1. Clinical performance of lung ultrasound in predicting ARDS morphology
- Author
-
Alberto Goffi, V. Marco Ranieri, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Anna Teresa Mazzeo, Simona Veglia, Ottavio Davini, Emanuele Pivetta, Irene Steinberg, Pietro Arina, Andrea Costamagna, Vito Fanelli, and Luca Brazzi
- Subjects
ARDS ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Medicine ,ARDS morphology ,Bedside tests ,Lung ultrasound ,Point of care diagnostic tests ,Respiratory monitoring ,Lung ,Training set ,business.industry ,Research ,Ultrasound ,Clinical performance ,lcsh:Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Gold standard (test) ,lcsh:RC86-88.9 ,medicine.disease ,Predictive value ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,030228 respiratory system ,Nuclear medicine ,business - Abstract
Background To assess diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound (LUS) in identifying ARDS morphology (focal vs non-focal), compared with the gold standard computed tomography. Methods Mechanically ventilated ARDS patients undergoing lung computed tomography and ultrasound were enrolled. Twelve fields, were evaluated. LUS score was graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (consolidation) according to B-lines extent. Total and regional LUS score as the sum of the four ventral (LUSV), intermediate (LUSI) or dorsal (LUSD) fields, were calculated. Based on lung CT, ARDS morphology was defined as (1) focal (loss of aeration with lobar distribution); (2) non-focal (widespread loss of aeration or segmental loss of aeration distribution associated with uneven lung attenuation areas), and diagnostic accuracy of LUS in discriminating ARDS morphology was determined by AU-ROC in training and validation set of patients. Results Forty-seven patients with ARDS (25 training set and 22 validation set) were enrolled. LUSTOT, LUSV and LUSI but not LUSD score were significantly lower in focal than in non-focal ARDS morphologies (p TOT, LUSV, LUSI and LUSD for identification of non-focal ARDS morphology were 0.890, 0.958, 0.884 and 0.421, respectively. LUSV value ≥ 3 had the best predictive value (sensitivity = 0.95, specificity = 1.00) in identifying non-focal ARDS morphology. In the validation set, an LUSV score ≥ 3 confirmed to be highly predictive of non-focal ARDS morphology, with a sensitivity and a specificity of 94% and 100%. Conclusions LUS had a valuable performance in distinguishing ARDS morphology.
- Published
- 2021