1. Real-life benchmarking bladder cancer care: A population-based study.
- Author
-
Moreno, Nicolas Vanin, Whitehead, Marlo, and Siemens, D. Robert
- Subjects
- *
MEDICAL quality control , *CYSTECTOMY , *KEY performance indicators (Management) , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *TRANSURETHRAL resection of bladder , *BENCHMARKING (Management) , *CLINICAL medicine , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *ONCOLOGIC surgery , *RADIOTHERAPY , *CANCER patient medical care , *LONGITUDINAL method , *ONCOLOGY ,BLADDER tumors - Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a complex oncological surgical procedure and population studies of routine surgical care have suggested suboptimal results compared to high-volume centers of excellence. A previous Canadian bladder cancer quality-of-care consensus led to adoption of multiple key quality-of-care indicators, with associated benchmarks created using available evidence and expert opinion to inform and measure future performance. Herein, we report real-life benchmark performance for the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) relative to expert opinion guidance. METHODS: This is a population-based, retrospective, cohort study that used the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR) to identify all incident patients who underwent RC from 2009-2013. Electronic records of treatment from 1573 patients were linked to OCR; pathology records were obtained for all cases and reviewed by a team of trained data abstractors. The primary objective was to describe benchmarks for identified indicators, first as median values obtained across hospitals or providers, as well as a "pared-mean" approach to identify a benchmark population of "top performance," as defined as the best outcome accomplished for at least 10% of the population. RESULTS: Overall, performance in Ontario across all indicators fell short of expert opiniondetermined benchmarks. Annual surgical volume by each surgeon performing a RC (benchmark >6, percent of institutions meeting benchmark=20%), percent of patients with MIBC referred preoperatively to medical oncology (MO; benchmark>90%, percent of institutions meeting benchmark=2%) and radiation oncology (RO; benchmark>50%, percent of institutions meeting benchmark=0%), time to cystectomy within six weeks of transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) in patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (benchmark <6 weeks, percent of institutions meeting benchmark=0%), percent of patients with adequate lymph node dissection (defined as >14 nodes, benchmark>85%, percent of institutions meeting benchmark=0%), percent of patients with positive margins post-RC (benchmark <10%, percent of institutions meeting benchmark=46%), and 90-day mortality (benchmark<5%, percent of institutions meeting benchmark=37%) fell considerably short. Simply evaluating benchmarks across the province as median performance significantly underestimated benchmarks that were possible by top-performing hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Performance through most bladder cancer quality-of-care indicators fall short of benchmarks proposed by expert opinion. Different methodologies, such as a paredmean approach of top performers, may provide more realistic benchmarking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF