Search

Objective: To describe the radiological features of patients with headache as a presenting symptom of neurosarcoidosis. Background: Neurologic complications occur in approximately 5%–10% of patients with sarcoidosis, and approximately 50% of these patients have neurologic deficits at the time sarcoidosis is first diagnosed. A wide spectrum of central and peripheral nervous system clinical manifestations may be observed, including cranial nerve palsies, sensory and/or motor deficits, and headache. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results in patients with neurosarcoidosis may include abnormal contrast enhancement, structural masses, and demyelinating lesions. Methods: This single‐center retrospective cohort study assessed patients who were diagnosed with neurosarcoidosis in an urban tertiary care center between 1995 and 2016. We included patients who had MRI results at the time of diagnosis. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of headache as a presenting symptom. The MRI result of meningeal contrast enhancement was reviewed. Results: Of the 110 patients analyzed, 30 (27.3%) had an initial presenting symptom of headache while 80 (72.7%) did not. Patients with headache had a higher proportion of meningeal contrast enhancement on MRI (66.7% [20/30] vs. 25.0% [20/80]; p < 0.001) and leptomeningeal involvement (53.3% [16/30] vs. 7.5% [6/80], p < 0.001) compared to patients with no headache. However, those with headache had a lower proportion of spinal cord localization (13.8% [4/29] vs. 34.2% [26/76], p = 0.038) and intraparenchymal central nervous system involvement (16.7% [5/30] vs. 51.3% [41/80], p = 0.001) compared to patients with no headache. Conclusion: Patients with neurosarcoidosis who presented with headache as an initial symptom had a higher proportion of meningeal contrast enhancement seen by MRI than patients who presented with other neurological symptoms. This suggests a clinico‐radiologic link between headache and meningeal disruption in patients with neurosarcoidosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well‐established treatment option for chronic pain. Pain over the implantable pulse generator, or pocket pain, is an incompletely understood risk of SCS implantation which may limit the efficacy of treatment and patient quality of life. The goal of this narrative review is to analyze the literature to gain a more thorough understanding of the incidence and risk factors for the development of pocket pain to help guide treatment options and minimize its occurrence in the future. Methods: A literature review was conducted investigating the development of pocket pain in patients with SCS for the management of a variety of pain conditions. Results: In total, 305 articles were included in the original database search and 50 met the criteria for inclusion. The highest level of evidence for papers that specifically investigated pocket pain was level III. Four retrospective, observational analyses included pocket pain as a primary outcome. The remainder of the included studies listed pocket pain as an adverse event of SCS implantation. Conclusions: There is a relative dearth of primary literature that examines the incidence, characteristics, and health economic implications of pocket pain in patients with SCS. This highlights the need for large‐scale, high‐quality prospective or randomized controlled trials examining pocket pain. This may ultimately help prevent and reduce pocket pain leading to improved efficacy of treatment and greater patient quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment for patients with chronic pain. With increasing healthcare costs, it is important to determine the benefits of SCS in healthcare utilization (HCU). This retrospective, single-center observational study involved 160 subjects who underwent implantation of a high-frequency (10 kHz) SCS device. We focused on assessing trends in HCU by measuring opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), as well as monitoring emergency department (ED) and office visits for interventional pain procedures during the 12-month period preceding and following the SCS implant. Our results revealed a statistically significant reduction in HCU in all domains assessed. The mean MME was 51.05 and 26.52 pre- and post-implant, respectively. There was a 24.53 MME overall decrease and a mean of 78.2% statistically significant dose reduction (p < 0.0001). Of these, 91.5% reached a minimally clinically important difference (MCID) in opioid reduction. Similarly, we found a statistically significant (p < 0.01) decrease in ED visits, with a mean of 0.12 pre- and 0.03 post-implant, and a decrease in office visits for interventional pain procedures from a 1.39 pre- to 0.28 post-10 kHz SCS implant, representing a 1.11 statistically significant (p < 0.0001) mean reduction. Our study reports the largest cohort of real-world data published to date analyzing HCU trends with 10 kHz SCS for multiple pain etiologies. Furthermore, this is the first and only study evaluating HCU trends with 10 kHz SCS by assessing opioid use, ED visits, and outpatient visits for interventional pain procedures collectively. Preceding studies have individually investigated these outcomes, consistently yielding positive results comparable to our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Psychological evaluation is required by insurance companies in the United States prior to proceeding with a spinal cord stimulation or a dorsal root ganglion stimulation trial. Since January 2017, we implemented a Multidisciplinary Team Conference for Neuromodulation in our center to facilitate the collaboration between pain physicians and psychologists and to optimize screening of neuromodulation candidates. This study aims to report the impact of this team conference on improvement of neuromodulation outcome in our center. Methods: Appropriateness of neuromodulation were discussed in the team conference after initial visit with the pain specialist and psychological evaluation. For this study, we prospectively and retrospectively collected data on neuromodulation candidates who went through the team conference and those who did not as controls. Results: We discussed 461 patients in the team conference sessions from January 2017 to July 2023. Out of these, a spinal cord stimulator or a dorsal root ganglion stimulator trial was performed in 164 patients with 80.5% (132 cases) trial success rate leading to 140 implants. Out of these implants, 26 (18.6%) explanted and 21 (15%) required revision in 41 (29.3%) patients. We performed neuraxial neuromodulation trial for 70 patients without going through the team conference from January 2016 to July 2023 with a trial success rate of 45.7% (32 cases). In this group, 7 (21.9%) and 6 (18.8%) patients underwent explant and revision. The differences between the groups were statistically significant for trial success rate (odds ratio of 4.9 with p-value of <0.01) but not for explant (odds ratio of 0.8 with p-value of 0.627) or revision (odds ratio of 0.8 with p-value of 0.595). Conclusion: Implementing Multidisciplinary Team Conference increased trial success rate in our center. Team conference provides therapeutic benefit for patients, and also provides the opportunity for an educational discussion for trainees. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The need to be competent in neuromodulation is and should be a prerequisite prior to completing a fellowship in interventional pain medicine. Unfortunately, many programs lack acceptable candidates for these advanced therapies, and fellows may not receive adequate exposure to neuromodulation procedures. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) desires to create a consensus of experts to set a minimum standard of competence for neurostimulation procedures, including spinal cord stimulation (SCS), dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S), and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). The executive board of ASPN accepted nominations for colleagues with excellence in the subject matter of neuromodulation and physician education. This diverse group used peer-reviewed literature and, based on grading of evidence and expert opinion, developed critical consensus guides for training that all accredited fellowship programs should adopt. For each consensus point, transparency and recusal were used to eliminate bias, and an author was nominated for evidence grading oversight and bias control. Pain Education and Knowledge (PEAK) Consensus Guidelines for Neuromodulation sets a standard for neuromodulation training in pain fellowship training programs. The consensus panel has determined several recommendations to improve care in the United States for patients undergoing neuromodulation. As neuromodulation training in the United States has evolved dramatically, these therapies have become ubiquitous in pain medicine. Unfortunately, fellowship programs and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) pain program requirements have not progressed training to match the demands of modern advancements. PEAK sets a new standard for fellowship training and presents thirteen practice areas vital for physician competence in neuromodulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supratentorial hemangioblastomas are benign and highly vascularized neoplasms that appear most often in the spine and posterior cranial fossa. They can also be located in the supratentorial compartment of the brain. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to better understand the clinical insights of supratentorial hemangioblastoma in adults. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the authors reviewed the English-language literature in the PubMed/MEDLINE database on supratentorial hemangioblastoma in adults, published in the past 40 years. We analyzed the differences between sporadic hemangioblastomas and hemangioblastomas associated with von Hippel-Lindau disease. In addition, we compared the characteristics of supratentorial hemangioblastomas with infratentorial and spinal cord locations. We reviewed 92 articles, describing 157 supratentorial hemangioblastomas in a total cohort of 148 adult patients. Most articles reporting supratentorial hemangioblastomas were published in the United States. Supratentorial hemangioblastomas occur more frequently in women than men. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 44.48 years. The sellar/parasellar region was the most commonly tumor location, while the most common morphological type was the solid type. Almost 80% of hemangioblastomas were completely resected; the outcome was favorable in more than 3 fourth of patients. Given their rarity, the literature on supratentorial hemangioblastomas is limited and based mostly on case reports. Complete surgical resection is the first choice of treatment and is associated with a good treatment outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Circulating sex steroid hormones are critical for neural function and development of neuroplasticity in many regions of the central nervous system. In the spinal cord, our knowledge of steroid hormone influence mostly derives from mechanistic studies of pain processing in dorsal spinal cord circuits; less is known regarding hormonal influence of ventral spinal motor function. Gonadectomy (surgical removal of the testes in males and ovaries in females) rapidly and persistently reduces circulating sex steroids in both females and males, providing a means to interrogate the role of hormones on neural function. Here we provide a next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data set to evaluate the impact of gonadectomy on the transcriptome of ventral spinal cord tissue of adult female and male rats. Measurement(s) Ventral spinal cord gene expression Technology Type(s) RNA Sequencing Factor Type(s) Ventral spinal cord gene expression Sample Characteristic - Organism Rattus norvegicus Sample Characteristic - Location United States [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an important option for patients with chronic neuropathic pain. In the United States, a successful SCS trial determines eligibility for SCS implant. Metrics to determine success are often self-reported and subjective, which may limit achievement of patient goals. This study aimed to assess whether patients undergoing SCS implant after successful trial felt that use of external accelerometry prior to implant was a useful educational tool to objectively appraise function and achievement of treatment goals. Methods: This was a single center, prospective, pilot study. Sixteen subjects with persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 underwent a percutaneous SCS trial. Five subjects did not have a successful trial, one expired after the SCS trial, before implant, and one dropped out prior to completion of post-implant follow-up visits. Nine subjects underwent SCS implant and completed the required follow-up visits. All subjects were provided an Actigraph GT3X external accelerometer, worn 7 days prior to the trial to determine baseline physical activity and during the 7-day trial to assess for change in activity from baseline. Results were shared with subjects to individualize goals for therapy. Goal attainment was assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months after implant. Subjects wore the accelerometer again 24 hours before visits to update progress in meeting treatment goals. The primary outcome was satisfaction with using accelerometry as an educational tool to appraise function and guide treatment goals for SCS therapy. Secondary outcomes included physical activity, as captured via accelerometry, as well as validated patient-reported measures of pain severity, physical functioning, and quality-of-life. Results: Eight of nine subjects were satisfied with accelerometry as an educational tool. Secondary outcomes were not reliably assessed due to poor stewardship and study execution. Conclusion: External accelerometry may assist patients in developing individualized functional treatment goals for SCS therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Gastro-esophageal (GE) junction cancer is the fastest-growing tumor, particularly in the United States (US). Objective: This study aimed to compare dosimetric and radiobiological factors among field-in-field (FIF), three-field (3F), and four-field box (4FB) radiotherapy planning techniques for gastro-esophageal junction cancer. Material and Methods: In this experimental study, thirty patients with GE junction cancer were evaluated, and three planning techniques (field-in-field (FIF), three-field (3F), and four-field box (4FB)) were performed for each patient for a 6-MV photon beam. Dose distribution in the target volume, the monitor units (MUs) required, and the dose delivered to organs at risk (OARs) were compared for these techniques using the paired-sample t-test. Results: A significant difference was measured between the FIF and 3F techniques with respect to conformity index (CI), dose homogeneity index (HI), and tumor control probability (TCP) for the target organ, as well as the Dmean for the heart, kidneys, and liver. For the spinal cord, the FIF technique showed a slight reduction in the maximum dose compared to the other two techniques. In addition, the V20 Gy of the lungs and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of all OARs were reduced with FIF method. Conclusion: The FIF technique showed better performance for treating patients with gastro-esophageal junction tumors, in terms of dose homogeneity in the target, conformity of the radiation field with the target volume, TCP, less dose to healthy organs, and fewer MU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition that affects about 17,000 individuals every year in the United States, with approximately 294,000 people living with the ramifications of the initial injury. After the initial primary injury, SCI has a secondary phase during which the spinal cord sustains further injury due to ischemia, excitotoxicity, immune-mediated damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, and oxidative stress. The multifaceted injury progression process requires a sophisticated injury-monitoring technique for an accurate assessment of SCI patients. In this narrative review, we discuss SCI monitoring modalities, including pressure probes and catheters, micro dialysis, electrophysiologic measures, biomarkers, and imaging studies. The optimal next-generation injury monitoring setup should include multiple modalities and should integrate the data to produce a final simplified assessment of the injury and determine markers of intervention to improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Fibromyalgia is a rheumatic disease with no specific laboratory markers and is insensitive to hormonal drugs and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs commonly used to treat rheumatism. Guidelines recommend that non-pharmacological therapy should be the first-line treatment for fibromyalgia. Since the publication of the first diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia in 1990, studies on acupuncture for fibromyalgia have been reported periodically. This study aims to explore the intellectual landscape of acupuncture for fibromyalgia since 1990, and to identify research trends and fronts in this field. Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection Database was searched for publications on acupuncture for fibromyalgia from 1990 to 2022. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were used to analyze the annual publication, countries, institutions, authors and cited authors, journals and cited journals, references and keywords. Results: A total of 280 publications were retrieved, and the number of publications showed an overall upward trend. The United States was the most productive country. China Medical University was the institution with the most publications. Lin Yi-wen was the most prolific author, while Wolfe was the most cited author. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine was the journal in which most of the research was published, while Pain was the most cited journal. An article by Wolfe (1990) had the most citations, but an article by Crofford (2001) had the highest centrality. The four most frequently used keywords in the included articles were mechanism, spinal cord, activation and sensitivity. Conclusion: Acupuncture can effectively relieve pain in patients with fibromyalgia and improve accompanying symptoms such as anxiety and depression. However, the design of clinical trials still needs to be optimized to better verify the efficacy of acupuncture on various clinical symptoms of fibromyalgia. Exploring the central analgesic mechanism of acupuncture on fibromyalgia is also the focus research direction now and future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Moderate to severe pain occurs in many cancer patients during their clinical course and may stem from the primary pathology, metastasis, or as treatment side effects. Uncontrolled pain using conservative medical therapy can often lead to patient distress, loss of productivity, shorter life expectancy, longer hospital stays, and increase in healthcare utilization. Various publications shed light on strategies for conservative medical management for cancer pain and a few international publications have reviewed limited interventional data. Our multi-institutional working group was assembled to review and highlight the body of evidence that exists for opioid utilization for cancer pain, adjunct medication such as ketamine and methadone and interventional therapies. We discuss neurolysis via injections, neuromodulation including targeted drug delivery and spinal cord stimulation, vertebral tumor ablation and augmentation, radiotherapy and surgical techniques. In the United States, there is a significant variance in the interventional treatment of cancer pain based on fellowship training. As a first of its kind, this best practices and interventional guideline will offer evidenced-based recommendations for reducing pain and suffering associated with malignancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a heritable neuromuscular disorder that causes degeneration of the alpha motor neurons from anterior horn cells in the spinal cord, which causes severe progressive hypotonia and muscular weakness. With a carrier frequency of 1 in 40– 50 and an estimated incidence of 1 in 10,000 live births, SMA is the second most common autosomal recessive disorder. Affected individuals with SMA have a homozygous loss of function of the survival motor neuron gene SMN1 on 5q13 but keep the modifying SMN2 gene. The most common mutation causing SMA is a homozygous deletion of the SMN1 exon 7, which can be readily detected and used as a sensitive diagnostic test. Because SMN2 produces a reduced number of full-length transcripts, the number of SMN2 copies can modify the clinical phenotype and as such, becomes an essential predictive factor. Population-based SMA carrier screening identifies carrier couples that may pass on this genetic disorder to their offspring and allows the carriers to make informed reproductive choices or prepare for immediate treatment for an affected child. Three treatments have recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nusinersen increases the expression levels of the SMN protein using an antisense oligonucleotide to alter splicing of the SMN2 transcript. Onasemnogene abeparvovec is a gene therapy that utilizes an adeno-associated virus serotype 9 vector to increase low functional SMN protein levels. Risdiplam is a small molecule that alters SMN2 splicing in order to increase functional SMN protein. Newborn screening for SMA has been shown to be successful in allowing infants to be treated before the loss of motor neurons and has resulted in improved clinical outcomes. Several of the recommendations and guidelines in the review are based on studies performed in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Factors that may drive recommendations for operative intervention for patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumors (ISCTs) have yet to be extensively studied. The authors investigated racial and socioeconomic disparities in the management of patients with primary spinal cord ependymomas and nonependymal gliomas, with the aim of determining the associations between socioeconomic patient characteristics, survival, and recommendations for the resection of primary ISCTs., Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was queried to identify all patients > 18 years of age with ISCTs diagnosed between 2000 and 2019. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios for variables associated with receiving a surgical recommendation. Log-rank tests and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS)., Results: The authors identified 2325 patients (mean age 49 [SD 16] years; 48.8% female; 67.4% non-Hispanic White, 7.8% non-Hispanic Black, 16.2% Hispanic, 6.5% Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.6% Native American; 56.7% married; 64.4% with household income < $75,000; 73.8% with spinal ependymoma; and 26.2% with nonependymal spinal glioma). Eighty-seven percent of patients received a surgical recommendation. In multivariable models, marriage was associated with higher odds of receiving a surgical recommendation for ependymomas (OR 1.80, p = 0.005). In multivariable models for nonependymal spinal gliomas, older age (OR 0.98, p = 0.001) and increased number of tumors (OR 0.62, p = 0.015) were associated with decreased odds of receiving surgical recommendations. Among ependymomas, marriage (HR 0.59, p = 0.001), younger age (HR 0.93, p < 0.001), female sex (HR 0.43, p = 0.006), and decreased number of tumors (HR 0.56, p < 0.001) were associated with improved OS. Among nonependymal spinal gliomas, median household income ≥ $75,000 (HR 0.69, p = 0.020) and younger age (HR 0.98, p < 0.001) were associated with improved DSS, while Black race (HR 4.65, p = 0.027) and older age (HR 1.05, p < 0.001) were associated with worse OS., Conclusions: In patients with spinal ependymomas and nonependymal spinal gliomas, recommendations for surgery appear to be unaffected by patient sex, race, or income. Survival disparities appear to exist among unmarried, male, Black, and lower-income cohorts. Continued initiatives to identify drivers of disparities while improving health equity in this patient population are needed.

