Search

Objective This study aimed to determine the healthcare experiences, quality of life, and psychosocial needs of patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) early after diagnosis; comparing their experiences to patients with advanced cancer of a known primary (non-CUP control patients) and published general population reference data where available. Methods This study was a cross-sectional, multi-site study comparing CUP patients (n = 139) compared to non-CUP controls (n = 45). Demographic, clinical information and patient-reported outcome questionnaire data were collected at baseline. Results Differences in healthcare experienced were found between CUP and non-CUP controls with CUP patients reporting higher scores for unmet medical communication/information needs compared with non-CUP control patients (p = 0.013) as well as greater uncertainty in illness (p = 0.042). Whilst no differences were found between CUP and non-CUP controls on the EORTC and PROMIS measures, of those that ‘received written information about your cancer…’ and asked ‘…how useful was it?’ fewer CUP patients reported finding the information useful 40% vs 61%, and more were likely to not have received written information at all 59% vs 32%; (p = 0.002). Additionally, of those that found information about their cancer online, fewer patients with CUP reported finding it useful 32% vs 48% control patients (p = 0.005). Conclusions CUP patients have unmet medical communication/information needs and greater uncertainty in illness but do not differ in health-related quality of life domains compared to patients with advanced cancer of a known primary.

Patients diagnosed with Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) experience high levels of psychological distress and report poor understanding of their cancer. We aimed to investigate: (1) if CUP patients with poorer understanding of their cancer diagnosis and testing experience more symptoms of psychological distress than those with better understanding; (2) if the relationship between patients' understanding of their cancer and psychological distress is mediated by illness uncertainty; and (3) explore whether patients' degree of understanding of their cancer can be predicted by clinical and socio-demographic factors.209 CUP patients completed a questionnaire measuring anxiety, depression, illness uncertainty, fatigue, pain, sleep and understanding of their cancer. Using an apriori theoretical framework, we employed structural equation modelling to investigate predictors of patient's understanding of their cancer and psychological distress and the relationships between understanding, illness uncertainty and distress.The structural equation model displayed good fit indices and supported the hypothesised relationship of patient's understanding of their cancer and the extent of psychological distress, which was mediated via illness uncertainty. Physical symptoms were positively associated with psychological distress and illness uncertainty. Younger age was predictive of lower patient's understanding of their cancer and higher levels of psychological distress.Patients with CUP, particularly those who are younger and experiencing more physical symptoms, report higher levels of psychological distress and may require additional mental health support. Our findings highlight a need to improve CUP patient's understanding about their illness, which could help reduce their illness uncertainty and alleviate psychological distress.

PURPOSE Tubo-ovarian cancer (TOC) is a sentinel cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PVs). Identification of a PV in the first member of a family at increased genetic risk (the proband) provides opportunities for cancer prevention in other at-risk family members. Although Australian testing rates are now high, PVs in patients with TOC whose diagnosis predated revised testing guidelines might have been missed. We assessed the feasibility of detecting PVs in this population to enable genetic risk reduction in relatives. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this pilot study, deceased probands were ascertained from research cohort studies, identification by a relative, and gynecologic oncology clinics. DNA was extracted from archival tissue or stored blood for panel sequencing of 10 risk-associated genes. Testing of deceased probands ascertained through clinic records was performed with a consent waiver. RESULTS We identified 85 PVs in 84 of 787 (11%) probands. Familial contacts of 39 of 60 (65%) deceased probands with an identified recipient (60 of 84; 71%) have received a written notification of results, with follow-up verbal contact made in 85% (33 of 39). A minority of families (n = 4) were already aware of the PV. For many (29 of 33; 88%), the genetic result provided new information and referral to a genetic service was accepted in most cases (66%; 19 of 29). Those who declined referral (4 of 29) were all male next of kin whose family member had died more than 10 years before. CONCLUSION We overcame ethical and logistic challenges to demonstrate that retrospective genetic testing to identify PVs in previously untested deceased probands with TOC is feasible. Understanding reasons for a family member's decision to accept or decline a referral will be important for guiding future TRACEBACK projects.

