical diagnosis of VOD relies on signs and symptoms, such as weight gain, painful hepatomegaly and jaundice, directly correlated to the development of sinusoidal portal hypertension (PH). It has been demonstrated that the earlier is the treatment start better the outcome. For this reason, non-invasive diagnostic tools of VOD/SOS diagnosis are needed. Ultrasound (US) Elastography techniques, assessing the Liver Stiffness Measurements (LSM), have been demonstrated to be able to assess PH degree. The role of LSM in VOD/SOS has not yet been reported in the setting of adult HSCT. Methods: We report the results of a prospective single center study evaluating the role of LSM assessed by Transient Elastography (TE), in adult patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT for haematological malignancies since April 2016 at the Institute of Hematology "L. and A. Seràgnoli", Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy. The exclusion criteria were patients with Body Mass Index (BMI) over 40 kg/m2, ascites and diagnosis of advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) at pre-HSCT assessment. LSM were assessed bedside of patients by TE, using the FibroScan® apparatus with "M" probe (Echosens, Paris, France), after overnight fasting and after a complete abdominal US exam, before the start of conditioning regimen and then at 3 time points after transplant (on days +9/10, +15/17 and +22/24). Results: Over the study period, among of 89 patients referred to our centre 78 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median age was 54 years (40-60). The most frequent indication was Acute Myeloid Leukemia (44.9%). 66.7% of patients received a myeloablative conditioning while 33.3% received a RIC regimen. 15.4% were transplanted from HLA identical sibling donor, 74.4% from unrelated donor, 3.8% from Haplo and 6.4% from Cord Blood. The baseline median LSM was 4.2 kPa (3.8-5.3). During the study, 4 out 78 patients (5.1%) met clinical diagnostic criteria of VOD/SOS. The median day of VOD/SOS diagnosis was +17 (+1 - +29). Most of the VOD/SOS were Severe/Very severe (3/4), one of them leading to Multiple Organ Failure and death. Accordingly with EBMT criteria, the total number of pre-HSCT VOD/SOS risk factor was significantly higher in patients who developed VOD/SOS. We also valuated the US signs, according to Lassau criteria, in patients with VOD/SOS: 3 out 4 patients had ≥3 Grey-scale US morphologic Criteria and none presented ≥3 US Colour Doppler Criteria. Only portal vein diameter >12 mm was presented in all patients with VOD/SOS diagnosis. LSM values for each time points were reported in Figure 1; LSM by TE showed increased values in all patients who developed VOD/SOS (red continuous lines). Pre-HSCT (T0) LSM tended to be slight (p-value 0.079) higher (6.9 kPa vs 4.2 kPa) in patients who developed VOD/SOS. In these patients, the LS values increased before VOD/SOS clinical diagnosis, with values significantly different from pre-HSCT and from the previous assessments, anticipating from 2 to 12 days the clinical VOD/SOS development. After starting VOD/SOS specific treatment (defibrotide and diuretics) LSM values consensually decreased to pre-transplant values within 2-4 weeks. In univariate analysis an LSM increase after HSCT was significantly associated with VOD/SOS development (OR: 1.837; 95%CI [1.1107- 3.0384], p Interpretation: LSM by TE showed significantly increased values in all patients who developed VOD/SOS, anticipating by some days the clinical criteria for VOD/SOS diagnosis. By our knowledge this is the first prospective study focused on the use of LSM for early prediction of VOD/SOS. Further validation of these data are warranted to confirm the diagnostic role and the predictive value of LSM in the VOD/SOS development. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Zinzani: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SERVIER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Cavo:GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background Primary breast lymphoma (PBL) of low-grade histology is a rare disease. This multicentric retrospective study was carried out to determine clinical features, prognosis and relapse. Patients and methods Patients with histologically proven, previously untreated follicular or marginal-zone PBL (MZL PBL) diagnosed from 1980 to 2003 were included in the study. Major end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and potential prognostic factors. Results We collected data on 60 cases of PBL [36 follicular and 24 marginal-zone lymphoma (MZL)]. Stage was IE or IIE in 57 patients and IVE in three patients due to bilateral breast involvement. Surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT), alone or in combination, were used as first-line treatments in 67%, 42% and 52% of patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 98%, with a 93% complete response rate. Five-year PFS were 56% for MZL and 49% for follicular PBL (P = 0.62). Relapses were mostly in distant sites (18 of 23 cases); no patients relapsed within RT fields. Conclusions Our data showed an indolent behaviour of MZL PBL, comparable to other primary extranodal MZL. Conversely, patients with follicular PBL had inferior PFS and OS when compared with limited-stage nodal follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, suggesting an adverse prognostic role of primary breast localisation in this histological subgroup.

No abstract available.

