1. A trinity technique for prevention of low rectal anastomotic leakage in the robotic era
- Author
-
Meiling Ji, Mi Jian, Fei Liang, Li Ren, Jianmin Xu, Tianyu Liu, Wenju Chang, Guodong He, Ye Wei, and Yijiao Chen
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Reoperation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Colon ,Colorectal cancer ,Anastomotic Leak ,030230 surgery ,Anastomosis ,Patient Readmission ,03 medical and health sciences ,Postoperative Complications ,0302 clinical medicine ,Robotic Surgical Procedures ,Blood loss ,Surgical Stapling ,medicine ,Humans ,Severe complication ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Proctectomy ,Low Anterior Resection ,Rectal Neoplasms ,business.industry ,Anastomosis, Surgical ,Rectal Anastomotic Leakage ,Mesenteric Artery, Inferior ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Control subjects ,Surgery ,Logistic Models ,Oncology ,Anastomotic leakage ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Multivariate Analysis ,Drainage ,Lymph Node Excision ,Female ,business - Abstract
Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication of low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer, and effective prevention is urgently needed. In the robotic era, this study aimed to explore the role of innovative techniques in preventing AL in rectal cancer patients undergoing robotic LAR. Methods From May 2012 to May 2017, a total of 601 patients underwent robotic LAR, with 191 patients participated as control subjects (non-PST group) and 410 patients are subjected to a trinity technique (PST group). The AL rate, short-term and long-term outcomes are analyzed and compared. Results The overall rate of AL was 6.8% out of 601 patients, with Grade B at 5.7% and Grade C at 1.1%, using the ISREC grading system. The PST group presented lower incidence of both overall AL (5.1% vs 10.5%, P = 0.015) and major AL (0.2% vs 3.2%, P = 0.005), when compared with the non-PST group, respectively. Furthermore, the PST group had similar surgical complications (17.3% vs 20.9%, P = 0.286), while with lower re-hospitalization rate (2.7% vs 6.3%, P = 0.038) and reoperation rate (0.2% vs 4.2%, P = 0.001), compared with the non-PST group, respectively. Short-term recovery and long-term oncological outcomes were not significant in the two groups. By multivariate logistic regression models, the risk factors of AL of robotic LAR are confirmed as non-PST technique, estimated blood loss ≥100 mL, anastomosis from anal verge Conclusions The innovative PST technique may shed light on an effective method for preventing occurrence of AL in robotic LAR.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF