Search

Background: Phenylephrine given during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery often induces a decrease in heart rate which may decrease cardiac output. Anticholinergic drugs may be given to attenuate this effect but may also cause more labile blood pressure. This study evaluated the effects of glycopyrrolate pre-treatment on non-invasively measured cardiac output and accuracy of blood pressure control., Methods: At induction of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery, 104 patients randomly received intravenous glycopyrrolate 4μg/kg or saline placebo. Systolic blood pressure, measured at 1-min intervals, was maintained near baseline using closed-loop feedback computer-controlled phenylephrine infusion with crystalloid cohydration. Cardiac output and stroke volume were measured using suprasternal Doppler ultrasonography at baseline and 5-min intervals for 20min. Blood pressure control was assessed using performance error calculations., Results: Eleven patients were excluded. Patients who received glycopyrrolate (n=45) had greater cardiac output over time (P<0.001), greater heart rate over time (P<0.001), similar stroke volume over time (P=0.95), and lower median phenylephrine infusion rate (P=0.006) compared with control (n=48). There was no difference in the incidence of hypotension between groups. Analysis of blood pressure control showed greater positive bias, greater inaccuracy and greater wobble in the glycopyrrolate group (all P<0.05). Neonatal outcome was similar between groups., Conclusions: Glycopyrrolate 4μg/kg given at the start of a phenylephrine infusion increased heart rate and cardiac output but also decreased accuracy of blood pressure control, increased the incidence of hypertension and caused an increased incidence of dry mouth postoperatively compared with control., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Closed-loop feedback computer-controlled infusion has not been described for administering phenylephrine to maintain arterial pressure (AP) during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. We aimed to compare AP control using this automated system with a previously described manual infusion system., Methods: We randomly allocated 222 healthy subjects having spinal anaesthesia for scheduled caesarean delivery to have systolic AP maintained near baseline with phenylephrine (100 µg ml(-1)) by computer-controlled infusion utilizing a proportional algorithm or manual-controlled infusion utilizing an on-off algorithm. AP control was assessed by comparing the proportion of systolic AP measurements within ±20% of baseline and by performance error (PE) calculations., Results: A total of 212 subjects finished the study. In the computer-control group, 97% of systolic AP recordings fell within ±20% of baseline compared with 95% in the manual-control group (P=0.0004). For computer-control compared with manual-control, wobble was smaller [median 3.5 (inter-quartile range 2.5-4.8)% vs 4.2 (3.3-5.9)%, P=0.003], but there was no difference in the median PE [2.9 (0.3-4.7)% vs 1.9 (0-4.2)%], median absolute PE [4.7 (3.5-5.6)% vs 4.7 (3.8-6.7)%], or divergence [-0.01 (-0.03-0)% vs -0.06 (-0.26-0.08)%]. Fewer interventions per subject for controlling AP were required in the computer-control group [2 (2-2) vs 10 (8-13), P<0.001]. There were no differences in measured clinical outcomes., Conclusions: Within the constraints of the studied algorithms, closed-loop feedback computer-controlled phenylephrine infusion provided better AP control with fewer interventions required compared with manual-controlled infusion.

Summary: In a randomised, double-blinded study, we compared boluses of phenylephrine 100 microg with ephedrine 10 mg for treating hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg) in 204 patients having non-elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Umbilical arterial (UA) and venous (UV) pH and base excess were similar between groups. In the ephedrine group, UA lactate concentration was higher (median 2.6 [interquartile range 2.3-3.3] vs 2.4 [1.9-3.0] mmolxl(-1), p = 0.002) and UV lactate concentration was higher (2.5 [2.2-3.2] vs 2.3 [1.9-2.8] mmolxl(-1), p = 0.016) and more patients had nausea or vomiting (12.7% vs 3.9%, p = 0.02). Clinical neonatal outcome was similar. Of the protocol-compliant patients (n = 148), UA Po(2) and UV Po(2) were lower in the phenylephrine group although oxygen content was similar. We conclude that phenylephrine and ephedrine are both suitable vasopressors for use in non-elective Caesarean sections.

We describe the novel use of a closed-loop feedback computer-controlled infusion of phenylephrine for maintaining blood pressure in 53 patients having spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. A simple on-off algorithm was used that activated an intravenous phenylephrine infusion at 100 microg.min(-1) when systolic blood pressure was less than or equal to baseline and stopped the infusion when systolic blood pressure exceeded baseline. Up to uterine incision, 94.6% of all systolic blood pressure measurements were within the range (baseline +/- 20%). Seven patients (13.2%) had one or more episodes of hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 80% of baseline) and 23 patients (37.7%) had one or more episodes of hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 120% of baseline). No patient had nausea or vomiting and in no case was umbilical arterial blood pH < 7.2. Calculated system performance parameters were comparable with those of previously published closed-loop systems and provide a reference for the potential development and comparison of more advanced algorithms.

Background: During spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section, the optimal phenylephrine regimen and the optimal blood pressure (BP) to which it should be titrated are undetermined. The ideal regimen would balance efficacy for maintaining uteroplacental perfusion pressure against potential for uteroplacental vasoconstriction, both of which may affect fetal acid-base status. We compared phenylephrine infusion regimens based on three different BP thresholds., Methods: After intrathecal injection, we infused phenylephrine 100 microg min(-1) for 2 min. Then, until delivery, we infused phenylephrine whenever systolic BP (SBP), measured every 1 min, was below a randomly assigned percentage of baseline: 100% (Group 100, n=25), 90% (Group 90, n=25) or 80% (Group 80, n=24). We compared umbilical blood gases, Apgar scores and maternal haemodynamics and symptoms., Results: Patients in Group 100 had fewer episodes [median 0 (range 0-8)] of hypotension (SBP <80% baseline) compared with Group 80 [5 (0-18)] and Group 90 [2 (0-7)] (P<0.001 in each instance). Total dose of phenylephrine was greater in Group 100 [median 1520 microg (interquartile range 1250-2130 microg)] compared with Group 90 [1070 (890-1360) microg] and Group 80 [790 (590-950) microg]. Umbilical arterial pH was greater in Group 100 [mean 7.32 (95% confidence interval 7.31-7.34)] than in Group 80 [7.30 (7.28-7.31)] (P=0.034). No patient had umbilical arterial pH <7.2. In Group 100, 1/24 (4%) patients had nausea or vomiting compared with 4/25 (16%) in Group 90 and 10/25 (40%) in Group 80 (P=0.006)., Conclusions: For optimal management, phenylephrine should be titrated to maintain maternal BP at near-baseline values.

We randomly allocated women having elective cesarean delivery to receive either no bolus (Control Group, n = 31) or 20 mL/kg lactated Ringer's solution (Bolus Group, n = 35) IV before spinal anesthesia. An infusion of metaraminol started at 0.25 mg/min was titrated to maintain systolic arterial blood pressure in the target range 90%-100% of baseline. The total dose of metaraminol required up to the time of uterine incision was similar between the Control Group and the Bolus Group (3.62 +/- 1.20 vs 3.27 +/- 1.39 mg, P = 0.3). However, the Control Group required more metaraminol in the first 5 min (1.29 +/- 0.60 vs 0.96 +/- 0.58 mg, P = 0.025) and a faster maximum infusion rate (0.45 +/- 0.20 vs 0.32 +/- 0.13 mg/min, P = 0.002) compared with the Bolus Group. There was no difference between groups in regards to changes in systolic arterial blood pressure or heart rate over time, or maternal or neonatal outcome. We conclude that when metaraminol is used to maintain arterial pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, crystalloid bolus is not essential provided that sufficient vasopressor is given in the immediate postspinal period.

