Search

Objective: To estimate the effect of treatment duration on in-hospital mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus blood stream infection and demonstrate the biases that can arise when immortal-time bias is ignored., Exposure: We compared three treatment strategies: short therapy (<10 days), intermediate (10-18 days) and long (>18 days)., Main Outcome Measures: Twenty-eight-day all-cause in-hospital mortality., Methods: Using data from the BSI-FOO study, we implemented an approach proposed by Hernán to overcome confounding and immortal-time biases. The first stage is to clone all participants, so that each participant is assigned to each treatment strategy. Second, observations are censored when their data becomes inconsistent with their assigned strategy. Finally, inverse-probability weights are applied to adjust for potential selection. We compared our results to a naïve approach where immortal-time bias is ignored., Results: Of the 1903 participants in BSI-FOO, 587 were eligible and included in the analysis. After cloning, the weighted estimates of hazard ratio of mortality for short versus long therapy was 1.74 (95% CI 1.36, 2.24) and for intermediate versus long therapy was 1.09 (0.98, 1.22). In the naïve approach, the hazard ratios with reference to the long therapy group are 37.4 (95% CI 18.9 to 74.4) in the short therapy group and 4.1 (95% CI 1.9 to 8.9) in the intermediate therapy group., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that duration of therapy >18 days is beneficial with respect to 28-day in-hospital mortality, however, there remains uncertainty around the efficacy of reducing duration of treatment to 10-18 days., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

An in vitro single-compartment dilutional pharmacokinetic model was used to study the pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus (both methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA] and methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]). Mean serum free concentrations of ceftaroline (the active metabolite of the prodrug ceftaroline fosamil) dosed in humans at 600 mg every 12 h (q12h) were simulated, and activities against 12 S. aureus strains (3 MSSA strains and 9 MRSA strains, 3 of which had a vancomycin-intermediate phenotype) were determined. Ceftaroline produced 2.5- to 4.0-log10-unit reductions in viable counts by 24 h with all strains and a 0.5- to 4.0-log-unit drop in counts at 96 h. The antibacterial effect could not be related to the strain MIC across the ceftaroline MIC range from 0.12 to 2.0 μg/ml. In dose-ranging studies, the cumulative percentage of a 24-h period that the free drug concentration exceeded the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions (fT(MIC)) of 24.5% ± 8.9% was associated with a 24-h bacteriostatic effect, one of 27.8% ± 9.5% was associated with a -1-log-unit drop, and one of 32.1% ± 8.1% was associated with a -2-log-unit drop. The MSSA and MRSA strains had similar fT(MIC) values. fT(MIC) values increased with increasing duration of exposure up to 96 h. Changes in ceftaroline population analysis profiles were related to fT(MIC). fT(MIC)s of <50% were associated with growth on 4× MIC recovery plates at 96 h of drug exposure. These data support the use of ceftaroline fosamil at doses of 600 mg q12h to treat S. aureus strains with MICs of ≤ 2 μg/ml. An fT(MIC) of 25 to 30% would make a suitable pharmacodynamic index target, but fTMIC values of ≥ 50% are needed to suppress the emergence of resistance and require clinical evaluation.

The antibacterial effects (ABE) of tomopenem (formerly RO4908463/CS-023) against seven Staphylococcus aureus strains (methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] strain tomopenem MICs, 0.5 to 16 mg/liter; methicillin-sensitive S. aureus [MSSA] strain tomopenem MIC, 0.06 mg/liter) were studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model. Initially, two human doses were simulated, 750 mg every 8 hours (8hly) and 1,500 mg 8hly intravenously, using S. aureus at a standard inoculum of 10(6) CFU/ml. There was a rapid clearance of bacteria from the model by 12 h after drug exposure with most strains. Clearance was not related to the tomopenem MIC. The ABE of these two tomopenem dose regimens were also tested at a high inoculum, 10(8) CFU/ml; in all simulations, there was a >4-log drop in viable count at 24 h. Strains were not cleared from the model at 10(8) CFU/ml, in contrast to what was seen for the standard inoculum. When the ABE of tomopenem at 750 mg 8hly was compared to those of vancomycin, tomopenem was seen to have a superior effect, as measured by the area under the bacterial kill curve at 24 h (AUBKC24) and 48 h (P < 0.05). Dose ranging studies were performed to provide time-above-MIC (T>MIC) drug exposures of 0 to 100% (8 to 10 doses per strain) with five MRSA/MSSA strains. The T>MIC for a 24-h bacteriostatic effect was 8% +/- 5% (range, 1.3% to 15.4%); the T>MIC for a 4-log drop in viable count was 32% +/- 18% (range, 12.8% to 36.2%). The T>MIC for a 90% maximum response using AUBKC24 as ABE was 24.9% +/- 15.7%. Inoculum had little impact on T>MIC exposures for ABE. There was emergence of resistance to tomopenem in the dose ranging studies, with increased growth of subpopulations on plates containing tomopenem at 2x and 4x the MIC compared to what was seen for preexposure population analysis at T>MICs of <20%. The pharmacodynamics of tomopenem against S. aureus is similar to those of other members of the carbapenem class, with the exception that MRSA is included. These data indicate that tomopenem will have clinically useful activity against MRSA at T>MICs achievable in humans.

Glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (GISA) and heterogeneous GISA (hGISA) strains are notoriously difficult to detect in the diagnostic laboratory. The clinical importance of GISA, and particularly hGISA, will only be obvious when a definitive detection method is available. A few novel GISA and hGISA detection methods have been proposed; however, their validity has never been tested on a significant scale and in different laboratories. This study compares three screening methods for detecting GISA and hGISA strains in 12 laboratories, using a blind panel of 48 strains with known glycopeptide susceptibilities. The three screening methods used were brain heart infusion agar with 6 mg/liter vancomycin (BHIA6V) (CDC/CLSI), Mueller-Hinton agar with 5 mg/liter teicoplanin (MHA5T) (European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System [EARSS]), and the macrodilution method Etest (MET) (EARSS), with population analysis profile-area under the curve analysis as the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were highest for MHA5T and MET, which identified 82.5% and 85.9% of strains, respectively. BHIA6V had poor sensitivity, particularly for hGISA (11.5% of strains were detected), and gave the largest interlaboratory variation in performance. MET exhibited the least interlaboratory variation. It is essential that laboratories use appropriate methods to detect GISA/hGISA strains so that the prevalence and clinical importance of these strains can be assessed properly.

Staphylococcus aureus strains from the U.S. SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2002-2003, glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) strains, and heterogeneous GISA (hGISA) strains were used to compare bactericidal activities of daptomycin and vancomycin using MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations. Glycopeptide-susceptible S. aureus and hGISA strains were further studied by using time-kill curves. For all isolates, the daptomycin MIC50 and MIC90 are four times lower and the log drops in viable counts at 6 h and 24 h are significantly greater than those for vancomycin.

Objectives: The antibacterial effect of dalbavancin was studied against Staphylococcus aureus using stepwise declining concentrations designed to model a range of free drug concentrations observed in human serum., Methods: Initial concentrations ranged from 0.6 to 21 mg/L and experiments were conducted over 240 h. Three vancomycin-susceptible and one vancomycin-intermediate strain of S. aureus were used., Results and Conclusions: Dalbavancin showed non-concentration-dependent killing against the three vancomycin-susceptible strains in the range 3-21 mg/L and the vancomycin-intermediate strain at 15 and 21 mg/L. AUC/MIC could be related to antibacterial effect. The AUC/MIC for a bacteriostatic effect was 36 at 24 h, 55 at 120 h and 100 at 240 h. A larger AUC/MIC was required to produce a 2 log reduction in counts, being 214 at 24 h, 195 at 120 h and 331 at 240 h.

Objectives: To assess a link between resistance to Triton X-100 induced autolysis (TIA) and lowered atl expression in a collection of clinical glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (GISA) and heterogeneous GISA (hGISA)., Methods: Nine clinical GISA, 11 hGISA and 11 glycopeptide-susceptible S. aureus (GSSA), including three pairs of related isolates, were analysed using TIA assays. Lysostaphin MICs were determined by a broth microdilution technique and reverse transcriptase PCR was used to compare atl expression levels in all isolates., Results: Eight of nine clinical GISA and six of 11 hGISA exhibited lower susceptibility to TIA and higher MICs of lysostaphin than GSSA. Eight of nine GISA and all hGISA strains had lowered atl expression levels compared with GSSA., Conclusions: The majority of GISA and hGISA isolates exhibited lowered susceptibility to TIA and lysostaphin and reduced atl expression when compared with GSSA isolates. These factors could contribute to, or predispose to the development of, a thickened cell wall and glycopeptide-intermediate resistance.

The susceptibilities of clinical vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), heterogeneous VISA, and laboratory-generated linezolid-resistant S. aureus strains to the new oxazolidinone AZD2563 were assessed by agar dilution MIC determination. All clinical strains were susceptible to linezolid, and the linezolid MICs for them were equal to or twofold higher than those of AZD2563. Cross-resistance with linezolid was seen in laboratory-generated mutants, and for these strains the MIC of AZD2563 was twofold higher than that of linezolid.

Objective: To estimate the effect of treatment duration on in-hospital mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus blood stream infection and demonstrate the biases that can arise when immortal-time bias is ignored.Exposure: We compared three treatment strategies: short therapy (<10 days), intermediate (10-18 days) and long (>18 days).Main Outcome Measures: Twenty-eight-day all-cause in-hospital mortality.Methods: Using data from the BSI-FOO study, we implemented an approach proposed by Hernán to overcome confounding and immortal-time biases. The first stage is to clone all participants, so that each participant is assigned to each treatment strategy. Second, observations are censored when their data becomes inconsistent with their assigned strategy. Finally, inverse-probability weights are applied to adjust for potential selection. We compared our results to a naïve approach where immortal-time bias is ignored.Results: Of the 1903 participants in BSI-FOO, 587 were eligible and included in the analysis. After cloning, the weighted estimates of hazard ratio of mortality for short versus long therapy was 1.74 (95% CI 1.36, 2.24) and for intermediate versus long therapy was 1.09 (0.98, 1.22). In the naïve approach, the hazard ratios with reference to the long therapy group are 37.4 (95% CI 18.9 to 74.4) in the short therapy group and 4.1 (95% CI 1.9 to 8.9) in the intermediate therapy group.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that duration of therapy >18 days is beneficial with respect to 28-day in-hospital mortality, however, there remains uncertainty around the efficacy of reducing duration of treatment to 10-18 days. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ceftaroline is a new parenteral cephalosporin approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) including those due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Ceftaroline has broad-spectrum activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and exerts its bactericidal effects by binding to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), resulting in inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis. It binds to PBP 2a of MRSA with high affinity and also binds to all six PBPs in Streptococcus pneumoniae. In in vitro studies, ceftaroline demonstrated potent activity against Staphylococcus aureus (including MRSA and vancomycin-intermediate isolates), Streptococcus pneumoniae (including multidrug resistant isolates), Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and many common gram-negative pathogens, excluding extended spectrum betalactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In Phase II and Phase III clinical trials, ceftaroline was noninferior to its comparator agents and demonstrated high clinical cure rates in the treatment of cSSTIs and CAP. It demonstrated favorable outcomes in patients treated for both regulatory-approved indications and unlicensed indications in a retrospective analysis. Ceftaroline is a safe and effective option for treatment in specific patient populations in which its efficacy and safety have been proven. This article reviews the challenges in the treatment of cSSTI and CAP, ceftaroline and its microbiology, pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data which support its use in treatment of cSSTIs and CAP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin have been reported but appear to be extremely rare. However, isolates displaying hetero-resistance to vancomycin (hVRSA) are reportedly common in parts of Japan (9.3% of MRSA isolated from a group of university hospitals). We have investigated the reliability of the proposed method for detection of hetero-resistant isolates and the ability of clinical S. aureus isolates to express vancomycin resistance. The original method for identification of hVRSA was found to have poor reproducibility and may select for, rather than detect, vancomycin resistance. There appears to be a spectrum of heterogeneity in the expression of resistance to vancomycin among S. aureus. Until there is a clearer understanding of the mechanism and control of vancomycin resistance in S. aureus, and reliable tests are devised, the clinical relevance of different degrees of hetero-resistance cannot be assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The last decade has seen a significant improvement in published evidence to show the clinical predictive value of phenotypic susceptibility testing with categorization of pathogens as ‘susceptible’ or ‘resistant’ based on clinical breakpoints. Most of the published data are based on retrospective or prospective observational clinical studies of patients treated with appropriate [pathogen(s)-susceptible] or inappropriate [pathogen(s)-resistant] chemotherapy. Appropriate therapy has been shown to improve outcomes in infections occurring in hospitals, such as bloodstream infection (BSI) and pneumonia in the intensive care unit. Infections due to specific pathogens such as extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus also respond better to appropriate than inappropriate antibiotics. The situation with vancomycin-resistant enterococci is less clear, perhaps due to the increased importance of patient confounders. Streptococcus pneumoniae when causing acute pneumonia with or without BSI is a well-known exception to the predictive value of laboratory-defined resistance. Antibiotic resistance also impacts on outcomes in the community where the evidence is best for urinary tract infection. The clinical studies are compatible with the current pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic paradigm used to explain and predict antibacterial effects and therefore have a sound basis in antimicrobial science. These data underline the importance of well-constructed epidemiological studies to determine the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in clinical practice and the central place of laboratory-based susceptibility testing in dictating antimicrobial therapy and so optimizing patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]