Search

ObjectivesTo determine how many persons with knee pain have subsequent pain resolution and what factors are associated with resolution, focusing especially on types of physical activity.MethodsUsing data from MOST, an NIH funded longitudinal cohort study of persons with or at risk of knee osteoarthritis, we studied participants who at baseline reported knee pain on most days at both a telephone interview and clinic visit. We defined pain resolution if at 30 and 60 month exams, they reported no knee pain on most days and compared these participants to those who reported persistent pain later. In logistic regression analyses, we examined the association of baseline risk factors including demographic factors, BMI, depressive symptoms, isokinetic quadriceps strength and both overall physical activity (using the PASE survey) and specific activities including walking, gardening, and different intensities of recreational activities with pain resolution.ResultsOf 1,304 participants with knee pain on most days at baseline, 265 (20.3%) reported no knee pain at 30 and 60 months. Lower BMI and stronger quadriceps were associated with higher odds of pain resolution while overall physical activity was not. Of activities, walking decreased the odds of pain resolution (adjOR=0.86 (95% CI 0.76, 0.98)), but gardening (adjOR=1.59 (1.16, 2.18)) and moderate intensity recreational activities ((adjOR=1.24 (1.05, 1.46)) increased it.ConclusionPain resolution is common in those with knee pain. Factors increasing the odds of pain resolution include lower BMI, greater quadriceps strength and gardening and moderately intensive recreational activities.

ObjectiveTo determine the relationship of patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) to changes in performance-based function over 7 years.MethodsThere were 2666 participants (62.2 ± 8.0 yrs, BMI 30.6 ± 5.9 kg/m2, 60% female) from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study with knee radiographs at baseline who completed repeated chair stands and a 20-meter walk test (20MWT) at baseline, 2.5, 5, and 7 years. Generalized linear models assessed the relation of radiographic PFOA and radiographic PFOA with frequent knee pain to longitudinal changes in performance-based function. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, tibiofemoral OA, and injury/surgery.ResultsLinear models demonstrated a significant group-by-time interaction for the repeated chair stands (P = 0.04) and the 20MWT (P < 0.0001). Those with radiographic PFOA took 1.01 seconds longer on the repeated chair stands (P = 0.02) and 1.69 seconds longer on the 20MWT (P < 0.0001) at 7 years compared with baseline. When examining the relation of radiographic PFOA with frequent knee pain to performance-based function, there was a significant group-by-time interaction for repeated chair stands (P = 0.05) and the 20MWT (P < 0.0001). Those with radiographic PFOA with frequent knee pain increased their time on the repeated chair stands by 1.12 seconds (P = 0.04) and on the 20MWT by 1.91 seconds (P < 0.0001) over 7 years.ConclusionIndividuals with radiographic PFOA and those with radiographic PFOA with frequent knee pain have worsening of performance-based function over time. This knowledge may present opportunities to plan for early treatment strategies for PFOA to limit functional decline over time.

Previous research suggests individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) may experience autonomic dysfunction, however, this has not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the autonomic response to standing up (active orthostasis) and head-up tilt (passive orthostasis) in individuals with ID to a control group without ID. Eighteen individuals with and 18 individuals without ID were instrumented with an ECG-lead and finger-photoplethysmography for continuous heart rate and blood pressure recordings. The active and passive orthostasis protocol consisted of 10-min supine rest, 10-min standing, 10-min supine recovery, 5-min head-up tilt at 70, followed by 10-min supine recovery. The last 5 min of each position was used to calculate hemodynamic and autonomic function (time- and frequency-domain heart rate and blood pressure variability measures and baroreflex sensitivity). Individuals with ID had higher heart rate during baseline and recovery (P < 0.05), and an attenuated hemodynamic (stroke volume, heart rate) and heart rate variability response to active and passive orthostasis (interaction effect P < 0.05) compared with individuals without ID. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was higher in individuals with ID at all timepoints. Individuals with ID demonstrated altered hemodynamic and autonomic regulation compared with a sex- and age-matched control group, evidenced by a higher mean arterial pressure and a reduced response in parasympathetic modulation to active and passive orthostasis. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Individuals with ID demonstrated altered hemodynamic and autonomic regulation to the clinical autonomic function tasks standing up and head-up tilt (active and passive orthostasis). Higher resting heart rate and higher MAP throughout the protocol suggest a higher arousal level, and individuals with ID showed a blunted response in parasympathetic modulation. Further research should investigate the relationship of these findings with clinical outcomes.

ObjectiveTo examine the joint association of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behavior with the risk of developing functional limitation 4 years later in adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsUsing 48-month (baseline) accelerometry data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, we classified participants as Active-Low Sedentary (≥ 1 10-min bout/week of MVPA, lowest tertile for standardized sedentary time), Active-High Sedentary (≥ 1 10-min bout/week of MVPA, top 2 tertiles for standardized sedentary time), Inactive-Low Sedentary (zero 10-min bouts/week of MVPA, lowest tertile for standardized sedentary time), and Inactive-High Sedentary (zero 10-minute bouts/week of MVPA, top 2 tertiles for standardized sedentary time) groups. Functional limitation was defined as > 12 seconds for the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test (5XSST) and < 1.22 m/s gait speed during the 20-meter walk test. To investigate the association of exposure groups with risk of developing functional limitation 4 years later, we calculated adjusted risk ratios (aRR; adjusted for potential confounders).ResultsOf 1091 and 1133 participants without baseline functional limitation, based on the 5XSST and 20-meter walk test, respectively, 15% and 21% developed functional limitation 4 years later. The Inactive-Low Sedentary and Inactive-High Sedentary groups had increased risk of developing functional limitations compared to the Active-Low Sedentary and Active-High Sedentary groups. The Inactive-Low Sedentary group had 72% (aRR 1.72, 95% CI 1.00–2.94) and 52% (aRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.03–2.25) more risk of developing functional limitation based on the 5XSST and 20-meter walk test, respectively, compared to the Active-Low Sedentary group.ConclusionRegardless of sedentary category, being inactive (zero 10-min bouts/week in MVPA) may increase the risk of developing functional limitation in adults with knee OA.

