Search

Objective: This study aimed to assess if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold and PSA bounce are associated with oncological control after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) alone or with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), considering serum testosterone levels., Methods: This study enrolled 944 prostate cancer patients treated at a single institution with LDR-BT alone or LDR-BT combined with EBRT, with or without ADT. The Fine-Gray hazard model was used to evaluate factors related to clinical failure, including experience of PSA bounce between baseline and 2, 4, or 7 years after LDR-BT and PSA value (0.1, 0.2, or 0.5 ng/mL) with normal testosterone levels at 2, 4, and 7 years after LDR-BT, respectively., Results: Patients with normal testosterone levels and a PSA of 0.2 or 0.5 ng/mL at 2, 4, and 7 years after LDR-BT had a significantly better clinical failure free rate (CFFR) than those with PSA levels >0.2 or >0.5 ng/mL or low testosterone levels. Multivariate analysis revealed that PSA <0.1, 0.2, or 0.5 ng/mL with normal testosterone levels at 2, 4, and 7 years and experience of PSA bounce between baseline and 2 or 4 years after LDR-BT were significantly related to better CFFR., Conclusions: Patients with normal serum testosterone levels who reached PSA of <0.1, 0.2, or 0.5 ng/mL after LDR-BT, or those who experienced PSA bounce, showed better oncological control., (Copyright © 2024 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Because patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce do not experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) until PSA bounce occurs, the period until PSA bounce ends can be considered the so-called lead-time bias. Therefore, we evaluated differences in BCR-free rate in prostate cancer patients who were BCR-free 4 years after 125I-brachytherapy alone. Furthermore, we evaluated predictors for PSA bounce and the correlation between testosterone and PSA bounce., Methods: From 2004 to 2012, 256 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma underwent 125I-brachytherapy alone. PSA and testosterone levels were monitored prior to 125I-brachytherapy, at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60 months after 125I-brachytherapy and yearly after 5-year follow-up. PSA bounce was defined as ≥0.2 ng/ml increase above the interval PSA nadir, followed by a decrease to nadir or below., Results: BCR-free rate in patients with PSA bounce (100% 7-year BCR-free rate) was significantly better (P < 0.044) than that in patients without PSA bounce (95.7% 7-year BCR-free rate) in patients who were BCR-free 4 years after 125I-brachytherapy alone (n = 223). Age was the only predictor (odds ratio: 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.88-0.98, P = 0.004) for PSA bounce (n = 177). The testosterone level at PSA bounce was significantly higher (P = 0.036) than that at nadir before PSA bounce (87 cases)., Conclusions: Patients with PSA bounce had good BCR-free rate even in patients who were BCR-free 4 years after 125I-brachytherapy alone. Testosterone levels were higher at PSA bounce; increased testosterone levels may be a cause of PSA bounce., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: To compare the PSA value at the last follow-up of patients who underwent prostate low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) with that of patients who underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)., Methods: A total of 610 prostate cancer patients (cT1c-3bN0M0) were enrolled, and 445 of them underwent LDR-BT, while 165 received IMRT (74-76 Gy). The median follow-up period of these two groups was 75 months (LDR-BT) and 78 months (IMRT), respectively. We also evaluated the biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free rate using two definitions (Phoenix definition and PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL)., Results: The percentage of patients who achieved PSA < 0.2 ng/mL at the last follow-up was 77.5% in the LDR-BT group and 49.7% in the IMRT group (p < 0.001). Among patients with a normal testosterone level at the last follow-up, the percentage of those who achieved PSA < 0.2 ng/mL at the last follow-up was 79.2% in the LDR-BT group and 32.1% in the IMRT group (p < 0.001). The 5-year BCR-free rate by the Phoenix definition in the IMRT and LDR-BT groups was 89.5 and 95.0% (p < 0.001), respectively. On the other hand, the 5-year BCR-free rate using the definition of PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL was 59.1 and 80.1% in the IMRT and LDR-BT groups, respectively (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The PSA value at the last follow-up of LDR-BT was significantly lower than that of IMRT, and this result was particularly marked in patients with a normal testosterone level at the last follow-up.

Objectives: Previously, one randomized control trial (TAX327) revealed the efficacy of docetaxel-based chemotherapy combined with prednisone. On the other hand, several studies showed a high prostate specific antigen (PSA) response with low-dose dexamethasone in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel-based chemotherapy combined with dexamethasone in CRPC patients., Materials and Methods: This study was a single-arm multi-institutional phase II trial. Patients received 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel, and 0.5 mg of dexamethasone orally twice a day continuing throughout the treatment period. Treatment was planned for 10 cycles, and continued for at least four cycles depending on the observation of PSA flare. The primary endpoint was PSA response defined as a reduction from baseline of at least 50% that continued for at least 3 weeks. Secondary endpoints were safety, PSA flare, time to PSA failure and adherence rate to protocol treatment (10 cycles)., Results: Between January 2011 and February 2014, a total of 76 chemotherapy-naïve CRPC patients were enrolled. Seventy-five patients received docetaxel-based chemotherapy combined with dexamethasone. The median age and PSA level at enrollment were 71 years (53-85) and 23.2 ng/mL (2.9-852), respectively. PSA response rate was 76.8% (90% confidence interval (CI): 66.9-84.9). Of all patients, 30 patients completed 10 cycles of chemotherapy (40%). The incidence rate of PSA flare was 10.7% (eight patients). The median time to PSA failure was 369 days (95% CI: 245-369). The most frequently observed adverse event was hematotoxicity (neutropenia of G2 or greater: 100%)., Conclusions: The present study showed a significantly high PSA response compared with previous reports. Most patients tolerated the protocol treatment well, whereas hematotoxicity was often observed., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) has played an important role in the treatment of prostate cancer. We sought to identify factors of PSA progression in our series of patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer treated with PADT., Methods: Six-hundred forty-nine patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer who received PADT from 1998 to 2005 by Nara Uro-Oncology Research Group were enrolled. Age, T classification, stage, PSA level at diagnosis, Gleason score, laterality of cancer detected by biopsy and seminal vesicle involvement (SVI) were adopted as parameters of PSA progression. Cox's proportional hazards model was used to determine the predictive factors for PSA progression., Results: The median follow-up period and the median PSA level at diagnosis were 49 months and 15 ng/mL. The 5-year disease specific survival rate, overall survival rate and PSA progression-free survival (PFS) rate were 97.9 %, 91.9 % and 71.2 %, respectively. The univariate analysis showed that the PSA level at diagnosis, Gleason score, laterality of cancer detected by biopsy and SVI were independent predictive parameters of PSA-PFS. However, by multivariate analysis, only laterality of cancer detected by biopsy (unilateral vs. bilateral) was an independent predictive parameter of PSA-PFS (p = 0.034). The patients were classified into new risk groups base on three factors: PSA level at diagnosis, Gleason score, and laterality of cancer detected by biopsy. The PSA-PFS rates at 5-years in the low- (none or one factor), intermediate- (two factors) and high-risk (three factors) groups were 78.2 %, 62.5 % and 46.9 % (p < 0.001), respectively., Conclusion: In localized or locally advanced prostate cancer patients who received PADT, laterality of cancer detected by biopsy was a significant predictor associated with a longer PSA-PFS. Our new risk grouping indicates the usefulness of PSA-PFS.

Background: To assess the biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free rate in patients who underwent prostate low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-brachytherapy), using two different definitions (Phoenix definition and PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL)., Methods: Two hundreds and three patients who were clinically diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-2cN0M0) and underwent LDR-brachytherapy between July 2004 and September 2008 were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 72 months. We evaluated the BCR-free rate using the Phoenix definition and the PSA cut-off value of 0.2 ng/mL, as in the definition for radical prostatectomy. To evaluate an independent variable that can predict BCR, Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis was carried out., Results: The BCR-free rate in patients using the Phoenix definition was acceptable (5-year: 92.8%). The 5- year BCR-free rate using the strict definition (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL) was 74.1%. Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis showed that a higher biological effective dose (BED) of ≥180 Gy2 was the only independent variable that could predict BCR (HR: 0.570, 95% C.I.: 0.327-0.994, p = 0.048). Patients with a higher BED (≥180 Gy2) had a significantly higher BCR-free rate than those with a lower BED (<180 Gy2) (5-year BCR-free rate: 80.5% vs. 67.4%)., Conclusions: A higher BED ≥180 Gy2 promises a favorable BCR-free rate, even if the strict definition is adopted.

