1. Comparative Effects of Etelcalcetide and Maxacalcitol on Serum Calcification Propensity in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
- Author
-
Tatsuya Nakatani, Yasuro Kumeda, Shozo Yodoi, Harumi Nagayama, Kiyoshi Maekawa, Takayoshi Hamada, Shinya Nakatani, Hisako Fujii, Sosuke Kagitani, Minoru Yoshiyama, Yoshinori Sai, Ayumi Shintani, Yoshikazu Kato, Yoshihiro Tsujimoto, Tetsuo Shoji, Daijiro Kabata, Hisako Yoshida, Kenjiro Yamakawa, Mayumi Sakurai, Yoshiteru Ohno, Yasue Obi, Takayasu Matsumura, Kiyoshi Goto, Keiko Ota, Satoshi Sasaki, Masahito Imanishi, Shinichi Nishi, Shinichiro Ueda, Eiji Ishimura, Katsuhito Mori, Shigeichi Shoji, Masaaki Inaba, Kaori Shidara, Hideaki Yasuda, Masanori Emoto, and K. Takahashi
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Epidemiology ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,law.invention ,Young Adult ,Cognition ,Calcitriol ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Interquartile range ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,Renal Insufficiency, Chronic ,Vascular Calcification ,Dialysis ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Etelcalcetide ,Transplantation ,Hyperparathyroidism ,Hand Strength ,business.industry ,Surrogate endpoint ,Original Articles ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Nephrology ,Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary ,Secondary hyperparathyroidism ,Hemodialysis ,Peptides ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vitamin D receptor activators and calcimimetics (calcium-sensing receptor agonists) are two major options for medical treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. A higher serum calcification propensity (a shorter T(50) value) is a novel surrogate marker of calcification stress and mortality in patients with CKD. We tested a hypothesis that a calcimimetic agent etelcalcetide is more effective in increasing T(50) value than a vitamin D receptor activator maxacalcitol. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded end point trial with active control was conducted in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing hemodialysis in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous etelcalcetide 5 mg thrice weekly (etelcalcetide group) or intravenous maxacalcitol 5 or 10 µg thrice weekly (maxacalcitol group). The primary, secondary, and tertiary outcomes were changes in T(50) value, handgrip strength, and score of the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System from baseline to 12 months, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 425 patients from 23 dialysis centers were screened for eligibility, 326 patients were randomized (etelcalcetide, n=167; control, n=159), and 321 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (median age, 66 years; 113 women [35%]). The median (interquartile range) of T(50) value was changed from 116 minutes (interquartile range, 90–151) to 131 minutes (interquartile range, 102–176) in the maxacalcitol group, whereas it was changed from 123 minutes (interquartile range, 98–174) to 166 minutes (interquartile range, 127–218) in the etelcalcetide group. The increase in T(50) value was significantly greater in the etelcalcetide group (difference in change, 20 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 7 to 34 minutes; P=0.004). No significant between-group difference was found in the change in handgrip strength or in the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System score. CONCLUSIONS: Etelcalcetide was more effective in increasing T(50) value than maxacalcitol among patients on hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism. There was no difference in handgrip strength or cognition between the two drugs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: VICTORY; UMIN000030636 and jRCTs051180156
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF