Search

Background: Graft disruption is an unusual complication of the endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR)., Case Presentation: A 71-year-old man underwent standard EVAR with Zenith Alpha Abdominal endograft. Follow-up examinations revealed an initial significant sac shrinkage. At 24 months, duplex ultrasound (DUS) scan and computed tomography showed increase of the sac diameter associated with complete disconnection of the suprarenal stent-graft from the main body without evidence of endoleak. A standard relining with a thoracic endograft was performed between the suprarenal stent and the main body of the previous graft. At 6 months DUS revealed sac shrinkage., Conclusions: This report demonstrates an uncommon cause of endograft failure with suprarenal stent disconnection from main body and highlights the need for continuous follow-up in patients undergoing EVAR., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: Aneurysm sac regression after standard endovascular aortic repair is associated with improved outcomes, but similar data are limited after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). We sought to evaluate sac regression after FEVAR, and identify any predictors of this favorable outcome., Methods: Patients undergoing elective FEVAR using the commercially available Zenith Fenestrated device (ZFEN; Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) from 2012 to 2018 at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. The maximal aortic diameter was compared between the preoperative scan and those obtained in follow-up. Patients with of 5 mm or more sac regression were included in the regression (REG) group, with all others in the nonregression (NONREG) group. Outcomes were compared between groups using univariate analysis, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify any predictive factors for sac regression., Results: We included 132 patients undergoing FEVAR in the analysis. At a mean follow-up of 33.1 months, 65 patients (49.2%) had sac regression of 5 mm or more and comprised the REG group (n = 65 [49.2%]). The REG group had smaller diameter devices, and were less likely to have had concomitant chimney grafts placed (P < .05). The NONREG group had a higher incidence of type II endoleak (35.8% vs 12.3%; P = .002). Sac regression was associated with a significant mortality benefit on Kaplan-Meier analysis (log rank P = .02). Multivariate analysis identified adjunctive parallel grafting (odds ratio [OR], 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.36; P < .01), persistent type II endoleak (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.74; P < .01), and a greater number of target vessels (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.62; P = .002) as independent predictors of failure to regress., Conclusions: Sac regression after FEVAR occurred in nearly one-half of patients, but seems to be less common in patients with persistent type II endoleaks and those undergoing concomitant parallel grafting. Sac regression was associated with a significant survival advantage, and can be used as a clinical marker for success after FEVAR., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A patient with prior ascending aortic replacement for a type A acute dissection and a bovine arch presented with an asymptomatic chronic dissecting innominate artery aneurysm extending to both carotid arteries. As the patient refused redo open surgery, we performed a hybrid procedure with reverse extra-anatomic aortic arch debranching and a fenestrated endograft. The aneurysm was still partially perfused due to an endoleak and corrected 1 week later with vascular plugs., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the influence of hemodynamic force on the development of type III endoleak and branch thrombosis after complex endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair., Methods: Patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, within surgical range, treated with a fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair from 2014 to 2018 and with 3-month control computed tomography angiography were selected. Demographic variables, aneurysm anatomy, and endograft conformation were analyzed retrospectively from a prospective registry. The hemodynamic force was calculated using the mass and momentum conservation equations., Results: Twenty-eight patients were included; the mean follow-up period was 24.7 ± 19.3 months. There were 102 abdominal vessels successfully catheterized (19 celiac arteries, 29 superior mesenteric arteries, 27 right renal arteries, 26 left renal arteries, and 1 polar renal artery). The rate of type III endoleak was 11.5% (n = 12); six cases were associated with branches that received two stents (P < .001). A higher rate of endoleak was observed with wider stents (8.50 ± 1.0 mm vs 7.17 ± 1.3 mm; P = .001) but not with longer stents (P = .530). All cases of type III endoleak affected visceral arteries (eight celiac arteries and four superior mesenteric arteries). The freedom from type III endoleak at 24 months was 86%. The rate of thrombosis was 5.9% (n = 6). A higher rate of thrombosis was observed in smaller vessels (5.00 ± 1.3 mm vs 7.16 ± 1.8 mm; P = .001), with higher stent oversizing (36.87% ± 23.6% vs 5.52% ± 15.0%; P < .001), and with a higher angle of curvature (124.33 ± 86.1 degrees vs 57.71 ± 27.9 degrees; P < .001). All cases of thrombosis were related to renal arteries (two left renal arteries, two right renal arteries, and two polar renal arteries). The freedom from thrombosis at 24 months was 92%. The area under the curve for the angle of curvature was 0.802 (95% confidence interval, 0.661-0.943; P = .013), and the cutoff point was established at 59.5 degrees (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 60.4%). The receiver operating characteristic curve for the stent oversize showed an area under the curve of 0.903 (95% confidence interval, 0.821-0.984; P = .001), and the cutoff point was 14.5% (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 77.1%). A higher hemodynamic force was associated with thrombosis (23.35 × 10 -3  N ± 18.7 × 10 -3  N vs 12.31 × 10 -3  N ± 6.8 × 10 -3  N; P = .001) but not with endoleak (P = .796). The freedom from endoleak and thrombosis at 24 months was 86% and 90%, respectively., Conclusions: Longer stents should be preferred to avoid type III endoleak. A higher angle of curvature leads to a higher hemodynamic force that results in a higher rate of thrombosis. Accordingly, we recommend maintaining the angle of curvature under 59.9 degrees. Small vessels and excessive stent oversizing entail a higher risk of thrombosis; as such, we advise a maximum stent oversize of 14.5%. Renal arteries are more susceptible to thrombosis, whereas visceral arteries are more prone to endoleak., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Aortic geometry has been shown to influence the development of endograft malapposition (bird-beaking) in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), but the extent of this relationship lacks clarity. The aim of this study was to develop a reproducible method of measuring bird-beak severity and to investigate preoperative geometry associated with bird-beaking., Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed 20 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms or type B dissections treated with TEVAR. Computed tomography scans were used to construct three-dimensional geometric models of the preoperative and postoperative aorta and endograft. Postoperative bird-beaking was quantified with length, height, and angle; categorized into a bird-beak group (BBG; n = 10) and no bird-beak group (NBBG; n = 10) using bird-beak height ≥5 mm as a threshold; and correlated to preoperative metrics including aortic cross-sectional area, inner curvature, diameter, and inner curvature × diameter as well as graft diameter and oversizing at the proximal landing zone., Results: Aortic area (1002 ± 118 mm 2 vs 834 ± 248 mm 2 ), inner curvature (0.040 ± 0.014 mm -1 vs 0.031 ± 0.012 mm -1 ), and diameter (35.7 ± 2.1 mm vs 32.2 ± 4.9 mm) were not significantly different between BBG and NBBG; however, inner curvature × diameter was significantly higher in BBG (1.4 ± 0.5 vs 1.0 ± 0.3; P = .030). Inner curvature and curvature × diameter were significantly correlated with bird-beak height (R = 0.462, P = .041; R = 0.592, P = .006) and bird-beak angle (R = 0.680, P < .001; R = 0.712, P < .001)., Conclusions: TEVAR bird-beak severity can be quantified and predicted with geometric modeling techniques, and the combination of high preoperative aortic inner curvature and diameter increases the risk for development of TEVAR bird-beaking., (Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chimney endovascular aneurysm sealing (ch-EVAS) could potentially minimize gutter-associated endoleaks in patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms resulting from the use of the conformable endobags surrounding the chimney stent grafts (ch-SGs). The aim of the present study was to quantify the (non)apposition of the endobags in the proximal aortic neck, migration of the endograft stent frames, and changes in geometry of the ch-SGs during the follow-up period., Methods: The prospective data from 20 patients undergoing elective ch-EVAS were retrospectively reviewed. The aortic anatomy was analyzed on preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans. The (non)apposition of the endobags in the aortic neck, Nellix (Endologix, Irvine, Calif) stent frame migration, and chimney graft geometry and migration were assessed., Results: The median preoperative infrarenal neck length was 4.0 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 0-6.0 mm). The median seal length in the juxtarenal aortic neck at the first follow-up was 23.0 mm (IQR 18.0-30.8 mm). Five type IA endoleaks were identified on postoperative imaging; one at 1 month and four newly diagnosed at 1 year. Of these five type IA endoleaks, two were type Is1 (not extending into the aneurysm sac) and did not need reintervention and other three were type Is2 (extending into the aneurysm sac). One of these patients died of malignancy before reintervention could be performed. Bilateral ch-SG occlusions in one patient were documented at the 1-month follow-up (patient needed hemodialysis) and two patients with a new single ch-SG occlusion were found at the 1-year follow-up. No reinterventions were performed for the ch-SG occlusions. An occluded Nellix stent frame in one patient was treated with femorofemoral crossover bypass. Kaplan-Meier estimate of reintervention-free survival was 85.0% after 1 year. Migration ≥5 mm of the proximal end of the Nellix stent frames was observed in 20.0% of the patients, but no reintervention was performed at the 1-year follow-up. Imaging showed 20.1% of the available sealing surface was not used, and the nonapposition surface increased to 30.6% of the preoperative aortic neck surface at 1 year. Median migration was 3.5 mm (IQR, 2.4-5.0 mm) and 3.1 mm (IQR, 2.0-4.8 mm) for the left and right proximal end of the Nellix stent frames, respectively, and was 3.0 mm (IQR, 2.2-4.8 mm) for the proximal end of the ch-SGs at 1 year of follow-up., Conclusions: Substantial distal migration of the Nellix endograft and positional changes of the ch-SGs in the juxtarenal aortic neck were observed at 1 year of follow-up, resulting in a 25.0% type IA endoleak rate, with three of these type IA endoleaks extending into the aneurysm sac. The reintervention-free survival rate was 85.0% at 1 year in this cohort of 20 patients. Careful follow-up after ch-EVAS is advised because changes are often subtle. The authors have stopped the ch-EVAS procedure so far. Long-term follow-up data on the stability of the Nellix endograft and the consequences of migration on ch-SGs is required before this technique should be used in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We report a case of late type IIIb endoleak with Willis covered stent (WCS) developed 14 months after endovascular paraclinoid aneurysm repair., Methods: A 52-year-old woman presented with episodic headache, caused by a giant paraclinoid aneurysm. She underwent a successful 3.5 x 16mm WCS positioning to treat the aneurysm. Fourteen months later, the patient was admitted with the same symptoms. Digital subtraction angiography examination showed recurrence of the aneurysm, which was similar to the preoperative one. DynaCT (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) indicated the intact of the metal structure of the stent without migration. Type IIIb endoleak (defect in the graft fabric) was confirmed with a whole aneurysm neck located in the middle part of the stent. The type IIIb endoleak was treated with another WCS (4.0 x 16mm). The immediate digital subtraction angiography imaging indicated that the endoleak disappeared and the aneurysm was completely occluded. Re-examination done 1 year after the second treatment showed a complete exclusion of the aneurysm sac., Conclusions: Type IIIb endoleaks can be safely treated by the endovascular positioning of another WCS. Continuous surveillance after endovascular paraclinoid aneurysm repair for intracranial aneurysms is warranted to make ensure the safety of WCS., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To describe a case of extrinsic compression of the Ovation stent-graft following glue embolization for type II endoleak., Case Report: A 75-year-old man with a past history of ischemic heart disease and endovascular aneurysm repair with an Ovation stent-graft was admitted for treatment of type II endoleaks from the right L2 and left L4 lumbar arteries with egress via the inferior mesenteric and right L4 lumbar arteries, respectively. Successful embolization was performed via a translumbar sac puncture with a combination of coils and histoacryl glue. On final angiography severe lumen narrowing of the unsupported portion of the Ovation stent-graft was seen owing to extrinsic compression by the glue. This was successfully salvaged with percutaneous transarterial kissing balloon angioplasty., Conclusion: Aortic lumen narrowing caused by extrinsic compression of an Ovation stent-graft following glue embolization of type II endoleak is an unusual and potentially problematic complication.

Objectives: Type 1a endoleak is one of the most severe complications after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), because it carries the risk of aortic rupture. The association between bird-beak configuration and Type 1a endoleak remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyse the predictors of Type 1a endoleak following Zone 1 and Zone 2 TEVAR, with a particular focus on the effect of bird-beak configuration., Methods: From April 2008 to July 2015, 105 patients (mean age 68.6 years) who underwent Zone 1 and 2 landing TEVAR were enrolled, with a mean follow-up period of 4.3 years. The patients were categorized into 2 groups, according to the presence (Group B, n = 32) or the absence (Group N, n = 73) of bird-beak configuration on the first postoperative multidetector computed tomography., Results: The Kaplan-Meier event-free rate curve showed that Type 1a endoleak and bird-beak progression occurred less frequently in Group N than in Group B. Five-year freedom from Type 1a endoleak rates were 79.7% and 100% for Groups B and N, respectively (P = 0.007). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that dissecting aortic aneurysm (odds ratio 3.72, 95% confidence interval 1.30-11.0; P = 0.014) and shorter radius of inner curvature (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 0.85-0.99; P = 0.025) were significant risk factors for bird-beak configuration. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression showed that Z-type stent graft (hazard ratio 2.69, 95% confidence interval 1.11-6.51; P = 0.030) was a significant risk factor for bird-beak progression., Conclusions: Appropriate stent grafts need to be chosen carefully to prevent Type 1a endoleak and bird-beak configuration after landing Zone 1 and 2 TEVAR. Patients with bird-beak configuration on early postoperative multidetector computed tomography require closer follow-up to screen for Type 1a endoleak., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

The article deals with a case report regarding successful surgical management of late type IB endoleak caused by dislocation of the leg of the stent graft, occurring three years after endoprosthetic repair of an aneurysm of the aortic infrarenal portion with the COOK stent graft, aneurysmectomy with prosthetic repair of the right common femoral artery using the linear vascular graft Intergard 8Ч20. The patient underwent surgical treatment: endoprosthetic repair of the iliac branch ZSLE-24-90-90 ZT of the Zenith Spiral AAA stent graft. The findings of the check-up angiography and ultrasonographic examination revealed no evidence of endoleak, with the stent graft's patency preserved. The early postoperative period was marked with moderate manifestations of asthenic syndrome. The patient was discharged in a satisfactory condition. Cases concerning removal of similar complication in the remote period following endoprosthetic repair of the aorta are mentioned sporadically in the available literature.

As more challenging aortic arch anatomy is being treated using aortic stent-grafts, there is an increased risk for proximal Type I endoleaks at the proximal seal zone or subsequent graft migration. We report a case of an endoanchor-assisted thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair of a patient with an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and aortic arch aneurysm who developed a proximal Type I endoleak in the aortic arch which was subsequently treated with endoanchors., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Early morbidity and mortality are generally lower after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), than after open repair but re-interventions and late complications are more common. The aim of the present study was to make a detailed description of re-interventions after EVAR-including incidence, indications, procedures, and outcome-with special reference to non-access-related re-interventions., Methods: This is a retrospective single-center cohort study of re-interventions after standard EVAR with special reference to non-access-related re-interventions. Consecutive patients (n = 405) treated with standard EVAR for non-ruptured (n = 337) or ruptured (n = 68) infrarenal aneurysms between 2005 and 2013 were analysed. Median follow-up was 29 months (range 0-108)., Results: Eighty-nine patients (22 %) underwent 113 re-interventions during follow-up. Twenty-seven patients (7 %) had 28 access related re-intervention, 65 patients (16 %) had 85 non-access related reinterventions. Non-access related re-interventions were more common in ruptured aneurysms than in unruptured aneurysms (22 vs. 15 %, p = 0.002). The most frequent indications were endoleak type I (n = 19), type II (n = 21), or type III (n = 5); stent graft migration (n = 9); and thrombosis (n = 14). The most frequent procedures were embolization of endoleak type II (n = 21), additional iliac stent graft (n = 19), proximal extension (n = 12), thrombolysis (n = 8), iliac limb bare-metal stenting (n = 6), and stent graft relining (n = 7). Endovascular technique was used in 83 % of re-interventions. Thirty-day mortality after non-access-related re-interventions was 15 % when initiated from symptoms (rupture or infection) and 0 % when initiated from follow-up findings (p = 0.014). Cumulative survival five years after EVAR was 72 % in patients with a re-intervention and 59 % in patients without (p = 0.21)., Conclusions: Non-access-related re-intervention rates are still considerable after EVAR and more frequent after ruptured aneurysms. Endoleak embolization is the most frequent procedure, followed by additional iliac stent grafts. Outcomes after re-interventions are generally good, except when initiated by rupture or infection.