Background: Primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) is the most effective systemic therapy for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Nevertheless, once PSA progression develops, the prognosis is serious and mortal. We sought to identify factors that predicted the prognosis in a series of patients with metastatic prostate cancer., Methods: Two-hundred eighty-six metastatic prostate cancer patients who received PADT from 1998 to 2005 in Nara Uro-Oncology Research Group were enrolled. The log-rank test and Cox's proportional hazards model were used to determine the predictive factors for prognosis; rate of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and overall survival., Results: The median age, follow-up period and PSA level at diagnosis were 73 years, 47 months and 174 ng/mL, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate was 63.0%. The multivariable analysis showed that Gleason score (Hazard ratio [HR]:1.362; 95% confidence interval [C.I.], 1.023-1.813), nadir PSA (HR:6.332; 95% C.I., 4.006-9.861) and time from PADT to nadir (HR:4.408; 95% C.I., 3.099-6.271) were independent prognostic factors of the incidence of CRPC. The independent parameters in the multivariate analysis that predicted overall survival were nadir PSA (HR:5.221; 95% C.I., 2.757-9.889) and time from PADT to nadir (HR:4.008; 95% C.I., 2.137-7.517)., Conclusions: Nadir PSA and time from PADT to nadir were factors that affect both CRPC and overall survival in a cohort of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Lower nadir PSA level and longer time from PADT to nadir were good for survival and progression.

Background: To clarify the significant clinicopathological and postdosimetric parameters to predict PSA bounce in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-brachytherapy) for prostate cancer., Methods: We studied 200 consecutive patients who received LDR-brachytherapy between July 2004 and November 2008. Of them, 137 patients did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. One hundred and forty-two patients were treated with LDR-brachytherapy alone, and 58 were treated with LDR-brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiation therapy. The cut-off value of PSA bounce was 0.1 ng/mL. The incidence, time, height, and duration of PSA bounce were investigated. Clinicopathological and postdosimetric parameters were evaluated to elucidate independent factors to predict PSA bounce in hormone-naïve patients who underwent LDR-brachytherapy alone., Results: Fifty patients (25%) showed PSA bounce and 10 patients (5%) showed PSA failure. The median time, height, and duration of PSA bounce were 17 months, 0.29 ng/mL, and 7.0 months, respectively. In 103 hormone-naïve patients treated with LDR-brachytherapy alone, and univariate Cox proportional regression hazard model indicated that age and minimal percentage of the dose received by 30% and 90% of the urethra were independent predictors of PSA bounce. With a multivariate Cox proportional regression hazard model, minimal percentage of the dose received by 90% of the urethra was the most significant parameter of PSA bounce., Conclusions: Minimal percentage of the dose received by 90% of the urethra was the most significant predictor of PSA bounce in hormone-naïve patients treated with LDR-brachytherapy alone.

In this report, we describe a case of phyllodes tumor of the prostate with a high value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). A 47-year-old man with symptoms of hematospermia presented with a steadily elevated serum PSA value of 60.76 ng/mL (normal range, < 4 ng/mL). A needle biopsy revealed atypical stromal cells without any evidence of malignancy. After radical prostatectomy, the tumor measured 2.9 cm in diameter and consisted of a single nodule composed of irregular, elongated epithelial ducts and atypical stromal cells with enlarged, occasionally multinucleated, pleomorphic, or hyperchromatic nuclei. Immunohistochemistry showed that the atypical stromal cells were positive for vimentin, androgen receptor, estrogen receptor, progesterone, and 5α-reductase, but negative for MIB-1, PSA, SMA, p53, desmin, CD34, c-kit, CD10, S-100, and EGFR. Excess PSA might be secreted by hyperplastic luminal cells driven by 5α-reductase-positive stromal and epithelial cells. Array-comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) for genomic alterations revealed a gain of 11p13, which includes the WT1 gene, and a loss of 1p36.23 and 12p12.1. After surgery, the serum PSA value rapidly decreased to within the normal range; no recurrence or distant metastasis was noted after 2 years of follow up., (© 2012 The Authors. Pathology International © 2012 Japanese Society of Pathology and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncological outcomes in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy in various risk groups., Methods: The subjects were 468 patients with clinically localized or locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate (T1-3N0M0) who underwent retropubic radical prostatectomy with/without neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy at Nara Medical University and its affiliated hospitals between January 1997 and December 2006. All patients were stratified by D'Amico risk classification. The independent predictor of biochemical recurrence was determined in each risk group., Results: Of all 468 patients, 171 patients showed biochemical recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 53 months. The 5-year estimated biochemical recurrence-free survival rates in the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups were 77.3, 71.3, and 46.3%, respectively. The multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazard model showed that patient age in the low-risk group, seminal vesicle involvement in the intermediate-risk group, and prostate-specific antigen value at diagnosis, surgical Gleason score, percent positive core, and perineural invasion in the high-risk group were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence., Conclusions: The high-risk patients showed a significant higher biochemical recurrence than the low- and intermediate-risk patients. The independent predictor of biochemical recurrence was different in each risk group.

We examined the usefulness of the volume-adjusted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) parameters for prediction of T1c prostate cancer on 210 patients who had abnormal PSA levels but no abnormal findings in digital transrectal examination (DRE) or transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). PSA, prostate volume (PV), transition zone volume (TZV), PSAD (PSA/PV) and PSATZD (PSA/TZV) were assessed with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC). Simple and stepwise logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratios of these parameters. Fifty-three (25.2%) of all 210 patients and 31 (19.9%) of 156 patients with intermediate PSA levels had biopsy-proved prostate cancer. The ROC curves of all patients revealed that PSA, PV, TZV, PSAD and PSATZD had significant predictive values, while AUCs of PV, PSAD and PSATZD had significant predictive values as compared to that of PSA. In the patients with intermediate PSA levels, the ROC curves revealed that PV, TZV, PSAD and PSATZD had significant predictive values, but there were no significant differences in AUCs among these parameters. The stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that PV and PSATZD were significant predictive parameters in all patients and that PSATZD was the only significant predictive parameter in the patients with intermediate PSA levels. In conclusion, not only PSAD and PSATZD but also PV and TZV had significant predictive values in discriminating prostate cancer. However, the multivariate analysis showed that PSATZD had the strongest predictive value in all patients and in those with intermediate PSA levels.

Simple Summary: The efficacy of abiraterone plus prednisolone (ABI) against nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains unclear. To evaluate enzalutamide and ABI as the first-line treatment for CRPC, we conducted the randomized controlled trial including both metastatic and nonmetastatic CRPC. As a sub-analysis, we focused on nonmetastatic CRPC in this study. ABI and enzalutamide had similar efficacy and safety profiles in patients with nonmetastatic CRPC. Enzalutamide (ENZ) and abiraterone plus prednisolone (ABI) can improve the survival of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, the agent that is more effective against nonmetastatic CRPC remains unclear. To evaluate the agent that can be used as the first-line treatment for CRPC, an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (ENABLE Study for PCa) including both metastatic and nonmetastatic CRPC was conducted in Japan. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, overall survival, some essential survival endpoints, and safety of patients with nonmetastatic CRPC were also analyzed. In this subanalysis, 15 and 26 patients in the ENZ and ABI arms, respectively, presented with nonmetastatic CRPC. There was no significant difference in terms of the PSA response rate between the ENZ and ABI arms (80% and 64%, respectively; p = 0.3048). The overall survival did not significantly differ between the two arms (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.22–2.14, p = 0.5260). No significant differences were observed in terms of radiographic progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival between the ENZ and ABI arms (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.35–1.84; p = 0.6056 and HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.19–2.73; p = 0.6443, respectively). Only four and six patients in the ENZ and ABI arms, respectively, had ≥grade 3 adverse events. ABI and ENZ had similar efficacy and safety profiles in patients with nonmetastatic CRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We compared the oncological outcomes of patients who received seed brachytherapy (SEED-BT) with those who received radical prostatectomy (RP) for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.Methods: Candidates were patients treated with either SEED-BT (n = 933) or RP (n = 334). One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to adjust the patients' backgrounds. We compared the biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free rate using the Phoenix definition (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] nadir plus 2 ng/mL) for SEED-BT and the surgical definition (PSA cut-off value of 0.2 ng/mL) for RP. We also directly compared the BCR-free rates using the same PSA cut-off value of 0.2 ng/mL for both SEED-BT and RP.Results: In the propensity score-matched analysis with 214 pairs, the median follow-up treatment was 96 months (range 1-158 months). Fifty-three patients (24.7%) were treated with combined SEED-BT and external-beam radiotherapy. Forty-three patients (20.0%) received salvage radiotherapy after RP. Comparing the BCR-free rate using the above definitions for SEED-BT and RP showed that SEED-BT yielded a significantly better 8-year BCR-free rate than did RP (87.4% vs. 74.3%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.420, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.273-0.647). Comparing the 8-year BCR-free rate using the surgical definition for both treatments showed no significant difference between the two treatments (76.7% vs. 74.3%, HR 0.913, 95% CI 0.621-1.341). SEED-BT had a significantly better 8-year salvage hormonal therapy-free rate than did RP (92.0% vs. 85.6%, HR 0.528, 95% CI 0.296-0.942, P = 0.030). The 8-year metastasis-free survival rates (98.5% vs. 99.0%, HR 1.382, 95% CI 0.313-6.083, P = 0.668) and overall survival rates (91.9% vs. 94.6%, HR 1.353, 95% CI 0.690-2.650) did not significantly differ between the treatments.Conclusions: The BCR-free rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with SEED-BT and those treated with RP for intermediate-risk prostate cancer even when they were directly compared using the surgical definition for BCR. SEED-BT and RP can be adequately compared for oncological outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the use of cyclooxygenase‐2 inhibitors in patients receiving low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Methods: A total of 310 patients with prostate cancer (cT1c‐3aN0M0) who received low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy between May 2010 and July 2013 were enrolled and allocated to one of the two treatment groups (tamsulosin alone 0.2 mg/day for 6 months vs tamsulosin 0.2 mg/day for 6 months plus celecoxib 200 mg/day for 3 months). The primary end‐point was the chronological change in international prostate symptom score, and the number of patients was assessed for the primary end‐point. Biochemical recurrence‐free, cancer‐specific survival and overall survival rates 5 years after the last patient received low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy were retrospectively examined. Results: The median follow‐up period after low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy was 72.0 months (range 3–99 months). A total of 12 (3.9%) patients experienced biochemical recurrence. The biochemical recurrence‐free rate in the celecoxib group (5‐year biochemical recurrence‐free rate 98.5%) was significantly better (log–rank test P = 0.023, 95% confidence interval 0.07–0.63, hazard ratio 0.20) than that in the tamsulosin group (5‐year biochemical recurrence‐free rate 93.4%). None of the patients died from prostate cancer. However, 14 (4.5%) patients died of other causes. No significant difference was observed in terms of overall survival between the celecoxib and tamsulosin groups. Conclusions: The combination of cyclooxygenase‐2 inhibitor and low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy can contribute to a better biochemical control of prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Klotho (KL) gene was first identified as a potent aging suppressor. The KL family currently comprises of three proteins: α-Klotho (KLA), β-Klotho (KLB), and γ-Klotho (KLG). Many studies have shown that KLA and KLB participate in tumor progression or suppression, depending on the type of cancer; however, the relationship between KLG and prostate cancer has not yet been studied. Some studies have claimed that KL is correlated to sensitivity to chemotherapy. Here, we investigated the oncogenic potential of KLG in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Immunohistochemical analysis using prostate biopsy specimens revealed that patients with high KLG expression in primary prostate cancer tissue had a significantly poor prognosis for overall survival. In addition, the prostate-specific antigen response rate after docetaxel (DTX) therapy in patients with high KLG expression was lower than that in patients with low KLG expression. To evaluate the potential of KLG as a therapeutic target in human prostate cancer, we generated a xenograft model of human CRPC cell line (PC-3) in male athymic mice. The animals were randomly divided into four groups as follows: i) control group (vehicle only); ii) DTX group (intraperitoneal administration); iii) small interfering RNA targeting KLG (KLG siRNA) group (intratumoral administration); and iv) a combination group (DTX plus KLG siRNA). After 3 weeks of treatment, the tumor weight and tumor Ki-67 labeling index were significantly lower in the KLG siRNA group and the combination group than in the control group. Sensitivity to DTX was increased upon treatment with KLG siRNA. These findings suggest that KLG expression in primary prostate cancer lesions is associated with resistance to DTX in CRPC and has potential as a diagnostic and therapeutic target for patients with CRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The history of prostate brachytherapy has passed one century. In 1983, modern low‐dose‐rate prostate brachytherapy using a transrectal ultrasound‐guided procedure was introduced. In the early 1990s, low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy was introduced and rapidly spread across the USA due to its excellent oncological control, cost‐effectiveness and technically easy procedure. Since low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy was introduced in Japan (2003), over 15 years have passed. More than 43 000 patients have undergone low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy. Japanese urologists and radiation oncologists are on course with leading brachytherapists in the USA. A nationwide prospective cohort study, J‐POPS, was initiated in 2005. The J‐POPS group also provides educational programs including an annual novel training course in low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy to familiarize urologists, radiation oncologists and pathologists with the procedure. Important information on Japanese patients has accumulated, especially by the J‐POPS study group. The Japanese investigators reported excellent oncological outcomes of low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy, showing equivalent or superior efficacy to surgery in low‐ to intermediate‐risk patients, and superior efficacy in high‐risk patients using the surgery biochemical recurrence definition (prostate‐specific antigen cut‐off value of 0.2 ng/mL). Two randomized controlled studies (SHIP study: intermediate risk, and TRIP study: high risk) carried out by the J‐POPS group are ongoing, and an additional follow‐up study (J‐POPS 2 study) has been started to evaluate survival outcomes over longer follow‐up periods. Low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy is expected to provide a survival benefit, which must be confirmed by further studies with longer follow‐up periods in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Investigating oncological outcomes in patients registered in the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) in terms of biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) by the Phoenix and the newly developed J-POPS definitions, exploration of predictive factors for bRFS, and preliminary verification of pitfalls of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure definitions.Methods: Between July 2005 and June 2007, 2316 clinically localized patients underwent permanent seed implantation. The primary endpoint was bRFS. One of the secondary endpoints was overall survival (OS).Results: The median age was 69 and performance status was 0 in 99.1% of participants. The median biologically effective dose (BED) was about 180 Gy2. During a median follow-up of 60.0 months, 8.4 and 5.9% had PSA failure by the Phoenix and the J-POPS definitions, respectively. The 5-year bRFSs based on the Phoenix and the J-POPS definitions were 89.1 and 91.6%, respectively. The 5-year OS was 97.3%. According to multivariate analyses, only age affected bRFS based on the Phoenix definition, whereas the risk group and BED independently affected bRFS based on the J-POPS definition. A spontaneous PSA decrease was seen in 91.1% of participants after PSA failure based on the Phoenix definition alone, but in only 22.2% after PSA failure based on the J-POPS definition alone.Conclusion: The world’s largest registration study, J-POPS, consisted of patients with longevity, and a highly quality-controlled BED resulted in excellent bRFS and OS. The high likelihood of PSA bounce by the Phoenix definition should be taken into account, especially in younger patients.Clinical trial information: NCT00534196. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Both enzalutamide and abiraterone have demonstrated improved radiographic progression-free and overall survival for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) compared with placebo controls before docetaxel treatment in phase III studies. These oral agents target androgen and androgen receptor signaling and are thought to be less toxic than chemotherapy. Cross-resistance to these agents was recently reported because of their similar mechanism of action, and it is important to assess which agent is more effective to use initially for CRPC.Methods/design: The present study is a phase III, investigator-initiated, multicenter, head-to-head, randomized controlled trial investigating enzalutamide vs. abiraterone as a first-line treatment for CRPC patients. Patients will be randomly assigned to an enzalutamide or an abiraterone treatment group. The primary endpoint is the time to prostate-specific antigen progression. The target sample size is set at 100 patients per group (total, 200 patients). The study duration is 5 years, and the duration for recruitment is 2 years and 6 months.Discussion: Thus far, there have been no prospective head-to-head studies comparing enzalutamide and abiraterone. This ENABLE study will clarify which agent should be prioritized for CRPC patients and enable clinicians to decide the appropriate treatment before chemotherapy.Trial Registration: University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center identifier UMIN000015529 . Registrated 11/1/2014. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the combined use of the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as an assessment tool for urinary symptom flare after iodine-125 (125I) implant brachytherapy. The association between urinary symptom flare and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce was investigated.Methods: Changes in the IPSS and OABSS were prospectively recorded in 355 patients who underwent seed implantation. The percentage distribution of patients according to the difference between the flare peak and post-implant nadir was plotted to define significant increases in the scores. The clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment parameters, and post-implant dosimetric parameters were compared between the non-flare and flare groups. PSA bounce was defined as an elevation of ≥0.1 ng/mL or ≥0.4 ng/mL compared to the previous lowest value, followed by a decrease to a level at or below the pre-bounce value.Results: A clinically significant increase required an IPSS increase of at least 12 points and an OABSS increase of at least 6 points based on a time-course analysis of total scores and the QOL index. Assessment only by IPSS failed to detect 40 patients (11%) who had urinary symptom flare according to the OABSS. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that patients treated with higher biologically effective doses and those without diabetes mellitus had higher risks of urinary flare. There was no statistical correlation between the incidence and time of urinary symptom flare onset and that of a PSA bounce.Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report to prove the clinical potential of the OABSS as an assessment tool for urinary symptom flare after seed implantation. Our findings showed that persistent lower urinary tract symptoms after seed implantation were attributed to storage rather than to voiding issues. We believe that assessment with the OABSS combined with the IPSS would aid in decision-making in terms of timing, selection of a treatment intervention, and assessment of the outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We evaluated the cancer detection rate of prostate cancer using transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy aimed at sampling one core for each milliliter of prostate volume for patients requiring repeated prostate biopsies.Methods: In total, 103 consecutive patients with repeated prostate biopsies were enrolled in this retrospective study. The number of biopsy cores was defined by prostate volume. In principle, one biopsy core covered 1 mL of prostate volume. We used a prostate brachytherapy template with a 5-mm grid and adopted a transperineal needle biopsy.Results: The median age, prostate-specific antigen level, and prostate volume were 69 (range, 37-83) years, 9.2 (range, 1.9-107) ng/mL, and 34.7 (range, 18-76.7) mL, respectively. The median number of biopsy cores was 37 (range, 18-75 cores). Fifty-three patients (51.5%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer. The Gleason score was 6, 7, and 8-10 in 24.5, 64.2 and 11.3% patients, respectively. Forty-two patients (79.2%) were diagnosed with clinically significant PCa. Acute urinary retention was detected in 2 patients (1.9%).Conclusions: Transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy with one core per milliliter of prostate volume helped achieve a high cancer detection rate and high significant cancer detection rate with acceptable biopsy-associated adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, the author discusses the innovation of prostate cancer screening by using prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The author states that the clinical trail of PSA led to a stage migration in patients with prostate cancer and the number of patients with early-stage prostate cancer. As it is mentioned in the discussion, the total number of patients in the present study was relatively small and the proportion of nerve-spared patients were also small.

This phase 3 randomized investigation was designed to determine whether 30 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was superior to 6 months of ADT when combined with brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for localized high-risk prostate cancer. This study was conducted at 37 hospitals on men aged 40 to 79 years, with stage T2c-3a, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, or Gleason score >7, who received 6 months of ADT combined with iodine-125 brachytherapy followed by EBRT. After stratification, patients were randomly assigned to either no further treatment (short arm) or 24 months of adjuvant ADT (long arm). According to the Phoenix definition of failure, the primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of biochemical progression. Secondary endpoints included clinical progression, metastasis, salvage treatment, disease-specific mortality, overall survival, and grade 3+ adverse events. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted using survival estimates determined using competing risk analyses. Of 332 patients, 165 and 167 were randomly assigned to the short and long arms, respectively. The median follow-up period was 9.2 years. The cumulative incidence of biochemical progression at 7 years was 9.0% (95% CI, 5.5-14.5) and 8.0% (4.7-13.5) in the short and long arms, respectively (P =.65). The outcomes of secondary endpoints did not differ significantly between the arms. Incidence rates of endocrine- and radiation-related grade 3+ adverse events for the short versus long arms were 0.6 versus 1.8% (P =.62) and 1.2 versus 0.6% (P =.62), respectively. Both treatment arms showed similar efficacy among selected populations with high-risk features. The toxicity of the trimodal therapy was acceptable. The present investigation, designed as a superiority trial, failed to demonstrate that 30-month ADT yielded better biochemical control than 6-month ADT when combined with brachytherapy and EBRT. Therefore, a noninferiority study is warranted to obtain further evidence supporting these preliminary results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]