Search

Unfortunately, suppuration of a postoperative wound remains the most frequent complication of surgical intervention. If suppuration is located superficially, within the subcutaneous fat, it can be successfully managed with minimal functional losses. The clinical course is significantly complicated if the focus of infection is located under the skin, in the thickness of the muscles, in the fracture zone. In the case of suppuration in the area of osteosynthesis, the complication may become critical.Such a complication is a serious condition that requires multi-stage complex and sometimes multidisciplinary treatment.The conditions for a successful outcome in this pathology are the minimum period from the moment of suppuration, active surgical tactics, stability of the implant, and good vascularization of the surrounding soft tissues.Active surgical tactics involves the opening and sanitation of purulent foci, leaks, recesses. Staged necrectomies are inevitable companions of surgical treatment and can cause the formation of defects in the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and muscles.The resulting soft tissue defect leads to exposure of the bone and plate. Removal of the metal fixator becomes inevitable.Only the closure of the defect with a complex of tissues based on free vascularized composite grafts can radically solve the problem.The article presents two clinical observations of deep wound infection after bone osteosynthesis, where autotransplantation of a vascularized flap was used. The use of this technique made it possible to achieve suppression of infection, wound healing by primary intention, to create conditions for consolidation of the fracture, restoration of function and preservation of the limb as a whole.

An alarming increase in implant failure incidence due to microbial colonization on the administered orthopedic implants has become a horrifying threat to replacement surgeries and related health concerns. In essence, microbial adhesion and its subsequent biofilm formation, antibiotic resistance, and the host immune system's deficiency are the main culprits. An advanced class of biomaterials termed anti-infective hydrogel implant coatings are evolving to subdue these complications. On this account, this review provides an insight into the significance of anti-infective hydrogels for preventing orthopedic implant associated infections to improve the bone healing process. We briefly discuss the clinical course of implant failure, with a prime focus on orthopedic implants. We identify the different anti-infective coating strategies and hence several anti-infective agents which could be incorporated in the hydrogel matrix. The fundamental design criteria to be considered while fabricating anti-infective hydrogels for orthopedic implants will be discussed. We highlight the different hydrogel coatings based on the origin of the polymers involved in light of their antimicrobial efficacy. We summarize the relevant patents reported in the prevention of implant infections, including orthopedics. Finally, the challenges concerning the clinical translation of the aforesaid hydrogels are described, and considerable solutions for improved clinical practice and better future prospects are proposed.

Even till now, nothing much has been done to explore the inflammation and prevention of the same around the implants placed, hence the aim of this study was to evaluate factor associated with dentist knowledge, attitude along with practice in preventing peri-implant diseases. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, questionnaire based study carried within Dental professionals of Patna city. Stratified random sampling technique was the sampling method utilized in this study. The survey was conducted among 132 dentists. A questionnaire was framed by using google forms. Most of dental professionals were having fair knowledge {61(46.21%)}, positive attitude {61 (46.21%)} and poor practice (47.72%)} towards prevention of Peri-implant diseases. On application of Chi-square test, it was found that knowledge of study participants was significantly (0.05*) associated with gender, average duration of doing Implant surgery while attitude was significantly (0.05*) associated with age and degree. It was concluded that knowledge was fair; attitude was positive and despite this practice was poor regarding the prevention of Peri-Implant diseases among Dental professionals. Factors associated with knowledge, attitude and practice of study participants was gender, average duration of doing Implant surgery, age and degree.

This article outlines some promising future concepts against postoperative spinal implant infections on the basis of today available literature. The ever-adapting bacteria causing this common complication compel a corresponding continuous research about best effective treatment. The aim is to give a perspective on several future attack-points: surgical infection prevention strategies such as technical optimization of implants and surgical technique; faster diagnostic tools to detect infection, especially in the context of late infections with low-virulent germs and with regard to decision-making in the course of the surgical workflow; and combined surgical and medical treatment options against implant infections. The surgical treatment section will also state open issues concerning implant removal, and the medical treatment section will give an outlook to promising medical alternatives in a post-antibiotic era. To keep up in this field will be important to retain spine surgery in the future as the state-of-the-art treatment option for mandatory spinal interventions in the presence of tumor or trauma and even more so as an attractive option for patients with degenerative spinal disorder for improvement of their life quality.

Objective: Infectious complications occurring in cochlear implant (CI) recipients is of potentially major impact. A better understanding of severe infections in this cohort is necessary. Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study. Level of Evidence 2B. Setting: Single-center, retrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral hospital. Participants and interventions: We included all patients who received a CI at our institution between 1983 and end of 2018 (4,622 implantations). Main Outcomes: Prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and functional outcomes in severe implant infections. Results: There was an overall prevalence of 0.65% of severe CI infections. The cumulative incidence decreased after the year 2000, with lower infection rates with newer implant models. Patients with local risk factors were more susceptible to implant infection. In most patients, delayed re-implantation was successful. Speech-perception after re-implantation was comparable to pre-revision performance. Conclusions: Modified implant design and improved surgical technique has led to a decrease in the prevalence and incidence of infected implants. In severe implant infections, active surgical and antimicrobial management is required, to achieve good long-term results.

BACKGROUND Aesthetic and reconstructive implant-based breast surgeries are some of the most frequently performed procedures by plastic surgeons. As such, prevention of implant infection is of high importance. However, there remains no criterion-standard protocol for irrigation of the breast pocket. This review focuses on current irrigation practices in implant-based breast surgery. METHODS Four databases were used to search for all studies, including randomized controlled trials, retrospective cohort, and prospective cohort, containing original data related to the outcomes investigated in this study. Search terms included "breast," "irrigation," and "infection" in different combinations to isolate studies that focused on irrigation methods in both reconstructive and augmentation surgeries. Our selection criteria specifically concentrated on those studies that explicitly related irrigation procedures to rates of clinical infection and/or capsular contracture. Each was compiled into a table in chronological order to make comparisons between the differing irrigation methods. RESULTS Our search returned 239 full-text articles eligible for our review. Two independent screeners identified 9 studies that met the inclusion criteria. This included 1 prospective study and 8 retrospective studies. Two studies reported the use of chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation resulting in protection from clinical infection. Two studies investigated the role of triple antibiotic solution (TAS) either alone or combined with something else on risk of infection, and 3 reported TAS use on rates of capsular contracture. Two additional studies investigated the role of single antibiotic irrigation, concluding that some antibiotic regimen for irrigation may be sufficient in the breast pocket. Interestingly, one study noted the potential use of povidone-iodine (Betadine) as a method of irrigation. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that chlorhexidine gluconate, Betadine, and TAS irrigation of the breast pocket can provide protection against infection and implant loss in both reconstruction and augmentation surgeries.

Introduction Failure of hip implant surgeries can be caused by various factors. Failure of internal fixation results in pain and restricted ambulation. In management of an elderly patient with hip fractures, the aim is to ambulate patient. The purpose of our study is to assess the outcomes of proximal femur replacement in the management of failed hip surgeries for fractures of the proximal femur. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis of 26 patients, who underwent proximal femur replacement for failed surgeries of hip fracture during the period from April 2011 to March 2018, was conducted. All patients who underwent proximal femur replacement for failed hip implants were enrolled into the study. Results Total patients were 26. The mean follow was (12–91 months). The mean Harris Hip score improved from 26 preoperative to 66.7(45–91). Three patients developed dislocations which were managed with closed reduction. Three patients died within one year of surgery, one patent died of sepsis from implant infection at four months after surgery, one patient died of Myocardial infarction. Three patients developed surgical site infection of which one has superficial surgical site infection which was managed with oral antibiotics, in other case developed deep surgical site infection and was managed with wound debridement and IV antibiotics for 6 weeks, in third wound debridement was done but patient died of sepsis. Conclusion Proximal femur replacement with modular stem implant has advantages over conventional hip implant in patients undergoing surgery after failure of internal fixation., Highlights • Failure of hip implant surgeries can be caused by various factors. • In management of an elderly patient with hip fractures, the aim is to ambulate patient. • Proximal femur replacement with modular stem implant has advantages over conventional hip implant.

Introduction: Implant-associated infections are a major problem in orthopaedic surgery. Local delivery systems of antimicrobial agents on the implant surface have attracted great interest recently. The purpose of this study was to identify antimicrobial coatings currently used in clinical practice, examining their safety and effectiveness in reducing post-operative infection rates.Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted in four databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Cinahl) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines up to December 2019, using the key words “orthopaedic implant coated”, “coated implant infection”, “silver coating ” and “antibiotic coating”.Results: Seven articles involving 1307 patients (561 with coated implants and 746 controls who were not) comparing the incidence of periprosthetic infections after the application of internal fracture fixation, total arthroplasties and endoprostheses were evaluated. Three different coating technologies were identified: gentamicin coating for tibia nail and total arthroplasties; silver technology and povidone-iodine coating for tumour endoprostheses and titanium implants. Meta-analysis demonstrated that patients who were treated with antimicrobial coated implants presented lower infection rates compared to controls over the seven studies (Q = 6.1232, I2 = 0.00, 95% CI: 1.717 to 4.986, OR: 2.926, Z= 3.949, pConclusion: All technologies were reported to have good biocompatibility and were effective in the reduction of post-operative peri-prosthetic infection rates.

Aim: Evaluation of safety, cosmetic outcome and patients satisfaction following nipple sparing mastectomy with prepectoral direct to implant reconstruction using the TiLOOP® Bra Pocket. Background: TiLOOP® Bra Pocket is a new surgical tool consisting of a large-pore, non-absorbable synthetic mesh made from titanized monofilament polypropylene thread. It is used for immediate prepectoral implant reconstruction to fix the implant on the pectoralis major muscle and to avoid implant rotation. Material and methodes: Between October 2017 and February 2019, 57 patients underwent nipple sparing mastectomy in the certified breast cancer centre, at the AGAPLESION Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany. Data was collected in a prospective registry. All of the patients underwent a prepectoral direct to implant reconstruction using the new TiLOOP® Bra Pocket. We present the first analysis of this prospective unicentric registry. To measure and to analyse the cosmetic outcome and patients’ satisfaction, the BREAST-Q questionnaire was used, an established modular questionnaire to assess patient reported outcome (PRO). Results: All of the 57 patients were available for postoperative analysis. In 35/57 (61%) of the cases a seroma occured and was worth to be punctured. The median number of punctures was 4. The volume was 70 ml in average. Seven patients had a postoperative hematoma and had to undergo another surgical procedure. Three patients developed a skin necrosis or severe wound healing problem due to bad quality of the soft tissue and skin mantle and had to undergo implant explantation. One patient suffered from implant infection but could be treated conservatively. The analysis of patients’ reported outcome via the BREAST-Q resulted in a high satifaction rate regarding the cosmetic outcome. Conclusion: Direct to implant reconstruction with prepectoral implant position by using the TiLOOP® Bra Pocket is a very promising surgical approach. In comparison to a subpectoral implant reconstruction it reduces the duration of surgery, avoids a jumping breast phenomenon and causes less postoperative pain, moreover, it leeds to a high patient satisfaction rate and shows a moderate complication rate. Follow up of our patients will continue. The next analysis will be done after 24 months. Citation Format: Marc Thill, Viviane van Haasteren, Katharina Kelling. Prepectoral direct to implant reconstruction following nipple sparing mastectomy using the TiLOOP bra pocket [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-14-06.

An increasing number of cochlear implant (CI) users is examined by magnetic resonance imaging which may cause the displacement of the implant magnet. This complication prevents the usage of the external processor and has to be treated surgically in most cases. The purpose of this study is to analyze the results of the surgical intervention and the consequences for the CI recipients. The retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. From the patient care records between October 2014 and July 2018, 9 cases were reviewed that had undergone MRI after cochlear implantation and had experienced magnet displacement. Nine patients from 9 to 74 years of age were identified with MRI-induced magnet displacement. Implants of different manufacturers were affected (8 × Cochlear®, 1 Advanced Bionics®) but did not include the latest 3 T MR conditional product generation. The patients reported pain, swelling, redness above the implant and/or a noticeably dislocated magnet. One-third of the MRI examination were conducted in external radiological sites without any precautions such as a compression bandage. Surgical magnet repositioning was successful in all but one case with postoperative implant infection and consecutive explantation. In total, the patient was unable to use his CI for 420 days (1.2 years) after the MRI examination. The remaining eight patients averaged 29 days between MRI-related magnet dislocation and CI re-activation. The present study shows that in the majority of cases a surgical magnet reposition is possible without complications, and thus the time of nonuse of the CI is usually low. Nevertheless, there is a risk that in individual cases significant medical, functional, social and economic consequences for patients may occur. The presented data demonstrate that the indication to perform MRI scans in CI users needs to be further critically considered. An attentive, critical assessment of an MRI indication by both the initiating physician (usually not an ENT specialist) and the performing radiologist is mandatory.

This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Elsevier in Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering on 10/07/2021, available online: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815732-9.00131-5 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.

STUDY DESIGN A prospective single center observational study. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to examine the potential role of sonication in the diagnosis of low-grade infections and its association with pedicle screw (PS) loosening, and to describe risk factors and radiological findings associated with spinal implant infection. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Although PS loosening has mainly been attributed to mechanical overload, implant colonization and biofilm formation have recently been suggested. Culturing of sonication fluid implants is promising in the field of spine instrumentation infection, but little data are available. METHODS We prospectively included all patients who were subjected to implant removal. PS loosening was assessed with computed tomography (CT) scan. Different clinical and radiological parameters which could serve as indicators of implant infection were studied. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were included in the study and 11 of them (29%) had a positive sonication result. Patients with spinal implant infection were associated with screw loosening (P = 0.005). Particularly, those screws with a positive microbiological culture showed signs of screw loosening in the preoperative CT scan (P

Background Despite best practices, infection remains the most common complication after breast reconstruction with expanders and implants, ranging from 2% to 29%. Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics are frequently used in nonsurgical treatment of implant-associated infections in an effort to salvage the reconstruction. Pitfalls of antibiotherapy include adverse events, vascular access site complications, and drug resistance. Our goals were to describe management of implant infections with broad-spectrum antibiotics, review treatment related adverse events, and report on outcomes of therapy. Patients and methods A retrospective review was carried out to identify patients who were treated with intravenous (IV) antibiotics for periprosthetic infection. Patient characteristics, surgical details, and antibiotic therapy-related adverse events were collected. Eventual outcome related to expander/implant salvage was noted. Results A total of 101 patients (111 treatment episodes) were identified. Mean duration of antibiotic treatment was 18 days (range, 1-40 days). The most commonly used parenteral treatment was a combination of daptomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam (65%) or an alternative agent (16%). Fifty-nine percent of treatment episodes resulted in salvage of the expander or implant. Thirty-five percent treatment episodes were associated with 1 or more adverse events: diarrhea (12.6%), rash (10%), vaginal candidiasis (3.6%), agranulocytosis/neutropenic fever (3.6%), nausea (3.6%), urinary complaint (0.9%), myositis (0.9%), headache (0.9%), vascular line occlusion (1.8%), deep vein thrombosis (1.8%), and finger numbness (0.9%). No patients developed Clostridium difficile colitis. Five episodes (4%) needed discontinuation of antibiotics because of severe adverse events. The prosthesis was explanted in 3 of the cases of discontinued treatment. Conclusions Our findings show favorable outcomes and well-tolerated adverse effects with broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotherapy for periprosthetic infection. However, every effort should be made to deescalate therapy by narrowing the spectrum or limiting the duration, to minimize adverse events and development of bacterial resistance. Treating surgeons need to carefully weigh benefits of therapy and be aware of potential complications that might necessitate discontinuation of treatment.

Biofilm-related implant infections (BRII) are a disastrous complication of both elective and trauma orthopaedic surgery and occur when an implant becomes colonised by bacteria. The definitive treatment to eradicate the infections once a biofilm has established is surgical excision of the implant and thorough local debridement, but this carries a significant socioeconomic cost, the outcomes for the patient are often poor, and there is a significant risk of recurrence. Due to the large volumes of surgical procedures performed annually involving medical device implantation, both in orthopaedic surgery and healthcare in general, and with the incidence of implant-related infection being as high as 5%, interventions to prevent and treat BRII are a major focus of research. As such, innovation is progressing at a very fast pace; the aim of this study is to review the latest interventions for the prevention and treatment of BRII, with a particular focus on implant-related approaches.

BACKGROUND: Despite the dominance of implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy, during recent years, it has been correlated to some complications. The aim of this study is to present the Greek experience about management of implant infections after breast reconstructions and to investigate the relationship between possible risk factors and breast pocket fluid cultures. METHODS: In total, 260 patients underwent implant-based breast reconstruction due to breast cancer in our center from 2016 until 2020. 46 patients, that underwent implant or expander replacement after breast reconstruction due to mastectomy were included in the present study. RESULTS: 260 patients underwent breast reconstruction in our center and in 46 (18%) of them an implant replacement was required. 21 patients (8%) presented clinically with an implant infection, but 12 of them (5%) had positive cultures from the breast pocket fluid. On the contrary, 25 patients (10%) presented no clinical signs of implant infection, but 5 of them (2%) had a positive culture. In addition, we demonstrated a correlation between implant infection and positive cultures (p = 0.009), along with an association between chemotherapy before implant placements and negative cultures (p = 0.035). Finally, the most common pathogen was Staphylococcus epidermidis (29%), followed by Escherichia coli (24%) and Staphylococcus aureus (18%). CONCLUSION: Implant infection still remains a very serious complication after breast reconstruction surgery. The establishment of a therapeutic protocol, with specific antimicrobial and surgical targets seems as an effective strategy against implant infections.

Background The role of glycemic control in predicting implant infection and other surgical complications is debatable. This study aimed to assess the potential correlation between fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels prior to penile prosthesis surgery (PPS) and the surgical outcomes. Methods A retrospective study from data collected prospectively in 2015 in a single center. Patients who underwent penile implant procedures were included. Exclusion criteria were if surgery done by low-volume implanter, patients who required revision surgery or not diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. Management was standardized to all patients. Results All complications whether minor or major were documented up to three years. One year after the surgery a Likert scale questionnaire was completed by the patients. In total, 218 patients completed the study at last follow-up. Complications rate was 6.25%. The rate of infection requiring explantation was 3.8%. 0.9% of patients had a superficial infection managed successfully with conservative management. 0.9% had erosion and 0.9% had mechanical failure. There was no statistically significant difference in FBS or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in patients with postoperative complications compared to patients with satisfactory postoperative course. FBS level on the day of surgery was within 20 mg/dL (1.11 mmol/L) of the expected range based on HbA1c measurement in 62 patients (28.44%), while in 146 patients (66.98%) the FBS was not within 20 mg/dl (1.11 mmol/L) of the expected range based on preoperative HbA1c level. Conclusion FBS levels on the day of surgery are not correlated with HbA1c levels and PPS outcomes.

Background Staged implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common reconstructive modality following mastectomy. Postoperative implant infections can have a significant impact on adjuvant oncologic care and reconstructive outcome. Here, we investigate the impact of β-lactam antibiotics (i.e., bactericidal) compared to alternative antibiotic agents on postoperative outcomes for implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent immediate sub-pectoral tissue expander placement with an inferior acellular dermal matrix (ADM) sling at a single institution between May 2008 and July 2018 was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and complication rates were retrieved. The impact of antibiotic regimen on postoperative outcomes, including infection rate and reconstructive failure, was investigated. Results A total of 320 patients with a mean age and BMI of 48.2 years and 25.0 kg/m2 , respectively, who underwent 542 immediate breast reconstructions were included in the study. The use of a β-lactam antibiotic was protective against postoperative infection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.467, p = .046), infection requiring operative management (OR = 0.313, p = .022), and reconstructive failure (OR = 0.365, p = .028). Extended, that is, post-discharge, prophylaxis was not associated with any clinical benefit. Conclusion The use of β-lactam antibiotics for pre-/peri-operative prophylaxis is superior to alternative antibiotics with a bacteriostatic mechanism of action regarding rates of postoperative infection and reconstructive failure following immediate tissue expander-based breast reconstruction. Extended, that is, post-discharge, prophylaxis does not appear to be indicated, regardless of the antibiotic chosen.

