Search

Background/methods: Although the prognosis of metastatic breast cancer (BC) has improved, some patients still develop high burden metastases or visceral crisis (VC) and polychemotherapy is commonly used in these cases. Data reporting the real effectiveness of this strategy are scanty. Therefore, the outcomes of patients with metastatic BC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (P-ChT) at the Jules Bordet Institute during the period of January 2008 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of VC was defined according to ABC 4 criteria. Results 441 patients were identified: visceral metastases were observed in 430 (97.5%) while 261 (59.2%) presented VC. As for metastatic BC subtype, 255 (57.8%) had ER-positive/HER2-negative, 41 (9.3%) ER-positive/HER2-positive, 34 (7.7%) ER-negative/HER2-positive and 111 (25.1%) triple-negative BC. Median number of prior treatment lines was 3.8 (0–12). Median OS with P-ChT in the entire cohort was 6.13 months. Patients with VC had lower OS than patients without VC (8.6 vs 3.7 months; p 3 previous treatment lines (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.53–3.21). Of the 261 patients with VC, 106 (40.5%) presented a resolution of the VC which correlated with better OS (9.3 vs 2.0 months, HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.21–0.36). Conclusion Patients who overcome VC benefit from P-ChT with OS similar to patients without VC. In this analysis, hyperbilirubinemia, poor ECOG and >3 previous treatment lines were significant prognostic factors in the overall study population., Highlights • Outcomes of pts with advanced BC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy at our Institution were reviewed. • Our results highlight the poor prognosis of pts with BC and visceral crisis (VC). • Hyperbilirubinemia, poor ECOG PS, and >3 prior treatment lines may be factors associated with inferior OS. • Prospective studies in pts with VC are needed to provide better guidance towards treatment decisions.

Background: Pregnancy-related issues are a priority for young breast cancer (BC) patients. Increasing evidence has shown that pregnancy after prior BC diagnosis is feasible. Nevertheless, few BC survivors conceive following anticancer treatment completion and many physicians remain concerned about the potentially detrimental effects of pregnancy after BC in terms of fetal/obstetrical outcomes and maternal prognosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at providing updated and solid evidence on these important issues. Methods: A systematic literature review up to January 31, 2020 with no language restriction was conducted to identify studies including patients with a pregnancy after prior BC diagnosis. Chances of pregnancy after BC, fetal and obstetrical outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Pooled relative risks (RRs), hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random effects models. The study is registered with the PROSPERO registration number CRD42020158324. Results: Overall, 39 studies were included. Out of the 8,265,713 young women included in these studies, 8,093,401 were from the general population, 57,739 had cancers other than BC, 114,573 had BC. Among the 114,573 BC patients, 7,505 had a pregnancy after BC diagnosis and 107,068 did not. Compared to women from the general population, BC patients had 60% reduced chances of having a pregnancy following anticancer treatment completion (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.32-0.49). Among other cancer patients, only women with prior cervical cancer had lower pregnancy rates (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.31-0.35) than BC patients. Compared to the general population, BC survivors had significantly increased risks of low birth weight (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.31-1.73), small for gestational age (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.33), preterm delivery (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11-1.88) and caesarean section (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.25). No significant increased risk of congenital abnormalities (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.89-2.98) or other pregnancy or delivery complications (spontaneous or induced abortion, gestosis, antepartum or postpartum hemorrhage) was observed. Prior chemotherapy exposure or short pregnancy interval (defined as Pregnancy after BC was not associated with a negative impact on patients’ outcomes. Compared to BC patients without subsequent pregnancy, those with pregnancy after BC had better OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46-0.67) and DFS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.94). Similar results were observed in the studies correcting for the potential “healthy mother effect” (OS: HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.42-0.65; DFS: HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.96). No detrimental prognostic effect of pregnancy after BC was observed in patients with hormone-receptor positive disease (DFS: HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.73-1.66), while better outcomes were observed for those with hormone-receptor negative disease (DFS: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95). The safety of pregnancy after BC was observed irrespective of BRCA status, nodal status, previous chemotherapy exposure, pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes. Conclusions: This large meta-analysis provides solid evidence on the safety of pregnancy after prior BC diagnosis. The increased risk of fetal and obstetrical complications (but not of congenital abnormalities) calls for ensuring a closer monitoring of these pregnancies. The significantly reduced chances of conceiving as compared to the general population and other cancer patients should raise further awareness on the need to improve the oncofertility counseling of young BC patients wishing to complete their family planning following anticancer treatment completion. Citation Format: Eva Blondeaux, Marta Perachino, Marco Bruzzone, Richard A. Anderson, Evandro De Azambuja, Philip D. Poorvu, Hee Jeong Kim, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Barbara Pistilli, Ines Vaz-Luis, Cristina Saura, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Maria Alice Franzoi, Chiara Sertoli, Marcello Ceppi, Hatem A. Azim, Jr., Frederic Amant, Isabelle Demeestere, Lucia Del Mastro, Ann H. Partridge, Olivia Pagani, Fedro A. Peccatori, Matteo Lambertini. Chances of pregnancy after breast cancer, reproductive and disease outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-09.

Body composition parameters including muscle and adipose tissue measurements have emerged as prognostic factors in cancer patients. Besides cell cycle regulation, CDK 4 and 6 also control metabolic processes (lipid synthesis, glycolysis, and mitochondrial function). We studied the impact of baseline body composition parameters on response to CDK 4/6 inhibition and changes on body composition during treatment. Retrospective study of 50 patients treated at Institut Jules Bordet between December 2016 and August 2019 with endocrine therapy and CDK 4/6 inhibitor as first or second-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (BC). CT-based body composition analysis was performed at 3 time points. Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier method were used for the association with Progression-free survival (PFS). Changes in body composition parameters were described in means and compared using paired sampled T test. Baseline sarcopenia was present in 40% of patients and associated with a significantly worse PFS compared to patients without sarcopenia (20.8 vs 9.6 months, HR 2.52; 95% CI 1.02–6.19, p = 0.037). Patients with higher visceral fat index and higher visceral fat density had better PFS (20.8 vs 10.4 months, HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.16–0.99 p = 0.041-stratified for treatment line). No significant alterations in body composition parameters during treatment were observed. Sarcopenia is a potential early marker of poor prognosis among patients with metastatic BC treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors. CT scan evaluation of sarcopenia and adiposity revealed significant prognostic information. Visceral fat could also play an important role in response to CDK 4/6 inhibitors, deserving further investigation.

Background: The number of people living with HIV is increasing worldwide thanks to the use of effective antiretroviral therapy. As these individuals get older, their risk of being diagnosed with cancer increases, including non-AIDS defining cancers such as breast cancer (BC). Most reports reveal that HIV+ patients (pts) with BC tend to be younger than HIV-uninfected (HIV-) pts. However, epidemiological data is yet conflicting regarding tumor stage at diagnosis, distribution of BC subtypes and overall survival (OS) of HIV+ pts as compared to HIV- pts. This meta-analysis aims to assess differences of baseline clinicopathological characteristics and OS of HIV+ vs HIV- BC pts. Methods: We performed a systematic review using MEDLINE, Scielo, and conference abstracts up to June 10, 2019, with no language restrictions. Cohort studies and consecutive series comparing baseline characteristics (age, stage at diagnosis or BC subtypes) and/or OS of HIV+ vs HIV- BC pts were included. BC subtypes were defined according to 2 classifications: 1) “classic” immunohistochemical (IHC) subtypes (ER+/HER2-; HER2+; triple-negative BC); 2) surrogate intrinsic subtypes as per the St. Gallen Consensus (luminal A-like, luminal B-like, HER2-enriched and basal-like). Summary risk estimates (pooled mean ratios [pMR] and odds ratios [pOR]) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random effects models. OS data were pooled as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI and modeled using a random effects model. The main endpoints were age (as a continuous variable), stage at diagnosis (early [0-II] vs late [III-IV]), distribution of BC subtypes and OS (using both adjusted and unadjusted HR). Subgroup analysis of each endpoint was performed according to region of the world. Results: A total of 16 studies (4 from North America and 12 from Sub-Saharan Africa [SSA]) published from 2005-2019 were included in this meta-analysis (with 1,764 HIV+ and 1,330,122 HIV- pts). HIV+ pts were younger than HIV- pts (pooled mean age of 41.1 vs 50.5 years, respectively; pMR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.90, p < 0.001) and had a 45% increased risk of presenting with late stage disease (pOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.25-1.68, p < 0.001). There were no differences regarding distribution of BC subtypes, both by the “classic” IHC or by the St. Gallen classification. Overall, HIV+ pts had a 91% increased risk of dying as compared to HIV- pts (adjusted HR for OS: 1.91, 95% CI 1.06-3.45, p = 0.031 and unadjusted HR for OS: HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.10-1.95, p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis of OS according to region of the world showed that, in North America, HIV+ pts had a significantly increased risk of dying as compared to HIV- pts (adjusted HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.06-8.25, p = 0.038). In SSA, the increased mortality risk among HIV+ pts was also significant (adjusted HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.26-2.00, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis showed similar findings. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides for the first time a comprehensive comparison of baseline characteristics and survival outcomes between HIV+ vs HIV- BC pts. Our results consistently demonstrate that HIV+ pts are diagnosed with BC at a younger age and at a more advanced stage. Additionally, even after adjusting for known prognostic factors, HIV+ pts have a worse OS as compared to HIV- pts, not only in developing countries (SSA) but also and particularly in developed countries (North America). There were no apparent differences in terms of distribution of BC subtypes. These results should raise the awareness of clinicians and policy makers regarding the detection and survival gap among HIV+ BC pts. This underserved population should be the focus of more research efforts, in order to better understand the reasons behind these disparities, which can be related to the HIV infection itself, to a more aggressive BC biology, and/or to a lower access to timely diagnosis and effective treatment. Citation Format: Mariana Brandão, Marco Bruzzone, Maria Alice Franzoi, Claudia De Angelis, Daniel Eiger, Rafael Caparica, Martine Piccart-Gebhart, Laurence Buisseret, Marcello Ceppi, Evandro de Azambuja, Matteo Lambertini. Characteristics and survival outcomes of HIV-positive breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-03.

Despite improvements in the management of HER2+ breast cancer, metastatic disease is still fatal. Usually, these patients receive several lines of chemotherapy associated with HER2 targeted treatments. Most of the trials using innovative approaches are positioning themselves in disease that is resistant to pertuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine (TDM1).We describe the recent advances in clinical development of anti-HER2 treatments. To this aim, we used literature search via Pubmed and made an inventory of abstracts published during the last two years in major oncology conferences.Further changes will probably occur during the next decade in the management of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. This is mainly driven by the fact that the two mainstay drugs (pertuzumab and TDM-1) that confer prolonged survival (56 months) to these patients are currently being used in the treatment of early-stage disease in a subset of patients. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop new, innovative approaches in those patients whose disease has become resistant to these highly potent drugs. Several new antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies or new generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) hold promise and should be assessed and compared with drugs currently used.

Describe the clinical and epidemiological data from young women with breast cancer and determine the association between ethnicity, insurance status, family income, and breast cancer stage at the diagnosis in this population. Women under the age of 40 diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2010 to 2014 and identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries database were included. Binary logistic regression was applied in order to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for factors that were potentially predictive for receiving a breast cancer diagnosis at stage I. Of 14,379 young women with invasive breast cancer, 70.9% of the patients were white, 15.9% black, and 13.2% classified as other ethnicity (American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander). The initial clinical stage at diagnosis was stage I in 28.2%, II in 45.2%, III in 19.0%, and IV in 7.6%. The chi-square test showed a significant association between clinical stage at diagnosis and family income (p

Introdução: A hipodermóclise é uma via de infusão em pacientes com câncer nos casos em que os acessos oral e endovenoso não estão disponíveis. Considerando a sua utilidade no controle dos sintomas no final de vida, faz-se importante ampliar o conhecimento e a divulgação das experiências quanto aos seus benefícios. Relato de caso: Trata-se de dois relatos de caso de pacientes com câncer, nos quais a hipodermóclise foi utilizada para administração de medicamentos. Conclusão: Essa prática apresentou-se como uma via segura, minimamente invasiva e eficaz no tratamento sintomático dos pacientes com câncer em cuidados paliativos.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is defined as infiltration of the leptomeninges by metastatic carcinoma, a relatively uncommon but devastating complication of many malignancies. Although only 5% of patients with breast cancer develop leptomeningeal involvement, it remains the most common etiology of LC. It can occur as a late-stage complication of systemic progression or present as the first sign of metastatic disease, with or without parenchymal brain metastases. Lobular carcinomas have a higher propensity to metastasize into the meninges when compared to ductal carcinoma, especially the triple-negative subtype, which usually is associated with a shorter interval between metastatic breast cancer diagnosis and the development of LC. Prognosis remains poor, with median survival of 4 months for patients receiving state-of-the-art treatment. The main factors associated with survival are performance status at diagnosis, CSF protein level and triple-negative subtype. Headache is commonly the first clinical presentation of LC, and the diagnostic workup usually requires CSF-cytological analysis and or/MRI. The current management of LC consists of a combination of intra-CSF chemotherapy, systemic therapy, radiotherapy and/or best-supportive care. The standard intra-CSF chemotherapy regimen is methotrexate. Radiotherapy is used for relieving obstruction points on CSF-outflow channels due to ependymal nodules, tumor deposits or bulky disease. Objective responses have been reported with intrathecal administration of trastuzumab for HER2-positive disease, yet this strategy is still under investigation. Further prospective trials are needed to better address the impact of these treatment modalities on overall survival and quality of life.

Background: The role of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a biomarker in non-invasive breast cancer is unclear. This meta-analysis assessed the prognostic impact of TIL levels in patients with non-invasive breast cancer. Methods: Systematic literature search was performed to identify studies assessing local recurrence in patients with non-invasive breast cancer according to TIL levels (high vs. low). Subgroup analyses per local recurrence (invasive and non-invasive) were performed. Secondary objectives were the association between TIL levels and non-invasive breast cancer subtypes, age, grade and necrosis. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted from each study and a pooled analysis was conducted with random-effect model. Results: Seven studies (N = 3437) were included in the present meta-analysis. High-TILs were associated with a higher likelihood of local recurrence (invasive or non-invasive, N = 2941; OR 2.05; 95%CI, 1.03–4.08; p = 0.042), although with a lower likelihood of invasive local recurrence (N = 1722; OR 0.69; 95%CI, 0.49–0.99; p = 0.042). High-TIL levels were associated with triple-negative (OR 3.84; 95%CI, 2.23–6.61; p < 0.001) and HER2-positive (OR 6.27; 95%CI, 4.93–7.97; p < 0.001) subtypes, high grade (OR 5.15; 95%CI, 3.69–7.19; p < 0.001) and necrosis (OR 3.09; 95%CI, 2.33–4.10; p < 0.001). Conclusions: High-TIL levels were associated with more aggressive tumours, a higher likelihood of local recurrence (invasive or non-invasive) but a lower likelihood of invasive local recurrence in patients with non-invasive breast cancer., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Background There are limited data regarding the impact of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes in advanced breast cancer, especially in patients treated with endocrine therapy (ET) + cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. Methods A pooled analysis of individual patient-level data from MONARCH 2 and 3 trials was performed. Patients were classified according to baseline BMI into underweight ( Results This analysis included 1138 patients (757 received abemaciclib + ET and 381 placebo + ET). There was no difference in PFS between BMI categories in either group, although normal-weight patients presented a numerically higher benefit with abemaciclib + ET (Pinteraction = .07). Normal and/or underweight patients presented higher overall response rate in the abemaciclib + ET group compared with overweight and/or obese patients (49.4% vs 41.6%, odds ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval = 0.54 to 0.99) as well as higher neutropenia frequency (51.0% vs 40.4%, P = .004). Weight loss was more frequent in the abemaciclib + ET group (odds ratio = 3.23, 95% confidence interval = 2.09 to 5.01). Conclusions Adding abemaciclib to ET prolongs PFS regardless of BMI, showing that overweight or obese patients also benefit from this regimen. Our results elicit the possibility of a better effect of abemaciclib in normal and/or underweight patients compared with overweight and/or obese patients. More studies analyzing body composition parameters in patients under treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors may further clarify this hypothesis.

BACKGROUND As women living with HIV (WLWH) become older, their risk of developing breast cancer increases. Nonetheless, literature is conflicting regarding tumor stage, distribution of subtypes and overall survival among WLWH vs. HIV-negative women with breast cancer. We assessed differences in clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival between these two groups. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge, LILACS, SciELO and conference abstracts up to 1 January 2020. Cross-sectional/cohort studies comparing baseline characteristics (stage and/or subtypes) and/or overall survival of WLWH vs. HIV-negative women with breast cancer were included. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to estimate summary statistics and subgroup analyses according to region of the world. RESULTS Eighteen studies [4 from North America, 14 from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)] were included, with 3174 WLWH and 2 394 598 HIV-negative women. WLWH from North America and SSA were more likely to present with stage III/IV disease compared with HIV-negative women - pooled odds ratio (pOR) 1.76 [95% confidence interval (CI):1.58-1.95] and pOR 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06-1.42), respectively. WLWH from SSA were also less likely to have estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative tumors (pOR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.66-0.99). After adjustment, WLWH had worse overall survival compared with HIV-negative women, both in North America [pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.45; 95% CI: 1.11-5.41] and SSA (aHR 1.43; 95% CI: 1.06-1.92). CONCLUSION Compared with HIV-negative women, WLWH are diagnosed with breast cancer at a more advanced stage and have a worse overall survival. These results should raise awareness regarding the detection and survival gap among WLWH with breast cancer and further studies are needed to decipher the reasons behind these disparities.

Background: Obesity is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC) development, recurrence, and death. In view of this, we aimed to investigate the clinical value of obesity in BC patients treated with anti-HER2 therapies in the NeoALTTO trial, which randomized 455 patients to neo-adjuvant lapatinib, trastuzumab, or their combination plus paclitaxel. Methods: Patients were classified according to their basal body mass index (BMI) into underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal (≥ 18.5; < 25 kg/m2), overweight (≥ 25; < 30 kg/m2), and obese (≥ 30 kg/m2) WHO categories. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using BMI as a categorical variable. Pathological complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) were the NeoALTTO primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Results: Among 454 patients analyzed, 14 (3%), 220 (48%), 137 (30%), and 83 (18%) were classified as underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese, respectively; 231 (51%) and 223 (49%) had hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HR-negative primary tumors; 160 (35%) achieved pCR. In the overall patient population, no association was found between BMI groups and pCR, as we reported pCR rates of 57.1%, 35%, 30.7%, and 39.8% in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese cases, respectively. In contrast, in HR-positive tumors, overweight or obesity was generally associated with decreased likelihood of achieving a pCR independently of other clinical variables, including planned surgery, nodal status, and tumor size (odds ratio [OR] = 0.55, 95%CI 0.30–1.01, as compared to normal or underweight; p = 0.053); notably, no differential effect of BMI with respect to pCR was observed in HR-negative cases (odds ratio [OR] = 1.30, 95%CI 0.76–2.23, as compared to normal or underweight; p = 0.331), resulting in a statistically significant interaction between BMI and HR status (p = 0.036). There was no association between BMI and EFS neither in the overall nor in the HR-positive population, but this analysis was under-powered. Conclusions: NeoALTTO patients overweight or obese at baseline and with HR-positive primary BC appeared less likely to achieve pCR after neo-adjuvant anti-HER2 therapies. This finding paves the way to future research in targeting the interplay between HER2/HR signaling and metabolism., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

The growing availability of more effective therapies has contributed to an increased survival of patients with breast cancer. In hormone receptor-positive early disease, increased survival is strongly correlated with the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy, but this therapy can cause side-effects that have major consequences in terms of treatment adherence and patients' quality of life. In premenopausal breast cancer survivors, these side-effects might be even more prominent due to the abrupt suppression of oestrogen associated with the most intense endocrine therapies. An important ambition of cancer care in the 21st century is to recover pre-cancer quality of life and emotional and social functions, which is only possible through the mitigation of the side-effects of anticancer treatments. This Review presents a comprehensive summary of the efficacy and safety data of the available interventions (hormonal and non-hormonal pharmacological strategies, non-pharmacological approaches, and complementary and alternative medicine) to control selected side-effects associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy (hot flashes, sexual dysfunction, weight gain, musculoskeletal symptoms, and fatigue), providing updated, evidence-based approaches for their management.

Immunotherapy emerged as a new treatment modality for breast cancer, and its use is approved in combination with chemotherapy for first-line therapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer overexpressing PD-L1. As immune checkpoint inhibitors alone have modest clinical activity in advanced breast cancer, there is a growing interest in combinatorial modalities, and particularly for their rapid development in the early disease setting. The plethora of ongoing immunotherapy trials in early breast cancer comes at a time when solid data in advanced disease are still imperfect. This review offers a perspective on the efforts to establish the efficacy and safety of immunotherapeutic agents in early breast cancer.

Older patients now form between 30 and 40% of breast cancer (BC) patients. Managing older patients with BC is particularly challenging due to the limited availability of high-quality evidence. In this review we discuss the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of anti-HER2 agents in older patients with HER2-positive BC is presented, with a particular look at the latest results of promising new agents such trastuzumab-deruxtecan. The data suggest that older patients can expect similar efficacy when using standard regimens, with higher toxicity, particular cardiac toxicity and diarrhea. Anti-HER2 agents should thus be used in most older patients most as per standard of care as long as adequate follow-up is available to manage toxicities.

Treatment de-escalation in early-stage, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) has been attempted in order to decrease costs and toxicities. One of the strategies pursued is decreasing trastuzumab treatment duration, with mixed results thus far. Trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity, however, may be more frequent with 12 months of trastuzumab compared with shorter treatment lengths. Therefore, we have conducted a meta-analysis to address this question. Materials and methods A meta-analysis of trials testing 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab versus shorter regimens, reporting cardiac outcomes in patients with HER2-positive BC was performed with the random effects model with inverse variance weighting. Results Clinical cardiac dysfunction associated with 12 months of trastuzumab versus shorter trastuzumab regimens, including 11 250 patients, showed a pooled OR (pOR) of 1.90 (95% CI 1.37 to 2.64; p value, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

OBJECTIVE to evaluate plasma and salivary uracil (U) to dihydrouracil (UH2) ratios as tools for predicting 5-fluorouracil systemic exposure and drug-related severe toxicity, and clinically validate the use of dried saliva spots (DSS) as an alternative sampling strategy for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency assessment. METHODS Pre-chemotherapy plasma, fresh saliva and DSS samples were obtained from gastrointestinal patients (N = 40) for measurement of endogenous U and UH2 concentrations by LC-MS/MS. A second plasma sample collected during 5FU infusion was used for 5FU area under the curve (AUC) determination by HPLC-DAD. Data on toxicity was reported according to CTCAE. RESULTS 15% of the patients developed severe 5FU-related toxicity, with neutropenia accounting for 67% of the cases. U, UH2 and [UH2,]/[U] were highly correlated between fresh and dried saliva samples (rs = 0.960; rs = 0.828; rs = 0.910, respectively). 5FU AUC ranged from 11.3 to 37.31 mg h L-1, with 46.2% of under-dosed and 10.3% over-dosed patients. The [UH2]/[U] ratios in plasma, fresh saliva and dried saliva samples were moderately correlated with 5FU AUC and adverse events grade, indicating a partial contribution of the variables to drug exposure (r = -0.412, rs = -0.373, rs = 0.377) and toxicity (r = -0.363, rs = -0.523, rs = 0.542). Metabolic ratios were lower in patients with severe toxicity (P

PURPOSE: Breast cancer (BC) in young women is uncommon and tends to present with more aggressive characteristics. To better understand and characterize this scenario in Brazil through real-world data, we performed a subanalysis of AMAZONA III study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02663973). METHODS: The AMAZONA III study (GBECAM 0115) is a prospective registry that included 2,950 women newly diagnosed with invasive BC in Brazil from January 2016 until March 2018 at 22 sites. Valid data were obtained from 2,888 patients regarding age at diagnosis and complete baseline information. To compare epidemiologic and clinicopathological features at the time of diagnosis, patients with BC were divided into two groups according to age: ≤ 40 years and > 40 years. Quantitative variables were described as means, and categorical variables were described as frequencies and percentages and compared using the Pearson's χ2 test. RESULTS: Of 2,888 women diagnosed with BC, 486 (17%) were ≤ 40 years old. Young women had higher educational level, most were employed and a significant number were married (P < .001 for all associations). Younger patients were more symptomatic at BC diagnosis (P < .001), and they also presented more frequently with stage III, T3/T4, grade 3 tumors, HER-2-positive, luminal B, and triple-negative subtypes. CONCLUSION: Brazilian women younger than age 40 years have unfavorable clinicopathological features of BC at diagnosis, with more aggressive subtypes and advanced stage when compared with older women. These differences are not explained by socioeconomic or ethnic imbalances. The causes of a higher prevalence of BC among young women in Brazil deserve additional investigation., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

12067 Background: Improvements in breast cancer (BC) care have led to increased survival of patients; hence, more attention to long-term treatment-related adverse events and quality of life (QoL) is required. Symptoms of spontaneous and treatment-induced menopause significantly affect the QoL and adherence to endocrine therapy among BC survivors, with potential negative implications on outcome. Use of systemic hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to mitigate menopause-associated symptoms is not recommended to reduce the burden of these side effects being historically associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence. This systematic review and metanalysis aimed to estimate the effect of HRT on risk of disease recurrence in BC survivors. Methods: A systematic search of Pubmed and Embase libraries up to January 15, 2021, was conducted in order to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the risk of disease recurrence with the use of HRT in BC survivors. We used the random-effect model to calculate the overall risk of recurrence, reported as pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Moreover, we performed a subgroup analysis to estimate the risk of recurrence according to hormone receptor status. The Higgins I2 index was computed to assess the heterogeneity between studies. The likelihood of publication bias was assessed by Egger’s test. Results: Four RCTs were found and three were included in the metanalysis (n = 3.973 patients); one study (n = 100 patients) was excluded due to the impossibility to extract the HR for disease recurrence. Overall, 1.990 patients were randomized to receive HRT (estrogen-progesteron combination or tibolone), while 1.983 patients were included in control groups (placebo or no HRT). As compared to control group, HRT significantly increased the risk of BC recurrence (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.15-1.93, p = 0.002). The heterogeneity between the studies was low (39%, p = 0.194), and no publication bias was found ( p = 0.537). Two studies reported the HR according to hormone receptor status. At the subgroups analysis, the risk of BC recurrence with the use of HRT was significantly increased in hormone receptor-positive patients (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.15-2.82, p = 0.010) but not in those with hormone receptor-negative tumors (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.83-1.88, p = 0.290). Conclusions: Use of HRT significantly increases the risk of recurrence in BC survivors, particularly in those with hormone receptor-positive disease. Therefore, this approach remains contraindicated in this setting. Alternative interventions to mitigate menopause-related symptoms should be proposed to these patients.

Background Early stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a high risk of distant relapse. Because TNBC does not currently have specific targeted agents approved for use in the early setting it is treated primarily with chemotherapy. TNBC may be more immunogenic than other subtypes of breast cancer. On March 8th 2019, the Food and Drug Administration approved anti–PD-L1 antibody, atezolizumab, in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of PD-L1-positive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic TNBC based on the results of the randomized phase 3 IMpassion130 trial. ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 is a global, prospective, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial currently investigating the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic profile of adjuvant atezolizumab plus standard anthracycline/taxane adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in early stage TNBC. Trial design ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 will randomize 2300 patients with operable stage II-III TNBC, confirmed by central pathology review. Patients are stratified by type of surgery, nodal status, and centrally assessed PD-L1 status. Adjuvant chemotherapy consist of weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for 12 weeks followed by dose dense anthracycline (epirubicin 90 mg/m2 or doxorubicin 60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 for 4 doses every 2 weeks or the same chemotherapy regimen (T-EC/AC) given concomitantly with atezolizumab 840 mg every 2 weeks followed by maintenance atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks until completion of 1 year of atezolizumab. The primary end-point is invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and secondary end-points include iDFS by PD-L1 and lymph node status, overall survival, safety, patient functioning and health related quality of life (HRQoL). Tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for biomarker research. The first site was activated May 4th 2018, and approximately 430 sites are expected to open globally in 30 countries. This trial is sponsored by Roche and conducted in partnership with the Breast International Group, Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Institute Jules Bordet and Alliance Foundation Trials. Clinical trial identification NCT03498716. Legal entity responsible for the study This trial is sponsored by Roche and conducted in partnership with the Breast International Group, Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Institute Jules Bordet and Alliance Foundation Trials. Funding Roche. Disclosure M. Ignatiadis: Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Tesaro; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Janssen Diagnostics, Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer,Bayer. H.L. McArthur: Advisory / Consultancy: LIlly, Amgen, Immunomedics, Pfizer, Genentech, BMS, Genomic Health, Merck, spectrum pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS, Lilly, Merck, Ziopharm Oncology. J. Martinez: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, Novartis, Tesaro, Servier, GlaxoSmithKline.. C. Lai: Full / Part-time employment: Roche/Genentech; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche/Genentech. T. Goulioti: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, Novartis, Tesaro, Servier, GlaxoSmithKline.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: GlaxoSmithKline; Spouse / Financial dependant: GlaxoSmithKline, UCB. A. Bouhlel: Full / Part-time employment: Roche. V. Balta: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, Novartis, Tesaro, Servier, GlaxoSmithKline.. G. Viale: Honoraria (self): MSD Oncology; Advisory / Consultancy: Dako, Roche/genentech, Astellas Pharma, Novartis; Research grant / Funding (self): Roche/genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Ventana Medical Systems, Dako/Agilent Technologies; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche, Celgene. D.A. Nguyen: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche/Genentech; Full / Part-time employment: Roche/Genentech. R.D. Gelber: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Ferring, Ipsen, AstraZeneca. M. Piccart: Officer / Board of Directors: Radius; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Odonate, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Camel-IDS, Crescendo Biologics, Periphagen, Huya, Debiopharm, PharmaMar, G1 Therapeutics, Menarini, Seattle Genetics, Immunomedics, Oncolytics; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Synthon, Radius, Servier. E.P. Winer: Honoraria (self): Genentech, Leap, Carrick Therapeutics, Lilly, Seattle Genetics, GSK. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

e14019 Background: Severe dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency can be lethal in 0.5-3.0% of patients receiving fluoropyrimidines. Unfortunately, there is no routine test in medical practice to identify high-risk patients. Here, we evaluated the use of plasma and saliva uracil (U) to dihydrouracil (UH2) metabolic ratio and DPYD genotyping, as a means to identify patients with DPD deficiency and fluoropyrimidine toxicity. In addition, we report on a functional test using UH2/U metabolic ratio in dried saliva spots (DSS). Methods: Prior to fluoropyrimidine therapy, plasma and saliva samples were obtained from 60 patients with GI cancer. U and UH2 levels were measured by LC-MS/MS in plasma and saliva. Patients were also genotyped for DPYD (*7/*2A/*13/Y186C). WHO grading were used to report treatment toxicity. Results: In 21 patients (35%) toxicity was documented. For those, no variant allele carrier for DPYD was identified. The UH2/U metabolic ratios were 0.1-26.7 in plasma and 0.1-24.0 in saliva, with a higher correlation with toxicity grade in saliva as compared to plasma (rs 0.52 vs 0.28). Median metabolic ratios were lower in patients with severe toxicity as compared to those with no toxicity (0.59 vs 2.83 saliva; 1.62 vs 6.75 plasma, P < 0.01). A cut-off of 1.16 for the salivary UH2/U ratio was set (AUC 0.84) with 86% sensitivity and 77% specificity for the identification of grade 3-4 toxicity. A plasma cut-off of 4.0 (AUC 0.75) revealed a 71% sensitivity and 76% specificity. Moreover, saliva of 21 patients were applied to filter paper to obtain DSS and sent to the laboratory by regular mail. U and UH2 were stable in DSS stored at 45°C up to 7 days. In this set of patients, grade 3-4 toxicity was documented in 3/21 cases (14%), all three cases had metabolic ratios below 1.16 in DSS, confirming our prior results. Conclusions: DPYD genotyping failed to identify severe DPD deficiency, but the UH2/U metabolic ratios in saliva showed enough sensitivity and specificity to deserve further evaluation. DSS samples allowed medical oncologists working at distant sites to send us samples by post, with results available within a week. This test is being validated in a larger sample population.

e20568 Background: Brain metastases (BM) are common and affects near half of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with poor prognosis. Few data is available about this group of patients and Brazilian are underrepresented. Methods: Patients with NSCLC that developed BM between January 05 and December 15 at Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre were identified and medical records were reviewed. OS and PFS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with survival. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 22.0. Results: 113 patients were identified. Mean age was 60.1 ± 8.7 years, 50% were female, 84% were Caucasian, 87% had a positive smoking history, 71% had adenocarcinoma histology and 72% had stage IV disease at presentation. BM was present at initial diagnosis in 38% of patients. At diagnosis of BM, 39% of patients had a Karnofsky performance status < 70, 20% had systemic disease under control, 31% had more than 3 brain lesions and 81% had a GPA score ≤2. 35 patients (31%) were submitted to either surgery or stereotaxic radiotherapy (SRDT), 52 (46%) to whole brain radiation (WBRT) and 26 (23%) to best supportive care (BSC). With a median follow-up of 11.2 months, 96% of patients have died. The OS was 11.2 months (95% IC, 9.4 to 13.1). The median survival time following diagnosis of BM was 4.9 months and survival according to treatment was 16.3 months for resection, 8.9 months for SRDT, 3.8 months for WBRT and 0.7 months for BSC. A Karnofsky performance status < 70 at diagnosis of BM and palliative treatment to BM (WBRT or BSC) were associated with worse outcome in multivariate analysis. The GPA score wasn't statically associated with prognosis. A longer survival of patients submitted to WBRT was seen when compare to BSC, HR of 0.38. There is a trend for longer survival in patients submitted to BM resection when compared to SRDT, but without statically significance. Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the largest report of NSCLC patients with BM from Latin America. Our data is in line with previous reports. A poor Karnofsky performance status and palliative treatment to BM are associated with poor survival. WBRT is associated with longer survival when compared to BSC in all the GPA score stratus.