Purpose: To report 2 cases of type IIIb endoleak with the Endurant stent-graft and postulate the cause for the events., Case Report: A type IIIb endoleak was diagnosed at open conversion for a ruptured aneurysm 4 years after implantation of an Endurant stent-graft. In the other case, the endoleak was diagnosed at angiography 4 years after the Endurant stent-graft was implanted; the stent-graft was relined. In both cases the fabric hole was in the body of the stent-graft at the level of the top of the contralateral limb., Conclusion: The cause of the type IIIb endoleaks in these cases was fabric erosion likely due to interaction between the bare metal at the top of the contralateral limb and the fabric of the stent-graft body., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Purpose: To report the use of the off-the-shelf Zenith t-Branch Thoracoabdominal Endovascular Graft for the treatment of a symptomatic acute type Ia endoleak subsequent to previous infrarenal bifurcated endovascular aneurysm repair., Case Report: A 72-year-old man presented 4 years after implantation of an Anaconda stent-graft with sac expansion and type II endoleak, which was treated over the next 18 months with repeated coil and glue embolization of the leak and sac. Six months after the last attempt, imaging disclosed a new type Ia endoleak. Sac enlargement became symptomatic, and emergent treatment was performed using the off-the-shelf Zenith b-Branch device. The 4 visceral arteries were bridged with Fluency stent-grafts. The Anaconda stent-graft precluded the use of a standard Zenith universal distal body bifurcated device below the t-Branch graft, so a reversed tapered 16×20×82-mm iliac limb was placed to bridge the t-Branch to the larger Anaconda limb; the smaller 12-mm contralateral Anaconda limb was occluded. The procedure was concluded with a femorofemoral bypass. At 10 months after the procedure, the patient is well; the sac diameter has decreased, and there is no endoleak on imaging., Conclusion: The multibranched Zenith t-branch device may be useful in treating proximal endoleaks in bifurcated stent-grafts., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) using the Nellix system is a new and different method of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Normal postoperative imaging has unique appearances that change with time; complications also have different and specific appearances. This consensus document on the imaging findings after Nellix EVAS is based on the collective experience of the sites involved in the Nellix EVAS Global Forward Registry and the US Investigational Device Exemption Trial. The normal findings on computed tomography (CT), duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiography are described. With time, endobag appearances change on CT due to contrast migration to the margins of the hydrogel polymer within the endobag. Air within the endobag also has unique appearances that change over time. Among the complications after Nellix EVAS, type I endoleak usually presents as a curvilinear area of flow between the endobag and aortic wall, while type II endoleak is typically small and usually occurs where an aortic branch artery lies adjacent to an irregular aortic blood lumen that is not completely filled by the endobag. Procedural aortic injury is an uncommon but important complication that occurs as a result of overfilling of the endobags during Nellix EVAS. The optimum imaging surveillance algorithm after Nellix EVAS has yet to be defined but is largely CT-based, especially in the first year postprocedure. However, duplex ultrasound also appears to be a sensitive modality in identifying normal appearances and complications., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Purpose: To describe the successful endovascular treatment of 2 patients with type IIIb endoleak using the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System., Case Report: Two men aged 75 and 83 years presented with type IIIb endoleak several years (8 and 3, respectively) after initial endovascular aneurysm repair. Dual Nellix endoprosthesis were deployed in the stent-grafts, and the endobags were filled with polymer to seal the defect and eliminate the endoleak. The perioperative periods were uneventful. At up to 6-month follow-up, no endoleaks were detected, aneurysm diameters were unchanged, and the endografts were patent. One patient died 7 months after revision due to a metastatic malignancy., Conclusion: The Nellix EVAS System may prove useful for the treatment of type IIIb endoleak., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Objective/background: Persistent type II endoleak (EL II) with sac enlargement after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm requires treatment to prevent rupture. Embolization is not always effective. Conversion to open repair with stent graft (SG) explantation is a high risk option. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and immediate results of an alternative technique combining obliterative endoaneurysmorrhaphy (OEA) with SG preservation., Methods: The open surgical technique combined sacotomy, ligation of all patent back-bleeding vessels and SG preservation. The aneurysmal shell was tightly closed over the SG to protect it from the intestines. An intra-aortic occlusion balloon was used when clamping was required., Results: Twelve patients were treated with the OEA technique at Amiens University Hospital. All 12 procedures were successful. Four patients had previously undergone unsuccessful transarterial or translumbar embolization. Aortic clamping was performed in four cases. No SG migration or graft dislocation was observed. Follow up computed tomography scan at a median of 12 months showed shrinkage of the aneurysm sac with stable diameters and no recurrence of EL II in all cases., Conclusion: The OEA technique is an alternative option for the treatment of progressive EL II, which can be particularly useful after failure of embolization., (Copyright © 2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Treatment of type IB endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for post-dissection aortic aneurysm usually includes attempts of endovascular interventions using coils or plugs to occlude the false lumen or placement of a distal fenestrated endograft. Open conversion usually requires deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest with the associated increased mortality and complications. We present a case of a young patient with a 90 mm descending thoracic aneurysm caused by a chronic type B aortic dissection. A type II endoleak after TEVAR was successfully treated with left subclavian artery transposition. The patient had a rapidly increasing aortic aneurysm with a persistent type IB endoleak in spite of placement of an Amplatzer plug into the false lumen of the dissection. He developed progressive acute compression of the main stem bronchi by the aneurysm sac and his dyspnea worsened by an acute pulmonary embolism treated with anticoagulation. Adequate oxygenation could only be achieved with mechanical ventilation using a double-lumen endobronchial tube. A left thoracotomy was performed and the type IB endoleak was treated with bending of the distal aorta around the stent graft with a Dacron graft sleeve. Aortic clamping and circulatory support devices were avoided. The sac of the aneurysm was opened, a giant hematoma was evacuated, and aneurysmorrhaphy was performed to cover the stent graft. There was no