OBJECTIVE: Adults with radiographic knee OA (rKOA) are at increased risk of mortality and walking difficulty may modify this relation. Little is known about specific aspects of walking difficulty that increase mortality risk. We investigated the association of walking speed (objective measure of walking difficulty) with mortality and examined the threshold that best discriminated this risk in adults with rKOA. METHODS: Participants with rKOA from the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project (JoCoOA, longitudinal population-based cohort), Osteoarthritis Initiative and Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (OAI and MOST, cohorts of individuals with or at high risk of knee OA) were included. Baseline speed was measured via 2.4-meter (m) walk test (short-distance) in JoCoOA and 20-m walk test (standard-distance) in OAI and MOST. To examine the association of walking speed with mortality risk over nine years, hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from Cox regression models adjusted for potential confounders., A Maximal Likelihood Ratio Chi-square Approach was utilized to identify an optimal threshold of walking speed predictive of mortality. RESULTS: Deaths after 9 years of follow-up occurred in 23.3% (290/1244) of JoCoOA and 5.9% (249/4215) of OAI+MOST. Walking 0.2 meters/second slower during short- and standard-distance walk tests was associated with 23% (aHR[95%CI]; 1.23[1.10, 1.39]) and 25% (1.25[1.09, 1.43]) higher mortality risk, respectively. Walking

Background Frail older surgical patients face more than a two-fold increase in postoperative complications, including myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, ileus, and others. Many of these complications occur because of postoperative loss of stamina and poor mobility. Preoperative exercise may better prepare these vulnerable patients for surgery. We present the protocol for our ongoing randomized trial to assess the impact of a preoperative walking intervention with remote coaching and pedometer on outcomes of stamina (six-minute walk distance- 6MWD) and mobility (postoperative steps) in older adults with frailty traits. Methods We will be conducting a randomized clinical trial with a total of 120 patients permitting up to a 33% rate of attrition, to reach a final sample size of 80 (with 40 patients for each study arm). We will include patients who are age 60 or higher, score 4 or greater on the Edmonton Frailty Scale assessment, and will be undergoing a surgical operation that requires a 2 or more night hospital stay to be eligible for our trial. Using block randomization stratified on baseline 6MWD, we will assign patients to wear a pedometer. At the end of three baseline days, an athletic trainer (AT) will provide a daily step count goal reflecting a 10–20% increase from baseline. Subsequently, the AT will call weekly to further titrate the goal or calls more frequently if the patient is not meeting the prescribed goal. Controls will receive general walking advice. Our main outcome is change in 6MWD on postoperative day (POD) 2/3 vs. baseline. We will also collect 6MWD approximately 4 weeks after surgery and daily in-hospital steps. Conclusion If changes in a 6MWD and step counts are significantly higher for the intervention group, we believe this will confirm our hypothesis that the intervention leads to decreased loss of stamina and mobility. Once confirmed, we anticipate expanding to multiple centers to assess the interventional impact on clinical endpoints. Trial registration The randomized clinical trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the identifier NCT03892187 on March 27, 2019.

DESIGN: Exploratory secondary data analysis of a pilot randomized control trial conducted between 2015 and 2017. SETTING: Outpatient physical therapy clinic in an academic setting. PARTICIPANTS: 43 participants were randomized to the intervention or control group. Both groups received standard physical therapy (PT) after total knee replacement (TKR). INTERVENTIONS: Participants in the intervention group received a Fitbit, weekly step goals from their physical therapist, and up to six monthly phone calls after their discharge from PT (DC). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome, change in sedentary time (∆SED), was measured using a triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X) from initial evaluation (IE) to DC (short-term), and IE to 12 months (12M) after DC (long-term). Positive values represent a reduction in SED. We compared the short- and long-term ∆SED between the intervention and control groups using independent t-tests. RESULTS: Of the 43 participants [mean(SD) age 67.0 (7.0) years, BMI 31.5 (5.9) kg/m(2), 53% female], 36 participants had data at IE and DC (18 intervention, 18 control) and 27 had data at IE and 12M (12 intervention, 15 control). The between group difference in short-term ∆SED was [mean(95%CI)] 32.9 (−14.4, 80.1) minutes/day. The between group difference in long-term ∆SED was 59.2 (8.6, 109.7) minutes/day. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results indicate that a physical therapist-administered physical activity intervention may reduce SED in adults after TKR. However, a full-clinical trial is needed to establish the effect on SED.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to determine the relationship of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected features of patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis to pain and functional outcomes.METHODS: We sampled 1,099 participants from the 60-month visit of the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (mean ± SD age: 66.8 ± 7.5 years; body mass index: 29.6 ± 4.8; 65% female). We determined the prevalence of MRI-detected features of patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (eg, cartilage damage, bone marrow lesions, and osteophytes) and assessed the relationship between these features and knee pain severity, knee pain on stairs, chair stand time, and walking less than 6,000 steps per day. We evaluated the relationship of MRI features to each outcome using logistic and linear regression, adjusting for potential covariates.RESULTS: Participants with cartilage damage in 3-4 subregions had the highest mean pain severity (22.0/100; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.6-26.4 mm). They also showed higher odds of having at least mild pain on stairs (odds ratio [OR]: 3.3; 95% CI: 1.7-6.5) and of walking less than 6,000 steps per day (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1-4.4) compared with those without cartilage damage. Participants with bone marrow lesions in 3-4 subregions had higher odds of at least mild pain on stairs than those without (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 2.2-5.2). Participants with osteophytes in 3-4 subregions also had higher odds of walking less than 6,000 steps/day (OR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.3-3.5, respectively).CONCLUSION: MRI-detected features of osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint are related to pain and functional performance. This knowledge highlights the need to develop treatments for those with patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis to improve pain and maximize function.

Objective\ud Therapeutic exercise is a recommended first‐line treatment for people with knee and hip osteoarthritis. However, there is little specific advice or practical resources to guide clinicians in its implementation. As the first in a series of projects by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International Rehabilitation Discussion Group to address this gap, we aim to synthesize current literature informing the implementation of therapeutic exercise for people with knee and hip osteoarthritis.\ud \ud Methods\ud Narrative review focusing on evidence from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials.\ud \ud Results\ud Therapeutic exercise is safe for people with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Numerous types of therapeutic exercise (including aerobic, strengthening, neuromuscular, mind‐body exercise) may be utilised at varying doses and in different settings to improve pain and function. Benefits from therapeutic exercise appear greater when dosage recommendations from general exercise guidelines for healthy adults are met. However, interim therapeutic exercise goals may also be useful, given that many barriers to achieving these dosages exist among this patient group. Theoretically‐informed strategies to improve adherence to therapeutic exercise, such as patient education, goal setting, monitoring and feedback, may help maintain participation and optimise clinical benefits over the longer‐term. Sedentary behaviour is also a risk factor for disability and lower quality of life in people with knee and hip osteoarthritis, although limited evidence exists regarding how best to reduce this behaviour.\ud \ud Conclusion\ud Current evidence can be used to inform how to implement best practice therapeutic exercise, at a sufficient and appropriate dose, for people with knee and hip osteoarthritis.

The emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in unprecedented changes in how the world socially interacts. Limits on contact with others, whether by social distancing or shelter-at-home recommendations, have negatively affected physical activity (PA); this is especially true for adults over the age of 60 who are at high risk of serious illness from COVID-19.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) supports blood-based genomic profiling but is not yet routinely implemented in the setting of a phase I trials clinic. TARGET is a molecular profiling program with the primary aim to match patients with a broad range of advanced cancers to early phase clinical trials on the basis of analysis of both somatic mutations and copy number alterations (CNA) across a 641 cancer-associated-gene panel in a single ctDNA assay. For the first 100 TARGET patients, ctDNA data showed good concordance with matched tumor and results were turned round within a clinically acceptable timeframe for Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) review. When a 2.5% variant allele frequency (VAF) threshold was applied, actionable mutations were identified in 41 of 100 patients, and 11 of these patients received a matched therapy. These data support the application of ctDNA in this early phase trial setting where broad genomic profiling of contemporaneous tumor material enhances patient stratification to novel therapies and provides a practical template for bringing routinely applied blood-based analyses to the clinic.

The objective was to examine bidirectional associations of accelerometer estimated sedentary time and physical activity with reported knee symptoms. Participants were 2,034 adults (mean age 45.3 ± 3.6 years, 58.7% female) from CARDIA. Generalized estimating equations for logistic regression and linear mixed regression models examined associations of accelerometer estimated sedentary time, light-intensity physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) at baseline (2005–06) with knee discomfort, pain, stiffness, and physical function (yes/no and continuous scores from short-form WOMAC function scale) at the 5- and 10-year follow-up exams. Linear regression models examined associations between knee symptoms at the 5-year follow-up with accelerometer estimates at the 10-year follow-up. Models were adjusted for confounders; individuals with comorbidities were excluded in sensitivity analyses. A 30 min/day increment in sedentary time at baseline was associated with lower odds of knee symptoms at the 5- and 10-year follow-up (OR: 0.95, 95% CI range: 0.92–0.98), while LPA and MVPA were associated with greater odds of knee symptoms (LPA OR range: 1.04–1.05, 95% CI range: 1.01–1.09; MVPA OR range: 1.17–1.19, 95% CI range: 1.06–1.32). Report of knee symptoms at the 5-year follow-up was associated with 13.52–17.51 (95% CI range: −29.90, −0.56) fewer minutes/day of sedentary time and 14.58–17.51 (95% CI range: 2.48, 29.38) more minutes/day of LPA at the 10-year follow-up, compared to those reporting no symptoms. Many associations were no longer statistically significant when excluding individuals with comorbidities. Findings support a bidirectional association of accelerometer estimated sedentary time and physical activity with knee symptoms across midlife.

Background Moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) is associated with favorable self-rated mental and physical health. Conversely, poor self-rated health in these domains could precede unfavorable shifts in activity. We evaluated bidirectional associations of accelerometer-estimated time spent in stationary behavior (SB), light intensity physical activity (LPA), and MVPA with self-rated health over 10 years in in the CARDIA longitudinal cohort study. Methods Participants (n = 894, age: 45.1 ± 3.5; 63% female; 38% black) with valid accelerometry wear and self-rated health at baseline (2005–6) and 10-year follow-up (2015–6) were included. Accelerometry data were harmonized between exams and measured mean total activity and duration (min/day) in SB, LPA, and MVPA; duration (min/day) in long-bout and short-bout SB (≥30 min vs. Results Over 10-years, average (SD) MCS increased 1.05 (9.07) points, PCS decreased by 1.54 (7.30) points, and activity shifted toward greater SB and less mean total activity, LPA, and MVPA (all p p = 0.021), while baseline mean total activity, MVPA, and long-bout MVPA were associated with greater 10-year changes in PCS (+ 0.53 to + 1.47 points, all p p = 0.040, and + 15.66 cpm, p p p Conclusions The presence of bidirectional associations between SB and activity with self-rated health suggests that individuals with low overall activity levels and poor self-rated health are at high risk for further declines and supports intervention programming that aims to dually increase activity levels and improve self-rated health.