Purpose: Identify subgroups of patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma deriving substantial progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with bortezomib–rituximab versus rituximab in the phase III LYM-3001 study. Experimental Design: A total of 676 patients were randomized to five 5-week cycles of bortezomib–rituximab or rituximab. The primary end point was PFS; this prespecified analysis of candidate protein biomarkers and genes was an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and whole blood samples were collected at baseline. Immunohistochemistry and genetic analyses were completed for 4 proteins and 8 genes. Results: In initial pairwise analyses, using individual single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes, one biomarker pair (PSMB1 P11A C/G heterozygote, low CD68 expression) was associated with a significant PFS benefit with bortezomib–rituximab versus rituximab, controlling for multiple comparison corrections. The pair was analyzed under dominant, recessive, and additive genetic models, with significant association with PFS seen under the dominant model (G/G+C/G). In patients carrying this biomarker pair [PSMB1 P11A G allele, low CD68 expression (≤50 CD68-positive cells), population frequency: 43.6%], median PFS was 14.2 months with bortezomib–rituximab versus 9.1 months with rituximab (HR 0.47, P < 0.0001), and there was a significant overall survival benefit (HR 0.49, P = 0.0461). Response rates were higher and time to next antilymphoma therapy was longer in the bortezomib–rituximab group. In biomarker-negative patients, no significant efficacy differences were seen between treatment groups. Similar proportions of patients had high-risk features in the biomarker-positive and biomarker-negative subsets. Conclusions: Patients with PSMB1 P11A (G allele) and low CD68 expression seemed to have significantly longer PFS and greater clinical benefit with bortezomib–rituximab versus rituximab. Clin Cancer Res; 19(9); 2551–61. ©2013 AACR.

no abstract

Purpose Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) has no standard of care for patients who are relapsed or refractory to autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). This phase II study examined safety and activity of panobinostat in this population. Patients and Methods Panobinostat 40 mg was administered orally three times per week. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) based on investigator assessment of radiologic imaging. Secondary end points included ORR by independent central review, time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Exploratory biomarker analyses were performed. Results The 129 treated patients (median age, 32 years; range, 18 to 75 years) were heavily pretreated with a median of four (range, two to seven) prior systemic regimens, and 41% did not respond to the regimen immediately preceding panobinostat. Tumor reductions occurred in 96 patients (74%). Objective response was achieved by 35 patients (27%), including 30 (23%) partial responses and five (4%) complete responses. The median TTR was 2.3 months, median DOR was 6.9 months, and median PFS was 6.1 months. The estimated 1-year overall survival rate was 78%. Common nonhematologic adverse events (AEs)—diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue—were generally grade 1 and 2. Most common grade 3 and 4 hematologic AEs—thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia—were manageable. Early reductions in thymus and activation-regulated chemokine were observed in patients achieving complete or partial response. Conclusion In the largest, prospective, multicenter, international trial conducted in heavily pretreated patients with HL who relapsed or were refractory to ASCT, panobinostat monotherapy demonstrated antitumor activity, resulting in durable responses.

Aims Peripheral T cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL/NOS) is the commonest PTCL subtype. Recently, proliferation pathways have been found to be commonly altered in PTCL/NOS. CDKN1B/p27, a critical regulator of cell cycle and proliferation, has been suggested to be involved in T cell lymphomagenesis. This study aimed to evaluate the possible occurrence of CDKN1B/p27 aberrations in PTCL/NOS. Methods CDKN1B/p27 expression at RNA and protein level by DNA and tissue microarrays, in 28 and 98 cases, respectively, was studied. Additionally, direct sequencing of CDKN1B in 81 PTCL/NOS was performed. Results CDKN1B mRNA was similarly expressed in PTCL/NOS and normal T lymphocytes. In addition, structural abnormalities were not found; these included mutations and deletions in any exons, exon–intron junctions or regulatory regions. Furthermore, physiological expression of p27 in neoplastic cells was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry; this was mutually exclusive with Ki-67, as expected when the system is intact. Consistently, the expression of other molecules that are functionally related to CDKN1B/p27 in controlling cell cycle (including CCNE1) did not appear to be affected at either the mRNA or protein level. Finally, it was found that p27 expression was not significantly related with overall survival. Conclusion CDKN1B/p27 aberrations seem to be uncommon in PTCL/NOS pathogenesis.

Background Peripheral T-cell lymphoma unspecified (PTCLU) and mycosis fungoides (MF) often show resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Gemcitabine should be considered a suitable option. We report the long-term update of 39 pretreated T-cell lymphoma patients treated with gemcitabine. Patients and methods From May 1997 to September 2007, 39 pretreated MF and PTCLU patients received gemcitabine. Inclusion criteria were as follows: histologic diagnosis of MF or PTCLU; relapsed/refractory disease; age ≥18 years; and World Health Organization performance status of two or less. Nineteen patients had MF and 20 PTCLU. All patients with MF had a T3–T4, N0, and M0 disease and patients with PTCLU had stage III–IV disease. Gemcitabine was given on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day schedule (1200 mg/m2/day) for a total of three to six cycles. Results Overall response rate was 51% (20 of 39 patients); complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were 23% (9 of 39 patients) and 28% (11 of 39 patients), respectively. Patients with MF had a CR rate of 16% and a PR rate of 32% compared with a CR rate of 30% and a PR rate of 25% of PTCLU patients. Among the CR patients, 7 of 9 are in continuous complete response with a variable disease-free interval (15–120 months). Conclusion In our experience, gemcitabine proved to be effective in pretreated MF and PTCLU patients, even in the long term.