residual endoleak and the bronchi were decompressed. The patient recovered after prolonged hospitalization and he was discharged home in good condition 24 days after admission. He returned to his normal activities and is asymptomatic 5 months later. Computed tomographic angiography showed decreased aneurysm sac, no evidence of endoleak, no residual pulmonary embolus, and no bronchial compression., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A delayed secondary open conversion (SOC) after endovascular aneurysm repair may be necessary due to a failing graft. Many surgical techniques can be performed, and one such approach is partial explantation of the graft with resuturing of a new graft to the retained components of the endograft. No guidelines exist with regards to the follow-up of retained endovascular components after a delayed SOC. The theoretical risk of endoleaks remains with retained components, and this case demonstrates the development of a type Ib endoleak after SOC leading to free flow of blood into a partially resected aneurysm sac and causing a symptomatic aneurysm rupture., (Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To report the causes of second rupture in patients treated with a stent graft for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA)., Case Report: A 69-year-old man was admitted for abdominal pain and hypovolemic shock 22 months after endovascular exclusion of an rAAA with an aortomonoiliac stent graft and a crossover bypass despite normal duplex ultrasound and sac shrinkage at 1 year. During emergent laparotomy, a type IA endoleak was discovered and the aortomonoiliac stent graft was explanted. A Dacron bypass was interposed between the infrarenal aorta and the iliac extension stent graft., Conclusions: Considering the literature, this report has 3 implications for the endovascular treatment of rAAA. First, 30% oversizing is preferable to 15% when treating an rAAA assessed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) performed during permissive hypotension. Second, the surveillance program should rely on CTA and not on a duplex examination to detect any endoleaks or migration. Finally, partial stent graft explantation is a valid option for decreasing aortic clamping time., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The frozen elephant procedure, as a hybrid method to treat aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch and the proximal descending aorta, has become an accepted treatment option. We report two late fractures of the nitinol stents of the endograft of an early frozen elephant trunk prosthesis. One patient suffered from a tear of the woven polyester fabric, causing a Type III endoleak and rapid progression of the existing descending aortic aneurysm. The patient received replacement of the descending aorta. The second patient showed a fracture of a nitinol stent without further complications during follow-up., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: The advent of branched and fenestrated aortic endografts has facilitated the treatment of increasingly complex aortic pathology. The management of complications and endoleaks involving the branches and fenestrations of these grafts represents an increasingly significant clinical and technical challenge., Methods: A 79-year-old woman developed a rare type IIIb endoleak from a tear in the graft fabric immediately posterior to the celiac axis branch 3 years after the placement of an off-the-shelf branched endograft for a type II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The patient presented urgently with abdominal pain and a maximal aneurysm diameter of 15.3 cm., Results: The operative plan was to create a chimney graft completely within the original branched endograft to cover the defect and maintain celiac branch flow. The celiac trunk was accessed from a left axillary approach and access for the main endograft body was achieved via the left femoral artery. Two balloon-expandable covered stents were deployed from the celiac branch extending into the main endograft as a chimney and molded to 2 aortic extension cuffs to cover the fabric defect. The resultant configuration was a modified-sandwich graft within the original stent graft and resulted in successful exclusion of the endoleak. Postoperative imaging at 1, 6, and 12 months has demonstrated continued patency of the celiac trunk, no further endoleak, and a 16-mm reduction in aneurysm size., Conclusions: The chimney technique was successfully applied as an endovascular option to salvage a multibranched endograft with a significant and anatomically unfavorable defect. Careful follow-up and additional clinical study are required to clarify the role of off-the-shelf solutions in complex endoleak management., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim was to compare multidirectional stent graft movement in patients with and without a type 2 endoleak., Methods: This was a retrospective case control study of patients being followed up after elective endovascular aneurysm repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The post-procedural and final follow up multislice computed tomography (MSCT) of 69 patients with and 74 without a type 2 endoleak were analyzed. Three dimensional (3D) surface models of the stent graft, delimited by landmarks using custom built software, were derived from these MSCT data. The stent graft was segmented in different zones, and the proportion of the total stent graft surface moving >9 mm between the post-procedural and the final follow up MSCT was calculated, given in percentages, and compared between groups. Changes of infrarenal neck, renal artery to stent graft distance, and freedom from stent graft related endoleaks were evaluated., Results: Overall surface movement was higher in the no endoleak (18.8%, IQR 0.1-45.1%) than in the type 2 endoleak group (5.3%, IQR 0-29.7%; p = .06). Furthermore, significantly higher surface movement in the no endoleak group was found in the proximal anchoring zone (p = .04) and the distal left limb (p = .01), which was the modular limb in 81.1% (p < .01). Neck diameter increase (1.0 mm, IQR 0-3.0 mm; p < .01) and renal artery to stent graft distance difference (0 mm, IQR 0-3.3 mm; p < .01) were significantly higher in the no endoleak group. Five patients in the no endoleak and one patient in the type 2 endoleak group suffered from a stent graft related endoleak (p = .27)., Conclusions: The presence of a type 2 endoleak is associated with decreased surface movement of the proximal anchoring zone and the distal modular limb of bifurcated stent grafts., (Copyright © 2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Effective proximal sealing, especially in the long-term, remains a limitation of contemporary endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Endostaples that fixate the proximal stent-graft to the aortic neck wall, aiming for better apposition and proximal sealing have been recently introduced in clinical practice to address this problem. Initial experimental studies have shown that endostaples can increase proximal stent-graft fixation to levels equivalent or superior to that of a hand-sewn anastomosis. Further clinical studies aimed to investigate whether this increased proximal fixation results in reduced migration and better sealing with lower rates of type I endoleak. The present chapter discusses the efficacy of endostaples in reducing migration and type I endoleak after EVAR, based on published clinical data.

Purpose: To report the application of the Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) device, including two chimney grafts, to successfully treat a type Ia endoleak., Case Report: An 87-year-old man had an asymptomatic 7.6-cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and a 4.5-cm right internal iliac artery aneurysm treated using an aortouni-iliac stent-graft. Two years after the index endovascular repair, an asymptomatic type Ia endoleak was detected on duplex ultrasound; the computed tomographic angiogram (CTA) demonstrated significant sac enlargement and stent-graft migration. Initial attempts to treat the leak with 2 aortic cuffs only reduced the size of the endoleak. Another procedure was undertaken using the Nellix device with chimney grafts to increase the proximal sealing zone above the existing stent-graft. Imaging postoperatively demonstrated successful resolution of the endoleak and continuing patency of both renal artery chimney stent-grafts. CTA at 6 months demonstrated persistent sealing of the endoleak., Conclusion: The use of the EVAS system may represent another endovascular solution that can be added to the clinician's repertoire for treating type Ia endoleak after conventional endovascular repair of infrarenal AAA., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Objectives: Fenestrated and branched endografts allow for proximal sealing zone extension into or above the visceral aorta to optimize landing in healthy aorta. We describe the incidence, causes, and implications of proximal endoleak development in patients undergoing complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair., Methods: All patients undergoing a fenestrated/branched repair were entered onto a prospective database, and this analysis included all those with at least one postoperative contrast computed tomography scan. Preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional imaging was reanalyzed to characterize morphology and identify endoleak. A blinded assessor used the preoperative imaging to resize the repairs in the endoleak group and a matched cohort of patients without endoleak. The outcome measures were proximal endoleak development, mortality, and component stability, and a comparison was made with all patients undergoing complex aortic repair., Results: From 2001 to July 2013, 969 patients underwent repair in a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption trial. Excluded were 24 emergency patients and 21 patients without requisite imaging, leaving 924 available for analysis. A proximal type Ia endoleak developed in 26 patients (2.8%). Poor choice of landing zone was implicated in most cases, with an area of sealing in the visceral aorta, compared with the thoracic aorta, being significantly associated with endoleak development (P < .01). Aortic-related mortality was significantly higher in the endoleak group (26.9%) than in the group without endoleak (6.2%; P = .001). These patients also experienced a higher incidence of component instability of 30.8% compared with 9.6% in patients without type Ia endoleak (P < .01)., Conclusions: Fenestrated/branched endovascular repair has a low incidence of sealing zone failure despite the increased complexity. However, development of a proximal endoleak destabilizes the repair and leads to increased mortality. Increasing complexity of design seems to improve the long-term outcome for patients requiring complex aortic repair., (Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aneurysmal evolution of an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) is an operative indication. Endovascular treatment is a minimally invasive procedure, which offers good short-term and midterm results. We describe a case of a 9-cm diameter ARSA aneurysm in a symptomatic man, treated with the triple-barrel technique using a thoracic aortic stent graft combined with surgical and endovascular revascularization of the supra-aortic trunks. Postoperatively, the patient developed a type III endoleak which was covered. The triple-barrel technique has been a proposed treatment approach for complex aortic arch pathologies and remains a less invasive option when compared with open surgery., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study is to describe our clinical experience with an extra-large self-expandable stent specifically designed to treat aortic lesions (E-XL, Jotec GmbH, Hechingen, Germany), now commercially available in Europe. The E-XL was used at our Institution in 14 patients (mean age, 56±12 years; 9 males) with the following indications: improve proximal fixation (4 cases), type I endoleak (2 cases), aortic dissection with static malperfusion (1 case) and dynamic malperfusion (7 cases). Early results have been shown to be safe and effective in different clinical settings, including in emergency cases. This peculiar aortic stent could be useful in the armamentarium of the endovascular surgeon.

Objective: To assess the incidence and risk factors for proximal aneurysm neck related complications with a late generation device for endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR)., Methods: Data were retrieved from a prospective registry (Endurant Stent Graft Natural Selection Global Postmarket Registry) involving 79 institutions worldwide. The risk factors tested were age, gender, surgical risk profile, proximal neck length (<10 mm), diameter (>30 mm), supra- and infrarenal angulation (>60° and 75°), mural thrombus/calcification (>50%) and taper (>10%), and AAA diameter (>65 mm). Two neck related composite endpoints were used, for intra-operative (type-1a endoleak, conversion, deployment/retrieval complication or unintentional renal coverage) and post-operative (type-1a endoleak or migration) adverse events. Independent risk factors were identified using multivariable backwards modeling., Results: The study included 1263 patients (mean age 73, 10.3% female) from March 2009 to May 2011. Twenty three (1.8%) intra-operative adverse events occurred. Neck length <10 mm (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.1-22.6) and neck thrombus/calcification >50% (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.7-13.5) were risk factors for intra-operative events. The planned 1 year follow up visit was reached for the entire cohort, and the 2 year visit for 431 patients. During this time, 99 (7.8%) events occurred. Female gender (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2), aneurysm diameter >65 mm (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.9-4.2), and neck length <10 mm (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-6.9) were significant post-operative risk factors. Neck angulation, neck taper, large diameter neck, and presence of thrombus/calcification were not predictors of adverse outcome in this study., Conclusion: These results support the adequacy of this device in the face of adverse neck anatomy, and confirm neck length as the most relevant anatomical limitation for EVAR. Additionally, the study confirms the decline in early to mid-term intervention rates with a newer generation device in a large patient sample. Lastly, it suggests that neck related risk factors affect outcome and impact on prognosis in varying degrees., (Copyright © 2014 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Type IV endoleaks represent a rare etiology of late endograft failure; however, depending on the location, they can be extremely challenging to repair with endovascular solutions. We present a method of endograft relining that preserves antegrade limb perfusion, avoids extra-anatomic reconstructions, and ensures complete endograft exclusion., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

