Search

Background Patients with advanced esophageal cancer carry poor prognoses; limited data exist to guide second-line therapy in the metastatic setting. Paclitaxel has been used yet is associated with limited efficacy. There is preclinical evidence of synergy between paclitaxel and cixutumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor. We conducted a randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel (arm A) versus paclitaxel plus cixutumumab (arm B) in the second-line for patients with metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers. Methods The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); 87 patients (43 in arm A, 44 in arm B) were treated. Results Median PFS was 2.6 months in arm A [90% CL 1.8-3.5] and 2.3 months in arm B [90% 2.0-3.5], P = .86. Stable disease was observed in 29 (33%) patients. Objective response rates for Arms A and B were 12% [90% CI, 5-23%] and 14% [90% CI, 6-25%]. Median overall survival was 6.7 months [90% CL 4.9-9.5] in arm A and 7.2 months [90% CL 4.9-8.1] in arm B, P = 56. Conclusion The addition of cixutumumab to paclitaxel in second-line therapy of metastatic esophageal/GEJ cancer was well tolerated but did not improve clinical outcomes relative to standard of care (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01142388).

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over 95% of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are typically classified based on anatomic location and histologic type. Gastric cancer generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with localized gastric cancer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on the management of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.

PDF file - 30K, Estimated maximal concentration (Cmax) and total area under the concentration-time curve (AUClast) of total and free oxaliplatin with and without vismodegib

PDF file - 25K, A comparison of steady-state 5-FU concentrations with and without vismodegib co-treatment

PDF file - 33K, Estimated maximal concentration (Cmax) and total area under the concentration-time curve (AUClast) of irinotecan (and metabolites SN-38 and SN-38G) with and without vismodegib

PDF file - 25K, A comparison of serum concentrations of bevacizumab with and without vismodegib co-treatment

PDF file - 57K, A summary of primer/probes used for qRT-PCR profiling of Hh pathway genes

Purpose: Vismodegib, a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, has preclinical activity in colorectal cancer (CRC) models. This trial assessed the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of adding vismodegib to first-line treatment for metastatic CRC (mCRC).Experimental design: Patients were randomized to receive vismodegib (150 mg/day orally) or placebo, in combination with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) every 2 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary objectives included evaluation of predictive biomarkers and pharmacokinetic drug interactions.Results: A total of 199 patients with mCRC were treated on protocol (124 FOLFOX, 75 FOLFIRI). The median PFS hazard ratio (HR) for vismodegib treatment compared with placebo was 1.25 (90% CI: 0.89–1.76; P = 0.28). The overall response rates for placebo-treated and vismodegib-treated patients were 51% (90% CI: 43–60) and 46% (90% CI: 37–55), respectively. No vismodegib-associated benefit was observed in combination with either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI. Increased tumor tissue Hedgehog expression did not predict clinical benefit. Grade 3 to 5 adverse events reported for more than 5% of patients that occurred more frequently in the vismodegib-treated group were fatigue, nausea, asthenia, mucositis, peripheral sensory neuropathy, weight loss, decreased appetite, and dehydration. Vismodegib did not alter the pharmacokinetics of FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or bevacizumab.Conclusions: Vismodegib does not add to the efficacy of standard therapy for mCRC. Compared with placebo, treatment intensity was lower for all regimen components in vismodegib-treated patients, suggesting that combined toxicity may have contributed to lack of efficacy. Clin Cancer Res; 19(1); 258–67. ©2012 AACR.

PDF file - 24K, A comparison of vismodegib steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) between patients receiving FOLFOX and FOLFIRI

PDF file - 61K

PURPOSE To study the impact of transarterial Yttrium-90 radioembolization (TARE) in combination with second-line systemic chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS In this international, multicenter, open-label phase III trial, patients with CLM who progressed on oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based first-line therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive second-line chemotherapy with or without TARE. The two primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatic PFS (hPFS), assessed by blinded independent central review. Random assignment was performed using a web- or voice-based system stratified by unilobar or bilobar disease, oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based first-line chemotherapy, and KRAS mutation status. RESULTS Four hundred twenty-eight patients from 95 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia were randomly assigned to chemotherapy with or without TARE; this represents the intention-to-treat population and included 215 patients in the TARE plus chemotherapy group and 213 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88; 1-sided P = .0013), with a median PFS of 8.0 (95% CI, 7.2 to 9.2) and 7.2 (95% CI, 5.7 to 7.6) months, respectively. The HR for hPFS was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.77; 1-sided P < .0001), with a median hPFS of 9.1 (95% CI, 7.8 to 9.7) and 7.2 (95% CI, 5.7 to 7.6) months, respectively. Objective response rates were 34.0% (95% CI, 28.0 to 40.5) and 21.1% (95% CI, 16.2 to 27.1; 1-sided P = .0019) for the TARE and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Median overall survival was 14.0 (95% CI, 11.8 to 15.5) and 14.4 months (95% CI, 12.8 to 16.4; 1-sided P = .7229) with a HR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.32) for TARE and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Grade 3 adverse events were reported more frequently with TARE (68.4% v 49.3%). Both groups received full chemotherapy dose intensity. CONCLUSION The addition of TARE to systemic therapy for second-line CLM led to longer PFS and hPFS. Further subset analyses are needed to better define the ideal patient population that would benefit from TARE.

COVID-19 has resulted in significant disruptions in cancer care. The Illinois Cancer Collaborative (ILCC), a statewide multidisciplinary cancer collaborative, has developed expert recommendations for triage and management of colorectal cancer when disruptions occur in usual care. Such recommendations would be applicable to future outbreaks of COVID-19 or other large-scale disruptions in cancer care.

Gastrointestinal malignancies, though uncommon in pregnancy, present several unique challenges with regards to diagnosis, staging, and treatment. Imaging the pregnant patient with a suspected or confirmed GI malignancy requires modifications to the radiologic modality of choice and protocol in order to minimize harm to the fetus, ensure accuracy in diagnosis and staging and guide treatment decisions. In this review article, we discuss the imaging approach to the pregnant patient with GI cancer, including safe radiologic modalities and modifications to imaging protocols. We also review the most common GI cancers encountered in pregnancy, including colorectal, pancreatic, gastric, and small bowel tumors, with emphasis to imaging findings, staging, and treatment considerations.

This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Rectal Cancer focuses on management of malignant polyps and resectable nonmetastatic rectal cancer because important updates have been made to these guidelines. These recent updates include redrawing the algorithms for stage II and III disease to reflect new data supporting the increasingly prominent role of total neoadjuvant therapy, expanded recommendations for short-course radiation therapy techniques, and new recommendations for a “watch-and-wait” nonoperative management technique for patients with cancer that shows a complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Rectal Cancer, available online at NCCN.org, covers additional topics including risk assessment, pathology and staging, management of metastatic disease, posttreatment surveillance, treatment of recurrent disease, and survivorship.

For the treatment of gastric and esophageal cancers, several pivotal trials—especially those evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)—have altered the treatment landscape and led to changes in the NCCN Guidelines. In addition to pembrolizumab and nivolumab, new treatment options include trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd), ramucirumab, and trifluridine/tipiracil. These agents convey varying degrees of benefit depending on treatment line, PD-L1 expression, HER2 expression, and tumor histology. Recently, ICIs have been incorporated into the first-line treatment of HER2-negative advanced esophageal, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and gastric cancers, in addition to second-line treatment of advanced esophageal and GEJ cancer of squamous histology. T-DXd is another new second-line option for HER2-positive esophageal, GEJ, and gastric adenocarcinomas. ICIs are now moving into the adjuvant setting as well, and a new recommendation is nivolumab use after preoperative chemoradiation and surgery in patients who have residual disease identified at the time of their R0 resections.

PURPOSE Antitumor activity in preclinical models and a phase I study of patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DD-LPS) was observed with selinexor. We evaluated the clinical benefit of selinexor in patients with previously treated DD-LPS whose sarcoma progressed on approved agents. METHODS SEAL was a phase II-III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients age 12 years or older with advanced DD-LPS who had received two-five lines of therapy were randomly assigned (2:1) to selinexor (60 mg) or placebo twice weekly in 6-week cycles (crossover permitted). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included for safety analysis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02606461 ). RESULTS Two hundred eighty-five patients were enrolled (selinexor, n = 188; placebo, n = 97). PFS was significantly longer with selinexor versus placebo: hazard ratio (HR) 0.70 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.95; one-sided P = .011; medians 2.8 v 2.1 months), as was time to next treatment: HR 0.50 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.66; one-sided P < .0001; medians 5.8 v 3.2 months). With crossover, no difference was observed in overall survival. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade versus grade 3 or 4 with selinexor were nausea (151 [80.7%] v 11 [5.9]), decreased appetite (113 [60.4%] v 14 [7.5%]), and fatigue (96 [51.3%] v 12 [6.4%]). Four (2.1%) and three (3.1%) patients died in the selinexor and placebo arms, respectively. Exploratory RNA sequencing analysis identified that the absence of CALB1 expression was associated with longer PFS with selinexor compared with placebo (median 6.9 v 2.2 months; HR, 0.19; P = .001). CONCLUSION Patients with advanced, refractory DD-LPS showed improved PFS and time to next treatment with selinexor compared with placebo. Supportive care and dose reductions mitigated side effects of selinexor. Prospective validation of CALB1 expression as a predictive biomarker for selinexor in DD-LPS is warranted.

The first confirmed case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States was reported on January 20, 2020. As of September 17, 2020, there were more than 6.6 million confirmed cases and 196,277 deaths. Limited data are available on outcomes of immunocompromised patients, but early published reports from China indicate that those with cancer have a 3.5 times higher risk of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, or death than those without cancer. Because of the uncertain behavior of COVID-19, it has become imperative for practices to limit exposure to vulnerable patients. Telemedicine has been one of the cornerstones of caring for patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review provides an overview of reimbursement policy by public and private payers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, describes implications in cancer care, and offers considerations for future reimbursement policy.

This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Colon Cancer focuses on systemic therapy options for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), because important updates have recently been made to this section. These updates include recommendations for first-line use of checkpoint inhibitors for mCRC, that is deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high, recommendations related to the use of biosimilars, and expanded recommendations for biomarker testing. The systemic therapy recommendations now include targeted therapy options for patients with mCRC that is HER2-amplified, or BRAF V600E mutation–positive. Treatment and management of nonmetastatic or resectable/ablatable metastatic disease are discussed in the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer available at NCCN.org. Additional topics covered in the complete version include risk assessment, staging, pathology, posttreatment surveillance, and survivorship.

The NCCN Guidelines for Rectal Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of patients with rectal cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines. These updates include clarifying the definition of rectum and differentiating the rectum from the sigmoid colon; the total neoadjuvant therapy approach for localized rectal cancer; and biomarker-targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, with a focus on new treatment options for patients with BRAF V600E– or HER2 amplification–positive disease.

Summary Background Data on patients with COVID-19 who have cancer are lacking. Here we characterise the outcomes of a cohort of patients with cancer and COVID-19 and identify potential prognostic factors for mortality and severe illness. Methods In this cohort study, we collected de-identified data on patients with active or previous malignancy, aged 18 years and older, with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection from the USA, Canada, and Spain from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) database for whom baseline data were added between March 17 and April 16, 2020. We collected data on baseline clinical conditions, medications, cancer diagnosis and treatment, and COVID-19 disease course. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 30 days of diagnosis of COVID-19. We assessed the association between the outcome and potential prognostic variables using logistic regression analyses, partially adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, and obesity. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701, and is ongoing. Findings Of 1035 records entered into the CCC19 database during the study period, 928 patients met inclusion criteria for our analysis. Median age was 66 years (IQR 57–76), 279 (30%) were aged 75 years or older, and 468 (50%) patients were male. The most prevalent malignancies were breast (191 [21%]) and prostate (152 [16%]). 366 (39%) patients were on active anticancer treatment, and 396 (43%) had active (measurable) cancer. At analysis (May 7, 2020), 121 (13%) patients had died. In logistic regression analysis, independent factors associated with increased 30-day mortality, after partial adjustment, were: increased age (per 10 years; partially adjusted odds ratio 1·84, 95% CI 1·53–2·21), male sex (1·63, 1·07–2·48), smoking status (former smoker vs never smoked: 1·60, 1·03–2·47), number of comorbidities (two vs none: 4·50, 1·33–15·28), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or higher (status of 2 vs 0 or 1: 3·89, 2·11–7·18), active cancer (progressing vs remission: 5·20, 2·77–9·77), and receipt of azithromycin plus hydroxychloroquine (vs treatment with neither: 2·93, 1·79–4·79; confounding by indication cannot be excluded). Compared with residence in the US-Northeast, residence in Canada (0·24, 0·07–0·84) or the US-Midwest (0·50, 0·28–0·90) were associated with decreased 30-day all-cause mortality. Race and ethnicity, obesity status, cancer type, type of anticancer therapy, and recent surgery were not associated with mortality. Interpretation Among patients with cancer and COVID-19, 30-day all-cause mortality was high and associated with general risk factors and risk factors unique to patients with cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to better understand the effect of COVID-19 on outcomes in patients with cancer, including the ability to continue specific cancer treatments. Funding American Cancer Society, National Institutes of Health, and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research.

Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains resistant to chemotherapy and immunotherapy individually because of its desmoplastic stroma and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Synergizing cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) immune checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy could overcome these barriers. Here we present results of a phase Ib trial combining ipilimumab and gemcitabine in advanced PDAC. Materials and Methods This was a single-institution study with a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included determining the toxicity profile, objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Twenty-one patients were enrolled, 13 during dose escalation and 8 at the MTD. The median age was 66 years, 62% were female, 95% had stage IV disease, and 67% had received at least one prior line of therapy. The primary objective to establish the MTD was achieved at doses of ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were anemia (48%), leukopenia (48%), and neutropenia (43%). The ORR was 14% (3/21), and seven patients had stable disease. Median response duration for the three responders was 11 months, with one response duration of 19.8 months. Median PFS was 2.78 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61–4.83 months), and median OS was 6.90 months (95% CI, 2.63–9.57 months). Conclusion Gemcitabine and ipilimumab is a safe and tolerable regimen for PDAC with a similar response rate to gemcitabine alone. As in other immunotherapy trials, responses were relatively durable in this study. Implications for Practice Gemcitabine and ipilimumab is a safe and feasible regimen for treating advanced pancreatic cancer. Although one patient in this study had a relatively durable response of nearly 20 months, adding ipilimumab to gemcitabine does not appear to be more effective than gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract that has increased in incidence across recent years. Often diagnosed at an advanced stage, outcomes for SBA are worse on average than for other related malignancies, including colorectal cancer. Due to the rarity of this disease, few studies have been done to direct optimal treatment, although recent data have shown that SBA responds to treatment differently than colorectal cancer, necessitating a separate approach to treatment. The NCCN Guidelines for Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma were created to establish an evidence-based standard of care for patients with SBA. These guidelines provide recommendations on the workup of suspected SBA, primary treatment options, adjuvant treatment, surveillance, and systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Additionally, principles of imaging and endoscopy, pathologic review, surgery, radiation therapy, and survivorship are described.

Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histology in Eastern Europe and Asia, and adenocarcinoma is most common in North America and Western Europe. Surgery is a major component of treatment of locally advanced resectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer, and randomized trials have shown that the addition of preoperative chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy to surgery significantly improves survival. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, ramucirumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with esophageal and EGJ cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers focuses on recommendations for the management of locally advanced and metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and EGJ.

Objectives: To investigate rates of ‘any’ and ‘predominant’ breastfeeding in hospital among Indigenous and non-Indigenous women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods: A retrospective study of singleton infants born from July 2007 to December 2010 at Cairns Hospital, Australia, following GDM pregnancy, using linked hospital and birth data (n=617 infants), with a subsample of medical record reviews (n=365 infants). Aggregate data were used to compare to breastfeeding rates among infants born following non-GDM pregnancy (n=7,894 infants). Results: More than 90% of all women reported any breastfeeding before hospital discharge. About 80% of women without GDM reported predominant breastfeeding. Despite significant increases over time (p

When the COVID-19 pandemic began, formal frameworks to collect data about affected patients were lacking. The COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) was formed to collect granular data on patients with cancer and COVID-19 at scale and as rapidly as possible. CCC19 has grown from five initial institutions to 125 institutions with >400 collaborators. More than 5,000 cases with complete baseline data have been accrued. Future directions include increased electronic health record integration for direct data ingestion, expansion to additional domestic and international sites, more intentional patient involvement, and granular analyses of still-unanswered questions related to cancer subtypes and treatments.

Background VT1021, a cyclic pentapeptide, reprograms myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and induces the production of thrombospondin-1 (Tsp-1) in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Tsp-1, via binding to CD36 and CD47, induces apoptosis in tumor and endothelial cells, blocks the ‘do-not-eat-me’ signal, increases the M1:M2 macrophage ratio and activates cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). Preclinical studies showed robust anti-tumor activities of VT1021 in multiple animal models. Methods This is a first-in-human, Ph 1/2, open-label, multicenter dose escalation and expansion study in advanced solid tumors. The primary objectives are to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and characterize the safety and tolerability of VT1021. Secondary objectives are to characterize the adverse event (AE) profile, evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), and describe preliminary efficacy. Exploratory objectives include evaluation of pharmacodynamic effects of VT1021 in tumor, TME, and peripheral blood. The expansion phase focuses on ovarian, pancreatic, triple negative breast cancer, glioblastoma, and a basket cohort with high CD36-expressing tumors. Results In the escalation phase, 46 subjects received between 0.5–15.6 mg/kg of VT1021 by IV infusion twice weekly. VT1021 has been well tolerated through all doses tested. One patient dosed at 1.0 mg/kg developed a grade 3 infusion reaction and 3 patients dosed at 1.0, 6.6, and 8.8 mg/kg respectively developed grade 2 infusion reactions. Other drug related AEs included grade 1–2 fatigue (n=7), nausea (n=4), constipation (n=2), increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=2) and blood bilirubin (n=2), hypomagnesaemia (n=2), and dizziness (n=2). Dose proportionality was observed in PK analysis. Among 28 evaluable subjects, one partial response (thymoma, 372+ days on treatment) and 11 stable disease (SD) in 9 different solid tumors have been observed for a disease control rate of 43%. Seven of eleven SDs had high CD36 AND high CD47 expression with an average duration of 162 days on study. VT1021 induced Tsp-1 production in peripheral blood cells at most dose levels. In addition, on-study biopsies exhibited increased Tsp-1 expression in the TME by activation of p53 in MDSCs, increased CTL infiltration, increased M1:M2 macrophage ratio, and reduced regulatory T cells in the TME. The RP2D was declared to be 11.8 mg/kg and enrollment in tumor-specific expansions is on-going. Conclusions Through all doses tested, VT1021 was safe and well tolerated, with dose proportional PK properties. In addition, VT1021 has demonstrated activities in reprogramming the TME which resulted in a high disease control rate in subjects with tumors expressing both high CD36 and high CD47. Trial Registration NCT03364400 Ethics Approval The study was approved by Northwestern University Medical School institutional review board (IRB), approval number 00000418, Horizon Oncology Center IRB, approval number 00001313, South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutic IRB, approval number 00003657, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center IRB, approval number 00006075, Cleveland Clinic IRB, approval number 00000536, Florida Cancer Specialists IRB, approval number 00006075, Case Western IRB, approval number 00000536, Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute IRB, approval number 00000753 and MD Anderson IRB, approval number 00006023.

The NCCN Guidelines for Rectal Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of patients with rectal cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines. These updates include clarifying the definition of rectum and differentiating the rectum from the sigmoid colon; the total neoadjuvant therapy approach for localized rectal cancer; and biomarker-targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, with a focus on new treatment options for patients with BRAF V600E- or HER2 amplification-positive disease.

To investigate laboratory parameters as predictors of overall survival (OS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with radioembolization and develop/validate a scoring system.With IRB approval, we included all patients with baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) 100 ng/dL from our prospectively acquired HCC radioembolization database. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI), and AFP were measured at baseline and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month post-radioembolization Landmarks. OS was assessed from these Landmarks. Univariate/multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate OS predictability of these parameters. Baseline Imaging, Laboratory, and Combination scoring systems were developed. Developing/validating groups were created to investigate/validate the score's OS predictability. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were evaluated. Patients were stratified into groups I, II, and III by using 25th and 75th percentile cutoffs according to change in Laboratory Score from baseline.345/401 (86%), 238/401 (59%), and 167/401 (42%) patients had laboratory parameters available at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month Landmarks, respectively. ALBI and AFP were significant OS prognosticators at all Landmarks. The Laboratory Score [ALBI + (0.3 × LnAFP)] was developed/internally validated to predict OS from these Landmarks. Areas under the curve of time-dependent ROCs of the Baseline Imaging vs. Laboratory scores in predicting patient OS post 3 and 6 months Landmarks were 0.56 versus 0.82 and 0.57 versus 0.77, respectively. OS differences in groups I, II, and III according to change in Laboratory Score from baseline were significant (p 0.001).Post-radioembolization AFP and ALBI scores were significant OS prognosticators. A decrease in post-therapeutic Laboratory Score, which combines AFP and ALBI, correlates with an improved OS.

The NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer provide recommendations regarding diagnosis, pathologic staging, surgical management, perioperative treatment, surveillance, management of recurrent and metastatic disease, and survivorship. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the NCCN Colon Cancer Panel discussions for the 2018 update of the guidelines regarding risk stratification and adjuvant treatment for patients with stage III colon cancer, and treatment of BRAF V600E mutation-positive metastatic colorectal cancer with regimens containing vemurafenib.

Despite significant advances in standard of care therapies, the 5-year survival rate for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remains around 12%. Immunotherapy has not provided the stellar advances in colorectal cancer that has been seen in other malignancies. Immunotherapy appears to play a pivotal role in microsatellite unstable CRC tumors where the response rates are profound. These results have led to FDA approval of pembrolizumab for MSI-H CRC tumors. Additional research into several new immune agents including IDO inhibitors, vaccine therapy and combinatorial agents are being evaluated for CRC. This review will provide an overview of the approaches currently being investigated.

BackgroundOne barrier to treating pancreatic cancer is the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). VT1021 is a cyclic peptide derived from prosaposin and stimulates thrombospondin-1 (Tsp-1) production in myeloid derived suppressor cells. Tsp-1 binds to CD36 on macrophages to convert M2 macrophages to anti-tumorigenic M1 macrophages; on tumor cells to induce apoptosis; and increases the CD8+/Treg ratio. Tsp-1 also binds to CD47 on tumor cells to block the ”do not eat me signal”. In a recently completed phase I/II clinical study (NCT03364400), VT1021 had no major adverse events and a predictable pharmacokinetic profile.MethodsTo evaluate potential predictive biomarkers of VT1021, CD36/CD47 levels were analyzed on pre-treatment biopsy samples and on-study tumor biopsies collected during the treatment using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Samples were stained and scored by software-based image analysis and manual review (figure 1). Induction of Tsp-1 in circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by ELISA was correlated with Tsp-1 induction in on-study biopsy samples via IHC, and with clinical responses. To be considered ”evaluable”, subjects completed ≥1 cycle of VT1021 treatment and tumor imaging during cycle 2.ResultsIn the pancreatic cancer expansion study, 21 of 32 enrolled subjects (66%) had dual high (DH) expression of CD36/CD47. There were 5 subjects with stable diseases among 15 evaluable subjects with disease control rate of 33%. Of the 13 subjects with measurable disease, all 5 subjects with reduction of tumor burden were DH CD36/CD47 and remained on study for an average of 105 days. Moreover, paired tumor biopsies revealed increased Tsp-1 expression, CTL infiltration and M1:M2 ratio among subjects that obtained disease control with DH baseline CD36/CD47 expression.To identify other solid tumor indications that could benefit from VT1021 treatment based on CD36/CD47 expression, commercially available tumor tissue microarrays from 16 different indications were evaluated. Several indications demonstrated high percentage of DH CD36/CD47, including gastric (59%), head and neck (57%), and pancreatic cancers (56%).Abstract 369 Figure 1Expression intensities of CD36/CD47 in subjects with pancreatic cancerConclusionsPancreatic cancer subjects who were DH for CD36/CD47 were more likely to have a reduction in tumor burden and stay on study longer than non-DH subjects. Increased Tsp-1 induction in circulating PBMCs and in the TME was confirmed. Remodeling of the TME by VT1021 to be more immune sensitive via CTL and M1 accumulation was demonstrated. Based on these findings, the DH expression of CD36/CD47 could be a useful predictive biomarker to stratify subjects for inclusion in future trials in pancreatic cancer, and in other solid tumor indications.Trial RegistrationTrial RegistrationNCT03364400

Background The authors hypothesized that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who had tumors with low thymidylate synthase (TS-L) expression would have a higher response rate to combined 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) plus bevacizumab (FOLFOX/Bev) than those with high TS (TS-H) expression and that combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IROX) plus bevacizumab (IROX/Bev) would be more effective than FOLFOX/Bev in those with TS-H tumors. Methods TS protein expression was determined in mCRC tissue. Patients who had TS-L tumors received FOLFOX/Bev, and those who had TS-H tumors were randomly assigned to receive either FOLFOX/Bev or IROX/Bev. The primary endpoint was the response rate (complete plus partial responses). Results In total, 211 of 247 patients (70% TS-H) were registered to the treatment phase. Efficacy analyses included eligible patients who had started treatment (N = 186). The response rates for patients who received IROX/Bev (TS-H), FOLFOX/Bev (TS-H), and FOLFOX/Bev (TS-L) were 33%, 38%, and 49%, respectively (P = nonsignificant). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9-12 months; 10 months in the IROX/Bev TS-H group, 9 months in the FOLFOX/Bev TS-H group, and 13 months in the FOLFOX/Bev TS-L group). The TS-L group had improved PFS compared with the TS-H group that received FOLFOX/Bev (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0%-2.4%; P = .04; Cox regression). The median overall survival (OS) was 22 months (95% CI, 20 29 months; 18 months in the IROX/Bev TS-H group, 21 months in the FOLFOX/Bev TS-H group, and 32 months in the TS-L group). OS comparisons for the 2 TS-H arms and for the FOLFOX/Bev TS-H versus TS-L arms were not significantly different. Conclusions TS expression was prognostic: Patients with TS-L tumors who received FOLFOX/Bev had a longer PFS than those with TS-H tumors, along with a trend toward longer OS. Patients with TS-H tumors did not benefit more from IROX/Bev than from FOLFOX/Bev. Cancer 2018;124:688-97. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Summary Background Further optimisation of present standard chemoradiation is needed in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Veliparib, an oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has been shown to enhance the antitumour activity of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in preclinical models. We aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose and establish the recommended phase 2 dose of veliparib combined with neoadjuvant capecitabine and radiotherapy. Methods This phase 1b, open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation study was done at six hospitals (one in Australia and five in the USA). Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or more and were newly diagnosed with stage II to III locally advanced, resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum with a distal tumour border of less than 12 cm from anal verge. Patients were ineligible if they had received anticancer therapy or surgery (except colostomy or ileostomy) 28 days or less before the first dose of study drug, previous pelvic radiotherapy, or previous treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Enrolled patients received capecitabine (825 mg/m 2 orally twice daily) with radiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions daily, approximately 5 days consecutively per week for about 5·5 weeks). Veliparib (20–400 mg orally twice daily) was administered daily starting on day 2 of week 1 and continuing until 2 days after radiotherapy completion. Patients underwent total mesorectal excision 5–10 weeks after radiotherapy completion. The primary objectives were to establish the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose of veliparib plus capecitabine and radiotherapy, with an exposure-adjusted continual reassessment methodology. Efficacy and safety analyses were done per protocol. The reported study has completed accrual and all analyses are final. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01589419. Findings Between June 12, 2012, and Jan 13, 2015, 32 patients received veliparib (22 in the dose-escalation group; ten in the safety expansion group); 31 were assessable for efficacy ( Interpretation Veliparib plus capecitabine and radiotherapy had an acceptable safety profile and showed a dose-proportional pharmacokinetic profile with no effect on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine. Preliminary antitumour activity warrants further evaluation. Funding AbbVie Inc.

PURPOSE: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been proposed to be tumorigenic; however, prior studies of the association between DM and survival are conflicting. The goal of this ancillary analysis of RTOG 9704, a randomized controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer, was to determine the prognostic effects of DM and insulin use on survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients from RTOG 9704 with available data on DM and insulin use were included. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and variable levels were compared using log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were created to assess the associations among DM, insulin use, and body mass index phenotypes on outcomes. RESULTS: Of 538 patients enrolled from 1998 to 2002, 238 patients were eligible with analyzable DM and insulin use data. Overall 34% of patients had DM and 66% did not. Of patients with DM, 64% had insulin-dependent DM, and 36% had non-insulin-dependent DM. On univariable analysis, neither DM nor insulin dependence were associated with OS or DFS (P > .05 for all). On multivariable analysis, neither DM, insulin use, nor body mass index were independently associated with OS or DFS. Nonwhite race (hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35–3.50; P = .0014), nodal involvement (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.24–2.45; P = .0015), and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19-9) ≥ 90 U/mL (HR, 3.61; 95% CI, 2.32–5.63; P < .001) were associated with decreased OS. Nonwhite race (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.05–2.63; P = .029) and CA19-9 ≥ 90 U/mL (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.85–4.40; P < .001) were associated with decreased DFS. CONCLUSIONS: DM and insulin use were not associated with OS or DFS in patients with pancreatic cancer in this study. Race, nodal involvement, and increased CA19-9 were significant predictors of outcomes. These data might apply to the more modern use of neoadjuvant therapies for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer.

Background The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy improved outcomes for patients with metastatic colon cancer. E5204 was designed to test whether the addition of bevacizumab to mFOLFOX6, following neoadjuvant chemoradiation and definitive surgery, could improve overall survival (OS) in patients with stage II/III adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Subjects, Materials, and Methods Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer who had completed neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation and had undergone complete resection were enrolled. Patients were randomized to mFOLFOX6 (Arm A) or mFOLFOX6 with bevacizumab (Arm B) administered every 2 weeks for 12 cycles. Results E5204 registered only 355 patients (17% of planned accrual goal) as it was terminated prematurely owing to poor accrual. At a median follow-up of 72 months, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival (88.3% vs. 83.7%) or 5-year disease-free survival (71.2% vs. 76.5%) between the two arms. The rate of treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) was 68.8% on Arm A and 70.7% on Arm B. Arm B had a higher proportion of patients who discontinued therapy early as a result of AEs and patient withdrawal than did Arm A (32.4% vs. 21.5%, p = .029).The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia, leukopenia, neuropathy, diarrhea (without prior colostomy), and fatigue. Conclusion At 17% of its planned accrual, E5204 did not meet its primary endpoint. The addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOX6 in the adjuvant setting did not significantly improve OS in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer. Implications for Practice At 17% of its planned accrual, E5204 was terminated early owing to poor accrual. At a median follow-up of 72 months, there was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (88.3% vs. 83.7%) or in 5-year disease-free survival (71.2% vs. 76.5%) between the two arms. Despite significant advances in the treatment of rectal cancer, especially in improving local control rates, the risk of distant metastases and the need to further improve quality of life remain a challenge. Strategies combining novel agents with chemoradiation to improve both distant and local control are needed.

BackgroundChemotherapy quality measures consider hospitals compliant when chemotherapy is recommended, even if it is not received. This may mask shortcomings in cancer care delivery. Objectives of this study were to (1) identify patient factors associated with failure to receive recommended chemotherapy without a documented contraindication and (2) assess hospital variation in failure to administer recommended chemotherapy.MethodsPatients from 2005 to 2015 with breast, colon and lung cancers who failed to receive recommended chemotherapy were identified using the National Cancer Database. Hospital-level rates of failure to administer recommended chemotherapy were calculated, and patient and hospital factors associated with failure to receive recommended chemotherapy were identified by multivariable logistic regression.ResultsA total of 183 148 patients at 1281 hospitals were analysed. Overall, 3.5% of patients with breast, 6.6% with colon and 10.7% with lung cancers failed to receive recommended chemotherapy. Patients were less likely to receive recommended chemotherapy in all cancers if uninsured or on Medicaid (pConclusions and relevanceThough overall rates are low, failure to receive recommended chemotherapy is associated with sociodemographic factors. Hospital variation in failure to administer recommended chemotherapy is masked by current quality measure definitions and may define a significant and unmeasured difference in hospital quality.

BACKGROUND Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting HER2 standardly administered with multi-agent chemotherapeutics in the 20-30% of metastatic gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas that overexpress HER2. Preclinical data shows that trastuzumab requires a functional adaptive immune system for efficacy, suggesting synergy of trastuzumab combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, cytotoxic chemotherapy facilitates tumor antigen presentation, and the combination of anti-PD-1 therapy and chemotherapy was recently found to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy alone in HER2-negative metastatic gastric cancer. We hypothesized that the addition of the anti-PD-L1 antibody avelumab to trastuzumab and FOLFOX chemotherapy would result in a greater response rate than expected with trastuzumab + FOLFOX alone in HER2-amplified gastroesophageal cancer. METHODS HCRN GI17-319 was a multicenter, single-arm, phase II clinical trial with a prespecified 6-subject safety run-in of avelumab, trastuzumab, and mFOLFOX6 in previously untreated, metastatic, HER2-amplified gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas (NCT03783936). The primary endpoint was best response rate within the first 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included PFS and adverse events (AEs). Subjects received 9 cycles of induction avelumab, trastuzumab, and mFOLFOX6 every 14 days, followed by maintenance avelumab + trastuzumab every 14 days. The study was initially designed as a Simon's two stage trial, but enrollment was stopped after the 18-subject first stage for reasons unrelated to safety or efficacy. RESULTS A total of 18 subjects, including the 6-subject safety run-in, were enrolled 4/2019-8/2020. The 24-week response rate was 11/18 (61%; 95% CI 39-84%), including one complete response. The confirmed overall response rate is 7/18 (39%), but 3 unconfirmed responders are still on treatment. With 11 progression events, median PFS was 8.0 mo (95% CI 4.2-11.9). The regimen was well tolerated, with most common treatment-related grade 3-4 AEs of decreased neutrophil count (28%), decreased platelet count (11%), anemia (11%), and hypokalemia (11%). CONCLUSIONS The combination of avelumab, trastuzumab, and FOLFOX chemotherapy demonstrated evidence of activity, and response rate and median PFS compared favorably to results expected with trastuzumab + chemotherapy from historical data. These outcomes corroborate with results from prior small studies of chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with HER2-amplified metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and demonstrate the exciting potential for addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this setting. Correlative studies from tumor specimens and peripheral blood collected on study are in progress. Citation Format: Michael S. Lee, Joseph Chao, Mary F. Mulcahy, Pashtoon M. Kasi, Angela T. Alistar, Sarbajit Mukherjee, Mehmet Akce, Dominic T. Moore, Cheryl A. Carlson, Autumn J. McRee. Phase II study of avelumab and trastuzumab with FOLFOX chemotherapy in previously untreated HER2-amplified metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT174.

e16183 Background: Significant advances have been made in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with the introduction of locoregional therapies including Theraspere, a treatment utilizing glass microspheres coated in radioactive yttrium-90 (Y-90). Hepatocyte exposure to Y-90 results in immunogenic cell death and tumor-specific immunity, suggesting this treatment may synergize with checkpoint inhibitor therapies to improve response rates and disease control. This abstract presents the results of combination therapy with Y-90 and NIVO in patients with advanced HCC. Methods: This study is a prospective, open-label, phase I clinical trial of NIVO plus Y-90. Eligible patients were diagnosed with advanced HCC (CP A6-B7) and were not transplant or resection candidates. Patients were treated with Y-90 following institutional procedures. The NIVO dose was escalated in a standard 3+3 format. Patients at DL1 began therapy 4 weeks after Y90 administration and received 80 mg of NIVO every two weeks. Patients at DL2 began therapy 2 weeks after Y90 administration and received 240 mg of NIVO every two weeks. The primary objective was to determine a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of NIVO in combination with Y-90 therapy. Secondary objectives included objective response rate (RECIST v1.1), toxicity evaluation, disease control rate and progression free survival. Results: Fifteen patients were registered to DL1, 8 received Y90 and 6 were eligible and received NIVO. Twelve patients were registered to DL2, 9 were eligible for Y90, 7 were eligible for NIVO and 6 completed therapy. Patients that did not complete therapy either withdrew consent, had a decline in performance status or a worsening in hepatic function. Fifty-nine percent of patients were male (N = 10), 82% were Caucasian (N = 14), 12% were Hispanic or Latino (N = 2) and 6% were African American (N = 1). Of the patients who received both Y90 and NIVO, 82% patients were CP B7. The MTD of NIVO is 240mg given 2 weeks after Y90. The disease control rate was 82% (N = 9/11 with stable disease). Forty-six percent of patients (N = 6) had a decrease in circulating levels of AFP, the most significant change was a decrease from 11,080 ng/mL to 260 ng/mL following cycle 2 of NIVO and normalization by cycle 4 of NIVO. The most common toxicities in both treatment groups were Grade 1-2 elevations in ALT/AST, frequency of these side effects was not higher than expected given this patient population. Conclusions: Therapy with Y-90 and NIVO in advanced HCC was tolerable and a maximum tolerated dose of NIVO was established. Combination therapy resulted in a clinical benefit rate of 82%, with 9 patients achieving stable disease. In a notably sick patient population with advanced CP scores this combination offered good disease control without increasing the adverse event rate. Study was stopped early due to lack of funding. Clinical trial information: NCT02837029.