Objectives This pilot study aimed to compare the commercial Unyvero ITI multiplex PCR application (U-ITI, Curetis GmbH) with conventional culturing concerning (a) detection of pathogens, (b) time to detection of pathogens and (c) time to and quality of antibiotic treatment recommendation in diagnostics of orthopedic implant-associated infections (OIAI). Results 72 tissue biopsies from 15 consecutive patients with deep OIAI infections were analyzed with conventional culturing including phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing and the U-ITI. U-ITI showed lower sensitivity than conventional culturing concerning detection of pathogens (73% vs 93%). 4/15 patients would have been given false negative results by U-ITI, all of which were culture-positive for Staphylococcus species. Median time to detection of pathogens was 47 h and antibiotic resistance 89 h by conventional methods compared to 13.5 h with the U-ITI. The U-ITI did not detect antibiotic resistance, whereas conventional culturing showed resistance to antibiotics covered by the U-ITI panel in 2 patients. Time to detection of pathogens was improved, but the detection limit for staphylococci was unsatisfactory. Although the time to antibiotic treatment recommendation was significantly reduced, the U-ITI would have resulted in incorrect antibiotic recommendation in 2 patients. Our data do not support use of this assay in diagnostics.

Review current literature for risk factors and strategies to prevent infection in urological prosthetic implants. Recent studies on risk factors and special patients are described. Strategies to decrease infection rate, role, and importance of biofilm is also discussed. Infection on implanted devices for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence is the most feared complication. Risk factors, where/when most infections occur, and the role of biofilm are discussed. Infection rates decreased with the advent of infection-resistant coated devices, and subsequently, bacteriological/isolate profiles changed. The bacteriology of implant infection is reviewed. Basic rules of perioperative implant prevention are ensuring no concurrent infections, proper alcohol-based skin preparation (not iodine), appropriate sterile technique, preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, reduced operative time, and limiting the implant from touching the skin. Future research is also discussed.

Background In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors examine the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) and specific antibiotic regimens for prevention of dental implant failure in patients who are healthy overall. Types of Studies Reviewed The authors independently conducted electronic database and manual searches to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The authors selected articles on the basis of eligibility criteria and assessed for risk of bias by using the Cochrane Handbook. Implant failure was the primary outcome studied; perimucositis or implantitis, prosthetic failure, and adverse events were secondary outcomes studied. The authors conducted random effects meta-analysis for risk ratios of dichotomous data and used OpenMeta[Analyst] (Center for Evidence Synthesis, Brown School of Public Health) for qualitative assessment of administration schedules. Results With duplicates removed, the authors screened 1,022 abstracts, reviewed 21 full-text articles, and included 8 RCTs that included 2,869 implants in 1,585 patients. Meta-analysis results indicated that AP resulted in a statistically significantly lower number of implant failures for all regimens combined (implant, P = .005; patient, P = .002), as well as preoperative (implant, P = .01; patient, P = .007), pre- and postoperative (implant, P = .04), and postoperative AP only (implant, P = .02), compared with no antibiotics. The authors found no statistically significant differences in analysis of comparative antibiotic treatments or secondary outcomes. The authors identified confounding variables. Conclusions and Practical Implications Although meta-analysis results suggested that AP may reduce implant failure, definitive conclusions cannot be achieved yet. The overall nonsignificant differences reported in individual trials, limitations discussed, implant infection outcomes, and antibiotic-associated risks must be considered. Thus, the results for implant failure outcomes may not warrant the indiscriminate use of antibiotics in patients who are healthy who are receiving dental implants. Investigators must conduct large-scale RCTs to determine the efficacy of AP and various regimens, independent of confounding variables.

Background: Placing a spinal stimulator for the purpose of restoring paralysed function is a novel procedure; however, paralysis predisposes people to infection. Preventing surgical site infections is critical to benefit this population. Objective: The objective of this study was to review the root cause analysis of postoperative wound infections by a hospital epidemiology team following implantation of epidural spinal cord neurostimulators in patients with chronic spinal cord injury. Methods: A team was assembled to review the case of every individual who had been enrolled to receive a neurostimulator at the facility. A root cause analysis was performed evaluating five categories: the patient; equipment; facility/environment; procedure; and personnel. Findings: The root cause analysis included 11 patients. Two patients became infected. Three others dehisced their wound without becoming infected. All patients were given preoperative antibiotics on time. A mean of 17 personnel were in the operating room during surgery. Vancomycin powder was used in the patients who either dehisced their wound or became infected. Conclusions: The root cause analysis provides guidance for other institutions performing the same novel procedure. This analysis did not reveal a direct association, but did generate several areas for improvement including increasing pre-surgical screening, cleaning transient equipment (e.g., computer screens), limiting traffic in the operating room, using new sterile instruments for each stage of the procedure, not reopening the back incision, not applying vancomycin powder, and using an antimicrobial envelope for the stimulator.

Prosthetic breast implantation is a common surgical procedure for augmentation and reconstruction after mastectomy. The incidence of implant infection is 1% to 2.5% and is higher for reconstruction following mastectomy compared with augmentation. Most infections are caused by gram-positive pathogens, such as coagulase-negative staphylococci, Cutibacterium species, Staphylococcus aureus, and streptococci. Acute infections are usually associated with fever and breast pain, erythema, and drainage. Subacute infections may present with chronic pain, persistent drainage, failed healing of the incision site, or migration of the implant. Depending on severity of infection, patients are started on empiric intravenous or oral antibiotics and closely monitored.

Introduction and importance Blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) resulting from blunt abdominal trauma is rare; therefore, there are no standard guidelines for its treatment. Herein, we report the successful treatment of BAAI via endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) performed immediately after emergency laparotomy to repair a bowel injury. Case presentation A 78-year-old man was injured after being caught between a shovel car and the bumper of his own car for approximately 15 s. Upon arrival at the hospital, the patient was conscious and had stable vital signs, abdominal and low back pain, and numbness in the right lower limb. Computed tomography revealed contrast medium leakage into the mesentery, as well as aortic dissection and rupture. Hemostasis and intestinal resection were completed, and EVAR was performed immediately after abdominal closure. The patient was discharged from the hospital at 35 days after surgery. Clinical discussion In this case, there existed a risk of artificial blood vessel infection if reconstruction was simultaneously performed with intestinal resection. Symptoms of lower limb ischemia that were observed prior to surgery resolved. After open surgery, bleeding was controlled, and the patient's vital signs were stable. EVAR was performed as treatment for aortic injury, thereby reducing the risk of direct implant infection and enabling minimally invasive treatment. Conclusion EVAR may be useful for the treatment of BAAI in the presence of intestinal injuries, reduce the risk of implant infection, and allow for a one-time, minimally invasive treatment., Highlights • Blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) resulting from blunt abdominal trauma is rare. • Endovascular aortic repair may be useful in the treatment of BAAI. • EVAR reduces the risk of implant infection.

BACKGROUND Type II distal phalanx (P3) fractures are a well-described cause of lameness in horses. Reports on outcome following internal fixation of type II P3 fractures are lacking, and with little emphasis on complications. OBJECTIVE To describe a technique for internal fixation of type II P3 fractures, and evaluate whether specific variables influenced post-operative complications or a horse's ability to return to work. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case series. METHODS Medical records of 51 horses with CT-guided internal fixation of type II P3 fractures were reviewed. Outcome data were acquired from race records and telephone interviews. Associations between independent variables and outcome were analysed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Eighty-six per cent (95% CI 74%-94%; n = 44) successfully returned to work. Implant infection (n = 15) and distal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis (n = 9) were the most common complications, with the latter reducing the likelihood of success (OR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.7, P = .02). Implant infection increased the time to return to work (HR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, P = .03). The odds of delayed infection decreased by filling the hoof defect with acrylic hoof adhesive rather than poly(methyl methacrylate) and deeply countersinking the screw head (OR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, P = .001); the individual effect of each treatment is unknown. Radiographic healing was not associated with likelihood of success. MAIN LIMITATIONS Study limitations included variation in follow-up methods, lack of control population for comparison and lack of randomisation of treatment protocols. CONCLUSIONS Internal fixation of type II P3 fractures is an effective treatment that allows horses to return to athletic use, with similar improved success rates as those reported for conservative management. Infection rates were reduced by deeply countersinking the screw head and filling the hoof defect with an acrylic that mimics hoof wall flexibility and provides a secure seal. Recommencement of training should be based on clinical rather than strictly radiographic findings.

Both, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and peri-spinal implant infection (PSII) are serious complications occurring in arthroplasty and spine instrumentation with absolute numbers expected to rise in the next years. The currently existing literature data describing the characteristics of PSII are limited when compared to PJI studies. However, both PJI and PSII exhibit similarities concerning pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. This literature review aims at comparing PJI and PSII and to develop implications for diagnosis and treatment of PSII from existing studies about PJI. The review was performed on the basis of a structured PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Medline analysis and existing guidelines, with 99 references being included. The results indicate that specific terms like re-infection should be defined in the context of PSII based on existing definitions of PJI, that in vitro biofilm studies and studies analyzing different prosthesis surfaces in arthroplasty could be used for PSII, and that histopathology as an additional standard tool in PSII diagnosis might be helpful. In addition, the development of a standardized algorithm-based treatment system with antibiotic protocols, including long term suppression, for PSII similar to the ones existing for PJI is necessary.

Post-operative implant infection is generally rare after breast augmentation, but it can occur in up to 35% of cases in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Standard treatment consists in the administration of antibiotics, implant removal, and delayed prosthesis replacement leading to multiple operations, with a negative impact on patient's clinical, economical, and psychological outcomes. There is little information published in the literature on the management of periprosthetic infection following pre-pectoral reconstructions. Capsule's removal from a pre-pectoral plane brings the risk of excessive tissue thinning and the compromise of skin flaps viability. In this preliminary multi-center case series, eight patients diagnosed with implant infection following oncological mastectomy and two-stage heterologous pre-pectoral breast reconstruction underwent the same protocol, consisting in tissue expander removal and conservative surgical revision supplemented by an antibiotate pulse lavage of the pocket surface. All patients achieved a successful infection resolution with immediate prosthesis replacement switching the temporary expander to definitive implant. No additional surgical revision was registered during follow-up. The intermittent irrigation is meant to disrupt the biofilm structure and restore antibiotic susceptibility. Moreover, pulse lavage allows the cleansing of the prosthetic capsule, thus avoiding the vascular stress associated with subcutaneous capsulectomy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first series reporting on the use of Pulsavac in periprosthetic infection following pre-pectoral breast reconstruction, in an attempt to set the basis for an alternative conservative protocol to manage breast implant infection. A thorough literature review on pulse lavage in breast surgery was carried out.

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli are the leading causes of bacterial intestinal infections worldwide, while Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus (C. fetus) has been reported to cause extraintestinal infections, including medical device implant infections. However, breast implant infections have rarely been reported. We describe the case of a 64-year-old woman with breast implant infection and vertebral osteomyelitis due to C. fetus. The patient recovered by surgical removal of the infected left implant and was treated with antibiotics for 6 weeks. However, two weeks after the completion of antibiotics, she experienced an infection in the right implant due to C. fetus, which had developed quinolone resistance with a G91T mutation during the treatment course. This case showed that C. fetus can cause breast implant infections, and although the infection may appear to be unilateral initially, the possibility of sequential contralateral infection should be considered.

The implantation of penile protheses for the surgical treatment of erectile dysfunction has risen in popularity over the past several decades. Considerable advances have been made in surgical protocol and device design, specifically targeting infection prevention. Despite these efforts, device infection remains a critical problem, which causes significant physical and emotional burden to the patient. The aim of this review is to broaden the discussion of best practices by not only examining practices in urology, but additionally delving into the field of orthopaedic surgery to identify techniques and approaches that may be applied to penile prothesis surgery.

Background: Animal models are used to guide management of periprosthetic implant infections. No adequate model exists for periprosthetic shoulder infections, and clinicians thus have no preclinical tools to assess potential therapeutics. We hypothesize that it is possible to establish a mouse model of shoulder implant infection (SII) that allows noninvasive, longitudinal tracking of biofilm and host response through in vivo optical imaging. The model may then be employed to validate a targeting probe (1D9-680) with clinical translation potential for diagnosing infection and image-guided debridement.Methods: A surgical implant was press-fit into the proximal humerus of c57BL/6J mice and inoculated with 2 mu L of 1 x 10(3) (e3), or 1 x 10(4) (e4), colony-forming units (CFUs) of bioluminescent Staphylococcus aureus Xen-36. The control group received 2 mu L sterile saline. Bacterial activity was monitored in vivo over 42 days, directly (bioluminescence) and indirectly (targeting probe). Weekly radiographs assessed implant loosening. CFU harvests, confocal microscopy, and histology were performed.Results: Both inoculated groups established chronic infections. CFUs on postoperative day (POD) 42 were increased in the infected groups compared with the sterile group (P Discussion: Given bone destruction in the e4 group, a longitudinal, noninvasive mouse model of SII and chronic osteolysis was produced using e3 of S aureus Xen-36, mimicking clinical presentations of chronic SII.Conclusion: The development of this model provides a foundation to study new therapeutics, interventions, and host modifications. (C) 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.

Spine implant infections portend poor outcomes as diagnosis is challenging and surgical eradication is at odds with mechanical spinal stability. The purpose of this method is to describe a novel mouse model of spinal implant infection (SII) that was created to provide an inexpensive, rapid, and accurate in vivo tool to test potential therapeutics and treatment strategies for spinal implant infections. In this method, we present a model of posterior-approach spinal surgery in which a stainless-steel k-wire is transfixed into the L4 spinous process of 12-week old C57BL/6J wild-type mice and inoculated with 1 × 10(3) CFU of a bioluminescent strain of Staphylococcus aureus Xen36 bacteria. Mice are then longitudinally imaged for bioluminescence in vivo on post-operative days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 18, 21, 25, 28, and 35. Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) signals from a standardized field of view are quantified to measure in vivo bacterial burden. To quantify bacteria adhering to implants and peri-implant tissue, mice are euthanized and the implant and surrounding soft tissue are harvested. Bacteria are detached from the implant by sonication, cultured overnight and then colony forming units (CFUs) are counted. The results acquired from this method include longitudinal bacterial counts as measured by in vivo S. aureus bioluminescence (mean maximum flux) and CFU counts following euthanasia. While prior animal models of instrumented spine infection have involved invasive, ex vivo tissue analysis, the mouse model of SII presented in this paper leverages noninvasive, real time in vivo optical imaging of bioluminescent bacteria to replace static tissue study. Applications of the model are broad and may include utilizing alternative bioluminescent bacterial strains, incorporating other types of genetically engineered mice to contemporaneously study host immune response, and evaluating current or investigating new diagnostic and therapeutic modalities such as antibiotics or implant coatings.