The use of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) has become an integral part of supportive care during cytotoxic chemotherapy. Current guidelines recommend the use of G-CSF in patients with substantial risk of febrile neutropenia. However, little consensus exists about optimal timing and tailoring of this therapy. Based on the known effects of chemotherapy and G-CSF on bone marrow compartments, we propose a model that supports the prophylactic rather than therapeutic use of G-CSF therapy. In addition, several genetic alterations in G-CSF signalling pathway have been described. These genetic variants may predict the risk of febrile neutropenia and response to G-CSF. Thus, future pharmacogenetic/omics studies in this field are warranted. Through the identification of patients at risk and the knowledge of biological basis for optimal timing, hopefully we should soon be able to improve the application of the existing guidelines for G-CSF therapy and patient's prognosis.

BACKGROUND. Limited data exist about the role of second-line chemotherapy response assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) as a prognostic factor in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The objective of this analysis was to investigate the main determinants of prognosis in patients with aggressive B-cell NHL who undergo ASCT, focusing on the impact of pretransplantation PET, secondary age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (sAA-IPI) score, histology, and previous response to first-line chemotherapy. METHODS. Seventy-five patients with diffuse, large B-cell lymphoma or grade 3 follicular lymphoma who were treated at the author' institution with second-line chemotherapy (combined ifosfamide, etoposide, and epirubicin [IEV]) followed by ASCT between September 2002 and September 2006 were included. All patients were evaluated by PET after 1 to 3 courses of IEV chemotherapy before ASCT, and all patients received a conditioning regimen of combined carmustine, etoposide, cytosine arabinoside, and melphalan. The prognostic impact of pretransplantation PET, sAA-IPI score, histology, and previous response to first-line chemotherapy was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS. Seventy-two of 75 patients underwent ASCT. In a univariate analysis for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), a significant association was observed with pretransplantation PET (PFS, P < .00001; OS, P < .01) and previous first-line response (PFS, P = .02; OS, P = .04). In the multivariate framework, pretransplantation PET was identified as the only independent prognostic factor (PFS, P < .001; OS, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS. The current data indicated that pretransplantation PET is the main prognostic predictor in patients with aggressive B-cell NHL who are scheduled for ASCT. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.

Background A prospective, single-arm, open-label, nonrandomized phase II combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) plus radioimmunotherapy trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety in untreated elderly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Patients and methods From February 2005 to April 2006, in our institute we treated 20 eligible elderly (age ≥60 years) patients with previously untreated DLBCL using a novel regimen consisting of six cycles of CHOP chemotherapy followed 6–10 weeks later by 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan. Results The overall response rate to the entire treatment regimen was 100%, including 95% complete remission (CR) and 5% partial remission. Four (80%) of the five patients who achieved less than a CR with CHOP improved their remission status after radioimmunotherapy. With a median follow-up of 15 months, the 2-year progression-free survival was estimated to be 75%, with a 2-year overall survival of 95%. The 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan toxicity included grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity in 12 of 20 patients; the most common grade ≥3 toxic effects were neutropenia (12 patients) and thrombocytopenia (7 patients). Transfusions of red blood cells and/or platelets were given to one patient. Conclusion This study has established the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of this regimen for elderly patients with DLBCL.

Extramedullary myeloid tumours (EMMTs) are haematological tumours of malignant myeloid cells arising in extramedullary sites. The occurrence of EMMT in patients without leukemia is rare and in the ...

Background and Objectives Follow-ups of patients with mediastinal lymphoma are not accurate if they rely on computed tomography (CT). Positron emission tomography (PET) has been suggested to be useful in several lymphoma settings, such as initial staging, evaluation of residual masses after therapy, and assessment of response early in the course of treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to verify the reliability of positive PET scans of the mediastinum in following up patients wirh mediastinal lymphoma, using histological findings as a comparison. Design and Methods From January 2002 to July 2005, 151 patients with mediastinal lymphoma (57 with Hodgkin’s disease [HD] and 94 with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [NHL]) were followed-up after the end of front-line treatment. Patients with a positive PET scan of the mediastinum underwent CT scanning and surgical biopsy. Results In 30 (21 HD and 9 NHL) out of 151 patients (20%) a suspicion of lymphoma relapse was raised based on positive mediastinal PET scanning. Histology confirmed this suspicion in 17 (10 HD and 7 NHL) out of 30 patients (57%), whereas either benign (9 fibrosis, 3 sarcoid-like granulomatosis) or unrelated neoplastic conditions (1 thymoma) were demonstrated in the remaining 13 patients (43%). SUVmax was significantly higher among patients who had signs of relapse (17 true positive cases) than among those who stayed in remission (13 false positive cases), the median values being 5.95 (range, 3.5–26.9) and 2.90 (range, 1.4–3.3), respectively ( p =0.01). Interpretation and Conclusions We suggest that a positive PET scan of the mediastinum of a patient being followed-up for a mediastinal lymphoma should not be considered sufficient for diagnostic purposes in view of its lack of discrimination. Histological confirmation can safely be carried out with various biopsy techniques, the choice of which should be made on the basis of the findings of the clinical and imaging studies of the individual case.

Background: The course of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) partly depends on the mutational status of the variable region of immunoglobulin heavy chain genes (IgV H ), which defines two subgroups of tumours: mutated and unmutated. The expression of zeta-associated protein 70 (ZAP70) is significantly associated with the more aggressive unmutated forms. Aims: To assess the feasibility of the ZAP70 immunohistochemical test on bone-marrow biopsy (BMB) specimens and to compare the results with those of western blotting (WB) and IgV H mutational status assessed on neoplastic cells from peripheral blood. Methods: 26 patients with CLL/SLL detected on BMB and with known IgV H mutational status were selected. ZAP70 was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) comparing three antibodies from different sources (Upstate, Cell Signaling, Santa Cruz, California, USA) and two different methods (APAAP and EnVision + ). In 23 cases, ZAP70 WB results were also available. Results: ZAP70 determination on BMB specimens turned out to be easily feasible with routine procedures with reagents from Upstate and Cell Signaling. The results were concordant with those obtained with WB and mutational status analysis in >80% of the cases with both reagents. Three of four discordant cases were mutated/ZAP70 positive, with two staining weakly for ZAP70 on both WB and IHC. Conclusions: The study confirms the role of ZAP70 as a possible surrogate of mutational status and emphasises its application in routine diagnostics; it discloses a small subset of discordant cases (mutated/ZAP70 weakly positive) that clinically cluster with the more favourable forms.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) after induction treatment. Patients and Methods: In all, 45 previously untreated patients with FL were studied with PET and computed tomography (CT) scans after chemotherapy induction treatment (fludarabine-containing regimens and CHOP [cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone] chemotherapy). Histopathologic analysis was performed when considered necessary. Results: After treatment, 4 of 5 patients (80%) who had CT-negative/PET-positive findings experienced relapse/progression, compared with only 1 of 22 patients (4.5%) in the CT-negative/PET-negative subset. Among the 18 patients with CT-positive findings, all 6 patients (100%) who had PET-positive findings experienced relapse or progression, compared with 1 of 12 patients (8.3%) who had PET-negative findings. The 2-year progression-free survival rates were 20% and 90% in the CT-negative/PET-positive and CT-positive/ PET-negative subsets, respectively ( P = 0.0031). During the follow-up, 2 patients, who presented a PET positivity with a negative CT scan, underwent a lymph node biopsy, which confirmed the presence of FL infiltration. Conclusion: In patients with FL, persisting PET positivity is predictive of early disease progression, because it is still highly likely that patients with PET-negative findings will ultimately progress, but this has not yet been manifested during the period of observation.

Risk stratification on the basis of Deauville score on PET-CT and the presence of Epstein-Barr virus DNA after completion of primary treatment for extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: a multicentre, retrospective analysis.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is typically characterized by repeated remissions and relapses, and many patients receive a number of therapeutic interventions during their disease course. Although treatment options are evolving rapidly, stem cell transplantation offers a potentially favorable impact on survival. In general, many patients with FL are not eligible for this approach by virtue of age and/or comorbid disease. Salvage chemotherapy consequently remains the mainstay of treatment, being individualized according to disease and patient characteristics, goals of therapy, and patient preference. Many of the cytotoxic agents used in relapsed FL are highly myelotoxic, leading to significant morbidity and mortality, including febrile neutropenia, hemorrhage, and impaired quality of life. Nausea and vomiting can also be problematic, particularly with regimens incorporating carmustine, cisplatin, and high-dose cyclophosphamide. Other acute toxicities include mucositis, alopecia, extravasation injuries, and neurotoxicity. Late toxicities can also occur, sometimes months or even years after the administration of antineoplastic agents. Acute myeloid leukemias, myelodysplastic syndromes, or solid tumors can occur after chemotherapy with alkylating agents. The cardiotoxic profile of anthracycline antibiotics is well recognized, and several agents, including carmustine and cyclophosphamide, can cause lung injury. Persistent neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and vascular toxicity have also been reported in association with chemotherapeutic agents used in patients with relapsed FL. Novel therapeutic strategies might allow patients to achieve longer remissions, potentially reducing lifetime exposure to repeated cycles of chemotherapy and their attendant toxicities. These could include the use of more efficient preparative and purging approaches in the transplantation setting or the administration of rituximab maintenance therapy after (immuno) chemotherapy induction or transplantation.

To evaluate the sensitivity of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. A total of 32 patients with a histological diagnosis of extra-nodal MALT lymphoma were referred to the PET Centers in the last 2 years (2003 - 2004) and scanned with 18F-FDG-PET following standard procedures. Overall, the results of 50 18F-FDG-PET scans performed in either active disease state or in complete remission were reviewed. Sites of primary disease included stomach, lung, parotid, skin, orbit, mandible, esophagus and uterus. This study retrospectively enrolled 26 patients with known active disease. 18F-FDG-PET was true positive (TP) in 21/26 patients and false negative (FN) in 5/26. Sensitivity of 18F FDG-PET for extra-nodal MALT was 81%. The data show that 18FDG-PET is a useful diagnostic tool in order to stage, restage or monitor disease in patients with extra-nodal MALT lymphoma.