Background Diagnosis and management of cancers of unknown primary (CUP) remain challenging. This study examines the referral patterns, management and outcomes of patients referred to Australia’s first dedicated CUP clinic. Methods Retrospective medical record review was conducted for patients seen at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre CUP clinic between July 2014 and August 2020. Overall survival (OS) was analysed for patients with a CUP diagnosis where treatment information was available. Results Of 361 patients referred, fewer than half had completed diagnostic work-up at the time of referral. A diagnosis of CUP was established in 137 (38%), malignancy other than CUP in 177 (49%) and benign pathology in 36 (10%) patients. Genomic testing was successfully completed in 62% of patients with initial provisional CUP and impacted management in 32% by identifying a tissue of origin or actionable genomic alteration. The use of site-specific, targeted therapy or immunotherapy was independently associated with longer OS compared to empirical chemotherapy. Conclusion Our specialised CUP clinic facilitated diagnostic work-up among patients with suspected malignancy and provided access to genomic testing and clinical trials for patients with a CUP diagnosis, all of which are important to improve outcomes in this patient population.

BackgroundCancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers where a primary tissue of origin (TOO) is uncertain. Most patients with CUP have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be efficacious in some patients with CUP, but the optimal predictive biomarkers are unknown. We therefore assessed immune and genomic biomarkers as well as predicted TOO in patients with CUP, including a subset treated with ICIs.MethodsPatients with CUP were subject to gene-expression profiling (GEP) and DNA panel sequencing. Immune and stromal-related gene expression was explored by NanoString, including genes associated with immunotherapy response (IR) in other solid malignancies. ICI responsive cancer types were assigned based on Food and Drug Administration-approved indications, and either detection of a latent primary tumor or the TOO was suspected based on genomics informed pathology review. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and gene mutations were also assessed.ResultsA total of 219 patients with CUP were included, 215 assessed for TOO in a previous study, with the majority (163) receiving both RNA and DNA tests. Of GEP profiled cases, 33% (59/175) had a high IR gene-expression score. Of the DNA sequenced cases, 16% (32/203) had high TMB (>10 mutations/Mb), including two with mismatch repair deficiency. Low correlation was observed between TMB and an IR score (R=0.26, pConclusionsA significant fraction of CUP tumors had genomic features previously associated with ICI response. High IR score was the most sensitive predictive feature of ICI response, warranting evaluation in a larger patient series.

5515 Background: Cyclin E1 gene amplification and protein over-expression is a marker of platinum resistance in high grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer (HGSC), and may predict response to WEE1 inhibition. Adavosertib, a WEE1 inhibitor, has demonstrated activity in unselected women with recurrent ovarian and serous endometrial cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adavosertib in women with recurrent platinum resistant HGSC with cyclin E1 over-expression, with and without gene amplification. Methods: IGNITE is a multicentre, phase 2 trial with 2 cohorts of women with recurrent platinum resistant HGSC. Tumors were assessed for cyclin E1 protein expression by IHC and CCNE1 copy number by FISH. Patients were assigned to Cohort 1 if tumors were cyclin E1 over-expressed (H-score>50) and amplified (≥8 copies), and Cohort 2 if tumors were overexpressed and nonamplified. Patients with evaluable disease by RECIST v1.1 or GCIG CA-125 criteria were included. Adavosertib 300mg PO was given daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was investigator assessed clinical benefit (CB) defined as absence of progression for ≥ 18 weeks. Here we present the 18-week response data for the first 32 patients treated from Cohort 2, with a data cut-off of August 2021. Results: Between Jan-2020 and May-2021, 32 patients were accrued to Cohort 2. Median age was 62 years (range 42-77) and 84% had received ≥2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Median cyclin E1 IHC H-score was 120 and 28 patients (88%) had measurable disease by RECIST. Median number of cycles commenced was 8 (range 1-19). Overall response rate (ORR) was 53% and CB rate was 61% for all evaluable patients. Seventeen patients (53%) required a dose reduction, most commonly for neutropenia or fatigue. Seventeen patients experienced ≥Grade 3 treatment related adverse event, and 4 patients (15%) discontinued due to toxicity. Conclusions: The efficacy results in a biomarker-selected cohort of patients are promising with a higher response rate than reported in previous studies of adavosertib in unselected women with recurrent HGSC. Duration of response and progression free survival data will be presented as data matures. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12619001185156P. [Table: see text]