This preliminary study aims to investigate the effects of a maximal implant retention procedure. The authors retrospectively reviewed the use of negative pressure wound therapy with chymotrypsin irrigation treating implant infection/exposure in titanium mesh cranioplasty by comparing patients with titanium mesh totally retained, partially removed, or totally removed according to the evaluation during the surgery. Negative pressure wound therapy with chymotrypsin irrigation was applied 5 days after the surgery. The negative pressure was set at -125 to -150 mmHg. A total of 21 patients were included, 4 patients treated with titanium mesh totally removed; 3 patients treated with titanium mesh partially removed; and 14 patients treated with U-shape debridement with titanium mesh preserved completely. However, 1 patient in the U-shape group required a second debridement to remove all implant. Negative pressure wound therapy with chymotrypsin irrigation is a novel procedure and could be used to treat implant-related infection without the exchange of implant.

CAD-CAM patient-specific implants offer cerebral protection and improved facial balance without the disadvantages of autologous bone grafting such as donor site morbidity and unpredictable resorption. Several alloplastic materials are available, but titanium, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are the current popular choices. We reviewed our experience of applying different alloplastic CAD-CAM materials in the reconstruction of complex pediatric craniofacial deformities.A retrospective review was performed of all pediatric patients who underwent a complex inlay or onlay implant craniofacial reconstruction using CAD-CAM PEEK, PMMA, or titanium implants at a single institution. Demographics, cost, operative time, complications, and outcomes were assessed.Between 2003 and 2014, 136 patients (69 male; 67 female; mean age 11.5 years (3-22 years); mean follow-up 30 months) had custom patient-specific craniofacial reconstruction with PEEK (n = 72), PMMA (n = 42), and titanium (n = 22) implants (inlay = 93; onlay = 43). Indications included congenital anomalies (26.5%), decompressive craniectomies (25.0%), craniofacial syndromes (25.7%), tumor defects (14.0%), and post-trauma (6.6%). Implant cost varied significantly for PEEK ($7703 CAD) and PMMA ($8328 CAD) compared with that for titanium ($11,980 CAD) (p 0.0005). Six patients (4.4%) required surgery due to infection consisting of irrigation and antibiotic administration with successful implant salvage in three patients. All infections occurred in the PEEK group. Five patients (3.7%) ultimately had implants removed due to infection (n = 3), late exposure (titanium; n = 1), or late fracture (PMMA; n = 1).CAD-CAM alloplast reconstruction in the management of complex pediatric craniofacial deformities is effective although expensive. Implant infection does not always require explantation. A reconstruction algorithm is presented.

Introduction. Two-stage revision is the gold standard for the treatment of deep implant infection after knee or hip arthroplasty. Irrigation and debridement may be a treatment option for failed 2-stage revisions in cases where a reinfection occurs within 30 days or the symptoms exist not longer than 3 weeks and is appealing because of its low morbidity. We determined the incidence of recurrent infections following irrigation and debridement for failed two-stage revision hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods. We performed a single center retrospective review of periprosthetic hip and knee infections treated with a two-stage procedure from 2002 to 2010. All patients that subsequently underwent irrigation and debridement for a subsequent infection were selected for the current study. Results. 440 two-stage revisions were performed between 2002 and 2010. Fifty-one two-stage revisions failed (11.6%). Nineteen failed two-stage revisions were treated with irrigation and debridement; 12 (63.2%) patients remained free of infection at follow-up (mean follow-up: 39 months; range, 24-90 months), infection persisted in 6 patients (31.6%), and 1 patient died (5.3%). Conclusions. Success rates of irrigation and debridement for failed two-stage procedures are similar to the success rates of irrigation and debridement in primary implant infections. According to the current paper, irrigation and debridement are an acceptable treatment for acute reinfections after failed two-stage revision if performed within the first 30 postoperative days after failed two-stage procedure or if symptoms are present for less than 3 weeks in the presence of a susceptible organism.

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the outcome of conservative methods and 3D-assisted surgery for treatment of type III fractures of the distal phalanx with regard to recovery time and the development of osteoarthritis (OA) in the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ). The medical records of all horses with type III fracture of the distal phalanx referred to the Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, between 1992 and 2016 were reviewed. The severity of lameness at initial examination, radiographic evaluation, treatment (conservative, group A; 3D-assisted surgery, group B), complications, outcome and recovery time were determined. Follow-up examinations included clinical and radiographic examinations. Of 33 horses, 15 received conservative treatment and 18 underwent surgery. Eleven of the 15 (73.3%) horses in group A returned to their intended use and four were subjected to euthanasia or remained chronically lame. The median recovery time was 240 days (95% CI, 180–374). Thirteen of 15 (86.7%) horses developed OA of the DIPJ within 5 months of the fracture. In group B, 16 of 17 (94.1%) horses returned to their intended use, one horse remained chronically lame, and one horse was subjected to euthanasia because of unrelated reasons. The median recovery time was 139 days (95% CI, 120–270), and seven horses (38.9%) developed OA of the DIPJ within 5 months of the fracture. Overall, the screws had to be removed in five fluoroscopic-assisted surgery cases (three because of implant infection and two because of severe lameness), in one computer-assisted surgery case due to severe lameness and in one computed tomography-assisted surgery case because of implant infection. In conclusion, there was no significant difference in time for recovery of type III fractures of the distal phalanx between the two groups, but surgical treatment led to significantly fewer cases of OA in the DIPJ as determined by subjective radiographic evaluation (P = 0.015).

Implant-based breast reconstruction accounts for more than 70% of all breast reconstructions, and breast augmentation is the most commonly performed cosmetic operation annually. The clinically significant impact of infection and capsular contracture after breast implant surgery has brought clinicians to create infection reduction protocols for both oncologic and cosmetic operations alike. The use of triple-antibiotic saline irrigation has become a recommended intraoperative maneuver within these protocols to minimize surgical site infections, but the constituents of the irrigation, its individual efficacy, and the acceptability of including povidone-iodine within irrigation recipes have been debated. This review will investigate the microbiological data behind the selection of the constituents of triple-antibiotic saline. In vitro testing of the effectiveness of topical antibiotics used in saline irrigation against microorganisms responsible for breast implant infection is reviewed. Clinical data are presented describing the impact of triple-antibiotic saline on implant infection and capsular contracture after cosmetic and reconstructive surgery.

