Search

Copyright of Journal History of Latin American Education / Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana is the property of Universidad Pedagogica y Tecnologica de Colombia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Prudentia Iuris is the property of Pontificia Universidad Catolica Argentina and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista CES Derecho is the property of Universidad CES and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Justicia (0124-7441) is the property of Universidad Simon Bolivar and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Prometeo Conocimiento Científico is the property of Puerto Madero Editorial Academica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Politica y Sociedad is the property of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Historia Constitucional is the property of Revista Historia Constitucional and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Chilena de Derecho is the property of Revista Chilena de Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The aim of this essay is to analyse the mechanisms for guaranteeing the right to a minimum subsistence level or right to existence in the context of a crisis of the labour society. Recent transformations in the labour market have led to a questioning of formal employment as the backbone of society and have distanced it from its historical role as an instrument for self-realisation and social insertion. This text begins by addressing the legal foundations of the universality of social rights, as well as the idea of the right to work as a guarantee of the effectiveness of other fundamental rights. It then analyses the limitations of the Spanish system of social benefits and the disadvantages of linking social provisions to employment requirements. Finally, it explores the proposal of the Universal Basic Income (UBI) and the criticisms about its ethical viability, paying close attention to its effects on the labour market and compatibility with the principle of reciprocity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peasant women fall under structures of oppression that perpetuate traditional roles of the predominant patriarchal system in the countryside. In them, a double role relapses: the production of the land and the care-work, without being recognized socially, legally, or economically. Thus, although Human Rights include a right to work, following legal feminism, it has colonial and androcentric foundations, since its point of enunciation of the human is the salaried white man. This paper seeks to answer: in what way the emancipatory role of law enables social and legal transformation for the protection of peasant women’s right to work? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: the purpose of this document is to support the need to reform the Federal Labor Law in Mexico to provide the protection required to the Elderly Population (PAM by its acronym in Spanish), based on the theoretical position of Bauman (2004) on the fluidity of relationships, which implies the full exercise of their human and social rights, while achieving harmony between the international and domestic legal framework. Methodology: the research is of a theoretical-documentary nature; the proposal is of an analytical-argumentative nature based on the deductive and exegetical method. The first step of the procedure that follows is the identification of the subject under study based on the legal approach, which determines for whom the right to work should be recognized and protected. The next step seeks to draw the PAM in Mexico based on their characteristics, through official statistics, in order to establish the vulnerability that this age generates in relation to other age groups. Subsequently, a review of human rights legislation at three levels -- universal, regional, and domestic -- is carried out to determine which rights are recognized. This opens the door to demonstrate that the right to work is a human and social right enshrined and protected in the three normative spheres; thus, the analysis of the right to work in Mexican legislation is made possible, which produces the inputs to build the arguments of the conclusions. Results: among the results obtained are the lack of harmonization of Mexican labor legislation regarding the protection of the PAM as a worker, which produces a systemic transgression of their fundamental rights. Conclusions: one of the conclusions reached is that the neoliberal orientation of the rule of law in contemporary Mexico has led to the disarticulation between the right to work of PAMs and public institutions, which has resulted in their invisibility, precariousness, and violation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores is the property of Dilemas Contemporaneos: Educacion, Politica y Valores and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Iustitia is the property of Universidad Santo Tomas, Bucaramanga and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Internacional y Comparada de Relaciones Laborales y Derecho del Empleo is the property of ADAPT University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Los autores analizan cómo los órganos interamericanos de derechos humanos utilizan las normas de la OIT como referencia en asuntos de libertad sindical y de asociación y derechos de los pueblos indígenas. Exponen los límites del método por litispendencia y competencia y analizan cómo estas normas han influido en la reciente jurisprudencia interamericana sobre ciertos derechos económicos, sociales y culturales. Defienden la conveniencia de este método de referencias cruzadas, que permite a los órganos interamericanos basarse en interpretaciones autorizadas, al tiempo que aumenta la credibilidad, la legitimidad normativa y la universalidad de sus decisiones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores is the property of Dilemas Contemporaneos: Educacion, Politica y Valores and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Internacional y Comparada de Relaciones Laborales y Derecho del Empleo is the property of ADAPT University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of e-Revista Internacional de la Protección Social is the property of e-Revista Internacional de la Proteccion Social and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This article values the current importance of work rights, reflected in the speech on human rights and the protective normative relief it has generated. Based on this speech, people deprived of freedom are holders of rights. The purpose of this analysis is to discuss work rights under a criminological approach linked to education, culture and recreation, which allows the respect and dignity to be distinguished and studied from the perspective of fundamental rights. In conclusion, criminology and victimology contribute to understand the work environment of inmates and their links. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resumen: Se argumenta que la corriente económica dominante constituye uno de los principales factores por los que el derecho humano al trabajo, reconocido en 1966 por la comunidad internacional, parece no haberse tomado en serio. En el discurso dominante el trabajo es un costo; el empleo, un objetivo de segunda categoría; las personas, recursos con especificaciones productivas, y los derechos, rigideces. Una economía política basada en los derechos humanos que pretenda asegurar el derecho al trabajo debe interpretarlo más allá de la mera lucha contra el desempleo, entender el pleno empleo como un fin en sí mismo y situar al individuo en el centro de su razón de ser. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Spanish Constitution of 1978 does not expressly recognize the right to free access to quality employment services. This legal deficiency produces great perplexity because it is a fundamental social right consolidated in the European system for the protection of human rights. These services, in the context of a country with an endemic high unemployment rate, such as the Spanish case, have an important role to play in improving the labor market balance, offering more and better employment opportunities. The challenges posed In the debate on its necessary modernization are of great magnitude. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study intends to determine the best interests of children and adolescent workers in Venezuela. This objective is approached according to a documentary research strategy, supported by the analytic research method. Sources for collecting information come from four areas: constitutional, legal, sublegal and doctrinal. Children and adolescents, due to their condition of vulnerability, are protected by legislation, organisms, agencies and special courts corresponding to the State, the families and society, designed to assure, with absolute priority and integral protection, their best interests in the decisions and actions that concern them. This special protection covers even the right to work for children and adolescents who cannot be submitted to economic exploitation or the performance of any tasks that could interfere with their education, be dangerous or harmful to their health or their integral development. According to Convention number 182 of the International Labor Organization (ILO), the so-called worst forms of child labor ought to be prohibited and eliminated, but not work that fosters the physical, mental and social well-being of the children and adolescents, since both their best interests as well as work are human rights recognized and guaranteed by Venezuelan law. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Estudios Internacionales is the property of Instituto de Estudios Internacionales de la Universidad de Chile and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The thesis of the present paper is to support that the lack of continuity on public policies has affected the legal application of the legitimate expectations principle, which often is considered such as the best tool in order to solve, through relocation, the tension between public space protection and the right to work entitled to the peddlers and itinerant vendors. Because of that, on the following text there is a call for reflection directed to the state (legislators, local governors and judges) and to the citizens, in order to rethink the meaning of the above mentioned principle and its scope as well as in establishing the right way of applying it; a right way to the tension among rights, instead of looking forward particular benefits (even abusing of the good faith principle), from the uncertainty that generates disparity of public policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]