Objective To examine the association of the volume and intensity of daily walking at baseline with the risk of knee replacement (KR) over 5 years in adults with advanced structural knee osteoarthritis. Design Prospective, longitudinal, and multicenter observational study. Setting Osteoarthritis Initiative study with follow-up from 2008-2015. Participants Community-dwelling adults with or at risk of knee osteoarthritis were recruited from 4 sites in the United States (N=516; mean age, 67.7±8.6y; body mass index, 29.3±4.7 kg/m2; 52% female). We included participants with advanced structural disease, without KR and had valid daily walking data (quantified using Actigraph GT1M), at baseline. Interventions Not applicable. Main outcomes KR. Walking volume was measured as steps/day and intensity as minutes/day spent not walking (0 steps/min) and walking at very light (1-49 steps/min), light (50-100 steps/min), or moderate (>100 steps/min) intensities. To examine the relationship of walking volume and intensity with the risk of KR, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusting for covariates. Results Of 516 adults with advanced structural disease, 88 received a KR over 5 years (17%). Walking an additional 1000 steps/d was not associated with the risk of KR (adjusted HR=0.95; 95% CI, 0.84-1.04). Statistically, replacing 10 min/d of very light and light walking with 10 min/d of moderate walking reduced the risk of KR incidence by 35% and 37%, respectively (adjusted HR=0.65, 95% CI, 0.45-0.94, for very light and adjusted HR=0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00, for light). Conclusions Daily walking volume and intensity did not increase KR risk over 5 years and may be protective in some cases in adults with advanced structural knee osteoarthritis.

Background The purpose of this prospective case series study was to compare changes in early postoperative physical activity and physical function between 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months after lumbar spine surgery. Methods Fifty-three patients (mean [95% confidence interval; CI] age = 59.2 [56.2, 62.3] years, 64% female) who underwent spine surgery for a degenerative lumbar condition were assessed at 6 weeks and 3- and 6-months after surgery. The outcomes were objectively-measured physical activity (accelerometry) and patient-reported and objective physical function. Physical activity was assessed using mean steps/day and time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) over a week. Physical function measures included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and 10-Meter Walk (10 MW). We compared changes over time in physical activity and function using generalized estimating equations with robust estimator and first-order autoregressive covariance structure. Proportion of patients who engaged in meaningful physical activity (e.g., walked at least 4400 and 6000 steps/day or engaged in at least 150 min/week in MVPA) and achieved clinically meaningful changes in physical function were compared at 3 and 6 months. Results After surgery, 72% of patients initiated physical therapy (mean [95%CI] sessions =8.5 [6.6, 10.4]) between 6 weeks and 3 months. Compared to 6 weeks post-surgery, no change in steps/day or time in MVPA/week was observed at 3 or 6 months. From 21 to 23% and 9 to 11% of participants walked at least 4400 and 6000 steps/day at 3 and 6 months, respectively, while none of the participants spent at least 150 min/week in MVPA at these same time points. Significant improvements were observed on ODI, SF-12, TUG and 10 MW (p Conclusion Limited improvement was observed in objectively-measured physical activity from 6 weeks to 6 months after spine surgery, despite moderate to large function gains. Early postoperative physical therapy interventions targeting physical activity may be needed.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a serious disease and has no cure to date. Knee OA is a leading cause of functional limitation (e.g., difficulty walking). Walking speed is 1 method of quantifying difficulty with walking and should be assessed in clinical practice for adults with knee OA because it has prognostic value and is modifiable. Specifically, slow walking speed is associated with increased risk of adverse health outcomes, including all-cause mortality in adults with knee OA and can be modified by engaging in physical activity or exercise. However, at present, there is little consensus on the distance and instructions used to conduct the walk test. Distance is often selected based on space availability, and instruction varies, from asking the participants to walk at a comfortable pace versus as fast as possible. Therefore, the purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the measurement properties, strengths, and limitations of a fixed-distance walk test ≤ 40 meters in adults with knee OA. Good measurement properties in terms of reliability and validity were observed across the different testing protocols for fixed-distance walk test (i.e., any distance ≤ 40 m and fast- or self-paced). Therefore, clinicians and researchers can select a testing protocol that can safely and consistently be performed over time, as well as provide a practice trial to acclimatize the patients to the fixed-distance walk test.

BACKGROUND: Physical therapy (PT) is recommended to reduce pain and improve function. However, only 10-15% of adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA) use PT in the US. The purpose of this study was to explore patient-reported barriers and facilitators to PT utilization for knee osteoarthritis, to understand why PT is underutilized. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews was conducted. One-on-one, phone interviews with adults from local community centers. Participants were eligible if they were fluent in English and self-reported knee OA 1) over 45 years of age, 2) have activity-related knee pain, and 3) no morning stiffness or morning stiffness in the knee(s) for ≤30 minutes. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. To identify barriers and facilitators to PT utilization for knee OA, a coding framework, thematic analysis, and a constant comparative approach were used. RESULTS: Of 22 participants with health insurance and who participated, 59% were considering PT, 23% refused PT, and 18% used PT for knee OA. Themes identified as either barriers or facilitators for participants were 1) previous experience with PT, 2) physician referral, 3) beliefs about treatment efficacy before and after knee replacement surgery, 4) insurance coverage, and 5) preference to avoid surgery. CONCLUSION: A previous positive encounter with PT and a physician referral may facilitate PT utilization for adults with knee OA. Knowledge about and access to PT services were not identified as barriers related to PT utilization. Further research is necessary to confirm findings in a broader group of adults with knee OA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable for qualitative research

Objective To explore the feasibility, fidelity, safety, and preliminary outcomes of a physical therapist-administered physical activity (PA) intervention after total knee replacement (TKR). Methods People who had undergone a unilateral TKR and were receiving outpatient physical therapy (PT) were randomized to a control or intervention group. Both groups received standard PT for TKR. The intervention included being provided with a Fitbit Zip, step goals, and 1 phone call a month for 6 months after discharge from PT. Feasibility was measured by rates of recruitment and retention, safety was measured by the frequency of adverse events, and fidelity was measured by adherence to the weekly steps/day goal created by the physical therapist and participant monitoring of steps/day. An Actigraph GT3X measured PA, which was quantified as steps/day and minutes/week of engaging in moderate-to-vigorous PA. Our preliminary outcome was the difference in PA 6 months after discharge from PT between the control and intervention groups. Results Of the 43 individuals who were enrolled, 53.4% were women, the mean ± SD age was 67.0 ± 7.0 years, and the mean ± SD body mass index was 31.5 ± 5.9 kg/m2 . For both the control and intervention groups, the recruitment and retention rates were 64% and 83.7%, respectively, and adherence to the intervention ranged from 45% to 60%. No study-related adverse events occurred. The patients in the intervention group accumulated a mean 1,798 more steps/day (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 240, 3,355) and spent 73.4 more minutes/week (95% CI -14.1, 160.9) engaging in moderate-to-vigorous PA at 6 months than those in the control group. Conclusion A physical therapist-administered PA intervention is feasible and safe, demonstrates treatment fidelity, and may increase PA after TKR. Future research is needed to establish the effectiveness of the intervention.

Objective.To investigate an 8-year change in waist circumference (WC) with the risk of incident low physical function over 1 year in adults with, or at risk of, knee osteoarthritis (OA).Methods.Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative were used. Change in WC was measured from study enrollment (0 month) to the 96-month visit and classified as Increase (≥ 5cm gain) or Maintain (< 5cm gain). We identified World Health Organization (WHO) risk category based on WC at study enrollment as Large WC (males ≥ 102 cm, females ≥ 88 cm) or Small WC (males < 102 cm, females < 88 cm). The outcome was incident low physical function (≥ 28 Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index physical function subscale) at the 108-month visit. To investigate the association of the 8-year change in WC with the risk of low physical function, we calculated risk ratios (95% CI) and adjusted for potential confounders. We repeated the analyses stratified by the WHO disease risk category.Results.The Increase WC group had 1.43 (95% CI 1.04–1.96) times the risk of incident low physical function compared to adults in the Maintain WC group. Adults with a Large WC at baseline who increased WC had 1.55 (95% CI 1.00–2.37) times the risk of incident low physical function compared to those who maintained WC. Adults with a Small WC at baseline who increased WC had 1.97 (95% CI 0.84–4.63) times the risk compared to those who maintained WC.Conclusion.Increasing WC increases the risk of incident low physical function in the following year. Maintaining WC may mitigate developing low physical function.

Objective To compare objectively measured physical activity in older adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) with similarly aged adults without osteoarthritis (OA) or knee symptoms from the general population. Methods We included people ages 50-85 years with symptomatic knee OA from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI, n = 491), and ages 50-85 years from the general population using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, n = 449) data. A uniaxial accelerometer was worn for ≥10 hours/day for ≥4 days in the NHANES group in 2003-2004 and in the OAI group in 2008-2010. We calculated time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA in minutes/day) and described differences in MVPA and demographic variables between the samples. We conducted matched-pairs sensitivity analyses to further evaluate the role of potential confounders. Results Both cohorts had similarly low levels of physical activity in age- and sex-specific strata. Time in MVPA ranged from a median of 1-22 minutes/day in people with symptomatic knee OA, and from 1-24 minutes/day in the general population without OA or knee pain. These results were similar in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Time spent in MVPA was similarly low in those with symptomatic knee OA as in older adults without knee pain or OA.

Background The definitive treatment for knee osteoarthritis is a total knee replacement, which results in a clinically meaningful improvement in pain and physical function. However, evidence suggests that physical activity (PA) remains unchanged after total knee replacement (TKR). Objective The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy, fidelity, and safety of a physical therapist–administered PA intervention for people after TKR. Design This study will be a randomized controlled trial. Setting The setting is an outpatient physical therapy clinic. Participants The participants are 125 individuals who are over the age of 45 and are seeking outpatient physical therapy following a unilateral TKR. Intervention In addition to standardized physical therapy after TKR, the intervention group will receive, during physical therapy, a weekly PA intervention that includes a wearable activity tracking device, individualized step goals, and face-to-face feedback provided by a physical therapist. Control The control group will receive standardized physical therapy alone after TKR. Measurements The efficacy of the intervention will be measured as minutes per week spent in moderate to vigorous PA at enrollment, at discharge, and at 6 months and 12 months after discharge from physical therapy. The fidelity and safety of the intervention will be assessed throughout the study. Limitations Participants will not be masked, PA data will be collected after randomization, and the trial will be conducted at a single site. Conclusions The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to increase PA after TKR. A protocol for investigating the efficacy, fidelity, and safety of a physical therapist–administered PA intervention for people after TKR is presented. The findings will be used to support a large multisite clinical trial to test the effectiveness, implementation, and cost of this intervention.

Arterial stiffness is related to the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and increases with aging. Functional impairment of the arterial wall can occur before structural changes and can be detectable before CVD symptoms. The elastic properties of the carotid arterial wall during the cardiac cycle can be evaluated by standard 2-dimensional (2D) ultrasound longitudinal or circumferential imaging of vascular deformation (strain) using speckle tracking. The purpose of this study was to compare standard 2D ultrasound circumferential and longitudinal images of vascular tissue motion and strain using speckle tracking in young and older individuals. Participants underwent recording of 2D ultrasound circumferential and longitudinal images of the common carotid artery. Circumferential carotid strain (CS) and CS rate were obtained and analyzed via speckle tracking software. Following the strain analysis, the circumferential strain β-stiffness (C-β) was calculated. Conventional longitudinal β-stiffness (L-β) was calculated and non-invasive blood pressure measurements were obtained from carotid artery pressure measurements in a resting supine position using applanation tonometry. C-β was significantly higher than L-β, and the association with age was greater (r = .824 vs. r = .547). CS and CS rate were significantly higher in the young compared to the older group. L-β does not explain as much of the age-dependent differences in the carotid artery compared with C-β. This is possibly due to the inclusion of whole arterial wall motion and deformation observed in the CS image. The ability of C-β to accurately predict the future risk of CVD independent of age still needs further investigation.

Objective To investigate the association of slow gait speed, defined as walking slower than is necessary for the community, with trajectories of depressive symptoms over 7 years among people with or at high risk of knee OA. Methods Using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, we described trajectories of depressive symptoms measured annually with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. We categorized speed during a 20-meter walk of

OBJECTIVE Knee cartilage damage is often linked to mechanical overloading. However, cartilage requires mechanical load to remain healthy, suggesting that underloading may be detrimental. This study was undertaken to examine knee overloading and underloading by defining cumulative load as the joint effects of body mass index (BMI) and daily walking, and examine the relationship between cumulative load and worsening cartilage damage over 2 years. METHODS We used data from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. Steps/day, measured by accelerometry, and BMI were calculated at the 60-month visit. Cartilage damage on magnetic resonance imaging was semiquantitatively scored using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) at the 60-month and 84-month visits; worsening damage was defined as increased WORMS between visits. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using binomial regression, with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS Our study included 964 participants, 62% of whom were female, with a mean ± SD age of 66.9 ± 7.5 years. Participants had a mean ± SD BMI of 29.7 ± 4.8 kg/m2 and walked a mean ± SD of 7,153 ± 2,591 steps/day. Participants who walked a moderate number of steps/day (6,000-7,900) or a high number of steps/day (>7,900) and had a high BMI (>31 kg/m2 ) had a greater risk of worsening medial tibiofemoral (TF) damage (RR 2.83 [95% CI 1.46-5.48] and RR 2.61 [95% CI 1.50-4.54], respectively) compared with those who walked similar steps/day and had a low BMI (18-27 kg/m2 ). Participants with a low number of steps/day (

Objective To develop an evidence-based guideline for the comprehensive management of osteoarthritis (OA) as a collaboration between the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the Arthritis Foundation, updating the 2012 ACR recommendations for the management of hand, hip, and knee OA. Methods We identified clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes questions and critical outcomes in OA. A Literature Review Team performed a systematic literature review to summarize evidence supporting the benefits and harms of available educational, behavioral, psychosocial, physical, mind-body, and pharmacologic therapies for OA. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to rate the quality of the evidence. A Voting Panel, including rheumatologists, an internist, physical and occupational therapists, and patients, achieved consensus on the recommendations. Results Based on the available evidence, either strong or conditional recommendations were made for or against the approaches evaluated. Strong recommendations were made for exercise, weight loss in patients with knee and/or hip OA who are overweight or obese, self-efficacy and self-management programs, tai chi, cane use, hand orthoses for first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint OA, tibiofemoral bracing for tibiofemoral knee OA, topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for knee OA, oral NSAIDs, and intraarticular glucocorticoid injections for knee OA. Conditional recommendations were made for balance exercises, yoga, cognitive behavioral therapy, kinesiotaping for first CMC OA, orthoses for hand joints other than the first CMC joint, patellofemoral bracing for patellofemoral knee OA, acupuncture, thermal modalities, radiofrequency ablation for knee OA, topical NSAIDs, intraarticular steroid injections and chondroitin sulfate for hand OA, topical capsaicin for knee OA, acetaminophen, duloxetine, and tramadol. Conclusion This guideline provides direction for clinicians and patients making treatment decisions for the management of OA. Clinicians and patients should engage in shared decision-making that accounts for patients' values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies.

Vascular resistance and conductance are reciprocal indices of vascular tone that are often assumed to be interchangeable. However, in most animals in vivo, blood flow (i.e. cardiac output) typically varies much more than arterial blood pressure. When blood flow changes at a constant pressure, the relationship between conductance and blood flow is linear, whereas the relationship between resistance and blood flow is non-linear. Thus, for a given change in blood flow, the change in resistance depends on the starting point, whereas the attendant change in conductance is proportional to the change in blood flow regardless of the starting conditions. By comparing the effects of physical activity at different temperatures or between species – concepts at the heart of comparative cardiovascular physiology – we demonstrate that the difference between choosing resistance or conductance can be marked. We also explain here how the ratio of conductance in the pulmonary and systemic circulations provides a more intuitive description of cardiac shunt patterns in the reptilian cardiovascular system than the more commonly used ratio of resistance. Finally, we posit that, although the decision to use conductance or resistance should be made on a case-by-case basis, in most circumstances, conductance is a more faithful portrayal of cardiovascular regulation in vertebrates.

