Search

Surveillance guidelines for the management of familial colorectal cancer (FCC), a dominant family history of colorectal cancer in which the polyposis syndromes and Lynch syndrome have been excluded, are not firmly established. The outcome of colonoscopic surveillance is studied using data from six centers. DNA mismatch repair deficiency was excluded by genetic testing. Families were classified as FCC type X if they fulfilled the original Amsterdam criteria (AC) and late onset (LOFCC) if they fulfilled the AC apart from not having a cancer aged under 50. The most advanced findings on colonoscopy were analyzed. One thousand five hundred eighty-five individuals (median age 47.3, 44% male) from 530 FCC families (349 FCC type X) underwent a total of 4,992 colonoscopies with 7,904 patient-years of follow-up. Results for FCC type X and LOFCC were very similar. At baseline, 22 prevalent asymptomatic colorectal cancers were diagnosed, 120 (7.6%) individuals had high-risk adenomas and 225 (14.2%) simple adenomas. One thousand eighty-eight individuals had a further colonoscopy (median follow-up of 6.2 years). Of nine individuals diagnosed with cancer, eight had a previous history of at least one polyp/adenoma. High-risk adenomas were detected in 92 (8.7%) and multiple adenomas were detected in 20 (1.9%) individuals. Both FCC type X and LOFCC have a high prevalence of colorectal cancers and on follow-up develop high-risk adenomas (including multiple adenomas), but infrequent interval cancers. They should be managed similarly with five-yearly colonoscopies undertaken from between 30 and 40 with more intensive surveillance in individuals developing multiple or high-risk adenomas.

Item does not contain fulltext Familial colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for 10-15% of all CRCs. In about 5% of all cases, CRC is associated with a highly penetrant dominant inherited syndrome. The most common inherited form of non-polyposis CRC is the Lynch syndrome which is responsible for about 2-4% of all cases. Surveillance of individuals at high risk for CRC prevents the development of advanced CRC. About 1 million individuals in Western Europe are at risk for Lynch syndrome. We performed a survey to evaluate the strategies currently used to identify individuals at high risk for CRC in 14 Western European countries. Questionnaires were distributed amongst members of a European collaborative group of experts that aims to improve the prognosis of families with hereditary CRC. The survey showed that in all countries obtaining a family history followed by referral to clinical genetics centres of suspected cases was the main strategy to identify familial and hereditary CRC. In five out of seven countries with a (regional or national) CRC population screening program, attention was paid in the program to the detection of familial CRC. In only one country were special campaigns organized to increase the awareness of familial CRC among the general population. In almost all countries, the family history is assessed when a patient visits a general practitioner or hospital. However, the quality of family history taking was felt to be rather poor. Microsatellite instability testing (MSI) or immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) of CRC are usually recommended as tools to select high-risk patients for genetic testing and are performed in most countries in patients suspected of Lynch syndrome. In one country, IHC was recommended in all new cases of CRC. In most countries there are no specific programs on cancer genetics in the teaching curriculum for medical doctors. In conclusion, the outcome of this survey and the discussions within an European expert group may be used to improve the strategies to identify individuals at high risk of CRC. More attention should be given to increasing the awareness of the general population of hereditary CRC. Immunohistochemical analysis or MSI-analysis of all CRCs may be an effective tool for identifying all Lynch syndrome families. The cost-effectiveness of this approach should be further evaluated. All countries with a CRC population screening program should obtain a full family history as part of patient assessment. 01 juni 2010

BACKGROUND Endometrial carcinoma is the most common extracolonic malignancy associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma syndrome (HNPCC). The risk of endometrial carcinoma in HNPCC mutation carriers is approximately ten times that of the general population, and endometrial ultrasound surveillance to detect early cancer in asymptomatic individuals is recommended by the International Collaborative Group on HNPCC. There is little, if any, published data addressing the effectiveness of surveillance in HNPCC and familial colorectal carcinoma. METHODS The outcomes of endometrial carcinoma surveillance scans were collected from the St Mark's Hospital Imperial Cancer Research Fund Family Cancer Clinic in the UK and the Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors. Two hundred ninety two women from HNPCC (171) or HNPCC-like (98) families between the ages of 25-65 years were offered pelvic ultrasound surveillance scans for a period of up to 13 years. RESULTS Results were available from 269 women. The study period included a total of 825.7 years of risk. Two cases of endometrial carcinoma were reported. Neither case was detected by surveillance scanning. Both cases presented at an early stage with symptoms and were subsequently cured. CONCLUSIONS Endometrial carcinoma surveillance in hereditary colorectal carcinoma may not offer obvious clinical benefits. Cancer 2002;94:1708–12. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10380

Background & Aims: Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant predisposition to colorectal cancer caused by mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes; colorectal cancer risk is high. Few studies have addressed colorectal cancer risk in individuals from dominant families without mismatch repair deficiency. We sought to establish whether these individuals are also at increased risk by examining the incidence of advanced neoplasia during surveillance. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, BAT26 testing of tumors was carried out at 2 tertiary centers on 125 individuals from 97 families (with a dominant colorectal cancer history) to classify families as Lynch syndrome (microsatellite unstable) or non-Lynch syndrome (microsatellite stable). Colonoscopy results in 288 at-risk family members were compared. Results: Twenty-nine families were classified as Lynch syndrome and 68 as non-Lynch syndrome. Seven hundred seventy-six colonoscopies were undertaken. High-risk adenomas occurred in 7 of 91 (7.7%) Lynch syndrome individuals and 15 of 197 (7.6%) non-Lynch syndrome individuals, adjusted relative risk 1.15 (95% CI: 0.6 –2.3). Cancer was observed only in Lynch syndrome individuals (4/91; 4.4%), Fisher exact test, P .010. Multiple adenomas were only seen in non-Lynch syndrome individuals (13/197; 6.6%), Fisher exact text, P .06. Conclusions: Individuals with an autosomal dominant family history of colorectal cancer with and without evidence of Lynch syndrome are at equal risk of high-risk adenomas during surveillance, but colorectal cancer was only seen in Lynch syndrome. Therefore non-Lynch syndrome individuals do require colonoscopic surveillance, but the interval could be lengthened because risk of (interval) cancer is low. Lynch syndrome individuals require short surveillance intervals as is the recommended practice.

Background: Increasing evidence suggests that inherited susceptihility is an important factor in the pathogenesis of colorectal adenomas and colorectal cancer; because of that, screening strategies that consider familial risk could increase their effectiveness. Aims : The aim of this study was to know the risk for colorectal adenomas, colorectal cancer and extracolonic cancers in first degree relatives of patients with colorectal adenomas. Methods and Patients : We evaluated patients referred to our institution for initial colonoscopy between June 1996 and July 1997 who did not have a family or personal history of familial polyposis, inflammatory bowel disease neither previous polypectomies or colorectal cancer (n= 379). Patients were divided in two groups: Group A) patients with complete colonoscopy with removal of one or more adenomas (n= 164) and. Group B) patients with complete colonoscopy without adenomas (n= 215). Mean age in group A and B was 62 and 61 respectively (p= NS).As well, no significant differences in sex between group A (MIF 40%/60%) and group B (MIF 52%/48%). They all were interviewed in order to determine if history of colorectal adenomas, colorectal cancer or extracolonic cancers had been documented in their first degree relatives . Result s:A mong first degree relatives of patients with adenomas (n= 1132). 12 ( J.I %) had personal history of colorectal adenomas. 19 (1.7%) of colorect al cancer and 16 ( 1.4%) antecedents of extracolonic cancer. In the group of first degree relatives of those without adenomas (n= 1478). 3 ( 0.2%) had personal history of colorectal adenomas, 16 ( J.I %) of colorec tal cancer and 17 ( 1.1 %) antecedents of extracolon ic cancer. Odds Ratio for colorectal adenomas, colorectal cancer and extracolonic cancers in the relatives of the patients with adenomas as compared with controls was 5 27 ( 95% CI: 1.38-23.53; p=0.009*), 1.72 (95 % CI: 0.79-3.76; p=0.19) and 1.23 (95% CI: 0.59-2.57; p= 0.67) respectively. Conclusions:First degree relatives of patients with newly diagnosed adenomas are at increased risk for developing colorectal adenomas. It supports a familial predisposition for these premalignant lesions and suggests that total colonoscopy screening could be indicated in these subjects.

Sebaceous carcinomas are rare cutaneous appendageal tumors that may occur sporadically or in association with an internal malignancy in Muir-Torre syndrome. In Muir-Torre syndrome microsatellite instability can often be demonstrated in tumor DNA as a result of an inherited mutation in one of several known mismatch repair genes; however, the role of microsatellite instability in sporadic sebaceous carcinomas has not been previously studied. In this report we describe the clinicopathologic characteristics of a series of unselected sebaceous carcinomas and examine them for the presence of microsatellite instability. Of 10 consecutive tumors identified over a 10 y period, only one was from a patient known to have Muir-Torre syndrome. Of the nine presumed sporadic cases, five were from four renal transplant recipients and four from otherwise healthy individuals. Microsatellite instability was demonstrable in three cases: in the Muir-Torre syndrome-associated tumor and in two tumors from transplant patients. Microsatellite instability was subsequently also found in a sebaceous carcinoma from a further transplant patient prospectively sought from another institution. The presence of microsatellite instability in post-transplant sebaceous carcinomas was associated with loss of expression of the mismatch repair protein hMSH2. In summary, sebaceous gland carcinomas, while characteristic of Muir-Torre syndrome, are commonly found outside this context. Among presumed sporadic cases, our data suggest they may be over-represented in immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients. The presence of microsatellite instability in transplant-associated lesions, together with loss of hMSH2 expression suggests that immunosuppression might unmask a previously silent Muir-Torre syndrome phenotype in some cases. Alternatively, there is experimental evidence to suggest that immunosuppressive drugs, most plausibly azathioprine, could select for the emergence of a mutator phenotype and thus predispose to the development of sebaceous carcinomas. The role of mismatch repair defects in other post-transplant skin malignancies remains to be established.