Background: Although ephedrine is usually recommended as the first-line vasopressor in obstetrics, its superiority over other vasopressors has not been proven in humans., Methods: In a double-blind study, the authors randomized women having elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia to receive an intravenous infusion of ephedrine, starting at 5 mg/min (n = 25), or metaraminol, starting at 0.25 mg/min (n = 25), titrated to maintain systolic arterial pressure in the target range 90-100% of baseline. Umbilical cord gases, maternal hemodynamics, uterine artery puLsatility index, and Apgar scores were compared., Results: Systolic arterial pressure was maintained more closely in the target range in the metaraminol group compared with the ephedrine group. In the metaraminol group, umbilical arterial pH was greater (median and interquartile range, 7.31 and 7.31-7.33 vs. 7.24 and 7.14-7.29; P < 0.0001), and umbilical venous pH was greater (7.36 and 7.35-7.38 vs. 7.33 and 7.26-7.34; P < 0.0001) compared with the ephedrine group. No patient in the metaraminol group had umbilical arterial pH less than 7.2, compared with nine patients (39%) in the ephedrine group (P = 0.0005). Apgar scores were similar between groups. Changes in uterine artery pulsatility index were similar between groups., Conclusions: When used by infusion to maintain arterial pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section, metaraminol was associated with less neonatal acidosis and more closely controlled titration of arterial pressure compared with ephedrine.

Unlabelled: We performed a randomized, double-blinded dose-finding study of IV ephedrine for prophylaxis for hypotension in 80 women who received an IV crystalloid preload and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. One minute after the intrathecal injection, patients were given saline control or ephedrine 10, 20, or 30 mg IV for 30 s. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) in the first 12 min after the spinal injection was greater in the 30-mg group compared with other groups (P < 0.05). Hypotension occurred in 7 patients (35%) in the 30-mg group compared with 19 (95%), 17 (85%), and 16 (80%) patients in the control and 10- and 20-mg groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Maximum decrease in SAP was smaller in the 30-mg group (mean lowest SAP 87% of baseline, range 58%-105%) compared with other groups (P < 0.01). Reactive hypertension occurred in 9 patients (45%) in the 30-mg group (mean highest SAP 120% of baseline, range 104%-143%) compared with 2 (10%), 1 (5%), and 5 (25%) patients in the other groups (P = 0.009). Heart rate changes, total ephedrine requirement, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and neonatal outcome were similar among groups. The proportion of patients with umbilical arterial pH < 7.2 was 10.5%, 25%, 42%, and 22% in the control, 10-, 20-, and 30-mg groups, respectively (P = 0. 12). We conclude that the smallest effective dose of ephedrine to reduce the incidence of hypotension was 30 mg. However, this dose did not completely eliminate hypotension, nausea and vomiting, and fetal acidosis, and it caused reactive hypertension in some patients., Implications: We investigated different doses of IV ephedrine as prophylaxis for hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery and found that the smallest effective dose was 30 mg. However, this dose did not completely eliminate hypotension, caused reactive hypertension in some patients, and did not improve neonatal outcome.

We have investigated the addition of adrenaline to epidural pethidine for postoperative analgesia in 40 patients after Caesarean section. In a randomised, double-blind study, patients received pethidine 25 mg with adrenaline 50 micrograms (adrenaline group, n = 20) or pethidine 25 mg without adrenaline (plain group, n = 18) epidurally at the first request for postoperative analgesia. The median duration of analgesia was longer in the adrenaline group (196 min; IQR 123-286) compared with the plain group (96 min; IQR 43-113; p = 0.002) and plasma concentrations of pethidine in the first 30 min after injection were lower in the adrenaline group (p = 0.003). Visual analogue scale pain scores in the first 30 min after injection and onset of analgesia, defined by the time for pain scores to decrease by 50%, were similar between groups. Addition of adrenaline to epidural pethidine has advantages for analgesia after Caesarean section.