Introduction: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most dreaded complications after spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implantation surgery. As a result, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been proposed to avoid accidental damage to nervous structures under anesthesia and confirm positioning for optimal stimulation. Our study uses a large administrative claims database to determine the 30-day risk of SCI after SCS implantation., Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases from 2016 to 2019. Adult patients undergoing SCS surgical procedures with at least 90 days of follow-up, IONM use, the type of sedation used during the procedure, and subsequent SCI were identified using administrative codes. In addition, logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between various risk factors and subsequent SCI., Results: A total of 9676 patients underwent SCS surgery (64.7% percutaneous implants) during the study period. Nine hundred and forty-four (9.75%) patients underwent SCS implantation with IONM. Conscious sedation, Monitored Anesthesia Care anesthesia, and general anesthesia were used in patients with 0.9%, 60.2%, and 28.6%, respectively. Eighty-one (0.8%) patients developed SCI within 30 days after SCS implant surgery. The SCI rate was higher in the group that underwent IONM (2% vs 0.7%, p value <0.001) during the implantation procedure, reflecting the underlying risk. After adjustment for other factors, the OR of SCI is 2.39 (95% CI: 1.33 to 4.14, p value=0.002) times higher for those with IONM than those without IONM., Conclusions: Increased SCI risk among patients with IONM likely reflects higher baseline risk, and further research is needed for risk mitigation., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: This prospective, open‐label, multicenter study evaluated the feasibility of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy programming for chronic low back pain that uses multiple electrical pulsed signals (Differential Target Multiplexed). Methods: Twenty‐five SCS candidates with low back pain equal to or greater than lower limb pain were enrolled at 7 sites in the United States. The subjects evaluated standard and Differential Target Multiplexed programs, each for 4 ± 1 days. A commercially available SCS trial system was used for standard SCS therapy programming. During the trialing of the multiplexed programs, implanted temporary leads were connected to an investigational external trial stimulator system. Results: Twenty subjects concluded the study. The mean baseline numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score for low back pain was 7.4, with a mean age of 62.4 years and mean pain duration of 18.0 years. Significant relief in back pain was observed for both treatments, with significantly better response with multiplexed programming. At the end of the trial period, subjects reported a reduction in their mean NPRS score from baseline to 4.2 after standard programming and to 2.4 after Differential Target Multiplexed programming. The difference between standard and multiplexed programming was significant. The responder rate for low back pain relief was 50% for standard programming and 80% for Differential Target Multiplexed programming. Eighty‐five percent of subjects who evaluated both programming approaches preferred Differential Target Multiplexed SCS. Conclusion: In this difficult‐to‐treat patient population, subjects reported significant reduction in chronic back pain when using multiplexed programming. A randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm the results from this feasibility study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The opioid epidemic challenges current attitudes toward pain management and necessitates the reexamination of the World Health Organization (WHO) 3-step analgesic ladder, introduced in 1986 for cancer pain management. Surgical treatment of pain is a logical extension of the original guideline, which is often absent in conversations with patients about treatment options for their pain and consequentially underutilized. However, with concerns growing regarding opioid use, a shift in the stepwise approach of the WHO analgesic ladder in an age of developing technology and surgical offerings could have profound implications for patients and public health. Surgical interventions potentially provide a long-term, cost-effective management strategy to reduce opioid use. This review canvasses surgical options, highlights literature on failed back surgery syndrome and spinal cord stimulation and reconsiders the current ladder approach to pain management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Although spinal cord stimulators (SCS) continue to gain acceptance as a viable nonpharmacologic option for the treatment of chronic back pain, recent trends are not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate recent overall demographic and regional trends in paddle lead SCS placement and to determine if differences in trends exist between private-payer and Medicare beneficiaries. Methods: A retrospective review of Medicare and private-payer insurance records from 2007–2014 was performed to identify patients who underwent a primary paddle lead SCS placement via a laminectomy (CPT-63655). Each study cohort was queried to determine the annual rate of SCS placements and demographic characteristics. Yearly SCS implantation rates within the study cohorts were adjusted per 100,000 beneficiaries. A chi-square analysis was used to compare changes in annual rates. Results: A total of 31,352 Medicare and 2,935 private-payer patients were identified from 2007 to 2014. Paddle lead SCS placements ranged from 5.9 to 17.5 (p<0.001), 1.9 to 5.9 (p<0.001), and 5.2 to 14.5 (p<0.001) placements per 100,000 Medicare, private-payer, and overall beneficiaries respectively from 2007 to 2014. SCS placements peaked in 2013 with 19.6, 7.1, and 16.8 placements per 100,000 Medicare, private-payer, and overall patients. Conclusion: There was an overall increase in the annual rate of SCS placements from 2007 to 2014. Paddle lead SCS placements peaked in 2013 for Medicare, private-payer, and overall beneficiaries. The highest incidence of implantation was in the Southern region of the United States and among females. Yearly adjusted rates of SCSs were higher among Medicare patients at all time points. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic midline low back pain is the number one reason for disability in the United States despite the prolific use of medical and surgical interventions. Notwithstanding the widespread use of epidural spinal cord stimulators (SCSs), there remains a large portion of the population with inadequate pain control thought to be because of the limited volume of stimulated neural tissue. Intradural SCSs represent an underexplored alternative strategy with the potential to improve selectivity, power efficiency, and efficacy. We studied and carried out development of an intradural form of an SCS. Herein we present the findings of in vivo testing of a prototype intradural SCS in a porcine model. Six female juvenile pigs underwent surgical investigation. One control animal underwent a laminectomy only, whereas the 5 other animals had implantation of an intradural SCS prototype. One of the prototypes was fully wired to enable acute stimulation and concurrent electromyographic recordings. All animals underwent terminal surgery 3 months postimplantation, with harvesting of the spinal column. Imaging (microcomputed tomography scan) and histopathologic examinations were subsequently performed. All animals survived implantation without evidence of neurologic deficits or infection. Postmortem imaging and histopathologic examination of the spinal column revealed no evidence of spinal cord damage, cerebrospinal fluid fistula formation, abnormal bony overgrowth, or dural defect. Viable dura was present between the intra- and extradural plates of the device. Electromyographic recordings revealed evoked motor units from the stimulator. Chronically implanted intradural device in the porcine model demonstrated safety and feasibility for translation into humans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is an emerging disorder primarily affecting children that is characterized by acute flaccid paralysis accompanied by abnormalities of the spinal cord gray matter on magnetic resonance imaging. In most cases, prodromal fever or respiratory symptoms occur, followed by acute-onset flaccid limb weakness. Respiratory, axial, bulbar, facial, and extraocular muscles may also be affected. The clinical manifestations have been described as "polio-like," due to striking similarities to cases of poliomyelitis. The primary site of injury in AFM is the anterior horn cells of the spinal cord, resulting in a motor neuronopathy. Seasonal peaks of cases have occurred in the United States every 2 years since 2012. However, AFM remains a rare disease, which can make it challenging for physicians to recognize and differentiate from other causes of acute flaccid paralysis such as Guillain–Barre syndrome, spinal cord stroke, and transverse myelitis. Epidemiological evidence suggests that AFM is linked to a viral etiology, with nonpolio enteroviruses (in particular enterovirus D68) demonstrating a plausible association. The epidemiology, possible etiological factors, clinical features, differential diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of AFM are discussed in this review. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a severe illness similar to paralytic poliomyelitis. It is unclear how frequently AFM occurred in U.S. children after poliovirus elimination. In 2014, an AFM cluster was identified in Colorado, prompting passive US surveillance that yielded 120 AFM cases of unconfirmed etiology. Subsequently, increased reports were received in 2016 and 2018. To help inform investigations on causality of the recent AFM outbreaks, our objective was to determine how frequently AFM had occurred before 2014, and if 2014 cases had different characteristics. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study covering 2005–2014 at 5 pediatric centers in 3 U.S. regions. Possible AFM cases aged ≤18 years were identified by searching discharge ICD-9 codes and spinal cord MRI reports (>37,000). Neuroradiologists assessed MR images, and medical charts were reviewed; possible cases were classified as AFM, not AFM, or indeterminate. Results: At 5 sites combined, 26 AFM cases were identified from 2005–2013 (average annual number, 3 [2.4 cases/100,000 pediatric hospitalizations]) and 18 from 2014 (12.6 cases/100,000 hospitalizations; Poisson exact p<0.0001). A cluster of 13 cases was identified in September–October 2014 (temporal scan p = 0.0001). No other temporal or seasonal trend was observed. Compared with cases from January 2005–July 2014 (n = 29), cases from August–December 2014 (n = 15) were younger (p = 0.002), more frequently had a preceding respiratory/febrile illness (p = 0.03), had only upper extremities involved (p = 0.008), and had upper extremity monoplegia (p = 0.03). The cases had higher WBC counts in cerebrospinal fluid (p = 0.013). Conclusion: Our data support emergence of AFM in 2014 in the United States, and those cases demonstrated distinctive features compared with preceding sporadic cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Spinal cord stimulation has been an established treatment for chronic back and leg pain for more than 50 years; however, outcomes are variable and unpredictable, and objective evidence of the mechanism of action is needed. A novel spinal cord stimulation system provides the first in vivo, real-time, continuous objective measure of spinal cord activation in response to therapy via recorded evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) in patients during daily use. These ECAPs are also used to optimise programming and deliver closed-loop spinal cord stimulation by adjusting the stimulation current to maintain activation within patients' therapeutic window. We aimed to examine pain relief and the extent of spinal cord activation with ECAP-controlled closed-loop versus fixed-output, open-loop spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain.Methods: This multicentre, double-blind, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial was done at 13 specialist clinics, academic centres, and hospitals in the USA. Patients with chronic, intractable pain of the back and legs (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] pain score ≥60 mm; Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] score 41-80) who were refractory to conservative therapy, on stable pain medications, had no previous experience with spinal cord stimulation, and were appropriate candidates for a spinal cord stimulation trial were screened. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ECAP-controlled closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (investigational group) or fixed-output, open-loop spinal cord stimulation (control group). The randomisation sequence was computer generated with permuted blocks of size 4 and 6 and stratified by site. Patients, investigators, and site staff were masked to the treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a reduction of 50% or more in overall back and leg pain with no increase in pain medications. Non-inferiority (δ=10%) followed by superiority were tested in the intention-to-treat population at 3 months (primary analysis) and 12 months (additional prespecified analysis) after the permanent implant. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02924129, and is ongoing.Findings: Between Feb 21, 2017, and Feb 20, 2018, 134 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (67 to each treatment group). The intention-to-treat analysis comprised 125 patients at 3 months (62 in the closed-loop group and 63 in the open-loop group) and 118 patients at 12 months (59 in the closed-loop group and 59 in the open-loop group). The primary outcome was achieved in a greater proportion of patients in the closed-loop group than in the open-loop group at 3 months (51 [82·3%] of 62 patients vs 38 [60·3%] of 63 patients; difference 21·9%, 95% CI 6·6-37·3; p=0·0052) and at 12 months (49 [83·1%] of 59 patients vs 36 [61·0%] of 59 patients; difference 22·0%, 6·3-37·7; p=0·0060). We observed no differences in safety profiles between the two groups. The most frequently reported study-related adverse events in both groups were lead migration (nine [7%] patients), implantable pulse generator pocket pain (five [4%]), and muscle spasm or cramp (three [2%]).Interpretation: ECAP-controlled closed-loop stimulation provided significantly greater and more clinically meaningful pain relief up to 12 months than open-loop spinal cord stimulation. Greater spinal cord activation seen in the closed-loop group suggests a mechanistic explanation for the superior results, which aligns with the putative mechanism of action for spinal cord stimulation and warrants further investigation.Funding: Saluda Medical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating, life-altering, neurological event that affects ∼300,000 individuals in the United States. Currently, there are no effective treatments to reverse the neurological impairments caused by the lesion. Until a cure is available, there is an urgent need for strategies that can either spare injured neurons or promote neuroplasticity and functional recovery. Genetic links to outcomes after SCI may provide insights into the pathological mechanisms, and possible new avenues for drug development. In the present review, we discuss the current knowledge linking apolipoprotein E genotypes with better or worse functional outcomes after an SCI, and the possible molecular mechanisms that may contribute to this association. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), a common invasive neuromodulation technique, induces pain relief via electrical stimulation of the dorsal column of the spinal cord. To present an overview of research publications on SCS, a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications from 1998 to 2017 was performed. The relevant data were obtained from the Web of Science and PubMed database. These articles were classified into several categories, such as total number, countries, institutions, authors, and citations reports. The analysis of co-occurrence key words was handled by VOSviewer software. We found that there existed an increasing trend in the number of publications on SCS between 1998 and 2017. Among these countries, the United States published the largest number of papers in the past 20 years. Case Western Reserve University in the United States contributed the most publications. Among all research categories, neuroscience neurology was the most common area. In addition, regarding article types, basic research comprised a great proportion of the total papers on SCS in the PubMed database. The author V. Reggie Edgerton from the United States was the most-frequent contributor among the authors. The results showed that "spinal cord," "stimulation," and "pain" were the most common key words in the past 20 years. This bibliometric analysis first provides a basic overview of research publications on SCS published during the last 2 decades. Considering the expanded indications of SCS, there are a lot of things to do, and various countries should increase support to complete high-quality SCS studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is an emerging virus that has been identified as a cause of recent outbreaks of acute flaccid myelitis (AFM), a poliomyelitis-like spinal cord syndrome that can result in permanent paralysis and disability. In experimental mouse models, EV-D68 spreads to, infects, and kills spinal motor neurons following infection by various routes of inoculation. The topography of virus-induced motor neuron loss correlates with the pattern of paralysis. The mechanism(s) by which EV-D68 spreads to target motor neurons remains unclear. We sought to determine the capacity of EV-D68 to spread by the neuronal route and to determine the role of known EV-D68 receptors, sialic acid and intracellular adhesion molecule 5 (ICAM-5), in neuronal infection. To do this, we utilized a microfluidic chamber culture system in which human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) motor neuron cell bodies and axons can be compartmentalized for independent experimental manipulation. We found that EV-D68 can infect motor neurons via their distal axons and spread by retrograde axonal transport to the neuronal cell bodies. Virus was not released from the axons via anterograde axonal transport after infection of the cell bodies. Prototypic strains of EV-D68 depended on sialic acid for axonal infection and transport, while contemporary circulating strains isolated during the 2014 EV-D68 outbreak did not. The pattern of infection did not correspond with the ICAM-5 distribution and expression in either human tissue, the mouse model, or the iPSC motor neurons. IMPORTANCE Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) infections are on the rise worldwide. Since 2014, the United States has experienced biennial spikes in EV-D68-associated acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) that have left hundreds of children paralyzed. Much remains to be learned about the pathogenesis of EV-D68 in the central nervous system (CNS). Herein we investigated the mechanisms of EV-D68 CNS invasion through neuronal pathways. A better understanding of EV-D68 infection in experimental models may allow for better prevention and treatment strategies of EV-D68 CNS disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the SEER (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results) program are the 2 largest cancer registries in the United States. However, considerable differences exist between them regarding the sampling frame as well as the participating facility characteristics. In this study, NCDB and SEER are compared for primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors with the aims of discussing the implications for researchers and evaluating the generalizability of both databases. Patients with primary CNS (brain and spinal cord) tumors from 2004 to 2013 were identified using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition topographic codes. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment-related variables were compared between the 2 databases using standardized differences, with values >0.1 denoting statistical significance. A total of 588,534 primary brain tumor (NCDB, 416,162; SEER, 172,372) and 34,827 primary spinal cord tumor (NCDB, 26,602; SEER, 8225) cases were identified. We found significant differences regarding age (sd. diff., 0.16 for brain; 0.13 for spinal cord), and Hispanic origin (sd. diff., 0.34 for brain; 0.61 for spinal cord). For NCDB and SEER patients, estimated 5-year overall survival was 59% and 64%, respectively. Analysis of 623,361 patients with primary CNS tumors, which are identified using both the NCDB and SEER databases, showed significant differences in age, histopathologic classification of tumors, tumor behavior, and treatment of tumors between 2 databases. Overall, the differences observed between 2 databases provide helpful points for the researchers who would like to use NCDB or SEER. These observations should be taken into account when researchers design studies using these databases and discuss the generalizability of their findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background With the aging population in the United States, it can be anticipated that the prevalence of spinal cord injuries (SCIs) and cancer will increase. Primary or metastatic spine tumors sit at a unique intersection of these 2 realms. Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence, outcomes, and complications after the management of SCI arising from spinal tumors. Methods In the present retrospective evaluation, all patients with SCI and a diagnosis of primary or metastatic spinal cancer who had been admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation unit at a level 1 trauma center from January 2003 to January 2014 were evaluated. The demographic data (age, sex, race/ethnicity), tumor characteristics, American Spinal Injury Association score, and complications were evaluated. Results A total of 757 SCI entries were identified, and 685 unique patients met our inclusion criteria. Of those, 81 had SCIs due to spinal tumors (11.8% of all SCIs and 19.2% of nontraumatic SCIs). Most tumors were located in the thoracic region (65.4%) and were primary central nervous system in origin (21.0%), including meningioma (7.4%), schwannoma (3.7%), and ependymoma (2.5%). The next most common origins of the spinal tumors were metastases from the lung (17.3%), prostate (9.9%), kidney (8.6%), lymphoma (7.4%), and multiple myeloma (7.4%). Of these patients, 76.5% underwent surgical management, with a complications rate of 61.3%. The overall mortality rate at the latest follow-up examination was 63.0%. Conclusions SCI associated with spinal tumor is often managed surgically and associated with high rates of complications. The present study has demonstrated longer survival rates compared with the existing data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Disseminated histoplasmosis is a rare entity that occurs as a result of hematogenous spread of the organism within macrophages during acute infection. Risk factors for dissemination include HIV infection, being on TNF-α inhibitors, transplant recipients, and extremes of age. • Organ systems affected in disseminated histoplasmosis can be numerous and include skin, bone marrow, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, and adrenal glands. The differential diagnosis for adrenal insufficiency should include histoplasmosis in endemic areas. • Central nervous system histoplasmosis should be included in the differential diagnosis when a patient presents with meningitis, encephalitis, or isolated brain or spinal cord lesions in endemic areas. Histoplasmosis is the most common endemic mycosis in the United States and is caused by the organism Histoplasma capsulatum. Infection is often asymptomatic or self-limited, but when symptomatic it usually presents in the form of pulmonary histoplasmosis. In its most severe form, H. capsulatum can spread to extrapulmonary sites causing disseminated infection. Here we present a peculiar case of central nervous system (CNS) histoplasmosis wherein multiple focal spinal cord lesions were the only manifestation of CNS infection, causing bilateral lower extremity paresis and loss of sensation. Although uncommon, CNS histoplasmosis should be included in the differential diagnosis when a patient presents with meningitis, encephalitis, or isolated brain or spinal cord lesions in endemic areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) compromises the vast majority of lymphomas and predominantly takes on the form of B-cell lymphomas. More specifically, 30% of all newly diagnosed cases of NHL in the United States (US) are of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) type, making it the most prevalent form of NHL in the US. Arising from either nodal or extra-nodal lymphatic tissue origin, DLBCL is an aggressive tumor which is fatal if left untreated. Primary central nervous system lymphoma is rare; however, when diagnosed, it presents as a DLBCL in 90% of patients. Herein, we present an elderly male complaining initially of acute epigastric pain but soon afterward developed acute spinal cord compressive symptoms; subsequently, it was found to be caused by a primary DLBCL diagnosed in the thoracic spinal cord. This case report presents a rare condition with unexpected initial presentation, and we attempt to illustrate the importance of early detection and treatment of DLBCL in attaining more favorable prognostic and survival rates among patients. Written consent was obtained from the patient after reading a written summary of the case report. This consent was checked and approved from the Scientific Board of the University of Aleppo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiation therapy normal tissue dose constraints are critical when treating children with cancer due to the vulnerability of developing organs to toxicity and the many years over which these effects can evolve. Guidelines in international clinical trials have been instrumental in shaping how treatment plans are designed; however, consistency among organs at risk (OARs) constraints has not been previously evaluated. In this study we identify the variations in OAR-specific dose constraints within pediatric trials both in the United States (US) and in Europe. All US pediatric trials from the COG website were included up until 1/1/2020 along with a sampling of European trials accessible in the Netherlands. Dose constraints were identified and built into an interactive web application with filters to display data by OAR, protocol, dose, volume, and fractionation scheme. Dose constraints were compared between pediatric US and European trials by graphical intercomparison and by comparing high dose constraints (maximum dose [Dmax] or dose to a volume ≤ 20%) and by dose metrics that were commonly used across protocols. Sixty-five trials were included with the US trials (53) represented by the COG/CCG/POG and the European trials (12) represented by the SIOP, EURAMOS, GPOH, DCOG, and EpSSG. Thirty-three separate OARs were found with high variability within the trials for each OAR, ranging from different maximum tolerable doses to variations of volumetric dose constraints. Seven organs had 10 to 18 different constraints and included serial organs such as the spinal cord, optic chiasm, optic nerves, and brainstem as well as parallel organs including the lungs, liver, and heart. An example of dose variability can be seen with the spinal cord Dmax constraint ranging from 50 Gy to V59 < 10%, the optic nerves constraint ranging from a Dmax of 45 Gy to 60 Gy, the heart V30 constraint ranging from 40-100%, and the kidney D50% constraint ranging from 8-24 Gy. When comparing high dose tolerances between US and European trials, US constraints were higher for four OARs—bladder (V70 < 20% vs Dmax < 60), lungs (V20 < 20% vs Dmax < 18), mandible (V77 < 1cc vs Dmax < 60), and spinal cord (V57 < 10% vs Dmax < 54); lower for four OARs—brainstem (V63 < 10% vs V64 < 10%), heart (Dmax < 30 vs Dmax < 30.6), kidneys (Dmax < 15 vs Dmax < 19.8), and liver (Dmax < 15 vs Dmax < 23.4); and identical in four OARs—brain, optic chiasm, optic nerves, and bowel. Review of pediatric dose-volume constraints in clinical trials showed substantial variability for all OARs. Continued focus on standardization of OAR dose constraints and risk profiles are essential to improving clinical trial consistency and improving understanding of dose-response in the pediatric population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification is a known predictor of postoperative complication in diverse surgical settings. However, its predictive value is not established in single-level elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (SLE-ACDF).Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of ASA classification system on 30-day morbidity following SLE-ACDF.Design/setting: Patients who underwent SLE-ACDF between 2011 and 2013 were selected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.Patient Sample: A total of 6,148 patients were selected from the 2011-2013 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.Outcome Measures: All outcomes are self-report measures as tracked by dedicated clinical reviewers via prospective review of inpatient charts, outpatient clinic visits, and direct contact with the surgical team.Methods: Propensity score matching and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate ASA classification as 30-day morbidity predictor. This study has no financial conflict and has no potential conflict of interest to disclose.Results: A total of 6,148 patients were analyzed in this study. Patients in the ASA >II cohort had higher incidence of comorbidities and postoperative complications (overall complication, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, ventilator dependent >48 hours, cerebrovascular accident or stroke, catastrophic outcome, and airway complication). Propensity score matching yielded 1,628 pairs of well-matched patients. Multivariable analyses with the propensity score matched dataset revealed the following associations between ASA class >II and 30-day outcomes: any complication (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-1.41), pneumonia (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.33-4.56), unplanned intubation (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.41-5.36), ventilator >48 hours (OR 5.92, 95% CI 0.69-50.96), catastrophic outcome (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.39-2.71), and airway complication (OR 2.21, 95% CI 0.67-7.29).Conclusions: Although we did not detect associations between ASA class >II and adverse 30-day outcomes following SLE-ACDF, imprecision of estimates precludes definitive inferences. Although ASA classification allows simple assessment of patients' physiological status, their overall perioperativerisk factors need to be considered collectively for adequate optimization and improved outcomes in SLE-ACDF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose Ethnicity-related differences in the incidence of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis ( ADEM) and other demyelinating diseases including multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders have been reported. Little is reported on the influence of ethnicity and geographical location in ADEM. Methods Medical records of patients who presented with ADEM ( ICD-9 323.61 and 323.81) at large referral hospitals in China, Singapore and Japan (years 1992-2015) were retrospectively reviewed and data were collected in a centralized database. Presenting features and outcomes of ADEM were compared between this multi-country Asian cohort and a uniformly collected US cohort using risk differences and risk ratios. Both cohorts were standardized to a 35% pediatric population to facilitate the comparison. Results There were 83 Asian patients (48 male, 16 pediatric) followed for a median of 2 (25th-75th percentile 1-10) months. Asian patients exhibited a 26% higher prevalence of spinal cord involvement on magnetic resonance imaging [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-52%; P = 0.05; 63% vs. 37%], a 39% lower prevalence of preceding events (95% CI 12-65%; P < 0.01; 33% vs. 72%) and a 23% lower prevalence of corpus callosum involvement (95% CI 7-39%; P < 0.01; 8% vs. 31%). No difference was observed between the two cohorts in the probability of relapse over the first year after disease onset. Conclusions It is hypothesized that the high proportion of Asian patients with spinal cord lesions relates to genetic vulnerability or the higher incidence of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in Asia or could be a spurious association. ADEM presentations most probably vary across geographical settings or ethnicities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The NRG-BR001 trial is the first National Cancer Institute-sponsored trial to treat multiple (range 2-4) extracranial metastases with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Benchmark credentialing is required to ensure adherence to this complex protocol, in particular, for metastases in close proximity. The present report summarizes the dosimetric results and approval rates.Methods and Materials: The benchmark used anonymized data from a patient with bilateral adrenal metastases, separated by <5 cm of normal tissue. Because the planning target volume (PTV) overlaps with organs at risk (OARs), institutions must use the planning priority guidelines to balance PTV coverage (45 Gy in 3 fractions) against OAR sparing. Submitted plans were processed by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core and assessed by the protocol co-chairs by comparing the doses to targets, OARs, and conformity metrics using nonparametric tests.Results: Of 63 benchmarks submitted through October 2015, 94% were approved, with 51% approved at the first attempt. Most used volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) (78%), a single plan for both PTVs (90%), and prioritized the PTV over the stomach (75%). The median dose to 95% of the volume was 44.8 ± 1.0 Gy and 44.9 ± 1.0 Gy for the right and left PTV, respectively. The median dose to 0.03 cm3 was 14.2 ± 2.2 Gy to the spinal cord and 46.5 ± 3.1 Gy to the stomach. Plans that spared the stomach significantly reduced the dose to the left PTV and stomach. Conformity metrics were significantly better for single plans that simultaneously treated both PTVs with VMAT, intensity modulated radiation therapy, or 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy compared with separate plans. No significant differences existed in the dose at 2 cm from the PTVs.Conclusions: Although most plans used VMAT, the range of conformity and dose falloff was large. The decision to prioritize either OARs or PTV coverage varied considerably, suggesting that the toxicity outcomes in the trial could be affected. Several benchmarks met the dose-volume histogram metrics but produced unacceptable plans owing to low conformity. Dissemination of a frequently-asked-questions document improved the approval rate at the first attempt. Benchmark credentialing was found to be a valuable tool for educating institutions about the protocol requirements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are increasingly used for the treatment of chronic pain. There is a need for studies with long-term follow-up., Objective: To determine the comparative effectiveness and costs of SCSs compared with conventional medical management (CMM) in a large cohort of patients with chronic pain., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a 1:5 propensity-matched retrospective comparative effectiveness research analysis of insured individuals from April 1, 2016, to August 31, 2018. This study used administrative claims data, including longitudinal medical and pharmacy claims, from US commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees 18 years or older in Optum Labs Data Warehouse. Patients with incident diagnosis codes for failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, chronic pain syndrome, and other chronic postsurgical back and extremity pain were included in this study. Data were analyzed from February 1, 2021, to August 31, 2022., Exposures: SCSs or CMM., Main Outcomes and Measures: Surrogate measures for primary chronic pain treatment modalities, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic pain interventions (epidural and facet corticosteroid injections, radiofrequency ablation, and spine surgery), as well as total costs., Results: In the propensity-matched population of 7560 patients, mean (SD) age was 63.5 (12.5) years, 3080 (40.7%) were male, and 4480 (59.3%) were female. Among matched patients, during the first 12 months, patients treated with SCSs had higher odds of chronic opioid use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.29) compared with patients treated with CMM but lower odds of epidural and facet corticosteroid injections (aOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.39-0.51), radiofrequency ablation (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44-0.72), and spine surgery (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85). During months 13 to 24, there was no significant difference in chronic opioid use (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.94-1.20), epidural and facet corticosteroid injections (aOR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.87-1.14), radiofrequency ablation (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66-1.09), or spine surgery (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-1.09) with SCS use compared with CMM. Overall, 226 of 1260 patients (17.9%) treated with SCS experienced SCS-related complications within 2 years, and 279 of 1260 patients (22.1%) had device revisions and/or removals, which were not always for complications. Total costs of care in the first year were $39 000 higher with SCS than CMM and similar between SCS and CMM in the second year., Conclusions and Relevance: In this large, real-world, comparative effectiveness research study comparing SCS and CMM for chronic pain, SCS placement was not associated with a reduction in opioid use or nonpharmacologic pain interventions at 2 years. SCS was associated with higher costs, and SCS-related complications were common.

Introduction: Spinal cord stimulators (SCS) are available with either primary cell (PC) or rechargeable cell (RC) batteries. Although RC systems are proposed to have a battery longevity upward of nine years, in comparison with four years for PC systems, there are few studies of longevity of SCS in the real world., Materials and Methods: This was an observational, nonrandomized, retrospective study of Medicare beneficiaries who received neurostimulator implants in the outpatient hospital. This study used Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2013 to 2020. The clinical longevity of the implantable pulse generator (IPG), defined as the duration from implant until removal for any reason, was compared between PC and RC devices. Life distribution analysis was used to approximate device lifespan. The secondary analysis separated removals into explant or replacements. The statistics were adjusted for relevant clinical covariates., Results: A total of 25,856 PC and 79,606 RC systems were included in the study. At seven years after implant, 53.8% of PC IPGs and 55.0% of RC IPGs remained in use. The life distribution modeling analysis projected a median lifespan of 8.2 years for PC and 9.0 years for RC devices. The rate of explant was lower for PC devices (19.2%) than for RC devices (22.0%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.96, p = 0.082), whereas the rate of replacements was higher for PC devices (33.7%) than for RC devices (29.5%, HR = 1.31, p < 0.001). An analysis of the battery type used in device replacements showed an increasing adoption of PC devices over time., Conclusions: This large, retrospective, real-world analysis of Medicare claims data demonstrated that the clinical longevity of neurostimulator devices is similar for PC and RC batteries. In the past, clinicians may have defaulted to RC devices based on the assumption that they provided extended battery life. Considering this longevity data, clinicians should now consider the choice between PC and RC devices based on other individual factors pertinent to the patient experience and not on purported longevity claims., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Surgery is routinely performed to decompress the spinal cord. While a number of imaging modalities are currently used in the perioperative setting of surgical spinal cord decompression including computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound (US) usage is relatively new. Therefore, only a few studies in the literature describe its value in the perioperative setting. US is a simple, safe, rapid, non-invasive, and inexpensive modality that constitutes a potential alternative when other modalities are not suitable or unavailable. It enables surgeons to generate high-resolution real-time images that can aid in diagnosing pathologies, guiding surgeries, and evaluating surgical outcomes. This review discusses the present literature and utility of pre-, intra-, and post-operative US in patients undergoing surgical spinal decompression. We also delineate three cases in which US was utilized at King Saud University hospital, which is considered one of the first centers in our region to report the use of US to guide treatment in spine surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective An international panel of pain specialists (anesthesiology, neurology, neurosurgery, and psychology) and research methodologists developed a screening tool to identify patients who may be suitable for spinal cord stimulation ( SCS)-the Refractory Chronic Pain Screening Tool ( RCPST) prototype. We describe a feasibility study to explore practicality and validity of this prototype. Design Consecutive outpatients were screened in two centers ( United Kingdom and United States). Sixty chronic pain adults without satisfactory pain relief despite treatment were assessed using RCPST (by pain specialist without expertise in neurostimulation) and then evaluated by two pain specialists experienced in SCS implantation and management to determine whether the patient should be referred for SCS. To maintain blinding, the participating physicians did not inform each other or the patient of assessment outcome. Sensitivity and specificity of the RCPST prototype were calculated using implanters' judgment as 'gold standard.' Results The average age of patients was 47.7 years; 53% were female. Fifty-seven patients completed the study (one withdrew consent, two lost to follow-up). The pain specialists agreed the prototype was easy to use and took <10 minutes to complete. Implanter agreement was moderate ( Kappa: 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.91). The prototype had low sensitivity (40%, 19-61%) and moderate specificity (78%, 65-92%). Using the same questionnaire with a modified decision algorithm, new prototypes were generated with range of high sensitivity (80-100%) and specificity (89-97%) values. Conclusions The RCPST aims to identify patients that should be referred for consideration for neurostimulation. The final implant decision requires appropriate neurological diagnostic workup, psychological assessment, and trial stimulation. RCPST was considered practical for routine clinical practice and contained appropriate questions. Sensitivity needs to be improved. A future study should select and validate the ideal RCPST prototype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The concept of neuromodulation via the use of spinal cord stimulators ( SCS) was first established over forty years ago. Since then, its popularity has grown as numerous studies have demonstrated its utility to reduce chronic pain, improve patient function, and reduce long-term health care costs. The aim of this study was to update the pain medicine community on the evolution of SCS practice trends in academic centers. Design Ninety-three pain medicine fellowship programs in the United States were identified from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Website and were contacted to participate in an internet survey. A 37-item questionnaire was inspired by a previous study performed by Fanciullo et al. Questions focused on three main themes regarding SCS clinical application, namely demographics, education, and technical matters. Results Completed surveys were received from 50 institutions, all of which reported performing SCS interventions. Annual implants ranged from 0 to 150. Fellowship training was cited as the most valuable modality for learning implantation. Nearly all programs reported manufacturer representative participation during SCS procedures, with a minority of program directors discouraging their involvement in fellow education. SCS trials were performed exclusively on an outpatient basis. The average length for trials was 4-7 days. The most common indication for SCS implantation was failed back surgery syndrome, which also had the highest 2-year success rate. Post procedure, patients generally were followed up every 2-4 weeks for device reprogramming, which was performed by company representatives 92% of the time. Conclusion Standardized SCS training is imperative as the implementation of neuromodulation therapy continues to increase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Spinal cord stimulators (SCS) allow spine surgeons to provide relief for patients who suffer from chronic pain due to several disorders, such as failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, and neuropathy. Despite this, there remains a paucity of data regarding the utilization and reimbursement of SCS. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the monetary and procedural trends of spinal cord stimulators among the Medicare database from 2000 to 2019., Methods: Medicare Part B National Summary Data files, which are publicly available, were used. These files contain data from the years 2000-2019 on all services billed to Medicare within that time frame. Each service is given a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code and the number of times that service was performed, as well as the total physician Medicare charges and reimbursements for each service annually are included in that data set. The CPT codes for percutaneous and open placement of spinal cord stimulators were identified: 63650 and 63655, respectively. The total allowed services allowed charges and actual payments were isolated from the data set for each year for each CPT code. The total allowed charges and actual payments for the year were then divided by the total allowed services to find and trend the allowed charges and actual payment for each individual service performed for both percutaneous and open placement of spinal cord stimulators., Results: There were 992,372 Medicare-approved total percutaneous spinal cord stimulator operations and 99,736 Medicare-approved total open spinal cord stimulator operations from 2000 to 2019. Medicare paid $1.02 billion (2019 U.S. dollars) in reimbursement to physicians for percutaneous spinal cord stimulator operations and nearly $145 million (2019 U.S. dollars) in reimbursement to physicians for open spinal cord stimulator operations. From the years 2000 to 2019, there was an average 21.9% increase annually in Medicare-approved percutaneous spinal stimulator placement operations and a 18.4% increase annually in Medicare-approved open spinal stimulator placement operations. During this time, there was also an average 8.7% increase annually in Medicare reimbursement per each percutaneous spinal stimulator placement operation and a 9.1% increase annually in Medicare reimbursement per each open spinal stimulator placement operation., Conclusions: The results of this study show that the number of percutaneous and open procedures have steadily increased from 2000 to 2019. Reimbursement per procedure has also increased steadily over this time. Identifying these trends is important to promote research into costs of these surgeries and ensure adequate resource allocation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Pain problems are more prevalent in Native Americans than in any other group in the U.S., and this might result from group differences in pain modulation. This study was designed to examine emotional modulation of pain and spinal nociception in healthy, pain-free Native Americans (n =21) relative to non-Hispanic Whites (n =20). To assess emotional modulation of pain and the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR, a physiological measure of spinal nociception), participants underwent a well-validated emotional picture-viewing paradigm during which suprathreshold pain stimuli were delivered to the ankle. Compared to Whites, Native Americans reported less pleasure to erotic pictures and failed to show corrugator reactivity to mutilation pictures. Unlike Whites, Native Americans only evidenced pain inhibition in response to erotica, but no pain facilitation (disinhibition) to mutilation pictures. Emotional modulation of NFR was similar in both groups. These preliminary findings suggest that Native Americans failed to disinhibit pain, perhaps due to over-activation of pain inhibitory mechanisms. Chronic over-activation of this system could ultimately exhaust it, thus putting Native Americans at future risk for chronic pain. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is considered a minimally invasive and reversible neuromodulation therapy for various chronic pain disorders. The rates of infection following SCS surgery reported in the literature range from 2.8% to 10%. Several studies indicated no potential benefit of postoperative antibiotics (beyond 24 hours) on subsequent device infection. This study aimed to understand the characteristics of postoperative antibiotic prescriptions and subsequent infections following SCS surgery., Materials and Methods: The study was a retrospective cohort using the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases from 2013 to 2018. Adult patients undergoing SCS surgical procedures with at least 90 days of follow-up were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) codes. Postprocedural oral antibiotics within 14 days and preprocedural corticosteroid use within seven days were identified using National Drug Codes (NDC). Administrative claims were analyzed to understand the characteristics of prescribed postoperative antibiotics. Infection-related complications within 90 days were identified using administrative codes., Results: A total of 18,105 patients (age 55.5 ± 13.1 years, 40.2% male) underwent SCS surgery during the study period. Postprocedural oral antibiotics and preprocedural steroids were prescribed for 35.3% and 2.6%, respectively, for SCS surgery patients. The most commonly used postprocedural antibiotics were cephalexin (55.4%) and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (10.6%). The most common duration of antibiotic prescriptions was seven, ten, and five days in our study, from most to least common duration. Superficial surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, device infection, or any infection within 90 days occurred in 2.9%, 1.0%, 1.8%, and 4%, respectively, of the patients undergoing SCS surgery., Conclusions: Prospective studies are needed to understand the reasons for noncompliance with expert consensus recommendations on postoperative antibiotic use beyond 24 hours of SCS surgery. Neuromodulation team members should play an important role in antibiotic stewardship., (Copyright © 2021 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND: Primary tumors of the spinal cord, spinal meninges, and cauda equina are relatively rare, and a paucity of population-based data exist on tumors in these sites. This study intends to augment the current literature by examining incidence of these tumors on a national level. METHODS: Data from central cancer registries in the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programs for 2004-2007 (covering 99.2% of US population) and 1999-2007 (covering 89.4% of US population) were analyzed. Analyses for diagnosis years 2004-2007 included cases of malignant and nonmalignant primary spinal cord, spinal meninges, and cauda equina tumors. Descriptive statistics including estimated age-adjusted incidence rates standardized to the 2000 US standard population were conducted for both malignant and nonmalignant primary spinal tumors from cases diagnosed during 2004-2007 as well as trend analyses on malignant cases of primary spinal tumors (n = 5103) for cases diagnosed during 1999-2007 using SEER*Stat 6.6.2 software. RESULTS: There were 2576 cases of malignant primary spinal tumors and 9136 cases of nonmalignant primary spinal tumors in 2004-2007. The incidence of malignant and nonmalignant primary spinal tumors combined differed by age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Results of trend analyses indicated that malignant primary spinal tumors have been stable throughout the 1999-2007 period. CONCLUSIONS: This large population-based study adds new insights into the descriptive epidemiology of primary spinal cord, spinal meninges, and cauda equina tumors by providing in-depth analyses of the incidence of these tumors on a national level. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We describe the neuropathologic procedure utilized in the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN), focusing on the examination of central nervous system (CNS) in stillbirth (SB). The SCRN was organized to perform a case-control study to determine the scope and causes of SB. Pathologists at all the participating centers agreed on and used the same standardized neuropathologic techniques. Standardized sections were taken and detailed data were collected. Fresh brain tissue was saved for investigative purposes. A total of 663 women with SB were enrolled into the case-control study: 620 delivered a single stillborn, 42 delivered twins, and 1 delivered triplets. Of the 560 (84.5%) who consented to postmortem examination, 465 (70.1%) also gave consent to the examination of the CNS. In the 440 stillborn infants in whom CNS examination was possible, 248 (56.4%) of the brains were intact, 72 were fragmented (16.4%), and 120 (27.3%) were liquefied. In summary, this is the largest prospective study dedicated to investigate the causes of SB and collect essential information and biological samples in the United States. A protocol for neuropathologic examination was instituted, and a brain tissue repository was created to provide samples and related data for future investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous coronary revascularization, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and medical management are nowadays very effective in treating coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, the number of patients affected by refractory chronic angina pectoris is increasing. Epidemiological estimates for refractory angina pectoris predict the diagnosis of more than 100,000 patients each year in the USA and approximately 50,000 in Europe. Spinal cord stimulation is a valuable therapeutic option for patients who have failed multiple percutaneous and surgical revascularizations and who are not eligible for further revascularization procedures. The aim of this study is to assess the benefits, in terms of quality of life, of spinal cord stimulation in no-option patients affected by refractory angina pectoris. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design:Prospective, randomized, in vivo acute spinal cord injury in pigs.Setting:Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.Objectives:To determine whether postinjury methylprednisolone could reduce the generation of known mediators of secondary neurological injury.Methods:Intrathecal microdialysis probes were used to sample cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for measurement of PGE2, glutamate, and citrulline (a byproduct of nitric oxide generation), before and after spinal cord injury in anesthetized pigs. The spinal cord was removed at the end of the study for measurement of myeloperoxidase and methylprednisolone concentrations. Animals were randomly allocated to receive intravenous methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg bolus then 3.4 mg/kg/h), intrathecal methylprednisolone (5 mg bolus then 5 mg/h), or saline, beginning 30 min after the spinal cord was injured by using a modification of the Allen weight drop technique.Results:Spinal cord injury significantly increased the amount of glutamate, PGE2, myeloperoxidase, and citrulline, recovered from the CSF dialysates. However, neither intravenous nor intrathecal methylprednisolone administered after injury had any effect on the magnitude of the increase in any of the measured biochemicals. Intrathecal methylprednisolone administration produced a spinal cord methylprednisolone concentration that was eight times greater, and a plasma concentration that was 32 times less, than that achieved with intravenous administration.Conclusions:Contrary to earlier animal studies in which methylprednisolone was administered either before or immediately after spinal cord injury, we found no effect of intravenous or intrathecal methylprednisolone on any of the parameters measured when administered 30 min postinjury.Spinal Cord (2006) 44, 594–604. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101891; published online 24 January 2006 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article examines the testosterone levels among men with spinal cord injury (SCI) admitted to inpatient rehabilitation in the U.S. SCI is associated with changes in endocrine function of the male reproductive system, including changes in the secretion of hormones such as luteinizing hormones and testosterone. A number of studies have demonstrated that men with SCI often have low levels of total testosterone and would likely have negative effect on rehabilitation outcomes among patients with the condition.

Study design:Cross-sectional analysis of a convenience sample of locally recruited participants, including both patients and volunteers.Objectives:To determine whether there is an association between plasma homocysteine and hypertension in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:Spinal Cord Injury Service of the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Medical Center (California, United States of America).Methods:The incidence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and the presence of metabolic syndrome were determined in 168 individuals with SCI (mean age 50.2±12.8 years). Fasting lipids, insulin, glucose, plasma homocysteine, and anthropometric data was gathered for each subject.Results:Blood pressure values (P<0.001) and mean arterial pressure (P<0.05) increased with higher plasma homocysteine levels. Homocysteine values were also significantly greater among individuals with hypertension compared with those who were normotensive or prehypertensive (P<0.0001). There was an inverse relationship between plasma homocysteine levels and glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow (P<0.05).Conclusions:Plasma homocysteine levels are elevated in persons with SCI who have hypertension and inversely related to renal function, which suggests that renal dysfunction may be a link between homocysteine and hypertension in persons with SCI.Sponsorship:Funded by the VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Merit Review Grant #B2549R.Spinal Cord (2006) 44, 474–479. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101873; published online 6 December 2005 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design:Systematic review.Objective:To review sexuality in persons with spinal cord injuries (SCIs), and to report the effectiveness of erectile interventions.Methods:Reports from six databases (1966–2003), selected annual proceedings (1997–2002) and manufacturer's information were screened against eligibility criteria. Included reports were abstracted and data pooled from case-series reports regarding intracavernous injections and sildenafil.Results:From 2127 unique reports evaluated, 49 were included. Male sexual dysfunction was addressed in these reports of several interventions (behavioural therapy, topical agents, intraurethral alprosatadil, intracavernous injections, vacuum tumescence devices, penile implants, sacral stimulators and oral medication). Penile injections resulted in successful erectile function in 90% (95% CI: 83%, 97%) of men. Sildenafil resulted in 79% (95% CI: 68%, 90%) success; the difference in efficacy was not statistically significant. Five case-series reports involving 363 participants with penile implants demonstrated a high satisfaction rate, but a 10% complication rate.Conclusions:A large body of evidence addressing sexuality in males focuses on erection. Penile injection, sildenafil and vacuum devices generally obviate the need for penile implants to address erectile dysfunction. Interventions may positively affect sexual activity in the short term. Long-term sexual adjustment and holistic approaches beyond erections remain to be studied. Rigorous study design and reporting, using common outcome measures, will facilitate higher quality research. This will positively impact patient care.Sponsorship:Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2101 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.Spinal Cord (2006) 44, 465–473. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101880; published online 29 November 2005 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]