Search

Introduction and Objectives: There are no clinical data on the efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography-guided PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock. The current study sought to evaluate the impact of intravascular imaging-guided PCI in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock., Methods: Among a total of 28 732 patients from the nationwide pooled registry of KAMIR-NIH (November, 2011 to December, 2015) and KAMIR-V (January, 2016 to June, 2020), we selected a total of 1833 patients (6.4%) with AMI and cardiogenic shock who underwent PCI of the culprit vessel. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1 year, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis., Results: Among the study population, 375 patients (20.5%) underwent intravascular imaging-guided PCI and 1458 patients (79.5%) underwent angiography-guided PCI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of 1-year MACE than angiography-guided PCI (19.5% vs 28.2%; HR, 0.59; 95%CI, 0.45-0.77; P<.001), mainly driven by a lower risk of cardiac death (13.7% vs 24.0%; adjusted HR, 0.53; 95%CI, 0.39-0.72; P<.001). These results were consistent in propensity score matching (HR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.46-0.99), inverse probability weighting (HR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.45-0.83), and Bayesian analysis (Odds ratio, 0.66, 95% credible interval, 0.49-0.88)., Conclusions: In AMI patients with cardiogenic shock, intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of MACE at 1-year than angiography-guided PCI, mainly driven by the lower risk of cardiac death., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The efficacy of intracoronary (IC) antithrombotic therapy, which may best prevent the no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), remains unclear. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of different IC antithrombotic agents., Materials and Methods: This systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared IC fibrinolytic agents (recombinant tissue plasminogen activators [rtPAs] and non-rtPAs) or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (small molecules and monoclonal antibodies) with placebo by searching the relevant studies published before September 21, 2022. Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models., Results: Twenty-five RCTs with 4546 patients were included. Non-rtPAs and small molecules were significantly more effective in achieving thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow than placebo (odds ratio [OR] 2.28, 95 % credible intervals [CrI] 1.24-4.13; OR 2.06, 95 % CrI 1.17-3.46). Moreover, these agents' efficacy was observed in other microcirculation-related outcomes, including TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 3, complete ST-segment resolution, and corrected TIMI frame counts. Within 6 months, small molecules were associated with both an improved left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 3.90, 95 % CrI 0.48-7.46) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) reduction (OR 0.36, 95 % CrI 0.20-0.61). Non-rtPAs demonstrated a reduced MACE incidence within 6 months (OR 0.51, 95 % CrI 0.31-0.81). The results were consistent in the subgroup with a total ischemic time > 6 h. No significant differences in mortality or bleeding events were observed., Conclusions: IC non-rtPAs and small molecules may be effective for adjunctive therapy to PCI, particularly in patients with longer ischemia periods., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The optimal duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES), especially recently developed polymer-free DESs, is unknown. This study examined the efficacy and safety of 3- versus 6-month DAPT in patients implanted with Coroflex ISAR polymer-free DESs., Methods: Between May 2015 and August 2020, 488 patients who underwent Coroflex ISAR stent implantation were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to the 3-month (n=244) or 6-month (n=244) DAPT group., Results: At 1 year, the primary endpoint (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] type 2-5 bleeding) occurred in 9 (3.7%) patients in the 3-month DAPT group and in 7 (2.9%) patients in the 6-month DAPT group (hazard ratio 1.31; P=.60). There was no difference between the 3- and 6-month DAPT groups in either BARC type 2-5 bleeding (1.6% vs 0.8%; hazard ratio 2.00; P=.42) or any bleeding (2.9% vs 3.3%; hazard ratio 0.87; P=.80)., Conclusion: Compared with 6 months of DAPT, 3 months of DAPT did not increase the risk of primary endpoint 1 year after Coroflex ISAR stent implantation, although it should be noted that the trial has limited power to see differences due to low event rate and low recruitment rate.

Public reporting is a way to promote quality of healthcare. However, evidence supporting improved quality of care using public reporting in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is disputed. This study aims to describe the impact of public reporting of AMI care on hospital quality improvement in Korea. Patients with AMI admitted to the emergency room with ICD-10 codes of I21.0 to I21.9 as the primary or secondary diagnosis were identified from the national health insurance claims data (2007-2012). Between 2007 and 2012, 43,240/83,378 (51.9%) patients manifested ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Timely reperfusion rate increased (β = 2.78, p = 0.001). The mortality rate of STEMI patients was not changed (β = -0.0098, p = 0.384) but that of NSTEMI patients decreased (β = -0.465, p = 0.001). Public reporting has a substantial impact on the process indicators of AMI in Korea because of the increased reperfusion rate. However, the outcome indicators such as mortality did not significantly change, suggesting that public reporting did not necessarily improve the quality of care.

Background: Initial left ventricular (LV) systolic function is a main determinant of clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study was performed to investigate whether AMI patients have different prognostic factors according to their baseline LV systolic function., Methods: A total of 12,988 patients with AMI from a nationwide database were analyzed. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within 12months of AMI, including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization, were assessed., Results: Patients were stratified into two groups according to LV ejection fraction (LVEF): those with LVEF<40% and those with LVEF≥40%. Patients with LVEF<40% (n=1962, 15.1%) were older and had more unfavorable cardiovascular risk factors than those with LVEF≥40% (n=11,026, 84.9%). The rate of MACE was higher in patients with LVEF<40% than in those with LVEF≥40% (26.8% vs 11.4%, p<0.001). Independent predictors of 12-month MACEs in patients with LVEF≥40% were history of MI, high Killip stage, three-vessel disease, and lower renal function, which are already known as risk factors. However, diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio [HR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-2.40; p=0.008), and the use of rennin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95; p=0.029) were independent factors for 12-month MACE in patients with LVEF <40%., Conclusions: Prognostic factors determining 12-month MACE after AMI are different according to LVEF. Management following AMI should be tailored according to their LV systolic function., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the Effects of Postconditioning on Myocardial Reperfusion in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (POST) trial, ischemic postconditioning failed to improve myocardial reperfusion. However, long-term effects of ischemic postconditioning on clinical outcomes are not known in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction., Methods: A total of 700 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly assigned to the postconditioning group or the conventional primary PCI group in a 1:1 ratio. Postconditioning was performed immediately after restoration of coronary flow by balloon occlusion 4 times for 1 minute. Complete follow-up data for major clinical events at 1 year were available in 695 patients (99.3%), and analyses were done by the intention to treat principle. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, severe heart failure, or stent thrombosis at 1 year., Results: At 1 year, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, severe heart failure, or stent thrombosis occurred in 21 patients (6.1%) in the postconditioning group and 16 patients (4.6%) in the conventional PCI group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% CI 0.69-2.53, P = .40). The risk of death (4.9% vs 3.7%, HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.64-2.71, P = .46), heart failure (2.6% vs 2.3%, HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.44-2.94, P = .80), and stent thrombosis (2.3% vs 1.7%, HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.46-3.85, P = .59) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups., Conclusions: Ischemic postconditioning does not seem to improve the 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Limited data are available regarding the prognostic value of the brachial-ankle index (ABI) in patients with a history of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. This study sought to determine the relationship between the ABI and coronary events in patients with DES., Methods: A total of 322 patients who underwent both DES implantation and ABI measurement during initial hospitalization were reviewed. Cardiovascular events, including cardiac death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization, were assessed., Results: During the mean follow-up period of 298 ± 58 days, there were 32 cases of cardiovascular events (9.9%). The patients with a lower ABI had more events (2.8% in the highest tertile versus 10.3% in the middle tertile versus 16.8% in the lowest tertile, p = 0.001). According to the multiple Cox regression analysis, the ABI was independently associated with clinical events (the lowest tertile versus the highest tertile of ABI, hazard ratio: 6.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.37-29.32, p=0.018). In addition, the cumulative event rate according to the ABI tertile differed significantly in the Kaplan-Meier curves (log-rank p=0.009), whereas the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed a sensitivity and specificity for predicting cardiovascular events of 62.5% and 66.2%, respectively, with an ABI of 1.057 as the best cut-off value., Conclusions: A lower ABI is associated with poorer cardiovascular outcomes in patients with DES implantation. As a simple and non-invasive parameter, the ABI has the benefit of predicting future cardiovascular events in this population.

This study was conducted to investigate the prognostic value of heart block among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with drug-eluting stents. A total of 13,862 patients with AMI, registered in the nation-wide AMI database from January 2005 to June 2013, were analyzed. Second- (Mobitz type I or II) and third-degree atrioventricular block were considered as heart block in this study. Thirty-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including all causes of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and revascularization were evaluated. Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of drug-eluting stent was performed in 89.8% of the patients. Heart block occurred in 378 patients (2.7%). Thirty-day MACE occurred in 1,144 patients (8.2%). Patients with heart block showed worse clinical parameters at initial admission, and the presence of heart block was associated with 30-day MACE in univariate analyses. However, the prognostic impact of heart block was not significant after adjustment of potential confounders (p = 0.489). Among patients with heart block, patients with a culprit in the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery had worse clinical outcomes than those of patients with a culprit in the left circumflex or right coronary artery. LAD culprit was a significant risk factor for 30-day MACE even after controlling for confounders (odds ratio 5.28, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 22.81, p = 0.026). In conclusion, despite differences in clinical parameters at the initial admission, heart block was not an independent risk factor for 30-day MACE in adjusted analyses. However, a LAD culprit was an independent risk factor for 30-day MACE among patients with heart block., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ischemic postconditioning has been reported to reduce infarct size in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. However, cardioprotective effects of postconditioning have not been demonstrated in a large-scale trial., Methods and Results: We performed a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point trial. A total of 700 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction within 12 hours after symptom onset were randomly assigned to the postconditioning group or to the conventional primary PCI group in a 1:1 ratio. Postconditioning was performed immediately after restoration of coronary flow as follows: The angioplasty balloon was positioned at the culprit lesion and inflated 4 times for 1 minute with low-pressure (<6 atm) inflations, each separated by 1 minute of deflation. The primary end point was complete ST-segment resolution (percentage resolution of ST-segment elevation >70%) measured at 30 minutes after PCI. Complete ST-segment resolution occurred in 40.5% of patients in the postconditioning group and 41.5% of patients in the conventional PCI group (absolute difference, -1.0%; 95% confidence interval, -8.4 to 6.4; P=0.79). The rate of myocardial blush grade of 0 or 1 and the rate of major adverse cardiac events (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, severe heart failure, or stent thrombosis) at 30 days did not differ significantly between the postconditioning group and the conventional PCI group (17.2% versus 22.4% [P=0.20] and 4.3% versus 3.7% [P=0.70], respectively)., Conclusion: Ischemic postconditioning did not improve myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI with current standard practice.

Background: Protection of distal embolization by balloon occlusion and thrombus aspiration has not improved microvascular circulation nor decreased myocardial injury during primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in randomized trials. In a prospective randomized trial, we investigated the mechanism of the poor effect of distal protection and thrombus aspiration (DP-TA) in 126 patients with STEMI., Methods: Patients with first-diagnosed STEMI were randomly assigned to DP-TA pretreatment or conventional PCI (c-PCI). Primary endpoint was reduced left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) measured by MRI at post-PCI and 6 months after PCI. Secondary end points were infarct ratio (infarct size to entire LV size) by delayed enhancement (DE), area at risk (AAR) ratio (AAR to entire LV size) by T2 high signal, microvascular occlusion index (MVO) ratio (MVO to entire LV size) by DE, and myocardial salvage index (MSI: (AAR--infarct size)*100/AAR) using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 3 days after PCI., Results: Baseline characteristics of the patients including cardiovascular risk factors and lesion characteristics were similar between the two groups. DT-PA failed to improve LV remodeling at 6 months (LVEDV 140 ± 39 vs 133 ± 37 in c-PCI group, p=0.418). Infarct ratio, AAR ratio and MSI were not statistically different between DP-TA group and c-PCI group. However, MVO ratio was significantly larger in DP-TA group than in c-PCI group (2.4 ± 2.7 vs 1.1 ± 1.9, p=0.045)., Conclusion: DP-TA was potentially hazardous in primary PCI for STEMI by increasing MVO. DP-TA should not be used in STEMI., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The zotarolimus-eluting stent has shown larger in-stent late lumen loss compared to sirolimus-eluting stents in previous studies. However, this has not been thoroughly evaluated in ST elevation myocardial infarction., Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial evaluating angiographic outcomes in patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction, treated with zotarolimus-eluting stents or sirolimus-eluting stents. From March 2007 to February 2009, 122 patients were randomized to zotarolimus-eluting stents or sirolimus-eluting stents in a 1:1 fashion. The primary endpoint was 9-month in-stent late lumen loss confirmed by coronary angiography, and secondary endpoints were percent diameter stenosis, binary restenosis rate, major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization), and late-acquired incomplete stent apposition., Results: Angiographic in-stent late lumen loss was significantly higher in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group compared to the sirolimus-eluting stent group ((0.49 ± 0.65) mm vs. (0.10 ± 0.46) mm, P = 0.001). Percent diameter stenosis at 9-month follow-up was also larger in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group ((30.0 ± 17.9)% vs. (17.6 ± 14.0)%, P < 0.001). In-segment analysis showed similar findings. There were no significant differences in binary restenosis rate, major adverse cardiac events, and late-acquired incomplete stent apposition., Conclusions: Compared to sirolimus-eluting stents, the zotarolimus-eluting stent is associated with significantly higher in-stent late lumen loss at 9-month angiographic follow-up in the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction. Although there was no significant difference in 1-year clinical outcomes, the clinical implication of increased late lumen loss should be further studied.

Background: We evaluated the clinical and angiographic outcomes of silicon carbide-coated cobalt chromium PROKinetic bare-metal stent in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: Patients with acute STEMI (2.75-5.00 mm vessels; lesion length ≤30 mm by visual estimation) were treated with PRO-Kinetic stents at 5 centers in Korea. The primary endpoint was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, new myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6-month follow-up. Follow-up angiography was recommended after the completion of the 6-month clinical followup., Results: A total of 64 patients (56.6 ± 12.9 years old, 56 male) were enrolled in the study. Procedural success was achieved in 100% of the lesions. The mean stent size was 3.51 ± 0.67 mm and the mean stent length was 20.3 ± 4.4 mm. There was 1 case of in-hospital death due to cardiac tamponade. During the 6-month clinical follow-up, 4 patients (6.3%) received TLR. Therefore, the total rate of MACE was 7.8%. Angiographic follow-up data were available for 42 patients (65.6%) and the in-stent late lumen loss was 1.02 ± 0.62 mm and in-segment late lumen loss was 0.99 ± 0.64 mm. Binary restenosis occurred in 53% of reference vessel diameters (RVDs) ≤3.0 mm, 25% of RVDs between 3.0 and 3.5 mm, and 0% of RVDs >3.5 mm (P=.006)., Conclusions: The use of the PRO-Kinetic stent seems to be safe and feasible in primary PCI for acute STEMI, and shows favorable clinical and angiographic outcomes in large (>3.0 mm) coronary arteries, but not in small arteries.

Background: After an acute myocardial infarction, the early restoration of coronary blood flow is mandatory for reducing infarct size. However, the process of reperfusion itself may also cause irreversible myocardial injury and contribute to the final infarct size. Recent animal studies have suggested that erythropoietin could protect the myocardium when administered after the onset of reperfusion. We investigated whether the administration of erythropoietin at the time of PCI would limit the size of the infarct during acute myocardial infarction by analysis of MRI and cardiac enzymes in this pilot study., Methods: We randomly assigned 57 patients with acute, anterior wall ST-elevation myocardial infarction who were presented within 12h after the onset of chest pain to one group which was given an intravenous bolus of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO, 50 U/kg) immediately before undergoing PCI or the control group without the IV treatment before PCI. Infarct size was assessed by measuring the release of cardiac enzymes (CK, CK-MB) and by performing MRI on day 4 after infarction., Results: The injection of erythropoietin did not result in thrombotic or hypertensive complications. The release of cardiac enzyme was not different between two groups. On day 4, the absolute infarct volume of the area of hyperenhancement on MRI did not differ between two groups (EPO group 52.4 ± 23.6 cm(3) vs. control group 54.8 ± 28.6 cm(3), p=0.74). Two groups did not differ in the percentage of total infarct volume over left ventricle volume (EPO group 34.4 ± 11.7% vs. 37.0 ± 13.8%, p=0.50)., Conclusions: Intravenous administration of erythropoietin was safe and was not associated with thrombotic or hypertensive side effects. However, it did not reduce the infarct size when assessed by MRI and cardiac enzyme. Further studies about the dose or routes of administration of EPO are needed (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00882466)., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Significant microvascular obstruction (MVO) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may suggest severe myocardial damage. The predictive value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (NT-proBNP) for MVO has not been previously evaluated., Hypothesis: The purpose of the study was to determine whether NT-proBNP levels measured upon hospital admission of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients receiving primary PCI have predictive value for MVO., Methods: NT-proBNP levels were obtained upon admission to the emergency department, for 41 acute STEMI patients. Cardiac contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) was performed within 4 days after PCI. The optimal cut-off value to predict grade 3 MVO was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine predictors for grade 3 MVO., Results: MVO grade correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; r =-0.383, P = 0.013), peak serum creatine kinase MB iso-enzyme (CK-MB; r = 0.470, P = 0.002), and NT-proBNP levels (r = 0.357, P = 0.022). The optimal cut-off value to predict grade 3 MVO was an NT-proBNP level of ≥80 pg/mL. Multivariate regression analysis, including LVEF, peak CK-MB, and an NT-proBNP ≥80 pg/mL revealed that only an NT-proBNP ≥80 pg/mL was an independent factor related to grade 3 MVO., Conclusion: NT-proBNP levels upon hospital admission have a predictive value for MVOs. Further study is needed to determine if protective treatment strategies are warranted in STEMI patients with high NT-proBNP levels at presentation., (©2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Concerns exist regarding the long-term efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The study aimed to compare the mid- to long-term outcomes of DES vs bare metal stents (BMS) in patients with STEMI in a real-world setting., Methods and Results: Six hundred and eighty four consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention from January 2003 to December 2006 were analyzed; 539 patients (78.8%) with DES and 145 (21.2%) with BMS. Patients were followed for the occurrence of target vessel failure (TVF); a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR). After a follow-up duration of 36 months, the TVF rate was significant lower in the DES group compared with the BMS group (17.8% vs 34.5%, P<0.01), which was mainly driven by a decrease in TVR (9.1% vs 22.8%, P<0.01). Diabetic patients, those with multivessel disease and those treated with smaller or longer stents benefited more from DES implantation. Propensity score matching concordantly indicated a benefit of DES with regard to TVF (13.5% vs 34.2%; P<0.01). The overall incidence of stent thrombosis (ST) in each group was comparable (3.9% vs 4.1%, P=0.47)., Conclusions: Compared to BMS, the mid- to long-term outcome was better in patients receiving DES for acute STEMI. This was driven mainly by a reduction in repeat revascularization.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine which drug-eluting stent (DES) is preferable for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to elucidate the impact of diabetes mellitus on the outcome of each DES., Background: Recent studies have shown the benefit of DES in patients with STEMI. Diabetes mellitus might differentially affect outcomes of each DES., Methods: We analyzed the large-scale, prospective, observational KAMIR (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry) study, which enrolled 4,416 STEMI patients (26% with diabetes) treated with paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) or sirolimus-eluting stent (SES). Primary outcome was major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as a composite of mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR)., Results: In the overall population, the MACE rate at 1 year was significantly higher in the PES than the SES group (11.6% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.014), which was mainly due to increased TLR (3.7% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.001). In the diabetic subgroup, however, the MACE rate was not significantly different between PES and SES (14.5% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.217), in contrast to the nondiabetic subgroup, where PES was inferior to SES as in the overall population. Matching by propensity-score did not significantly alter these results. For TLR, there was interaction between the type of stents and diabetes mellitus (unadjusted: p = 0.052; after propensity-score matching: p = 0.035)., Conclusions: The PES was inferior to the SES in the overall population, with regard to the occurrence of MACE and TLR. However, subgroup analysis for diabetic subjects showed no differences in clinical outcomes between PES and SES. These results suggest that diabetes differentially affects the outcome of first-generation DES., (Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Concerns about safety of drug eluting stents have stirred up controversy on their use in patients with acute STEMI. It is also unknown whether differences in efficacy and safety exist between sirolimus- (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES)., Objective: To investigate the difference in angiographic results and clinical outcome between SES and PES in the treatment of acute STEMI, we analyzed "real world" 6 months angiographic and 1 year clinical outcome of 244 patients, comparing the results between SES and PES., Methods: 244 consecutive acute STEMI patients were analyzed retrospectively (185 patients in SES group (Group S), 59 patients in PES group (Group P). Immediate post PCI and six month angiographic findings were analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography. Clinical events up to 1 year including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization were also analyzed., Results: Baseline clinical and immediate post-procedure angiographic characteristics were similar in the two groups except for mean stent diameter and length which was slightly wider and shorter in group P compared with group S (Mean stent diameterxlength: 3.12+/-0.34x24.4+/-5.1 vs. 3.01+/-0.34x26.6+/-7.2 mm in group P vs. S, p=0.02, p=0.03). At six months, late loss was significantly greater in group P compared with group S (0.35+/-0.62 vs. 0.07+/-0.42, p<0.01), although the difference in binary restenosis was not statistically significant. Diameter stenosis, which was similar immediately after PCI, was significantly greater in group P (22.0+/-17.1 vs. 15.6+/-13.4%, p=0.02). At 1 year, the incidence of stent thrombosis was similar in both groups (5.1% vs. 3.8% for group P vs. C). There were no differences between the two groups up to 1 year with regard to cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and TLR. The free from adverse event rate was not statistically different between the two groups (84.2% vs. 90.2%, p=0.20 for group P vs. C)., Conclusion: In this group of Korean acute STEMI patients, SES stent showed lower late loss compared to PES at 6 months angiographic follow up, but there was no difference in clinical outcome up to 1 year.

We developed an institutional protocol mandating emergency physicians to contact the interventional cardiologist directly in all cases of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and hypothesized that this would reduce door-to-balloon-times (DTBT). From January 2004 to July 2006, 208 patients with STEMI were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 144 patients were treated before implementing the new protocol ("before") and 64 patients were treated after the implementation ("after"). The DTBT was significantly reduced from 148+/-101 min to 108+/-56 min (p<0.05). While only 25% of the "before'' patients received PCI within 90 min after arrival, 50% of the "after'' patients received PCI within 90 min (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between two groups in other outcomes (postprocedural TIMI flow, mortality, subsequent stroke, heart failure, shock, reinfarction, length of stay in intensive care unit, and the total hospital length of stay). In conclusion, mandating emergency physicians to directly notify interventional cardiologists of all STEMI patients reduces DTBT.