In order to assess the efficacy and toxicity profile of oxaliplatin, a third generation platinum derivate active against several solid tumors, we carried out a study in a group of heavily pretreated patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Between August 2003 and May 2004, 19 pretreated patients were enrolled in a phase II trial and were treated with oxaliplatin. The drug was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day schedule, at a dose of 130 mg/m2 for a total of 6 cycles. One (5%) patient achieved complete remission (CR) and 5 patients (27%) had partial response (PR), thus giving an overall response rate of 32%. The patient in CR suffered from an aggressive B NHL. One of the 5 patients in PR had an aggressive B NHL, whereas the remaining 4 had an indolent B NHL. The treatment was well tolerated with minimal hematologic and extrahematologic toxicity. These data suggest and confirm the efficacy and low toxicity of oxaliplatin in the treatment of patients with heavily pretreated NHL. Further trials using oxaliplatin alone or in combination with other conventional drugs are needed.

Baseline anemia is a relevant prognostic factor in the overall population of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients, and studies focusing on elderly NHL are awaited. We conducted a pooled analysis of a cohort of comparable patients enrolled (1993 - 2001) in three multicenter clinical trials on use of a MACOP-B-like regimen (VNCOP-B) for front-line treatment of elderly aggressive NHL. Models of Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis of prognostic value of pre-/post-treatment hemoglobin values in terms of 5-year overall survival included age, sex, initial tumor staging and response to treatment. Of the 168 patients screened, 16 were excluded due to missing data or lack of 5-year follow-up. In addition to achievement of complete/partial remission (adjusted relative risk [RR], 0.215; p = 0.0001) and advanced stage (II-IV vs. I - II; adjusted RR, 1.55; p = 0.0023), post-treatment hemoglobin values were an independent predictor of survival (adjusted RR per 1-g/dL increment, 0.76; p = 0.0041). In the present analysis, pretreatment hemoglobin values were associated with only marginal risk reduction (adjusted RR per 1-g/dL increment, 0.985; p = 0.049). Post-treatment hemoglobin values appear to provide a strong independent predictor of 5-year survival in elderly aggressive NHL, supporting the potential role of anemia correction in this group of patients.

No abstract is available for this article.

Clinical Practice Points Relapsed and refractory T-cell lymphomas represent a great challenge for clinicians because of their scarce tendency to show a response to further conventional treatments: in particular, for systemic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) treatment outcomes remain unknown and their potential benefits are still difficult assess. The conventional therapy in relapsed/refractory ALCL is poorly defined and no standard of care exists in this setting. It is difficult to obtain complete remissions using single-agent therapy. The wide expression of the CD30 antigen in ALCL cells makes this molecule a suitable target for monoclonal antibodies. In a phase II trial, the anti-CD30 monoclonal immunoconjugated brentuximab vedotin has shown an impressive effect in patients with relapsed ALKnegative ALCL, with high overall and complete response rates. Brentuximab vedotin is now approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with relapsed ALCL, and now represents a valid treatment strategy for heavily pretreated patients.

Fludarabine, a purine nucleoside analog, is currently indicated for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and is also licensed for the management of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in countries such as Switzerland and Canada. Clinical evidence from studies in patients with NHL suggests that fludarabine monotherapy is at least as effective, if not better, than conventional therapies such as cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (CVP) for the first- and second-line treatment of NHL, achieving objective response rates of 31-84%. The combination of fludarabine with other chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide or mitoxantrone also provides the clinician with additional useful treatment options in this setting. Objective response rates of 70-100% have been reported with fludarabine-containing combination regimens, often exceeding those reported with CVP. Furthermore, beneficial effects on overall and progression-free survival have been reported with fludarabine or fludarabine-containing combination regimens in a number of studies, including a significant survival benefit with the combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone and rituximab. While adverse events such as granulocytopenia, neutropenia and anemia and, less frequently, infectious complications have been reported with fludarabine, its adverse event profile generally compares favorably with that of other available treatment options. Available clinical data therefore indicate that fludarabine has an important role to play in the treatment of patients with indolent NHL. Further, studies are warranted to identify the optimal fludarabine regimen for this patient group.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

A retrospective survey of patients with pathologically reviewed extragastric mucosa-associated lymphoma tissue (MALT) lymphomas from 20 institutions was performed. A total of 180 patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of extragastric MALT lymphomas were studied. Their median age was 59 years (range, 21-92 years). Ann Arbor stage I disease was present in 115 patients (64%) and stage II disease in 16 (9%). Most cases were in the low or low-intermediate risk groups according to the International Prognostic Index (IPI). Forty-one (23%) patients had involvement of more than one extranodal site at diagnosis and in 24 cases (13%) the lymphoma presented at multiple mucosal sites (9 of them with only mucosal involvement, without bone marrow or nodal disease). Lymph node involvement was present in 21%. Patients were treated with a variety of therapeutic strategies, including chemotherapy in 78 cases. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached; the 5-year OS rate was 90% (95% CI, 82%-94%), the 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS) was 94% (95% CI, 87%-97%), and the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 60% (95% CI, 50%-70%). Multivariate analysis showed that Ann Arbor stage was significantly associated with longer OS, nodal involvement with longer CSS, and favorable IPI score with better PFS. At a median follow-up of 3.4 years, 48 patients (27%; 95% CI, 20%-34%) had a relapse, 6 (3%; 95% CI, 1%-7%) showed histologic transformation, and 18 (10%; 95% CI, 6%-15%) experienced the development of a second tumor. Our data confirm the indolent nature of nongastric MALT lymphomas and the high rate of patients presenting with disseminated disease, which, when limited to mucosal sites, was not associated with a poorer outcome.