Background Breast reconstruction with tissue expanders is the most common mode of reconstruction following mastectomy. Infection necessitating tissue expander removal is a significant complication leading to patient distress and increased health care costs. Methods Over 3 years, 127 breast reconstructions with tissue expanders were performed by a single surgeon. Fifty-nine of these reconstructions were performed using a standardized protocol in which patients washed with chlorhexidine several days before surgery and received intravenous antibiotics preoperatively. Intraoperatively, the submuscular pocket was irrigated with triple-antibiotic solution and the skin was prepared again with povidone-iodine before expander placement. This group was referred to as the preintervention group. Sixty-eight of the reconstructions were performed using the standardized protocol with the addition of biodegradable antibiotic beads (Stimulan with vancomycin and gentamicin) in the submuscular pocket. This group made up the postintervention group. The primary outcome was the rate of infection necessitating tissue expander removal. Results The rate of tissue expander loss caused by infection was 11.9 percent in the preintervention group and 1.5 percent in the postintervention group (p = 0.024). Higher body mass index was associated with a statistically significant increase in infections necessitating expander removal. Conclusion The use of absorbable antibiotic beads in the submuscular pocket reduced the risk of periprosthetic implant infection necessitating implant removal by 8-fold. Clinical question/level of evidence Therapeutic, III.

Objectives To quantify and evaluate risks of complications attributable to external skeletal fixator (ESF) usage in dogs. Methods A retrospective review of medical records following ESF placement. Results Case records of 97 dogs were reviewed; fixator-associated complications occurred in 79/97 dogs. Region of ESF placement was significantly associated with complication development (p = 0.005), not complication type (p = 0.086). Complications developed most frequently in the tarsus (9/10), manus (8/9) and humerus (8/9). Superficial pin-tract infection and implant failure occurred in 38/97 and 17/97 dogs, respectively. Superficial pin-tract infection occurred frequently in the femur, humerus, radius and ulna and the pes, with implant failure frequent in the tarsus and deep pin-tract infection in the manus and tibia. Transarticular frames were significantly more likely to develop a complication (p = 0.028). Age was significantly associated with complication development (p = 0.029). No associations between breed, sex, weight, fracture type (open or closed), ESF classification and the incidence or type of complications were identified. No associations between, breed, age, sex, weight, fracture type (open or closed), ESF classification and the time to complication development were identified. Clinical Significance Fixator-associated complications are common in dogs, with the majority of complications related to implant infection. Region and placement of transarticular frames should be carefully considered when selecting stabilization method.

Implant related infection is relatively unusual in surgery to the hand and distal upper limb. When such infections occur, the consequences can be devastating. We review the latest guidance and research on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of implant-associated infections in the hand and distal upper limb.

Care provided to the Asian rhinoplasty patient may be multidisciplinary at times, including not only plastic surgeons, but also other health care professionals. It is crucial that all physicians caring for these patients practice complete awareness of the patient's prior operations and details of materials used in order to optimize results and avoid potentially devastating complications. These complications include but are not limited to implant infection and extrusion. Here the authors describe one such case report, discussing dermatologic biopsy of a silicone implant of the nasal tip and dorsum and subsequent revision rhinoplasty with implant removal and costochondral graft placement.

Study design A randomized complete block animal spinal implant infection model with internal control. Objective The aim of this study was to develop a spinal implant animal infection model to simulate postoperative gram-negative wound infection. Summary of background data Implant-associated surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a dreaded complication of spinal surgery. Currently, over 30% of all spine SSIs are secondary to gram-negative bacteria. Traditional animal models have utilized gram-positive inoculums to simulate postoperative infection, but there exists no model in the literature for gram-negative infection in the setting of spinal instrumentation. Methods Five New Zealand white female rabbits underwent simulated partial laminectomies and implantation of a 5 mm titanium wire adjacent to the spinous processes of vertebra T4, T9, L1, and L6 to mimic posterior spinal instrumentation. The second site, T9, was used as the sterile internal control sites, while all other sites were challenged with varying inoculums of Escherichia coli (EC American Type Culture Collection 25922): 10, 10, 10, 10, and 10 Colony Forming Units (CFU). The rabbits were sacrificed 4 days postoperatively and bacterial loads were assayed from the implants and surrounding tissue. Results No evidence for infection was observed in any of the sterile control sites. The lowest inoculum of E. coli (10 CFU) did not produce a reliable infection. Inoculation with 10 CFU created a consistent soft tissue infection, but inconsistent infection on implants. Inoculation with 10 CFU was required to consistently produce both soft tissue and implant infection. Conclusion Consistent soft tissue and implant infection was produced with inoculation of 10 CFU of E. coli. Gram-negative infections represent greater than 30% of all spinal SSIs, and this animal model can reliably reproduce such infections with spinal instrumentation that can guide future development of anti-infective therapies. Level of evidence 2.

Background Implant-based breast reconstruction is being performed more frequently, and implants are associated with an increased risk of infection. We reviewed the clinical features of cases of implant infection and investigated the risk factors for breast device salvage failure. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 771 patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction between January 2010 and December 2016. Age, body mass index, chemotherapy history, radiation exposure, and smoking history were assessed as potential risk factors for postoperative infection. We also evaluated the presence and onset of infection symptoms, wound culture pathogens, and other complications, including seroma, hematoma, and mastectomy skin necrosis. Additionally, we examined the mastectomy type, the use of acellular dermal matrix, the presence of an underlying disease such as hypertension or diabetes, and axillary node dissection. Results The total infection rate was 4.99% (58 of 1,163 cases) and the total salvage rate was 58.6% (34 of 58). The postoperative duration to closed suction drain removal was significantly different between the cellulitis and implant removal groups. Staphylococcus aureus infection was most frequently found, with methicillin resistance in 37.5% of the cases of explantation. Explantation after infection was performed more often in patients who had undergone 2-stage expander/implant reconstruction than in those who had undergone direct-to-implant reconstruction. Conclusions Preventing infection is essential in implant-based breast reconstruction. The high salvage rate argues against early implant removal. However, when infection is due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus and the patient’s clinical symptoms do not improve, surgeons should consider implant removal.

Summary Purpose When an implant becomes infected, implant salvage is often performed where the implant is removed, capsulectomy is performed, and a new implant is inserted. The patient is discharged with a PICC line and 6–8 weeks of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. This method has variable success and subjects the patient to long-term systemic antibiotics. In the 1960s, the use of antibiotic-impregnated beads for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis was described. These beads deliver antibiotic directly to the site of the infection, thereby eliminating the complications of systemic IV antibiotics. This study aimed to present a case series illustrating the use of STIMULAN calcium sulfate beads loaded with vancomycin and tobramycin to increase the rate of salvage of the infected implant and forgo IV antibiotics. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who were treated at Mount Sinai Hospital for implant infection with salvage and antibiotic beads. Results Twelve patients were identified, 10 of whom had breast cancer. Comorbidities included hypertension, smoking, and immunocompromised status. Infections were noted anywhere from 5 days to 8 years postoperatively. Salvage was successful in 9 out of the 12 infected implants using antibiotic bead therapy without home IV antibiotics. Conclusions The use of antibiotic beads is promising for salvaging infected breast implants without IV antibiotics. Seventy-five percent of the implants were successfully salvaged. Of the three patients who had unsalvageable implants, one was infected with antibiotic-resistant Rhodococcus that was refractory to bead therapy and one was noncompliant with postoperative instructions.