Background: The effect of adjunctive heparin for primary angioplasty in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not well established, so the authors investigated the effect of early heparin administration in the emergency room (ER) on initial patency of the infarct-related artery (IRA) and on the clinical outcome in STEMI patients., Methods and Results: One hundred and twenty consecutive patients who presented with STEMI less than 12 h from pain onset and who were eligible for primary percutaneous coronary intervention were allocated to an early heparin group (heparin administered in ER) or a late heparin group (heparin administered after angiography). In the early heparin group, unfractionated heparin (60 U/kg bolus IV, then 14 U . kg(-1) . h(-1) IV infusion) or enoxaparin (1 mg/kg bolus SC) were administered 144+/-95 min before angioplasty. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the early heparin group (n=56) and the late heparin group (n=64). However, initial Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade in the IRA was significantly different between the 2 groups (frequency of TIMI 0/1/2/3; 48/4/7/41% vs 70/8/11/11%, early vs late respectively, p=0.002). TIMI 2 or 3 flow was significantly more frequent in the early heparin group than in the late heparin group (48% vs 22%, p=0.002). However, no significant differences were noted between the 2 groups in terms of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (7% vs 11%, p=0.472) and TIMI major bleeding (2% vs 3%, p=0.639)., Conclusions: In STEMI patients, early heparin therapy administered in the ER improves coronary patency, despite not reaching clinical benefit.

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the extent of and factors related to lumen and vessel area change in coronary arteries after total occlusion (TO) recanalization. Background: TO of a coronary artery promotes negative remodeling in distal reference segments. Recanalization can restore blood flow, potentially leading to positive vascular remodeling. Methods: From March 2005 to June 2008, 58 consecutive patients with de novo TO lesions of at least 1-month duration were enrolled. We performed intravascular ultrasound after successful percutaneous coronary intervention and at the 6-month follow-up, and we quantified changes in the distal reference segments. Results: At the 6-month follow-up, there was a significant increase in the mean lumen diameter (+0.21 mm, p = 0.001), the mean external elastic membrane diameter (+0.13 mm, p = 0.010), the lumen area (+0.87 mm2, p < 0.001), and the external elastic membrane area (+0.85 mm2, p = 0.001) in the distal reference segments and an increase in the left ventricular ejection fraction (+2.77%, p = 0.010). Overall, 40 of 58 patients (69%) showed lumen area increase; these patients had increase in lumen diameter by 0.40 ± 0.34 mm (p < 0.001) and increase in incomplete stent apposition rate (p = 0.006). A TO duration of longer than 3 months (odds ratio [OR]: 14.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28 to 172.8, p = 0.032), a poor collateral flow (OR: 12.0; 95% CI: 1.92 to 74.2, p = 0.008), and statin use (OR: 7.4; 95% CI: 1.03 to 53.6, p = 0.047) were independent predictors of lumen area increase. Conclusions: Recanalization of TO led to lumen area increase in two-thirds of the patients. Independent predictors of lumen area increase were occlusion duration, a poor collateral flow, and statin use. These factors could be used as guides in choosing the optimal stent size during percutaneous coronary intervention to TO lesions and optimal medical therapy during follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The goal of this study was to compare the angiographic outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in a head-to-head manner. Background: EES have been shown to be superior to paclitaxel-eluting stents in inhibiting late loss (LL) and clinical outcome. Whether EES may provide similar angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with SES is undetermined. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial to demonstrate the noninferiority of EES compared with SES in preventing LL at 9 months. A total of 1,443 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized 3:1 to receive EES or SES. Routine follow-up angiography was recommended at 9 months. The primary endpoint was in-segment LL at 9 months, and major secondary endpoints included in-stent LL at 9 months, target lesion failure, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis at 12 months. Data were managed by an independent management center, and clinical events were adjudicated by an independent adjudication committee. Results: Clinical follow-up was available in 1,428 patients and angiographic follow-up in 924 patients (1,215 lesions). The primary endpoint of the study (in-segment LL at 9 months) was 0.11 ± 0.38 mm and 0.06 ± 0.36 mm for EES and SES, respectively (p for noninferiority = 0.0382). The in-stent LL was also noninferior (EES 0.19 ± 0.35 mm; SES 0.15 ± 0.34 mm; p for noninferiority = 0.0121). The incidence of clinical endpoints was not statistically different between the 2 groups, including target lesion failure (3.75% vs. 3.05%; p = 0.53) and stent thrombosis (0.37% vs. 0.83%; p = 0.38). Conclusions: EES were noninferior to SES in inhibition of LL after stenting, which was corroborated by similar rates of clinical outcomes. (Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in Reducing Late Loss After Stenting [EXCELLENT]; NCT00698607) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Recent studies have suggested that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease renders outcomes comparable to those from coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). It is necessary to stratify individual patient risk and select the optimal revascularization strategy. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with unprotected LMCA disease who had undergone PCI with drug-eluting stents or CABG. We identified 462 patients who were treated from January 2003 to December 2006 for unprotected LMCA or LMCA-equivalent disease: 257 had undergone CABG and 205 had undergone PCI with drug-eluting stents. Analyses using propensity scores were performed to minimize the selection bias in the present observational study. After a median follow-up of 33.5 months, no significant difference was found between the CABG and PCI groups in the risk of death (12.1% vs 14.1%, respectively; p = 0.428) or the risk of a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident (17.5% vs 20.0%, respectively; p = 0.434). The rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was significantly lower in the CABG group than in the PCI group (21.8% vs 35.1%, respectively; p = 0.001); the difference was mainly driven by a decrease in the rate of repeat revascularizations (5.1% vs 22.4%; p <0.001). The analyses after propensity score adjustment and matching corroborated the crude group results. In conclusion, PCI with drug-eluting stents showed a safety profile comparable to that of CABG in patients with unprotected LMCA disease. However, the risk of repeat revascularization was significantly greater in the PCI group. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: The drug-eluting stent (DES) has been proven its efficacy in randomized trials. But the difference of efficacy between sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in unselected patients is in controversy. Therefore, we investigated the clinical and angiographic outcomes of these two types of the DES. Methods: All consecutive patients treated with DES from March 2003 to March 2004 at two centers were analyzed. Results: We analyzed 440 patients with 519 lesions who were treated with the two types of DES (SES 353 lesions/296 patients, PES 166 lesions/144 patients). PES group had more acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. Angiographically, the number of stents per lesion, maximal deployment pressure, stent diameter and the percent residual stenosis after procedure were different between the two groups. Angiographic follow-up was available in 103 patients (71.5%) in the PES group and 208 patients (70.3%) in the SES group. PES showed the higher binary restenosis rate (PES 17.9%, SES 4.5%, p <0.0001) and the larger late loss (PES 0.60×0.83 mm vs. SES 0.16×0.40 mm, p <0.001) than SES. PES was the predictor of binary restenosis at six months (OR 4.67, CI 2.20–9.91). At one year follow-up, PES also had more cardiac events (composites of death of all cause, MI, and target lesion revascularization) than SES (PES 13.9% vs. SES 6.1%, p <0.001). PES was a significant predictor of cardiac events at one year (OR 2.47, CI 1.23–4.95). Conclusion: SES showed better clinical and angiographic outcomes compared to PES in a daily routine practice of coronary intervention in Koreans. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: For evaluation of post-operative stent associated cardiac events after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation we analyzed data of 138 patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery after DES implantation and compared the data with those of 101 patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery after bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. Three patients (2.2%) in DES group developed post-operative cardiac events and none in BMS group (p =0.2). One patient died due to suspected stent thrombosis and the other two had myocardial infarction due to angiographically proven stent thrombosis. The time interval between stent implantation and surgery in those with cardiac events was 6, 264, and 367 days, respectively. Our data shows that peri-operative stent-related thrombotic complications can occur long after DES implantation and careful peri-operative monitoring for cardiac events is needed in patients receiving non-cardiac surgery after DES implantation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]