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) patients could have an excellent prognosis with adequate treatment. Treatments are not generally curative but are extremely effective in inducing long-lasting clinical remissions. An observational retrospective study was conducted on a single-center registry of 144 patients with a median follow-up of 11.5 years, focusing on long-lasting continuous first complete remissions (CR) wondering if patients can be cured only with front-line approach. CR for more than 5 years after first-line therapy were found in 22.2 \% cases. The median duration of response was 9.8 years, while for relapsed patients, the first response had a median duration of 2.4 years. Three different subsets of long-lasting first CR were identified: 15 patients are between 5 and 10 years with a median duration of CR of 6.5 years; 7 patients are between 10 and 15 years with a median duration of CR of 12.3 years; and 10 patients present a follow-up superior to 15 years with a median duration of CR of 20.0 years. There is a need for continuous study in this field to better define the optimal therapeutic regimen and, in particular, the biological issues since at least 20-25 \% of HCL patients can be cured with only one treatment.

Not available.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas not otherwise specified (PTCL/NOS) are very aggressive tumors characterized by consistent aberrant expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). In this study, we aimed to identify the determinants of PDGFRA activity in PTCL/NOS and to elucidate the biological consequences of its activation. We observed overexpression of the PDGFRA gene by gene expression profiling in most of the tested PTCLs and confirmed the expression of PDGFRA and phospho-PDGFRA using immunohistochemistry. The integrity of the PDFGRA locus was demonstrated using several different approaches, including massive parallel sequencing and Sanger sequencing. PDGF-AA was found to be expressed and secreted by PTCL/NOS cells and to be necessary and sufficient for PDGFRA phosphorylation ex vivo by sustaining an autocrine stimulation. We documented consistently high PDGF-A expression in primary biopsies and patients' plasma and tracked PDGFRA signaling in primary tumors, achieving evidence of its activation. Indeed, we found that STAT1 and STAT5 are implicated in PDGFRA signaling transduction. Finally, we demonstrated that PDGFRA activation supported tumor cell proliferation and provided the first evidence of the anti-lymphoma activity of PDGRA inhibition in a PTCL/NOS patient. Altogether, our data demonstrated that PDGFRA activity fosters PTCL/NOS proliferation via an autocrine loop. © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.

Clinical trial results indicate that lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug, is a promising treatment in relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). This retrospective multicenter study was conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL treated with lenalidomide monotherapy through a Named Patient Program in Italy. Principal endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), safety and overall survival (OS). The ORR in 64 evaluable patients was 42.2\% and was similar among patients receiving 10, 15 or 25 mg/day lenalidomide. Response rates in patients with mantle cell, diffuse large B-cell and follicular lymphoma were 45.5\%, 42.1\% and 20\%, respectively. Among patients who responded to most recent prior therapy, ORR was 50.0\% versus 36.8\% in patients with refractory NHL. Mean duration of response in patients receiving any lenalidomide dose was 10.5 months; 1-year progression-free survival and OS were 50.3\% and 82.6\%, respectively. These findings suggest that lenalidomide is effective and safe for heavily pretreated patients with NHL in the clinical setting.

Item does not contain fulltext Lumiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets CD23 on the surface of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) B-cells. Early phase clinical studies with lumiliximab alone and in combination with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) established its potential efficacy and tolerability. The 152CL201 trial [Lumiliximab with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) versus FCR alone in subjects with relapsed CLL; LUCID] was a phase 2/3, randomized (1:1), open-label, multicentre study of lumiliximab in combination with FCR versus FCR alone in patients with relapsed CLL. Six hundred and twenty-seven patients were randomized to either arm. Overall the combination of lumiliximab with FCR was not significantly better than FCR alone (overall response rate 71% vs. 72%, complete response rate 16% vs. 15%, median progression-free survival 24.6 vs. 23.9 months respectively, for FCR with and without lumiliximab). There was a slightly increased incidence of adverse events with lumiliximab but these increases did not appear to lead to differences in eventual outcomes. An interim analysis failed to show sufficient efficacy of the combination of lumiliximab with FCR. The study was therefore stopped early for lack of efficacy. Despite the eventual outcome, the LUCID trial is one of the largest studies that provides valuable insight into the efficacy and tolerability of FCR as a therapeutic option for patients with relapsed CLL.

The standards of care for firstand second-line therapy have been well established in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL).1 Initial therapy includes CHOP (cyclophosphamide/ doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) with or without rituximab, which may be followed by an autologous stem cell transplantation procedure in selected patients.2-4 Patients who experience relapse after an initial complete response (CR) or who have refractory disease receive high-dose chemotherapy with a non–crossresistant combination regimen in an attempt to achieve a second response. Active regimens include DHAP (dexamethasone/ cytarabine/cisplatin), ESHAP (methylprednisolone/etoposide/ cytarabine/cisplatin), and ICE (ifosfamide/carboplatin/ etoposide).5-7 Patients responding to second-line therapy might be eligible for consolidation therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation.8 The standard CHOP regimen cures 30%-40% of patients with advanced, aggressive NHL9; of the remaining patients, approximately half will respond to second-line treatment.8 However, no standard therapy has been established for patients experiencing relapse or with refractory disease after second-line treatment. Although initial therapy is intended to be curative, the treatment goal for patients in whom firstand second-line therapy is failing is palliative, and depending on performance status and prognosis, patients may receive single-agent or combination chemotherapy.10 A formal comparison of the clinical benefits of single-agent versus combination therapy in this setting is not available. However, several single agents are reportedly active in patients with second or greater relapse of aggressive NHL, including etoposide, vinorelbine, oxaliplatin, ifosfamide, mitoxantrone, gemcitabine, and rituximab.10-13 Pixantrone is an anthraquinone-based inhibitor of topoisomerase II. It is similar to the anthracycline doxorubicin and the anthracenedione mitoxantrone but lacks the 5,8-dihydroxy–substitution pattern of mitoxantrone that has been implicated in treatment-related cardiac toxicity.14 Preclinical studies showed that the activity of pixantrone against hematologic neoplasias in a mouse model is greater than that of doxorubicin or mitoxantrone.15 In a phase I study in patients with relapsed/refractory malignant lymphoma, pixantrone was well tolerated and showed encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients.16 The recommended dose from this study was 84 mg/m2 daily in an once weekly for 3 weeks treatment schedule (days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle). The activity of single-agent pixantrone was evaluated in a phase II study predominantly enrolling elderly patients with multiply relapsed, aggressive NHL.17 Thirty-three patients with a median age of 66 years were treated with pixantrone as a single agent at 85 mg/m2 daily on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Confirmed responses included 5 CRs and 4 partial remissions, with the median duration of response being > 11 months. The regimen was generally well tolerated, although the third dose in each cycle was frequently delayed or omitted because of myelosuppressive toxicity. The present study is designed to compare the efficacy of single-agent pixantrone to other singleagent treatment options in patients with aggressive NHL who have received 2 combination chemotherapy regimens. EXTEND PIX301: A Phase III Randomized Trial of Pixantrone Versus Other Chemotherapeutic Agents as Third-Line Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed, Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) represent the “ bad cousins ” of the non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) family. PTCLs are a heterogeneous group of malignancies derived from post-thymic T cells, representing approximately 11% of all cases of NHL included in the International Lymphoma Study Group [1]. Th e most commonly encountered subtypes are the so-called nodal PTCLs: PTCL not otherwise specifi ed (PTCL-NOS), systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL). With the exception of ALCL (particularly the subtype positive for anaplastic lymphoma kinase), they are mostly characterized by a dismal prognosis. Several clinical studies have reported a median survival of less than 2 years for patients with PTCLs and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of less than 30% [2,3]. In their article published in this issue of Leukemia and Lymphoma , Broussais-Guillaumot et al . [4] report the daily experience in the treatment and outcome of patients with PTCL in “ reality. ” Th eir data are the refl ection of the true situation we in fact have and witness in hematologic institutions around the world: 48% of patients achieved a complete response to the CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy induction regimen, with 5-year OS and event-free survival rates of 28% and 18%, respectively, for the entire population. Unfortunately, CHOP still remains the standard front-line chemotherapy regimen. Th e evolution of PTCL biology and therapy has lagged behind that of B-cell lymphomas, partly due to the fact that in the lymphoproliferative world, PTCLs have only relatively recently been identifi ed as distinct from their B-cell counterparts [5]. Th e explanation for the poor treatment outcome in patients with PTCLs in contrast to those with aggressive B-cell lymphomas remains uncertain. However, one possibility is that the rarity of these disorders has made them diffi cult to study, and the results for patients with PTCLs in studies relating to the therapy of aggressive NHL are “ lost, ” because these cases represent such a small proportion of all those being studied. Th e one thing that can be said with certainty is: what we currently consider optimal treatment for diff use large B-cell lymphoma is not equally effi cacious for PTCL. Durable remissions are uncommon with CHOP-based chemotherapy, particularly in those patients with high risk disease [6]; however, some patients respond to secondary treatment and are able to proceed to high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplant [7], which is considered the standard of care in this setting. Relapsed/refractory PTCL is a rare disease that follows a more aggressive clinical course than other lymphomas and is associated with the poorest prognosis of all histological subtypes of NHL. Patients who do not respond to front-line treatment or who relapse after a response to such treatment are in fact often either ineligible for transplant or relapse after transplant. Th e availability of agents with the potential to induce a response and prevent the disease from further progression is critical for the treatment and continued survival of these patients. Th e survival rates in PTCL fall even lower following relapse from second and further lines of treatment, as evidenced by the survival after failure. Recognizing the fact that relapsed/refractory PTCL represents an unmet medical need, in the last several years there have been a number of novel therapies tested specifi cally in relapsed/refractory PTCLs [8]. Further, data are emerging to suggest that PTCLs may be selectively sensitive to drugs that are not as active in aggressive B-cell lymphomas [8], providing a strong rationale to study these diseases separately. Th e history of PTCL is abundant, and signifi cant advances have been made over the past few years. From a therapeutic perspective, the new biopathologic and pharmarmacologic advances have led to a “ boost ” in the development of novel therapeutic approaches for PTCLs. Among these new agents, most recently, three agents have obtained Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for relapsed/refractory patients: pralatrexate, a folate antagonist; romidepsin, a histone deacetylase inhibitor; and brentuximab vedotin (only for patients with ALCL), an anti-CD30 antibody – drug conjugate [9 – 12]. On the basis of these interesting advances on pretreated patients with PTCL, the next probable step

