1. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison with 15 O-water PET.
- Author
-
Otaki Y, Manabe O, Miller RJH, Manrique A, Nganoa C, Roth N, Berman DS, Germano G, Slomka PJ, and Agostini D
- Subjects
- Aged, Algorithms, Coronary Artery Disease diagnostic imaging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motion, Observer Variation, Oxygen Radioisotopes, Radiopharmaceuticals, Reproducibility of Results, Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi, Water, Cadmium, Coronary Artery Disease physiopathology, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial physiology, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography, Tellurium, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Zinc
- Abstract
Background: We compared quantification of MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) with a 99mTc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT to
15 O-water PET., Methods: SPECT MBF for thirty patients in the WATERDAY study was re-analyzed by QPET software with motion correction and optimal placement of the arterial input function.15 O-water PET MBF was re-quantified using dedicated software. Inter-operator variability was assessed using repeatability coefficients (RPC)., Results: Significant correlations were observed between global (r = 0.91, P < 0.001) and regional MBF (r = 0.86, P < 0.001) with SPECT compared to PET. Global MBF (rest 0.95 vs 1.05 ml/min/g, P = 0.07; stress 2.62 vs 2.68 mL/min/g, P = 0.17) and MFR (2.65 vs 2.75, P = 0.86) were similar between SPECT and PET. Rest (0.81 vs 0.98 mL/min/g, P = 0.03) and stress MBF (1.98 vs 2.61 mL/min/g, P = 0.01) in right coronary artery (RCA) were lower with SPECT compared to PET. However, MFR in the RCA territory was similar (2.54 vs 2.77, P = 0.21). The SPECT-PET RPC for global MBFs and MFR were 0.95 mL/min/g and 0.94, with inter-observer RPC of 0.59 mL/min/g and 0.74, respectively., Conclusions: MBF and MFR derived from CZT-SPECT with motion correction and optimal placement of the arterial input function showed good agreement with15 O-water PET, as well as low inter-operator variability., (© 2019. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF