Search

Objective We aimed to investigate the association between the different antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and both systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) manifestations. Methods Patients from the RELESSER registry, a Spanish retrospective, cross-sectional, forty-five hospital registry of adult SLE patients, were included. Results Out of a total of 3,658 SLE patients, 1372 were aPL positive (555 of them fulfilled criteria for APS). All aPL types showed a negative association with cutaneous SLE manifestations. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) and anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) were both associated with haematological, ophthalmological and neuropsychiatric manifestations. IgG isotypes were associated with a higher risk of lupus manifestations compared with IgM. We found that the risk of neuropsychiatric and ophthalmological manifestations significantly increased with a higher number of positive aPL whereas the risk of cutaneous symptoms showed a negative correlation. All types of aPL, and more strongly LA, were associated with non-criteria antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) manifestations such as thrombocytopenia and haemolytic anaemia. Moreover, LA and aCL (particularly IgG isotype) were also associated with Libman-Sacks endocarditis and cognitive impairment. This association was stronger with more than one positive aPL. All types of aPL were also associated with classic APS manifestations, although LA, IgG isotypes, and patients with more than one aPL displayed a higher risk. Conclusion There is a hierarchy for aPL and the risk of APS and SLE manifestations. aCL, and especially LA, confer a higher risk for major organ involvement in SLE. IgG isotypes seem to have a more important role. The load of aPL confer a higher risk for APS and certain SLE manifestations.

espanolEl registro de lupus de la Sociedad Espanola de Reumatologia (RELESSER) es un registro multicentrico de pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistemico seguidos en servicios de reumatologia espanoles, que contiene cuantiosa informacion sobre 4.024 pacientes. Hasta la fecha han sido publicados 14 analisis sobre la fase transversal del registro. Se describen los resultados mas relevantes, a criterio de los autores, concernientes a las caracteristicas clinicas acumuladas, nivel de actividad, tratamientos, refractariedad, dano y mortalidad. Se revisan asimismo los resultados de analisis especificos sobre el lupus incompleto, la nefritis lupica, las manifestaciones respiratorias, los eventos cardiovasculares, las infecciones graves, las neoplasias, la fibromialgia, el lupus en varones, el lupus en latinoamericanos y el lupus de inicio juvenil, comparando los diferentes subgrupos con el total de la cohorte. RELESSER se ha constituido como uno de los registros clinicos de lupus eritematoso sistemico mas importantes del mundo, resultando altamente productivo en terminos de generacion de conocimiento de la enfermedad en pacientes espanoles, util tambien para toda la comunidad cientifica. EnglishThe lupus register of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (RELESSER) is a multicentre register of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) under follow-up by Spanish Rheumatology Services. It contains data on a total of 4024 patients with SLE. So far, 14 studies have been published from the transversal phase of RELESSER. Here we report the more relevant contributions of those studies, according to the authors’ perspective, concerning cumulative clinical characteristics, level of activity, treatments, refractory disease, damage and mortality. We also review the main results of the analysis regarding incomplete SLE, lupus nephritis, respiratory manifestations, cardiovascular disease, serious infection, malignancies, fibromyalgia, SLE in males, SLE in Hispanics and juvenile-onset SLE, comparing the main characteristics of each subgroup to the global cohort. RELESSER has become one of the most important clinical SLE registers around the world, with a high yield in terms of knowledge generation about the disease in Spain, also useful for the entire scientific community.

The lupus register of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (RELESSER) is a multicentre register of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) under follow-up by Spanish Rheumatology Services. It contains data on a total of 4024 patients with SLE. So far, 14 studies have been published from the transversal phase of RELESSER. Here we report the more relevant contributions of those studies, according to the authors' perspective, concerning cumulative clinical characteristics, level of activity, treatments, refractory disease, damage and mortality. We also review the main results of the analysis regarding incomplete SLE, lupus nephritis, respiratory manifestations, cardiovascular disease, serious infection, malignancies, fibromyalgia, SLE in males, SLE in Hispanics and juvenile-onset SLE, comparing the main characteristics of each subgroup to the global cohort. RELESSER has become one of the most important clinical SLE registers around the world, with a high yield in terms of knowledge generation about the disease in Spain, also useful for the entire scientific community.

Objective To describe in detail an innovative program based on telemedicine for semi-automated prioritization of referrals from Primary Care (PC) to Rheumatology, for reproducibility purposes, and to present the results of the implementation study. Methods The context and situation were carefully analyzed, paying attention to all processes in place, referral numbers, waiting times, and number of complementary tests prior to discharge from Rheumatology. The composition of the team, aims, users, scope, and implementation phases were defined. Eight process indicators were established and measured before and 32 months after the program implementation. Results The program, which includes IT circuits, algorithms based on response to specific guideline-based checklists, e-consultation, and appointments based on priority, was fully implemented in our health area after a pilot study in two PC centers. After implementation, 6185 rheumatology referrals showed an e-consultation response delay of 8.95 days, and to first face-to-face visit (after e-consultation) of 12.6 (previous delay before program implementation was 83.1 days). Resolution by e-consultation reached 20% (1195 patients did not need seeing the rheumatologist to have the problem solved), and 1369 patients (32%) were discharged after the first visit. The overall resolution rate was 44.0% (2564 discharges/5830 e-consultations). From a random sample of 100 visits, only 10% of patients needed additional complementary tests to make a diagnosis and decision by Rheumatology (20.9% decrease from previous period). Conclusion A careful analysis of the situation and processes, with implementation of simple IT circuits, allows for the improvement of the efficiency and resolution of problems in Rheumatology.