4144 Background: Pelareorep is an intravenously delivered oncolytic reovirus that can induce a T-cell-inflamed phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In prior studies, tumor tissue analysis from patients treated with pelareorep shows pelareorep replication, increased T cell infiltration, and upregulation of PD-L1. We hypothesized that pelareorep in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with PDAC would lead to improved responses and anti-tumor immunological changes within peripheral blood and tumor biopsies in responding patients. Methods: PDAC patients who progressed after first-line treatment received pelareorep at a dose of 4.5x1010 TCID50 IV on Days 1, 2, 3 & 8 of Cycle (C) 1, and Days 1 & 8 with C2 onwards. Pembrolizumab was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle at 200 mg IV. The primary objective was overall response rate by RECIST v 1.1 criteria. Secondary objectives included evaluating immunological changes within tumor tissue and peripheral blood, performed by multi-plex immunohistochemistry and spectral flow cytometry (Cytek), respectively. Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled. Disease control was achieved in 33% of the 12 efficacy-evaluable patients. One patient achieved a partial response (PR). Three additional patients achieved stable disease (SD). On-treatment tumor biopsies, collected during C1, showed pelareorep replication, increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells and PD-L1+ cells, and decreased expression of VDAC1, a mitochondrial gatekeeper for tumor promotion, relative to archival tissue. Reduced infiltration of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) was observed in patients showing tumor response. Peripheral blood was collected at day 1 of each cycle and on C1 day 8. Relative to pretreatment samples, the number of CD8+ effector memory T cells and B cells tend to increase while the number of Treg cells declined in C2 onwards in patients with tumor response. Furthermore, these patients had increased expression of the mitochondrial protein TOMM20 in CD8+ T cells and decreased expression of PD-1 and the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark in Treg. Treatment was well tolerated with most treatment-related adverse events, including flu-like symptoms, being grade 1 or 2. Conclusions: The combination of pelareorep and pembrolizumab showed a manageable safety profile and modest efficacy in an unselected PDAC population. Additional correlation analyses between treatment efficacy and immunological changes will be presented. The anti-tumor activity of pelareorep and checkpoint blockade therapy is being evaluated further in additional ongoing studies. Clinical trial information: NCT03723915.

Purpose Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC) is characterized by high locoregional failure (LRF) rates after sphincter-preserving definitive chemoradiation (CRT) and is typically associated with anogenital human papilloma virus infection. Because cetuximab enhances the effect of radiation therapy in human papilloma virus–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, we hypothesized that adding cetuximab to CRT would reduce LRF in SCCAC. Methods Sixty-one patients with stage I to III SCCAC received CRT including cisplatin, fluorouracil, and radiation therapy to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (45 to 54 Gy) plus eight once-weekly doses of concurrent cetuximab. The study was designed to detect at least a 50% reduction in 3-year LRF rate (one-sided α, 0.10; power 90%), assuming a 35% LRF rate from historical data. Results Poor risk features included stage III disease in 64% and male sex in 20%. The 3-year LRF rate was 23% (95% CI, 13% to 36%; one-sided P = .03) by binomial proportional estimate using the prespecified end point and 21% (95% CI, 7% to 26%) by Kaplan-Meier estimate in a post hoc analysis using methods consistent with historical data. Three-year rates were 68% (95% CI, 55% to 79%) for progression-free survival and 83% (95% CI, 71% to 91%) for overall survival. Grade 4 toxicity occurred in 32%, and 5% had treatment-associated deaths. Conclusion Although the addition of cetuximab to chemoradiation for SCCAC was associated with lower LRF rates than historical data with CRT alone, toxicity was substantial, and LRF still occurs in approximately 20%, indicating the continued need for more effective and less toxic therapies.

Biliary tract cancer, or cholangiocarcinoma, arises from the biliary epithelium of the small ducts in the periphery of the liver (intrahepatic) and the main ducts of the hilum (extrahepatic), extending into the gallbladder. The incidence and epidemiology of biliary tract cancer are fluid and complex. It is shown that intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is on the rise in the Western world, and gallbladder cancer is on the decline. Radiation therapy has emerged as an important component of adjuvant therapy for resected disease and definitive therapy for locally advanced disease. The emerging sophisticated techniques of imaging tumors and conformal dose delivery are expanding the indications for radiotherapy in the management of bile duct tumors. As we understand more about the molecular pathways driving biliary tract cancers, targeted therapies are at the forefront of new therapeutic combinations. Understanding the gene expression profile and mutational burden in biliary tract cancer allows us to better discern the pathogenesis and identify promising new developmental therapeutic targets.

The purpose of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes and toxicity profile of hypofractionated conformal radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent full-dose gemcitabine versus standard fractionation RT with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of unresectable non-metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients with unresectable non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated at three institutions were included. All patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) consisting of either hypofractionated RT to the gross disease concurrent with a full-dose gemcitabine-based regimen versus standard fractionation RT to the tumor and elective nodes concurrent with 5-FU. End points included rates of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities, overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). From January 1999 to December 2009, 170 patients were identified (118 RT/gemcitabine, 52 RT/5-FU). There were no differences in demographic or clinical factors. Acute GI toxicities (grades

78 Background: Overexpression of the cell-cell adhesion protein P-cadherin has been associated with a more aggressive cancer cell phenotype, cancer stem cell properties, tumor invasion and metastasis. We determined the safety and recommended Phase II dose of the yttrium-labeled P-cadherin-targeted 90Y-FF-21101 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in patients (pts) with advanced tumors, and focused our expansion study in advanced colorectal (CRC) and pancreatic-biliary cancers (non-CRC tumors). We report the safety, efficacy, and correlative pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) in this cohort. Methods: Pts enrolled must have progressed on all standard therapies. 25 mCi/m2 (8 mCi/mg mAb) 90Y-FF-21101 was administered intravenously every 12 weeks (wks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Disease response was assessed based on RECIST v1.1 every 8 wks (1 cycle = 28 days). Serum mAb PK, existence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and tumor P-cadherin expression were also evaluated. Results: 31 pts [mean age 63 (range, 39-89); 14F/17M; median number of prior therapies, 3 (range, 1-11)] with CRC (18) and non-CRC tumors [pancreatic (8), cholangiocarcinoma (3), duodenal (2)] received a median of 1 (range, 1-2) dose of 90Y-FF-21101. Median duration on study was 8.1 (3.9 – 27) wks (CRC) and 8 (1.1-17.1) wks (pancreatic-biliary). Myelosuppression was the most common treatment-related adverse event [thrombocytopenia (87%; Grade (Gr) 3/4 in 45%), lymphopenia (74%; Gr 3/4 in 61%), anemia (52%; Gr 3/4 in 13%), leukopenia (32%; Gr 3/4 in 16%)], in addition to fatigue (68%, 1 Gr 3) and nausea (39%, 1 Gr 3). Three pts required dose reduction to 20 mCi/m2 with subsequent infusion after Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia [(pancreatic (2), CRC (1)]. The clinical benefit rate in pts with CRC based on stable disease (SD) for ≥8 wks is 43.8% (7/16 pts), with a median PFS of 8.1 wks and OS of 27 wks [median PFS, 7.9 wks; OS, 17.1 wks in non-CRC]. Longer-term SD was maintained in 2 pts with CRC for 17-24 wks; one continues on treatment. Enrollment is ongoing in the non-CRC cohort. FF-21101 has a mean t1/2 of approximately 65 hours, and post-treatment ADA titers have been observed in < 5% of pts. Tumor P-cadherin expression analysis by IHC demonstrated H-scores > 150 in 88% (14/16) of CRC pts, 75% (9/12) for non-CRC; 2 CRC pts with SD ≥17 wks had H-scores ≥190. Conclusions: 90Y-FF-21101 administered every 12 wks demonstrated expected toxicities and has been generally well-tolerated, with preliminary evidence of benefit demonstrated in heavily pre-treated pts with advanced CRC. The optimal dose and schedule for this radioimmunotherapeutic will continue to be explored, along with pre-treatment P-cadherin expression as a predictive biomarker for disease response. Clinical trial information: NCT02454010.

e16789 Background: Pelareorep is an intravenously delivered oncolytic reovirus that can induce a T-cell-inflamed phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Analysis of tumor tissue from patients treated with pelareorep have shown reovirus replication, T-cell infiltration, and upregulation of PD-L1. We hypothesized that pelareorep in combination pembrolizumab in patients with PDAC would lead to improved response, effective T-cell recognition of tumor antigens and expand peripheral T-cell repertoire. Methods: This investigator-initiated phase II study enrolled PDAC patients who progressed after first-line treatment. Patients received pelareorep at a dose of 4.5x1010TCID50IV on Days 1, 2, 3 & 8of Cycle (C) 1, and Days 1 & 8 with C2 onwards. Pembrolizumab was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle at 200 mg IV. Primary objective was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v 1.1 criteria. Secondary objectives included evaluation for reovirus replication and immune analysis in peripheral blood and tumor biopsies. The study was designed using Simon’s two-stage design with 90% power and one-sided alpha = 0.025 to compare 10% vs. 35% ORR. A total of ≥2/11 responses were needed to proceed to stage 2. Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled. Disease control was achieved in 30% of the 12 efficacy-evaluable patients. One patient achieved partial response. Three additional patients achieved stable disease. Treatment was well tolerated, with mostly grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events, including flu-like symptoms. Viral replication was observed in on-treatment tumor biopsies. T-cell receptor sequencing from peripheral blood revealed a high degree of peripheral repertoire turnover and creation of new T-cell clones during treatment. Immune correlation with efficacy analysis is ongoing. Conclusions: Pelareorep with pembrolizumab showed manageable safety profiles and modest efficacy in an unselected PDAC population. The study will not proceed to stage II, however further evaluation of anti-tumor activity of pelareorep and anti-PD-1 therapy is now planned in biomarker defined patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03723915 .

Purpose: National organizations encourage communication about costs of cancer care; however, few data are available on health system models for identifying and assisting patients with financial distress (FD). We report the feasibility and acceptability of a financial counseling (FC) intervention for patients who receive chemotherapy at a comprehensive cancer center. Materials and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to FC or standard care. The FC arm received education, financial assistance screening, and an estimation tool with total billed charges and out-of-pocket (OOP) cost of one cycle of chemotherapy from a financial counselor through phone call and in-person visit. Participants completed measures of FD, health-related quality of life, and acceptability. Results: Ninety-five participants enrolled (mean age, 61 years; 72% white; 50% commercially insured), with a 32% attrition rate between assessments. Rates of completion for the phone call, in-person, and entire intervention were 98%, 47%, and 30%, respectively. The OOP estimation tool was considered understandable and acceptable to the majority of participants. No significant changes in FD were found between arms. Emotional functioning was negatively associated with having high FD (95% CI, −0.13379 to −0.013; P = .0189). Being married was associated with a decrease in log-odds of having high FD (β = −1.916; 95% CI, −3.358 to −0.475; P = .0092). Conclusion: Implementation of an FC program that provides transparent cost data is feasible and acceptable. Incorporation of FC into clinical workflow, including phone counseling, is important to improve feasibility. Additional work is needed to develop tailored educational materials that are patient specific.

Background A standard approach to treating resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery; however, recurrence is common. To improve this, we designed a single-arm, phase II trial that added an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, cetuximab (C), to CRT, with the hypothesis that EGFR inhibition would improve pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Materials and Methods We aimed to increase the pCR rate from 25% to 45%. A Simon two-stage design (α and β of 0.10) required pCR/enrolled 5/18 for stage 1 and 14/40 total. CRT: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 days 1, 15, and 29; infusional 5-fluorouracil 180 mg/m2/24 hours × 35 days; C 400 mg/m2 day 1 then 250 mg/m2 days 8, 15, 22, and 29 and radiation (intensity modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] allowed) 180 cGy/day × 25 fractions (Monday through Friday). Following esophagectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT): weekly docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and C 250 mg/m2 5 out of 6 weeks for two cycles. Results Of 21 eligible patients enrolled, 17 had surgery; 4 died before operation (due to pulmonary embolism 4 days after CRT, G3 diarrhea, progressive disease during CRT, sepsis/hypoxia during CRT, and acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS]). pCR = 7/17. Three postoperative deaths due to ARDS resulted in seven total study-related deaths. Of the 14 remaining patients, 12 started and completed adjuvant CT. Two of seven patients with pCR died, both of ARDS. Out of the 21 eligible subjects in this study, 13 have died and 8 remain alive. The use of IMRT did not correlate with ARDS. Conclusion This regimen demonstrated promising activity. Toxicity was significant, with seven study-related deaths leading to closure after stage 1. All postoperative deaths were due to ARDS. This regimen is not recommended.