We present 3 cases of stent graft infection in patients who were treated with preservation of the endograft. In the first patient, the contamination of the endograft was the consequence of a bleeding aortoenteric fistula, whereas in the second patient, the endograft was implanted into a ruptured contaminated aortic aneurysm because of the patient's hemodynamic instability. In the third patient, the presence of a consistent type Ia endoleak after a chimney graft procedure followed by secondary interventions led to an infection of the stent graft. In each case, a laparotomy was performed with debridement, followed by appropriate antibiotic therapy. The first patient suffered a fatal pulmonary embolism. The other 2 patients are alive 4 and 24 months after the diagnosis of endograft infection. In unstable patients or those with severe comorbidities who cannot tolerate endograft excision and aortic reconstruction, surgical debridement followed by appropriate antibiotic therapy can be a temporary or bridging solution., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Current commercially available modular stentgrafts are associated with relevant reintervention rates during follow-up. The Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System is a potential device to overcome these limitations of EVAR. Device implantations outside of manufacturer instructions for use due to challenging neck anatomies are very common. This article presents very early experience in the treatment of patients with post EVAR complications and challenging neck anatomies., Methods: EVAS with the Nellix System consists of bilateral PTFE-covered stentgrafts surrounded by endobags which are filled with biostable polymer which cures after 3-5 minutes. The device and concept is designed to seal the entire aneurysm lumen, to withstand lateral displacement forces and effectively seal lumbar or inferior mesenteric arteries. Potentially, device migration, type II endoleak, and subsequent reinterventions will be reduced in the longterm. Single case experience in four European vascular centers is reported using Nellix off-IFU (instructions for use), addressing technical aspects as well as patient selection criterias., Results: Recent preliminary clinical experience using Nellix outide of the IFU in challenging neck anatomies prooves early feasibility and efficacy in patients being excluded for open repair (OR) and also for EVAR and FEVAR within OR. Short-term results are promising. Migration, renal artery occlusions or type II endoleaks were not observed. One type Ia endoleak was observed but was temporary and resolved. We also found that the chimney technique is feasible with Nellix, where secondary target vessel loss nor gutters were observed. The EVAS concept is a potential tool to treat post EVAR complications such as secondary type I endoleak or type IV material fatigue. Feasibility has been proven in single cases., Conclusion: EVAS is an innovative, intriguing concept in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Short-term outcomes of the Nellix system is promising. Early experience of Nellix out of IFU when treating patients with challenging proximal infraenal necks, with post EVAR complications, short necks and chimney techniques show technical feasibility and promising short-term results. Mid- and long-term data are needed to validate device and procedure durability.

Background: With the growing prevalence of endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), the number of patients requiring graft explantation is increasing. Therefore, knowledge related to outcomes after explantation may lead to improvement in surgical options. In this study we compare our experience with explantation of aortic endografts, based on indication., Methods: The medical records of all aortic procedures performed at our center were queried during the period from 2002 to 2012. Relevant data from patients needing explantation of aortic endografts were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, t-test, and Kaplan-Meier analysis., Results: Thirty-nine patients underwent aortic endograft explantation (64.1% men). Mean age was 71.9 years with a mean aneurysm size of 6.8 cm (range 3.5-10.7 cm). Hypertension (97.4%), hyperlipidemia (76.9%), and history of smoking (82%) were the most prevalent risk factors. Mean time to explant was 41.7 months (range 2.2-118.4 months). The primary explant indication was endoleak in 27 (69.2%) and infection in 12 (30.8%) patients. The endoleak group consisted of 13 type I, 8 type II, 1 type III, 4 endotension, 1 rupture, and 4 patients with multiple endoleaks. Seven patients were symptomatic, whereas 2 had ruptured aneurysms. Half of the patients in the infection group required supraceliac clamping for explantation. Operative blood loss (P = 0.08) and need for transfusion (P = 0.005) were significantly higher in the infection group. Thirty-day morbidity was 51.8% for the endoleak group and 83% for the infection group (P = 0.08). There were only 2 deaths in the cohort within 30 days, both in the infection group. Twenty-seven patients were alive at a mean follow-up of 1.9 years (range 0.1-8.4 years)., Conclusions: Endograft explantation is a challenging operation with high morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, patients with an infectious etiology have significantly worse outcomes than those requiring explantation for endoleaks., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Nowadays, there are two possible solutions to aneurysms of the abdominal aorta. One is an open resection, which is undoubtedly one of the major surgeries and endovascular solutions, and which represents a smaller operating load for the patient. Long-term monitoring of patients after the endovascular solutions showed late failure in 7-17% of cases. The late incidence of endoleaks and the migration of stents are explained by changing the anatomy of the aneurysm and the resulting change in the mechanical pressure on the stent graft. If these conditions cannot be solved by an endovascular procedure the situation may present a technical challenge for the vascular surgeon., Material and Methods: Our report on the five case studies points to possible late complications of EVAR and solutions to their individual states., Conclusions: In the future, it should be recognized that if the endoleak is not proven it does not mean that it cannot occur over the years and massively fill the excluded aneurysm with the risk of rupture. Undoubtedly, re-operating the open patch is a challenging exercise. Nevertheless, it is possible even with the patients who were, primarily in terms of polymorbidity, indicated EVAR.

A 73-year-old man developed type I and III endoleaks from a fractured right renal stent with downward migration of a fenestrated endograft, 6 years after endovascular repair of a juxtarenal aneurysm. Endovascular treatment attempts were unsuccessful. He underwent aortic debranching and antegrade visceral artery revascularization via a left thoracolaparotomy incision and an extraperitoneal approach to the visceral aorta. An antegrade aortic stent covered the endoleak, with technical and clinical success at 9 months. Failure of complex endografts presents particular problems, potentially not amenable to totally endovascular repair. Continued surveillance is mandated as late, asymptomatic sac expansion can occur., (Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The aim of this paper was to evaluate short-term outcome of the use of endoanchors to secure the primary migrated endograft and additional extender cuffs to the aortic wall in patients with previous failed endovascular aortic aneurysm repair., Methods: Consecutive patients who needed proximal repair of a primary failed endograft due to migration (with or without type IA endoleaks) were treated with endoanchors, with or without additional extender cuffs. Data of this group were prospectively gathered in vascular referral centers that were early adopters of the endoanchor technique. Preprocedural and periprocedural data were prospectively gathered and retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up after endoanchor placement consisted of regular hospital visits, with computed tomography or duplex scanning at 1, 6, and 12 months., Results: From July 2010 to May 2011, 11 patients (8 men), mean age 77 years (range, 59-88 years), were treated with endoanchors for a failed primary endograft (2 Excluder endografts, 1 AneuRx endograft, and 8 Talent endografts) due to distal migration of the main body, with or without type IA endoleak. Revision consisted of using endoanchors to secure the body of the primary endograft to the aortic wall to avoid persistent migration. Most patients had additional proximal extender cuffs with suprarenal fixation, which were secured with endoanchors to the aortic wall and in some patients also to the primary endograft. A median of 6 endoanchors were implanted. All endoanchors were positioned correctly but one. One endoanchor dislodged but was successfully retrieved using an endovascular snare. During a mean follow-up of 10 months (range, 3-18 months) no endoanchor-related complications or renewed migration of the endografts occurred. Two patients underwent repeat intervention due to persistent type IA endoleak during follow-up., Conclusion: The use of endoanchors to secure migrated endografts to the aortic wall is safe and feasible and might help to overcome persistent migration of primary failed endografts. In combination with the use of sole extender cuffs the majority of proximal EVAR failures can be solved.

Endoleaks are one of the most common reasons for reinterventions and failure after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Current classifications divide endoleaks into type I-V but a more pragmatic definition is of direct and indirect endoleaks. Direct endoleaks (type I and III) transmit direct systemic pressure to the aneurysm sac and carry a high risk of aneurysm growth and rupture if left untreated. Immediate intervention is generally warranted. Indirect endoleaks (type II, IV, V) may have a more benign course and should be treated only under the presence of aneurysm growth. Appropriate procedural planning and device selection is critical to avoid endoleaks and most direct endoleaks can be identified and treated periprocedurally by use of high quality intraoperative imaging techniques. Late endoleaks can be treated predominately by endovascular means and the need for conversion to open surgery is rare.

Endoleak type IV occurs very rarely and typically was observed 4-8 weeks following implantation of previous generation stentgrafts. Endoleak type II, although relatively common, typically presents early after stentgraft implantation. In our case combined thrombocytopenia-induced endoleaks type II and IV manifested 22 months following stentgraft implantation. The patient presented with abdominal pain and rapid increase in aneurysm diameter. The patient did not require endovascular intervention, medical treatment proved sufficient to relieve clinical symptoms and to prevent progression of the aneurysmal sac. Thrombocytopenia has not manifested itself again so far. The patient is followed-up with increased frequency. It should be noted that occurrence of type IV endoleak, in particular when associated with other type of endoleak, can result from thrombocytopenia. This type of endoleak should be included in differential diagnosis not only in early postinterventional period but also in long-term follow-up, first of all in patients with first generation stentgrafts implanted, featured by porosity of covering material.

Endoleaks represent the most common complication of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. With the increasing use of endovascular techniques for aortic aneurysm repair, the prevalence of endoleaks has risen. While maintaining pressurization of the aneurysm sac, endoleaks expose to persistent risks of an evolution towards rupture. Long-term surveillance with imaging studies is necessary to reduce the incidence of these specific complications that may require intervention. The objective of this article is to draw the attention to the possible occurrence of these complications and to report the elements of diagnosis and treatment.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate immediate and long-term results of endoscopic type 2 endoleak repair (EER) following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The basic methods include a retrospective review of electronic and paper medical records of patients admitted or referred to our institution for EER. Between July 1999 and October 2007, eight consecutive patients underwent EER. Mean operative time was 190 (104-355) min. One patient died preoperatively, due to profuse venous bleeding . One procedure was redone due to a missed pair of lumbar arteries. Mean hospital stay was five days (2-10). During mean follow-up, 50 months (29-91), one patient required additional coil embolization for a persistent type 2 endoleak. Four patients were diagnosed with a type 1 and one with a type 3 endoleak; three of these patients required an additional procedure. In conclusion, in this small series EER proved not to be beneficial.

Objectives: To assess the accuracy of colour-Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detecting endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR)., Design: Prospective, observational study., Materials and Methods: From December 2007 to April 2009, 108 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR were evaluated with CDUS, CEUS, CTA and MRA as well as angiography, if further treatment was necessary. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and negative predictive value of ultrasound examinations were compared with CTA and MRA as the reference standards, or with angiography when available., Results: Twenty-four endoleaks (22%, type II: 22 cases, type III: two cases) were documented. Sensitivity and specificity of CDUS, CEUS, CTA, and MRA were 58% and 93%, 96% and 100%, 83% and 100% and 96% and 100% respectively. CEUS allowed better classification of endoleaks in 10, two and one patients compared with CDUS, CTA and MRA, respectively., Conclusions: The accuracy of CEUS in detecting endoleaks after EVAR is markedly better than CDUS and is similar to CTA and MRA. CEUS seems to be a feasible tool in the long-term surveillance after EVAR, and it may better classify endoleaks missed by other imaging techniques., (Copyright © 2010 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)