This is the accepted version of the following article: Oiestad, B. E., White, D. K., Booton, R., Niu, J., Zhang, Y., Torner, J., ... & Felson, D. T. (2015). The longitudinal course of physical function in people with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: Data from the MOST study and the OAI. Arthritis care & research., which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22674

Objective: with adults working to older ages, occupation is an important, yet less modifiable domain of physical activity to consider in the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to investigate the association between predominant lifetime occupation and prevalent knee OA.Design: participant-level data were used from five international community-based cohorts: Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project, the Hertfordshire Cohort Study, the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study, the Tasmanian Cohort Study and Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Self-reported predominant occupation was categorized into sedentary, light, light manual and heavy manual levels. Cross-sectional associations between predominant lifetime occupation and knee OA outcomes including prevalence of radiographic knee OA (RKOA), symptomatic RKOA and knee pain, were assessed using logistic regression, accounting for cohort clustering.Results: data for 7391 participants were included. 24.7% reported sedentary lifetime occupation, 30.0% light, 35.9% light manual and 9.4% heavy manual. 43.3% presented with RKOA, 52.1% with knee pain and 29.0% with symptomatic RKOA. There was over a two-fold increase in the odds of having RKOA, knee pain and symptomatic RKOA in those whose with heavy manual compared to sedentary occupations ((odds ratio (OR): 2.14; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.79, 2.58), (OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.78, 2.70), (OR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.94, 2.99) respectively).Conclusion: this large international multi-cohort study demonstrated an association of heavy manual work with RKOA, symptomatic RKOA and knee pain. Measures that protect workers and are designed to reduce heavy manual related activities remain a priority to reduce the risk of knee OA.

The importance of sex differences in the control of blood pressure responses to exercise is controversial. It is unknown whether the potential sex differences are a result of magnitude differences in forward or reflected pressure waves. The purpose of this study was to investigate sex differences in BP following acute exercise using wave separation analysis. Sixty-eight adults (36 females) participated in the study. Aerobic capacity was measured during a graded cycle ergometry test. Central pulse wave analysis was derived from the radial pulse using applanation tonometry and separated into forward and reflected pressure waves before, and 15 min and 30 min after maximum aerobic exercise. Both males and females exhibited significantly decreased brachial SBP (p

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the functional status of patients 12 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who underwent progressive strengthening or standard of care rehabilitation to older adults without knee joint pain. METHODS: This cross-sectional design study included 165 participants in the progressive strengthening group, 40 participants in the standard of care group, and 88 older adults (control group). The Knee Outcome Survey – Activity of Daily Living, knee active range of motion (ROM), quadriceps strength, and performance tests were compared between groups using a one-way ANOVA. The proportions of participants in both TKA groups who achieved the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the control group were compared using a Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: Significant between-group effects were found for all variables (p < 0.001). The control group had better outcomes than both the progressive strengthening and standard of care groups (p < 0.001). Compared to the standard of care group, a higher proportion of participants in the progressive strengthening group achieved the lower bound cutoff for active knee extension ROM (p = 0.042), quadriceps strength (p = 0.032), and stair climbing time (p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: More participants in the progressive strengthening group had physical function that was similar to the healthy control group, when compared to the standard of care group. Progressive strengthening rehabilitation may be more effective in restoring normative levels of function after TKA than standard of care.

OBJECTIVE: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a risk factor for a decline in gait speed. Daily walking reduces the risk of developing slow gait speed and future persistent functional limitation. However, the protective role of walking intensity is unclear. We investigated the association of substituting time spent not walking, with walking at light and moderate-to-vigorous intensities for incident slow gait over two-years, among people with or at high risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHOD: We used baseline and two-year follow-up data from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) study (n=1731) and the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI, n=1925). Daily walking intensity was objectively assessed using accelerometer-enabled devices, and classified as; not walking (100 steps/min). We defined slow gait during a 20–meter walk, as 100 steps/min) may be best recommended in order to reduce the risk of developing critical slow gait speed among people with, or at high risk of knee OA.

Optimal management of osteoarthritis (OA) requires a combination of therapies, with behavioral (e.g., exercise and weight management) and rehabilitative components at the core, accompanied by pharmacological treatments and, in later stages, consideration of joint replacement surgery. Although multiple sets of OA treatment guidelines have been developed, there are gaps in the implementation of these recommendations. Key areas of concern include the underuse of exercise, weight management, and other behavioral and rehabilitation strategies as well as the overuse of opioid analgesics. In this review, we describe the major categories of treatment strategies for OA, including self-management, physical activity, weight management, physical therapy and other rehabilitative therapies, pharmacotherapies, and joint replacement surgery. For each category, we discuss the current evidence base to report on appropriate use, data regarding adherence to treatment recommendations, and potential approaches to optimize use.

To describe levels of physical activity among older adults residing at assisted care facilities and their association with physical function. Cross-sectional analysis. Assisted care facilities within the greater Boston, MA area. Older adults aged 65 years and older (N = 65). Physical Activity Level (PAL) as defined by quartiles from accelerometry (counts and steps), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Score, gait speed, and handgrip strength. Participants in the most active accelerometry quartile engaged in 25 minutes/week of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and walked 2,150 steps/day. These individuals had an SPPB score, 400 meter walk speed, and handgrip strength that was 3.7–3.9 points, 0.3–0.4 meters/second, and 4.5–5.1 kg greater respectively, than individuals in the lowest activity quartile, who engaged in less than 5 min/wk of MVPA or took fewer than 460 steps/day. Despite engaging in physical activity levels far below current recommendations (150 min/week of MVPA or > 7000 steps/day), the most active older adults in this study exhibited clinically significant differences in physical function relative to their less active peers. While the direction of causality cannot be determined from this cross-sectional study, these findings suggest a strong association between PAL and physical function among older adults residing in an assisted care facility.

Background: It is unclear whether an intensive program of weight loss combined with exercise prevents the onset of knee pain among those at high risk. We examined whether an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) prevents incident knee pain compared with a diabetes support and education (DSE) comparison group among overweight adults with diabetes. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) study, which is a randomized intervention trial of adults who were obese and had type 2 diabetes starting in 2001. We studied a sub-cohort of 2889 who reported no knee pain at baseline, but were at high risk due to obesity. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated to examine the association of ILI vs. DSE with incident knee pain at year 1 and 4. All analyses were adjusted for potential confounders. Results: Age, sex, and BMI were similar among ILI and DSE participants with no knee pain at baseline. At year 1, ILI participants were 15% less likely to develop knee pain compared with DSE participants (RR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.74, 0.98]). At year 4, this decreased to 5% and was no longer statistically significant. Conclusions: An intensive lifestyle intervention of diet and exercise may prevent the development of knee pain among those at high risk in the short-term. Health care providers may consider recommending diet and exercise as a means to prevent the development of knee pain among those at high risk. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Objective.We investigated the association between objectively measured daily walking and knee structural change, defined either as radiographic worsening or as cartilage loss, in people at risk of or with knee osteoarthritis (OA).Methods.Participants from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) with Kellgren-Lawrence grades 0–2 and daily walking (measured with the StepWatch) at the 60-month visit were included. Participants had fixed-flexion, weight-bearing radiographs and knee magnetic resonance images (MRI) at 60 and 84 months. Radiographic worsening was read in both knees using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading, and MRI were read for 1 knee using the Whole-Organ MRI Score semiquantitative scoring. OR and 95% CI were calculated comparing those in the middle tertile against the lowest and highest tertiles of daily walking using logistic regression models and generalized estimating equations. Data on walking with moderate to vigorous intensity (min with > 100 steps/min/day) were associated to structural change using multivariate and logistic regression models.Results.The 1179 study participants (59% women) were 67.0 years old (± 7.6), with a mean (± SD) body mass index of 29.8 kg/m2 (± 5.3) who walked 6981 (± 2630) steps/day. After adjusting for confounders, we found no significant associations between daily walking and radiographic worsening or cartilage loss. More time spent walking at a moderate to vigorous intensity was not associated with either radiographic worsening or cartilage loss.Conclusion.Results from the MOST study indicated no association between daily walking and structural changes over 2 years in the knees of people at risk of or with mild knee OA.

Background/Objective Current preoperative assessment tools such as the American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS Calculator) are suboptimal for evaluating older adults. The objective was to evaluate and compare the performance of the ACS Calculator for predicting risk of serious postoperative complications with the addition of self-reported physical function versus a frailty score. Design Prospective cohort. Setting Two tertiary care academic medical centers in Massachusetts. Participants Individuals aged 65 and older undergoing any surgery with a risk of serious complication of 5% or greater (N = 403). Measurements We measured self-reported physical function using the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI FUNCTION) and frailty phenotype (FP), which has a score ranging from 0 to 5 based on slow gait speed, weak handgrip, exhaustion, weight loss, or low activity. Using c-statistic and net classification improvement (NRI), we then analyzed capability of LLFDI-FUNCTION versus FP to improve the ACS Calculator for predicting an adverse postoperative course (serious complication, discharge to nursing home, readmission, death within 30 days of surgery). Increase in c-statistic and net reclassification improvement (NRI) for LLFDI-FUNCTION versus FP in addition to the ACS Calculator for predicting an adverse postoperative course (serious complication, discharge to nursing home, readmission, death within 30 days of surgery) Results Over 30 days, 26% of participants developed an adverse postoperative course. The increase in c-statistic for the ACS Calculator (baseline value 0.645) was slightly greater with LLFDI-FUNCTION (0.076) than with FP (0.058), with a bootstrapped difference in c-statistic of 0.005 (95% confidence interval = 0.002–0.007). NRI was also better with LLFDI-FUNCTION. Conclusion The LLFDI-FUNCTION predicted postoperative complications slightly better than the FP. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and validate the use of the LLFDI-FUNCTION with the ACS Calculator for preoperative assessments of older adults.

Objective Evidence of physical function difficulties, such as difficulty rising from a chair, may limit daily walking for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to identify minimum performance thresholds on clinical tests of physical function predictive to walk ≥6000 steps/day. This benchmark is known to discriminate people with knee OA who develop functional limitation over time from those who do not. Methods Using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, we quantified daily walking as average steps/day from an accelerometer (Actigraph GTM1) worn for >10 hours/day over one week. Physical function was quantified using three performance-based clinical tests: five times sit to stand test, walking speed (tested over 20 meters) and 400-meter walk test. To identify minimum performance thresholds for daily walking, we calculated physical function values corresponding to high specificity (80 to 95%) to predict walking ≥6000 steps/day. Results Among 1925 participants (age [mean±sd] 65.1±9.1 years, BMI 28.4±4.8 kg/m2, 55% female) with valid accelerometer data, 54.9% walked ≥6000 steps/day. High specificity thresholds of physical function for walking ≥6000 steps/day ranged from 11.4 to 14.0 sec on the five times sit to stand test, 1.13 to 1.26 meters/sec for walking speed, or 315 to 349 sec on the 400-meter walk test. Conclusion Not meeting these minimum performance thresholds on clinical tests of physical function may indicate inadequate physical ability to walk ≥6000 steps/day for people with knee OA. Rehabilitation may be indicated to address underlying impairments limiting physical function. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.