Introduction: Peri-implant infections can occur any time post-loading. Although management of peri-implant infections has been described extensively in the literature, no consensus exists on the best approach to its treatment. Infections and bone loss can also occur around implants prior to loading, leading to early implant loss. Little has been reported on management of peri-implant infections occurring prior to loading. This report describes the identification, surgical and restorative management of infection and bone loss around a pre-loaded dental implant.Case Presentation: A 52 year old systemically healthy, non-smoking white female had severe inflammation with bleeding on probing and bone loss around implant #28 seven weeks after placement and augmentation with autogenous and deproteinated bovine bone and a resorbable collagen membrane (RCM). Surgical exposure revealed a deep bony crater around the entire implant. The implant was cleaned for 4-5 minutes with a tetracycline and saline slurry. Guided ...

Summary Background Implant infections in the setting of breast reconstruction present a significant setback for patients with breast cancer. Traditional management of implant infections is predicated on the operative removal of the implant and delayed replacement. Another option for implant infection management has emerged in which the soft tissue infection is neutralized, the implant is removed, the surgical site is washed out, and a new implant replaced immediately. In this study, we present our findings with the implementation of this technique and an algorithm for choosing which patients are the most appropriate candidates on the basis of a retrospective review. Methods A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent operative removal of infected expanders from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015 was performed at the University of Michigan by the senior authors. The final reconstructive outcome, time to reconstruction, and infection recurrence were evaluated. Results Twenty patients with clinical signs of implant infections were identified. Of them, 16 patients with clinical signs of implant infection underwent immediate implant exchange; 15 remained infection free, while 1 patient developed recurrent infection within a month, which was treated with device removal. The mean time to final reconstruction in the 15 infection free patients was 207 days, and the 4 patients who underwent removal without immediate replacement had a 75% rate of non-completion at over 500 days. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that immediate implant exchange safely offers patients the opportunity to remain on a path toward reconstruction. These findings offer support for a paradigm shift in our management of implant infections in breast reconstruction patients who already face challenges associated with breast cancer care.

To investigate the predictive value of preoperative serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on the development of postoperative infections in patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation (PPI). We retrospectively analyzed the data of 361 patients who underwent PPI over a 4-year period with at least 1-year follow-up. Demographics, blood results, and postoperative 1-year complications were recorded. Recommended cutoff values of NLR for early postoperative infectious complications were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. A total of 153 patients with the mean age of 56.4 ± 8 years were included in the study. Mean follow-up time was 56.7 ± 30.4 months (12–108 months). Early postoperative infectious complications were occured in 18 patients (11.8%). These infections were prosthesis infection in 8 patients (5.2%), wound infection in 6 patients (3.9%), and urinary tract infection in 4 patients (2.6%). All these complications were occured within the first year of the surgery. Mean NLR was statistically higher in patients with postoperative complications when compared with uncomplicated cases (7.2 ± 3.9 vs. 2.2 ± 1.4, p

Introduction: Proximal femoral fractures account for about 10 to 34% of all hip fractures with bimodal age distribution and different mechanisms of injury. Older patients sustain low velocity trauma while in younger patients these fractures are from high energy trauma. Early surgical intervention is recommended for most of these patients to reduce the complications associated with prolonged immobilization. The locking compression plate is used for angular-stable plating for the treatment of complex comminuted and osteoporotic fractures. This type of internal stabilization may be the choice for subtrochanteric or transverse intertrochanteric fractures. Objective: The study aimed to report the outcome of management of unstable proximal femoral fractures which was managed using proximal femoral locked compression plate in our setting.Method: A retrospective study of all conservative patients managed at two centres in Nigeria. The Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Plateau State and the Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital, Kaduna State University Teaching Hospital Kaduna. A structured Proforma was used to retrieve information from the hospital records and operation notes of patients that where fixed with PF-LCP. Results: A total of 25 fractures in 25 patients where studied, 17 males and 8 females with a male female ratio of 2:1. The patient age ranged between 20 to 88 years. Road traffic accident was the commonest etiologic agent account for 73.9% of the cases and the remaining 26.1% was due to domestic falls at home. 43.8% of the patients presented 12 weeks after the injury, 25.0% of them between 4 to 12 weeks of injury and 31.2% presented within 4 weeks of the injury. The fractures were intertrochanteric in 16.0% of the patients and sub trochanteric in 84.0%. The average duration of union as evidenced by bridging callus in at least 3 cortices radiologically was 15.4weeks. 23 of the patients went on to unite without any complication one had implant failure (screw breakage) due to premature full bearing for which additional surgeries where done while another had an implant infection. Conclusion: Proximal locked compression plating for proximal femoral fractures is a useful alternative based on its anatomic design for proximal femoral fractures in which could be due to osteoporosis especially in elderly patients.

The most common reasons for revision surgery of penile prostheses include mechanical failure, infection and patient dissatisfaction. While revisions for mechanical failure and patient dissatisfaction are relatively routine surgical procedures, penile prosthesis implantation in previously failed settings is daunting, even for the experienced implanter. The surgical planes are altered and obliterated by scar. To maximize success, specialized instruments, downsized implants and lots of experience are necessities. Even experienced implanters without these assets have a high complication rate. Even if a surgical victory is achieved for the surgeon, the patient may be unhappy about his loss of length. This chapter is meant as a guide to the focused implanter for navigating the tricky pathways of redo of multi component prosthetics. We hope to help the reader prevent mistakes and reward realistic patient expectations in this difficult surgery on discouraged patients.

Summary Background Breast implants are widely used in reconstruction after breast cancer. Infection after implant reconstruction is a major complication, with rates ranging from 5 to 30%. This rate is less for pure cosmetic augmentation. Historically, infection of an implant mandated implant removal for sepsis control. An alternative is to attempt to salvage the infected implant. This path can be a long one, requiring surgery for washouts and prolonged antibiotic therapy. This article documents our experience of infected implant salvage over the last 13 years. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who developed a breast implant infection between January 2005 and January 2018. All patients had both clinical signs of infection and a positive bacteriological sample. Patients were divided into two groups: upfront medical therapy (including those requiring secondary surgical salvage) and primary surgery. The salvage procedure was defined as successful when the implant was still in place three months after the initial reconstruction. Results Eighty patients were included: 77 in the medical group and 3 in the surgical group. Overall, implant salvage was achieved in 88.8% of women (n=71). Of these, 73.8% (n=59) underwent medical treatment alone and 15% (n=12) underwent medical treatment followed by surgical management. The main causative organism was staphylococcus in 81.2%. When the infection was caused by a coagulase-negative staphylococcus, the rate of success was 98% (p Conclusions This case series reports that salvage of an infected breast implant was achievable in up to 90% of women presenting with a documented infection, the majority requiring antibiotic management only. Early intervention is central to success.