SummaryUnderstanding the mechanism underlying the regulation of the androgen receptor (AR), a central player in the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), holds promise for overcoming the challenge of treating CRPC. We demonstrate that the ubiquitin ligase Siah2 targets a select pool of NCOR1-bound, transcriptionally-inactive AR for ubiquitin-dependent degradation, thereby promoting expression of select AR target genes implicated in lipid metabolism, cell motility, and proliferation. Siah2 is required for prostate cancer cell growth under androgen-deprivation conditions in vitro and in vivo, and Siah2 inhibition promotes prostate cancer regression upon castration. Notably, Siah2 expression is markedly increased in human CRPCs. Collectively, we find that selective regulation of AR transcriptional activity by the ubiquitin ligase Siah2 is important for CRPC development.

The relationship between habitual consumption of foods with a high glycemic index (GI) and/or a diet with a high glycemic load (GL) and risk of endometrial cancer is uncertain, and relatively few studies have investigated these associations. The objectives of this study were to examine the association between GI/GL and risk of endometrial cancer using data from an Australian population-based case-control study and systematically review all the available evidence to quantify the magnitude of the association using meta-analysis.The case-control study included 1,290 women aged 18-79 years with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed endometrial cancer and 1,436 population controls. Controls were selected to match the expected Australian state of residence and age distribution (in 5-year bands) of cases. For the systematic review, relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed and Embase databases through to July 2011. Random-effects models were used to calculate the summary risk estimates, overall and dose-response.In our case-control study, we observed a modest positive association between high dietary GI (OR 1.43, 95 % CI 1.11-1.83) and risk of endometrial cancer, but no association with high dietary GL (OR 1.15, 95 % CI 0.90-1.48). For the meta-analysis, we collated information from six cohort and two case-control studies, involving a total of 5,569 cases. The pooled OR for the highest versus the lowest intake category of GI was 1.15 (0.95-1.40); however, there was significant heterogeneity (p 0.004) by study design (RR 1.00 [95 % CI 0.87-1.14] for cohort studies and 1.56 [95 % CI 1.21-2.02] for case-control studies). There was no association in the dose-response meta-analysis of GI (RR per 5 unit/day increment of GI 1.00, 95 % CI 0.97-1.03). GL was positively associated with endometrial cancer. The pooled RR for the highest versus the lowest GL intake was 1.21 (95 % CI 1.09-1.33) and 1.06 (95 % CI 1.01-1.11) per 50 unit/day increment of GL in the dose-response meta-analysis.The pooled results from observational studies, including our case-control results, provide evidence of a modest positive association between high GL, but not GI, and endometrial cancer risk.

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC) responds poorly to platinum based chemotherapy and is characterized by activating RAS-MAPK pathway mutations, including oncogenic BRAF. Drugs that target this pathway are effective in BRAF-mutant melanoma but other cancer types, such as colorectal cancers, are less sensitive. Early phase trials report a 15% response rate to MEK inhibitors in LGSC patients, however it is not known which features may predict response. We aimed to determine clinical characteristics and treatment response in women with LGSC and to determine whether response to targeted pathway inhibition is associated with specific mutation profiles in LGSC cell lines. Tumor samples from a cohort of grade 1 and 2 serous ovarian cancer patients were analyzed using targeted, exome or whole genome sequencing. Patient characteristics, treatment and clinical outcome were assessed. Cell lines derived from patients with LGSC with known mutation profiles, AOCS2 (KRAS/BRAF/NRAS wild-type), MPSC1 (BRAFV600L, NRASQ16R), VOA1056 (NRASQ16R) and HCC5075 (KRASG12V), were treated with BRAF (dabrafenib) or MEK inhibitors (trametinib, pimasertib and binimetinib) and response was compared to cell lines derived from high-grade serous cancer (HGSC) and BRAF-mutant melanoma. Women diagnosed with grade 1 or 2 serous carcinoma between 1994-2015 were identified from 1654 invasive ovarian serous cancer cases in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study and the GynBiobank. HGSC cases were excluded following histopathology review and TP53 mutation screening. Amongst 65 confirmed LGSC patients, 18 (27.7%) had a KRAS mutation, 9 (13.8%) had a BRAF mutation and 7 (10.8%) had a NRAS mutation. Women with advanced stage LGSC and residual disease following debulking surgery had a similarly poor progression-free and overall-survival compared with HGSC patients. We saw a dramatic response to BRAF inhibition in a patient with BRAFV600E-positive LGSC, however, the LGSC cell lines did not respond to dabrafenib. This is not surprising as the cell lines did not harbour the hot-spot BRAFV600E mutation. MPSC1 has a BRAFV600L and a NRASQ16R mutation, but dabrafenib did not inhibit growth. HCC5075 (KRASG12V) was sensitive to all three MEK inhibitors, but response to MEK inhibition in the other LGSC cell lines was modest. In conclusion, LGSC are generally chemotherapy resistant and molecular analyses can identify targetable mutations. However, LGSC are heterogenous with respect to underlying mutations and response to pathway inhibitors is likely to depend on which mutations and pathways are activated. BRAF mutations are not uncommon in patients with LGSC and should be routinely tested as BRAF inhibitors can be an effective treatment for these patients. MEK inhibitors may also be effective in a subset of cases. The results highlight the need for novel clinical trial design, as traditional clinical trials are unlikely to be effective in rare ovarian cancer sub-types. Citation Format: Tania Moujaber, Dariush Etemadmoghadam, Cristina Mapagu, Catherine Kennedy, Yoke-Eng Chiew, Casina Kan, Nikilyn Nevins, Sivatharsny Srirangan, Sian Fereday, Nadia Traficante, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study group, David Bowtell, Rosemary Balleine, Paul Harnett, Anna deFazio. Mutations in low-grade serous ovarian cancer and response to BRAF and MEK inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2584.

Purpose: A significant number of women with serous ovarian cancer are intrinsically refractory to platinum-based treatment. We analyzed somatic DNA copy number variation and gene expression data to identify key mechanisms associated with primary resistance in advanced-stage serous cancers. Experimental Design: Genome-wide copy number variation was measured in 118 ovarian tumors using high-resolution oligonucleotide microarrays. A well-defined subset of 85 advanced-stage serous tumors was then used to relate copy number variation to primary resistance to treatment. The discovery-based approach was complemented by quantitative-PCR copy number analysis of 12 candidate genes as independent validation of previously reported associations with clinical outcome. Likely copy number variation targets and tumor molecular subtypes were further characterized by gene expression profiling. Results: Amplification of 19q12, containing cyclin E (CCNE1), and 20q11.22-q13.12, mapping immediately adjacent to the steroid receptor coactivator NCOA3, was significantly associated with poor response to primary treatment. Other genes previously associated with copy number variation and clinical outcome in ovarian cancer were not associated with primary treatment resistance. Chemoresistant tumors with high CCNE1 copy number and protein expression were associated with increased cellular proliferation but so too was a subset of treatment-responsive patients, suggesting a cell-cycle independent role for CCNE1 in modulating chemoresponse. Patients with a poor clinical outcome without CCNE1 amplification overexpressed genes involved in extracellular matrix deposition. Conclusions: We have identified two distinct mechanisms of primary treatment failure in serous ovarian cancer, involving CCNE1 amplification and enhanced extracellular matrix deposition. CCNE1 copy number is validated as a dominant marker of patient outcome in ovarian cancer.

Background: X chromosome inactivation, which silences gene expression from one of the two X chromosomes in females, is usually random. Skewed X inactivation has been implicated in both the expression and the suppression of X-linked disease phenotypes and has been reported to occur more frequently in breast and ovarian cancer patients, including BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, than in control subjects. Methods: We assessed the pattern of X chromosome inactivation using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction amplification of the exon 1 microsatellite region of the X-linked androgen receptor (AR) gene in DNA from blood samples obtained from control subjects without a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer (n = 735), ovarian cancer patients (n = 313), familial breast cancer patients who did not carry mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (n = 235), and affected and unaffected carriers of mutations in BRCA1 (n = 260) or BRCA2 (n = 63). We defined the pattern of X chromosome inactivation as skewed when the same X chromosome was active in at least 90% of cells. The association between skewed X inactivation and disease and/or BRCA mutation status was assessed by logistic regression analysis. The association between skewed X inactivation and age at cancer diagnosis was assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The age-adjusted frequency of skewed X inactivation was not statistically significantly higher in ovarian cancer or familial breast cancer case subjects compared with control subjects. Skewed X inactivation was higher in BRCA1 mutation carriers than in control subjects (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 6.2; P = .02), particularly among unaffected women (OR = 6.1, 95% CI = 1.5 to 31.8; P = .005). Among BRCA1 mutation carriers, those with skewed X inactivation were older at diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer than those without skewed X inactivation (hazard ratio [HR] of breast or ovarian cancer = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.95; P = .04). Among BRCA2 mutation carriers, skewed X inactivation also occurred more frequently in unaffected carriers than in those diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer (OR = 5.2, 95% CI = 0.5 to 28.9; P = .08) and was associated with delayed age at onset (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.94; P = .03). Conclusions: Skewed X inactivation occurs at an increased frequency in BRCA1 (and possibly BRCA2) mutation carriers compared with control subjects and is associated with a statistically significant increase in age at diagnosis of breast and ovarian cancer. © The Author 2008

Background: The five year survival rate for women with ovarian cancer (OC) is less than 40%. Crucial to improving the outcomes for ovarian cancer patients is the development of accurate pre-clinical models of human epithelial OC, which can be used to unravel the mechanisms underlying its evolution and behaviour. Methods: We have generated a novel xenograft model of human high-grade serous OC (HG-SOC) in order to enable preclinical molecular and drug response assessment of individual HG-SOC: this includes a comparison of standard OC xeno-transplantion approaches (intra-peritoneal, subcutaneous and sub renal capsular), with the novel use of the rodent ovarian bursa, the orthotopic site. Utilising the rodent bursa may better replicate the relevant microenvironment and increase the success of EOC xeno-transplantion. Other aspects designed to optimize the model include the use of NOD-SCID-IL-2rg recipient mice, systemic estrogen supplementation and transplantation of fresh human HG-SOC fragments which have had no prior in vitro culture. Histological, functional and molecular analysis of the novel xenograft cohort (at baseline and following xenotransplantation) includes histological review; documentation of in vitro Homologous Recombination (HR) DNA repair and drug response capabilities (using novel α-irradiation and explant drug assays); classification according to molecular subtype (Tothill classfier); documentation of NHEJ pathway status, BRCA1/2 status and other DNA repair gene status. In vivo drug treatment studies are being performed, with the choice of treatment targeted to the specific molecular characteristics of the HG-SOC in question. Results: Fourteen consecutive chemotherapy naive potentially HG-SOC samples have been collected. Corresponding clinical data has been collected. Data concerning DNA repair capability and response to DNA damaging agents will be presented, including IHC for markers of DNA damage (γH2AX), DNA repair (RAD51) and apoptosis (capsase 3 cleavage). HG-SOC in this cohort have been classified according to Tothilll (Tothill et al 2008). Eight appropriate HG-SOC have been transplanted and 5 of the first 6 have successfully xenografted, with phenotyping of xenografts underway. In vivo analysis of response to cisplatin treatment and other relevant therapeutics will be presented. Conclusions: A novel xenograft model has been developed of human HG-SOC, which includes comparative characterization of important prognostic features both in the baseline panel of fresh human HG-SOC and in subsequent xenografts. This clinically, functionally and molecularly annotated consecutive xenograft cohort of HG-SOC will provide outstanding utility for the development of improved therapeutic approaches. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3276. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3276