Search

Purpose To compare effectiveness of different treatments for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who were scheduled for cardioversion (CV) or ablation (CA) presenting with left atrium appendage (LAA) thrombus despite chronic oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). Methods This was a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed 2014–2019 medical records of patients scheduled for CV or CA of AF who were diagnosed with LAA thrombus despite optimal OAC and had a follow-up transesophageal echocardiogram (TOE). Changes in treatment were divided into the following groups: switch to a drug with different mechanism of action, switch to a drug with similar mechanism of action, initiation of combination therapy, or deliberate no change in treatment. Patients with contraindications to non-vitamin K antagonists were excluded from the analysis. Results We analyzed data of 129 patients comprising 181 cycles of treatment. The overall effectiveness of LAA thrombus dissolution was 51.9% regardless of the number of cycles and 42.6% for the first cycle of treatment. Any change of treatment was more effective than deliberate no change—OR 2.97 [95% CI: 1.07–8.25], P = 0.031, but no particular strategy seemed to be more effective than the other. Left atrium area (OR 0.908 [95% CI: 0.842–0.979]) and number of treatment cycles (OR 0.457 [95% CI: 0.239–0.872]) were both adversely related to thrombus resolution. There was one ischemic and three bleeding adverse events during the treatment. Conclusion LAA thrombus resolution in patients already on OAC may require a change of previous OAC treatment but the overall effectiveness of dissolution seems to be about 50%.

Objective Impaired cardiac adrenergic activity has been demonstrated in heart failure (HF) and in diabetes mellitus (DM). [123I]I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) enables assessment of the cardiac adrenergic nervous system. Tomographic imaging of the heart is expected to be superior to planar imaging. This study aimed to determine the quality and utility of MIBG SPECT in the assessment of cardiac innervation in postinfarction HF patients without DM, qualified for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Methods Consecutive patients receiving an ICD on the basis of contemporary guidelines were prospectively included. Planar MIBG studies were followed by SPECT. The essential analysis was based on visual assessment of the quality of SPECT images (“high”, “low” or “unacceptable”). The variables used in the further analysis were late summed defect score for SPECT images and heart-to-mediastinum rate for planar images. MIBG images were assessed independently by two experienced readers. Results Fifty postinfarction nondiabetic HF subjects were enrolled. In 13 patients (26%), the assessment of SPECT studies was impossible. In addition, in 13 of 37 patients who underwent semiquantitative SPECT evaluation, the assessment was equivocal. Altogether, in 26/50 patients (52%, 95% confidence interval 38–65%), the quality of SPECT images was unacceptable or low and was limited by low MIBG cardiac uptake and by comparatively high, interfering MIBG uptake in the neighboring structures (primarily, in the lungs). Conclusions The utility of MIBG SPECT imaging, at least with conventional imaging protocols, in the qualification of postinfarction HF patients for ICD, is limited. In approximately half of the postinfarction HF patients, SPECT assessment of cardiac innervation can be impossible or equivocal, even without additional damage from diabetic cardiac neuropathy. The criteria predisposing the patient to good-quality MIBG SPECT are: high values of LVEF from the range characterizing the patients qualified to ICD (i.e., close to 35%) and left lung uptake intensity in planar images comparable to or lower than heart uptake.

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess exercise capacity and echocardiographic parameters in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in NYHA III functional class, after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation followed by 6 months of supervised rehabilitation in ICD patients. Materials and methods The study included patients with HFrEF and impaired left ventricle systolic function (LVEF ≤ 35%), divided into two groups: CRT group - patients after CRT-D implantation > six weeks, and ICD-rehab group - patients after ICD implantation > six weeks, followed by 6 months of supervised aerobic interval training and the conditioning exercises. At baseline and after 6 months in all the patients cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPX) and standard echocardiographic examinations were performed. Results The study included 61 patients (49–77 years) with HFrEF. At baseline, the values of CPX parameters were similar in both groups. After completing training almost all CPX parameters in the ICD-rehab group significantly improved, except for anaerobic threshold (AT). In the CRT group significant improvements were found in 2 parameters: peak oxygen uptake (VO2) and exercise tolerance (metabolic equivalents, METs). Significant reductions in left and right ventricle diameters and an increase in LVEF were observed in both groups after 6 months. Conclusions Significant improvement in exercise tolerance capacity and increase of LVEF were observed in similar extent both in heart failure patients with CRT and with ICD undergoing the rehabilitation program. Regular, controlled exercise trainings provided additional, safe and easy to conduct therapeutic option for heart failure patients with no indications for CRT.

Background: Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices allows the assessment of system effectiveness, arrhythmia occurrence, and indirectly, clinical changes. Medical interventions can be performed earlier because of a faster transfer of information to the monitoring site, even in the case of asymptomatic arrhythmias or abnormalities in the operation of the system. Aims: The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and evaluation in an outpatient setting during 12-month follow-up. Methods: We analyzed 176 patients at 10 sites (men, 84.1%). The mean (SD) age of the patients was 60.7 (12.5) years (range, 20–86 years), and mean (SD) follow-up period was 405 (70) days (range, 131–723 days). Results: A total of 354 outpatient and 514 remote follow-up visits were conducted. Episodes of arrhythmias and device malfunctions were detected with similar frequency in outpatient visits and in remote visits. During the study period, patient sense of safety increased. More patients preferred joined remote and outpatient visits as the optimal healthcare model. As the patient survey showed, the greatest benefit of the CareLink network was fast intervention and an increased sense of safety. Conclusions: The strategy of remote monitoring appeared to be feasible, safe, and patient friendly, demonstrating that the majority of patients do not require an additional in -person visit within 1 year from the device implantation just to confirm the proper functioning of the implantable cardioverter--defibrillators.

Leadless cardiac pacing is the therapeutic option, which may be the only, not just most optimal treatment method in some clinical conditions. The authors present the case report of permanent transvenous cardiac pacing lasting for more than 25 years, with numerous complications and evolving electrocardiotherapy intervention strategies.

INTRODUCTION Numerous studies described the effectiveness and safety of antazoline in pharmacological cardioversion of short‑duration atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are no data on the comparison of antazoline and antiarrhythmic drugs listed in clinical guidelines. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of antazoline‑based and propafenone‑based strategies in pharmacological cardioversion of short‑duration AF performed in our emergency department. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective case‑control study based on the analysis of medical records of patients undergoing pharmacological cardioversion of short‑duration AF with intravenous antazoline or propafenone at our department in the years 2008-2012. The primary endpoint was the successful cardioversion of AF. The primary safety endpoint was hospitalization due to the adverse effects of the treatment. RESULTS We analyzed 432 cases of cardioversion. The mean age of patients was 68.9 ±9.8 years; 65% of the patients were male; 90% of the patients had a history of AF. Antazoline was administered 334 times and propafenone-98 times. The mean dose of antazoline was 172 ±65 mg, while all patients in the propafenone group received the drug at a fixed dose of 70 mg (1 vial). Cardioversion with antazoline was successful in 239 cases (71.6%) and with propafenone-in 54 patients (55.1%) (relative risk [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.57). The rate of hospitalization due to the adverse effects of the treatment were low and similar between the study groups: 10 (3.0%) for antazoline and 4 (4.1%) for propafenone (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.23-2.27). CONCLUSIONS The antazoline‑based strategy was more effective and safer in comparison with propafenone‑based strategy in the pharmacological cardioversion of short‑duration AF in our emergency department.

