Search

Molecular screening for pathogenic mutations in sudden cardiac death (SCD)-related genes is common practice for SCD cases. However, test results may lead to uncertainty because of the identification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) occurring in up to 70% of total identified variants due to a lack of experimental studies. Genetic variants affecting potential splice site variants are among the most difficult to interpret. The aim of this study was to examine rare intronic variants identified in the exonic flanking sequence to meet two main objectives: first, to validate that canonical intronic variants produce aberrant splicing; second, to determine whether rare intronic variants predicted as VUS may affect the splicing product. To achieve these objectives, 28 heart samples of cases of SCD carrying rare intronic variants were studied. Samples were analyzed using 85 SCD genes in custom panel sequencing. Our results showed that rare intronic variants affecting the most canonical splice sites displayed in 100% of cases that they would affect the splicing product, possibly causing aberrant isoforms. However, 25% of these cases (1/4) showed normal splicing, contradicting the in silico results. On the contrary, in silico results predicted an effect in 0% of cases, and experimental results showed >20% (3/14) unpredicted aberrant splicing. Thus, deep intron variants are likely predicted to not have an effect, which, based on our results, might be an underestimation of their effect and, therefore, of their pathogenicity classification and family members’ follow-up.

Sudden death cases in the young population remain without a conclusive cause of decease in almost 40% of cases. In these situations, cardiac arrhythmia of genetic origin is suspected as the most plausible cause of death. Molecular autopsy may reveal a genetic defect in up to 20% of families. Most than 80% of rare variants remain classified with an ambiguous role, impeding a useful clinical translation. Our aim was to update rare variants originally classified as of unknown significance to clarify their role. Our cohort included fifty-one post-mortem samples of young cases who died suddenly and without a definite cause of death. Five years ago, molecular autopsy identified at least one rare genetic alteration classified then as ambiguous following the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics' recommendations. We have reclassified the same rare variants including novel data. About 10% of ambiguous variants change to benign/likely benign mainly because of improved population frequencies. Excluding cases who died before one year of age, almost 21% of rare ambiguous variants change to benign/likely benign. This fact makes it important to discard these rare variants as a cause of sudden unexplained death, avoiding anxiety in relatives' carriers. Twenty-five percent of the remaining variants show a tendency to suspicious deleterious role, highlighting clinical follow-up of carriers. Periodical reclassification of rare variants originally classified as ambiguous is crucial, at least updating frequencies every 5 years. This action aids to increase accuracy to enable and conclude a cause of death as well as translation into the clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Molecular screening for pathogenic mutations in sudden cardiac death (SCD)-related genes is common practice for SCD cases. However, test results may lead to uncertainty because of the identification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) occurring in up to 70% of total identified variants due to a lack of experimental studies. Genetic variants affecting potential splice site variants are among the most difficult to interpret. The aim of this study was to examine rare intronic variants identified in the exonic flanking sequence to meet two main objectives: first, to validate that canonical intronic variants produce aberrant splicing; second, to determine whether rare intronic variants predicted as VUS may affect the splicing product. To achieve these objectives, 28 heart samples of cases of SCD carrying rare intronic variants were studied. Samples were analyzed using 85 SCD genes in custom panel sequencing. Our results showed that rare intronic variants affecting the most canonical splice sites displayed in 100% of cases that they would affect the splicing product, possibly causing aberrant isoforms. However, 25% of these cases (1/4) showed normal splicing, contradicting the in silico results. On the contrary, in silico results predicted an effect in 0% of cases, and experimental results showed >20% (3/14) unpredicted aberrant splicing. Thus, deep intron variants are likely predicted to not have an effect, which, based on our results, might be an underestimation of their effect and, therefore, of their pathogenicity classification and family members' follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Copy Number Variants cause arrhythmogenic diseases leading to sudden cardiac death. • Copy Number Variants explain up to 13% of arrhythmogenic cases. • Genetic interpretation of Copy Number Variants is the main current challenge. • Clinical translation of Copy Number Variants should be done with caution. Over the last ten years, analysis of copy number variants has increasingly been applied to the study of arrhythmogenic pathologies associated with sudden death, mainly due to significant advances in the field of massive genetic sequencing. Nevertheless, few published reports have focused on the prevalence of copy number variants associated with sudden cardiac death. As a result, the frequency of these genetic alterations in arrhythmogenic diseases as well as their genetic interpretation and clinical translation has not been established. This review summarizes the current available data concerning copy number variants in sudden cardiac death-related diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]