Search

Objective: To analyse whether levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) below their respective 99th percentile can be used as a single parameter to rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at presentation., Design: Prospective, multicentre study., Main Outcome Measures: We measured hs-cTn using four different methods (hs-cTnT Roche, hs-cTnI Siemens, hs-cTnI Beckman Coulter and hs-cTnI Abbott) in consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain. Two independent cardiologists adjudicated the final diagnosis. Patients were followed for death or AMI during a mean period of 24 months., Results: Among 2072 consecutive patients with hs-cTnT measurements available, 21.4% had an adjudicated diagnosis of AMI (sensitivity 89.6%, 95% CI 86.4% to 92.3%, negative predictive value (NPV): 96.5%, 95% CI 95.4% to 97.4%). Among 1180 consecutive patients with hs-cTnI Siemens measurements available, 20.0% had AMI (sensitivity 94.1%, 95% CI 90.3% to 96.7%, NPV: 98.0%, 95% CI: 96.6% to 98.9%). Among 1151 consecutive patients with hs-cTnI Beckman Coulter measurements available, 19.7% had AMI (sensitivity 92.1%, 95% CI 87.8% to 95.2%, NPV: 97.5%, 95% CI 96.0% to 98.5%). Among 1567 consecutive patients with hs-cTnI Abbott measurements available, 20.0% had AMI (sensitivity 77.2%, 95% CI 72.1% to 81.7%, NPV: 94.3%, 95% CI 92.8% to 95.5%)., Conclusions: Normal hs-cTn levels at presentation should not be used as a single parameter to rule out AMI as 6%-23% of adjudicated AMI cases had normal levels of hs-cTn levels at presentation. Our data highlight the lack of standardisation among hs-cTnI assays resulting in substantial differences in sensitivity and NPV at the 99th percentile.

Background: The introduction of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays allows the assessment of clinical decision values below the 99th percentile., Methods: Final diagnosis and one-year mortality were adjudicated in a multicenter, prospective cohort of 1181 patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department. Hs-cTnT (Roche) and cTnI-ultra (Siemens) were measured in a blinded fashion., Results: At presentation hs-cTnT and cTnI-ultra were below the limit of blank (LOB) in 201 (17%) and 549 (47%) patients, below the 75th percentile in 379 (32%) and 623 (53%) patients, below the 95th percentile in 603 (51%) and 808 (68%), and below the 99th percentile in 748 (63%) and 913 (77%), respectively. Sensitivities for the diagnosis of AMI were 100.0% and 96.8% respectively for hs-cTnT and cTnI-ultra (LOB as cut-off value), 99.5% and 96.2% (75th percentile), 96.8% and 93.0% (95th percentile), and 94.1% and 88.1% (99th percentile). The proportion of patients correctly classified as having or not AMI increased from 32.9% (LOB as cut-off value) to 47.8% (75th percentile), 65.9% (95th percentile) and 77.3% (99th percentile) for hs-cTnT and from 61.2% to 67.3%, 81.9% and 89.3% respectively for cTnI-ultra. At 1 year, all-cause mortality was very low and similar for patients below all of these cut-off levels (between 0.7% and 1.5%, p=0.748 for all-groups comparison)., Conclusion: cTn should be considered as a continuous variable. Decision values below the 99th percentile (e.g. the 75th percentile) are associated with a very high NPV for the diagnosis of AMI, but have a lower accuracy than the 99th percentile., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We examined whether undetectable levels of high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin (hs-cTn) can be used to rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with a single blood draw at presentation to the emergency department (ED)., Methods and Results: In a prospective multicenter study we used 4 different hs-cTn assays (hs-cTnT Roche, and hs-cTnI Siemens, hs-cTnI Beckman Coulter and hs-cTnI Abbott) in consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain. The final diagnosis of AMI was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists using all available data including serial hs-cTnT levels. Mean follow up was 24 months. Among 2072 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnT levels, 21% had an adjudicated diagnosis of AMI. Among AMI patients, 98.2% had initially detectable levels of hs-cTnT (sensitivity 98.2%, 95%CI 96.3%-99.2%, negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%, 95%CI 97.0%-99.3%). Undetectable levels of hs-cTnT ruled out AMI in 26.5% of patients at presentation. The NPV was similar with the three hs-cTnI assays: among 1180 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnI (Siemens), the NPV was 98.8%; among 1151 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnI (Beckman Coulter), the NPV was 99.2%; among 1567 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnI (Abbott), the NPV was 100.0%. The percentage of patients with undetectable levels of hs-cTnI was similar among the three hs-cTnI assays and ranged from 11.4% to 13.9%., Conclusions: Undetectable levels of hs-cTn at presentation have a very high NPV and seem to allow the simple and rapid rule out of AMI. This criteria applies to much more patients with hs-TnT as compared to the investigated hs-cTnI assays., (© 2013.)

Background: Current guidelines require a change (rise and/or fall) in levels of cardiac troponin (cTn) for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is unknown whether absolute or relative changes provide higher accuracy when using high-sensitivity cTnI assays., Methods: In a prospective international multicentre study, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of early absolute and relative changes in cTnI measured with two novel pre-commercial high-sensitivity assays (Siemens and Beckman Coulter) in 943 unselected patients presenting to the ED with suspected AMI. The final diagnosis of AMI was adjudicated using all available data including serial hs-cTnT levels by two independent cardiologists., Results: The diagnostic accuracy of absolute changes in the diagnosis of AMI as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was very high (e.g. at 2 h, Siemens high-sensitivity cTnI AUC 0.93, 95%Cl 0.90-0.96; Beckman Coulter high-sensitivity cTnI AUC 0.93, 95%Cl 0.90-0.96) and superior to relative changes at all time points (p < 0.001). The results were consistent in clinically important subgroups. Direct comparison of the absolute changes in the two high-sensitivity cTnI assays showed similar accuracy. When combined with the baseline cTnI levels, the difference between absolute and relative changes became much smaller and remained statistically significant only for the Siemens assay., Conclusions: As single variables early absolute changes in high-sensitivity cTnI levels have significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than relative changes. When combined with the baseline cTn level, reflecting clinical practice, both absolute and relative changes provided very high accuracy with much smaller differences between both approaches., (© 2013.)

Background: Absolute changes in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) seem to have higher diagnostic accuracy in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction compared with relative changes. It is unknown whether the same applies to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays and whether the combination of absolute and relative change might further increase accuracy., Methods: In a prospective, international multicenter study, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) was measured with 3 novel assays (hs-cTnT, Roche Diagnostics Corp, Indianapolis, Ind; hs-cTnI, Beckman Coulter Inc, Brea, Calif; hs-cTnI, Siemens, Munich, Germany) in a blinded fashion at presentation and after 1 and 2 hours in a blinded fashion in 830 unselected patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists., Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction was significantly higher for 1- and 2-hour absolute versus relative hs-cTn changes for all 3 assays (P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the combination of 2-hour absolute and relative change (hs-cTnT 0.98 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.97-0.99]; hs-cTnI, Beckman Coulter Inc, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]; hs-cTnI, Siemens, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99]) were high and provided some benefit compared with the use of absolute change alone for hs-cTnT, but not for the hs-cTnI assays. Reclassification analysis confirmed the superiority of absolute changes versus relative changes., Conclusions: Absolute changes seem to be the preferred metrics for both hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. The combination of absolute and relative changes provides a small added value for hs-cTnT, but not for hs-cTnI., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)