Search

Purpose Assessment of HER2 overexpression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridisation (ISH) for the detection of HER2 amplifications is standard to identify patients for established HER2-directed treatments. Patients with lower HER2 expression levels have recently also become candidates for novel therapies targeting HER2. This study aimed to assess tumour and patient characteristics and prognosis in patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC), relative to low HER2 expression levels. Methods PRAEGNANT is a prospective aBC registry (NCT02338167), focusing on molecular biomarkers. Patients in all therapy lines receiving any kind of treatment are eligible. This analysis includes patients with conventionally HER2-negative aBC. Clinical outcome was compared in the groups with no (IHC score 0) or with low HER2 expression (IHC 1+, or IHC 2+/ISH negative). Results Low HER2 expression levels in triple-negative aBC patients did not influence progression-free survival. Overall survival appeared poorer in patients with IHC 2+ compared with patients with no HER2 expression in the unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 0.1.12–4.47). However, this effect was not maintained in the adjusted analysis. In HER2-negative, hormone receptor–positive patients, low HER2 expression appeared to have no effect on prognosis, neither progression-free survival nor overall survival. Conclusions We could not demonstrate that HER2 expression at a low level and assessed in clinical routine can differentiate patients into prognostic groups. However, the prevalence of patients with a low expression makes this population interesting for clinical trials with potentially active treatments using HER2 as a target.

Summary Background The development of anti-HER2 antibody–drug conjugates opens new therapeutic options for patients with breast cancer, including patients with low expression of HER2. To characterise this new breast cancer subtype, we have compared the clinical and molecular characteristics of HER2-low-positive and HER2-zero breast cancer, including response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis. Methods In this pooled analysis of individual patient data, we evaluated a cohort of 2310 patients with HER2-non-amplified primary breast cancer that were treated with neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy in four prospective neoadjuvant clinical trials (GeparSepto, NCT01583426 ; GeparOcto, NCT02125344 ; GeparX, NCT02682693 ; Gain-2 neoadjuvant, NCT01690702 ) between July 30, 2012, and March 20, 2019. Central HER2 testing was done prospectively before random assignment of participants in all trials. HER2-low-positive status was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or IHC2+/in-situ hybridisation negative and HER2-zero was defined as IHC0, based on the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. Disease-free survival and overall survival data were available for 1694 patients (from all trials except GeparX) with a median follow-up of 46·6 months (IQR 35·0–52·3). Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models and Cox-proportional hazards models were performed based on a predefined statistical analysis plan for analysis of the endpoints pathological complete response, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Findings A total of 1098 (47·5%) of 2310 tumours were HER2-low-positive and 1212 (52·5%) were HER2-zero. 703 (64·0%) of 1098 patients with HER2-low-positive tumours were hormone receptor positive, compared with 445 (36·7%) of 1212 patients with HER2-zero tumours (p Interpretation Our results show that HER2-low-positive tumours can be identified as new subgroup of breast cancer by standardised IHC, distinct from HER2-zero tumours. HER2-low-positive tumours have a specific biology and show differences in response to therapy and prognosis, which is particularly relevant in therapy-resistant, hormone receptor-negative tumours. Our results provide a basis for a better understanding of the biology of breast cancer subtypes and the refinement of future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Funding German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe).

Background: Many loci have been found to be associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, although there is considerable variation in progression-free survival (PFS), no loci have been found to be associated with outcome at genome-wide levels of significance. Methods: We carried out a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of PFS in 2,352 women with EOC who had undergone cytoreductive surgery and standard carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy. Results: We found seven SNPs at 12q24.33 associated with PFS (P < 5 × 10–8), the top SNP being rs10794418 (HR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15–1.34; P = 1.47 × 10–8). High expression of a nearby gene, ULK1, is associated with shorter PFS in EOC, and with poor prognosis in other cancers. SNP rs10794418 is also associated with expression of ULK1 in ovarian tumors, with the allele associated with shorter PFS being associated with higher expression, and chromatin interactions were detected between the ULK1 promoter and associated SNPs in serous and endometrioid EOC cell lines. ULK1 knockout ovarian cancer cell lines showed significantly increased sensitivity to carboplatin in vitro. Conclusions: The locus at 12q24.33 represents one of the first genome-wide significant loci for survival for any cancer. ULK1 is a plausible candidate for the target of this association. Impact: This finding provides insight into genetic markers associated with EOC outcome and potential treatment options. See related commentary by Peres and Monteiro, p. 1604

ZusammenfassungDie diesjährige 17. St.-Gallen(SG)-Konsensus-Konferenz zur Behandlung von Patientinnen mit frühem Mammakarzinom (SG-BCC) stand unter dem Motto „Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer“ und fokussierte auf die Herausforderung, die Behandlung des frühen Mammakarzinoms zielgerichteter auf die individuelle Krankheitssituation zu adaptieren. Wie schon in den vergangenen Jahren hat auch dieses Jahr eine deutsche Arbeitsgruppe führender Brustkrebsexpert*innen die Ergebnisse der internationalen SG-BCC 2021 vor dem Hintergrund der deutschen Therapieempfehlungen für den Klinikalltag in Deutschland diskutiert. Der Vergleich der SG-Empfehlungen mit den erst kürzlich aktualisierten Therapieempfehlungen der Kommission Mamma der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie e. V. (AGO) sowie der S3-Leitlinie ist hilfreich, da sich das SG-BCC-Panel aus Experten unterschiedlicher Länder zusammensetzt, weshalb länderspezifische Besonderheiten in die SG-Empfehlungen einfließen können. Die deutschen Therapieempfehlungen der AGO sowie der S3-Leitlinie basieren auf der aktuellen Evidenz. Gleichwohl muss jede Therapieentscheidung immer einer Nutzen-Risiko-Abwägung für die individuelle Situation unterzogen und mit der Patientin besprochen werden.

The continuous availability of findings from new studies repeatedly results in updated treatment recommendations and guidelines. In the case of breast carcinoma in particular, several studies have been published in the last few years that have transformed how early and advanced breast carcinoma is being treated. However, this by no means means implies that there is agreement among all experts on specific issues. It is precisely the diversity of interpretation of guidelines and study findings that reflects the constantly changing available data and its complexity, as well as the availability of new drugs. In recent years, new substances such as pertuzumab, T-DM1, neratinib and capecitabine have become available to treat patients with early stages of breast carcinoma. Furthermore, the first results on the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors for adjuvant treatment have now been published. Last but not least, the use of multigene tests to avoid the necessity of chemotherapy in certain patients is still under discussion. This review summarises the state of the data and publishes the results of the survey completed by experts at the 2021 St. Gallen Breast Cancer Conference on early-stage breast cancer.

Background More and more information about complementary and integrative medicine is becoming available, especially among cancer patients. However, little is known about the use of herbal medicine by patients with gynecologic cancers. This study aimed to assess the use of herbal products by gynecologic cancer patients compared with healthy controls. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department for Gynecology and Obstetrics of Erlangen University Hospital and included 201 patients with gynecologic cancer and 212 healthy controls. Use of herbal medicines was evaluated using a standardized questionnaire. Medical information on cancer patients was collected from hospital records. Group comparisons were done using a logistic regression model. Risk ratios were assessed using a Poisson regression model. Results Gynecologic cancer patients used herbal medicine significantly less often than healthy persons. 69% of gynecologic cancer patients and 81% of healthy participants reported using herbal products. 40% of cancer patients and 56% of healthy persons reported using plants for medicinal purposes. Motives of cancer patients for using herbal medicine included treatment of cancer-related symptoms. The major source of information for both groups was family and friends. Conclusions Although herbal medicine was used less by patients with gynecologic cancer, herbal products were used by both cancer patients and healthy individuals. To provide cancer patients with optimal therapy, oncologists should be informed about the herbal products used by their patients as this will allow them to take their patientsʼ self-medication with herbal medicine into account. Counseling by oncologists on the use of herbal medicine should be encouraged.

AIM To evaluate HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) with a low hormone receptor (HR) expression, with regard to pathological complete response (pCR) and survival, in comparison to triple-negative BC (TNBC) and strong HR-positive BC. METHODS We compared negative oestrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) {\textless}1{\%}, low-positive (ER and/or PR 1-9{\%})~and strong-positive (ER or PR 10-100{\%}) HR-expression in neoadjuvant clinical trial cohorts (n~=~2765) of BC patients. End-points were disease-free survival (DFS), distant-disease free survival (DDFS)~and overall survival (OS). We performed RNA sequencing on available tumour tissue samples from patients with low-HR expression (n~=~38). RESULTS Ninety-four (3.4{\%}) patients had low HR-positive tumours, 1769 (64.0{\%}) had strong HR-positive tumours, and 902 (32.6{\%}) had TNBC. There were no significant differences in pCR rates between women with low HR-positive tumours (27.7{\%}) and women with TNBC (35.5{\%}). DFS and DDFS were also not different for DFS, hazard ratio 1.26, 95{\%}-CI (confidence interval) : 0.87-1.83, log-rank test p~=~0.951; for DDFS, hazard ratio 1.17, 95{\%}-CI: 0.78-1.76, log-rank test p~=~0.774. Patients with strong HR-positive tumours had a significantly lower pCR rate (pCR 9.4{\%}; odds ratio 0.38, 95{\%}-CI: 0.23-0.63), but better DFS (hazard ratio 0.48, 95{\%}-CI: 0.33-0.70) and DDFS (hazard ratio 0.49, 95{\%}-CI: 0.33-0.74) than patients with low HR-positive tumours. Molecular subtyping (RNA sequencing) of low HR-positive tumours classified these predominantly into a basal subtype (86.8{\%}). CONCLUSION Low HR-positive, HER2-negative tumours have a similar clinical behaviour to TNBC showing high pCR rates and poor survival and also a basal-like gene expression signature. Patients with low HR-positive tumours should be regarded as candidates for therapy strategies targeting TNBC.

Advanced Breast Cancer; Efficacy; Margetuximab Cáncer de mama avanzado; Eficacia; Margetuximab Càncer de mama avançat; Eficàcia; Margetuximab Importance ERRB2 (formerly HER2)–positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) remains typically incurable with optimal treatment undefined in later lines of therapy. The chimeric antibody margetuximab shares ERBB2 specificity with trastuzumab but incorporates an engineered Fc region to increase immune activation. Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of margetuximab vs trastuzumab, each with chemotherapy, in patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive ABC. Design, Setting, and Participants The SOPHIA phase 3 randomized open-label trial of margetuximab plus chemotherapy vs trastuzumab plus chemotherapy enrolled 536 patients from August 26, 2015, to October 10, 2018, at 166 sites in 17 countries. Eligible patients had disease progression on 2 or more prior anti-ERBB2 therapies and 1 to 3 lines of therapy for metastatic disease. Data were analyzed from February 2019 to October 2019. Interventions Investigators selected chemotherapy before 1:1 randomization to margetuximab, 15 mg/kg, or trastuzumab, 6 mg/kg (loading dose, 8 mg/kg), each in 3-week cycles. Stratification factors were metastatic sites (≤2, >2), lines of therapy (≤2, >2), and chemotherapy choice. Main Outcomes and Measures Sequential primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by central blinded analysis and overall survival (OS). All α was allocated to PFS, followed by OS. Secondary end points were investigator-assessed PFS and objective response rate by central blinded analysis. Results A total of 536 patients were randomized to receive margetuximab (n = 266) or trastuzumab (n = 270). The median age was 56 (27-86) years; 266 (100%) women were in the margetuximab group, while 267 (98.9%) women were in the trastuzumab group. Groups were balanced. All but 1 patient had received prior pertuzumab, and 489 (91.2%) had received prior ado-trastuzumab emtansine. Margetuximab improved primary PFS over trastuzumab with 24% relative risk reduction (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P = .03; median, 5.8 [95% CI, 5.5-7.0] months vs 4.9 [95% CI, 4.2-5.6] months; October 10, 2018). After the second planned interim analysis of 270 deaths, median OS was 21.6 months with margetuximab vs 19.8 months with trastuzumab (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.13; P = .33; September 10, 2019), and investigator-assessed PFS showed 29% relative risk reduction favoring margetuximab (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.86; P

Background: It is not known whether modifiable lifestyle factors that predict survival after invasive breast cancer differ by subtype. Methods: We analyzed data for 121,435 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 67 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium with 16,890 deaths (8,554 breast cancer specific) over 10 years. Cox regression was used to estimate associations between risk factors and 10-year all-cause mortality and breast cancer–specific mortality overall, by estrogen receptor (ER) status, and by intrinsic-like subtype. Results: There was no evidence of heterogeneous associations between risk factors and mortality by subtype (Padj > 0.30). The strongest associations were between all-cause mortality and BMI ≥30 versus 18.5–25 kg/m2 [HR (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19 (1.06–1.34)]; current versus never smoking [1.37 (1.27–1.47)], high versus low physical activity [0.43 (0.21–0.86)], age ≥30 years versus 0– Conclusions: We confirm associations between modifiable lifestyle factors and 10-year all-cause mortality. There was no strong evidence that associations differed by ER status or intrinsic-like subtype. Impact: Given the large dataset and lack of evidence that associations between modifiable risk factors and 10-year mortality differed by subtype, these associations could be cautiously used in prognostication models to inform patient-centered care.

ZusammenfassungNachdem in den letzten Jahren bei der Behandlung von Patientinnen mit fortgeschrittenem Mammakarzinom zunehmend Substanzen mit einer guten Effektivität zum Einsatz kommen, die spezifische Signalwege angreifen, sind nun neue Therapien und Ansätze hinzugekommen, die sich tatsächlich auf ganz spezifische Veränderungen beziehen wie die Behandlung von Patientinnen mit HR+/HER2−-Tumoren mit einer PIK3CA-Mutation. Ebenso ist die Behandlung von Patientinnen mit einer BRCA1- oder BRCA2-Mutation durch die Einführung der PARP-Inhibitoren verbessert worden. Nun wird zunehmend versucht, Therapieindikationen aufgrund molekularer Muster auszudehnen und weitere Patientinnen zu identifizieren, die von einer Therapie profitieren könnten, und die neu etablierten Therapiemethoden in bestehende Therapiesequenzen einzubinden. Diese Übersichtsarbeit fasst die neuesten Erkenntnisse in diesem Zusammenhang zusammen.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 play a central role in DNA repair. Therefore, patients harbouring germline (g) BRCA1/2 mutations (m) treated with chemotherapy might be at higher risk of haematological toxicities.Patients from German Breast Group (GBG) and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie-breast group studies with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and known gBRCA1/2m status treated with anthracycline-taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analysed. Primary objective was the rate of neutropenia grade (G)III-IV in cycle 1 (C1). Secondary objectives included effects on overall and other haematological toxicities GIII-IV in C1, cumulative haematological toxicity across all cycles, relative total dose intensity, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis. Haematological toxicities under taxanes, carboplatin, and cyclophosphamide were explored.Two hundred nine of 1171 (17.8%) evaluated patients had gBRCA1/2m. In C1, 37.4% gBRCA1/2m versus 35.7% wild-type patients had neutropenia GIII-IV (P = 0.683). For C1, gBRCA1/2m predicted neither for neutropenia GIII-IV (odds ratio [OR]: 1.26, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.87-1.82, P = 0.226) nor for other haematological toxicities GIII-IV (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.64-1.31, P = 0.625) in multivariable regression models. Analyses of cumulative toxicities across all cycles yielded similar results except thrombocytopaenia GIII-IV, which was increased in gBRCA1m patients. In patients treated with taxanes, the rate of haematological toxicities GIII-IV was higher in gBRCA1/2m compared with wild-type (59.5% versus 43.1%; p 0.001). No difference was seen under cyclophosphamide or platinum-containing chemotherapies.gBRCA1/2m was not associated with higher risk of overall severe haematological toxicities in the first cycle or cumulatively across all cycles under standard chemotherapy for TNBC. Under taxane, patients with gBRCA1/2m might have a higher risk of haematological toxicities GIII-IV, requiring further research.

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) beschreibt eine Technologie zur Sequenzierung des gesamten Genoms, Exoms und Transkriptoms und hat die genomische Forschung revolutioniert. Im Vergleich zur Sanger-Sequenzierung kann nun ein komplettes menschliches Genom binnen eines Tages sequenziert werden. Die Ergebnisse konnen mit menschlichen Referenzgenomen abgeglichen werden. Durch Fragmentation der DNA, Adaption mittels Adapter an die Bruchstucke und Amplifikation der Fragmente erfolgt eine bioinformatische Analyse, die in Form eines DNA-Chips gespeichert und sequenziert wird. NGS findet viele Anwendungsbereiche, vor allem in der genetischen, mikrobiologischen und onkologischen Forschung, und hat sich bisher noch nicht flachendeckend im klinischen Alltag etabliert. In der Gynakologie wird NGS insbesondere in der nichtinvasiven Pranataldiagnostik (NIPT), in der Reproduktionsmedizin und in der Onkologie eingesetzt.

Purpose: We evaluated mRNA signatures to predict response to neoadjuvant PD-L1 inhibition in combination with chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer. Experimental Design: Targeted mRNA sequencing of 2,559 transcripts was performed in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from 162 patients of the GeparNuevo trial. We focused on validation of four predefined gene signatures and differential gene expression analyses for new predictive markers. Results: Two signatures [GeparSixto signature (G6-Sig) and IFN signature (IFN-Sig)] were predictive for treatment response in a multivariate model including treatment arm [G6-Sig: OR, 1.558; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.130–2.182; P = 0.008 and IFN-Sig: OR, 1.695; 95% CI, 1.234–2.376; P = 0.002), while the CYT metric predicted pathologic complete response (pCR) in the durvalumab arm, and the proliferation-associated gene signature in the placebo arm. Expression of PD-L1 mRNA was associated with better response in both arms, indicating that increased levels of PD-L1 are a general predictor of neoadjuvant therapy response. In an exploratory analysis, we identified seven genes that were higher expressed in responders in the durvalumab arm, but not the placebo arm: HLA-A, HLA-B, TAP1, GBP1, CXCL10, STAT1, and CD38. These genes were associated with cellular antigen processing and presentation and IFN signaling. Conclusions: Immune-associated signatures are associated with pCR after chemotherapy, but might be of limited use for the prediction of response to additional immune checkpoint blockade. Gene expressions related to antigen presentation and IFN signaling might be interesting candidates for further evaluation.

Introduction: RIBECCA is a national, multi-center, open-label, single-arm phase IIIb trial assessing the efficacy and safety of ribociclib in combination with letrozole in a patient population similar to the populations of MONALEESA-2, -3 and -7, including premenopausal and postmenopausal patients without pretreatment as well as patients with up to 3 previous treatment lines for advanced disease. Here we present the final analysis for the primary endpoint. Methods:The study enrolled women or men with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer irrespective of their menopausal status, who were not amenable to curative treatment by surgery or radiotherapy. Histological or cytological confirmation of HR+, HER2- breast cancer was required. 502 patients were enrolled in two Cohorts. Cohort A (n=319): postmenopausal women and men without pretreatment for advanced disease; Cohort B (n=183): premenopausal women without pretreatment for advanced disease and pre- or postmenopausal women and men with ≤ 1 line of chemotherapy and/or ≤ 2 lines of endocrine therapy in the advanced situation. The primary endpoint was to assess the clinical benefit rate (CBR, defined as CR, PR or SD, or NCRNPD) at 24 weeks for the overall study population. Secondary endpoints included: progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and changes in quality of life as assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 and -BR23 questionnaires. Results: The study ended 84 weeks after the enrollment of the last patient. The median observation time was 10.6 months (0.1-38 months). Baseline characteristics: of 502 pts, 5 were male, 497 were female(46 pre-or perimenopausal, 451 postmenopausal); median age: 64 yrs; ECOG 0-1: 96.8%; 71.1 % of pts had bone metastases (40.8% bone only), 30.6% liver, 27.5% lung and 30.1% other metastases. 97.3% had at least 1 metastatic site: 48.7% had 1, 35.1% had 2, 12.9% had 3 and 1.6% had 4 metastatic sites, respectively. 78.9% received at least one prior antineoplastic therapy: 4.9% received neoadjuvant, 56.8% adjuvant and 37.8% palliative treatment as last antineoplastic therapy before study start. The most common treatment emergent AEs (all grades) were neutropenia and/or neutrophil count decreased (60.6%), nausea (42%), fatigue (39.2%), alopecia (35.1%), leukopenia or WBC decreased (30.7%), nasopharyngitis (28.5%), diarrhea (25.3%), ALT increased (22.9%) and AST increased (20.7%). The CBR at week 24 for the overall study population was 69.2%. Median PFS was 16.5 [95%CI 13.7; 19.3] months in the overall study population, 21.8 [15.4; 25.3] months and 9.3 [8.1; 16.3] months in Cohort A and B, respectively. At 72 weeks, the Kaplan-Meier estimate for OS was 86.8% [83.3; 89.6]. Because of the low number of events during the study period, median OS could not be determined. Conclusion: The results of the final analysis confirmed clinical benefit of ribociclib and letrozole in this patient population. No new safety signals emerged. Citation Format: Mattea Reinisch, Arndt Nusch, Thomas Decker, Andreas Hartkopf, Bernhard J Heinrich, Christian M Kurbacher, Roswitha Fuchs, Hans Tesch, Petra Krabisch, Sara Y Brucker, Tanja Fehm, Wolfgang Janni, Sherko Kuemmel, Diana Lüftner, Andreas Schneeweiss, Martin Schuler, Claudia Voges, Joerg Schubert, Peter A Fasching. Ribecca - a phase 3b, multi-center, open label study for women with estrogen receptor positive, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with ribociclib (lee011) in combination with letrozole: Final results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-31.

Background: In MONALEESA-3 and MONALEESA-7 trials, ribociclib (RIB, a selective CDK4/6 inhibitor) in combination with endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitor [AI] or fulvestrant [FUL]) demonstrated a significant prolongation of overall survival among patients with breast cancer (BC), regardless of menopausal status and treatment-line. In the premenopausal or perimenopausal women, RIB + AI/FUL should be combined with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. The real-world evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of RIB + AI/FUL in the routine clinical practice is needed to support the use of this combination. Methods: RIBANNA is a prospective, non-interventional study ongoing in Germany since October 2017. Pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women (planned, n = 3020) treated with RIB + AI/FUL, or endocrine monotherapy (ET), or chemotherapy (CT) as the first-line treatment for HR+/HER2- aBC in accordance with German guidelines were included. Data from routine clinical practice in all 3 cohorts, including further lines of sequential therapy, were collected. Updated data on baseline demographics and safety analysis will be presented. Additionally, first experience with CANKADO, an innovative digital and patient-friendly application for electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement, are described. By combining this app to Kardia mobile (AliveCor’s single lead device), single-lead ECG can be recorded and sent via the CANKADO app for a cardiologist to read over. The cardiologist reviews the measurements, and reports the corrected QT interval by Fredericia (QTcF) results towards the trial site. Impact of the use of CANKADO onto the clinical routine will be analyzed. Results: For the second interim analysis, 1141 patients were enrolled until July 12th, 2019, while the full analysis set comprised 813 patients (Table 1). Median duration of RIB exposure in patients on RIB + AI/FUL vs total population was 151 vs 150 days respectively. At cut-off date, patients received first-line (89%, n = 1016), second-line (7%, n = 82), and third-line treatments (1%, n = 11). A starting dose of 600 mg per day for RIB in the first-line setting was seen in most of the patients (85%); data of second-line patients will be reported later. The first-line mean daily dose of RIB was 451.6 mg/day RIB was prescribed mainly in combination with letrozole (75%), fulvestrant (12%), anastrozole (7%), and exemestane (6%). A total of 62% of patients in the study were documented as therapy-naïve for ET. Of 424 patients with early breast cancer, 129 (30%) had documented prior CT without ET. The most common all-grade adverse events frequently noted in RIB + AI/FUL cohort in comparison with other cohorts were nausea (RIB [19%] vs ET [9%] vs CT [11%]), neutropenia (19% vs 1% vs 10%), fatigue (17% vs 9% vs 14%), and leukopenia (14% vs 4% vs 12%). The usage of CANKADO application to assess QTcF was initiated in the year 2019 and first data will be presented. Conclusion: RIBANNA study showed diverse population characteristics among the patients who received RIB treatment in a real-world setting. The third interim analysis is planned in October 2020, and the updated baseline data, information on safety, digital ECG measurement using CANKADO application will be presented. Baseline Demographic Characteristics as of Second Interim AnalysisDemographic VariableRIB + AI/FUL (n = 658)Endocrine Therapy (n = 78)Chemotherapy (n = 77)Mean age, years (SD)67 (11)72 (12)62 (10)Mean time since initial diagnosis, years6.17.23.6T stage at baseline*, n (%)TX204 (31)28 (36)18 (23)T0+T1132 (20)12 (15)11 (14)T2-T4302 (46)35 (45)42 (54)N stage at baseline*, n (%)NX212 (32)29 (37)28 (36)N0+N1317 (48)36 (46)35 (46)N2+N3108 (16)10 (13)8 (10)M stage at baseline*, n (%)MX6 (1)0 (0)0 (0)M018 (3)1 (1)1 (1)M1616 (94)75 (96)71 (92)Metastatic location at baseline*, n (%)CNS, liver, lungs258 (39)14 (18)42 (54)Bone only181 (28)42 (54)11 (14)Skin, lymph nodes, other149 (23)16 (20)14 (18)*Remaining cases are missing.CNS, central nervous system. Citation Format: Achim Wöckel, Cosima Brucker, Thomas Decker, Jörg Falbrede, Helmut Forstbauer, Thomas Göhler, Oliver Hoffmann, Christian Jackisch, Jan Janssen, Andreas Köhler, Kerstin Lüdtke-Heckenkamp, Diana Lüftner, Frederik Marmé, Arnd Nusch, Toralf Reimer, Christian Roos, Marcus Schmidt, Rudolf Weide, Peter Fasching. Real-world efficacy of ribociclib + aromatase inhibitor/fulvestrant, or endocrine monotherapy, or chemotherapy as first-line treatment in women with HR-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: Third interim analysis from the RIBANNA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-16.

Background: Cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT) in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP) is standard of care for patients (pts) diagnosed with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). While highly effective, the toxicity associated with CT is challenging. In KRISTINE/TRIO-021, neoadjuvant T-DM1 was combined with pertuzumab (KP) and compared to standard TCHP. Pts. received six cycles of neoadjuvant treatment followed by adjuvant therapy (KP or HP). Pts. in the KP arm were allowed to receive standard adjuvant CT. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was significantly lower with KP versus TCHP and more pts. had disease progression prior to surgery with KP, resulting in a meaningfully lower event-free survival rate vs. the control (85.3% vs 94.2%). However, 3-year invasive disease-free survival was numerically similar in both arms. Neoadjuvant KP demonstrated less toxicity than standard CT, although treatment discontinuation was higher post-surgery. Association of KP and TCHP with treatment-related amenorrhea (TRA) in premenopausal EBC pts. has not been ascertained. Methods: All pts. with premenopausal status at study entry (those not meeting the menopause definition based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines v3, 2012) and with menstrual period documented within 3 months of randomization, were independently evaluated for presence or absence of TRA by two reviewers. TRA, a prespecified exploratory endpoint of KRISTINE, was defined as cessation of menstruation for >12 months in the absence of treatment with ovarian suppression or other interventions that can induce amenorrhea. Pts. were followed from the time of study entry through the 3-year follow up period after surgery. For cases with inconsistent determination between the two reviewers, a third reviewer adjudicated. TRA rates were calculated per arm, hormone-receptor (HR) status, adjuvant CT and age group. Proportions were compared by estimating the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval. Results: Of 444 pts. enrolled, 205 were excluded based on being post-menopausal per NCCN guidelines. Of 239 pts. remaining, 56 were excluded due to insufficient data. The median age of pts. included was 40 years (range: 22-53) for TCHP and 42.5 (range: 23-52) for KP. TRA was observed in 55% (50/91) of pts. treated with TCHP compared to 30% (28/92) treated with KP (OR=2.79; 95% CI 1.52-5.12). In pts. with HR-positive EBC, TRA occurred in 62% with TCHP vs 35% for KP (OR=2.998; 95% CI 1.44-6.25). In those with HR-negative EBC, TRA was observed in 42% with TCHP vs. 21% with KP (OR=2.77; 95% CI 0.88-8.72). In the KP arm, TRA was observed in 38% (8/21) of pts. treated with standard adjuvant CT vs. 28% (20/71) of those that did not (OR 1.57; 95% CI 0.57-4.36). For women age ≤ 40, the rate of TRA was 38% with TCHP vs. 17% with KP (OR=3.00; 95% CI 1.05-8.60). For those > 40 years, TRA was observed in 74% treated with TCHP vs. 39% of those with KP (OR=4.50; 95% CI 1.88-10.73). Conclusion: The rate of TRA with standard TCHP is nearly double that observed with KP, suggesting that targeted CT with an antibody-drug conjugate regimen is associated with less gonadal toxicity. Rates of TRA are higher in women over the age of 40 for each treatment arm however KP is associated with lower rate of TRA in each age group. Association of TRA with efficacy outcomes (pCR, iDFS) will be presented. Citation Format: Sara A Hurvitz, Rodrigo Fresco, Karen Afenjar, Daniil Stroyakovskiy, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Hans Wildiers, Kyung Hae Jung, Jean-François Boileau, Mario Campone, Miguel Martín, Vicente Valero, Joseph A. Sparano, W. Fraser Symmans, Peter A. Fasching, Alastair M. Thompson, Nadia Harbeck, Vanesa López-Valverde, Chunyan Song, Thomas Boulet, Eleonora Restuccia, Dennis J. Slamon. Treatment-related amenorrhea with T-DM1 plus pertuzumab (KP) is lower than with docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (TCHP) in the phase III neoadjuvant KRISTINE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD12-06.

TP53 mutations are implicated in the progression of mucinous borderline tumors (MBOT) to mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOC). Optimized immunohistochemistry (IHC) for TP53 has been established as a proxy for the TP53 mutation status in other ovarian tumor types. We aimed to confirm the ability of TP53 IHC to predict TP53 mutation status in ovarian mucinous tumors and to evaluate the association of TP53 mutation status with survival among patients with MBOT and MOC. Tumor tissue from an initial cohort of 113 women with MBOT/MOC was stained with optimized IHC for TP53 using tissue microarrays (75.2%) or full sections (24.8%) and interpreted using established criteria as normal or abnormal (overexpression, complete absence, or cytoplasmic). Cases were considered concordant if abnormal IHC staining predicted deleterious TP53 mutations. Discordant tissue microarray cases were re-evaluated on full sections and interpretational criteria were refined. The initial cohort was expanded to a total of 165 MBOT and 424 MOC for the examination of the association of survival with TP53 mutation status, assessed either by TP53 IHC and/or sequencing. Initially, 82/113 (72.6%) cases were concordant using the established criteria. Refined criteria for overexpression to account for intratumoral heterogeneity and terminal differentiation improved concordance to 93.8% (106/113). In the expanded cohort, 19.4% (32/165) of MBOT showed evidence for TP53 mutation and this was associated with a higher risk of recurrence, disease-specific death, and all-cause mortality (overall survival: HR = 4.6, 95% CI 1.5-14.3, p = 0.0087). Within MOC, 61.1% (259/424) harbored a TP53 mutation, but this was not associated with survival (overall survival, p = 0.77). TP53 IHC is an accurate proxy for TP53 mutation status with refined interpretation criteria accounting for intratumoral heterogeneity and terminal differentiation in ovarian mucinous tumors. TP53 mutation status is an important biomarker to identify MBOT with a higher risk of mortality.

Purpose In the MONALEESA-3 Phase III trial of patients with hormone receptor–positive human epidermal growth factor receptor–negative advanced breast cancer, ribociclib plus fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Here, we present patient-reported outcomes from the trial, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Methods Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive ribociclib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. Time to definitive 10% deterioration (TTD) from baseline in HRQOL (global health status [GHS] from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire) and pain (BPI-SF questionnaire) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates; a stratified Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs. Results Deterioration ≥10% in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 GHS was observed in 33% of patients in the ribociclib group vs 34% of patients in the placebo (reference) group (HR for TTD ≥ 10% = 0.81 [95% CI, 0.62–1.1]). Similar findings were noted for TTD ≥5% (HR = 0.79 [95% CI, 0.61–1.0]) and TTD ≥15% (HR = 0.81 [95% CI, 0.60–1.08]). TTD ≥10% in emotional functioning (HR = 0.76 [95% CI, 0.57–1.01]) trended in favor of the ribociclib group, whereas results for fatigue and pain were similar between arms. TTD ≥10% in BPI-SF pain severity index score (HR = 0.77 [95% CI, 0.57–1.05]) and worst pain item score (HR = 0.81 [95% CI, 0.58–1.12]) trended in favor of ribociclib vs placebo. Conclusions In addition to significantly prolonging PFS and OS compared with placebo plus fulvestrant, adding ribociclib to fulvestrant maintains HRQOL., Highlights • Ribociclib + fulvestrant allowed maintenance of global health status (GHS). • Time to deterioration (TTD) by 10% can convey duration until worsening of QOL. • TTD ≥10% was delayed with ribociclib in GHS and emotional functioning. • Ribociclib also demonstrated trends toward delayed TTD vs placebo in pain outcomes.

Substances with good effectiveness that intervene in specific signalling pathways have been used increasingly in recent years in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer, and new therapies and approaches have now been added, which actually relate to quite specific changes, such as the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2 tumours with a PIK3CA mutation. The treatment of patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation has also been improved by the introduction of PARP inhibitors. Attempts are now being made increasingly to extend treatment indications based on molecular patterns, to identify other patients who could benefit from a treatment and to integrate the newly established treatment methods in existing therapy sequences. This review articles summarises the latest information in this connection.

The treatment of patients with early breast cancer has always been characterised by escalation by new therapies and de-escalation through identification of better treatment regimens or introduction of better tools to estimate prognosis. Efforts in some of these areas in the last few years have led to solid data. The results of the large studies of de-escalation through use of multi-gene tests are available, as are the results of some studies that investigated the new anti-HER2 substances T-DM1 and pertuzumab in the early treatment situation. Several large-scale studies examining the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors will soon be concluded so innovations can be anticipated in this area also. This review article will summarise and classify the results of the latest publications.

Purpose: Gene expression–based molecular subtypes of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSOC), demonstrated across multiple studies, may provide improved stratification for molecularly targeted trials. However, evaluation of clinical utility has been hindered by nonstandardized methods, which are not applicable in a clinical setting. We sought to generate a clinical grade minimal gene set assay for classification of individual tumor specimens into HGSOC subtypes and confirm previously reported subtype-associated features. Experimental Design: Adopting two independent approaches, we derived and internally validated algorithms for subtype prediction using published gene expression data from 1,650 tumors. We applied resulting models to NanoString data on 3,829 HGSOCs from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We further developed, confirmed, and validated a reduced, minimal gene set predictor, with methods suitable for a single-patient setting. Results: Gene expression data were used to derive the predictor of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma molecular subtype (PrOTYPE) assay. We established a de facto standard as a consensus of two parallel approaches. PrOTYPE subtypes are significantly associated with age, stage, residual disease, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and outcome. The locked-down clinical grade PrOTYPE test includes a model with 55 genes that predicted gene expression subtype with >95% accuracy that was maintained in all analytic and biological validations. Conclusions: We validated the PrOTYPE assay following the Institute of Medicine guidelines for the development of omics-based tests. This fully defined and locked-down clinical grade assay will enable trial design with molecular subtype stratification and allow for objective assessment of the predictive value of HGSOC molecular subtypes in precision medicine applications. See related commentary by McMullen et al., p. 5271

Background: Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a common efficacy endpoint in neoadjuvant therapy trials for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Previous studies have shown that pCR is strongly associated with improved long-term survival outcomes, including event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). However, the trial-level associations between treatment effect on pCR and long-term survival outcomes are not well established. This study sought to evaluate these associations by incorporating more recent clinical trials in TNBC. Methods: A literature review identified published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neoadjuvant therapy for TNBC that reported results for both pCR and EFS/OS. Meta-regression models were performed to evaluate the association of treatment effect on pCR and EFS/OS. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of divergent study designs. Results: Ten comparisons from 8 RCTs (N=2,478 patients) were identified from the literature review. The log (odds ratio) of pCR was a significant predictor of the log (hazard ratio) of EFS (P=.003), with a coefficient of determination of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.41–0.95). There was a weaker association between pCR and OS (P=.18), with a coefficient of determination of 0.24 (95% CI, 0.01–0.77). Consistent results were found in the exploratory analysis and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: This is the first study that has shown a trial-level association between pCR and survival outcomes in TNBC. By incorporating the most up-to-date RCTs, this study showed a significant trial-level association between pCR and EFS. A positive association between pCR and OS was also recorded.

Purpose:To determine if the degree of estrogen suppression with aromatase inhibitors (AI: anastrozole, exemestane, letrozole) is associated with efficacy in early-stage breast cancer, and to examine for differences in the mechanism of action between the three AIs.Experimental Design:Matched case–control studies [247 matched sets from MA.27 (anastrozole vs. exemestane) and PreFace (letrozole) trials] were undertaken to assess whether estrone (E1) or estradiol (E2) concentrations after 6 months of adjuvant therapy were associated with risk of an early breast cancer event (EBCE). Preclinical laboratory studies included luciferase activity, cell proliferation, radio-labeled ligand estrogen receptor binding, surface plasmon resonance ligand receptor binding, and nuclear magnetic resonance assays.Results:Women with E1 ≥1.3 pg/mL and E2 ≥0.5 pg/mL after 6 months of AI treatment had a 2.2-fold increase in risk (P = 0.0005) of an EBCE, and in the anastrozole subgroup, the increase in risk of an EBCE was 3.0-fold (P = 0.001). Preclinical laboratory studies examined mechanisms of action in addition to aromatase inhibition and showed that only anastrozole could directly bind to estrogen receptor α (ERα), activate estrogen response element-dependent transcription, and stimulate growth of an aromatase-deficient CYP19A1−/− T47D breast cancer cell line.Conclusions:This matched case–control clinical study revealed that levels of estrone and estradiol above identified thresholds after 6 months of adjuvant anastrozole treatment were associated with increased risk of an EBCE. Preclinical laboratory studies revealed that anastrozole, but not exemestane or letrozole, is a ligand for ERα. These findings represent potential steps towards individualized anastrozole therapy.

The Advanced Breast Cancer Fifth International Consensus Conference (ABC5) which focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of advanced breast cancer was held in Lisbon on November 14 – 16, 2019. The aim of the conference is to standardize the treatment of advanced breast cancer worldwide using evidence-based data and to ensure that patients with advanced breast disease anywhere in the world are treated appropriately and have access to the latest therapies. This year, the emphasis was on new developments and study results from patients with advanced breast cancer as well as precision medicine. The collaboration with patient advocates from all over the globe is also an important goal of the ABC Conference, which is why the international ABC panel also included a number of patient advocates. We present a commentary on the voting results of the ABC5 panelists in Lisbon by a working group of German breast cancer specialists together with the implications for routine clinical care in Germany. The commentary is based on the recommendations of the Breast Commission of the German Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO). This commentary is useful, it includes country-specific features for the ABC consensus.

Die individuellen Therapiemoglichkeiten der Patientin mit einem metastasierten Brustkrebs werden immer spezifischer. Fur Therapieentscheidungen in der metastasierten Situation liegt keine ausreichende Evidenz aus klinischen Studien fur alle Behandlungssituationen und Subgruppen vor. Dieses macht die Erhebung und systematische Auswertung von Real-World-Daten zur Erstellung von Real-World-Evidenz sinnvoll. Um bei der Behandlung von Patientinnen mit einem metastasierten Mammakarzinom eine stadien- und tumorspezifische Therapie identifizieren zu konnen, wurde das PRAEGNANT-Netzwerk (Prospective Academic Translational Research Network zur Optimierung der onkologischen Versorgungsqualitat im fortgeschrittenen therapeutischen Umfeld) etabliert. Ziel ist es, die medizinische Versorgung von Patientinnen mit metastasiertem Mammakarzinom in der realen Welt zu beleuchten, Wirkungen und Nebenwirkungen der Therapiekonzepte zu erfassen, die Veranderung der Lebensqualitat unter der Therapie mit zu verfolgen, Patientinnen zu identifizieren, die an einer klinischen Arzneimittelstudie teilnehmen konnen, und durch Untersuchung der molekularen Tumoreigenschaften des Mammakarzinoms Patientinnen eine zielgerichtete Therapie in klinischen Studien zu ermoglichen. Dieser Artikel fasst die bereits erhobenen Daten aus dem PRAEGNANT-Netzwerk zusammen und beleuchtet die Frage der Ubertragbarkeit der verschiedenen Endpunkte aus klinischen Studien in die reale Behandlungssituation.

Purpose Second opinions in oncology are becoming increasingly important in an era of more complex treatments and a growing demand for information by patients. Therefore, we analyzed their effects and influencing factors like patients’ motives, subjective extent of information and satisfaction with communications. Methods This prospective study evaluated second opinions for patients with breast cancer or gynecological malignancy. The patients received a questionnaire before and two months after, which inquired expectations, reasons, and satisfaction with the second opinion and the attending physicians. Results A total of 164 patients were included and the majority had breast cancer (75.0%). Receiving the second opinion made 89.7% feel better informed, their need for information decreased (from 75.3% to 39.2%, P P = 0.0002). There were various reasons for requesting a second opinion, e.g., the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis, hope for change in the treatment recommendation or dissatisfaction with the initial physicians. Conclusions Second opinions can lead to significantly greater patient satisfaction, meeting the need for information and leading to better management of patients in the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis. Doctor–patient communications play a key role.

ZusammenfassungIm Rahmen von derzeit laufenden Studien werden in naher Zukunft wichtige translationale Fragestellungen von klinischer Relevanz geklärt werden. Zum einen muss die Rolle der PD‑L1-Expression, nachdem sie für die Indikationsstellung für Atezolizumab in der 1. Therapielinie bei Patientinnen mit einem metastasierten triplenegativen Mammakarzinom (TNBC) von Relevanz ist, weiter geklärt werden. In einer neoadjuvanten Studie beim TNBC mit Pembrolizumab konnte kein Zusammenhang zwischen Wirksamkeit und PD‑L1-Expression gefunden werden. Sowohl mit als auch ohne Expression war die pCR höher, wenn Pembrolizumab zur Chemotherapie hinzugefügt wurde. Des Weiteren wird für die bei Keimbahnmutation von BRCA1/2 zugelassenen PARP-Inhibitoren nach weiteren Patientengruppen gesucht, in denen eine Wirksamkeit besteht. Dieses sind z. B. Patientinnen mit Mutationen in anderen Genen, die an der homologen Rekombination beteiligt sind, oder Patientinnen mit Tumoren, die bei globalen Tests zu homologen Rekombinationsdefizienzen (HRDTests) eine Auffälligkeit zeigen. Auch die Frage, ob und mit welchen Chemotherapie-Kombinationspartnern eine PARP-Inhibition zusammen gegeben werden kann, wird derzeit sowohl beim Mamma- als auch beim Ovarialkarzinom untersucht. Während sich die Daten zum verbesserten Gesamtüberleben bei den CDK4/6-Inhibitoren konsolidieren, wächst auch das Wissen um molekulare Veränderungen unter der Therapie und bei der Progression unter der Therapie. Sowohl die Anhäufung von PI3K-Mutationen als auch PTEN-Veränderungen könnten bei der Planung von Folgetherapien eine Rolle spielen. Diese Übersichtsarbeit fasst diese aktuellen Entwicklungen beim Mammakarzinom und teilweise auch beim Ovarialkarzinom zusammen.

Purpose In many diseases, it is possible to classify a heterogeneous group into subgroups relative to tumor biology, genetic variations, or clinical and pathological features. No such classification is available for endometriosis. In our retrospective case–case analysis we defined subgroups of endometriosis patients relative to the type and location of the endometriosis lesion and relative to basic patient characteristics. Methods From June 2013 to July 2017, a total of 1576 patients with endometriosis diagnosed at surgery were included in this study. The patients’ history and clinical data were documented using a web-based remote data entry system. To build subgroups, all possible combinations of endometriosis locations/types (peritoneal; ovarian endometriosis; deeply infiltrating endometriosis; adenomyosis) were used. Due to the variation in group sizes, they were combined into five substantial larger groups. Results Age, pregnancy rate, and live birth rate were identified as characteristics that significantly differed between the five patient groups that were defined. No significant differences were noted in relation to body mass index, length of menstrual cycle, age at menarche, reason for presentation, or educational level. Conclusion This study describes basic patient characteristics in relation to common clinical subgroups in a large clinical cohort of endometriosis patients. Epidemiological information about different clinical groups may be helpful in identifying groups with specific clinical courses, potentially suggesting novel approaches to early detection and to surgical and systemic treatment.

Funder: Funding details are provided in the Supplementary Material, Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have the potential to improve risk stratification. Joint estimation of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) effects in models could improve predictive performance over standard approaches of PRS construction. Here, we implemented computationally-efficient, penalized, logistic regression models (lasso, elastic net, stepwise) to individual level genotype data and a Bayesian framework with continuous shrinkage, ���select and shrink for summary statistics��� (S4), to summary level data for epithelial non-mucinous ovarian cancer risk prediction. We developed the models in a dataset consisting of 23,564 non-mucinous EOC cases and 40,138 controls participating in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) and validated the best models in three populations of different ancestries: prospective data from 198,101 women of European ancestry; 7,669 women of East Asian ancestry; 1,072 women of African ancestry, and in 18,915 BRCA1 and 12,337 BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestry. In the external validation data, the model with the strongest association for non-mucinous EOC risk derived from the OCAC model development data was the S4 model (27,240 SNPs) with odds ratios (OR) of 1.38(95%CI:1.28���1.48,AUC:0.588) per unit standard deviation, in women of European ancestry; 1.14(95%CI:1.08���1.19,AUC:0.538) in women of East Asian ancestry; 1.38(95%CI:1.21-1.58,AUC:0.593) in women of African ancestry; hazard ratios of 1.37(95%CI:1.30���1.44,AUC:0.592) in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 1.51(95%CI:1.36-1.67,AUC:0.624) in BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Incorporation of the S4 PRS in risk prediction models for ovarian cancer may have clinical utility in ovarian cancer prevention programs.

It has been over three decades since anthracyclines took their place as the standard chemotherapy backbone for breast cancer in the curative setting. Though the efficacy of anthracycline chemotherapy is not debatable, potentially life-threatening and long-term risks accompany this class of agents, leading some to question their widespread use, especially when newer agents with improved therapeutic indices have become available. Critically assessing when to incorporate an anthracycline is made more relevant in an era where molecular classification is enabling not only the development of biologically targeted therapeutics but also is improving the ability to better select those who would benefit from cytotoxic agents. This comprehensive analysis will present the problem of overtreatment in early-stage breast cancer, review evidence supporting the use of anthracyclines in the pre-taxane era, analyze comparative trials evaluating taxanes with or without anthracyclines in biologically unselected and selected patient populations, and explore published work aimed at defining anthracycline-sensitive tumor types.

Tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) are highly proliferative neoplasms that generally respond well to platinum/taxane chemotherapy. We recently identified minichromosome maintenance complex component 3 (MCM3), which is involved in the initiation of DNA replication and proliferation, as a favorable prognostic marker in HGSC. Our objective was to further validate whether MCM3 mRNA expression and possibly MCM3 protein levels are associated with survival in patients with HGSC. MCM3 mRNA expression was measured using NanoString expression profiling on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue (N = 2355 HGSC) and MCM3 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (N = 522 HGSC) and compared with Ki-67. Kaplan–Meier curves and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate associations with survival. Among chemotherapy-naïve HGSC, higher MCM3 mRNA expression (one standard deviation increase in the score) was associated with longer overall survival (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.81–0.92, p < 0.0001, N = 1840) in multivariable analysis. MCM3 mRNA expression was highest in the HGSC C5.PRO molecular subtype, although no interaction was observed between MCM3, survival and molecular subtypes. MCM3 and Ki-67 protein levels were significantly lower after exposure to neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy-naïve tumors: 37.0% versus 46.4% and 22.9% versus 34.2%, respectively. Among chemotherapy-naïve HGSC, high MCM3 protein levels were also associated with significantly longer disease-specific survival (HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.36–0.74, p = 0.0003, N = 392) compared to cases with low MCM3 protein levels in multivariable analysis. MCM3 immunohistochemistry is a promising surrogate marker of proliferation in HGSC.

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki-67, and HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) together with HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) are utilized to classify invasive breast cancer (IBC) into predictive molecular subtypes. As IHC evaluation may be hampered by analytical errors, gene expression assays could offer a reliable alternative. In this first Europe-wide external quality assessment (EQA) study, we investigated performance of mRNA-based Xpert® Breast Cancer STRAT4 (CE-IVD) in five European laboratories. The cohort comprised ten pre-therapy IBC core biopsies diagnosed in the coordinating center (CC). STRAT4 binary (positive or negative) mRNA results of each marker (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2,&nbsp, MKI67) were compared with the gold standard IHC/ISH performed by the CC. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ESR1 and ERBB2 mRNA were 100% for all samples. In contrast, PGR expression was falsely negative for one case by two sites and MKI67 falsely negative for two cases (respectively by four and one sites). These cases had STRAT4 expression values close to assay cut-offs and immunohistochemically presented heterogeneous low positive PgR and heterogeneous Ki-67. Our EQA shows that STRAT4 mRNA assay may be a reproducible method to evaluate ER, PgR, HER2, and Ki-67 status. However, cases with expression values close to assay cut-offs should be carefully reviewed.

Background Previous trials showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile associated with pembrolizumab in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer. Whether ...

Background: Biomarkers are needed to prognosticate and predict efficacy of therapy for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-negative breast cancer (BC). Caveolin genes (CAV1, CAV2) are responsible for formation of caveolae, which are 50-100 nM membrane invaginations implicated in endocytosis and transcytosis of nutrients and substances, including albumin. Overexpression of caveolin family genes has been implicated in driving BC progression, but also in predicting response to nab-paclitaxel. We hypothesized that high CAV1/2 expression would correlate with poor clinical outcomes, but that patients with high CAV1/2 expression would have better outcomes with nab-paclitaxel based chemotherapy. Methods: We correlated tumor CAV1/2 RNA expression from available RNA-Seq data with pathologic complete response (pCR) and clinical outcomes (disease-free survival, DFS, and overall survival, OS) in the GeparSepto (G7) clinical trial, which randomized patients with early stage BC to preoperative paclitaxel versus nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy regimens. CAV1/2 log-transformed values were analyzed as a continuous variable and dichotomized about the mean for each gene. Multivariable logistic regression models were generated, and included age, T-stage, N-stage, tumor grade (G3 vs G1-2), Ki67 (continuous), and histology (non-ductal versus ductal). Results: There was RNA-Seq expression data available for 279 out of 810 HER2-negative patients, of whom 26.5% were hormone receptor (HR)-negative (triple negative). CAV1 and CAV2 expression values were directly correlated with each other (Pearson coefficient 0.452). There was no difference in CAV1 expression between HR-negative and HR-positive patients, but there was significant up-regulation of CAV2 expression (mean) in HR-negative patients (p=0.003). With regards to pCR, high CAV1/2 expression was associated with a strong benefit from nab-paclitaxel compared to paclitaxel (OR(CAV1)=4.92 (1.70-14.22) and OR(CAV2)=5.39 (1.76-16.47)) in contrast to low CAV1/2 expression (OR(CAV1)=0.94 (0.38-2.34) and OR(CAV2)=0.95 (0.39-2.29)) in multivariate modeling (tests for interaction p=0.023 and p=0.019). For CAV1 this effect continued beyond pCR with regards to survival: high CAV1 expression was associated with superior survival in the nab-paclitaxel arm (HR(DFS)=0.53 (0.27-1.05), HR(OS)=0.29 (0.11-0.77)) but not low CAV1 expression (HR(DFS)=1.37 (0.62-3.04), HR(OS)=2.47 (0.78-7.80)) in multivariate modeling (test for interaction p=0.077 (DFS) and p=0.005 (OS)). No significant interactions in hazard ratios for DFS and OS were detected for CAV2. With regard to prognostic effects, CAV2 expression was significantly associated with worse DFS and OS for all patients. In particular, high CAV2 expression was associated with poor prognosis for HR-negative patients in multivariate modeling (OR(DFS)=4.40 (1.44-13.46), OR(OS)=9.38 (1.13-77.75)), but not for HR-positive patients (OR(DFS)=1.60 (0.84-3.05), OR(OS)=2.05 (0.92-4.58)) (test for interaction p=0.125 and p=0.186). Conclusions: Higher CAV2 expression is associated with worse DFS and OS, in particular for HR-negative patients, confirming potential prognostic roles for CAV1/2. No significant differences in DFS and OS based on CAV1/2 expression were noted for patients who received nab-paclitaxel based treatment, but the odds of obtaining pCR were improved for patients with high CAV1/2 expression. Taken together, these findings suggest that CAV1/2 expression may offset the negative prognostic factor associated with higher CAV1/2 expression in patients treated with nab-paclitaxel regimens by enhancing the efficacy of treatment, perhaps through increased nab-paclitaxel endocytosis/transcytosis. Citation Format: Terence Williams, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christian Jackisch, Changxian Shen, Karsten Weber, Peter Fasching, Carsten Denkert, Jenny Furlanetto, Ernst Heinmoller, Sabine Schmatloch, Thomas Karn, Christopher Szeto, Marion van Mackelenbergh, Valentina Nekljudova, Elmar Stickeler, Patrick Soon-Shiong, Christian Schem, Barbara Fleige, Volkmar Muller, Frederik Marme, Michael Untch, Sibylle Loibl. Caveolin gene expression predicts for response and clinical outcomes of patients treated with preoperative paclitaxel-based chemotherapy regimens in early stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-01.

Background: BRCA1/2 genes play a central role in DNA repair. Therefore, pts harboring gBRCA1/2m treated with chemotherapy might be at higher risk of acute hematological toxicities due to the lower level of functional BRCA1/2 protein potentially resulting in more toxicity. Published results are discordant, further data are needed. Methods: Pts with early TNBC and known gBRCA1/2m treated with anthracycline-taxane based NACT in the GeparQuinto (n=487), GeparSixto (n=291) and GeparOcto (n=393) studies were included. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis was foreseen only for the iddETC arm in GeparOcto. Primary objective was the rate of neutropenia grade (G)3-4 after cycle 1; secondary objectives were the rate of other hematological toxicities G3-4 and the overall toxicity rate after cycle 1 as well as hematological toxicities in gBRCA1/2 pts during the taxane part of chemotherapy. Results: 209/1171 evaluated pts (17.8%) had a gBRCA1/2m (177 gBRCA1m, 33 gBRCA2m). Median age was 48yrs [21-78]. The rate of neutropenia G3-4 after cycle 1 in gBRCA1/2 wildtype (wt) pts was 35.7% vs 37.4% in gBRCA1/2m (p=0.683), 35.9% in gBRCA1m (p=1.000), 44.8% in gBRCA2m (p=0.330). gBRCA1/2 mutational status did not predict neutropenia G3-4 at univariate (OR=1.08, 95%CI 0.78-1.48 p=0.658) or multivariate analysis adjusted for age, BMI and treatment (OR=1.26, 95%CI 0.87-1.82 p=0.226). The overall rate and the rates of other hematological toxicities are shown in the table. gBRCA1/2 mutational status did also not predict for any other hematological toxicities G3-4 (univariate OR=0.94, 95%CI 0.64-1.40 p=0.773; multivariate OR=0.94, 95%CI 0.62-1.43 p=0.779). gBRCA1/2 mutational status predicted for hematological toxicities G3-4 under taxane treatment (univariate OR=1.94, 95%CI 1.35-2.77 p During taxane treatment, the overall rate of hematological toxicities G3-4 in wt pts was 43.1% (n=270) vs 59.5% (n=91) in gBRCA1/2m, p Conclusions: Overall, gBRCA1/2 mutation is not associated with a significantly higher risk of severe hematological toxicities. Under taxane therapy, pts with gBRCA1/2 demonstrate a higher rate of hematological toxicities G3-4, especially neutropenia, compared to wildtype pts, and should therefore be carefully monitored. Hematological toxicities after cycle 1wildtypegBRCA1/2mp-valuegBRCA1mp-valuegBRCA2mp-valueN%N%N%N%neutropenia G3-432635.77437.40.6836135.91.0001344.80.330febrile neutropenia171.831.41.00010.60.33726.10.130leucopenia G3-424425.83818.20.0212815.80.0041030.30.548anemia G3-420.200.01.00000.01.00000.01.000thrombopenia G3-4111.210.50.70510.60.70400.01.000any hematological toxicities G1-477782.617081.70.76314180.10.4533090.90.344any hematological toxicities G3-442846.38843.60.5337241.90.3171651.60.587 Citation Format: Jenny Furlanetto, Volker Möbus, Andreas Schneeweiss, Kerstin Rhiem, Hans Tesch, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Kristina Lübbe, Michael Untch, Christoph Salat, Jens Huober, Peter Klare, Rita Schmutzler, Fergus J Couch, Bianca Lederer, Bernd Gerber, Dirk-Michael Zahm, Ingo Bauerfeind, Valentina Nekljudova, Claus Hanusch, Christian Jackisch, Theresa Link, Sibylle Loibl, Peter A Fasching. Germline (g)BRCA1/2 mutations (m) and hematological toxicities in patients (pts) with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-03.

Background: Tumor immune markers such as tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) or expression-based profiles have been correlated with both response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis in early breast cancer (BC) patients. Some chemotherapies, such as paclitaxel, lead to the development of TILs and in some cases, suppression of regulatory T-cells. Therefore, assessment of the tumor microenvironment (TME) could provide important information for clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to test if RNAseq-based TME classification of BC tumors is predictive of pathological complete Response (pCR) and prognosis in the neoadjuvant GeparSepto (G7) trial (NCT01583426). Methods: We performed a retrospective-prospective analysis of a subset of 810 subjects of the total of 1207 patients of the G7 trial. In G7 HER2-negative early high-risk BC patients were studied to determine if nab-paclitaxel is superior to solvent-based paclitaxel. In addition to the taxane paclitaxel, both treatment arms received epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide before surgery. For this analysis, a subset of 279 HER2 negative patients with sufficient quality of pretherapeutic core biopsies to perform whole-transcriptome RNAseq (~200x106 reads per tumor) was used. Based on RNAseq data, immune activity classification was provided by ImmunityBio (Culver City, CA) by comparison of expression of 23 immune-cell-specific gene signatures as described by Bindea et al. (Immunity, 2013) to those from a reference population of 1467 similarly-profiled unselected tumor samples from a large tumor database (NantOmics, Culver City, CA). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of inferred immune activities revealed 3 distinct groups termed “hot”, “warm”, and “cold” clusters. Logistic regression analysis based on age, trial arm, tumor size, nodal status, Ki-67, hormone-receptor (HR) status and immune activity cluster (hot/warm vs. cold) as independent variables was performed to predict pCR (ypT0/ypN0). Cox regression analysis with the same covariates was also performed to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 279 patients, 67 had a pCR (24%). The analyzed subset was similar to the main HER2 negative population (pCR-rate: 22%). Patients with a “hot/warm” or “cold” immune activity assessment had a pCR in 30% and 13% of the cases, respectively. The odds-ratio of the multivariate logistic regression analysis was 2.17 (95% CI: 1.00-4.71, p=0.0512). With regard to DFS and OS, T follicular helper cell B-cell, and T-cell signatures seemed to play a prominent role, and the hazard ratios (also “hot/warm” vs. “cold”) for the multivariate analyses were 0.38 (95% CI: 0.21-0.66; p=0.0007) and 0.34 (95%CI: 0.16-0.72, p= 0.0045), respectively. Within the 23 individual immune-cell-specific gene signatures, CD56dimNatural Killer (NK), type 1 helper T-cells, and CD8+ T-cell signatures seemed to be closely associated with achievement of a pCR. RNAseq-based deconvolution of immune-cell activity was corroborated by IHC-based TIL scoring. Immune-hot/warm patients had more intratumoral lymphocytes compared to cold tumors (mean: 11.6% vs. 4.9%, p Citation Format: Peter A Fasching, Carsten Denkert, Stephen Benz, Karsten E Weber, Christopher Szeto, Jan Budczies, Andreas Schneeweiss, Elmar Stickeler, Sabine Schmatloch, Christian Jackisch, Thomas Karn, Hans Peter Sinn, Mathias Warm, Marion van Mackelenbergh, Sharooz Rabizadeh, Christian Schem, Ernst Heinmöller, Volkmar Müller, Frederik Marmé, Patrick Soon-Shiong, Valentina Nekljudova, Michael Untch, Sibylle Loibl. Tumor immune-cell activity assessed by RNAseq is an independent predictor of therapy response and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 negative breast cancer patients - An analysis of the GeparSepto trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-08.

Background: Efficacy and quality of life (QoL) are key factors when selecting therapies for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. The addition of targeted oral agents such as CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy is the new standard for hormone receptor (HR)+ HER2- MBC and substantially prolongs progression-free survival. However more complex oral medication in oncology might require substantial improvement of patient management. Despite several advantages of an oral treatment, patients become increasingly self-responsible and physician/patient contact is reduced. Adherence, maintaining patients’ satisfaction, and early detection and management of side effects become important challenges and new ways of continuous support for oncological patients are needed. An eHealth-based platform could help to support therapy management and physician-patient interaction. Methods: PRECYCLE is a multicenter, randomized, phase IV trial in HR+ HER2- MBC. All patients (n = 960) receive the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib either in first (62.5%) or later line (37.5%) together with endocrine therapy (AI, fulvestrant) according to national guidelines. Primary study aim is the time to deterioration (TTD) of QoL in patients supported by two eHealth systems with substantially different functionality. To date (05/07/2019), 250 patients have been registered in all 72 participating centers and 230 randomized to the different study arms: - CANKADO inform with only a CANKADO-based eHealth service with a personal login, documentation of daily drug intake and passive text information (disease, treatment), but no further functions. vs. - CANKADO active with the fully functional CANKADO-based eHealth treatment support system (+ drug diary, QoL, AEs, automated recommendations, etc.) To evaluate QoL, the FACT-B questionnaire is completed at every visit. Primary objective is to test the hypothesis of superiority for TTD with regards to QoL (FACT-G scale) in patients supported by an eHealth therapy management system (CANKADO active) versus in those merely receiving eHealth-based information (CANKADO inform). As little is known about relationships between behavioral patterns (e.g. adherence), genetic background, and drug efficacy. The trial also includes a large translational program that aims at the discovery and validation of biomarkers concerning efficacy, toxicity, adherence and QoL. Recruitment is ongoing. Citation Format: Tom Degenhardt, Peter Fasching, Diana Luftner, Volkmar Mueller, Christoph Thomssen, Christian Schem, Isabel Witzel, Thomas Decker, Hans Tesch, Sherko Kuemmel, Christoph Uleer, Rachel Wuerstlein, Christoph Riese, Timo Schinköthe, Ronald Kates, Johannes Schumacher, Nadia Harbeck, Marcus Schmidt. Impact of CANKADO-based eHealth-support on quality of life in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy - Precycle [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-14-02.

Background: Adagloxad simolenin (AS) is an investigational immune stimulant comprising the Globo H hexasaccharide epitope linked to the carrier protein keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). KLH facilitates a more vigorous immune response given the weak antigen, Globo H. Furthermore, AS is co-administered with the potent saponin-based adjuvant OBI-821 to induce a humoral response. A phase 2 trial examining the correlation between Globo H expression and clinical outcomes showed that patients with metastatic breast cancer whose tumors had an H-score of ≥15 (validated immunohistochemical [IHC] assay to determine Globo H expression; range 0-300) treated with AS/OBI-821 had a trend for superior progression-free survival vs placebo. As previously reported, Globo H is expressed similarly among both hormone receptor-positive and triple-negative breast cancer tumor subtypes. In an effort to improve outcomes in TNBC, we are conducting a randomized phase 3 trial in this high-risk population. Study Aim: The primary objective is to determine the effect of AS/OBI-821 on invasive disease recurrence and disease-free survival in patients with TNBC at high risk for recurrence. Secondary objectives are to determine the impact of AS/OBI-821 on overall survival, quality of life (QoL), breast cancer-free interval, distant disease recurrence and disease-free survival, safety, and tolerability. Methods. Eligible patients will have TNBC (estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor Patients will be followed every 26 weeks for disease recurrence during the follow-up period until a total of 187 endpoint events (either disease recurrence or death) are reached or the last patient has been followed for 3 years after randomization. Enrolled patients will undergo imaging (baseline, weeks 28, 52, 76, 104, 130, 156, 208, 260) and clinical examination every 3 months for 2 years and every 6 months thereafter. QOL will be assessed (weeks 1, 28, 52, 76, 104, 130, 156, 208, 260) using the EORTC QLQ-C30 plus additional EORTC QLQ-BR23 for breast cancer and European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Levels questionnaire. Adverse events will be graded/recorded by investigators as per National Cancer Institute CTCAE v5.0. Blood/tumor tissue samples will be collected for exploratory assessments during/after end of trial. Present and target accrual: Approximately 110 study centers across Europe, North America, and Asia-Pacific will enroll an estimated 668 patients. Patients will be treated for up to 2 years and followed until occurrence of 187 events (invasive disease recurrence or death) or 3 years from last patient randomized. Survival follow-up is for 5 years from randomization of last patient. Citation Format: Hope S Rugo, Louis WC Chow, Javier Cortes, Peter A Fasching, Binghe Xu, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Sung-Bae Kim, Yen-Shen Lu, Rita Nanda, Priyanka Sharma, Richard B Schwab, Chen-En Tsai. Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adagloxad simolenin (OBI-822) and OBI-821 treatment in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at high risk for recurrence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-08-03.

Introduction: RIBECCA is a national, multi-center, open-label, single-arm phase IIIb trial assessing the efficacy and safety of ribociclib in combination with letrozole in a patient population similar to the populations of MONALEESA-2, -3 and -7. Here we present the results of the third preplanned interim analysis. Methods: Main inclusion criteria allowed enrollment of men or women with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer not amenable to curative treatment by surgery or radiotherapy, and histological or cytological confirmation of HR+, HER2- breast cancer, irrespective of their menopausal status. The primary objective is to assess the clinical benefit rate (CBR) after 6 months. Secondary objectives include: progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and changes in quality of life. Here we describe a preliminary analysis baseline characteristics, safety data and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 24 weeks, of all enrolled patients (n=502). Results: The cut-off date for this third interim analysis was 6 months after the last patient was enrolled in the study. The median observation time for all patients in this analysis was 9.4 months (0.1-26.0 months). Baseline characteristics: of 502 pts, 497 were female and 5 male. Median age: 64 yrs; 46 pts pre-or perimenopausal, 451 postmenopausal (missing: 5); ECOG 0-1: 96.8%; median time since first recurrence: 1.6 months; 71.1 % of pts had bone metastases (40.8% bone only), 30.1% liver, 28.1% lung and 30.1% other metastases. Median relative dose intensity was 0.90 for ribociclib and 1 for letrozole. The most common treatment emergent AEs (all grades) were neutropenia and/or neutrophil count decreased (57.8%), nausea (41.2%), fatigue (37.5%), alopecia (34.5%), leukopenia or WBC decreased (29.7%), nasopharyngitis (24.7%), diarrhea (23.5%), ALT increased (21.5%) and AST increased (19.7%). The CBR by week 24 was 69.2%. Conclusion: The results of the third interim analysis confirmed clinical benefit in this patient population. No new safety signals were detected. This is in line with data published from the pivotal phase III studies MONALEESA-2, MONALEESA-3 and MONALEESA-7. Citation Format: Andreas Hartkopf, Arnd Nusch, Thomas Decker, Mattea Reinisch, Bernhard J Heinrich, Christian Kurbacher, Roswitha Fuchs, Hans Tesch, Petra Krabisch, Sara Brucker, Tanja N Fehm, Wolfgang Janni, Sherko Kümmel, Diana Lüftner, Andreas Schneeweiss, Martin H Schuler, Claudia Voges, Jörg Schubert, Peter A Fasching. RIBECCA - A phase IIIb, multi-center, open label study for women with estrogen receptor positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with ribociclib (LEE011) in combination with letrozole: Results of the third interim analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-31.

Background: The collaborative DETECT study program represents a large program on metastatic breast cancer (MBC) worldwide. The main objective of the DETECT trial is to evaluate the efficacy of individualized breast cancer treatment based on the presence and phenotype setting of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Thus, the DETECT study program is one of the first clinical trials translating the role of CTC enumeration/phenotyping directly into treatment intervention within different breast cancer subtypes. Trial design: The DETECT-III trial is a multicenter, randomized, phase III study comparing standard therapy alone versus standard therapy plus lapatinib in patients with initially HER2-negative MBC and HER2-positive CTCs. Patients with HER2-negative MBC and only HER2-negative CTCs can be included within the DETECT-IV trial, a prospective, multicenter, open-label, phase II study including patients with HER2-negative MBC. Within the DETECT-IV study setting postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor positive MBC are treated with the CDK 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib and endocrine therapy, while women with triple negative MBC or a hormone-receptor positive tumor and indication for chemotherapy will receive eribulin. Specific aims: The DETECT study program offers various up-to-date treatment options, generating a wealth of clinical data including long-term follow-up data, evaluated in the controlled setting of a single large clinical trial program. The primary endpoint of the DETECT III trial is the comparison of efficacy as assessed using CTC clearance rate between patients receiving standard anticancer therapy with lapatinib and patients receiving standard anticancer therapy alone. The secondary objective of this trial is to assess the level of compliance to study procedures comparing the efficacy of lapatinib between given treatment groups. The primary objectives of the DETECT- IV trial are to evaluate CTC clearance rate for the ribociclib cohort and progression-free survival (defined as time interval from date of recruitment until progressive disease) for the eribulin cohort. The main focal point of the extensive collaborative translational oncology research projects is to apply innovative biomarkers and assays focusing on molecular characteristics of CTCs. This “biological status” of CTCs may provide new information about their potential function in terms of a repeatedly performed liquid biopsy to assess the patients’ response to therapy. Citation Format: Sabrina Krause, Thomas WP Friedl, Peter A Fasching, Andreas Schneeweiss, Volkmar Müller, Sabine Riethdorf, Klaus Pantel, Florin-Andrei Taran, Arkadius Polasik, Marie Tzschaschel, Amelie de Gregorio, Franziska Meier-Stiegen, Jens Huober, Wolfgang Janni, Tanja Fehm. Detect III/IV study trial - The multicenter study program in patients with HER2-negative MBC and circulating tumor cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-18-01.

Oncological second opinions are becoming increasingly important given more complex treatment strategies, simultaneously more patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), and many comprehensive cancer centers initiate integrative medicine programs. The present study focuses on analyzing the effects of a second opinion in relation to attitudes toward CAM.In this prospective study patients (n = 97) with a diagnosis of breast cancer or gynecological malignancies who had requested a second opinion received a questionnaire before and after the second opinion concerning their attitudes toward CAM.The majority of patients had breast cancer (72.2%, n = 70). Only 6.2% (n = 6) stated that they had been informed about CAM by the doctors who treated them first, 21.6% (n = 21) had received information about it when seeking the second opinion. After the first opinion, 42.3% (n = 41) wanted to try CAM, the same proportion trusted orthodox medicine alone. After the second opinion, 24 patients (24.7%) wanted to try CAM, while 38.1% (n = 37) relied exclusively on orthodox medicine. There was a significant correlation between an increased patients' need for information and interest in CAM (p = 0.02).Today, aspects of CAM still are very often no part of oncological first and second opinions. This might hence lead to discouraging patients to try out CAM and therefore integrative medicine programs in comprehensive cancer centers might be problem-solving.Hintergrund und Ziele: Im Zeitalter der komplexeren Krebstherapien gewinnt zum einen die onkologische Zweitmeinung zunehmend an Bedeutung, zum anderen nutzen immer mehr Patientinnen komplementäre und alternativmedizinische Verfahren und in vielen zertifizierten Onkologischen Zentren entstehen Sprechstunden für Komplementär- und Alternativmedizin. Eine Ana­lyse der Effekte einer onkologischen Zweitmeinung in Bezug auf die Einstellung zur Komplementär- und Alternativmedizin war somit Fokus der vorliegenden Studie. Patientinnen und Methoden: In der prospektiven Untersuchung wurden onkologische Zweitmeinungen evalu­iert. Patientinnen (n = 97) mit der Diagnose eines Mammakarzinoms oder eines gynäkologischen Malignoms erhielten vor und zwei Monate nach der onkologischen Zweitmeinung einen Fragebogen zu ihrer Einstellung zur Komplementär- und Alternativmedizin. Ergebnisse und Beobachtungen: Die Mehrheit der Patientinnen wies ein Mammakarzinom auf (72,2%, n = 70). Nur 6,2% (n = 6) der Patientinnen gaben an von den erstbehandelnden Ärzten bzw. 21,6 % (n = 21) im Rahmen der Zweitmeinung zur Komplementär- und Alternativmedizin informiert worden zu sein. Nach der Erstmeinung wollten 42,3% (n = 41) Komplementär- und Alternativmedizin ausprobieren und genau der gleiche Anteil vertraute nur auf Schulmedizin (42,3%, n = 41). Nach der Zweitmeinung wollten 24 Patientinnen (24,7%) Komplementär- und Alternativme­dizin ausprobieren, und 38,1% (n = 37) vertrauten aus­schließlich auf Schulmedizin. Es zeigte sich eine signifikante Korrelation zwischen einem erhöhten Informations-bedürfnis der Patientinnen und dem Interesse an Komplementär- und Alternativmedizin (p = 0,02). Schlussfolgerung: Im Rahmen der onkologischen Erst- oder Zweitmeinung wird auch heute noch in vielen Fällen nicht auf Aspekte der Komplementär- und Alternativmedizin ein­gegangen, was dazu führen kann, dass Patientinnen von der Komplementär- und Alternativmedizin Abstand neh­men. Der Aufbau von Sprechstunden für Komplementär- und Alternativmedizin in zertifizierten Onkologischen Zentren könnte hier hilfreich sein.

Genome-wide analysis identifies 32 loci associated with breast cancer susceptibility, accounting for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and tumor grade. Breast cancer susceptibility variants frequently show heterogeneity in associations by tumor subtype(1-3). To identify novel loci, we performed a genome-wide association study including 133,384 breast cancer cases and 113,789 controls, plus 18,908 BRCA1 mutation carriers (9,414 with breast cancer) of European ancestry, using both standard and novel methodologies that account for underlying tumor heterogeneity by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and tumor grade. We identified 32 novel susceptibility loci (P < 5.0 x 10(-8)), 15 of which showed evidence for associations with at least one tumor feature (false discovery rate < 0.05). Five loci showed associations (P < 0.05) in opposite directions between luminal and non-luminal subtypes. In silico analyses showed that these five loci contained cell-specific enhancers that differed between normal luminal and basal mammary cells. The genetic correlations between five intrinsic-like subtypes ranged from 0.35 to 0.80. The proportion of genome-wide chip heritability explained by all known susceptibility loci was 54.2% for luminal A-like disease and 37.6% for triple-negative disease. The odds ratios of polygenic risk scores, which included 330 variants, for the highest 1% of quantiles compared with middle quantiles were 5.63 and 3.02 for luminal A-like and triple-negative disease, respectively. These findings provide an improved understanding of genetic predisposition to breast cancer subtypes and will inform the development of subtype-specific polygenic risk scores.

Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) is known to affect the development of hormone-dependent endometrial carcinoma (type I EC). Several studies on breast and ovarian carcinoma have shown that HT influences the molecular profile and prognostic behavior of these tumors. This study aimed to investigate the influence of prior HT and other risk factors on the prognosis in a cohort of patients with invasive endometrial carcinoma (EC). Among 525 patients diagnosed with EC between 1987 and 2010, 426 postmenopausal patients were identified. Information regarding HT was available in 287 of these patients, 78 of whom had a history of HT and 209 of whom did not. Both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. In addition to OS and PFS, risk factors such as age at diagnosis, postmenopausal HT, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, tumor stage, EC type (I or II), and recurrences were analyzed. Relative to HT alone, women with EC and a history of HT had a longer survival than those with no HT. However, the Cox proportional hazards model showed that it was not HT itself, but rather other characteristics in the HT group that were causally associated with longer survival. Age (the older, the worse) and tumor stage (the higher, the worse) were significant influences on overall survival. Patients with HT also had lower BMIs, less diabetes, more type I EC, and fewer recurrences in comparison with the non-HT group. With regard to the PFS, it made no difference whether the patient was receiving HT.

ZusammenfassungDie Weiterentwicklung der Therapien für Frauen mit einem frühen Mammakarzinom schreitet deutlich langsamer voran als bei Patientinnen mit fortgeschrittenem Mammakarzinom und ist zudem zeitlich versetzt zu Entwicklungen beim metastasierten Mammakarzinom. Trotzdem konnten in letzter Zeit deutliche Fortschritte verzeichnet werden. Diese Übersichtsarbeit fasst die jüngsten Entwicklungen vor dem Hintergrund der neuesten Publikationen und Fachkongresse zusammen. Für hormonrezeptorpositive Patientinnen sind neue Aspekte für die Dauer der Antihormontherapie und in Bezug auf den Nutzen von Multigentests veröffentlicht worden. Bei HER2-positiven Patientinnen werden der Stellenwert einer post-neoadjuvanten Therapie und eine Deeskalation der Therapie diskutiert. Bei Patientinnen mit tripel-negativem Mammakarzinom stellt sich die Frage, ob das Wissen um den biologischen Hintergrund einer Defizienz der homologen Rekombination (HRD) dabei hilft, neue Therapien für diesen Subtyp zu entwickeln. Insbesondere die „Nutzung“ einer BRCA1/2-Mutation oder des biologischen Merkmals HRD als potenzielles Therapiemotiv spielen eine Rolle dabei, den Stellenwert der Platintherapie und einer Therapie mit PARP-Inhibitoren zu spezifizieren.

Background Breast cancer survivors are at risk for contralateral breast cancer (CBC), with the consequent burden of further treatment and potentially less favorable prognosis. We aimed to develop and validate a CBC risk prediction model and evaluate its applicability for clinical decision-making. Methods We included data of 132,756 invasive non-metastatic breast cancer patients from 20 studies with 4682 CBC events and a median follow-up of 8.8 years. We developed a multivariable Fine and Gray prediction model (PredictCBC-1A) including patient, primary tumor, and treatment characteristics and BRCA1/2 germline mutation status, accounting for the competing risks of death and distant metastasis. We also developed a model without BRCA1/2 mutation status (PredictCBC-1B) since this information was available for only 6% of patients and is routinely unavailable in the general breast cancer population. Prediction performance was evaluated using calibration and discrimination, calculated by a time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) at 5 and 10 years after diagnosis of primary breast cancer, and an internal-external cross-validation procedure. Decision curve analysis was performed to evaluate the net benefit of the model to quantify clinical utility. Results In the multivariable model, BRCA1/2 germline mutation status, family history, and systemic adjuvant treatment showed the strongest associations with CBC risk. The AUC of PredictCBC-1A was 0.63 (95% prediction interval (PI) at 5 years, 0.52–0.74; at 10 years, 0.53–0.72). Calibration-in-the-large was -0.13 (95% PI: -1.62–1.37), and the calibration slope was 0.90 (95% PI: 0.73–1.08). The AUC of Predict-1B at 10 years was 0.59 (95% PI: 0.52–0.66); calibration was slightly lower. Decision curve analysis for preventive contralateral mastectomy showed potential clinical utility of PredictCBC-1A between thresholds of 4–10% 10-year CBC risk for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. Conclusions We developed a reasonably calibrated model to predict the risk of CBC in women of European-descent; however, prediction accuracy was moderate. Our model shows potential for improved risk counseling, but decision-making regarding contralateral preventive mastectomy, especially in the general breast cancer population where limited information of the mutation status in BRCA1/2 is available, remains challenging.

Introduction Mammography is the gold standard for early breast cancer detection, but shows important limitations. Blood-based approaches on basis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) provide minimally invasive screening tools to characterize epigenetic alterations of tumor suppressor genes and could serve as a liquid biopsy, complementing mammography. Methods Potential biomarkers were identified from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), using HumanMethylation450-BeadChip data. Promoter methylation status was evaluated quantitatively by pyrosequencing in a serum test cohort (n = 103), a serum validation cohort (n = 368) and a plasma cohort (n = 125). Results SPAG6, NKX2-6 and PER1 were identified as novel biomarker candidates. ITIH5 was included on basis of our previous work. In the serum test cohort, a panel of SPAG6 and ITIH5 showed 63% sensitivity for DCIS and 51% sensitivity for early invasive tumor (pT1, pN0) detection at 80% specificity. The serum validation cohort revealed 50% sensitivity for DCIS detection on basis of NKX2-6 and ITIH5. Furthermore, an inverse correlation between methylation frequency and cfDNA concentration was uncovered. Therefore, markers were tested in a plasma cohort, achieving a 64% sensitivity for breast cancer detection using SPAG6, PER1 and ITIH5. Conclusions Although liquid biopsy remains challenging, a combination of SPAG6, NKX2-6, ITIH5 and PER1 (SNiPER) provides a promising tool for blood-based breast cancer detection.

British journal of cancer : BJC 121(12), 1009-1015 (2019). doi:10.1038/s41416-019-0630-3, Published by Nature Publ. Group, Edinburgh

ZusammenfassungDie Ergebnisse der internationalen St.-Gallen-Konsensus-Konferenz zur Behandlung des primären Mammakarzinoms wurden auch dieses Jahr von einer Arbeitsgruppe führender Brustkrebsexperten vor dem Hintergrund der Therapieempfehlungen für den Klinikalltag in Deutschland diskutiert. Drei der Brustkrebsexperten sind zugleich Mitglieder des diesjährigen St.-Gallen-Panels. Der Vergleich der St.-Gallen-Empfehlungen mit den jährlich aktualisierten Therapieempfehlungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGOMamma 2019) sowie der S3-Leitlinie ist sinnvoll, da die Empfehlungen des St.-Gallen-Panels ein Meinungsbild von Experten unterschiedlicher Länder und Fachdisziplinen darstellen. Die Empfehlungen der S3-Leitlinie und AGO basieren dagegen auf einer evidenzbasierten Literaturrecherche. Die diesjährige 16. St.-Gallen-Konferenz stand unter dem Motto „Magnitude of clinical benefit“. Neben der evidenzbasierten Grundlage muss jede Therapieentscheidung auch einer Nutzen-Risiko-Abwägung für die individuelle Situation einer Patientin unterzogen und mit der Patientin besprochen werden.

ZusammenfassungDurch den raschen Erkenntnisgewinn zu Tumorbiologie und Tumorpathogenese des triple-negativen Mammakarzinoms (TNBC) ergeben sich neue Therapieansätze und neue Therapiekonzepte für die Behandlung. Seit Jahren gilt das TNBC wegen seiner in der Regel aggressiven Tumorbiologie und angesichts limitierter Therapieoptionen als schwierig zu behandelnder Tumor. Das Rezidiv- und Metastasierungsrisiko ist höher als bei anderen Mammakarzinom-Subtypen desselben Stadiums. Neben Operation und Bestrahlung in der kurativen Situation ist die systemische Chemotherapie mit Anthrazyklinen und/oder Taxanen nach wie vor die Therapie der Wahl. Neue Therapieansätze basieren auf der Erkenntnis, dass das TNBC eine molekular sehr heterogene Erkrankung ist. Forschungsgruppen arbeiten daran, das TNBC immer besser auf molekularer Ebene zu klassifizieren und diese molekulare Subtypisierung als Grundlage für neue therapeutische Strategien zu nutzen. Im Folgenden werden die vielversprechendsten neuen Ansätze und Überlegungen zur Therapie des TNBCs dargestellt. Anhand einer fiktiven Kasuistik werden zudem die derzeitigen Therapiestrategien unter Berücksichtigung der aktuellen Datenlage und den sich daraus ergebenden therapeutischen Konsequenz besprochen.