Search

Background Weight changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for pancreatic cancer (PDAC) are not well studied. We hypothesized that weight loss may predict poor outcomes. Methods Weight change from NAC initiation to pancreatectomy was grouped: gain (≥5%), stable, and loss (≥5%). Pathologic, postoperative, and survival outcomes were compared. Results 95 patients were included: 31.6% lost weight, 58.9% maintained weight, and 9.5% gained weight. There were no differences in chemotherapeutic regimens. Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar between patients with stable weight and those who lost weight (RFS: 9.6vs14.0months; OS: 25.8vs26.7months). Among those who gained weight, RFS (29.5months) and OS (38.4months) were greater relative to the other weight categories. On multivariable regression, weight gain was associated with improved RFS compared to loss (HR = 0.16). Conclusion Most patients maintain or lose weight during NAC, and weight loss does not predict poor outcomes. Weight gain may predict improved RFS.

Most patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) do not undergo surgical resection. The role of radiotherapy (RT) in non-operatively managed localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma is unclear.The National Cancer Database (2010-2016) was queried for patients with clinical stage II-III PDAC treated with multiagent systemic chemotherapy (CT) +/- RT but not surgery. Factors associated with the receipt of RT and overall survival were compared after adjusting for patient demographics and clinical characteristics.A total of 14,921 patients were included, of whom 9279 received CT and 5382 received CT + RT. Patients treated with CT + RT were more likely to be younger (65vs66yrs), treated at non-academic facilities (48.8%vs46.7%), have private insurance (40.3%vs36.5%), and have clinical T4 tumors (53.6%vs48.7%). Most patients who were treated with RT received external beam radiotherapy (89.3%), and the median dose was 5,000 cGy. Median time to start of RT was 129 days. CT + RT was associated with longer overall survival (15.9vs11.8mos,p 0.001), and remained associated with survival on multivariable analysis (HR 0.74, 95%CI 0.70-0.78). On a 4-month conditional survival analysis, combined CT + RT remained associated with improved survival compared to CT alone (16.0vs13.1mos,p 0.001).In patients with non-operatively managed localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma, combined radiotherapy and multiagent systemic chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone.

Background The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposed reimbursement cuts for operations in 2021. Literature examining reimbursement for common operations is scarce. Methods Reimbursement rates were abstracted (2011–2021). Trends in reimbursement rates were analyzed using linear regression. Results From 2011 to 2021, the national inflation rate was 16.3%. Unadjusted reimbursement rates for open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs increased by 6.5% and 7.2%, respectively. There was an increase in unadjusted reimbursement for open appendectomies of 5.1% and 6.1% for laparoscopic. Unadjusted reimbursement for open cholecystectomies increased by 4.4%, but decreased by 6.8% for laparoscopic. When adjusted to 2021 values, reimbursement for all six operations decreased. Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies experienced the largest decreases (19.8%, 10.2%). Conclusion Since 2011, there have been decreases in adjusted reimbursement for three common operations, independent of operative approach. Awareness of trends in reimbursement rates should be a priority to ensure sustainable general surgical care.

There is evidence that neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival compared with upfront pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Treatment at high-volume pancreatic surgery centers is associated with improved short-term postoperative outcomes compared with low-volume centers. We compared overall survival of patients with early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant therapy before resection stratified by facility volume.Patients with clinical T0 to T2 pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant therapy before pancreatoduodenectomy were identified in the National Cancer Database (2010-2016). High-volume pancreatic surgery centers performed ≥36 pancreatectomies/year. Patients were matched 1:1 by propensity score. Pathologic outcomes, postoperative outcomes, and overall survival were compared.Before matching, 1,449 patients were treated at low-volume centers and 250 at high-volume pancreatic surgery centers. After matching, there were 177 patients per group. High-volume pancreatic surgery centers were more commonly academic/research facilities (99.4% vs 54.0%; P.001), and patients traveled greater distances (65 vs 13 miles; P.001). Time from diagnosis to neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was similar. Treatment at high-volume pancreatic surgery centers was associated with shorter duration of stay (7 vs 8 days; P = .003) and lower 90-day mortality rate after pancreatoduodenectomy (0.0% vs 5.0%; P = .01). Patients treated at high-volume pancreatic surgery centers had improved overall survival (36.3 vs 29.4 months; P = .03; hazard ratio 0.73). On subset analysis of academic/research facilities, high-volume pancreatic surgery centers remained associated with shorter duration of stay, lower 90-day mortality, and greater overall survival.The majority of patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma received care at low-volume centers. Treatment at high-volume pancreatic surgery centers was associated with improved overall survival and short-term postoperative outcomes.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has the worst survival of common cancers, partly because there are no reliable early detection tests. Unintentional weight loss (≥ 5% decrease from baseline) has been linked to PDAC, but the frequency and severity of weight loss using objective measures, and its relationship to prognosis, have not been well characterized. We identified 390 patients with PDAC (all stages) and two or more prediagnosis weights in the electronic medical record. Percentage weight loss in the 365 and 180 days preceding diagnosis was calculated. Results were compared with raw weights of age- and sex-matched non-cancer controls (n = 780). Odds ratios for PDAC were calculated using conditional logistic regression. Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival. Within 1 year of diagnosis, more PDAC patients lost ≥ 5% weight relative to controls (74.9% vs. 11.2%; p

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has historically poor outcomes. Difficult decisions must be made by patients and providers, especially in the elderly for whom treatment morbidities may not be tolerable. Herein, we report treatment-dependent outcomes of octogenarians with localized PDAC. The National Cancer Database identified patients ≥60 years with localized PDAC of the pancreatic head (2011–2016). Patients were grouped by age (60–79 and ≥80 years) and categorized by treatment regimen: no treatment, chemotherapy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy with perioperative chemotherapy, or pancreaticoduodenectomy with adjuvant chemotherapy. Postoperative outcomes and survival were analyzed. A total of 35,409 patients were included, 8745 (24.7%) of which were ≥80 years. Over 52% of octogenarians did not receive any treatment, compared to 19.1% of younger patients (p

Overall survival (OS) has increased in recent adjuvant clinical trials of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Although oncologists have taken notice, the root causes have not been fully examined. All phase 3 adjuvant PDAC clinical trials were screened (n = 13), and eight trials (2007–2019) that met a study requirement of having a gemcitabine monotherapy arm to serve as a uniform comparative anchor across trials were identified. Patient enrollment eligibility criteria were compared across trials and categorized as tumor- or patient-related factors. Disease-free survival (DFS) and OS in the gemcitabine-only and non-gemcitabine arms were plotted and compared over time using linear regression. In the non-gemcitabine arms, OS increased over time, but the slope did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.0815). Interestingly, OS improved for patients receiving only gemcitabine (slope, 1.99 months; p = 0.0018), whereas DFS remained constant (p = 0.897). Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 values and pathologic profiles of tumors were only marginally different across all cohorts. Recent adjuvant trials had stricter inclusion criteria (i.e., more patients were excluded for medical reasons; linear regression, p = 0.010). Survival for patients with resected PDAC has roughly doubled in phase 3 adjuvant trials during the past decade. Improved outcomes likely are attributable to improved adjuvant therapeutic regimens, but also reflect healthier patients enrolled in the more recent trials.

Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is considered more effective in downstaging hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer than neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET), particularly in node-positive disease. This study compared breast and axillary response and survival after NCT and NET in HR+ breast cancer. Methods Based on American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1031 criteria, women age 50 years or older with cT2-4 HR+ breast cancer who underwent NET or NCT and surgery were identified in the National Cancer Database 2010–2016. Chi-square and logistic regression analysis determined differences between the NCT and NET groups and therapy response, including downstaging and pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/is and ypN0). Results Of 19,829 patients, 14,025 (70.7%) received NCT and 5804 (29.3%) received NET. The NET patients were older (mean age, 68.9 vs. 60.3; P < 0.001) and had greater comorbidity (1+ Charlson–Deyo score, 21% vs. 16%; P < 0.001). Therapy achieved T downstaging (any) for 58% of the patients with NCT versus 40.5% of the patients with NET, and in-breast pCR was achieved for 9.3% of the NCT versus 1.3% of the NET patients (P < 0.001). Approximately half of the mastectomy procedures could have been potentially avoided for the patients with in-breast pCR (53.6% of the NCT and 43.8% of the NET patients). For the cN+ patients, N downstaging (any) was 29% for the NCT patients versus 18.3% for the NET patients (P < 0.001), and nodal pCR was achieved for 20.3% of the NCT versus 13.5% of the NET patients (P < 0.001). Among those with nodal pCR, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) still was performed for 56% of the patients after NCT and 45% of the patients after NET. Conclusions Although the response rates after NCT were higher, NET achieved both T and N downstaging and pCR. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy can be used to de-escalate surgery for patients who cannot tolerate NCT or when chemotherapy may not be effective based on genomic testing. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10459-3.

Background: Immunotherapy (IT) has led to improved survival in several common cancers but success in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been limited. We analyzed if combination IT–chemotherapy (IT-CT) is associated with improved survival compared with chemotherapy alone (CT) in patients with metastatic PDAC. Methods: The National Cancer Database (2004–2016) was queried for patients who were diagnosed with metastatic PDAC. Patients were categorized by treatment group: CT only and IT-CT. Patients were excluded if they received radiation or a surgical procedure. The primary outcome was overall survival. Results: A total of 59,289 patients were identified, of whom 58,947 (99.4%) received CT and 342 (0.6%) received IT-CT. The IT-CT group was younger, had fewer comorbidities, and was more often treated at an academic center. The utilization of multiagent CT was similar between the groups. Median survival of patients treated with IT-CT was longer than CT alone (7.9 months vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.005). On multivariable analysis, receipt of IT-CT was associated with a survival advantage as compared with CT (hazard ratio = 0.86, 95% confidence intervals 0.76–0.97) when adjusting for demographics and type of CT regimen. Conclusion: In patients with metastatic PDAC, it appears that combination IT-CT may perhaps be associated with a survival advantage compared with CT alone.

Background Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas has historically poor survival. We analyzed survival outcomes stratified by treatment regimen and sequence using an administrative dataset. Methods Adult patients with nonmetastatic adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas were identified using the National Cancer Database (2010−2016). Multivariable analyses were used to determine factors associated with receipt of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariable Cox model was used to evaluate factors associated with survival. Results A total of 838 patients with adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas were included in the analysis. The median age was 69 years and 64.7% of patients underwent pancreatectomy. Among patients who underwent pancreatectomy, 60.5% received adjuvant chemotherapy, 14.8% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 24.7% underwent surgery alone. Older age and increasing comorbidity index were associated with a reduced likelihood of receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Median survival of patients who received chemotherapy alone was similar compared with patients who underwent pancreatectomy alone (9.2 vs 7.2 months, P = .504). Survival was improved if patients received both chemotherapy and pancreatectomy (neoadjuvant = 19.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.58; adjuvant = 19.4 months, hazard ratio = 0.64) compared with pancreatectomy alone. Conclusion Patients with adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas who do not receive multimodal therapy have poor survival. The sequence of chemotherapy and pancreatectomy is not associated with survival, but 25% of patients who undergo surgery do not receive chemotherapy. Given that there is no difference in median survival between patients who undergo pancreatectomy alone or receive chemotherapy alone, our data question whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in patients with potentially resectable adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas.

Background Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly utilized in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The type of neoadjuvant therapy and its effect on pathologic response remains understudied. Methods A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by pancreatectomy. Multivariable regressions were used to determine associations between neoadjuvant therapy regimens and pathologic response. Results Seventy-five patients with pathologic responses available for review received FOLFIRINOX (61%) or gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel (39%). Demographics, histologic differentiation, and utilization of chemoradiation were similar between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that chemoradiation was associated with an increased likelihood of a complete or near-complete pathologic response and a decreased rate of lymphovascular invasion and lymph node positivity. Neither chemotherapy regimen nor number of cycles administered were associated with pathologic response. Conclusions Neoadjuvant chemoradiation may be associated with complete or near-complete pathologic response regardless of chemotherapy regimen in pancreatic cancer patients.

408 Background: Multi-agent chemotherapy (CT) with or without radiotherapy (RT) is the standard of care for non-metastatic Type B locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Irreversible electroporation (IRE) has been described as a treatment modality in patients with LAPC but published postoperative morbidity and mortality rates are high for a non-curative procedure. There have been few studies that have compared directly IRE with standard of care CT ± RT. We performed a meta-analysis of the available literature to compare the outcomes between these treatment groups in LAPC. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library in September 2020. Studies that focused on comparing outcomes between IRE and CT ± RT for LAPC were selected for further study. The impact of IRE versus CT ± RT was evaluated using forest plot analysis. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) served as the primary endpoints. As a secondary objective, short term morbidity and mortality data in both groups was evaluated. Results: Our search yielded 326 papers. After excluding duplicates, 3 studies met inclusion criteria. All were retrospective. Combined, these studies included clinical data on 3,862 patients. The meta-analysis indicated that patients with LAPC who underwent IRE had better OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28-0.74) and PFS (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.24-0.60) compared to patients who received CT ± RT. Due to incomplete morbidity, 30-, and 90- day mortality information reported in the included studies, further analysis was not performed for the same. Conclusions: There is a striking paucity of studies comparing IRE with the standard of care treatment approaches for LAPC. Our meta-analysis reveals that IRE has been associated with longer OS and PFS compared to CT ± RT. However, these studies are limited by retrospective study design, heterogeneity of population and chemotherapy regimens, and incomplete morbidity data, precluding any conclusions. Until higher quality, comparative retrospective studies, or more importantly, prospective studies with standardized indications are conducted, IRE should be used with caution and remains experimental in the treatment of PDAC.

416 Background: Over the last decade, various landmark trials have demonstrated the impact of multi-agent chemotherapy in the treatment of PDAC. However, the impact in the ‘real world’ has been less clear. The ACCORD trial (2011) was a phase III trial comparing combination chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX) and single agent (gemcitabine) for advanced disease. The MPACT trial introduced another beneficial regimen (nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine) in 2013. Subsequently, multi-agent chemotherapy became standard of care for medically appropriate patients. Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify patients diagnosed with PDAC between 1998 and 2017. The cohort was divided into two groups: 1998-2011 (pre-ACCORD) and 2012-2017 (post-ACCORD). We analyzed all patients with metastatic PDAC for overall survival and compared results in the two groups using Kaplan Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. An interrupted time series analysis was also used to compare the temporal trends in 2-year survival between 1998 and 2017. Results: A total of 47,134 patients were diagnosed with PDAC between 1998 and 2017. Nearly two-third of patients (26,438; 57%) had distant disease. On univariate survival analysis, there was a significant increased overall survival probability in the 2012-17 group compared to the 1998-2011 group (p