We assessed the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) within the ML17638 phase 3 trial from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi, investigating the role of rituximab maintenance in elderly follicular lymphoma (FL) patients after a brief first-line chemoimmunotherapy. MRD for the bcl-2/IgH translocation was determined on bone marrow cells in a centralized laboratory belonging to the Euro-MRD consortium, using qualitative and quantitative polymerase chain reactions (PCRs). Of 234 enrolled patients, 227 (97%) were screened at diagnosis. A molecular marker (MM) was found in 51%. Patients with an MM were monitored at 8 subsequent times. Of the 675 expected follow-up samples, 83% were analyzed. Conversion to PCR negativity predicted better progression-free survival (PFS) at all post-treatment times (eg, end of therapy: 3-year PFS, 72% vs 39%; P < .007). MRD was predictive in both maintenance (83% vs 60%; P < .007) and observation (71% vs 50%; P < .001) groups. PCR positivity at the end of induction was an independent adverse predictor (hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-7.07). MRD is a powerful independent outcome predictor in FL patients who receive rituximab-intensive programs, suggesting a need to investigate its value for decision-making. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrial.gov as #NCT01144364.

There is no international consensus on front-line optimal chemotherapy regimen for advanced stage follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, or a clear definition of cure for this disease. Aim of this study was to test the degree of effectiveness and the safety of the regimen containing fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and rituximab in a subset of poor prognosis FL patients with particular focus on the long-term disease-free survival. A retrospective study was conducted on 142 intermediate/high-risk FL patients treated in first-line with fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and rituximab regimen. Responses, safety, and survival were evaluated. The prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) was also investigated in a 56-patients subset. Overall response rate was 95.5% including 88% of complete responses. With a median follow-up of 48 months, 18% of patients had disease relapse, yielding an estimated 12-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 72%. All cases showed the lymphoma recurrence within 40 months: after this timing the DFS curve presented a plateau. Overall survival was 73% at 12 years. Post-treatment PET positivity remains a highly significant predictor of disease progression. The observed high rate of complete responses following the use of fludarabine, mitoxantrone-based regimen in combination with rituximab seems to be the first step to improve DFS. Our study could be the starting point to consider DFS as a potential alternative endpoint of future clinical trials on FL patients. Am. J. Heamtol. 88:E273–E276, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background The role of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) in follicular lymphoma (FL) staging is not yet determined. Patients and methods The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of PET in the initial staging of FL patients enrolled in the FOLL05-phase-III trial that compared first-line regimens (R-CVP, R-CHOP and R-FM). Patients should have undergone conventional staging and have available PET baseline to be included. Results A total of 142 patients were analysed. PET identified a higher number of nodal areas in 32% (46 of 142) of patients and more extranodal (EN) sites than computed tomography (CT) scan. Also, the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score increased in 18% (26 of 142) and decreased in 6% (9 of 142) of patients. Overall, the impact of PET on modifying the stage was highest in patients with limited stage. Actually, 62% (15 of 24) of cases with limited disease were upstaged with PET. Conclusions The inclusion of PET among staging procedures makes the evaluation of patients with FL more accurate and has the potential to modify therapy decision and prognosis in a moderate proportion of patients. Further prospective clinical trials on FL should incorporate PET at different moments, and the therapeutic criteria to start therapy should be re-visited in the views of this new tool.

BACKGROUND: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with poor overall prognosis, requiring the development of new therapies. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent demonstrating antitumor and antiproliferative effects in MCL. We report results from a long-term subset analysis of 57 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL from the NHL-003 phase II multicenter study of single-agent lenalidomide in patients with aggressive lymphoma DESIGN: Lenalidomide was administered orally 25 mg daily on days 1-21 every 28 days until progressive disease (PD) or intolerability. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with relapsed/refractory, advanced-stage MCL had a median of three prior therapies. The ORR was 35% [complete response (CR)/CR unconfirmed (CRu) 12%], with a median duration of response (DOR) of 16.3 months (not yet reached in patients with CR/CRu) by blinded independent central review. The median time to first response was 1.9 months. Median progression-free survival was 8.8 months, and overall survival had not yet been reached. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (46%), thrombocytopenia (30%), and anemia (13%). CONCLUSIONS: These results show the activity of lenalidomide in heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory MCL. Responders had a durable response with manageable side-effects. Clinical trial number posted on www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00413036.