Background: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is a complication of increasing incidence. We present a protocol of an observational case control clinical trial “Positron Emission Tomography Combined With Computed Tomography (PET CT) in Suspected Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection, a Pilot Study — PET Guidance I” (NCT02196753). Aim: The aim of this observational clinical trial is to assess and standardise diagnostic algorithms for CIED infections (lead-dependent infective endocarditis, generator pocket infection, fever of unknown origin) with PET CT in Poland. Methods and results: Study group will consist of 20 patients with initial diagnosis of CIED-related infection paired with a control group of 20 patients with implanted CIEDs, who underwent PET CT due to other non-infectious indications and have no data for infectious process in follow-up. All patients included in the study will undergo standard diagnostic pro­cess. Conventional/standard diagnostic and therapeutic process will consist of: medical interview, physical examination, laboratory tests, blood cultures; imaging studies: echocardiography: transthoracic (TTE), and, if there are no contraindications transoesophageal, computed tomography scan for pulmonary embolism if indicated; if there are abnormalities in other systems, decisions concerning further diagnostics will be made at the physician’s discretion. As well as standard diagnostic procedures, patients will undergo whole body PET CT scan to localise infection or inflammation. Diagnosis and therapeutic decision will be obtained from the Study Committee. Follow-up will be held within six months with control visits at three and six months. During each follow-up visit, all patients will undergo laboratory tests, two blood cultures collected 1 h apart, and TTE. In case of actual clinical suspicion of infective endocarditis or local generator pocket infection, patients will be referred for further diagnostics. Endpoints for the results assessment — primary endpoints are to standardise PET CT in the diagnostic process: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the diagnosis made by PET CT; secondary endpoints are: assessment of usefulness of PET CT for detection of remote infective complications (metastatic abscesses, infected pulmonary emboli), incidence of particular localisations of infection, influence of PET CT on therapeutic decision: confirmation or change of decision based on PET CT, safety and complications of diagnostic process of CIED-related infections with PET CT. Conclusions: Evaluation of PET CT use for device-related infections in a case control study may be conclusive and improve diagnostic pathway.

The author describes the case of the superior vena cava occlusion detected during the new implantation of the pacemaker after lead extraction due to pocket infection. New electrode was implanted via the right subclavian vein. The occlusion in the superior vena cava was overcome with a guidewire (0.32 F) and a diagnostic catheter (JR2).

Background Young implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients have a high rate of complications, some of which seem to be underestimated. We report our clinical experience with ICD therapy in children and young adults during a 15 year follow up. Methods We reviewed the database of ICD recipients at the present institution and chose 73 consecutive patients who underwent implantation at age 6-21 years. We analyzed intervention rate, mortality, rate and characteristics of complications and treatment options. Results A total of 20/73 patients (27.4%) received ≥1 episode of appropriate therapy (AT) for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (anti-tachycardia pacing or shock) and 24/73 patients (32.8%) had one or multiple episodes of inappropriate therapy (IT). Eight patients (11%) had both interventions: AT + IT. A total of 15/73 patients (20.5%) had ventricular lead dysfunction, with 13 re-implantations (17.8%) of a new system. Four of 73 patients (5.5%) had infection: endocarditis or device pocket infection. A total of 2/73 patients (2.7%) died due to ventricular lead dysfunction, while 22/73 patients (30.1%) needed elective device replacement, five of them twice (6.8%). Conclusion Endocardial ICD implantation in children and young adults is a feasible and life-saving procedure, according to the present 15 year follow up. The rate of complications including IT was high: 72.8% in the young ICD recipients. Re-implantation of a new system was often required due to ventricular lead dysfunction or infection in 25% of the patients.

Background: Antiarrhythmic treatment of patients with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmia, in whom catheter ablation and amiodarone treatment were ineffective or contraindicated, is an unsolved clinical problem. Aim: The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of mexiletine in patients with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and/or electrical storm events, in whom standard treatment strategies failed to prevent ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients treated with mexiletine for recurrent ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation in our institution between January 2011 and September 2015. The primary endpoints were total number of electrical storm events and ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) episodes after the beginning of mexiletine therapy. Secondary endpoints were total number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies and discontinuation of the therapy. Events were compared with a matched duration period before initiating mexiletine. Patients served as self-controls. Results: Seventeen patients were included in the study; 11 patients were males. Mean age was 64.2 ± 15.4 years. The median time of mexiletine treatment was eight months (interquartile range [IR]: 1–22 months). The mexiletine dose was 600 mg/day in 13 patients and 400 mg/day in four patients. In four patients the dose was modified during treatment in a range from 400 to 600 mg/day depending on clinical decision. Treatment with mexiletine significantly reduced the number of electrical storm events (14 episodes vs. two episodes; median and IR for 17 patients: 1 [0–1] vs. 0 [0–0], p = 0.0010), VT/VF episodes (285 vs. 74 episodes; median and IR for 17 patients: 7 [5–27] vs. 0 [0–5], p = 0.0115), and ICD interventions (317 interven­tions vs. nine interventions; median and IR for 17 patients: 10 [5–25] vs. 0 [0–2], p = 0.0006), in comparison with a matched period before initiation of treatment. In 14 out of 17 patients (82%) sufficient tolerability of mexiletine was observed. Only in three (18%) patients severe side effects of mexiletine treatment occurred requiring discontinuation of therapy. Conclusions: Mexiletine was a sufficiently tolerated antiarrhythmic drug in short-term treatment of ventricular tachyarrhyth­mias in the studied population. Mexiletine may be effective in the treatment of recurring ventricular tachyarrhythmias or electrical storm events.

Streszczenie Wstęp: Celem pracy była ocena poziomu aktywności fizycznej, jakości życia oraz lęku, stresu i depresji u pacjentów po wszczepieniu kardiowertera-defibrylatora (ICD), u których wystąpił bądź nie incydent burzy elektrycznej związany z wielokrotnymi interwencjami ICD. Materiał i metody: Przebadano 36 pacjentów z ICD w wieku od 39 do 83 lat. Pacjentów podzielono na dwie grupy: osoby u których wystąpił (Burza +) lub nie (Burza -) incydent burzy elektrycznej. Badano: poziom aktywności fizycznej, jakości życia oraz depresji, stresu i lęku. Wyniki: W grupie Burza (+) znamiennie częściej występowały utraty przytomności przed wszczepieniem ICD i wyładowania po implantacji, niż w grupie Burza (-). Stwierdzono, iż w grupie Burza (+) u znamiennie większej ilości osob występowała obawa przed wyładowaniami, w porównaniu z grupą Burza (-). Istotnie większy był też u niej poziom lęku. W grupie Burza (+) występowały łagodne objawy depresyjne, poziom stresu był natomiast zbliżony w obu grupach. Badani nie różnili się pomiędzy sobą w większości parametrów jakości życia oraz całotygodniowej aktywności fizycznej. Wnioski: 1.Występowanie incydentów burzy elektrycznej u pacjentów z ICD istotnie zwiększa poziomu lęku przed detekcją urządzenia, wpływa na występowanie łagodnych objawów depresyjnych. 2.Burza elektryczna nie rzutuje na wzrost poziomu odczuwanego stresu, ani też na całotygodniową aktywność fizyczną. 3. Burze elektryczne ograniczają wykonywanie pracy zawodowej i prac domowych.4.Częstsze utraty przytomności u pacjentów przed wszczepieniem ICD mogą wskazywać na zwiększenie częstotliwości burz elektrycznych pojawiających się po implantacji urządzenia.

Background: The increasing number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) causes a rise in the absolute percentage of individuals qualifying for a transvenous lead extraction (TLE) due to infectious, vascular or lead failure related indications. As the survival time prolongs, TLE procedures more and more often concern the electrodes of long- -term functioning. Authors provide a retrospective analysis of the effectiveness and safety of TLE performed on leads implanted at least 10 years before the extraction. Methods: Between 2008 and 2012 we performed TLE of 364 electrodes in 217 patients. Out of these, 66 (18.1%) leads in 43 (19.8%) patients had been implanted for at least 10 years. The mean dwelling time for electrodes was 161 months (120 to 330). In 62% of cases CIED-related infection was an indication for TLE. The following extracting techniques were used: manual direct traction, device traction, mechanical telescopic sheaths, autorotational cutting sheaths and femoral approach. Results: Fifty-eight pacemakers and 8 defibrillating leads were extracted. Sixty-three (95%) completely, in the remaining 3 cases the clinical success was achieved with the small portion of the lead left into the vascular space. No major procedure complications were observed; minor complications were found in 3 (6%) patients. Conclusions: TLE with the use of various endovascular techniques is an effective and safe method for treating infectious, vascular and mechanical complications of long-lasting CIEDs therapy.

Background: Previously presented new electrocardiography (ECG) algorithm for localization of arrhythmogenic focus (AFo) in right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) was based on spontaneous arrhythmia QRS morphology analysis. The aim of this study was to estimate the clinical value of our RVOT algorithm in a prospective study. Methods and results: Algorithm validation was made on 62 patients with RVOT arrhythmias (45 women), mean age 41.6 ± 14.3 years, scheduled for transcatheter ablation. Results of preablation ECG analysis with RVOT algorithm were matched with successful ablation sites and statistical indices: sensitivity (sens), specificity (spec), and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated for algorithm and for each of 9 RVOT zones (septal and free wall). An algorithm precisely localized AFo in 57 out of 62 patients (sens 91.3%, spec 99%, PPV 91%, NPV 98.8%). Sensitivity values for superior RVOT aspect (71% patients) varied from 88% to 100%, specificity from 95.9% to 100%; PPV values from 85.7% to 100%, NPV from 92.5% to 100%. Although the total number of patients was relatively small in the 2 remaining RVOT aspects (29% patients) high values (sens, spec, PPV, NPV) were gained for intermediate and inferior zones. Conclusions: On the basis of spontaneous arrhythmia QRS analysis, a novel algorithm was built for preablation localization of RVOT arrhythmia in 1 of the 9 RVOT zones. Prospective analysis of our ECG algorithm confirmed that it is a valuable tool to predict the site of successful ablation in patients with RVOT arrhythmias.

Introduction Right ventricular pacing (RVP) causes ventricular desynchronization and may lead to the development of heart failure (HF). Prolongation of atrioventricular delay (AVD) in DDDR pacemakers reduces unnecessary RV stimulation. The aim of the study was to verify the influence of RVP reduction on HF symptoms. Methods The study comprised 31 patients (17 men, mean age: 71.6 ± 8 yrs) with DDDR pacemaker implanted due to sinus node dysfunction (SND). At baseline, 28 patients did not present any symptoms of HF. Three patients were in NYHA class II. Patients were randomized either to 150 ms AVD or to minimizing right ventricular pacing (MRVP). Crossing over to the alternate mode took place after 4 months. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX), echocardiography (ECHO) and BNP measurements were done before pacemaker implantation, after 4 and 8 months. Results The percentage of RVP was significantly higher in 150 ms AVD than in MRVP: 81.7 ± 22.6 versus 14.2±20.5%, P < 0.0001. Patients with 150 ms mode had worse CPX parameters than those with MRVP mode: peak oxygen uptake was 14.2±4.3 versus 19.9±6.3 ml/kg per min, P = 0.0001, higher BNP concentrations: 72.3±48.3 versus 49.4±43.9 pg/ml, P = 0.001 and worse left ventricle [LV] function: ejection fraction: 53.2±6.7 versus 57.3±5.5%, P < 0.0001; LV diastolic diameter: 4.86±0.52 versus 4.66±0.5 cm, P < 0.01. Conclusion Predominant RVP in patients without symptoms of HF at baseline may be responsible for worse performance in cardiopulmonary exercise test, higher BNP concentrations and impairment of LV function. Specific DDDR pacemaker programming promotes intrinsic AV conduction and may prevent the development of pacing-induced HF.

Venous occlusion is a relatively common complication of endocardial lead implantation. It may cause a critical problem when implantation of a new lead is needed. Traditional methods result in leaving abandoned leads. The optimal approach seems to be the extraction of the damaged or abandoned lead, regaining venous access and implantation of a new lead.To assess the efficacy and safety of new lead implantation by the method of lead extraction.All transvenous lead extraction procedures (203 patients) between 1 August 2008 and 15 October 2012 were assessed. The analysis included cases with leads implanted for at least 6 months prior to extraction.Regaining venous access was the main indication for lead extraction in 5 patients (4.9%). The reason for new lead implantation was lead damage (n = 7) and system up-grade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (n = 3). In total, 23 leads were extracted (9 defibrillation leads, 12 pacing leads and 2 left ventricular leads). The mean time from the implantation was 92.2 ±43.2 (48-152) months. In all cases Cook mechanical sheaths were applied. The use of the Evolution system was necessary to extract 3 leads. In all cases the new leads were successfully implanted as planned. No serious complications occurred.Diagnosis of venous occlusion should not be a contraindication for ipsilateral implantation of the new lead, because the techniques of transvenous lead extraction enable successful regaining of venous access.Niedrożność żylna jest stosunkowo częstym powikłaniem implantacji elektrod endokawitarnych. Zazwyczaj przebiega ona bezobjawowo, lecz jest istotnym problem w sytuacjach, gdy zachodzi konieczność wszczepienia nowej elektrody. Tradycyjnie stosowane metody postępowania (wszczepienie nowego układu lub nowej elektrody po przeciwnej stronie i jej tunelizacja do loży urządzenia) wiążą się z pozostawieniem nieczynnych elektrod. Wydaje się, że optymalnym sposobem postępowania jest usunięcie uszkodzonej lub zbędnej elektrody, odzyskanie dostępu do układu żylnego i wszczepienie nowej elektrody.Ocena skuteczności i bezpieczeństwa implantacji nowej elektrody za pomocą techniki polegającej na usunięciu elektrody i odzyskiwaniu dostępu żylnego.Analizie poddano wszystkie zabiegi usunięcia elektrod przezżylnych techniką przezżylną od 1 sierpnia 2008 do 15 października 2012 roku. Zabiegi wykonano u 203 chorych. Uwzględniono jedynie zabiegi usunięcia elektrod implantowanych ≥ 6 miesięcy wcześniej.W badanej grupie odzyskanie dostępu żylnego było głównym wskazaniem do ekstrakcji elektrody u 10 pacjentów (4,9%). Konieczność wszczepienia nowej elektrody wynikała z uszkodzenia poprzedniej (Stwierdzenie niedrożności żylnej nie powinno być przeciwwskazaniem do implantacji nowych elektrod po stronie poprzednio wszczepionego urządzenia, ponieważ techniki przezżylnego usunięcia elektrod umożliwiają odzyskanie dostępu do układu żylnego.

The authors present the case of a 62-year-old male patient with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and end-stage heart failure supported with an intra-aortic balloon pump. Implantation of a triple-site cardiac resynchronization system and complex heart failure treatment brought a significant improvement, return to home activity and 17-month survival. The patient died due to heart failure aggravation. Within this time he was rehospitalized and successfully treated twice for an electrical storm.

Aims Having several recently published reports on increased rate of cardiac perforation with some lead models as background, we assess the relation between cardiac perforations and models of leads used. Methods and results All pacing and defibrillation leads implantations between 1 January 2007 and 31 March 2008 were analysed retrospectively. There were 2247 leads implanted in 1419 patients aged 67.6 ± 14.1, 1200 (53%) active and 1047 (47%) passive fixation leads. Cardiac perforation occurred in eight patients (0.5%). The number of perforations does not differ significantly between the pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantations (five and three cases, respectively, P = 0.13). All perforations were associated with the active fixation leads implantation (8 vs. 0, P < 0.01). Only four models of leads were associated with perforations, but the risk of their use was not statistically significantly increased, when compared with other active fixation leads placed in the adequate position. Conclusions The incidence of cardiac perforation related to pacing and defibrillation leads is low. The use of active fixation leads is associated with an increased risk of cardiac perforation. We did not find any correlation between the perforation rate and any particular model of the implanted lead.

Background: Ensuring a haemodynamically effective cardiac rhythm is a challenge in patients waiting for pacemaker reimplantation after transcutaneous lead extraction due to an infection of the implanted system. Aim: The authors report a retrospective analysis of temporary pacing with an active fixation lead (AFTP) connected to an externalised pacemaker in patients after transvenous lead extraction (TLE) due to an infection. Methods: AFTP was used in 34 patients (12 women) aged from 38 to 88 years (mean 67.5 years). This represented 24.5% of the population of patients undergoing TLE due to infective indications. In 32 cases, the indication for temporary pacing was atrioventricular block, and in 2 patients sick sinus syndrome. The lead was implanted via the internal jugular vein puncture into the right ventricle in 33 cases and into the right atrium in 1 case. Leads were secured to the skin and attached to externalized pacemakers. Results: AFTP was used for 4 to 26 days (average 14.5 days). Re-implantation was performed in 29 patients (85.3% of the study group). There was no early infection recurrence. Three patients died during AFTP (8.8% of the study group), including two due to septic shock, and a cardiac arrest due to pulseless electrical activity in another patient. Conclusions: Temporary pacing with an active fixation lead is an effective and safe method to ensure a hemodynamically stable heart rhythm for a period ranging from a few to several days after the surgery in patients after transcutaneous lead extraction due to infective indications.

Transvenous lead extraction can be a method to regain venous access. We present the case of a man, aged 67, with indications to upgrade an ICD to a resynchronization therapy device. Since innominate vein occlusion was diagnosed and extraction of an abandoned ventricular pacing lead did not provide lumen regain, a functional atrial lead was extracted with the femoral approach to stabilization and venous access was regained. Asymptomatic vein wall damage but no other complications were recorded. The simultaneous application of different techniques to regain venous access may allow success of the final procedure in system upgrading.

Background: Still increasing life expectancy in patients with implanted devices and large number of leads more and more often induce the need to cure the treatment complications or to change especially to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In order to prevent further complications, the possibility of damaged or redundant leads extraction should be taken into consideration. The aim of the paper was to assess the effectiveness and safety of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) with co-implantation of resynchronization systems. Methods and results: Between 2008 and March 2013, the system removal with TLE was conducted in 246 patients. In 38 patients (11 women, 28.9%), aged 43–79 (mean 65 years), it was combined with co-implantation of CRT-pacemaker or defibrillator (CRT-P/D). Indica­tions for TLE covered: lead failure in 21 (55.3%) patients, redundant leads in 6 (15.8%), and the occluded venous system in 7 (18.4%). The up-grade of the pacemaker or defibrillator system to CRT-D was performed in 19 cases, CRT-P/D revision in next 19. Together 32 defibrillation leads and 42 pacing leads (27 left ventricular leads, and 1 epicardial lead) were implanted. The intended clinical target — an effective resynchronization therapy — was obtained in all patients. There was no case of death or severe complications. In 2 cases of venous occlusion, the implantation on the contralateral side was required. Conclusions: TLE enables effective resynchronization therapy also in the case of the presence of too many leads, occlusion of the venous system or lead failure. Significant technical problems can occur especially in patients with venous system occlusion.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator function (CRT-D) along with an optimal medical therapy improves symptoms, cardiac efficiency, quality of life (QoL) and prognosis in patients with heart failure (CHF). The aim of the study was to assess effects of hospital-based and home-based/telemonitoring exercise training. Methods The prospective, randomized study was conducted in 52 patients (pts), aged 45–75years (mean 62±9.3), with CHF of ischemic or another etiology, NYHA class III and implanted CRT-D. Group CRT-Ex (n=26) underwent initial exercise training in the hospital setting and continued training program at home with telemonitoring 5 times a week for 8weeks. The CRT-control group (n=26) consisted of patients who had hospital rehabilitation, but no training program after discharge. Results No differences between the groups in CHF etiology, comorbidities, medical therapy and in any of spiroergometry (CPX) parameters at baseline were observed. After 3–4months the CRT-Ex group achieved better results in VO 2 peak, VCO 2 peak and treadmill test duration. But after 12months the measurements returned to the baseline values. No significant differences were observed directly between two groups in distances of 6-MWT at baseline, at 3–4months and at 12months. Echocardiographic evaluation showed significant reduction of left ventricular dimensions and improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), in both groups (25.3±7.4% to 28.9±9.1%, CRT-Ex group, p=0.0213 and 24.9±7.2% to 31.7±10.6%, CRT-Control group, p=0.0001). Significant improvement in all domains of QoL was observed in the CRT-Ex group, while the CRT-Control pts declared only higher energy levels and less pain. Intensity of telemonitoring guided home-based exercise training was low. In the 12- and 18-months follow-up there were no differences in the ICD-interventions, mortality or hospitalization rates between the groups. Conclusions A structured exercise training program in the hospital and home-based with telemonitoring was safe option of additional treatment and improved directly physical fitness and, quality of life in patients with NYHA III CHF and CRT-D. However these effects haven't been sustained in longer period of time and had no impact on prognosis.

