Search

Simple Summary: Hearing loss (HL) can be a side effect of paediatric cancer treatment and can be caused by chemotherapy but also local therapies such as radiotherapy and/or surgery of the head and neck region. In this study, the frequency and patterns of HL were assessed in survivors of head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS). Our secondary aim was to look into the dose–effect relationship between radiotherapy dose on the cochlea and the presence of HL. Forty-nine survivors of HNRMS were included in this study, forty-two of them underwent audiological evaluation. HL was found in up to 19% of the survivors. Four survivors had low frequencies HL with normal hearing or milder HL in the higher frequencies. In our series, HL (≥Muenster 2b) was significantly associated with the maximum cochlear irradiation dose (p = 0.047). More research is needed on HL patterns in HNRMS survivors and on the radiotherapy dose–effect relationship. Purpose: The frequency and patterns of HL in a HNRMS survivor cohort were investigated. A dose–effect relationship between the dose to the cochlea and HL was explored. Methods: Dutch survivors treated for HNRMS between 1993 and 2017 with no relapse and at least two years after the end of treatment were eligible for inclusion. The survivors were evaluated for HL with pure-tone audiometry. HL was graded according to the Muenster, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 and International Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) classification. We defined deleterious HL as Muenster ≥ 2b, CTCAE ≥ 2, and SIOP ≥ 2. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to search for the dose–effect relationship between the irradiation dose to the cochlea and the occurrence of HL. Results: Forty-two HNRMS survivors underwent pure-tone audiometry. The Muenster, CTCAE and SIOP classification showed that 19.0% (n = 8), 14.2% (n = 6) and 11.9% (n = 5) of survivors suffered from HL, respectively. A low-frequency HL pattern with normal hearing or milder hearing loss in the higher frequencies was seen in four survivors. The maximum cochlear irradiation dose was significantly associated with HL (≥Muenster 2b) (p = 0.047). In our series, HL (≥Muenster 2b) was especially observed when the maximum dose to the cochlea exceeded 19 Gy. Conclusion: HL occurred in up to 19% of survivors of HNRMS. More research is needed on HL patterns in HNRMS survivors and on radiotherapy dose–effect relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Platinum-containing chemotherapeutics are efficacious for a variety of pediatric malignancies, nevertheless these drugs can induce ototoxicity. However, ototoxicity data on large cohorts of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) who received platinum agents, but not cranial irradiation are scarce. Therefore, we have studied the frequency and determinants of ototoxicity in a cross-sectional multicenter CCS cohort, including the role of co-medication since it has been suggested that these play a role in ototoxicity. We have collected treatment data and audiograms from the medical records of CCS treated in the seven pediatric oncology centres in The Netherlands. Ototoxicity was defined as Münster grade ≥2b (>20 dB at ≥4–8 kHz). Four-hundred-fifty-one CCS who received platinum agents, but not cranial irradiation (median age at diagnosis: 4.9 years, range: 0.01–19 years) were included. The overall frequency of ototoxicity was 42%. Ototoxicity was observed in 45% of the cisplatin-treated CCS, in 17% of the carboplatin-treated CCS and in 75% of the CCS that had received both agents. Multivariate analysis showed that younger age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]: 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5–0.6 per 5 years increase); higher total cumulative dose cisplatin (OR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.2–1.5 per 100 mg/m 2 increase); and co-treatment with furosemide (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.4–3.9) were associated with ototoxicity. We conclude that treatment with (higher total cumulative dose of) cisplatin, young age and furosemide co-medication independently are associated with an increased risk of ototoxicity in CCS. Future prospective studies are necessary to confirm the additive risk of co-medication on the development of ototoxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Ultraviolet radiation exposure is the most important exogenous risk factor for cutaneous malignancies. It is possible that phototoxic drugs promote the development of cutaneous melanoma (CM) by intensifying the effect of ultraviolet light on the skin. We investigated the association between the use of common systemic phototoxic drugs and development of CM. Methods: This study was a case-control study in a Dutch population-based cohort. The drug dispensing data was obtained from PHARMO, a Dutch drug dispensing and hospital admissions registry, and linked to PALGA, the nationwide pathology network of the Netherlands. The cases were patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed primary CM between 1991 and 2004. Controls were sampled from the PHARMO population. Exposure to systemic phototoxic drugs was measured and included antimicrobial agents, diuretics, antipsychotic drugs, antidiabetic drugs, cardiac drugs, antimalarials and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). A multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to study the association between exposure to phototoxic drugs and CM. Results: The study population included 1,318 cases and 6,786 controls. Any phototoxic drug during the study period was dispensed for 46 % of the cases and 43 % of the controls ( p = 0.012). The use of quinolones [odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.76] and propionic acid derivative NSAIDs (OR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.14-1.54) had a positive association with CM. Conclusions: Our study shows that the use of phototoxic drugs is associated with an increased risk of developing CM. Even a short-term use of phototoxic quinolones and propionic acid derivative NSAIDs may increase the risk for CM. Patient education to promote sun-protective behaviour is essential to avoid immediate adverse effects and possible long-term effects of phototoxic drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study evaluated ototoxicity in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients treated in the CONDOR study with docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by conventional radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 on days 1, 22, and 43 (cis100+RT) versus accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin weekly 40 mg/m 2 (cis40+ART)., Methods: Sixty-two patients were treated in this study. Audiometry was performed at baseline, during TPF, before start of chemoradiotherapy, and 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after treatment., Results: A complete dataset of audiometric data was available of 12 patients treated with high-dose cisplatin and of 11 patients treated with intermediate-dose cisplatin. Patients in the high-dose group showed significant more hearing loss than in the intermediate group at 4 kHz ([z = 1.98; P = .04] and 8 kHz [z = 2.07; P < .03]). Interindividual variation was high in both groups., Conclusion: After induction TPF, more ototoxicity was observed in chemoradiotherapy with cis100+RT than after chemoradiotherapy with cis40+ART., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine whether concomitant chemoradiation (CCRT)-induced hearing loss is progressive over time or not., Study Design: Long-term (LT) follow-up study., Methods: Between 1999 and 2004, 158 patients with head and neck cancer were treated with intravenous (IV) CCRT (n = 80) or intraarterial CCRT (n = 78). Audiometry was performed before, short-term (ST), and LT posttreatment. Differences in hearing were assessed with a multivariable linear regression analysis, incorporating the effect of aging., Results: Long-term audiometry (median 4.5 years) was available in 67 patients (42%). At ST follow-up, a deterioration of 21.6 decibel was seen compared to baseline at pure-tone averages (PTA) 8-10-12.5 kHz. At LT follow-up, this deterioration further increased with 5 decibel (P = 0.005). Only in CCRT-IV patients was a significant progressive treatment-induced hearing loss seen, at PTA 8-10-12.5 kHz (P = 0.005), PTA 1-2-4 kHz air conduction (P = 0.014), and PTA 0.5-1-2 kHz bone conduction (P = 0.045)., Conclusion: CCRT-induced hearing impairment was progressive over time, especially in higher frequencies and only in CCRT-IV patients, with a modest deterioration of 5 decibel 4.5 years post-treatment., Level of Evidence: 4., (© 2014 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)