Search

Significance: These results indicate that NF1 loss in intradermal and uveal melanomas is a potentially significant finding. They emphasize the importance of neurofibromin in cAMP signaling. They show for the first time that oncogenic GNAQ can transform Schwann cells in mice. The Plp1-creERT transgene with tamoxifen given at 5 weeks may be a particularly good strategy for modeling cutaneous neurofibroma and plexiform neurofibroma., (©2025 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) is rare. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown modest efficacy in mUM. Tebentafusp prolonged overall survival (OS) in a phase 3 study. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the sequence of tebentafusp and ICIs., Methods: Patients with HLA-A * 02:01 positive mUM, or metastatic GNA11/GNAQ mutant melanocytic tumors treated with tebentafusp followed by ICIs (group 1) or the inverse sequence (group 2) at any treatment line were retrospectively identified. The primary objective was OS rate at 2 years., Results: 131 patients were included; 51 in group 1 and 80 in group 2. 30 % in group 1 % and 40 % in group 2 had normal baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, p = 0.05). 94 % in group 1 % and 77 % in group 2 had multilobular liver disease (p = 0.02). Median OS was 22.4 months (95 % CI 19-24.8) in group 1 and 33.6 months (95 % CI 28.9-43) in group 2 (p = 0.004). Total median PFS was 12 months (95 % CI 10.7-18.8) in group 1 and 20.3 months (95 % CI 17.2-27.3) in group 2 (p = 0.04). The frequency of cytokine release syndrome was higher in group 2 (15 % vs 27 %). Other clinical factors were associated with short total PFS in the multivariable analysis., Conclusions: Both treatment sequences are clinically feasible. A clinical benefit was noted in the sequential combination of ICIs followed by tebentafusp. This observation is limited by the retrospective nature of the study and merits further investigation in prospective clinical trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: FD receives/received honoraria and travel support from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre and Sun Pharma. EKH reports: advisory role; Novartis, MSD; speaker´s Bureau: Novartis, MSD; research Funding: funding paid to Dr. Koch Hein Institution for support of a melanoma registry in Chile; travel, accommodations, expenses: Pfizer, Novartis, Roche Pharma AG. CGM receives/received honoraria for lectures/advisory board and travel support from Pierre Fabre, BMS, MSD. GVL is consultant advisor for Agenus, Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BioNTech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Evaxion, Hexal AG (Sandoz Company), Highlight Therapeutics S.L., IOBiotech, Immunocore, Innovent Biologics USA, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, PHMR Ltd, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Scancell, SkylineDX B.V. O.M. has consulting/advisory roles for Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Amgen, Pierre Fabre, and Neracare; has received research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Amgen; is a consultant advisor or a paid speaker for Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Amgen, and Nektar; has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and Pierre Fabre; and is the cofounder of a cell therapy company called Cellula. DBJ has served on advisory boards or as a consultant for BMS, Catalyst Biopharma, Iovance, The Jackson Laboratory, Mallinckrodt, Merck, Mosaic ImmunoEngineering, Novartis, Oncosec, Pfizer, Targovax, and Teiko, and has received research funding from BMS and Incyte. EK has consultancy/advisory relationships with Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Immunocore and Lilly, and received research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Delcath, Novartis and Pierre-Fabre. Not related to current work and paid to institute. AMJ has received research funding (institution) from Immunocore, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb. RD declares financial interests from Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dhome (MSD), Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Roche, Amgen, Takeda, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Catalym, Second Genome, Regeneron, Alligator, T3 Pharma, MaxiVAX SA, Pfizer, Simcere and touchIME. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Uveal melanoma (UM), the predominant primary ocular malignancy, often progresses to liver metastasis with limited therapeutic options. The interplay of the tumor microenvironment, encompassing secreted soluble factors, plays a crucial role in facilitating liver metastasis. In this study, the role is elucidated of the neural growth factor-inducible gene (VGF), a secreted neuropeptide precursor, in Gαq mutant UM. Employing a multiomics approach, encompassing transcriptomic and secretomic analyses, the intricate involvement of VGF in UM progression is unveiled. VGF is upregulated in Gαq mutant UM cells and associated with poor prognosis of UM patients. Targeting VGF significantly suppressed the growth of UM in vitro and in vivo. Further evidence shows that VGF is regulated by Gαq through MAPK/CREB pathway. Mechanistically, CREB modulates VGF expression by directly binding to consensus DNA response elements in the promoters of the VGF gene. Combined inhibition of Gαq and MEK remarkably reduces tumor burden in the UM xenograft model. Notably, VGF triggers liver metastatic colonization of UM and activates the fibrosis of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), creating a favorable microenvironment, through an autocrine and paracrine loop. Furthermore, VGF directly binds to TGFBR2 and regulates TGF-β-SMAD signaling pathway, thereby regulating genes associated with endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) to promote metastasis. Taken together, these findings identify VGF as a pivotal driver in the progression and metastasis of Gαq mutant UM and confers a promising therapeutic target and strategy for UM patients., (© 2024 The Author(s). Advanced Science published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH.)

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the predominant form of eye cancer. The genes GNAQ and GNA11, encoding Gq and G11 respectively, are most frequently mutated in UM and are considered the major drivers of UM carcinogenesis by activating YAP. However, the mechanisms by which metastatic UM evades the immune system remain poorly understood. In this study, we found that oncogenic mutations of Gq/G11 promoted YAP and PD-L1 expression, modifying the tumor microenvironment and promoting immune evasion of UM. Consistently, the levels of GNAQ/GNA11 and YAP positively correlated to PD-L1 expression in UM patients. Furthermore, silencing YAP or treating with its inhibitor, Verteporfin, attenuated PD-L1 expression induced by Gq/G11 mutations, thereby enhancing T cell activation and T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Collectively, this study reveals a potential role of Gq/G11 mutations on immune evasion of UM, a new mechanism of Gq/11 mutations-induced tumorigenesis, highlighting Gq/G11 and YAP as potential immunotherapeutic targets and suggesting Verteporfin as an adjuvant for immunotherapy of UM patients with GNAQ or GNA11 mutations., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Cell lines are being used in preclinical uveal melanoma (UM) research. Because not all cell lines harbor typical GNAQ or GNA11 hotspot mutations, we aimed at better classifying them and determining whether we could find genetic causes to explain the protein and mRNA expression profiles of the cell lines., Methods: We studied protein and mRNA expression of 14 UM cell lines and determined the presence of single nucleotide variants and small insertions and deletions with next-generation sequencing and copy number alterations with a single nucleotide polymorphism array. The lists of differentially expressed proteins and genes were merged, and shared lists were created, keeping only terms with concordant mRNA and protein expression. Enrichment analyses were performed on the shared lists., Results: Cell lines Mel285 and Mel290 are separate from GNA-mutated cell lines and show downregulation of melanosome-related markers. Both lack typical UM mutations but each harbors four putatively deleterious variants in CTNNB1, PPP1R10, LIMCH1, and APC in Mel285 and ARID1A, PPP1R10, SPG11, and RNF43 in Mel290. The upregulated terms in Mel285 and Mel290 did not point to a convincing alternative origin. Mel285 shows loss of chromosomes 1p, 3p, partial 3q, 6, and partial 8p, whereas Mel290 shows loss of 1p and 6. Expression in the other 12 cell lines was related to BAP1 expression., Conclusions: Although Mel285 and Mel290 have copy number alterations that fit UM, multi-omics analyses show that they belong to a separate group compared to the other analyzed UM cell lines. Therefore, they may not be representative models to test potential therapeutic targets for UM.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a neuroectodermal tumor that results from malignant transformation of melanocytes in the eye uvea, including the iris, the ciliary body, and the choroid. UM accounts for 5% of all melanoma cases and is extremely aggressive with half of the UM patients developing metastases within the first 1-2 years after tumor development. Molecular mechanisms of UM carcinogenesis are poorly understood, but are known to differ from those of skin melanoma. Activating mutations of the GNAQ and GNA11 genes, which code for the large G protein subunits Gq and G11, respectively, are found in 90% of UM patients. The Gaq/PKC/MAPK signaling pathway is a main signaling cascade that leads to the transformation of melanocytes of the uveal tract, and major regulators of the cascade provide targets for the development of drugs. Metastatic UM (MUM) is most often associated with mutations of BAP1, EIF1AX, GNA11, GNAQ, and SF3B1. A combination of a commercial expression test panel of 15 genes and a mutation panel of 7 genes, supplemented with data on the size of the primary tumor, is highly efficient in predicting the risk of metastasis. The risk of metastasis determines the choice of therapy and the patient follow-up regimen. However, no systemic therapy for MUM has been developed to date. New drugs undergoing clinical trials are mostly targeted drugs designed to inhibit the protein products of mutant genes or immunotherapeutic agents designed to stimulate the immune response against specific antigens. In addition to these approaches, potential therapeutic targets of epigenetic regulation of UM development are considered in the review.

Uveal melanoma (UM) represents the predominant ocular malignancy among adults, exhibiting high malignancy and proclivity for liver metastasis. GNAQ and GNA11 encoding Gαq and Gα11 proteins are key genes to drive UM, making the selective inhibition of Gαq/11 proteins to be a potential therapeutic approach for combating UM. In this study, forty-six quinazoline derivatives were designed, synthesized, and assessed for their ability to inhibit Gαq/11 proteins and UM cells. Compound F33 emerged as the most favorable candidate, and displayed moderate inhibitory activity against Gαq/11 proteins (IC 50  = 9.4 μM) and two UM cell lines MP41 (IC 50  = 6.7 μM) and 92.1 (IC 50  = 3.7 μM). Being a small molecule inhibitor of Gαq/11 proteins, F33 could effectively suppress the activation of downstream signaling pathways in a dose-dependent manner, and significantly inhibits UM in vitro.F33 represents a promising lead compound for developing therapeutics for UM by targeting Gαq/11 proteins., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Most uveal melanoma cases harbor activating mutations in either GNAQ or GNA11. Despite activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway downstream of Gαq/11, there are no effective targeted kinase therapies for metastatic uveal melanoma. The human genome encodes numerous understudied kinases, also called the "dark kinome". Identifying additional kinases regulated by Gαq/11 may uncover novel therapeutic targets for uveal melanoma. In this study, we treated GNAQ-mutant uveal melanoma cell lines with a Gαq/11 inhibitor, YM-254890, and conducted a kinase signaling proteomic screen using multiplexed-kinase inhibitors followed by mass spectrometry. We observed downregulated expression and/or activity of 22 kinases. A custom siRNA screen targeting these kinases demonstrated that knockdown of microtubule affinity regulating kinase 3 (MARK3) and serine/threonine kinase 10 (STK10) significantly reduced uveal melanoma cell growth and decreased expression of cell cycle proteins. Additionally, knockdown of MARK3 but not STK10 decreased ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Analysis of RNA-sequencing and proteomic data showed that Gαq signaling regulates STK10 expression and MARK3 activity. Our findings suggest an involvement of STK10 and MARK3 in the Gαq/11 oncogenic pathway and prompt further investigation into the specific roles and targeting potential of these kinases in uveal melanoma., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: A. E. A. has an ownership interest in patent number 9880150 and a pending patent, PCT/US22/76492. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors. M. A. D. has been a consultant to Roche/Genentech, Array, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, GSK, Sanofi-Aventis, Vaccinex, Apexigen, Eisai, Iovance, and ABM Therapeutics, and he has been the PI of research grants to MD Anderson by Roche/Genentech, GSK, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck, Myriad, Oncothyreon, ABM Therapeutics, and LEAD Pharma. J. S. G. has been a consultant for Domain Pharmaceuticals, Pangea Therapeutics, and io9, and is the founder of Kadima Pharmaceuticals, all unrelated to the current study. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most prevalent cancer of the eye in adults, driven by activating mutation of GNAQ/GNA11; however, there are limited therapies against UM and metastatic UM (mUM). Here, we perform a high-throughput chemogenetic drug screen in GNAQ-mutant UM contrasted with BRAF-mutant cutaneous melanoma, defining the druggable landscape of these distinct melanoma subtypes. Across all compounds, darovasertib demonstrates the highest preferential activity against UM. Our investigation reveals that darovasertib potently inhibits PKC as well as PKN/PRK, an AGC kinase family that is part of the "dark kinome." We find that downstream of the Gαq-RhoA signaling axis, PKN converges with ROCK to control FAK, a mediator of non-canonical Gαq-driven signaling. Strikingly, darovasertib synergizes with FAK inhibitors to halt UM growth and promote cytotoxic cell death in vitro and in preclinical metastatic mouse models, thus exposing a signaling vulnerability that can be exploited as a multimodal precision therapy against mUM., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests J.S.G. reports consulting fees from Domain Pharmaceuticals, Pangea Therapeutics, and io9 and is founder of Kadima Pharmaceuticals, all unrelated to the current study. J.S.G. and N.A. hold patent US11679113B2 related in part to this work. The Krogan Laboratory has received research support from Vir Biotechnology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, and Rezo Therapeutics. N.J.K. has financially compensated consulting agreements with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, Maze Therapeutics, Interline Therapeutics, Rezo Therapeutics, Gen1E Lifesciences, Inc., and Twist Bioscience Corp. He is on the Board of Directors of Rezo Therapeutics and is a shareholder in Tenaya Therapeutics, Maze Therapeutics, Rezo Therapeutics, and Interline Therapeutics. D.L.S. has a consulting agreement with Maze Therapeutics. J.B. is a consultant for Rocket Pharma. J.A.P. and S.C. are employees of Verastem, which has not influenced this study. Other authors declare no competing financial interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) patients typically survive only 2 to 3 years because effective therapy does not yet exist. Here, to facilitate the discovery of therapeutic targets in UM, we have identified protein kinase signaling mechanisms elicited by the drivers in 90% of UM tumors: mutant constitutively active G protein α-subunits encoded by GNAQ (Gq) or GNA11 (G11). We used the highly specific Gq/11 inhibitor FR900359 (FR) to elucidate signaling networks that drive proliferation, metabolic reprogramming, and dedifferentiation of UM cells. We determined the effects of FR on the proteome and phosphoproteome of UM cells as indicated by bioinformatic analyses with CausalPath and site-specific gene set enrichment analysis. We found that inhibition of oncogenic Gq/11 caused deactivation of PKC, Erk, and the cyclin-dependent kinases CDK1 and CDK2 that drive proliferation. Inhibition of oncogenic Gq/11 in UM cells with low metastatic risk relieved inhibitory phosphorylation of polycomb-repressive complex subunits that regulate melanocytic redifferentiation. Site-specific gene set enrichment analysis, unsupervised analysis, and functional studies indicated that mTORC1 and 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 2 drive metabolic reprogramming in UM cells. Together, these results identified protein kinase signaling networks driven by oncogenic Gq/11 that regulate critical aspects of UM cell biology and provide targets for therapeutic investigation., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest M. D. O. and K. J. B. are listed as co-inventors on a provisional patent application on TARGETED PHARMACOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS IN UVEAL MELANOMA that is owned by Washington University in St. Louis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common ocular malignancy in adults. Nearly 95% of UM patients carry the mutually exclusive mutations in the homologous genes GNAQ (amino acid change Q209L/Q209P) and GNA11 (aminoacid change Q209L). UM is located in an immunosuppressed organ and does not suffer immunoediting. Therefore, we hypothesize that driver mutations in GNAQ/11 genes could be recognized by the immune system. Genomic and transcriptomic data from primary uveal tumors were collected from the TCGA-UM dataset ( n  = 80) and used to assess the immunogenic potential for GNAQ/GNA11 Q209L/Q209P mutations using a variety of tools and HLA type information. All prediction tools showed stronger GNAQ/11 Q209L binding to HLA than GNAQ/11 Q209P. The immunogenicity analysis revealed that Q209L is likely to be presented by more than 73% of individuals in 1000 G databases whereas Q209P is only predicted to be presented in 24% of individuals. GNAQ/11 Q209L showed a higher likelihood to be presented by HLA-I molecules than almost all driver mutations analyzed. Finally, samples carrying Q209L had a higher immune-reactive phenotype. Regarding cancer risk, seven HLA genotypes with low Q209L affinity show higher frequency in uveal melanoma patients than in the general population. However, no clear association was found between any HLA genotype and survival. Results suggest a high potential immunogenicity of the GNAQ/11 Q209L variant that could allow the generation of novel therapeutic tools to treat UM like neoantigen vaccinations., Competing Interests: Dr Josep M Piulats has acted as a consultant or advisor for Roche, Novartis, Bristol Meyers Squibb, MSD Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, Clovis, VCN Biosciences, Janssen, Astellas, Bayer, Sanofi Genzyme, and Pfizer; received research funding from Pfizer, Merck Serono, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, VCN Biosciences, Astellas, and Janssen; and received financial support for attending symposia from Roche, Janssen, and Ipsen., (© 2023 IDIBELL. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.)

Purpose: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a tumor of the eye that metastasizes in approximately half of cases. Prognostic testing requires accessibility to tumor tissue, which is usually not available with eye-preserving therapies. Noninvasive approaches to prognostic testing that provide valuable information for patient care are therefore needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of circulating cell-free plasma DNA analysis in UM patients undergoing brachytherapy., Methods: The study recruited 26 uveal melanoma patients referred to the department between February and October 2020. Blood samples were collected at various time points before, during, and after treatment, and deep amplicon sequencing was used to identify oncogenic variant alleles of the GNAQ and GNA11 genes, which serve as indicators for the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)., Results: The results showed that all patients were ctDNA negative before brachytherapy. In 31% of patients, ctDNA was detected during therapy. The variant allele fraction of GNAQ or GNA11 alleles in ctDNA positive samples ranged from 0.24% to 2% and correlates with the largest basal diameter and thickness of the tumor., Conclusions: The findings suggest that brachytherapy increases the presence of tumor DNA in the plasma of UM patients. Thus ctDNA analysis may offer a noninvasive approach for prognostic testing. However, efforts are still required to lower the limit of detection for tumor-specific genetic alterations.

Activating non-inherited mutations in the guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(q) subunit alpha (GNAQ) gene family have been identified in childhood vascular tumors. Patients experience extensive disfigurement, chronic pain and severe complications including a potentially lethal coagulopathy termed Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon. Animal models for this class of vascular tumors do not exist. This has severely hindered the discovery of the molecular consequences of GNAQ mutations in the vasculature and, in turn, the preclinical development of effective targeted therapies. Here we report a mouse model expressing hyperactive mutant GNAQ in endothelial cells. Mutant mice develop vascular and coagulopathy phenotypes similar to those seen in patients. Mechanistically, by transcriptomic analysis we demonstrate increased mitogen activated protein kinase signaling in the mutant endothelial cells. Targeting of this pathway with Trametinib suppresses the tumor growth by reducing vascular cell proliferation and permeability. Trametinib also prevents the development of coagulopathy and improves mouse survival., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

There is no published data regarding the molecular alterations of Polish patients with primary uveal melanoma. We performed whole exome sequencing of 20 primary uveal melanomas (UMs), 10 metastasizing and 10 non-metastasizing cases to identify significant molecular alterations. We detected mutations and copy number variants in the BAP1 gene in 50% (10 cases) of the cases. GNA11 mutations were detected in 50% (10 cases) including nine p.Q209L and one p.R183C. GNAQ mutations gene were detected in 40% (8 cases) and all were p.Q209P. SF3B1, EIF1AX, PLCB4 , and PALB2 mutations were detected in one case each. Genetic aberrations of FBXW7 were detected in 55% of cases, with copy number loss of 10 and missense mutation in one. Gain or loss of copy number was observed in 60%, 60%, and 10% of cases in MYC, MLH1 , and CDKN2A genes, respectively. BAP1 and GNAQ tumor suppressor genes are more often mutated in UM with metastasis, while GNA11 mutations are more frequently detected in non-metastasizing tumors. MYC copy gain was present twice as frequently (80% versus 40%) in cases with versus those without metastases. BAP1 mutation correlated with worse overall survival; while GNA11 mutation and CDKN2A loss correlated with better and worse progression-free survival, respectively. We have confirmed BAP1 prognostic potential and documented frequent MYC amplification in metastasizing cases. Although GNA11 mutation and CDKN2A loss significantly correlated with progression-free survival in our study, our sample size is small. The prognostic significance of GNAQ/GNA11 mutation and CDKN2A loss would require further investigation., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular tumor in adults, and up to 50% of patients develop metastatic disease, which remains uncurable. Because patients with metastatic UM have an average survival of less than 1 year after diagnosis, there is an urgent need to develop new treatment strategies. Although activating mutations in Gαq or Gα11 proteins are major drivers of pathogenesis, the therapeutic intervention of downstream Gαq/11 targets has been unsuccessful in treating UM, possibly due to alternative signaling pathways and/or resistance mechanisms. Activation of the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) signaling pathway promotes cell growth, metastasis, and drug resistance in many types of cancers, including UM, where expression of the IGF1 receptor (IGF1R) correlates with a poor prognosis. In this article, we show that direct inhibition of Gαq/11 by the cyclic depsipeptide YM-254890 in combination with inhibition of IGF1R by linsitinib cooperatively inhibits downstream signaling and proliferation of UM cells. We further demonstrate that a 2-week combination treatment of 0.3 to 0.4 mg/kg of YM-254890 administered by intraperitoneal injection and 25 to 40 mg/kg linsitinib administered by oral gavage effectively inhibits the growth of metastatic UM tumors in immunodeficient NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice and identifies the IGF1 pathway as a potential resistance mechanism in response to Gαq/11 inhibition in UM. These data suggest that the combination of Gαq/11 and IGF1R inhibition provides a promising therapeutic strategy to treat metastatic UM., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objective: To analyze the genetic features of melanocytomas and melanomas of the anterior uvea and assess the value of molecular testing for diagnosis and prognostication., Design: Retrospective case-control study., Subjects: Patients with melanocytoma (n = 16) and melanoma (n = 19) of the anterior uvea., Methods: Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue from anterior uveal melanocytic tumors and correlated with clinicopathologic features., Main Outcome Measures: Presence or absence of accompanying oncogenic alterations beyond GNAQ/GNA11 and their association with histologic features and local recurrence., Results: Hotspot missense mutations in GNAQ/GNA11 were identified in 91% (32/35) of all cases. None of the melanocytomas with or without atypia demonstrated chromosomal imbalances or additional oncogenic variants beyond GNAQ mutation, and none recurred over a median follow-up of 36 months. Additional alterations identified in a subset of melanomas include mutations in BAP1 (n = 3), EIF1AX (n = 4), SRSF2 (n = 1), PTEN (n = 1), and EP300 (n = 1); monosomy 3p (n = 6); trisomy 6p (n = 3); trisomy 8q (n = 2); and an ultraviolet mutational signature (n = 5). Local recurrences were limited to melanomas, all of which demonstrated oncogenic alterations in addition to GNAQ/GNA11 (n = 5). A single melanoma harboring GNAQ and BAP1 mutations and monosomy 3 was the only tumor that metastasized., Conclusions: In this study, anterior segment uveal melanocytomas did not display oncogenic alterations beyond GNAQ/GNA11. Therefore, they are genetically similar to uveal nevi rather than uveal melanoma based on their molecular features known from the literature. Molecular testing can be performed on borderline cases to aid risk stratification and clinical management decisions., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Uveal melanoma is a rare malignancy affecting 5.1 patients/million per year with definitive treatment options of enucleation or radiation therapy to the primary tumor. Unfortunately, no FDA-approved systemic therapies exist for patients in the adjuvant or metastatic setting. Molecular profiling over the past decade has helped define uveal melanomas by characteristic mutations: GNAQ, GNA11, BAP1, SF3B1, and EIF1AX mutations. GNAQ/11 mutations are present in over 90% of patients with uveal melanoma and lead to signal transduction through G-protein coupled receptors to downstream growth factors. PKC inhibition has been an active area of investigation targeting this pathway specific to uveal melanoma. Several molecules have been developed and evaluated in clinical trials. Responses have been noted but clinical development has also yielded multiple toxicities and pathways of resistance limiting both breadth and durability of responses leading to combination therapy approaches. PKC inhibition remains an active and encouraging area of research to determine effective therapies for patients with uveal melanoma., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare cancer arising from melanocytes in the uveal tract of the eye. Despite effective primary treatment, there is no approved therapy for metastatic UM and prognosis and survival remain poor. Over 90% of UM are driven by mutations affecting the Gα subunits encoded by the GNAQ and GNA11 genes. These mutations activate downstream and targetable signaling pathways, including the protein kinase C (PKC) cascade. PKC inhibitors have been used in clinical trials for metastatic UM but have shown limited efficacy. In this study, we examined the signaling and functional effects of two PKC inhibitors (AEB071 and IDE196) in a panel of UM cell models. In response to PKC inhibition, all UM cell lines showed potent suppression of PKC activity, but this was not sufficient to predict PKC inhibitor sensitivity and only two UM cell lines showed substantial PKC inhibitor-induced cell death. The differences in UM cell responses to PKC inhibition were not attributable to the degree or timing of PKC suppression or inhibition of the downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) or phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathways. Instead, UM cell show complex, PKC-independent signaling pathways that contribute to their survival and resistance to targeted therapies., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

More than 85% of patients with uveal melanoma (UM) carry a GNAQ or GNA11 mutation at a hotspot codon (Q209) that encodes G protein α subunit q/11 polypeptides (Gα q/11 ). GNAQ/11 relies on palmitoylation for membrane association and signal transduction. Despite the palmitoylation of GNAQ/11 was discovered long before, its implication in UM remains unclear. Here, results of palmitoylation-targeted mutagenesis and chemical interference approaches revealed that the loss of GNAQ/11 palmitoylation substantially affected tumor cell proliferation and survival in UM cells. Palmitoylation inhibition through the mutation of palmitoylation sites suppressed GNAQ/11 Q209L -induced malignant transformation in NIH3T3 cells. Importantly, the palmitoylation-deficient oncogenic GNAQ/11 failed to rescue the cell death initiated by the knock down of endogenous GNAQ/11 oncogenes in UM cells, which are much more dependent on Gα q/11 signaling for cell survival and proliferation than other melanoma cells without GNAQ/11 mutations. Furthermore, the palmitoylation inhibitor, 2-bromopalmitate, also specifically disrupted Gα q/11 downstream signaling by interfering with the MAPK pathway and BCL2 survival pathway in GNAQ/11-mutant UM cells and showed a notable synergistic effect when applied in combination with the BCL2 inhibitor, ABT-199, in vitro. The findings validate that GNAQ/11 palmitoylation plays a critical role in UM and may serve as a promising therapeutic target for GNAQ/11-driven UM., (© 2022. Higher Education Press.)

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary malignancy of the adult eye but lacks any FDA-approved therapy for the deadly metastatic disease. Thus, there is a great need to dissect the driving mechanisms for UM and develop strategies to evaluate potential therapeutics. Using an autochthonous zebrafish model, we previously identified MITF, the master melanocyte transcription factor, as a tumor suppressor in GNAQ Q209L -driven UM. Here, we show that zebrafish mitfa-deficient GNAQ Q209L -driven tumors significantly up-regulate neural crest markers, and that higher expression of a melanoma-associated neural crest signature correlates with poor UM patient survival. We further determined how the mitfa-null state, as well as expression of GNAQ Q209L , YAP S127A;S381A , or BRAF V600E oncogenes, impacts melanocyte lineage cells before they acquire the transformed state. Specifically, examination 5 days post-fertilization showed that mitfa-deficiency is sufficient to up-regulate pigment progenitor and neural crest markers, while GNAQ Q209L expression promotes a proliferative phenotype that is further enhanced by YAP S127A;S381A co-expression. Finally, we show that this oncogene-induced proliferative phenotype can be used to screen chemical inhibitors for their efficacy against the UM pathway. Overall, this study establishes that a neural crest signature correlates with poor UM survival, and describes an in vivo assay for preclinical trials of potential UM therapeutics., (© 2022 The Authors. Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To identify therapeutic targets and correlate with clinical outcomes from mutation profiling of metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) using next-generation sequencing (NGS)., Methods: Melanoma cases that were tested using DNA-based NGS panels of 25 and/or 214 genes were evaluated retrospectively (263 cases) and identified 27 UM cases. BAP1 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry., Results: Mutations in GNA11 (14) and GNAQ (12) were found in 96% (n = 27) of cases of UM, and most had coexisting BAP1 (17) or SF3B1 (4) mutations. Coexisting GNAQ/11-SF3B1 mutations correlated with a longer average time to first metastasis compared with GNAQ/11-BAP1 mutations (99.7 vs 38.5 months, P = .047). Three patients with BAP1 mutations received trametinib; two are still alive (15 months; 23 months), and one died (32 months). In non-UMs, only 4.2% (n = 236) had BAP1 and 3.8% had SF3B1 mutations; none had coexisting GNAQ/11 mutations., Conclusions: Coexisting BAP1/SF3B1 and GNAQ/11 mutations were unique to UM. SF3B1 mutations were reported to be UM-specific in melanoma and associated with rare/no metastasis. The finding of mutated SF3B1 in 14.8% (n = 27) of UMs suggests its role should be further evaluated. The correlation of BAP1/SF3B1 mutation with survival also warrants investigation., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Aim of the Study: Mutations in the Gα-genes GNAQ and GNA11 are found in 85-90% of uveal melanomas (UM). Aim of the study is to understand whether the mutations in both genes differentially affect tumor characteristics and outcome and if so, to identify potential mechanisms., Methods: We analyzed the association between GNAQ and GNA11 mutations with disease-specific survival, gene expression profiles, and cytogenetic alterations in 219 UMs. We used tandem-affinity-purification, mass spectrometry and immunoprecipitation to identify protein interaction partners of the two G-proteins and analyzed their impact on DNA-methylation., Results: GNA11 mutation was associated with: i) an increased frequency of loss of BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) expression (p = 0.0005), ii) monosomy of chromosome 3 (p < 0.001), iii) amplification of chr8q (p = 0.038), iv) the combination of the latter two (p = 0.0002), and inversely with v) chr6p gain (p = 0.003). Our analysis also showed a shorter disease-specific survival of GNA11-mutated cases as compared to those carrying a GNAQ mutation (HR = 1.97 [95%CI 1.12-3.46], p = 0.02). GNAQ and GNA11 encoded G-proteins have different protein interaction partners. Specifically, the Tet Methylcytosine Dioxygenase 2 (TET2), a protein that is involved in DNA demethylation, physically interacts with the GNAQ protein but not with GNA11, as confirmed by immunoprecipitation analyses. High-risk UM cases show a clearly different DNA-methylation pattern, suggesting that a different regulation of DNA methylation by the two G-proteins might convey a different risk of progression., Conclusions: GNA11 mutated uveal melanoma has worse prognosis and is associated with high risk cytogenetic, mutational and molecular tumor characteristics that might be determined at least in part by differential DNA-methylation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Unlike cutaneous melanoma, uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by mutations in GNAQ and GNA11 and remains a fatal disease because there is essentially no effective targeted therapy or immunotherapy available. We report the discovery of the copper ionophore elesclomol as a GNAQ/11-specific UM inhibitor. Elesclomol was identified in a differential cytotoxicity screen of an in-house tool compound library, and its in vivo pharmacological efficacy was further confirmed in zebrafish and mouse UM models. Mechanistically, elesclomol transports copper to mitochondria and produces a large amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as Cu(II) is reduced to Cu(I) in GNAQ/11-mutant UM cells, which selectively activates LATS1 kinase in the Hippo signaling pathway and consequently promotes YAP phosphorylation and inhibits its nuclear accumulation. The inactivation of YAP downregulates the expression of SNAI2, which in turn suppresses the migration of UM cells. These findings were cross validated by our clinical observation that YAP activation was found specifically in UM samples with a GNAQ/11 mutation. Furthermore, addition of binimetinib, a MEK inhibitor, to elesclomol increased its synthetic lethality to GNAQ/11-mutant UM cells, thereby overriding drug resistance. This effect was confirmed in an orthotopic xenograft model and in a patient-derived xenograft model of UM. These studies reveal a novel mechanistic basis for repurposing elesclomol by showing that copper homeostasis is a GNAQ/11-specific vulnerability in UM. Elesclomol may provide a new therapeutic path for selectively targeting malignant GNAQ/11-mutant UM., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) and uveal melanoma (UM) both originate from the melanocytic lineage but are primarily driven by distinct oncogenic drivers, BRAF/NRAS or GNAQ/GNA11, respectively. The melanocytic master transcriptional regulator, MITF, is essential for both CM development and maintenance, but its role in UM is largely unexplored. Here, we use zebrafish models to dissect the key UM oncogenic signaling events and establish the role of MITF in UM tumors. Using a melanocytic lineage expression system, we showed that patient-derived mutations of GNAQ (GNAQQ209L) or its upstream CYSLTR2 receptor (CYSLTR2L129Q) both drive UM when combined with a cooperating mutation, tp53M214K/M214K. The tumor-initiating potential of the major GNAQ/11 effector pathways, YAP, and phospholipase C-β (PLCβ)–ERK was also investigated in this system and thus showed that while activated YAP (YAPAA) induced UM with high potency, the patient-derived PLCβ4 mutation (PLCB4D630Y) very rarely yielded UM tumors in the tp53M214K/M214K context. Remarkably, mitfa deficiency was profoundly UM promoting, dramatically accelerating the onset and progression of tumors induced by Tg(mitfa:GNAQQ209L);tp53M214K/M214K or Tg(mitfa:CYSLTR2L129Q);tp53M214K/M214K. Moreover, mitfa loss was sufficient to cooperate with GNAQQ209L to drive tp53–wild type UM development and allowed Tg(mitfa:PLCB4D630Y);tp53M214K/M214K melanocyte lineage cells to readily form tumors. Notably, all of the mitfa−/− UM tumors, including those arising in Tg(mitfa:PLCB4D630Y);tp53M214K/M214K;mitfa−/− zebrafish, displayed nuclear YAP while lacking hyperactive ERK indicative of PLCβ signaling. Collectively, these data show that YAP signaling is the major mediator of UM and that MITF acts as a bona fide tumor suppressor in UM in direct opposition to its essential role in CM.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, and its metastases are known to be fatal. It is critical to identify molecular markers to be used in potential prognostic evaluation for early diagnosis, treatment, and metastasis or to investigate all aspects of known genetic anomalies. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the eight genes (GNAQ, GNA11, BAP1, SF3B1, SRSF2, EIF1AX, PLCB4, and CYSLTR2) that are associated with the most common genetic anomalies in UM from a molecular perspective. The genome sequences and expression profiles of 108 UM patients were obtained via bioinformatics tools that provide data from TCGA. The overall mutational load and the mutation patterns for eight genes, in particular, were thoroughly determined. Moreover, PolyPhen2 and SNAP 2 tools were used to estimate the oncogenic/pathogenic properties of identified mutations for UM. In addition to the mutation profile, the effects of the presence of a mutation on gene expression and survival were determined. Finally, STRING network analysis was performed to better understand the functional relationships of mutated proteins in cellular processes. There were 27 missense mutations, 16 frameshift mutations, six nonsense mutations, and three splice region mutations among the 52 mutations found in eight genes, and 26 of them had pathogenic properties. BAP1 m-RNA expression was significantly lower in tumors with the mutant genotype ( p = .001). The impact of gene expression, which has poor prognostic importance, on survival is statistically significant for high-expressed BAP1 ( p = .0015) and low-expressed CYSLTR2 ( p = .0021). To assess the current state of this potentially devastating disease, a molecular perspective has been evaluated. Defining this molecular perspective can be useful in developing targeted drug therapies and personalized medicine.

Uveal melanoma(UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. However, the incidence of UM in Asia is 10 to 20 times less than in Western populations. Therefore, for the first time, we report our whole exome sequencing (WES) data analysis to discover differences in the molecular features of Asian and Western UM, and to determine the disparities between the primary tumor before brachytherapy and enucleated samples after brachytherapy. WES of 19 samples (13 primary tumors, 5 enucleation samples after brachytherapy, and 1 liver metastasis) from 13 patients diagnosed with UM and treated between 2007 and 2019 at the Yonsei University Health System (YUHS) were analyzed using bioinformatics pipelines. We identified significantly altered genes in Asian UM and changes in mutational profiles before and after brachytherapy using various algorithms. GNAQ, BAP1, GNA11, SF3B1 and CYSLTR2 were significantly mutated in Asian UM, which is similar that reported frequently in previous Western-based UM studies. There were also similar copy number alterations (M3, 1p loss, 6p gain, 8q gain) in both groups. In paired comparisons of the same patients, DICER1 and LRP1B were distinctly mutated only in tumor samples obtained after brachytherapy using rare-variant association tests (P = 0.01, 0.01, respectively). The mutational profiles of Asian UM were generally similar to the data from previous Western-based studies. DICER1 and LRP1B were newly mutated genes with statistical significance in the regrowth samples after brachytherapy compared to the primary tumors, which may be related to resistance to brachytherapy., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Over 90% of uveal melanomas harbor pathogenic variants of the GNAQ or GNA11 genes that activate survival pathways. As previous studies found that Ras-mutated cell lines were vulnerable to a combination of survival pathway inhibitors and the histone-deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin, we investigated whether this combination would be effective in models of uveal melanoma., Methods: A small-scale screen of inhibitors of bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4; OTX-015), extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK; ulixertinib), mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR; AZD-8055), or phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K; GDC-0941) combined with a clinically relevant administration of romidepsin was performed on a panel of uveal melanoma cell lines (92.1, Mel202, MP38, and MP41) and apoptosis was quantified by flow cytometry after 48 hours. RNA sequencing analysis was performed on Mel202 cells treated with romidepsin alone, AZD-8055 alone, or the combination, and protein changes were validated by immunoblot., Results: AZD-8055 with romidepsin was the most effective combination in inducing apoptosis in the cell lines. Increased caspase-3 and PARP cleavage were noted in the cell lines when they were treated with romidepsin and mTOR inhibitors. RNA sequencing analysis of Mel202 cells revealed that apoptosis was the most affected pathway in the romidepsin/AZD-8055-treated cells. Increases in pro-apoptotic BCL2L11 and decreases in anti-apoptotic BIRC5 and BCL2L1 transcripts noted in the sequencing analysis were confirmed at the protein level in Mel202 cells., Conclusions: Our data suggest that romidepsin in combination with mTOR inhibition could be an effective treatment strategy against uveal melanoma due in part to changes in apoptotic proteins.

Purpose: Uveal melanoma is the most common eye cancer in adults. Approximately 50% of patients with uveal melanoma develop metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) in the liver, even after successful treatment of the primary lesions. mUM is refractory to current chemo- and immune-therapies, and most mUM patients die within a year. Uveal melanoma is characterized by gain-of-function mutations in GNAQ / GNA11 , encoding Gαq proteins. We have recently shown that the Gαq-oncogenic signaling circuitry involves a noncanonical pathway distinct from the classical activation of PLCβ and MEK-ERK. GNAQ promotes the activation of YAP1, a key oncogenic driver, through focal adhesion kinase (FAK), thereby identifying FAK as a druggable signaling hub downstream from GNAQ . However, targeted therapies often activate compensatory resistance mechanisms leading to cancer relapse and treatment failure., Experimental Design: We performed a kinome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 sgRNA screen to identify synthetic lethal gene interactions that can be exploited therapeutically. Candidate adaptive resistance mechanisms were investigated by cotargeting strategies in uveal melanoma and mUM in vitro and in vivo experimental systems., Results: sgRNAs targeting the PKC and MEK-ERK signaling pathways were significantly depleted after FAK inhibition, with ERK activation representing a predominant resistance mechanism. Pharmacologic inhibition of MEK and FAK showed remarkable synergistic growth-inhibitory effects in uveal melanoma cells and exerted cytotoxic effects, leading to tumor collapse in uveal melanoma xenograft and liver mUM models in vivo ., Conclusions: Coupling the unique genetic landscape of uveal melanoma with the power of unbiased genetic screens, our studies reveal that FAK and MEK-ERK cotargeting may provide a new network-based precision therapeutic strategy for mUM treatment. See related commentary by Harbour, p. 2967 ., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Through a synthetic lethal screen, ERK activation was found to mediate resistance to FAK inhibition in GNAQ-mutant uveal melanoma. With PLCB-PKC-ERK and Trio-FAK-Yap representing compensatory effectors of mutant Gαq signaling, combined inhibition of both pathways may be a promising therapeutic strategy in metastatic uveal melanoma. See related article by Paradis et al., p. 3190 ., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Primary leptomeningeal melanomas are rare, comprising less than one percent of all brain tumours. They are aggressive and radioresistant tumours, with a poor prognosis. The mainstay of treatment is complete surgical resection and chemotherapy with limited success. Distinguishing a primary leptomeningeal melanoma from the more common metastatic disease can be difficult, and often requires the use of ancillary molecular testing. Primary central nervous system melanomas, including uveal melanomas, frequently exhibit mutations in GNAQ and GNA11, rare in the cutaneous and mucosal counterparts.A case of a primary leptomeningeal melanoma of the cerebellopontine angle is described. Molecular studies identified a GNA11 p.Q209L and a KIT p.M541L missense variant, with losses of chromosomes 1p and 3p demonstrated with cytogenetic studies. Complete surgical resection was not possible and leptomeningeal metastatic disease rapidly ensued despite immunotherapy. Further understanding of the molecular signature may translate to improved diagnosis, prognostication and development of targeted therapies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose of Review: To review recent advancements in the genetic understanding, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of uveal melanoma (UM)., Recent Findings: UM is a molecularly distinct melanocytic malignancy driven by mutations in GNAQ or GNA11, with mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway upregulation. Earlier diagnosis and treatment are important factors for improving life prognosis. These goals can be aided by more objective multimodal imaging risk factors for the prediction of malignant nevus transformation and novel treatment strategies such as customized radiation fields and nanoparticle therapy to reduce vision-threatening treatment side effects. The risk for metastatic disease can be reliably predicted through gene expression profiling or the Cancer Genome Atlas project classification, and combined use of clinical tumor features with molecular data allows for highly individualized patient prognosis. Patients with high-risk UM should be considered for clinical trials of adjuvant therapy to prevent metastatic disease. For patients with clinically evident metastasis, combination immunotherapy regimens, T cell-based therapies, and focal adhesion kinase inhibitors offer hope for improved clinical response rates., Summary: Improved understanding of UM molecular pathogenesis and clinical trials of targeted therapy for prevention and treatment of metastatic disease may improve patient survival for this challenging disease., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine whether the GNAQ/11 mutation correlated with the outcome of patients with uveal melanoma (UM) when genetic heterogeneity was considered., Methods: We performed a retrospective study of sixty-seven patients with UM. The heterogeneity of GNAQ/11 was examined by using droplet digital PCR. The correlation between metastasis and heterogeneity of the GNAQ/11 mutation was analysed. Disease free survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Wilcoxon log-rank test was used to compare the curves., Results: The GNAQ/11 mutation ratio was varied between each case. Among these patients, 28.35% of them harboured homogeneous mutation of GNAQ/11, 62.69% present heterogeneous mutation and 8.96% didn't present either GNAQ or GNA11 mutation. The tumour with heterogeneous mutation of GNAQ/11 has a higher metastatic rate than that with homogeneous mutation (13/29 vs 1/18, p=0.027). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, metastasis-free survival was not significantly associated with either homogeneous or heterogeneous mutation of GNAQ/11., Conclusion: The mutation ratio of GNAQ/11 in UM was quite variable. The tumour with heterogeneous mutation of GNAQ/11 is more likely to develop a poor prognosis than that with homogeneous mutation of GNAQ/11., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: All uveal melanoma and a fraction of other melanoma subtypes are driven by activation of the G-protein alpha-q (Gα q ) pathway. Targeting these melanomas has proven difficult despite advances in the molecular understanding of key driver signaling pathways in the disease pathogenesis. Inhibitors of Gα q have shown promising preclinical results, but their therapeutic activity in distinct Gα q mutational contexts and in vivo have remained elusive., Experimental Design: We used an isogenic melanocytic cellular system to systematically examine hotspot mutations in GNAQ (e.g., G48V, R183Q, Q209L) and CYSLTR2 (L129Q) found in human uveal melanoma. This cellular system and human uveal melanoma cell lines were used in vitro and in in vivo xenograft studies to assess the efficacy of Gα q inhibition as a single agent and in combination with MEK inhibition., Results: We demonstrate that the Gα q inhibitor YM-254890 inhibited downstream signaling and in vitro growth in all mutants. In vivo , YM-254890 slowed tumor growth but did not cause regression in human uveal melanoma xenografts. Through comprehensive transcriptome analysis, we observed that YM-254890 caused inhibition of the MAPK signaling with evidence of rebound by 24 hours and combination treatment of YM-254890 and a MEK inhibitor led to sustained MAPK inhibition. We further demonstrated that the combination caused synergistic growth inhibition in vitro and tumor shrinkage in vivo ., Conclusions: These data suggest that the combination of Gα q and MEK inhibition provides a promising therapeutic strategy and improved therapeutic window of broadly targeting Gα q in uveal melanoma. See related commentary by Neelature Sriramareddy and Smalley, p. 1217 ., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Most uveal melanomas harbor mutations in Gαq and show constitutive MAPK activation. Although MEK inhibition has some efficacy against uveal melanoma, clinical responses are typically poor. The Gαq inhibitor-MEK inhibitor combination showed prolonged suppression of MAPK signaling in preclinical uveal melanoma models and led to improved therapeutic responses. See related article by Hitchman et al., p. 1476 ., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The crosstalk between Notch and MAPK pathway plays a role in MEK inhibitor resistance in BRAF V600E metastatic melanoma (MM) and promotes migration in GNAQ Q209L uveal melanoma (UM) cells. We determined the cytotoxicity of combinatorial inhibition of MEK and Notch by cobimetinib and γ-secretase inhibitor (GSI) nirogacestat, in BRAF V600E and BRAF wt MM and GNAQ Q209L UM cells displaying different Erk1/2 and Notch activation status, with the aim to elucidate the impact of Notch signaling in the response to MEK inhibitor. Overall the combination was synergic in BRAF V600E MM and GNAQ Q209L UM cells and antagonistic in BRAF wt one. Focusing on UM cells, we found that cobimetinib resulted in G0/G1 phase arrest and apoptosis induction, whereas the combination with GSI increased treatment efficacy by inducing a senescent-like state of cells and by blocking migration towards liver cancer cells. Mechanistically, this was reflected in a strong reduction of cyclin D1, in the inactivation of retinoblastoma protein and in the increase of p27 KIP1 expression levels. Of note, each drug alone prevented Notch signaling activation resulting in inhibition of c-jun(Ser63) and Hes-1 expression. The combination achieved the strongest inhibition on Notch signaling and on both c-jun(Ser63) and Erk1/2 activation level. In conclusion we unveiled a coordinate action of MAPK and Notch signaling in promoting proliferation of BRAF V600E MM and GNAQ Q209L UM cells. Remarkably, the simultaneous inhibition of MEK and Notch signaling highlighted a role for the second pathway in protecting cells against senescence in GNAQ Q209L UM cells treated with the MEK inhibitor., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular tumor in adults. Nearly half of UM patients develop metastatic disease and often succumb within months because effective therapy is lacking. A novel therapeutic approach has been suggested by the discovery that UM cell lines driven by mutant constitutively active Gq or G11 can be targeted by FR900359 (FR) or YM-254890, which are bioavailable, selective inhibitors of the Gq/11/14 subfamily of heterotrimeric G proteins. Here, we have addressed the therapeutic potential of FR for UM. We found that FR inhibited all oncogenic Gq/11 mutants reported in UM. FR arrested growth of all Gq/11-driven UM cell lines tested, but induced apoptosis only in a few. Similarly, FR inhibited growth of, but did not efficiently kill, UM tumor cells from biopsies of primary or metastatic tumors. FR evoked melanocytic redifferentiation of UM tumor cells with low (class 1), but not high (class 2), metastatic potential. FR administered systemically below its LD 50 strongly inhibited growth of PDX-derived class 1 and class 2 UM tumors in mouse xenograft models and reduced blood pressure transiently. FR did not regress xenografted UM tumors or significantly affect heart rate, liver function, hematopoiesis, or behavior. These results indicated the existence of a therapeutic window in which FR can be explored for treating UM and potentially other diseases caused by constitutively active Gq/11., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest K. J. B. and M. D. O. are listed as coinventors on a provisional patent application on Targeted Pharmacological Therapeutics In Uveal Melanoma that is owned by Washington University in St. Louis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Mutational activation of GNAQ or GNA11 ( GNAQ/11 ), detected in >90% of uveal melanomas, leads to constitutive activation of oncogenic pathways, including MAPK and YAP. To date, chemo- or pathway-targeted therapies, either alone or in combination, have proven ineffective in the treatment of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma., Experimental Design: We tested the efficacy of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, in combination with MAPK pathway inhibition in GNAQ/11 -mutated cells in vitro and in vivo and identified mechanisms of MEK1/2 inhibitor plus chloroquine-induced cytotoxicity., Results: Inhibition of GNAQ/11-mediated activation of MAPK signaling resulted in the induction of autophagy. Combined inhibition of Gα and autophagy or lysosome function resulted in enhanced cell death. Moreover, the combination of MEK1/2 inhibition, using trametinib, with the lysosome inhibitor, chloroquine, also increased cytotoxicity. Treatment of mice bearing GNAQ/11-driven melanomas with trametinib plus hydroxychloroquine resulted in inhibition of tumor growth and significantly prolonged survival. Interestingly, lysosomal- and autophagy-specific inhibition with bafilomycin A1 was not sufficient to promote cytotoxicity in combination with trametinib. However, the addition of YAP inhibition with trametinib plus bafilomycin A1 resulted in cell death at comparable levels to trametinib plus chloroquine (T/CQ) treatment. Furthermore, T/CQ-treated cells displayed decreased YAP nuclear localization and decreased YAP transcriptional activity. Expression of a constitutively active YAP 5SA mutant conferred resistance to T/CQ-induced cell death., Conclusions: These results suggest that YAP, MEK1/2, and lysosome function are necessary and critical targets for the therapy of GNAQ/11-driven melanoma, and identify trametinib plus hydroxychloroquine as a potential treatment strategy for metastatic uveal melanoma., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: GNAQ and GNA11 mutant nonuveal melanoma represent a poorly characterized rare subgroup of melanoma with a gene mutation profile similar to uveal melanoma., Objectives: To characterize these tumours in terms of clinical behaviour and genetic characteristics., Methods: Patients with nonuveal GNAQ/11 mutated melanoma were identified from the prospective multicentre tumour tissue registry ADOREG, Tissue Registry in Melanoma (TRIM) and additional cooperating skin cancer centres. Extensive data on patient, tumour and treatment characteristics were collected retrospectively. Targeted sequencing was used to determine tumour mutational burden. Immunohistochemistry staining was performed for programmed death-ligand 1 and BRCA1-associated protein (BAP)1. Existing whole-exome cutaneous and uveal melanoma data were analysed for mutation type and burden., Results: We identified 18 patients with metastatic GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanoma. Tumours had a lower tumour mutational burden and fewer ultraviolet signature mutations than cutaneous melanomas. In addition to GNAQ and GNA11 mutations (nine each), six splicing factor 3b subunit 1 (SF3B1), three eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A X-linked (EIF1AX) and four BAP1 mutations were detected. In contrast to uveal melanoma, GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas frequently metastasized lymphatically and concurrent EIF1AX, SF3B1 and BAP1 mutations showed no apparent association with patient prognosis. Objective response to immunotherapy was poor with only one partial response observed in 10 treated patients (10%)., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas are a subtype of melanoma that is both clinically and genetically distinct from cutaneous and uveal melanoma. As they respond poorly to available treatment regimens, novel effective therapeutic approaches for affected patients are urgently needed. What is already known about this topic? The rare occurrence of GNAQ/11 mutations in nonuveal melanoma has been documented. GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas also harbour genetic alterations in EIF1AX, SF3B1 and BAP1 that are of prognostic relevance in uveal melanoma. What does this study add? GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas show metastatic spread reminiscent of cutaneous melanoma, but not uveal melanoma. GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas have a low tumour mutational burden that is higher than uveal melanoma, but lower than cutaneous melanoma. What is the translational message? Primary GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas are a subtype of melanoma that is clinically and genetically distinct from both cutaneous and uveal melanoma. As metastatic GNAQ/11 mutant nonuveal melanomas respond poorly to available systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibition, novel therapeutic approaches for these tumours are urgently needed. Linked Comment: Rafei-Shamsabadi. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:806-807., (© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

Uveal melanoma is the most common form of eye cancer and has a poor prognosis. Although the primary tumor in most cases is treated effectively by local surgery or radiotherapy, over 50 % of patients develop systemic metastasis, especially in the liver. In contrast to cutaneous melanoma, there is no standard-of-care treatment for metastasized uveal melanoma. Recently, oncogenic driver mutations in GNAQ or GNA11 were identified in about 85 % of uveal melanomas, which lead to constitutively active signaling in the Gα q/11 pathway and its downstream effectors. Direct targeting of deregulated Gα q/11 signaling might therefore be a therapeutic option for patients with uveal melanoma. In our study we identified the cyclic depsipeptide FR-900359, which is isolated from the evergreen plant Ardisia crenata as an effective inhibitor of constitutively active Gα q/11 proteins and their downstream targets. Although our data are preliminary, they might contribute to a future treatment option for patients with metastasized uveal melanoma., (© 2020 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

We report a case of an uveal melanoma patient with GNAQ p.Gly48Leu who responded to MEK inhibition. At the time of the molecular analysis, the pathogenicity of the mutation was unknown. A tridimensional structural analysis showed that Gα q can adopt active and inactive conformations that lead to substantial changes, involving three important switch regions. Our molecular modelling study predicted that GNAQ p.Gly48Leu introduces new favorable interactions in its active conformation, whereas little or no impact is expected in its inactive form. This strongly suggests that GNAQ p.Gly48Leu is a possible tumor-activating driver mutation, consequently triggering the MEK pathway. In addition, we also found an FGFR4 p.Cys172Gly mutation, which was predicted by molecular modelling analysis to lead to a gain of function by impacting the Ig-like domain 2 folding, which is involved in FGF binding and increases the stability of the homodimer. Based on these analyses, the patient received the MEK inhibitor trametinib with a lasting clinical benefit. This work highlights the importance of molecular modelling for personalized oncology.

Objective: To quantitatively detect GNAQ /11 mutations in uveal melanoma (UM) by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)., Methods: Formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples were taken from 78 UM patients with enucleation in West China Hospital between 2009 and 2015. None of the patients received radiotherapy or chemotherapy before enucleation. A retrospective study was conducted to detect GNAQ /11 mutation in UM by ddPCR. To compare the consistency of the results of the two detection methods, DNA sequencing was performed on the target gene by Sanger sequencing. 78 patients with UM were studied retrospectively. GNAQ /11 mutations in uveal melanoma was detected by ddPCR. The consistency of the results of the two detection methods was analyzed., Results: GNAQ /11 mutations frequency was 91.9%. The consistency test between Sanger sequencing and ddPCR of GNAQ /11 mutations in 74 patients with UM was conducted. Kappa coefficient=0.436, P =0.001. The error rate of Sanger sequencing results was significantly higher in the heterogeneous group than in the homogeneous group (12/37 vs. 3/16, P =0.53), but the difference was not statistically significant., Conclusion: The results of ddPCR and Sanger sequencing showed good consistency, and the mutation ratio of GNAQ /11 in UM was significantly different. GNAQ /11 mutation frequency in UM patients detected by ddPCR was close to the reported frequency. It is more recommended to use ddPCR with high sensitivity to detect gene mutations in samples of tumor tissue DNA derived from FFPE. Sanger sequencing is prone to false negative results., (Copyright© by Editorial Board of Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Science Edition).)

Background: The purpose of this study is to determine the mutation frequencies of key driver genes in uveal melanoma (UM) in Chinese patients and to detect associations between metastasis and the mutation of these genes., Method: A total of 85 patients with UM were enrolled in this study, including 18 patients with metastasis and 67 without metastasis. Sanger sequencing covering the mutational hotspot regions of the G protein subunit alpha Q (GNAQ), GNA11, splicing factor 3B subunit 1 (SF3B1), X-linked eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A (EIF1AX), phospholipase C beta 4 (PLCB4) and cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 2 (CYSLTR2) genes was used to analyse the mutations in Chinese patients., Results: The frequencies of GNAQ and GNA11 mutations in UM were 45% (38/85) and 35% (30/85) respectively. The frequencies of SF3B1 and EIF1AX mutations were 37% (31/85) and 9% (8/85) respectively. Only 2 mutations were detected in exon 4 of GNAQ, and no mutations were detected in exon 4 of GNA11. A novel mutation, c.627G>T (Q209H) in GNA11 was found. The detected mutations affecting SF3B1 were c.1873C>T (R625C), c.1874G>A (R625H) and c.1874G>T (R625L). The association between the mutations in SF3B1 and low risk of metastasis was statistically significant (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.035-0.819). The mutations affecting EIF1AX were -23G>A (5'-UTR), c.5C>G (P2R), c.23G>A (G8Q), c.25G>C (G9A) and c.38&#95;39GC>CT (R13P). No mutations were found in the PLCB4 and CYSLTR2 genes. Unfortunately, information on BRCA1-associated protein 1 could not be obtained., Conclusions: These data indicate that mutations in the PLCB4 and CYSLTR2 genes are rare in Chinese UM patients. The mutations in GNAQ, GNA11 and EIF1AX were not associated with metastasis, whereas SF3B1 mutations were correlated with low risk of metastasis and demonstrated a protective effect in UM patients in China., (© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Importance: There has been speculation on the pathogenesis of unilateral multifocal uveal melanoma, but there remains no convincing explanation. Genetic analysis suggests that unilateral multifocal uveal melanoma may represent intraocular metastasis with increased risk of systemic metastasis., Objective: To evaluate the pathogenesis of unilateral multifocal uveal melanoma., Design, Setting, and Participants: This clinical case series was conducted in tertiary academic ocular oncology referral centers and included patients with unilateral multifocal uveal melanoma., Main Outcomes and Measures: Gene expression and mutation profiling of tumor samples., Results: Four patients (all male; age range, 54-77 years) who were diagnosed with uveal melanoma were treated with plaque brachytherapy, and subsequently developed a second discrete uveal melanoma in the same eye were included. None demonstrated ocular or oculodermal melanocytosis. All 8 tumors available for analysis exhibited class 2 gene expression profiles. In all 4 cases, the initial and subsequent tumors were available for targeted DNA sequencing and identical driver mutations were present in both tumors. Data were collected from September 2015 to August 2018., Conclusions and Relevance: Unilateral multifocal uveal melanoma in the absence of ocular melanocytosis appears to occur preferentially in tumors with the class 2 gene expression profile and a BRCA1-associated protein 1 gene (BAP1) mutation. The presence of identical BAP1 mutations in multiple tumors in the same eye in the absence of a germline BAP1 mutation suggests intraocular metastasis rather than independent primary tumors. These findings indicate that the first site of metastasis can be within the eye itself and suggest that patients with unilateral multifocal uveal melanoma may be at increased risk of systemic metastasis.

Malignant melanoma of the uvea is the most common primary malignant tumor in the eye. We aimed to analyze GNAQ and GNA11 mutations in uveal melanomas using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material and correlate the results with clinicopathological parameters. Tumor tissue was microdissected followed by amplification of GNAQ exon 4 and 5, GNA11 exon 4 and 5, and finally analyzed by Sanger sequencing. A total of 64.4 GNA11/GNAQ mutations, including ten yet unreported, were found. Two cases showed multiple mutations. Overall survival was significantly shorter in the uveal melanoma cohort with GNAQ exon 5 mutation. In concordance with previous studies, high frequencies of mutations in GNAQ or GNA11 were detected. Interestingly, in about 20% of UM, not yet reported mutations in GNAQ or GNA11 were seen. Rarely, uveal melanoma may harbor double mutations in GNAQ and/or GNA11. Recent data imply, that implementation of GNAQ/GNA11 mutation analysis in routine diagnostic procedures might be helpful for future therapeutic decisions.

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular tumor in adults. It can arise from melanocytes in the anterior (iris) or posterior uveal tract (choroid and ciliary body). Uveal melanoma has a particular molecular pathogenesis, being characterized by specific chromosome alterations and gene mutations (e.g., GNAQ/GNA11; BAP1), which are considered promising targets for molecular therapy. Primary treatment of uveal melanoma includes radiotherapy (brachytherapy and charged-particle therapy), phototherapy (photocoagulation, transpupillary thermal therapy, and photodynamic therapy) and surgery (local resection, enucleation and exenteration). Approximately half of patients with uveal melanoma will, however, develop metastasis, especially in the liver. The treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma includes systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy. Liver-directed therapies, such as resection, chemoembolization, immunoembolization, radioembolization, isolated hepatic perfusion and percutaneous hepatic perfusion, are also available to treat metastatic uveal melanoma. Several clinical trials are being developed to study new therapeutic options to treat uveal melanoma, mainly for those with identified liver metastases. The present work discusses the physiopathology and new in situ-specific therapies for the treatment of uveal melanoma.

Purpose: The activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway has been suggested as the major downstream target when GNAQ and GNA11 (GNAQ/11) are mutated in uveal melanoma (UM). However, clinical trials with single agent MEK inhibitor showed no clinical significance in altering the overall outcome of the disease in UM; therefore, we investigated the correlation between naturally occurring mutations in GNAQ/11 and activation of MAPK pathway in vivo in primary UM., Methods: Screening for activating mutations in codons 183 and 209 of GNAQ/11 was carried out by sequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) in a cohort of 42 primary UM. Activation of the MAPK pathway and other potential downstream signals was assessed by immunohistochemistry and/or Western blot analysis. Potential downstream signaling of mutant and wild type GNAQ/11 was studied by transient transfection assay in nonmutant cell lines., Results: Somatic mutations in GNAQ/11 were observed in 35/42 (83.3%) of primary UM. Tumors with GNAQ/11 mutations showed variations in the activation of ERK1/2 with significant tumor heterogeneity. Weak and undetectable ERK1/2 activation was observed in 4/35 (11.4%) and 8/35 (22.9%) of the GNAQ/11 mutant UM, respectively. Tumor heterogeneity of GNAQ/11 mutations was also observed in a subset of tumors., Conclusions: Our results indicate that there is marked variation in MAPK activation in UM with GNAQ/11 mutations. Thus, GNAQ/11 mutational status is not a sufficient biomarker to adequately predict UM patient responses to single-agent selective MEK inhibitor therapy.

Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular tumor in adults and often metastasizes to the liver, leaving patients with few options. Recurrent activating mutations in the G proteins, Gα q and Gα 11 , are observed in approximately 93% of all uveal melanomas. Although therapeutic intervention of downstream Gα q/11 targets has been unsuccessful in treating uveal melanoma, we have found that the Gα q/11 inhibitor, FR900359 (FR), effectively inhibits oncogenic Gα q/11 signaling in uveal melanoma cells expressing either mutant Gα q or Gα 11 . Inhibition of oncogenic Gα q/11 by FR results in cell-cycle arrest and induction of apoptosis. Furthermore, colony formation is prevented by FR treatment of uveal melanoma cells in 3D-cell culture, providing promise for future in vivo studies. This suggests direct inhibition of activating Gα q/11 mutants may be a potential means of treating uveal melanoma. IMPLICATIONS: Oncogenic Gα q/11 inhibition by FR900359 may be a potential treatment option for those with uveal melanoma., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a severe human malignancy with a high mortality rate, as well as high metastasis and recurrence potential. The active mutation of G protein subunit alpha q (GNAQ) or G protein subunit alpha 11 (GNA11) is a major trigger for UM. Oncolytic adenovirus H101 (H101) is the first oncolytic virus approved for clinical applications in cancer therapy by the China Food and Drug Administration. We investigated whether combining H101 with the downregulation of GNAQ expression would act synergistically in UM therapy., Methods: Three UM cell lines OMM2.3 and 92.1, harboring GNAQ mutation, and OCM1, harboring B-Raf proto-oncogene mutation, were chosen for our research. The cellular toxicity of adenoviral infection and the cell growth rate were measured with a Cell Counting Kit-8. Western blot analysis was used to detect GNAQ, p-MEK1/2, YAP, and p-YAP expression. The apoptosis and cell-cycle distribution of cells were evaluated with annexin-V and propidium iodide staining., Results: Our results revealed that OMM2.3 and 92.1 cells were more sensitive to H101 infection than OCM1 cells. GNAQ expression was markedly reduced by small interfering RNA, siGNAQ. Combined treatment of siGNAQ and H101 inhibited the proliferation and activated the apoptosis of OMM2.3 and 92.1 cells by blocking the phosphorylation of MEK1/2 and increasing the phosphorylation of YAP., Conclusions: In summary, a therapy combining H101 and siGNAQ is feasible, with potential utility as a novel targeted molecular therapy for UM, especially those carrying a GNAQ mutation., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Somatic gain-of-function mutations of GNAQ and GNA11 , which encode α subunits of heterotrimeric Gα q/11 proteins, occur in about 85% of cases of uveal melanoma (UM), the most common cancer of the adult eye. Molecular therapies to directly target these oncoproteins are lacking, and current treatment options rely on radiation, surgery, or inhibition of effector molecules downstream of these G proteins. A hallmark feature of oncogenic Gα q/11 proteins is their reduced intrinsic rate of hydrolysis of guanosine triphosphate (GTP), which results in their accumulation in the GTP-bound, active state. Here, we report that the cyclic depsipeptide FR900359 (FR) directly interacted with GTPase-deficient Gα q/11 proteins and preferentially inhibited mitogenic ERK signaling rather than canonical phospholipase Cβ (PLCβ) signaling driven by these oncogenes. Thereby, FR suppressed the proliferation of melanoma cells in culture and inhibited the growth of Gα q -driven UM mouse xenografts in vivo. In contrast, FR did not affect tumor growth when xenografts carried mutated B-Raf V600E as the oncogenic driver. Because FR enabled suppression of malignant traits in cancer cells that are driven by activating mutations at codon 209 in Gα q/11 proteins, we envision that similar approaches could be taken to blunt the signaling of non-Gα q/11 G proteins., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.)