WSTĘP Od czasu pierwszego zastosowania u czlowieka automatycznego kardiowertera-defibrylatora (ICD) w 1980 r. nastąpil znaczący postep technologiczny. Urządzenia z elektrodami wszczepialnymi nasierdziowo przez torakotomie zostaly zastąpione ukladami calkowicie przezzylnymi. Kolejne modyfikacje pozwolily na zastosowanie sterowania i stymulacji dwujamowej, a takze w poźniejszym okresie — terapii resynchronizującej. Istotny postep osiągnieto rowniez w zakresie konstrukcji elektrod endokawitarnych. Wspolczesne elektrody mają mniejszą średnice, są zbudowane z materialow zapewniających wiekszą wytrzymalośc, umozliwiają latwiejszą implantacje i powodują mniejszy odczyn zapalny w miejscu kontaktu z tkanką. Newralgicznym punktem ukladu jest miejsce polączenia elektrody z ICD. Powszechnie stosowany obecnie system IS-1/DF-1 wymaga dla elektrody defibrylującej 3 gniazd w glowicy ICD i koniecznośc mocowania kazdej z koncowek stymulującej i defibrylujących oddzielenie. Dla urządzen resynchronizujących, wymagających rowniez wejścia IS-1 dla elektrody przedsionkowej i lewokomorowej, potrzebne bylo zaprojektowanie glowicy mieszczącej 5 portow. Wprowadzany obecnie system z lącznikiem DF-4 elektrody ICD pozwala na polączenie w jednym porcie koncowki stymulującej prawokomorowej i 2 wejśc wysokoenergetycznych. Autorzy opisują wstepne doświadczenia z elektrodami ICD z lącznikami DF-4 w ICD z funkcją resynchronizacji (CRT-D).

Purpose Effectiveness of implantable defibrillators (ICD) has been proven with large randomized trials. Unfortunately, ICD discharge is painful and potentially threatening for the patient despite its life saving effects. We analyzed influence of the clinical parameters present before implantation on the effectiveness of antitachycardia pacing therapy (ATP) in terminating ventricular tachycardia (VT) slower than 200 bpm in the coronary artery disease patients with prophylactic implanted ICD in a single centre retrospective trial. Patients/methods We analyzed 121 consecutive coronary disease patients with ICD implanted in primary prophylaxis between 2001 and 2007, with the mean age of 62 ± 10 years. The mean follow-up was 876 ± 538 days. Results 32 of them had VT. In 27 persons (84.4%) at least one ATP attempt terminate VT. ATP was always successful in 21 patients. We analyzed age, sex, LVEF, NYHA class, widening of QRS complex, atrial fibrillation, type of myocardial infarction or diabetes. There were no significant differences in clinical features between patients with successful and unsuccessful ATP therapy. Conclusions High effectiveness of ATP was shown in this group. There were no clinical factors indicating success of this type of therapy. That could justify programming ATP as the first line therapy in the VT zone in primary prophylaxis coronary artery disease patients to reduce application of shock therapy. It should be possible to apply a single mode of programming when discharging patients after the implantation procedure regardless of the patient's clinical condition. This could help to control and programme the devices, thus reducing the risk of errors.

Background: The increasing number of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) contributes to the rising number of patients qualifying for a transvenous lead extraction (TLE) due to infection, vascular or lead failure related indications. The purpose of this study was to perform a retrospective analysis of the occurrence of conductor externalization in TLE patients and to assess the success rate in the extraction of these leads. Methods: TLE procedure was performed between 2012 and 2014 of 428 electrodes in 259 patients. Out of these, 143 (33.4%) leads in 138 (52.9%) patients were ICD leads. The indications for the TLE in ICD patients were: infection in 37 patients, lead failure in 84 patients, and others in 17 patients. Conductor externalization was observed in 8 ICD leads (5.6%) in 8 (5.8%) patients. The mean dwell­ing time for externalized leads was 87.9 (55 to 132) months compared to 60.1 (3 to 246) months of the remaining 135 ICD leads (p = 0.0329). All externalized leads were successfully and completely extracted using device traction, mechanical telescopic sheaths and/or autorotational cutting sheaths. No complica­tions of lead extraction procedures were observed in 8 patients with externalization. Results: Patients with lead externalization were often in a better New York Heart Association func­tional class (I or II) compared to those in the rest of the study group (p = 0.0212). Conclusions: Conductor externalization is a rare finding in patients undergoing TLE. This occurs with different manufacturers and lead types. In this complication transvenous lead extraction with the mechanical extraction tools can be safely performed.

This report presents a case of a 31-year-old male with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, ventricular septal defect (VSD) and complete heart block who was admitted to our institution because of an exacerbation of heart failure after pacemaker implantation. The ECG and chest radiograph revealed that the ventricular lead was placed in the middle cardiac vein. After cardiosurgical procedure (VSD closure and atrioventricular valves replacement), the clinical symptoms of heart failure were still present. They diminished while the patient was on escape rhythm (40–70 bpm). Therefore, the previously implanted leads were removed and the transvenous, biventricular system was implanted, which resulted in a significant clinical improvement.