Objectives To assess the characteristics and risk of lymphoma in a large cohort of patients with SLE. Methods A case–cohort analysis was performed within a dynamic cohort of SLE patients from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Registry (RELESSER). Clinical and analytical features were compared between the lymphoma SLE group and the control SLE group using an independent-sample Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables with Fisher’s exact test if necessary. The multivariate analysis was based on a generalized linear model. Results Twenty-one patients with SLE and lymphoma and 3965 non-lymphoma controls with SLE were studied. Most lymphomas were of B cell origin (n = 15/21), with diffuse large B cell lymphoma being the most frequent histological type (8/21, 38.1%). As in the general population, the risk of lymphoma in SLE was higher in male than in female patients and increased with age. In the lymphoma SLE group, bivariate analysis showed a significantly higher percentage of pericarditis, organic brain syndrome, seizures, vasculitis, haemolytic anaemia, splenomegaly, venous thrombosis and mean modified (excluding lymphoma) SLICC/ACR damage index. In contrast, renal involvement, positive anti-dsDNA, and antimalarials ever were less frequent. Conclusions In this large multicentre Spanish cohort, we identified characteristics of SLE that are associated with a higher risk of lymphoma. Antimalarials were significantly negatively associated with risk of lymphoma in SLE patients. Nevertheless, further prospective studies are needed to clarify these findings.

The aim of the study was to assess the direct costs for the Spanish Health System of patients with chronic inflammatory arthropathies treated with biological therapies in daily clinical practice and to establish possible factors associated with lower costs.A descriptive, observational and retrospective study was conducted. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis who started a biological therapy between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2016 were included. Variables related to socioeconomic status, disease and biological therapy were included. The annual cost of biological treatment and other direct medical costs were calculated for each disease. The analysis of costs was based on the National Health Service perspective. The time horizon comprised the 8-year long study period.A total of 422 biological therapy lines were analysed. The annual biological therapy cost per patient was €12,494±3,865 for rheumatoid arthritis, €11,248±2,763 for ankylosing spondylitis and €12,263±35,155 for psoriatic arthritis (p=0.008). The cost of biological therapies entailed about 80% of the total cost of these diseases. Hospital admission was a factor which contributed to an increasing cost in all these conditions. A longer duration of the biological therapy was associated with lower cost in all the diseases.The cost of ankylosing spondylitis is lower than that of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. The biological therapy is the factor with the highest impact on the overall cost of these diseases. Preventing hospital admissions and a higher persistence to the biological therapy can contribute to lower costs for the system.

Muscular symptoms, which may be due to multiple causes, are one of the most common early complaints in a rheumatology practice. Musculoskeletal symptoms in rheumatic conditions are very varied, ranging from mechanical problems to muscular symptoms derived from inflammatory and systemic autoimmune diseases. Several drugs commonly used by different specialists and certain drugs used in rheumatology can also cause a wide variety of muscle symptoms. A description of different systemic autoimmune diseases follows to describe the different forms of involvement of the musculoskeletal system that they cause, as well as the main causes with which a differential diagnosis should be made. In this chapter, we will try to give some clues to reach an early diagnosis using clinical criteria, particularly based on a directed anamnesis and physical examination, discussing possible guidelines for the complimentary tests that may be required in patients with muscle complaints.

Author(s): Clowse, Megan EB; Wallace, Daniel J; Furie, Richard A; Petri, Michelle A; Pike, Marilyn C; Leszczynski, Piotr; Neuwelt, C Michael; Hobbs, Kathryn; Keiserman, Mauro; Duca, Liliana; Kalunian, Kenneth C; Galateanu, Catrinel; Bongardt, Sabine; Stach, Christian; Beaudot, Carolyn; Kilgallen, Brian; Gordon, Caroline; EMBODY Investigator Group | Abstract: ObjectiveEpratuzumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets CD22, modulates B cell signaling without substantial reductions in the number of B cells. The aim of this study was to report the results of 2 phase III multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, the EMBODY 1 and EMBODY 2 trials, assessing the efficacy and safety of epratuzumab in patients with moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsPatients met ≥4 of the American College of Rheumatology revised classification criteria for SLE, were positive for antinuclear antibodies and/or anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, had an SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score of ≥6 (increased disease activity), had British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 index (BILAG-2004) scores of grade A (severe disease activity) in ≥1 body system or grade B (moderate disease activity) in ≥2 body systems (in the mucocutaneous, musculoskeletal, or cardiorespiratory domains), and were receiving standard therapy, including mandatory treatment with corticosteroids (5-60 mg/day). BILAG-2004 grade A scores in the renal and central nervous system domains were excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive either placebo, epratuzumab 600 mg every week, or epratuzumab 1,200 mg every other week, with infusions delivered for the first 4 weeks of each 12-week dosing cycle, for 4 cycles. Patients across all 3 treatment groups also continued with their standard therapy. The primary end point was the response rate at week 48 according to the BILAG-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) definition, requiring improvement in the BILAG-2004 score, no worsening in the BILAG-2004 score, SLEDAI-2K score, or physician's global assessment of disease activity, and no disallowed changes in concomitant medications. Patients who discontinued the study medication were classified as nonresponders.ResultsIn the EMBODY 1 and EMBODY 2 trials of epratuzumab, 793 patients and 791 patients, respectively, were randomized, 786 (99.1%) and 788 (99.6%), respectively, received study medication, and 528 (66.6%) and 533 (67.4%), respectively, completed the study. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary end point between the groups, with the week 48 BICLA response rates being similar between the epratuzumab groups and the placebo group (response rates ranging from 33.5% to 39.8%). No new safety signals were identified.ConclusionIn patients with moderate or severely active SLE, treatment with epratuzumab + standard therapy did not result in improvements in response rates over that observed in the placebo + standard therapy group.