1. Comparison between lithium dilution and pulse contour analysis techniques for cardiac output measurement in isoflurane anaesthetized ponies: influence of different inotropic drugs
- Author
-
Frederik Pille, Stijn Schauvliege, Lieven Vlaminck, Annelies Van den Eede, Luc Duchateau, and Frank Gasthuys
- Subjects
Male ,Cardiac output ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cardiotonic Agents ,Sedation ,Thermodilution ,Lithium ,Calcium Chloride ,Dobutamine ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Animals ,Enoximone ,Ketamine ,Horses ,Cardiac Output ,Romifidine ,Monitoring, Physiologic ,Cross-Over Studies ,Isoflurane ,General Veterinary ,business.industry ,Anesthesia ,Anesthetics, Inhalation ,Cardiology ,Midazolam ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Objective To compare cardiac output ( Q ˙ t ) measurements using lithium dilution (LiDCO) and pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) techniques in isoflurane‐anaesthetized ponies before and during the administration of different inotropic/vasoactive drugs. Study design Prospective randomized experimental cross‐over trial. Animals Six ponies aged 5.0 ± 1.6 (4–6.5) years and weighing 286 ± 53 (212–368) kg. Methods After sedation (romifidine) and induction (midazolam + ketamine), anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. After 90 minutes (= T0), one of four treatments was administered: saline 0.1 mL kg−1 (S), enoximone 0.5 mg kg−1 IV (E), enoximone followed by dobutamine (0.5 μg kg−1 minute−1 for 120 minutes) (ED) or enoximone followed by a calcium chloride infusion (0.5 mg kg−1 minute−1 for 10 minutes) (EC). Data were recorded for 120 minutes after T0. The PulseCO (recorded from carotid artery) was calibrated before T0, no further recalibrations were performed. Q ˙ t was determined with LiDCO ( Q ˙ t LiDCO) and PulseCO ( Q ˙ t PulseCO) simultaneously at T5, T10, T20, T40, T60, T80, T100 and T120. Systemic vascular resistances (SVRLiDCO and SVRPulseCO) were calculated. Results In the saline group, Q ˙ t PulseCO was 4.9 ± 12.3% lower than LiDCO (p < 0.01), whereas SVRPulseCO was 6.9 ± 14.4% higher than SVRLiDCO (p < 0.01). These differences increased over time (mean ± SEM), Q ˙ t by 0.06 ± 0.03% minute−1 (p = 0.042) and SVR by 0.08 ± 0.03% minute−1 (p = 0.018). Q ˙ t PulseCO was higher than Q ˙ t LiDCO in the EC group (1.8 ± 23.3%), but lower than Q ˙ t LiDCO in groups E (−11.7 ± 20.4%) and ED (−10.0 ± 25.9%) (significant difference between treatments, p Conclusions and clinical relevance Pulse contour analysis values deviated significantly from LiDCO measurements in isoflurane‐anaesthetized ponies. This difference was influenced by inotropic/vasoactive drugs.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF