Search

BACKGROUND Little level 1 evidence exists to guide multimodality treatment in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS), which may lead to significant variation in therapeutic approaches. This analysis aimed to describe national RPS treatment trends and explore potential variability among low-/high-volume hospitals (LVH/HVHs). PATIENTS AND METHODS In total, 5992 patients who underwent resection for primary RPS were retrospectively identified in the National Cancer Database (2004-2017). Time trend analyses examined rates of multivisceral resection (MVR), radiation, and chemotherapy use. LVHs were defined as those carrying out fewer than ten resections per year (N = 5433), whereas HVHs were defined as those carrying out ten or more (N = 559). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models compared trends between groups. RESULTS MVR was more frequent at HVHs (63.7% versus 43.5%, p < 0.001). Use of radiation varied widely by hospital volume. HVHs more frequently employed preoperative radiation as compared with LVHs (14.7% versus 8.1%, p < 0.001). Throughout the study period, LVHs increased utilization of preoperative radiation (2.6% to 12.0%, p < 0.001) whereas rates at HVHs remained stable. Overall, LVHs utilized postoperative radiation significantly more frequently as compared with HVHs (14.7% versus 2.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). Postoperative radiation at LVHs remained stable until 2013 and sharply declined thereafter (16.7% to 6.9%, p < 0.001). Rates of postoperative radiation use at HVHs remained lower than those at LVHs at all time points. CONCLUSIONS Strategies for resection and radiation use at LVHs have trended towards those of HVHs. Current national implementation of preoperative radiation, MVR, and chemotherapy remains heterogeneous. These findings inform future trial design and support standardization of care.

Myxoid liposarcoma are responsive to radiotherapy, particularly preoperative radiotherapy. The outcome of the preoperative radiation is a decreasing tumor size and major necrotizing area. With a good local control, organ functions can survive without any amputation. Preoperative radiotherapy can be given with or without chemotherapy. Conventional fractionation such as 25 x 2 Gy or hypofractionation 5 x 5 Gy could be an effective way to treat preoperative myxoid liposarcoma.

Introduction Chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) has increasingly been employed for the treatment of laryngeal cancer at T3 or higher rather than total laryngectomy (TL), in order to preserve the larynx. However, TL is still frequently performed in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer, especially T4 disease. When CRT is performed for advanced cancer, there is a certain rate of residual disease or relapse, and TL is conducted as salvage surgery for those patients, but TL following CRT is associated with a high incidence of postoperative complications. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of preoperative radiation therapy on the occurrence of postoperative complications of TL, particularly pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF). Methods We retrospectively investigated 142 patients who underwent TL for laryngeal cancer whether postoperative complications were related to a history of radiation therapy or neck dissection. Detailed investigation of the 32 patients who underwent radiation therapy was also conducted. Results PCF was significantly higher after radiation therapy. Neck dissection was not related. As the time from radiation therapy to TL decreased, the incidence rate of postoperative PCF increased and the time to closure became significantly longer. Preoperative laboratory tests did not show a significant difference in Hb and Alb, but the lymphocyte count was significantly lower in patients with PCF.

Introduction: This study aimed to establish the urologic complications of radical type C2 hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with or without ureteral stenting. Methods: This prospective randomized study included 76 (100%) patients with clinically and pathologically established cervical cancer stages I and II treated with radical type C2 hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for the last 5 years (2014–2019). Patients were randomized into two groups (2:1 ratio): group II received perioperative ureteral stenting ( n = 24, 31.6%) and group I did not ( n = 52, 68.4%). Urologic complications observed during follow-up include intraoperative ureter and urinary bladder lesions and postoperative ureterovaginal and vesicovaginal fistulas. Results: Of the 52 patients in group I who underwent surgery for cervical cancer, urologic complications were observed in 8 (10.5%) patients, 2 (2.6%) of whom underwent preoperative radiation therapy. In group II, urologic complications were observed in 2 (2.6%) patients, of which 1 (1.3%) received preoperative radiation therapy. Intraoperative urologic complications in group I (6.6%) included 3 (3.9%) ureteral lesions cases and 2 (2.6%) cases of urinary bladder lesions, wherein 1 patient received preoperative radiation therapy. One case of (1.3%) urinary bladder lesion was observed in group II. Postoperative complications were observed in 3 patients (3.9%) in group I, including 2 (2.6%) ureterovaginal fistula cases, wherein 1 (1.3%) patient received preoperative radiation therapy, and 1 (1.3%) case of vesicovaginal fistula. In group II, 1 (1.3%) patient who received perioperative radiotherapy developed postoperative vesicovaginal fistula. Discussion: Urologic complications are extremely common during and after radical surgery (hysterectomy type C2) for cervical cancer. The cervical cancer stage had a significant effect on intra- and postoperative urologic complication rates in this study; however, no such effect was observed for preoperative radiation therapy and ureteral stenting, and significant differences were observed between the two study groups.

Liposarcomas are a common subfamily of soft tissue sarcoma with several subtypes recognized by the World Health Organization: atypical lipomatous tumors (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS), pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLPS), and myxoid pleomorphic liposarcoma (MPLPS). Despite shared adipocytic features among liposarcomas, the clinical approach to each subtype differs based on histology, location, clinical behavior, and specific oncogenic drivers. In this review, we highlight subtype-specific molecular features with the potential to generate novel therapies. We discuss recent clinical trials investigating the use of preoperative radiation therapy for retroperitoneal liposarcoma, chemotherapy, small molecule inhibitors, and innovative immunotherapy approaches and describe how we incorporate these advancements into the management of liposarcoma.

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) are rare diseases, and the 5-year overall survival rate remains low. Management of RPSs is challenging, and the quality of treatment strategy is a crucial prognostic factor. Treatment decisions and the treatment department to which the patients is referred must be centralized. Overall survival rate is positively correlated with the number of patients treated in the centers. En bloc surgery is the standard of care for effective treatment and potential for cure, whereas perioperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy has not yet been validated. Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy was considered controversial, but the STRASS trial publication illustrated that preoperative radiation could be useful in some conditions. Retroperitoneal liposarcoma might become a future target of prospective trials. Furthermore, some retrospective studies have shown that preoperative radiotherapy increases the rate of R0-R1 resections. This article reviews the role of external beam radiotherapy in the management of RPS and highlights the optimal volumes, doses, and radiotherapy techniques for the treatment of RPS. As accurately predicting prognosis in patients with RPS is challenging, we also emphasize the utility of nomograms in the field of radiotherapy. However, these nomograms do not include radiotherapy as a predictive factor. Although some authors could conclude that use of radiotherapy should be avoided based on the results of the STRASS trial, some data argue that radiotherapy still has utility in select cases.

Background Postoperative radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcomas demonstrated good local recurrence-free survival rates and survival outcomes. However, the results remained controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the role of preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy for the treatment of resectable soft tissue sarcomas. Methods The electronic database PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were performed from inception till 30 November, 2019. The effect of preoperative versus postoperative radiation therapy on resectable soft tissue sarcomas was compared and then assessed. Results A total of 15 studies with 12,813 patients were included, and most of these had acceptable quality scores. Of these, 10 studies reported data on local recurrence. The pooled results indicated no significant differences between preoperative radiotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy groups for local recurrence, with a risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.84 (95%CI = 0.58–1.21). No difference was observed in the overall survival and distant metastasis between the two groups. According to the pooled results, preoperative radiotherapy group showed a significant risk for complications (RR = 2.11, 95%CI = 1.36–3.27). Conclusions The postoperative radiation therapy does not increase the local recurrence, overall survival, and distant metastasis, but might result in lowering complications.

For localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS), treatment is individualized and each patient needs to be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team at a referral sarcoma center specialized in the care of sarcoma. For a majority of patients, treatment for eSTS involves limb-salvage surgery, with or without the addition of radiation therapy. Surgery should only be performed by surgeons specifically fellowship trained in the resection of eSTS. Surgery alone may be considered for small, low-grade, and superficial tumors as long a wide (≥ 2 cm) margin can be achieved. In cases where a less than wide negative margin can be achieved, radiation therapy should be utilized to facilitate a planned close margin resection to preserve critical structures (such as nerves, blood vessels, and bone) without a significant impact on oncologic outcomes. Soft tissue sarcomas are rare, and as such patients often present following an inadvertent excision. In these situations, we recommend preoperative radiation and wide tumor bed re-excision, as rates of residual tumor can be high in this scenario. While there is large amount of evidence to support the use of radiotherapy to enhance local tumor control, the evidence to support the use of chemotherapy to enhance local tumor control is lacking, and as such cannot be recommended for all patients.

Patients with rectal cancer in whom the mesorectal fascia is threatened by tumour are more likely than all patients with stage II/III disease to benefit from preoperative radiotherapy (RT). The objective of this study was to assess whether the status of the mesorectal fascia versus a stage II/III designation can best inform the use of preoperative RT in patients undergoing major rectal cancer resection.We reviewed the charts of consecutive patients with primary rectal cancer treated by a single surgeon at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, between March 2006 and December 2012. The status of the mesorectal fascia was assessed by digital rectal examination, pelvic computed tomography and, when needed, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients whose mesorectal fascia was threatened or involved by tumour received preoperative RT. The study outcomes were rates of positive circumferential radial margin (CRM) and local tumour recurrence.A total of 153 patients were included, of whom 76 (49.7%) received preoperative RT because of concerns of a compromised mesorectal fascia. The median length of follow-up was 4.5 years. The number of CRM-positive cases in the RT and no-RT groups was 16 (22%) and 1 (1%), respectively (The status of the mesorectal fascia, not tumour stage, may best identify patients for preoperative RT.Plus que tous les patients présentant une maladie de stade II/III, les patients atteints d’un cancer du rectum dont le fascia mésorectal est menacé par la tumeur sont de bons candidats à la radiothérapie (RT) préopératoire. L’objectif de cette étude était d’évaluer ce qui, entre l’état du fascia mésorectal et une désignation de stade II/III, permet le mieux de confirmer le bien-fondé d’une RT préopératoire chez les patients qui doivent subir une résection majeure pour cancer du rectum.Nous avons passé en revue les dossiers de patients consécutifs atteints d’un cancer rectal primaire traités par un seul chirurgien à l’Université McMaster, à Hamilton, en Ontario, entre mars 2006 et décembre 2012. L’état du fascia mésorectal a été évalué par toucher rectal, tomodensitométrie pelvienne et, au besoin, imagerie par résonnance magnétique (IRM) pelvienne. Les patients dont le fascia mésorectal était menacé ou affecté par la tumeur ont reçu une RT préopératoire. Les paramètres de l’étude étaient : taux de positivité de la marge radiale circonférentielle (MRC) et récurrence de la tumeur locale.En tout, 153 patients ont été inclus, dont 76 (49,7 %) ont reçu une RT préopératoire en raison d’une atteinte du fascia mésorectal. La durée moyenne du suivi a été de 4,5 ans. Dans les groupes soumis et non soumis à la RT, les nombres de cas MRC-positifs ont été respectivement de 16 (22 %) et de 1 (1 %), (C’est l’état du fascia mésorectal et non le stade de la tumeur qui peut le mieux permettre d’identifier les candidats à une RT préopératoire.

Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is increasingly utilized for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) but the nationwide incidence and long-term prognosis of a pathologic complete response (pCR) remains poorly understood.Patients with localized PDAC and known cT and pT stage who received NT prior to pancreatectomy from 2004 to 2016 were identified using the National Cancer Database. The clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients who did and did not experience a pCR were compared.Among 7,902 patients who underwent NT prior to pancreatectomy, 244 (3.1%) experienced a pCR while 7,658 (96.9%) did not. On multivariable regression, longer duration of NT (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.14-1.27 per month) and use of preoperative radiation (OR 9.98, 95% CI 3.05-32.71) were independently associated with a pCR. Median overall survival (OS) was longer among patients who experienced a pCR (77 vs 26 months, p 0.001). On multivariate analysis, pCR was the strongest predictor of improved OS (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.32-0.58, p 0.001).A pCR following NT for PDAC occurs infrequently but is associated with significantly improved OS. Better predictors of response and more effective preoperative regimens should be aggressively sought.

Background There are several therapeutic strategies for the management of resectable stage IIIA/N2 non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the role of radiotherapy as a preoperative adjuvant therapy is unclear. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients who either underwent preoperative radiation (PrORT), or did not undergo preoperative radiation, collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, between 2004 and 2013. The primary endpoints were cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Results Ultimately, 493 patients treated with preoperative radiation and 2675 patients treated who were not treated with preoperative radiation, were included in the analysis. Overall, preoperative radiation was associated with a better CSS (HR: 1.427 [1.297‐1.572], P = 0.014) and OS (HR: 1.220 [1.131‐1.493], P = 0.002) than that observed in patients who did not undergo preoperative radiation. After PSM, preoperative radiation still showed advantage in both CSS and OS. Only age, T stage, and preoperative radiation remained independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. In the subgroup analysis, the advantages of preoperative radiotherapy were more pronounced in patients with stage T3 tumors and highly differentiated tumors. Conclusions Preoperative radiation may improve the outcomes of resectable IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients. In IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients, particularly with T3 and highly differentiated tumors, clinicians should boldly apply preoperative radiotherapy to improve the patients' survival.

BACKGROUND Although surgery remains the cornerstone of gastric cancer therapy, the use of radiation therapy (RT) is increasingly being employed to optimize outcomes. We sought to assess outcomes following use of RT for the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma. METHODS Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) from 1998 to 2012, all patients with resected gastric adenocarcinoma were identified. Patients were stratified into four groups based on preoperative therapy: RT alone, chemotherapy only, chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and no preoperative therapy. Overall survival was estimated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Adjusted secondary outcomes include margin positivity, lymph node harvest, LOS, 30-day readmission and mortality. RESULTS A total of 10 019 patients met study criteria. In the unadjusted analysis, patients undergoing CRT compared to chemotherapy alone had fewer positive margins (7.9% vs 15.9%; P

Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the cornerstones in the current treatment paradigm for glioblastoma (GBM). However, little has changed in the management of GBM since the establishment of the current protocol in 2005, and the prognosis remains grim. Radioresistance is one of the hallmarks for treatment failure, and different therapeutic strategies are aimed at overcoming it. Among these strategies, nanomedicine has advantages over conventional tumor therapeutics, including improvements in drug delivery and enhanced antitumor properties. Radiosensitizing strategies using nanoparticles (NP) are actively under study and hold promise to improve the treatment response. We aim to describe the basis of nanomedicine for GBM treatment, current evidence in radiosensitization efforts using nanoparticles, and novel strategies, such as preoperative radiation, that could be synergized with nanoradiosensitizers.

BACKGROUND Nipple-areola complex malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy can be a challenging issue to correct. The current literature is largely limited to smaller series and implant-based reconstructions. METHODS A retrospective review of all nipple-sparing mastectomies from 2006 to 2016 at a single institution was performed. Incidence, risk factors, and corrective techniques of nipple-areola complex malposition were analyzed. RESULTS One thousand thirty-seven cases of nipple-sparing mastectomy were identified, of which 77 (7.4 percent) underwent nipple-areola complex repositioning. All were performed in a delayed fashion. The most common techniques included crescentic periareolar excision [n = 25 (32.5 percent)] and directional skin excision [n = 10 (13.0 percent)]. Cases requiring nipple-areola complex repositioning were significantly more likely to have preoperative radiation therapy (p = 0.0008), a vertical or Wise pattern incision (p = 0.0157), autologous reconstruction (p = 0.0219), and minor mastectomy flap necrosis (p = 0.0462). Previous radiation therapy (OR, 3.6827; p = 0.0028), vertical radial mastectomy incisions (OR, 1.8218; p = 0.0202), and autologous reconstruction (OR, 1.77; p = 0.0053) were positive independent predictors of nipple-areola complex repositioning, whereas implant-based reconstruction (OR, 0.5552; p < 0.0001) was a negative independent predictor of repositioning. Body mass index (p = 0.7104) and adjuvant radiation therapy (p = 0.9536), among other variables, were not predictors of nipple-areola complex repositioning. CONCLUSIONS Nipple-areola complex malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy can be successfully corrected with various techniques. Previous radiation therapy, vertical mastectomy incisions, and autologous reconstruction are independently predictive of nipple-areola complex malposition. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.

Background:. The inverted T (Wise pattern) mastectomy for patients with macromastia or significant breast ptosis has evolved along with generalized techniques for breast reconstruction. We present a review of Wise pattern breast reconstruction along with our technique for direct to implant reconstruction using dermal matrix. Methods:. The literature was reviewed and an analysis of techniques and complications was performed. We present our series of patients incorporating dermal matrix and relatively large implants in direct to implant reconstruction. Results:. Of 18 breasts reconstructed only 2 failed. One caused by flap necrosis secondary to smoking and one as a result of preoperative radiation. Conclusion:. Wise pattern breast reconstruction using relatively large implants and dermal matrix in direct to implant reconstruction is a safe technique in selected patients with macromastia.

e13531 Background: Preoperative radiation therapy (RT) followed by surgery is the main effective treatment for colorectal cancer. However, some patients do not respond to preoperative RT due to the radioresistance of tumor cells, depending on their molecular characteristics, in particular on the expression of a certain group of genes. The aim of this work was to study the effect of expression of BRCA2, H2AX, RBBP8, CASP9 and BCL2 genes on the effectiveness of preoperative RT for rectal tumors. Methods: In the study, paired biopsy preparations (obtained by VCS before irradiation) of normal and tumor tissues of the rectum (adenocarcinoma G1-2) in 30 patients were used. RT was carried out on a Novalis TX linear accelerator (Varian, USA) (SFD = 2.4 Gy to TFD = 54 Gy). RNA isolation was performed by Chomczynski&Sacchi method. Reverta-L kits were used to synthesize cDNA libraries. Using the RT-qPCR method, the relative expression of 5 genes was determined: BRCA2, H2AX, CASP9, RBBP8 and BCL2 (reference GAPDH, ACTB and B2M). Statistical analysis was performed using the Shapiro–Wilk and Mann–Whitney criteria. Results: 2 clusters of patients were identified that differed in the expression of the BRCA2, H2AX, CASP9, RBBP8 and BCL2 genes. In cluster 1, 81% of patients had increased expression of the CASP9 gene and 100% decreased expression of the BRCA2, H2AX, RBBP8, and BCL2 genes. In cluster 2, the expression of the CASP9 gene was reduced in 100% of patients and the expression of the BRCA2, H2AX, RBBP8 and BCL2 genes was increased in 93%. A subsequent analysis of the results of RT showed that 16 patients had complete tumor regression after RT, while expression of the H2AX and RBBP8 genes was reduced by a factor of 2 (p < 0.05), and the expression of the CASP9 gene was increased by a factor of 4 (p < 0.005) relative to normal tissues. 8 patients showed slight tumor regression, and 6 patients had no regression at all, while their expression of the BRCA2, H2AX, RBBP8 and BCL2 genes was statistically significantly (p < 0.005) 2, 4, 6 and 3 times higher, respectively, and that of CASP9 gene was 4 times lower than in patients with complete tumor regression. Conclusions: The study found that the expression of BRCA2, H2AX, CASP9, RBBP8 and BCL2 genes affects the effectiveness of RT, enhancing it in patients with increased expression of CASP9 and reduced expression of H2AX and RBBP8, and vice versa, the effectiveness of therapy decreases with increased expression of H2AX, RBBP8, BRCA2 and BCL2.

e19214 Background: ARST1321(PAZNTIS): A Phase II/III Randomized Trial of Preoperative Chemoradiation or Preoperative Radiation Plus or Minus Pazopanib (NCT02180867) was the first National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) study co-developed by pediatric (COG) and adult (NRG Oncology) consortia anticipating enrollment of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients. ARST1321 had two treatment cohorts, enrolling patients ≥ 2 years of age to either chemotherapy (C) (chemoradiation ± pazopanib) or non-chemotherapy (NC) (radiation ± pazopanib) arms. It was anticipated adults would contribute the majority of enrollments on the NC arm based on prior enrollment patterns. While the C arm accrued as anticipated (with high enrollment of adults and children), the NC arm had low enrollment leading to premature closure. We report on AYA accrual (defined as 15-39 years) to the NC arm and a survey aiming to identify barriers to enrolling AYA patients onto ARST1321. Methods: Our survey was emailed to 161 adult, surgical, and radiation oncologists at large sarcoma centers. A link was sent to an online questionnaire via SurveyMonkey Inc. and responses were reviewed on their platform. Results: 33 patients enrolled on the ARST1321 NC arm, of which 24% were AYA. 25% of AYA enrollments were from non-COG adult cooperative groups. This trial arm was closed in October 2017 after 3.25 years of accrual below anticipated rates. The survey response rate was 31% with a 70% completion rate. Almost half of respondents were medical oncologists with most seeing 50-200 new sarcoma cases/year at an academic institution and 30% in a pediatric environment (divided equally between radiation and surgical oncologists). 70% of respondents have a joint collaboration with their pediatric oncology team with 23% having a joint clinic. 70% of respondents’ sites opened ARST1321 and anticipated 1-5 patients would be eligible for the NC cohort. However, 42% of respondents’ sites had zero patients enrolled on that arm. The most common reasons for not opening the study and/or not enrolling patients on the NC arm included: lack of interest, disagreement with the therapy, lack of a site investigator, premature study closure, patient/family decision, competing trials, insufficient reimbursement, and regulatory delays. Conclusions: Our survey highlights multiple barriers to enrollment of AYA onto cross-NCTN consortia clinical trials spanning the age spectrum. The information obtained will help inform investigators aiming to effectively design, enroll, and conduct similar trial efforts for AYA in the future.

The annual Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2017 was held in St. John&rsquo, s, Newfoundland and Labrador, 28&ndash, 30 September. Experts in radiation oncology, medical oncology, surgical oncology, and cancer genetics who are involved in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies participated in presentations and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses multiple topics in the management of gastric, rectal, and colon cancer, including &#9632, identification and management of hereditary gastric and colorectal cancer (crc), &#9632, palliative systemic therapy for metastatic gastric cancer, optimum duration of preoperative radiation in rectal cancer&mdash, that is, short- compared with long-course radiation, management options for peritoneal carcinomatosis in crc, implications of tumour location for treatment and prognosis in crc, and &#9632, new molecular markers in crc.

Uncontrolled blood glucose impacts key phases of the wound healing process. Various factors have been associated with postoperative wound complications in soft tissue sarcomas; however, the association of postoperative early morning blood glucose with wound complications, if any, remains to be determined. Because blood glucose levels may be modified, understanding whether glucose levels are associated with wound complications has potential therapeutic importance.The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate if postoperative early morning blood glucose is associated with the development of wound complications in soft tissue sarcomas; (2) to determine a blood glucose cutoff that may be associated with an increased risk of wound complications; and (3) to evaluate if patients with diabetes have higher postoperative blood glucose and an associated increased risk of wound complications.From 2000 to 2015, 298 patients with Stage I to III soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity or chest wall were treated with preoperative radiation ± chemotherapy followed by limb-sparing resection. Of those, 191 (64%) patients had demographic, treatment, and postoperative variables and wound outcomes available; these patients' results were retrospectively evaluated. None of the 191 patients were lost to followup. Early morning blood glucose levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 were available in all patients. Wound complications were defined as those resulting in an operative procedure or prolonged wound care for 6 months postresection. Variables that may be associated with wound complications were evaluated using logistic regression for multivariate analysis. Receiver operative curve (ROC) analysis was used to assess the early morning blood glucose level that best was associated postoperative wound complications.After controlling for potentially relevant confounding variables such as patient comorbidities, tumor size, and location, lower extremity soft tissue sarcomas (p = 0.002, odds ratio [OR], 6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97-20.84) and elevated POD 1 early morning blood sugars (p0.001; OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.04-1.11) were associated with increased wound complications postoperatively. ROC analysis revealed that early morning POD 1 blood glucose of127 mg/dL was associated with postoperative wound complications with a sensitivity of 89% (area under the curve 0.898, p0.001). Median POD 1 early morning blood glucose in patients without diabetes was 118 mg/dL and 153 mg/dL in patients with diabetes (p = 0.023). However, with the numbers available, there was no increase in wound complications in patients with diabetes compared with those without it.Our study provides preliminary information suggesting that POD 1 early morning blood glucose in patients with soft tissue sarcomas may be associated with a slightly increased risk of postoperative wound complications. An early morning blood glucose of127 mg/dL may be a threshold associated with this outcome. Although patients with diabetes had higher POD 1 early morning blood glucose levels, diabetes itself was not associated with the development of wound complications. We cannot conclude that better glycemic control will reduce wound complications in patients who receive preoperative radiation, but our data suggest this should be further studied in a larger, prospective study.Level III, therapeutic study.

Angiomatosis of the breast is very rare. The presentations are including breast mass, skin discoloration and breast enlargement that mimic to angiosarcoma. The imaging could suggest non-specific vascular tumors. The histology should be obtained for the certain diagnosis. Surgical excision is the standard treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first case that preoperative radiation is given. Currently, radiation is occasionally used in benign condition. This case shows the successful result of preoperative radiation for achieving breast conserving surgery in large angiomatosis of the breast.

Purpose Evidence for external beam radiation therapy (RT) as part of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is limited. Preoperative RT is the subject of a current randomized trial, but the results will not be available for many years. In the meantime, many practitioners use preoperative RT for RPS, and although this approach is used in practice, there are no radiation treatment guidelines. An international expert panel was convened to develop consensus treatment guidelines for preoperative RT for RPS. Methods and Materials An expert panel of 15 academic radiation oncologists who specialize in the treatment of sarcoma was assembled. A systematic review of reports related to RT for RPS, RT for extremity sarcoma, and RT-related toxicities for organs at risk was performed. Due to the paucity of high-quality published data on the subject of RT for RPS, consensus recommendations were based largely on expert opinion derived from clinical experience and extrapolation of relevant published reports. It is intended that these clinical practice guidelines be updated as pertinent data become available. Results Treatment guidelines for preoperative RT for RPS are presented. Conclusions An international panel of radiation oncologists who specialize in sarcoma reached consensus guidelines for preoperative RT for RPS. Many of the recommendations are based on expert opinion because of the absence of higher level evidence and, thus, are best regarded as preliminary. We emphasize that the role of preoperative RT for RPS has not been proven, and we await data from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study of preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for patients with RPS. Further data are also anticipated pertaining to normal tissue dose constraints, particularly for bowel tolerance. Nonetheless, as we await these data, the guidelines herein can be used to establish treatment uniformity to aid future assessments of efficacy and toxicity.

Introduction Heterotopic ossification (HO) involves the formation of lamellar bone in nonosseous tissue. For HO, radiotherapy has been shown to be an effective prophylactic modality. Objective To compare HO outcomes following radiotherapy and to investigate the comparative efficacy of preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy. Methods A systematic search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included patients who were prescribed prophylactic radiation for whom relevant HO progression outcomes were reported. Results From a literature search of 528 articles, 12 RCTs were included. There was a statistically significant reduction in HO prevalence with multiple as opposed to single fraction radiotherapy ( p =0.04), however there was no statistically significant difference when examining HO progression ( p =0.34). There was no statistically significant difference in HO progression when comparing a biologically effective radiation dose (BED) of >2500cGy versus ⩽2500cGy ( p =0.28). As well, no statistically significant difference existed in HO progression between postoperative versus preoperative radiation ( p =0.43). Conclusion There was no difference between postoperative or preoperative radiotherapy in preventing HO progression. There seems to be no relationship between BED greater or less than 2500cGy and the efficacy of HO prophylaxis. Multiple fractions seem to be more effective than single fraction radiotherapy in preventing HO progression.

There is overlap in the clinical presentation of benign soft tissue tumors and soft tissue sarcomas. A preoperative sarcoma diagnosis would allow for consideration for neoadjuvant therapy, including preoperative radiation, as well as optimal surgical treatment planning, and patient counseling. Image guided core needle biopsy is a low morbidity, cost-effective, highly accurate approach for obtaining a definitive pathologic diagnosis. Any biopsy approach should minimize the potential for tumor seeding of otherwise uninvolved anatomic structures.

Objective: Lymph node yield in therapeutic neck dissection is clinically significant and incompletely studied. We quantified node yield based on extent of neck dissection and presence of preoperative radiation. We also evaluated factors affecting incidence of extracapsular spread (ECS). Methods: Retrospective review of 499 patients undergoing therapeutic neck dissection; 414 patients met inclusion criteria and were divided into 2 groups: neck dissection alone or before radiation (surgery first: 280 patients; 385 dissections) and primary radiation before surgery (radiation first: 134 patients; 157 dissections). Node yield relative to levels dissected and incidence of ECS were examined. Results: Dissection-specific node yield was greater in the surgery first group for dissection of levels I-V (31.1 ± 16.7 vs 24.0 ± 14.7, P < .001) and levels II-V (26.7 ± 14.4 vs 21.1 ± 10.7). Extracapsular spread incidence was 32.1% (98/305) in the surgery first group and 15.4% (23/149) in the radiation first group ( P < .001). Conclusion: This study clarifies anticipated node yield based on number of levels dissected and presence of preoperative radiation. Node yield and incidence of ECS are lower in patients undergoing preoperative radiation.

Purpose To evaluate visual and surgical outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes with a history of iodine-125 (I125) brachytherapy for ocular melanoma. Setting Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and the Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA. Design Retrospective case series. Methods Patients with ocular melanoma treated by I125 brachytherapy who subsequently had cataract surgery were evaluated. The recorded data included tumor size, location, preoperative ocular comorbidities, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), operative complications, and brachytherapy-related maculopathy before and after surgery. Results Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients were included. The mean age at the time of cataract surgery was 66.1 years. The median follow-up was 53.5 months. There were no intraoperative complications. Eighteen eyes (56.3%) had a history of preoperative radiation retinopathy, 10 involving the macula. Between 2 weeks and 4 weeks postoperatively, 22 eyes (68.8%) had an improvement in CDVA (≥2 lines). Seven of 10 eyes that failed to improve had radiation maculopathy. By the last follow-up examination, 13 eyes (40.6%) had improved CDVA, 9 eyes (28.1%) were worse (≥2 lines), and 10 eyes (31.3%) were unchanged (within ±1 line). Of 15 eyes that lost CDVA gains achieved between 2 weeks and 4 weeks postoperatively, 9 eyes had new-onset or worsening maculopathy. Cataract surgery had no effect on local tumor control or distant metastasis. Conclusions Cataract surgery after I125 brachytherapy for ocular melanoma improved CDVA in most eyes during the immediate postoperative period. Gains were often lost with further follow-up. Progression of radiation maculopathy was primarily responsible for subsequent visual decline.

Primary leiomyosarcomas of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are rare tumors with complex anatomical relationships. Surgical resection remains the primary approach for management, with selective use of preoperative radiation and chemotherapy. Given the propensity for local invasion of these tumors, radical resection of surrounding structures is often required. Herein we describe the presentation, work-up, operative management, and outcomes of these lesions through the case of a patient with a tumor involving the middle segment of the IVC. Given the extent of involvement, IVC resection with en bloc right nephrectomy, right adrenalectomy, and partial left renal vein resection was performed with vascular reconstruction using a prosthetic graft. With appropriate preoperative planning and a well-coordinated multidisciplinary approach, aggressive surgical resection can be safely performed and patients can benefit from favorable long-term survival.

Background There is a general consensus among reconstructive surgeons that preoperative radiotherapy is associated with a higher risk of flap failure and complications in head and neck surgery. Opinion is also divided regarding the effects of radiation dose on free flap outcomes and timing of preoperative radiation to minimize adverse outcomes. Our meta-analysis will attempt to address these issues. Method A systematic review of the literature was conducted in concordance to PRISMA protocol. Data were combined using STATA 12 and Open Meta-Analyst software programmes. Results Twenty-four studies were included comparing 2842 flaps performed in irradiated fields and 3491 flaps performed in non-irradiated fields. Meta-analysis yielded statistically significant risk ratios for flap failure (RR 1.48, P = 0.004), complications (RR 1.84, P 60 Gy radiation had a non-statistically significant higher risk of flap failure (RR 1.61, P = 0.145). Conclusion Preoperative radiation is associated with a statistically significant increased risk of flap complications, failure and fistula. Preoperative radiation in excess of 60 Gy after radiotherapy represents a potential risk factor for increased flap loss and should be avoided where possible.

This study evaluates the anorectal and genitourinary function of patients treated by preoperative short-term radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery and surgery alone for rectal cancer.For this study, a total of 613 patients, who were identified from a prospective rectal cancer database, underwent anterior resection of the rectum between October 2001 and December 2007. Standardized questionnaires were used to determine fecal incontinence, urinary, and sexual function. Relevant clinical variables were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Independent predictors of functional outcome were identified by a binary logistic regression analysis.The data of 263 (43 %) patients were available for analysis. On multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant RT (P 0.01) and low anterior resection (LAR) (P = 0.049) were associated with fecal incontinence. In univariate analysis, fecal incontinence was linked to preoperative neoadjuvant treatment (RT and/or CRT vs. LAR) (P 0.01). The hazard ratio for developing fecal incontinence was 3.3 (1.6-6.8) for patients who received RT. One hundred twenty-five patients (51.2 %) experienced urinary incontinence following surgery, the majority of whom were female (P 0.01). On univariate analysis, male sexual function was associated with age (P 0.01), ASA class (P = 0.01) and LAR (P = 0.01).Multimodal therapy of low rectal cancer increases the incidence of fecal incontinence and negatively affects sexual function. The potential benefits of RT or CRT need to be balanced against the risk of increased bowel dysfunction when determining the appropriate treatment for individual patients with rectal cancer.

Purpose The investigators hypothesized that low-dose hyperfractionated radiation would impair mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) in a murine mandibular model. Materials and Methods Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent fractionated radiation (30 Gy) of the left mandible. After a 2-week recovery period, an external frame distractor was applied and gradual distraction of the mandible was performed. Tissue was harvested after a 28-day consolidation period. Gross, radiologic, and histologic evaluations were undertaken. Control animals underwent surgery for an identical time frame without preoperative radiation. Results Animals subjected to preoperative radiation (n = 10) showed suboptimal bone formation, including bone atrophy, incomplete bridging of the distraction gap, and gross bony defects or nonunion, compared with controls (n = 10). Although physical lengthening was achieved, irradiation consistently led to a detrimental effect on the normal process of DO. Conclusion This set of experiments establishes a valuable rodent model to evaluate the effects of radiation on DO and may help to formulate strategies to optimize DO before it is widely applied in oncologic reconstruction.

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare cancers. They should be managed by a multidisciplinary team with experience caring for these diverse malignancies. Local control is frequently achieved with a combination of radiation therapy and surgery. This article reviews the data supporting the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in the care of patients with soft tissue sarcoma and describes the side effects of surgery and radiation therapy. Preoperative radiation therapy increases the risk of wound complication from surgery, but has fewer long-term side effects than postoperative radiation therapy. The timing of radiation therapy can be tailored to each patient.

Background and Objectives Administration of preoperative radiotherapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma improves local control, while allowing for a more conservative surgical resection. During radiation treatment tumor size typically decreases or remains constant. In a subset of patients, however, a size increase in the tumor occurs. Our goal was to investigate the prognosis of patients who had a size increase of at least 20% over the course of preoperative radiotherapy versus those who did not. Methods This retrospective study evaluated 70 patients treated for localized primary STS of the extremities between January 2000 and December 2008. Kaplan–Meier curves for disease-specific and metastasis-free survival were calculated for both groups. Results Sixty-one patients had stable or decrease local tumor size following preoperative radiotherapy and nine patients had an increase of at least 20% in tumor size. There were no statistically significant differences found in disease-specific survival and metastasis-free survival (Gray's test, P = 0.93 and P = 0.68, respectively) among the two groups. Conclusion Our results indicate that a 20% increase in tumor size following preoperative radiotherapy did not result in a worse outcome for patients when compared to those who had stable or decrease local tumor size following preoperative radiotherapy. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013;107:723–727. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Purpose To investigate the toxicity of nelfinavir, administered during preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Material and methods Twelve patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy to 50.4 Gy combined with capecitabine 825 mg/m2 BID. Three dose levels (DL) of nelfinavir were tested: 750 mg BID (DL1), 1250 mg BID (DL2) and an intermediate level of 1000 mg BID (DL3). Surgery was performed between 8 and 10 weeks after completion of CRT. Primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), defined as any grade 3 or higher non-hematological or grade 4 or higher hematological toxicity. Results Eleven patients could be analyzed: 5 were treated in DL1, 3 in DL2 and 3 in DL3. The first 3 patients in DL1 did not develop a DLT. In DL2 one patient developed gr 3 diarrhea, 1 patient had gr 3 transaminase elevation and 1 patient had a gr 3 cholangitis with unknown cause. An intermediate dose level was tested in DL3. In this group 2 patients developed gr 3 diarrhea and 1 patient gr 3 transaminase elevation and gr 4 post-operative wound complication. Three patients achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). Conclusions Nelfinavir 750 mg BID was defined as the recommended phase II dose in combination with capecitabine and 50.4 Gy pre-operative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. First tumor response evaluations are promising, but a further phase II study is needed to get more information about efficacy of this treatment regimen.

Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the expression of MMP-1 and TIMP-1 in irradiated mandibles during distraction osteogenesis. Study Design Rabbits in the experimental group received preoperative radiation of 9 Gy for 5 fractions. After 1 month, all rabbits underwent osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis with 7 days of latency. Three rabbits in the control and experimental groups were killed at days 7, 12, 18, and 25. Specimens were subjected to immunohistochemical examination and real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. Results At day 7, expression of MMP-1 and TIMP-1 was significantly suppressed in the radiotherapy group in contrast to the control group. At day 12, expression of MMP-1 was significantly higher in the control group. At day 18, expression of MMP-1 and TIMP-1 was significantly higher in the control than in the radiotherapy group. Conclusions Radiotherapy changes the expression pattern of MMP-1 and TIMP-1.

Partial breast irradiation, treatment focused only on the surgical bed plus a variable margin, has evolved as an ultra-convenient alternative to whole breast irradiation for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer. A number of techniques are available for treatment delivery, ranging from a single intraoperative treatment to one week of twice daily treatments postoperatively. However, concerns of suboptimal cosmetic outcomes have been raised with the highly accessible external-beam technique and linked to large postoperative target volumes. Preoperative radiation, delivered prior to surgical resection, is under investigation as an alternative approach utilizing in situ targeting of a small intact breast tumor to identify the highest-risk regions and reduce the volume of uninvolved breast tissue receiving high radiation doses. Several commonly utilized technologies can be used to deliver preoperative radiation and early efficacy and toxicity reports for this treatment approach are promising. The rationale, treatment delivery techniques, available outcomes data, and ongoing investigations for preoperative partial breast irradiation are described in further depth in the accompanying chapter.

This review explores the current available literature regarding the role of neoadjuvant therapy for upper locally advanced rectal cancers (≥10 cm-15 cm). Although there is a paucity of data evaluating the outcomes of preoperative chemoradiation for upper rectal cancers the authors suggest that T3N0 tumors will not likely benefit from radiation and that treatment of T4N0 should be individualized.

Objective: To evaluate longitudinal changes in parotid volumes and saliva production over 2 years after 30 Gy irradiation. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 15 assessable patients treated for advanced oral cancer. Eligibility criteria were a pathologic diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, preoperative radiation therapy with a total dose of 30 Gy delivered in 15 fractions, and the availability of longitudinal data of morphological assessments by computed tomography and functional assessments with the Saxon test spanning 2 years after radiation therapy. In the Saxon test, saliva production was measured by weighing a folded sterile gauze pad before and after chewing; the low-normal value is 2 g/2 min. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons was used to determine the longitudinal changes. Results: The normalized ipsilateral parotid volumes 2 weeks and 6-, 12- and 24 months after radiation therapy were found to be 72.5, 63.7, 66.9 and 78.1%, respectively; the normalized contralateral volumes were 69.8, 64.6, 72.2 and 82.0%, respectively. The bilateral parotid volumes were significantly decreased after radiation therapy (P , 0.01). The nadir appeared at 6 months post-radiation therapy and the volumes substantially recuperated 24 months after radiation therapy (P , 0.01). Mean saliva production before radiation therapy was 3.7 g; the longitudinal changes after radiation therapy were 31.3, 38.0, 43.3 and 69.6%, respectively. Substantial recuperation of saliva production was observed 24 months after radiation therapy (P ¼ 0.01). Conclusions: Although parotid volumes and saliva production were decreased after 30 Gy irradiation, we observed the recuperation of morphological and functional changes in the parotid glands 2 years after radiation therapy.

Objective: Preoperative (preop) chemoradiation therapy improves local control and reduces toxicity for stage II/III rectal cancer better than postoperative (postop) chemoradiation therapy. We examined the temporal and regional variations in the use of preop radiotherapy (RT) across the United States. Methods: Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 2005 who had a primary site resection were identified from the SEER database. The rate of preop RT use over time was plotted. Regression models were used to analyze regional variations. Results: From 1998 to 2005, an increase of 1.7 in the ratio of preop RT/postoperative RT was noted, whereas the ratio of RT/no RT increased only by 0.7. The ratio of preop RT/postop RT increased from 0.5 to 1 in 5 years (1998-2003) but from I to 1.5 in 2 years (2003-2005). Multivariate regression analysis showed: patients with stage II disease were more likely than those with stage III disease, younger patients were more likely than older patients, and males were more likely than females to receive preop RT. Whites were more likely to receive preop RT than nonwhites for stage III disease only. Patients treated in the San Francisco region, Hawaii, New Mexico, Seattle, and Los Angeles were more likely to receive preop RT than were patients in the Connecticut, Detroit, Iowa, Utah, Atlanta, and San Jose/Monterey regions. Conclusions: The increasing use of preop RT varies across US regions and patient subgroups. Further studies should evaluate potentially modifiable factors contributing to these variations.

There is considerable debate on the optimum approach to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. This review of major published studies of short-course preoperative radiation and the more conventional approach of long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation was undertaken in an effort to understand the potential advantages and disadvantages of each of these approaches. Studies were evaluated with regard to patient selection, clinical outcomes, and toxicities. Short-course preoperative radiation has shown a clear advantage over surgery alone in reducing local recurrence rates and improving survival of patients with rectal cancer. However, studies using short-course preoperative treatment have included a significant number of early (30%; Stage I/II) and more proximal cancers yet appear to have higher positive margin rates, higher abdominoperineal resection rates, and lower aggregate survival than patients treated with long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Although long-course preoperative chemoradiation is associated with higher rates of reversible acute toxicity, there appears to be more significant and a higher rate of late gastrointestinal toxicity observed in short-course preoperative radiation studies. Patient convenience and lower cost of treatment, however, can be a significant advantage in using a short-course treatment schedule. Selective utilization of either of these approaches should be based on extent of disease and goals of treatment. Patients with distal cancers or more advanced disease (T3/T4) appear to have better outcomes with neoadjuvant chemoradiation, especially where downstaging of disease is critical for more complete surgical resection and sphincter preservation.

When the surgeon analyzes the ongoing literature on the evidence of the neoadjuvant approaches to rectal cancer finds a true paradox: from one side they seem to offer a relative less relevant contribute through the time, in fact whereas in the Swedish trial preoperative radiation yielded a significant improvement of local control and survival, after the introduction of TME the contribution of preoperative chemoradiation is relegate to local control with no or poor influence on survival, even if the absolute 5-year survival rate moved from 40% of the ?70 to 60-65% of the latest years1-3. From other side the growing evidence of an incidence of pCR approaching to 30%4, seems to identify a subset of patients with more favorable prognosis to neoadjuvant treatments5-6. Furthermore, the overall evidence that 30- 35% of rectal cancer patients treated with multimodality therapy still die from cancer namely by distant metastases in spite of the 4-8 % of absolute benefit of adjuvant 5Fu based adjuvant chemotherapy7, seems to vanish the efforts of the further optimization of the local treatments (surgery and radiotherapy) and of the ongoing modality of delivery the chemotherapeutic agents. We would like to address the main evidences from the literature and the main uncertainties that the surgeon could face to propose a combined treatment to his rectal cancer patient.

Purpose: The aim of every breast cancer therapy is to treat the patients as respectful as possible without compromising the safety as indicated by the oncological criteria. If breast-preserving surgery is not possible, different surgical procedures of breast reconstruction after mastectomy are available. In principle, reconstruction can be done at the same time as the mastectomy as a primary reconstruction. It can also be done at a later stage as a secondary reconstruction. We also analysed whether the timepoint of surgery, the surgical technique and the preoperative radiation therapy have an influence on the local recurrence risk, the cosmetic outcome and the quality of life. Material and Methods: We compared local recurrence in a total of 123 breast cancer survivors treated either with mastectomy or mastectomy with primary reconstruction. After surgery the patients filled out a questionnaire that measured the quality of life at different timepoints. Tumor stage and age was recorded in all patients. Results: Based on the analysis of our data coenesthesia and the feeling of being more attractive had improved, however a substantial improvement of quality of life could not be found. The analysis also showed that the quality of treatment and therefore the quality of life could be improved if breast cancer patients were treated in special breast care centers. Conclusion: If oncological-surgical principles are adhered to, primary reconstruction with implants or autotissue has no negative influence on the recurrence risk, the illness-free interval and the overall survival in breast cancer patients. A knowledge of reconstructive surgery of the female breast and critical self-assessment of the surgeon forms the basis for high-quality results after a multimodal therapy. In cases where an adjuvant radiation therapy is necessary, primary reconstruction should not be done at once because of the actinogenic reaction. In such cases an autologous reconstruction alone or in combination with implants is recommended for breast rebuilding.

Background: The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) is a 3-arm study that includes two multicenter randomized clinical trials designed to compare the effectiveness of brachytherapy to enucleation for treatment of medium-size choroidal melanomas, and the effectiveness of enucleation with and without preoperative external-beam radiotherapy for large choroidal melanomas. The third arm is an observational study of small choroidal melanomas. Patient accrual ran from 1987 to 1998. Methods: A review of COMS published reports was conducted. Results: There is no difference in 5-year all-cause mortality for large- and medium-size choroidal melanomas with COMS-designated treatments. Preoperative radiation for large choroidal melanomas does not improve survival. The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of choroidal melanoma is excellent. Conclusions: Data from the trials are still being collected and analyzed, but primary outcomes will unlikely change significantly in the future. Similar rates of mortality after treatment with enucleation and brachytherapy shift the emphasis of selection of therapy to secondary outcomes such as preservation of vision. The findings highlight the need to better understand the biological mechanisms and timing of hematogenous dissemination to achieve an appreciable impact on choroidal melanoma survival.